This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 11.70 20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8
39.80476 -31.75863 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,11.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 11.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 11.27 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7
34.05415 -26.25761 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 5.9 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J202759-1043.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.250 V Y 0.750 V 2452299.20000 96.153847000000 M3/4
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.2631* 20 27 58.70 -10 43 30.7 11.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J202759-1043.5,2461288.7631,11.27,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J202759-1043.5 20260905.2631 11.27CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 13.04 20:34:48.73 -10:07:29.2
35.46673 -27.52118 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -0 -0 0 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:48.73 -10:07:29.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:48.73 -10:07:29.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.2631* 20 34 48.73 -10 07 29.2 13.0 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,13.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 13.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 13.03 20:54:53.56 -12:45:48.9
35.08772 -33.09438 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 0 0 13.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:53.56 -12:45:48.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:53.56 -12:45:48.9: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 13.19 20:04:41.01 -08:26:29.2
33.60672 -20.09185 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos -1 1 1 13.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:04:41.01 -08:26:29.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:04:41.01 -08:26:29.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 13.80 20:42:22.33 -06:11:35.5
40.37412 -27.44780 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia 0 -1 1 13.7 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.33 -06:11:35.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.33 -06:11:35.5: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,13.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 13.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 05.2631 2461288.7631 13.88 20:07:40.29 -12:50:59.4
29.65474 -22.62763 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -1 -1 2 13.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:07:40.29 -12:50:59.4: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:07:40.29 -12:50:59.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 05.2631* 20 07 40.29 -12 50 59.4 13.9 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461288.7631,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260905.2631 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461288.76338821 05.09.2026 06:19:06.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 13
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13666
Objects passed selection criteria: 13648
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12728.5
Average stars matched: 12494.2 (98.1596 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 03:03:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461288.76338821 05.09.2026 06:19:06.741 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 94
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91593
Objects passed selection criteria: 91430
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 87312.2
Average stars matched: 84714 (97.0242 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 590664 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Sep 5 03:05:30 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461288.76280091
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00993 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hgpFv0mHxd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ofqHo6N14O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Z35AWeSGkW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w2JWUcMpgT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.5 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.hgpFv0mHxd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ofqHo6N14O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Z35AWeSGkW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=605, bad_region=0, passed=11151
Got 11151 stars (including 10535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11151 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11151 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=10.253 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.121 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.354 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.367 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.317 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.791 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.317
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1195 n_q2=1360 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1212 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.w2JWUcMpgT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=567, bad_region=0, passed=11114
Got 11114 stars (including 10529 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11114 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11114 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=10.272 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.056 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.315 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.801 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.325 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.315
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.325 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1194 n_q2=1361 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1204 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits sigma_overall=0.297 worst_q_ratio=1.167
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits sigma_overall=0.303 worst_q_ratio=1.083
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.4: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:33.99 -09:17:58.9: 11.98 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.4: 10.17 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8: 15.47 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:33.99 -09:17:58.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.17 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.00 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.90 -07:47:31.4: ref_mag=10.17 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.3741 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:33.99 -09:17:58.9: ref_mag=12.00 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1078 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2673 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20903.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20869_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20881_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.07 -06:09:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.53 -13:15:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20902_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20902_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.66 -07:32:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 20903_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.83 -12:46:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20913_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20913_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.60 -14:47:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.25 -13:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.67 -06:36:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.37 -05:08:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 08626_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.7
20:56:56.99 -08:35:41.8
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0427 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0345 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:24.601 -10:00:07.11
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:23.656 -09:59:34.18
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00993 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D3VxYsKjSS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ecrCHL5x5g
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RrBsHgbbrL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I4OdF4m06X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 86 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.D3VxYsKjSS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ecrCHL5x5g (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RrBsHgbbrL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=4232, bad_region=11, passed=80475
Got 80475 stars (including 76100 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80475 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4878 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80475 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5365)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=11.068 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.254 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.313 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.799 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.290 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.320 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.313
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.320 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.310 n_q1=1225 n_q2=1318 n_q3=1130 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.I4OdF4m06X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4217, bad_region=12, passed=79695
Got 79695 stars (including 75346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 79695 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 79695 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=11.141 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.314 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.811 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.286 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.335 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.314
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.260 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.330 n_q1=1221 n_q2=1321 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1207 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.087
