This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,6.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 6.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,13.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 13.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,7.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 7.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4191 2461286.9191 11.11 07:02:46.55 +22:17:36.3
194.01216 12.33917 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:46.55 +22:17:36.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:46.55 +22:17:36.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,11.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 11.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4191 2461286.9191 11.98 07:04:11.29 +23:53:31.9
192.65466 13.29284 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 8.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 0 0 12.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:11.29 +23:53:31.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:11.29 +23:53:31.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4191 2461286.9191 13.13 07:17:48.38 +24:48:12.2
193.06520 16.50110 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 8.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 -0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.38 +24:48:12.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:48.38 +24:48:12.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4191 2461286.9191 13.32 07:14:40.15 +18:16:50.0
198.94220 13.21131 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.114 Kassandra 0 0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:40.15 +18:16:50.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:40.15 +18:16:50.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4191 2461286.9191 13.57 07:34:43.36 +23:15:45.2
196.10826 19.48714 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 1 -0 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:43.36 +23:15:45.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:43.36 +23:15:45.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9191,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4191 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461286.91944626 03.09.2026 10:03:50.157 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22049
Objects passed selection criteria: 21917
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14808.2
Average stars matched: 14428.2 (97.4339 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 246724 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 05:38:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461286.91944626 03.09.2026 10:03:50.157 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 139
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 35 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139875
Objects passed selection criteria: 139427
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 101189
Average stars matched: 97328.8 (96.1849 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605160 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 05:40:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461286.91877183
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0224 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 942.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.508 +22:01:53.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.508 +22:01:53.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0341 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:00.508 +22:01:53.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01324 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tmhLpk3b4L
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.trz05enq7o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MEbI5WvU51
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2MjjilvtZP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.tmhLpk3b4L (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.trz05enq7o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.MEbI5WvU51 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=0, passed=6257
Got 6257 stars (including 5826 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6257 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=7.586 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.461 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4805 robust_rms_before=0.910 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.354 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.408 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.372
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.408 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1579 n_q2=895 n_q3=1493 n_q4=838 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.2MjjilvtZP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=423, bad_region=0, passed=6311
Got 6311 stars (including 5884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6311 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013096 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010477 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6311 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=7.477 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.959 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.438 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=0.927 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.366
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 943.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.518 +22:01:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6311 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4165997.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.927 -> 0.330 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1579 n_q2=900 n_q3=1491 n_q4=834 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits sigma_overall=0.348 worst_q_ratio=1.112
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.0: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5459 delta=-0.52 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 31356_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 31373_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 31380_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31421_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 31421_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 31440_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.00 +20:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0224 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Image size: 943.1'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:00.518 +22:01:52.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:00.518 +22:01:52.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0338 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:02.902 +22:01:18.90
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:00.518 +22:01:52.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01302 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gI7rnJzeTX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ICpNEP6wjC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mSXtB30kIg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RmGVn1MLiE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 134 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gI7rnJzeTX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ICpNEP6wjC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mSXtB30kIg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1961, bad_region=4, passed=50988
Got 50988 stars (including 48942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50988 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4805 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 50988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=7.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=0.908 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.344 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.401 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.366
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.401 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1567 n_q2=883 n_q3=1514 n_q4=840 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RmGVn1MLiE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1967, bad_region=3, passed=51324
Got 51324 stars (including 49260 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013099 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010479 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4802 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4802 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=7.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=24.807 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.473 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4802 robust_rms=0.328 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4802 robust_rms_before=0.330 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.328 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.368
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.367 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits N_match=4802 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1558 n_q2=890 n_q3=1505 n_q4=849 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-02-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0423.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_053622_TTUQ1b1x1_4089374_hIFsSopX/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:50.24 +23:58:01.7: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.60 +23:40:17.4: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:50.24 +23:58:01.7: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.60 +23:40:17.4: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:50.24 +23:58:01.7: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1479 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.60 +23:40:17.4: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5057 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:29.90 +27:10:50.4: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:52:07.83 +19:42:02.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:02.65 +19:22:27.3: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:29.90 +27:10:50.4: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:29.90 +27:10:50.4: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7333 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:02:46.55 +22:17:36.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:52:07.83 +19:42:02.9: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:02.65 +19:22:27.3: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:07.83 +19:42:02.9: ref_mag=12.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2508 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:02:02.65 +19:22:27.3: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3358 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:02:46.55 +22:17:36.3: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:04:11.29 +23:53:31.9: 15.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.3: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:30.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:04:11.29 +23:53:31.9: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.3: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:30.6: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:30.6: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3888 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.3: 10.73 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.72 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.85 +22:50:51.3: ref_mag=10.72 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4196 delta=-1.70 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.4: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:27.17 +26:25:33.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4403 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.7: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.7: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4528 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:13.53 +20:25:08.4: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:13.53 +20:25:08.4: 12.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:13.53 +20:25:08.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3648 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:42.98 +18:04:09.6: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:54:22.96 +21:10:53.6: 12.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:42.98 +18:04:09.6: 12.25 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:42.98 +18:04:09.6: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3318 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:42.97 +17:59:13.2: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:54:22.96 +21:10:53.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:22.96 +21:10:53.6: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8817 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:55.97 +25:00:43.0: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:44.8: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:42.97 +17:59:13.2: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:42.97 +17:59:13.2: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6870 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:55.97 +25:00:43.0: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:55.97 +25:00:43.0: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9901 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:44.8: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:13:51.10 +17:46:44.8: ref_mag=12.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8599 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:52.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:21.71 +18:38:32.1: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:52.5: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:27:01.20 +23:55:52.5: ref_mag=12.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9072 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:42:45.15 +24:08:03.6: 12.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:03:30.72 +25:20:59.1: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:21.71 +18:38:32.1: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:50.20 +26:30:59.3: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:12:21.71 +18:38:32.1: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8035 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:42:45.15 +24:08:03.6: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:42:45.15 +24:08:03.6: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8665 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:03:30.72 +25:20:59.1: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:03:30.72 +25:20:59.1: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0961 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:50.20 +26:30:59.3: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:34:50.20 +26:30:59.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0720 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.62 +22:49:42.9: 12.83 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.62 +22:49:42.9: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:17:48.38 +24:48:12.