This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 12.16 00:01:30.73 +26:19:45.9
109.21795 -35.20928 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.695 Bella -0 -0 0 12.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:01:30.73 +26:19:45.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:01:30.73 +26:19:45.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9067,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4067 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 12.47 00:21:26.55 +17:21:03.3
112.79796 -44.92981 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.165 Loreley 0 -0 0 12.6 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:21:26.55 +17:21:03.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:21:26.55 +17:21:03.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9067,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4067 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 13.42 23:53:49.41 +19:07:33.8
104.58952 -41.68450 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.665 Sabine -0 -0 0 13.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:53:49.41 +19:07:33.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:53:49.41 +19:07:33.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9067,13.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4067 13.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 13.93 00:03:43.95 +18:21:12.3
107.35684 -43.07094 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1468 Zomba -1 -0 1 13.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:03:43.95 +18:21:12.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:03:43.95 +18:21:12.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9067,13.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4067 13.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 14.67 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0
98.97768 -37.87506 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461286.9067,14.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260903.4067 14.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 03.4067 2461286.9067 11.97 23:47:52.78 +23:56:06.3
104.74992 -36.68247 galactic Peg Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.71 Niobe -0 -0 0 12.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:47:52.78 +23:56:06.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:47:52.78 +23:56:06.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461286.9067,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260903.4067 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461238.93300359 17.07.2026 10:23:21.510 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461238.93300359 17.07.2026 10:23:21.510 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461286.90693854 03.09.2026 09:45:49.490 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8509
Objects passed selection criteria: 8491
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7410.75
Average stars matched: 7098.25 (95.7832 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 05:24:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461238.93300359 17.07.2026 10:23:21.510 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
First image: 2461238.93300359 17.07.2026 10:23:21.510 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Last image: 2461286.90693854 03.09.2026 09:45:49.490 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 160
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 48991
Objects passed selection criteria: 48869
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 45240.5
Average stars matched: 43356.8 (95.8361 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 269308 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Wed Sep 2 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-201-ga7d4d23b
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-09-02)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Sep 3 05:25:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461286.90642926
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17
Second-epoch image center 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0748 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17
Second-epoch image center 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TwNiBvSzWZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fh6NAJxVUl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WzEfQpwOEz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aNW0Rz4N72
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 8496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.2292 to 8.6895 deg, Dec +16.5741 to +27.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.2292 to 8.6895 deg, Dec 16.5741 to 27.2661 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5352 out of 5532 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5532 out of 8496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.552700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.552700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.43
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.12
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 8496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.2292 to 8.6895 deg, Dec +16.5741 to +27.2661 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.2292 to 8.6895 deg, Dec 16.5741 to 27.2661 deg
Loaded 6834 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5352 out of 5532 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5532 out of 8496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 9308 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.1747 to 8.6909 deg, Dec +16.5687 to +27.2687 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.1747 to 8.6909 deg, Dec 16.5687 to 27.2687 deg
Loaded 6863 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5389 out of 5623 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5623 out of 9308 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.3 pix Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
2.1 pix fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
2.1 pix fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.2 mag. Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.TwNiBvSzWZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=487, bad_region=0, passed=8496
Got 8496 stars (including 8005 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2292 through 0 to 8.6895, gap 8.6895 to 351.2292
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.2294 through 0 to 8.6896, gap 8.6896 to 351.2294
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8496 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.438 n_q1=1214 n_q2=1141 n_q3=1283 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.136
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.Fh6NAJxVUl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=597, bad_region=0, passed=9308
Got 9308 stars (including 8703 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9308 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1747 through 0 to 8.6909, gap 8.6909 to 351.1747
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1749 through 0 to 8.6906, gap 8.6906 to 351.1749
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9308 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.459 n_q1=1219 n_q2=1143 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1268 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits -region wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WzEfQpwOEz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=425, bad_region=0, passed=5999
Got 5999 stars (including 5563 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5999 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5733 through 0 to 9.1349, gap 9.1349 to 351.5733
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5735 through 0 to 9.1354, gap 9.1354 to 351.5735
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5999 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=11.201 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.434 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.328 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.913 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.312 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.328
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.298 n_q1=1252 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1152 n_q4=1188 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.053
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.aNW0Rz4N72 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=421, bad_region=0, passed=6013
Got 6013 stars (including 5583 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5733 through 0 to 9.1349, gap 9.1349 to 351.5733
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5735 through 0 to 9.1354, gap 9.1354 to 351.5735
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5398)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=11.227 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4909 robust_rms=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4909 robust_rms_before=0.898 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.295 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.293 n_q1=1265 n_q2=1312 n_q3=1150 n_q4=1182 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.417 worst_q_ratio=1.136
ref2=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.094
new1=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.053
new2=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits sigma_overall=0.315 worst_q_ratio=1.117
reference average sigma_overall=0.4215 worst_q_ratio=1.115
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4914 matched stars from wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406_astrometric_residuals.png (4909 matched stars from wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Peg-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21128_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 21128_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:49.79 +25:26:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07768_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 07768_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:00:06.68 +25:53:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Peg-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17
