This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 10.57 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9
222.42072 1.10053 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" AM Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 pg 16.500 pg 2427370.00000 432.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AM Mon,2461286.9757,10.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AM Mon 20260903.4757 10.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 8.77 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1
232.80078 9.24896 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" DX Pup
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
9.900 V Y 1.170 V 2453388.70000 472.000000000000 M6-M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.73 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DX Pup,2461286.9757,8.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DX Pup 20260903.4757 8.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 9.82 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3
225.68968 12.40769 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J075905-0523.5
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.730 V Y 0.930 V 2452059.10000 128.600000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J075905-0523.5,2461286.9757,9.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J075905-0523.5 20260903.4757 9.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.38 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5
227.10966 11.52266 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0832 Mon
Type: SR:
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.200 V 14.200 V 2452220.00000 186.800000000000 M7/8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0832 Mon,2461286.9757,11.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0832 Mon 20260903.4757 11.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.78 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1
227.23075 11.58877 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J075912-0706.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.410 V Y 0.790 V 2452005.20000 62.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J075912-0706.4,2461286.9757,11.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J075912-0706.4 20260903.4757 11.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 10.61 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7
234.01212 9.76477 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0588 Pup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.800 V < 16.300 V 2452772.00000 233.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0588 Pup,2461286.9757,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0588 Pup 20260903.4757 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 10.96 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6
228.97175 10.22927 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS J0757514-091559
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.593 R1 Y 0.510 R1 307.000000000000 Ce
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0757514-091559,2461286.9757,10.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0757514-091559 20260903.4757 10.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.46 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8
225.15457 3.64361 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASAS J072705-0909.1
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.280 V < 15.000 V 2454597.00000 458.000000000000 C
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J072705-0909.1,2461286.9757,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J072705-0909.1 20260903.4757 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.37 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7
231.37181 9.87519 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J080127-1129.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.260 V Y 0.800 V 2452344.20000 208.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J080127-1129.2,2461286.9757,11.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J080127-1129.2 20260903.4757 11.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.76 07:48:59.23 -11:02:27.8
229.43383 7.45343 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" V0575 Mon
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
> 10.400 V < 14.500 V 2454156.00000 224.000000000000 M8-M9
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:48:59.23 -11:02:27.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:48:59.23 -11:02:27.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0575 Mon,2461286.9757,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0575 Mon 20260903.4757 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 8.30 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2
232.47723 9.05775 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" U Pup
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
8.300 V 15.000 V 2453064.00000 318.440000000000 M5e-M8e
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Pup,2461286.9757,8.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Pup 20260903.4757 8.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 10.37 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0
229.09064 2.32877 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" TZ Pup
Type: SRB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.100 V 14.100 V 2454740.00000 313.000000000000 M7-M8
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
TZ Pup,2461286.9757,10.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
TZ Pup 20260903.4757 10.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4757 2461286.9757 11.63 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3
232.70184 9.76785 galactic Pup Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 6.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" NSV 3884
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.800 V < 14.500 V 2453660.00000 173.000000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSV 3884,2461286.9757,11.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSV 3884 20260903.4757 11.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461136.62156810 06.04.2026 02:54:53.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461136.62156810 06.04.2026 02:54:53.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461286.97605878 03.09.2026 11:25:21.479 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27600
Objects passed selection criteria: 27418
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16608.5
Average stars matched: 16123.5 (97.0798 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 251656 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 07:20:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461136.62156810 06.04.2026 02:54:53.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461136.62156810 06.04.2026 02:54:53.484 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461286.97605878 03.09.2026 11:25:21.479 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 151
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 33 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 191121
Objects passed selection criteria: 190394
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 127457
Average stars matched: 122329 (95.9767 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 650888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 07:22:06 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461286.97541216
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51
Second-epoch image center 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0507 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 944.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:53.791 -10:00:57.06 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.791 -10:00:57.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.791 -10:00:57.06
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01072 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLSVnq3WBc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.41J4rZyMTV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HoJJwNJQAh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L0UqUtpsaE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7601 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.5627 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7601 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.5627 deg
Loaded 24669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17283 out of 18783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18783 out of 29488 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.753000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.753000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.95
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.80
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29488 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7601 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.5627 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7601 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2833 to -4.5627 deg
Loaded 24669 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17283 out of 18783 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18783 out of 29488 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 29392 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7667 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2830 to -4.5632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7667 to 123.9227 deg, Dec -15.2830 to -4.5632 deg
Loaded 24655 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 17238 out of 18736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18736 out of 29392 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.6 pix Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.3 pix fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
2.3 pix fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.zLSVnq3WBc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2771, bad_region=0, passed=29488
Got 29488 stars (including 26692 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29488 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.663 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.504 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.775 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.523 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.840 n_q1=933 n_q2=1493 n_q3=1024 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.267
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.41J4rZyMTV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2806, bad_region=1, passed=29392
Got 29392 stars (including 26557 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29392 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29392 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.677 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.810 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.868 n_q1=929 n_q2=1509 n_q3=1022 n_q4=1426 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HoJJwNJQAh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=333, bad_region=0, passed=4060
