######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMi-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMi-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMi-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 231377 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 231377 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits_preview.png'
UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits

renamed 'UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits_preview.png'
UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 522.6192
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 519.1383
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1942.5910
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 522.6041
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1940.3174
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 524.3540
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.71703
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.003
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-03T01:01:53.8171480' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-03T06:01:53.8171480' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61286.2513173264 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-03T06:02:03.7177268' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61286.2514319099 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 215.996093571301 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996135844792 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.6577777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 340.085 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.47947276180602 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 24 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.4 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 36.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.7 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 5.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/d_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits :)
Spent 0.526425 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/d_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-09-03T01:02:37.7145640' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-03T06:02:37.7145640' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61286.2518253936 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-03T06:02:47.6165206' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61286.2519399999 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 215.996093693529 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 69.9996136134937 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.6058333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 340.124166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.48455120950159 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '14 24 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29508 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 899.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 10.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 5.400432 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/d_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits :)
Spent 0.502698 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/d_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits

fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461286.75143307
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0283 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61
Second-epoch second image center 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00574 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.49bFMJya3K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.au6wgaeoBT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VFKTrF41rn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IiVNk56pdv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6716 to +75.2389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6716 to 75.2389 deg
Loaded 8088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4821 out of 4988 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4988 out of 7945 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.737600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.737600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6716 to +75.2389 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9719 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6716 to 75.2389 deg
Loaded 8088 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4821 out of 4988 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4988 out of 7945 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (aperture=6.5)
Read 7905 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9736 to 243.8628 deg, Dec +63.6717 to +75.2223 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9736 to 243.8628 deg, Dec 63.6717 to 75.2223 deg
Loaded 8080 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4832 out of 4997 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4997 out of 7905 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
2.4 pix UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
15.2 mag. UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.49bFMJya3K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=497, bad_region=0, passed=7945
Got 7945 stars (including 7439 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7945 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7945 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.478 n_q1=1388 n_q2=1187 n_q3=1242 n_q4=1077 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.au6wgaeoBT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=492, bad_region=0, passed=7905
Got 7905 stars (including 7405 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7905 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.7 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1382 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1077 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VFKTrF41rn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=210, bad_region=0, passed=3631
Got 3631 stars (including 3418 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3347 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3341 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3341 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3341 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3348 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3342 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3342 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 3342 stars left (next iteration limit 3675)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3342 robust_rms=10.900 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3342 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.611 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3342 robust_rms=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3342 robust_rms_before=0.820 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.334 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.403 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.403 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=3342 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.418 n_q1=879 n_q2=798 n_q3=918 n_q4=747 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.IiVNk56pdv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=207, bad_region=0, passed=3655
Got 3655 stars (including 3443 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3655 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3374 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3365 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3365 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3365 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3374 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3364 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3655 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3364 stars left (next iteration limit 3701)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3364 robust_rms=10.664 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.033 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3364 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.559 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3364 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3364 robust_rms_before=0.787 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.326 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.405 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.405 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits N_match=3364 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=899 n_q2=804 n_q3=934 n_q4=727 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.240
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits sigma_overall=0.397 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits sigma_overall=0.399 worst_q_ratio=1.250
new1=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.272
new2=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.240
reference average sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.2275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659_astrometric_residuals.png (4894 matched stars from wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197_astrometric_residuals.png (3342 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198_astrometric_residuals.png (3364 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0283 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 14:24:01.593 +69:59:33.71
Second-epoch image center 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0340 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 14:24:01.705 +70:01:15.61
Second-epoch second image center 14:24:01.234 +70:01:36.14
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00574 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bL6tGLDS6y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3r3Syr3kcK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HiMPgprCcu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.v9mnCZcGFQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits and wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 41527 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9292 to 244.1268 deg, Dec +63.6486 to +75.2502 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9292 to 244.1268 deg, Dec 63.6486 to 75.2502 deg
Loaded 8148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4639 out of 5092 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5092 out of 41527 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.623600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.623600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 41527 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9292 to 244.1268 deg, Dec +63.6486 to +75.2502 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9292 to 244.1268 deg, Dec 63.6486 to 75.2502 deg
Loaded 8148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4639 out of 5092 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5092 out of 41527 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 41453 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 187.9737 to 244.1235 deg, Dec +63.6500 to +75.2475 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 187.9737 to 244.1235 deg, Dec 63.6500 to 75.2475 deg
Loaded 8143 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4637 out of 5095 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5095 out of 41453 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 41 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
2.2 pix UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
14.2 mag. fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.bL6tGLDS6y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2144, bad_region=0, passed=41506
Got 41506 stars (including 39316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41506 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41506 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1236 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3r3Syr3kcK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=2188, bad_region=0, passed=41424
Got 41424 stars (including 39195 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 768 to 828 (Dec 63.6 to 75.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1169 n_q3=1235 n_q4=1089 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits -region wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.HiMPgprCcu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=577, bad_region=5, passed=21646