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-18-15_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0132.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-05_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_012807_TTUQ1b1x1_2060620_DEsnWLbn/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:03.14 -06:06:38.3: 14.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:25:24.26 -11:39:16.3: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:26.79 -12:13:15.7: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:06:34.13 -05:32:24.5: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:06.75 -06:53:41.7: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:06.86 -10:51:05.4: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:08:10.04 -06:37:10.3: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:48.52 -05:10:11.1: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:29.66 -06:49:55.0: 14.55 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:38:23.31 -05:33:32.6: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:06.75 -06:53:41.7: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:08:10.04 -06:37:10.3: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:06:34.13 -05:32:24.5: 14.33 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:06.86 -10:51:05.4: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:25:24.26 -11:39:16.3: 14.31 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:48.52 -05:10:11.1: 14.30 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:03.14 -06:06:38.3: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:26.79 -12:13:15.7: 14.17 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:38:23.31 -05:33:32.6: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:29.66 -06:49:55.0: 14.37 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:06.75 -06:53:41.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6321 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.28 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:08:10.04 -06:37:10.3: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3033 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:06:34.13 -05:32:24.5: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.1760 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:06.86 -10:51:05.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2482 delta=-0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:48.52 -05:10:11.1: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5053 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:25:24.26 -11:39:16.3: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3425 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:03.14 -06:06:38.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3889 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:26.79 -12:13:15.7: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2568 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:23.31 -05:33:32.6: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5476 delta=-0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.66 -06:49:55.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4330 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:18:39.12 -10:57:43.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:15.1: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:09:13.28 -06:44:30.2: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:49:31.27 -09:10:14.6: 14.43 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:56.33 -06:29:32.4: 14.18 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:39:36.26 -08:29:44.5: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:14.72 -07:49:50.1: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:21:55.82 -08:24:12.9: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:44.27 -07:58:56.5: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:52.15 -11:52:14.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:09:13.28 -06:44:30.2: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:18:39.12 -10:57:43.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.18 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:13.28 -06:44:30.2: ref_mag=14.18 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2168 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:18:39.12 -10:57:43.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9254 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:15.1: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:49:31.27 -09:10:14.6: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:39:36.26 -08:29:44.5: 13.96 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:44.27 -07:58:56.5: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:21:55.82 -08:24:12.9: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:56.33 -06:29:32.4: 14.46 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:29:24.53 -08:14:15.1: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1533 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:39:36.26 -08:29:44.5: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1938 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:44.27 -07:58:56.5: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1105 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:49:31.27 -09:10:14.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2657 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:56.33 -06:29:32.4: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2668 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:21:55.82 -08:24:12.9: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9343 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:14.72 -07:49:50.1: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:14.72 -07:49:50.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0620 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:52.15 -11:52:14.9: 13.78 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:52.15 -11:52:14.9: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9288 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:30:48.94 -08:16:32.4: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:04:46.84 -10:13:03.9: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:03.30 -13:59:45.7: 13.52 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:52.65 -14:22:21.0: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:51:44.18 -08:13:09.3: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.6: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:10.01 -06:36:37.8: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:30:48.94 -08:16:32.4: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:30:48.94 -08:16:32.4: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2473 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:03.30 -13:59:45.7: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:56:15.49 -05:35:48.2: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5074 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:03.30 -13:59:45.7: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5980 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:04:46.84 -10:13:03.9: 13.39 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:52.65 -14:22:21.0: 13.38 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:04:46.84 -10:13:03.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4807 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:51:44.18 -08:13:09.3: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:52.65 -14:22:21.0: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.6735 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:32.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:51:44.18 -08:13:09.3: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9944 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.6: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:10.01 -06:36:37.8: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.88 -07:47:31.6: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5172 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:10.01 -06:36:37.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5135 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:48.73 -10:07:29.2: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:32.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:45:55.57 -08:26:32.9: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9878 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:48.73 -10:07:29.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:53.56 -12:45:48.9: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:59.50 -04:36:10.4: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:28.60 -15:24:46.5: 12.79 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:04:41.01 -08:26:29.2: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:13:38.77 -06:56:08.6: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:55:40.14 -06:42:38.2: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:53.56 -12:45:48.9: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:59.50 -04:36:10.4: 12.97 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.50 -04:36:10.4: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9533 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:28.60 -15:24:46.5: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:28.60 -15:24:46.5: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9228 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.6: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:13:38.77 -06:56:08.6: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:04:41.01 -08:26:29.2: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:13:38.77 -06:56:08.6: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2402 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.33 -06:11:35.5: 15.78 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:55:40.14 -06:42:38.2: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:55:40.14 -06:42:38.2: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3407 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:19:48.83 -14:15:58.9: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.6: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.65 -06:46:20.6: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6208 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.33 -06:11:35.5: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:05:59.77 -05:34:55.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:42:22.61 -08:15:07.3: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:19:48.83 -14:15:58.9: 13.60 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:19:48.83 -14:15:58.9: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5894 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:33.68 -06:24:34.2: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:05:59.77 -05:34:55.7: 13.68 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:05:59.77 -05:34:55.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6613 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:42:22.61 -08:15:07.3: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:22:38.86 -09:00:32.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:42:22.61 -08:15:07.3: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7259 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:52:42.80 -09:50:35.4: 13.88 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:33.68 -06:24:34.2: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:33.68 -06:24:34.2: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7564 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:39.78 -11:51:48.8: 13.86 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:22:38.86 -09:00:32.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:52:42.80 -09:50:35.4: 14.00 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:22:38.86 -09:00:32.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7738 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:52:42.80 -09:50:35.4: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9204 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:39.78 -11:51:48.8: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:07:40.29 -12:50:59.4: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:39.78 -11:51:48.8: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9676 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:56.02 -08:41:11.0: 14.04 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:07:40.29 -12:50:59.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:23.56 -09:59:35.2: 14.38 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:26:39.52 -07:53:33.6: 14.06 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:56.02 -08:41:11.0: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:56.02 -08:41:11.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9437 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:33:11.04 -10:41:32.6: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:01:19.52 -06:16:22.2: 14.60 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:23.56 -09:59:35.2: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.35 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:23.56 -09:59:35.2: ref_mag=14.35 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2078 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:26:39.52 -07:53:33.6: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:26:39.52 -07:53:33.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0838 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:33:11.04 -10:41:32.6: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:33:11.04 -10:41:32.6: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1453 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:01:19.52 -06:16:22.2: 14.39 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:01:19.52 -06:16:22.