Second-epoch image center 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0748 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.055 +22:00:03.17
Second-epoch image center 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0721 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:17.977 +22:01:44.73
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:17.139 +22:01:47.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00335 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UagqqhlRDj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits &> /tmp/tmp.esZrbhPUvY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f0KMuVO9hb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yG1dl6jbUC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 49884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.1954 to 8.7302 deg, Dec +16.5689 to +27.2662 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.1954 to 8.7302 deg, Dec 16.5689 to 27.2662 deg
Loaded 6874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5205 out of 5737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5737 out of 49884 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.435600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.435600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 49884 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.1954 to 8.7302 deg, Dec +16.5689 to +27.2662 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.1954 to 8.7302 deg, Dec 16.5689 to 27.2662 deg
Loaded 6874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5205 out of 5737 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5737 out of 49884 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.9)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 52523 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.1747 to 8.6934 deg, Dec +16.5638 to +27.2712 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.1747 to 8.6934 deg, Dec 16.5638 to 27.2712 deg
Loaded 6866 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5145 out of 5746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5746 out of 52523 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 145 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.1 pix Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
2.0 pix fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
2.0 pix fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.4 mag. Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UagqqhlRDj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=2460, bad_region=0, passed=49866
Got 49866 stars (including 47351 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49866 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1954 through 0 to 8.7302, gap 8.7302 to 351.1954
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1956 through 0 to 8.7301, gap 8.7301 to 351.1956
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49866 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1234 n_q2=1162 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.esZrbhPUvY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits' -> 'wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=34, blended=2681, bad_region=1, passed=52489
Got 52489 stars (including 49734 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1747 through 0 to 8.6934, gap 8.6934 to 351.1747
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.1750 through 0 to 8.6932, gap 8.6932 to 351.1750
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 52489 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.455 n_q1=1239 n_q2=1159 n_q3=1246 n_q4=1259 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits -region wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.f0KMuVO9hb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1461, bad_region=15, passed=39886
Got 39886 stars (including 38355 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39886 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5462 through 0 to 9.1616, gap 9.1616 to 351.5462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5461 through 0 to 9.1621, gap 9.1621 to 351.5461
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=11.065 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.490 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4914 robust_rms=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4914 robust_rms_before=0.914 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.306 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.296 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.326 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.326 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1320 n_q3=1156 n_q4=1165 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.050
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yG1dl6jbUC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1400, bad_region=19, passed=39923
Got 39923 stars (including 38438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39923 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5390 through 0 to 9.1613, gap 9.1613 to 351.5390
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5385 through 0 to 9.1619, gap 9.1619 to 351.5385
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 39923 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=10.980 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.320 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.414 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.318 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.897 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.288 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.333 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.318
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.333 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1280 n_q2=1317 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits -region wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_052217_TTUQ1b1x1_3180959_EuxsQqwF/wcs_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Peg-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:29:47.99 +25:48:12.9: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:31:10.96 +21:45:59.9: 13.99 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:07:46.04 +23:13:20.6: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:18:31.21 +20:56:10.3: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:15:27.56 +16:52:51.2: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:43:13.29 +26:34:08.7: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:28:12.33 +22:03:37.7: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:03:01.29 +24:56:47.2: 13.85 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:09:08.47 +25:00:10.4: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:45:56.68 +26:58:44.7: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:15:27.56 +16:52:51.2: 13.84 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:18:31.21 +20:56:10.3: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:07:46.04 +23:13:20.6: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:43:13.29 +26:34:08.7: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:03:01.29 +24:56:47.2: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:31:10.96 +21:45:59.9: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:29:47.99 +25:48:12.9: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:28:12.33 +22:03:37.7: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:07:46.04 +23:13:20.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3567 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:31.21 +20:56:10.3: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6208 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:13.29 +26:34:08.7: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8344 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:27.56 +16:52:51.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9806 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:47.99 +25:48:12.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8717 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:03:01.29 +24:56:47.2: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2220 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:12.33 +22:03:37.7: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7790 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:10.96 +21:45:59.9: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9930 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:09:08.47 +25:00:10.4: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:45:56.68 +26:58:44.7: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:09:08.47 +25:00:10.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3857 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:56.68 +26:58:44.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5803 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:55:41.38 +18:22:54.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:25:44.38 +16:46:45.0: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:21:30.87 +17:40:03.1: 11.80 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:30:20.77 +17:03:11.5: 13.11 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:15:17.03 +20:17:19.0: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:30:33.93 +22:08:08.4: 10.24 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:55:41.38 +18:22:54.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:41.38 +18:22:54.6: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3859 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:25:44.38 +16:46:45.0: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:44.38 +16:46:45.