Got 4060 stars (including 3723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4060 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3659 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3613 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3613 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3659 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3615 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3615 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4057 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3615 stars left (next iteration limit 3974)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3615 robust_rms=6.899 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.273 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3615 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.823 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3615 robust_rms=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.558 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3615 robust_rms_before=1.379 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.428 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.381 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.596 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.558
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.596 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=3615 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1134 n_q2=533 n_q3=1316 n_q4=632 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.313
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.L0UqUtpsaE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=339, bad_region=0, passed=3916
Got 3916 stars (including 3573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013119 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010496 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3512 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3465 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3465 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3465 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3513 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3466 stars left (next iteration limit 3811)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3466 robust_rms=6.936 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3466 robust_rms=0.550 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.938 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3466 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3466 robust_rms_before=1.297 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.434 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.635 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.534
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:53.858 -10:00:58.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 3916 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1667059.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.297 -> 0.389 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=3466 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.585 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1069 n_q2=523 n_q3=1259 n_q4=615 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.424
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.663 worst_q_ratio=1.267
ref2=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.677 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits sigma_overall=0.441 worst_q_ratio=1.313
new2=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.424
reference average sigma_overall=0.67 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.59 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.61 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499_astrometric_residuals.png (3615 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500_astrometric_residuals.png (3466 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:00:50.42 -12:50:28.4: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9: 12.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1: 9.70 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:50.42 -12:50:28.4: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1: 9.75 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:00:50.42 -12:50:28.4: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=8.2337 delta=3.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.73 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5736 delta=1.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1: ref_mag=9.73 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.7694 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out31777.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out08538.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22456.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31758_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 31758_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:54.94 -06:19:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31777_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 31777_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:50.42 -12:50:28.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 8.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=9.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.135 5726179321068118528 120.21033799396 -12.84141635867 9.1073 7.5342 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.135#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31778_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 31778_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:07.95 -12:31:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08538_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 08538_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22456_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 22456_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
07:12:48.92 -07:55:41.9
08:02:11.07 -13:01:05.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51
Second-epoch image center 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0507 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Image size: 944.8'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:42:53.858 -10:00:58.38 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:43:01.056 -09:59:18.51
Second-epoch image center 07:42:53.858 -10:00:58.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0405 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:42:52.609 -10:01:31.49
Second-epoch second image center 07:42:53.858 -10:00:58.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01053 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.68wZIzhSoD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uibCv63JTr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tGp840cT9s
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Og0UIwH3X8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 208114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7538 to 123.9287 deg, Dec -15.2844 to -4.5628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7538 to 123.9287 deg, Dec -15.2844 to -4.5628 deg
Loaded 24687 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14799 out of 21111 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21111 out of 208114 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.572100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.572100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.98
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 208114 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7538 to 123.9287 deg, Dec -15.2844 to -4.5628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7538 to 123.9287 deg, Dec -15.2844 to -4.5628 deg
Loaded 24687 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14799 out of 21111 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21111 out of 208114 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 209003 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 107.7626 to 123.9295 deg, Dec -15.2840 to -4.5632 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 107.7626 to 123.9295 deg, Dec -15.2840 to -4.5632 deg
Loaded 24672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14748 out of 21194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 21194 out of 209003 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 143 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.2 pix Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
2.2 pix fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.0 mag. Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
13.0 mag. fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.68wZIzhSoD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=133, blended=32592, bad_region=0, passed=207981
Got 207981 stars (including 175166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 207981 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 207981 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.774 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.517 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.827 n_q1=957 n_q2=1486 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1421 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.uibCv63JTr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=116, blended=32777, bad_region=2, passed=208887
Got 208887 stars (including 175892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 208887 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4934 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 208887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.646 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.772 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.814 n_q1=956 n_q2=1478 n_q3=1030 n_q4=1439 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.260
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.tGp840cT9s (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1745, bad_region=0, passed=48538
Got 48538 stars (including 46721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=5.830 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=37.745 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.525 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.780 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.372 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.379 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.509 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.521
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.509 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.511 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.368 n_q1=1578 n_q2=658 n_q3=1801 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.285
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Og0UIwH3X8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1603, bad_region=0, passed=46907
Got 46907 stars (including 45231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46907 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013122 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010498 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5359)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=5.697 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=38.927 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.801 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.524 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=0.391 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.386 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.524 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.524