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3954 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:09:45.34 -13:19:52.4: 14.68 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:47:09.22 -05:57:10.1: 14.92 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:09:45.34 -13:19:52.4: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:37.30 -11:34:58.0: 14.80 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:09:45.34 -13:19:52.4: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.0942 delta=0.61 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:38.87 -08:07:30.9: 14.55 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:47.60 -11:58:41.4: 14.93 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:47:09.22 -05:57:10.1: 14.79 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:37.30 -11:34:58.0: 14.67 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:47:09.22 -05:57:10.1: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6143 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:37.30 -11:34:58.0: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5502 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:38.87 -08:07:30.9: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:38.87 -08:07:30.9: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5159 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:47.60 -11:58:41.4: 14.94 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:47.60 -11:58:41.4: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4941 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:05.89 -12:36:25.4: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:22.40 -05:55:32.2: 15.19 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:59.05 -05:37:30.5: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:48:34.01 -08:38:53.6: 15.04 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:05.89 -12:36:25.4: 15.01 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:05.89 -12:36:25.4: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5814 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:54:44.14 -07:38:12.2: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:22.40 -05:55:32.2: 14.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:59.05 -05:37:30.5: 15.07 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:44:22.40 -05:55:32.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6026 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:59.05 -05:37:30.5: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6422 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:48:34.01 -08:38:53.6: 14.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:48:34.01 -08:38:53.6: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5221 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:54:44.14 -07:38:12.2: 14.64 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:54:44.14 -07:38:12.2: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6905 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:02:49.57 -06:36:04.6: 14.97 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:58:16.37 -06:21:31.3: 14.84 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:12.78 -10:32:43.5: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:46:58.37 -05:52:35.2: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:02:49.57 -06:36:04.6: 15.13 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:02:49.57 -06:36:04.6: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.5575 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:26.38 -12:36:13.0: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:58:16.37 -06:21:31.3: 14.86 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.85 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:58:16.37 -06:21:31.3: ref_mag=14.85 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6191 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:12.78 -10:32:43.5: 14.66 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 21:03:12.78 -10:32:43.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5671 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:46:58.37 -05:52:35.2: 15.10 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.02 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:46:58.37 -05:52:35.2: ref_mag=15.02 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6276 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:26.38 -12:36:13.0: 14.74 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:26.38 -12:36:13.0: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5531 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113864.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113865.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113891.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113973.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114029.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113660_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113661_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113661_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113670_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113673_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113673_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113680_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113680_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113689_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113689_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113693_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113694_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113698_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113707_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113712_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113712_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113716_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113721_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113721_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:09.27 -06:24:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113736_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113743_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113743_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113748_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113751_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113751_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113761_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113763_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113795_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113795_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:56:56.98 -08:35:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.64 -08:56:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113856_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113864_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 113864_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 113865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113866_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 113891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113896_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.99 -07:43:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113900_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113900_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113901_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113953_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113953_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.47 -05:43:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113960_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113960_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113972_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113972_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.70 -06:23:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113973_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 113973_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113974_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113974_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113975_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113975_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113976_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113976_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113987_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 113987_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:59.58 -07:09:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114006_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114006_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114016_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114016_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114023_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114023_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114024_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114024_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:24.68 -07:54:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114029_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
Preparing report for the candidate 114029_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114041_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114041_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114061_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114061_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114088_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114088_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114094_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114094_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114130_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114130_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114132_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114132_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114186_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114198_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114198_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114205_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114205_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114207_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114207_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114220_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114220_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114221_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114226_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114226_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114228_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114228_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114257_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114257_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114258_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114258_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114261_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114261_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114271_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114271_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114276_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114276_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114293_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 114293_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.65 -07:32:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.19 -05:17:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.53 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.08 -06:09:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.84 -12:46:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.26 -13:18:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 60527_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:27:58.70 -10:43:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.59 -14:47:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.34 -07:21:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 69949_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:26:13.38 -13:47:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.65 -06:36:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133
The candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-05_01-19-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0133 did not pass the final checks