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1944 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:30:33.93 +22:08:08.4: 10.28 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:30:20.77 +17:03:11.5: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:15:17.03 +20:17:19.0: 12.33 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:21:30.87 +17:40:03.1: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.26 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:20.77 +17:03:11.5: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9275 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.36 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:33.93 +22:08:08.4: ref_mag=10.26 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.4425 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:17.03 +20:17:19.0: ref_mag=12.36 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6579 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:30.87 +17:40:03.1: ref_mag=11.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0614 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:01:30.73 +26:19:45.9: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:32:17.38 +25:50:07.9: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:33:31.17 +22:27:31.4: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:01:30.73 +26:19:45.9: 16.00 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:21:26.55 +17:21:03.3: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:28:11.78 +25:55:50.2: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:32:17.38 +25:50:07.9: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:32:17.38 +25:50:07.9: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4259 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:33:31.17 +22:27:31.4: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:31.17 +22:27:31.4: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3364 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:58:52.77 +25:27:27.6: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:21:26.55 +17:21:03.3: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:28:11.78 +25:55:50.2: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:28:11.78 +25:55:50.2: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0014 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:58:52.77 +25:27:27.6: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:58:52.77 +25:27:27.6: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2059 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:39:22.57 +24:43:46.3: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:38:01.03 +23:14:27.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:53:49.41 +19:07:33.8: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:27:22.51 +18:47:14.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:30:36.67 +22:39:15.5: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:39:22.57 +24:43:46.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:38:01.03 +23:14:27.6: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:22.57 +24:43:46.3: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4093 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:01.03 +23:14:27.6: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4235 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:53:49.41 +19:07:33.8: 16.03 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:27:22.51 +18:47:14.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:22.51 +18:47:14.7: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5607 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:50:15.20 +23:47:30.8: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:18:25.09 +26:07:47.7: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:30:36.67 +22:39:15.5: 13.39 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:36.67 +22:39:15.5: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5143 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:50:15.20 +23:47:30.8: 13.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:15.20 +23:47:30.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6260 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:18:25.09 +26:07:47.7: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:25.09 +26:07:47.7: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6855 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:45:44.41 +26:07:22.2: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:45:44.41 +26:07:22.2: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:44.41 +26:07:22.2: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7951 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:24:00.97 +18:06:50.7: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:57:56.55 +25:07:27.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:38:49.87 +24:36:19.1: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:33:13.74 +26:26:22.9: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:24:00.97 +18:06:50.7: 14.07 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:57:56.55 +25:07:27.3: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.08 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:00.97 +18:06:50.7: ref_mag=14.08 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8615 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:56.55 +25:07:27.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8584 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:38:49.87 +24:36:19.1: 13.76 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:49.87 +24:36:19.1: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8734 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:42:05.35 +24:42:42.7: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:33:13.74 +26:26:22.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:13.74 +26:26:22.9: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8777 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:03:43.95 +18:21:12.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:42:05.35 +24:42:42.7: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:05.35 +24:42:42.7: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9449 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:40:35.02 +22:29:32.0: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:03:43.95 +18:21:12.3: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:51:35.88 +24:17:54.3: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:40:35.02 +22:29:32.0: 13.96 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:35.02 +22:29:32.0: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9439 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:33:01.91 +26:40:48.6: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:51:35.88 +24:17:54.3: 13.79 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:35.88 +24:17:54.3: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9477 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:00:44.76 +23:31:26.2: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:33:01.91 +26:40:48.6: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:01.91 +26:40:48.6: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9136 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:30:42.76 +16:47:41.3: 14.67 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:00:44.76 +23:31:26.2: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:44.76 +23:31:26.2: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1047 delta=-0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:33:11.16 +24:23:00.9: 13.83 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:30:42.76 +16:47:41.3: 14.96 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.76 +16:47:41.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.1340 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:33:11.16 +24:23:00.9: 14.02 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:11.16 +24:23:00.9: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8472 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:29:14.96 +17:11:09.4: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:33:43.24 +23:59:12.2: 14.63 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:02:07.97 +23:25:31.0: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:28:49.91 +16:40:43.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:28:49.91 +16:40:43.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:49.91 +16:40:43.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:29:14.96 +17:11:09.4: 14.47 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:14.96 +17:11:09.4: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2085 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:33:43.24 +23:59:12.2: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:43.24 +23:59:12.2: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3503 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:33:10.01 +25:55:40.9: 14.43 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:02:07.97 +23:25:31.0: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:02:07.97 +23:25:31.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2044 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:27:51.43 +18:21:30.6: 14.56 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:33:10.01 +25:55:40.9: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:10.01 +25:55:40.9: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3869 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:27:51.43 +18:21:30.6: 14.80 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:51.43 +18:21:30.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3873 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:30:58.19 +16:52:24.0: 14.38 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:39:15.18 +25:50:26.9: 14.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:28:30.05 +17:53:24.8: 14.83 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:30:58.19 +16:52:24.0: 14.50 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:58.19 +16:52:24.0: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4294 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:39:15.18 +25:50:26.9: 14.84 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:15.18 +25:50:26.