This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 21 07.62 +23 38 20.1 9.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461288.8193,9.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260905.3193 9.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 10.08 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9
187.11214 -8.17916 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J053141+1835.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.680 V Y 0.520 V 2452810.00000 80.456253000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 31 41.33 +18 35 27.9 10.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J053141+1835.5,2461288.8193,10.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J053141+1835.5 20260905.3193 10.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 20.2 9.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461288.8193,9.58,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260905.3193 9.58CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 12.36 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7
182.40649 -7.73463 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0522251+224426
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.540 g Y 0.561 g 2458357.27100 139.697128100000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 22 25.28 +22 44 26.7 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0522251+224426,2461288.8193,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0522251+224426 20260905.3193 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 12.13 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7
183.71633 -7.33539 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSVS J0526575+215241
Type: L:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.508 R1 Y 0.311 R1 75.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 26 57.45 +21 52 39.7 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0526575+215241,2461288.8193,12.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0526575+215241 20260905.3193 12.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 11.44 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5
182.41267 -7.07393 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 1958
Type:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
15.100 pg 15.600 pg
ATTENTION: measured mag 11.44 is 3.7 mag brighter than the VSX record maximum brightness 15.10 - possible unusual activity of a known variable! (Alternatively, this may be a new object that coincides with the known variable's position just by chance.)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 24 49.47 +23 06 06.5 11.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 1958,2461288.8193,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 1958 20260905.3193 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 10.98 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8
184.00044 -11.33038 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0513254+192528
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.908 R1 Y 2.800 R1 220.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 13 25.43 +19 25 28.8 11.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0513254+192528,2461288.8193,10.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0513254+192528 20260905.3193 10.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 11.20 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6
186.22085 -2.59815 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J055000+2216.1
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.900 V Y 0.640 V 2453160.10000 217.080275000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 50 00.37 +22 16 09.6 11.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J055000+2216.1,2461288.8193,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J055000+2216.1 20260905.3193 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 10.80 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7
184.60845 -8.25772 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSV 1973
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.610 V Y 0.560 V 2452752.00000 79.465989000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 25 43.15 +20 37 59.7 10.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 1973,2461288.8193,10.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 1973 20260905.3193 10.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.3193 2461288.8193 9.38 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7
183.42890 -0.32847 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" BB Tau
Type: LB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 V Y 0.640 V 2453450.10000 342.280060000000 S4e(M0)
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.34 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.3193* 05 52 18.57 +25 49 40.7 9.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
BB Tau,2461288.8193,9.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
BB Tau 20260905.3193 9.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461288.81960248 05.09.2026 07:40:03.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20173
Objects passed selection criteria: 20036
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12366.8
Average stars matched: 12187 (98.5465 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 02:47:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461288.81960248 05.09.2026 07:40:03.654 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 149889
Objects passed selection criteria: 149364
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 93023.2
Average stars matched: 89712.8 (96.4412 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 02:48:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.81903693
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:09.584 +21:59:03.00 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:09.584 +21:59:03.00
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0415 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:12.591 +21:58:27.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:12.591 +21:58:27.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0369 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:09.584 +21:59:03.00
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:12.591 +21:58:27.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01532 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6N3Sca1OAG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9JCDsiiYkm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LTXWhZuwH2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F5SYHYKt2r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.6N3Sca1OAG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.9JCDsiiYkm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LTXWhZuwH2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=202, bad_region=1, passed=2919
Got 2919 stars (including 2713 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2919 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2604 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2572 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2575 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2572 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2604 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2568 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2568 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2919 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 2568 stars left (next iteration limit 2829)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2568 robust_rms=8.231 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2568 robust_rms=0.707 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2568 robust_rms=0.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2568 robust_rms_before=1.728 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.621 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.826 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.670
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:09.705 +21:59:01.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2919 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2015700.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.728 -> 0.580 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=2568 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.730 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.663 n_q1=632 n_q2=609 n_q3=534 n_q4=793 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.F5SYHYKt2r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=204, bad_region=0, passed=2930
Got 2930 stars (including 2723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2930 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2617 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2586 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2616 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2577 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2576 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2930 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 2576 stars left (next iteration limit 2841)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2576 robust_rms=8.260 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2576 robust_rms=0.729 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.278 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2576 robust_rms=0.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.675 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2576 robust_rms_before=1.655 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.615 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.533 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.828 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.675
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:12.704 +21:58:25.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2930 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2015779.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.655 -> 0.533 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=2576 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.692 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.574 n_q1=627 n_q2=611 n_q3=539 n_q4=799 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.269
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits sigma_overall=0.599 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits sigma_overall=0.546 worst_q_ratio=1.269
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208_astrometric_residuals.png (2568 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.48 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209_astrometric_residuals.png (2576 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9: 11.03 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9: 11.09 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.05 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9: ref_mag=11.05 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.0780 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18264.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 30683_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 18264_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 06579_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.38 +23:51:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 13s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:31:41.33 +18:35:27.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Image size: 945.4'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:09.705 +21:59:01.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:09.705 +21:59:01.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0412 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:12.704 +21:58:25.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:12.704 +21:58:25.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0369 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:09.705 +21:59:01.28