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.62 +22:49:42.9: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.2879 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:40.15 +18:16:50.0: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.9: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.20 +21:43:09.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:17:48.38 +24:48:12.2: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:12.7: 13.65 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:40.15 +18:16:50.0: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.9: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.94 +20:13:25.9: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2899 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.20 +21:43:09.3: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.20 +21:43:09.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2193 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:12.7: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.29 +22:51:12.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=13.4699 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:34:43.36 +23:15:45.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:34:43.36 +23:15:45.2: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175761.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176498.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176509.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176660.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175437_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:22.44 +24:00:01.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:11.09 +23:57:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 175449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175456_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:08.60 +17:49:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175457_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175462_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.01 +20:09:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:53.96 +20:45:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.74 +24:28:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175472_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:05.36 +26:01:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175475_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:05.05 +19:40:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.94 +18:59:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:13.13 +18:03:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175478_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.52 +21:02:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.85 +20:04:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.79 +21:35:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:00.08 +19:41:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.52 +17:59:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:44.18 +19:19:32.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:32.85 +22:42:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.20 +19:25:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175487_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:20.35 +27:06:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:01.15 +25:15:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175490_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.28 +22:46:53.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.59 +22:11:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175492_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175493_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.72 +22:16:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.10 +23:55:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.77 +19:32:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:49.26 +26:56:48.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:59.67 +26:50:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 175610_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175662_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175673_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175728_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175737_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.64 +19:12:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175758_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.55 +22:52:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 175761_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175777_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.23 +24:07:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175802_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.14 +22:38:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175804_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.40 +19:28:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175858_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175858_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.73 +25:46:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175874_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.37 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175885_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175939_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.12 +26:07:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175951_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175955_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:10.67 +22:27:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175957_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.96 +19:13:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175963_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:46:14.86 +18:30:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175971_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175971_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.96 +23:03:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 175984_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:48.05 +17:59:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176018_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:26.91 +20:36:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176019_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176019_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.36 +26:03:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176032_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176032_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.77 +19:51:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:31.06 +20:04:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176061_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176061_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176090_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.04 +23:37:29.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.05 +25:55:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176105_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.88 +20:58:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176108_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176108_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.35 +25:56:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176110_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.76 +25:23:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176111_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.91 +23:25:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176114_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176114_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.50 +22:23:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176116_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176118_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.84 +22:57:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176120_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.94 +22:42:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176121_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176121_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:20.47 +26:22:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176138_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176138_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.22 +24:16:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176145_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176145_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.53 +20:26:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176163_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.17 +22:10:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176176_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176176_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.20 +26:51:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176180_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176185_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176185_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.88 +23:15:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176189_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:51.04 +23:51:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176197_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:57.54 +20:28:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176198_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176199_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176199_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.63 +25:29:30.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176201_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:46.74 +23:15:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176205_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176205_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.54 +18:39:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176211_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176211_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.09 +22:43:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176233_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176234_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176234_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176241_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.43 +21:18:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176251_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176251_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.98 +23:26:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176253_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176253_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.88 +25:33:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176260_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176260_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.78 +23:56:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176273_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176279_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176279_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176293_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.14 +22:52:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176311_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.07 +17:45:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176314_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.78 +18:51:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176319_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176319_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176327_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176327_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176342_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176342_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.38 +21:47:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176393_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176413_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.11 +22:57:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:27.70 +22:58:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176436_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176436_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.17 +22:57:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176449_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.67 +22:49:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176455_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.42 +20:30:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176464_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 +19:28:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.11 +24:39:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.43 +20:05:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.13 +21:45:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.35 +21:31:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 176498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.44 +24:54:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176505_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.55 +20:26:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.86 +22:49:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176516_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176530_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176548_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.25 +24:32:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176549_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176578_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.18 +22:51:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176598_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.05 +21:35:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176628_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176628_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.76 +21:27:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176634_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.82 +22:50:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176650_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:39.47 +26:48:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176651_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176651_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.66 +20:31:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176652_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176652_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.29 +22:57:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 176655_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:41.32 +22:55:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176660_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
Preparing report for the candidate 176660_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.41 +26:47:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.07 +25:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.51 +24:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 106224_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:11.62 +19:32:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_05-03-50_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0424 did not pass the final checks