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4253 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:28:30.05 +17:53:24.8: 14.49 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:30.05 +17:53:24.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3378 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:42:45.64 +24:50:28.1: 14.79 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:31:00.11 +21:13:36.0: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:42:45.64 +24:50:28.1: 14.71 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:45.64 +24:50:28.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5807 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:08:48.18 +24:49:20.9: 15.23 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:50:53.85 +24:48:49.1: 14.98 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 23:47:52.78 +23:56:06.3: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:08:48.18 +24:49:20.9: 15.09 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.14 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:08:48.18 +24:49:20.9: ref_mag=15.14 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.8024 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:50:53.85 +24:48:49.1: 15.11 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.04 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:50:53.85 +24:48:49.1: ref_mag=15.04 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7118 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-17_05-23-21_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 00:29:01.85 +16:51:30.3: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 23:47:52.78 +23:56:06.3: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_04-02-11_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0930.fits at 00:29:01.85 +16:51:30.3: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:01.85 +16:51:30.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1226 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47941.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55889.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out55952.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56312.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out56635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 18s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55601_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55601_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55606_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55606_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55610_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55610_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55614_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55614_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:22:22.68 +19:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55615_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55615_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55616_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55616_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55617_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55617_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55618_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55618_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55619_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55619_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55621_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55621_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:29:09.55 +26:03:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55622_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55622_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55623_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55623_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55624_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55624_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55626_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55626_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55627_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55627_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:06:59.06 +25:51:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55628_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55628_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55629_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55629_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55630_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55630_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:31:10.90 +23:48:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55631_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55631_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55633_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55633_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55697_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55697_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55775_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55775_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55790_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55790_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:33:49.80 +25:26:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55795_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55795_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55822_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55822_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55825_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55825_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55828_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55828_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55871_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55871_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55889_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 55889_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55901_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55901_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55930_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55930_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55934_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55934_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55935_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55935_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55952_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 55952_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55964_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55964_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55971_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55971_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55990_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 55990_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56001_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56001_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56064_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56064_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56108_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56108_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56112_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56112_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56121_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56121_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56170_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56170_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56177_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56177_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56200_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56200_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56212_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56212_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56217_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56217_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56244_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56244_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56266_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56266_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56273_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56273_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56285_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56285_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56294_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56294_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56310_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56310_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56312_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 56312_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56327_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56327_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56342_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56342_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56348_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56348_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56361_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56361_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56364_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56364_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56387_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56387_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56392_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56392_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56396_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56396_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56397_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56397_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56400_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56400_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56412_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56412_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56413_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56413_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56414_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56414_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56442_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56442_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56450_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56450_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56455_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56455_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56485_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56497_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56497_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56507_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56507_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:31:15.82 +26:28:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56509_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56509_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56512_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56512_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56519_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56519_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:28:10.77 +25:55:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56532_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56532_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:27:43.48 +25:11:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56534_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56534_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56548_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56548_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56559_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56559_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56573_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56573_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56597_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56597_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56598_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56598_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56616_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56616_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56620_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56620_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56622_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56622_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56635_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 56635_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56640_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56640_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56647_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56647_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56661_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56661_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:30:44.01 +19:44:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56667_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56667_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56670_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56670_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56675_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56675_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:28:17.88 +25:59:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56677_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56677_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56682_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56682_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56688_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56688_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56690_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56690_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56692_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56692_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56696_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56696_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56704_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56704_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56707_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56707_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56721_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56721_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56726_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56726_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56735_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56735_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56738_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56738_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:33:30.99 +23:14:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56766_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56766_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56780_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56780_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56798_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56798_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56807_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56807_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:36:52.55 +21:42:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56812_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56812_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56840_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56840_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56865_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56865_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56873_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56873_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56878_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56878_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56881_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56881_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56890_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56890_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56910_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56910_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56919_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56919_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56920_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56920_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56923_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56923_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56955_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56955_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56969_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56969_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56982_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56982_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56986_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56986_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56999_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 56999_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57017_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57017_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57019_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57019_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57030_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57030_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57034_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57034_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57041_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57041_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57083_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57083_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57084_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57084_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57088_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57088_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57089_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 57089_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57092_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57092_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57098_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57098_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57102_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57102_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57143_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57143_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57157_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57157_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57167_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57167_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57177_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57177_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57187_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 57187_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47941_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
Preparing report for the candidate 47941_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00776_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 00776_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34173_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406
The candidate 34173_fd_Peg-04-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_04-45-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0406 did not pass the final checks