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.524 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1570 n_q2=646 n_q3=1821 n_q4=836 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.291
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-24-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0499.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_071816_TTUQ1b1x1_1638809_B3ZZViPN/wcs_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:28:03.72 -11:07:26.0: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:17:19.74 -10:34:56.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:33:58.78 -08:37:29.2: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:21:06.33 -09:44:15.4: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:17:19.74 -10:34:56.1: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:28:03.72 -11:07:26.0: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:33:58.78 -08:37:29.2: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:19.74 -10:34:56.1: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5402 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:03.72 -11:07:26.0: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6424 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:33:58.78 -08:37:29.2: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0234 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:25:12.31 -04:48:21.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:21:06.33 -09:44:15.4: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:06.33 -09:44:15.4: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4097 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:13:09.06 -09:41:14.2: 12.18 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:25:12.31 -04:48:21.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:12.31 -04:48:21.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:13:09.06 -09:41:14.2: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:09.06 -09:41:14.2: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2676 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:17:51.50 -13:00:58.7: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:12:16.77 -08:57:51.5: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:18:38.54 -11:26:17.9: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:18:01.06 -08:26:44.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:17:51.50 -13:00:58.7: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:51.50 -13:00:58.7: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9197 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:12:16.77 -08:57:51.5: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.81 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:16.77 -08:57:51.5: ref_mag=11.81 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1252 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:18:38.54 -11:26:17.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:18:01.06 -08:26:44.4: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:38.54 -11:26:17.9: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9163 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:01.06 -08:26:44.4: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0992 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:37:03.76 -09:13:20.5: 10.26 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:37:03.76 -09:13:20.5: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.23 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:03.76 -09:13:20.5: ref_mag=10.23 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5103 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:02:48.19 -15:05:39.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:32:40.73 -09:24:40.6: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:26:50.15 -05:52:49.8: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:19:11.43 -13:15:33.5: 12.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:02:48.19 -15:05:39.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:02:48.19 -15:05:39.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:18:06.71 -09:30:16.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:14:34.90 -10:14:13.5: 12.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:32:40.73 -09:24:40.6: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:40.73 -09:24:40.6: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2093 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:26:50.15 -05:52:49.8: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:50.15 -05:52:49.8: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3655 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:19:11.43 -13:15:33.5: 12.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:19:11.43 -13:15:33.5: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2235 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:26:29.73 -07:22:22.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:18:06.71 -09:30:16.3: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:06.71 -09:30:16.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2858 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:14:34.90 -10:14:13.5: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:14:34.90 -10:14:13.5: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4894 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:17:03.32 -13:59:10.9: 12.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:26:29.73 -07:22:22.3: 12.47 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:26:29.73 -07:22:22.3: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4479 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:17:03.32 -13:59:10.9: 12.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:17:03.32 -13:59:10.9: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4013 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:16:04.44 -14:16:24.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:53:45.05 -06:26:30.9: 10.30 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:56:21.03 -13:54:37.5: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1: 12.71 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7: 13.34 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:16:04.44 -14:16:24.0: 12.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:04.44 -14:16:24.0: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3930 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:53:45.05 -06:26:30.9: 10.31 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3: 10.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.31 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:53:45.05 -06:26:30.9: ref_mag=10.31 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.4529 delta=0.85 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:56:21.03 -13:54:37.5: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:58:43.47 -07:02:12.5: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3773 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:59:04.52 -05:23:31.3: ref_mag=10.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=9.8222 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:56:21.03 -13:54:37.5: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.7611 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:59:11.55 -07:06:26.1: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.7665 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:06:31.99 -13:46:34.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6041 delta=2.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:57:51.42 -09:15:58.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=10.9591 delta=2.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:27:04.53 -09:09:08.8: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.4541 delta=1.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7: 12.29 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:48:59.23 -11:02:27.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2: 12.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:01:26.97 -11:29:11.7: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.3660 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:48:59.23 -11:02:27.8: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:00:50.41 -12:50:28.2: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=8.2994 delta=3.74 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0: 11.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:29:59.15 -13:14:07.0: ref_mag=11.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.3703 delta=1.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-54-53_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3: 13.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-04-05_21-55-36_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3: 13.40 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 08:03:48.45 -12:40:06.3: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=11.6288 delta=1.77 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out122994.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out13239.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134750.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191545.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out195897.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out198975.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out43284.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out81521.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86844.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 13s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236617_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236617_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236626_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236626_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:52.69 -06:53:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236634_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236634_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236635_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236635_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:24.02 -08:09:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236646_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236646_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:53.14 -09:22:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236647_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236647_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:27.23 -05:04:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236650_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236650_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:35.28 -06:25:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236654_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236654_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236658_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236658_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:21.22 -11:12:45.