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:12.704 +21:58:25.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01529 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b7vIqKf5GG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CUBOUQgNJE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PRLhhfzrTP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1hhNRAJw3T
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 68 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 12.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.b7vIqKf5GG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.CUBOUQgNJE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PRLhhfzrTP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=19, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=696, bad_region=2, passed=21528
Got 21528 stars (including 20807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21528 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013131 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010504 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 590 (Dec 16.2 to 27.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 590 (Dec 16.2 to 27.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4780 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21527 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=8.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.751 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.272 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4713 robust_rms=0.627 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.722 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4713 robust_rms_before=0.630 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.615 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.627 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.723 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.722
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.723 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.606 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.737 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.661 n_q1=1125 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1065 n_q4=1413 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1hhNRAJw3T (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=18, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=644, bad_region=1, passed=21761
Got 21761 stars (including 21091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4715 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4715 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5186)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=8.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.784 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.268 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4714 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.704 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4714 robust_rms_before=0.591 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.617 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.709 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.704
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.709 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.620 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.727 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.665 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1098 n_q3=1069 n_q4=1414 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-39-14_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0208.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_024209_TTUQ1b1x1_1763953_Ccl0SUXW/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.3: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.3: 12.75 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:45.96 +26:25:46.3: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6903 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:11:57.34 +24:42:00.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1626 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:26:57.45 +21:52:39.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1343 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:22:25.28 +22:44:26.7: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3549 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5: 12.60 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:24:49.47 +23:06:06.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4376 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.27 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:13:25.43 +19:25:28.8: ref_mag=12.27 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9686 delta=1.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:25:43.15 +20:37:59.7: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8010 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:50:00.37 +22:16:09.6: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.1992 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7: 10.32 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.34 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:52:18.57 +25:49:40.7: ref_mag=10.34 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.3708 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106921.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out18807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out68249.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out74393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83361.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190569_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190583_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.60 +16:41:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 190587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190629_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.92 +26:19:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190798_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.58 +22:27:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190828_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190828_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:17.06 +17:02:02.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190831_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190842_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.51 +23:20:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.83 +23:48:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190865_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.76 +26:45:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190899_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190899_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.13 +22:38:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 190905_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.74 +23:02:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 34493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:32.64 +25:00:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.44 +20:22:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 33497_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.19 +24:51:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 86301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:17.52 +21:43:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 52744_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:00.87 +23:44:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.28 +24:10:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.11 +17:07:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 110271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:37.35 +20:19:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 101559_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:04.29 +20:45:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 68249_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83361_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 83361_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.78 +19:21:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.88 +20:02:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.13 +17:59:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 143505_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:40.94 +19:24:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 157320_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:47.17 +17:10:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 166265_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.13 +17:45:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 71919_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:15.30 +22:31:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.38 +20:22:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 62999_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.43 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.10 +17:45:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.91 +18:24:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 07645_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:15.33 +26:43:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43431_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 43431_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:58.93 +24:14:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 143597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.14 +17:53:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 74393_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 106921_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.79 +16:57:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.21 +21:51:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.87 +25:25:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.41 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.87 +21:13:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 130073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:41.33 +18:35:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.46 +20:28:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
Preparing report for the candidate 18807_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.95 +20:10:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.57 +21:08:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.26 +22:50:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.28 +20:41:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.75 +18:35:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.62 +18:32:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.26 +20:52:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.15 +17:57:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.29 +19:52:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.70 +17:14:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.05 +17:23:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.27 +17:03:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.70 +17:02:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.40 +20:16:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.55 +25:57:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.09 +23:15:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.13 +20:08:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.19 +17:43:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_02-40-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0209 did not pass the final checks