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236664_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236664_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:38.76 -08:40:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236665_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236665_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:19.56 -06:57:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236668_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236668_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:28.17 -07:11:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236669_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236669_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:22.15 -08:47:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236670_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236670_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:40.98 -11:38:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236675_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236675_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236676_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236676_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:53:47.33 -08:49:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236677_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236677_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:32.09 -12:19:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236683_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236683_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:05:45.07 -05:32:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236684_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236684_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:13.20 -08:26:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236685_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236685_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:12.49 -06:45:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236686_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236686_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:58.52 -12:53:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236688_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236688_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:03.57 -10:49:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236689_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236689_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236690_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236690_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:51.01 -08:13:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236692_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236692_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236693_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236693_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:41.32 -14:47:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236694_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236694_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:55.80 -11:36:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236695_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236695_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:27.34 -11:03:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236697_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236697_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:42.25 -08:25:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236698_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236698_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:26.39 -14:09:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236699_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236699_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:56.82 -12:58:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236701_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236701_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:09.44 -09:43:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236702_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236702_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:18.95 -12:28:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236703_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236703_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:36.68 -12:51:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236704_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236704_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:05.27 -05:34:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236705_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236705_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236706_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236706_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.99 -07:57:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236707_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236707_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:02.22 -12:40:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236708_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236708_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:08.06 -09:39:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236709_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236709_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:16.69 -12:25:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236710_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236710_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:33.34 -10:25:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236711_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236711_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:05.03 -06:40:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236712_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236712_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:42.36 -11:09:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236713_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236713_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:19.41 -13:30:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236714_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236714_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:24.75 -08:07:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236716_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236716_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:10.97 -11:12:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236718_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236718_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236720_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236720_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:00:40.49 -11:10:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236721_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236721_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:42.37 -09:25:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236722_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236722_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236724_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236724_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236725_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236725_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:08.04 -08:57:05.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236726_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236726_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 -04:55:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236727_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236727_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:50.11 -11:32:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236728_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236728_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:13.81 -07:39:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236730_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236730_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:11.11 -09:54:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236731_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236731_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:51.31 -14:22:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236732_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236732_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:39.26 -06:31:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236733_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236733_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:35.82 -13:22:53.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236735_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236735_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:32.32 -07:43:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236736_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236736_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:07.61 -14:43:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236737_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236737_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236740_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236740_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:02.78 -09:16:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236741_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236741_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:47.79 -11:29:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236742_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236742_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:15.25 -05:35:45.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236743_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236743_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:04.21 -07:37:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236744_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236744_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:40.93 -05:46:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236745_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236745_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:43.80 -06:54:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236746_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236746_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:38.82 -09:17:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236747_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236747_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:32.62 -09:29:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236748_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236748_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:53.69 -13:19:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236749_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236749_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:17.51 -10:43:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236751_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236751_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236753_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236753_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:54.93 -06:19:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236770_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236770_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:07.94 -12:31:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236779_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236779_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:06.17 -04:47:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236862_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236862_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:15.88 -07:52:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236903_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236903_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:59.49 -06:14:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 236949_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 236949_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:31.66 -12:35:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237112_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237112_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:22.06 -10:13:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237170_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237170_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:16.93 -06:01:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237273_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237273_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:07.75 -09:05:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237284_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237284_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:11.91 -05:34:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237297_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237297_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:36.97 -10:17:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237315_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237315_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:30.59 -12:13:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237358_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237358_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:32.08 -14:28:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237363_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237363_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:53.59 -09:27:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237485_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237485_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:51:01.85 -11:06:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237570_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237570_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:15.74 -14:22:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237601_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237601_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:23.59 -10:13:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237608_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237608_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:14.56 -08:01:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237611_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237611_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:33.98 -10:14:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237619_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237619_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237643_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237643_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:55.97 -05:45:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237648_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237648_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:55.59 -05:14:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237653_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237653_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:54.34 -05:25:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237723_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237723_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:44.70 -13:22:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237734_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237734_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:13:49.05 -05:46:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237743_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237743_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237753_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237753_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:30.74 -11:12:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237756_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237756_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:28.90 -09:28:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237764_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237764_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237778_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237778_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:07.30 -12:50:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237786_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237786_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:33.36 -07:20:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237788_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237788_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237800_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237800_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:18.09 -14:05:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237802_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237802_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237827_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237827_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:41.22 -08:12:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237831_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237831_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:57.18 -06:44:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237835_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237835_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237848_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237848_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:19.70 -04:56:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237880_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237880_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:00.87 -13:45:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237886_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237886_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:54.45 -09:08:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237930_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237930_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237943_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237943_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:15.78 -04:48:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 237957_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 237957_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:16.58 -13:55:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238005_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238005_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:38.48 -09:53:57.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238045_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238045_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238063_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238063_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:20.62 -11:11:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238087_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238087_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:21.14 -08:51:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238089_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238089_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:17.56 -13:50:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238090_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238090_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (8.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238143_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238143_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:39.59 -07:58:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238250_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238250_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:07.09 -13:13:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 238264_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 238264_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:08.47 -12:49:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170579_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 170579_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31464_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 31464_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13239_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 13239_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175119_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 175119_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43218_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 43218_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43284_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 43284_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176053_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 176053_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196663_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 196663_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:15.91 -13:05:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86844_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 86844_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81521_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 81521_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173997_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 173997_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (39.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134750_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 134750_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122994_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 122994_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195897_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 195897_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56402_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 56402_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:48.98 -07:55:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191545_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
Preparing report for the candidate 191545_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205059_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500
The candidate 205059_fd_Mon-06-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_06-25-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0500 did not pass the final checks