Got 21646 stars (including 21029 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21646 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=9.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.828 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.400 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.410 n_q1=1381 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1357 n_q4=997 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.207
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.v9mnCZcGFQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=524, bad_region=5, passed=21832
Got 21832 stars (including 21262 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4889 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4889 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.3 to 75.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5377)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=9.351 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.875 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=0.788 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.342 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.378 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.460
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.408 n_q1=1426 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1350 n_q4=976 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/wcs_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 13:08:31.59 +72:09:40.6: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 13:04:48.17 +73:36:04.1: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 14:34:18.50 +66:48:09.4: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 13:56:37.10 +74:46:03.7: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 13:04:48.17 +73:36:04.1: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 13:08:31.59 +72:09:40.6: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:48.17 +73:36:04.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1455 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:08:31.59 +72:09:40.6: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1193 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 14:34:18.50 +66:48:09.4: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:18.50 +66:48:09.4: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7158 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 13:56:37.10 +74:46:03.7: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:56:37.10 +74:46:03.7: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0399 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 14:50:30.70 +67:50:41.8: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-48-47_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0659.fits at 12:40:32.43 +73:23:50.1: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 14:50:30.70 +67:50:41.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:50:30.70 +67:50:41.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9031 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-04-19_03-49-38_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0660.fits at 12:40:32.43 +73:23:50.1: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:40:32.43 +73:23:50.1: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2710 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52951_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 52951_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 13.38 | 13:08:31.56 +72:09:39.3 | 8348 1594 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.02 | 13:08:31.62 +72:09:41.9 | 8348 1597 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52953_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 52953_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 13.14 | 13:04:48.13 +73:36:04.7 | 8295 0704 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.16 | 13:04:48.21 +73:36:03.5 | 8295 0708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 52994_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 10.30 | 15:47:50.81 +68:05:53.5 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53068_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.26 | 14:22:50.41 +72:50:48.9 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53074_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.15 | 13:04:24.42 +71:51:26.7 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53092_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.61 | 15:29:24.64 +72:40:56.8 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53101_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53101_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.59 | 14:12:21.81 +66:22:28.3 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53110_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53110_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.68 | 14:05:31.60 +72:32:30.7 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53138_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.90 | 15:08:34.34 +64:33:34.3 | 1701 6045 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
**** FOUND 15:08:34.32 +64:33:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53178_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53178_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.13 | 15:41:52.61 +71:22:25.7 | 1196 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53181_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53181_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 11.89 | 12:56:30.37 +70:54:22.6 | 9112 2176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53185_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53185_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.06 | 14:29:12.35 +75:07:12.5 | 4798 0111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53269_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53269_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.31 | 12:56:07.81 +72:46:34.2 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53270_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53270_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.73 | 16:08:30.99 +72:57:49.8 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53332_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53332_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 12.76 | 14:34:18.57 +66:48:09.8 | 4049 5076 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.68 | 14:34:18.43 +66:48:09.0 | 4048 5079 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53383_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53383_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.82 | 14:25:21.87 +64:57:02.5 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53401_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53401_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.02 | 15:06:46.35 +67:40:18.6 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53430_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53430_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 12.99 | 13:56:37.20 +74:46:04.0 | 6072 0347 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.10 | 13:56:37.00 +74:46:03.3 | 6071 0350 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53447_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53447_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.14 | 13:23:49.16 +68:42:15.1 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53464_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53464_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.00 | 14:50:24.86 +74:12:41.1 | 3886 0544 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
**** FOUND 14:50:24.99 +74:12:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53479_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53479_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.69 | 15:36:33.10 +66:21:24.0 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53546_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53546_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.70 | 15:35:28.73 +72:28:32.0 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53582_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53582_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.94 | 15:40:25.17 +66:35:05.0 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53626_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53626_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.77 | 15:40:50.91 +67:27:49.2 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53643_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.74 | 15:36:15.93 +65:52:06.9 | 0250 4763 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53644_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53644_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.86 | 15:53:20.66 +69:50:00.6 | 0284 2160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53658_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53658_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 14.09 | 16:00:55.58 +70:48:31.5 | 0189 1455 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53660_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53660_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.98 | 15:46:22.81 +68:03:42.9 | 0193 3299 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53681_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53681_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 14.15 | 15:37:48.15 +68:26:07.7 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53686_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53686_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.58 | 13:11:15.01 +72:25:08.3 | 8188 1476 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53703_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53703_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.72 | 14:38:39.03 +66:54:47.8 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53709_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53709_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.53 | 15:30:07.00 +68:18:00.9 | 1110 3496 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53713_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53713_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.75 | 15:56:45.94 +73:15:43.1 | 1029 0203 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53725_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53725_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.89 | 14:18:09.14 +67:10:56.3 | 5014 4923 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53726_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53726_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.80 | 14:51:28.95 +73:10:21.6 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53730_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53730_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.95 | 15:38:13.42 +70:12:51.9 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53740_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53740_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 13.98 | 14:50:30.44 +67:50:42.2 | 3208 4321 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 13.86 | 14:50:30.97 +67:50:41.4 | 3207 4324 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53746_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 53746_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 14.06 | 15:05:39.78 +73:39:36.4 | 3193 0737 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00901_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 00901_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 03.25143 | 2461286.75143 | 12.27 | 12:40:32.47 +73:23:50.0 | 9344 0492 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-01-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0197.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.27 | 12:40:32.38 +73:23:50.2 | 9343 0495 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18254_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 18254_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 12.20 | 14:00:06.59 +70:40:12.7 | 6005 2830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34626_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198
The candidate 34626_fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 03.25194 | 2461286.75194 | 8.07 | 14:17:19.98 +66:47:39.2 | 5052 5159 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-03_CI_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_033416_TTUQ1b1x1_1161502_pfmMyAN0/fd_UMi-02-Q1b1x1_2026-09-03_01-02-37_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0198.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:19.97 +66:47:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMi-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461286.75143307 -observatory V36
11:12:36.07 +06:38:03.6 Mercury (-1.2mag)
13:25:26.93 -12:56:03.7 Venus (-4.6mag)
07:02:59.36 +23:13:02.5 Mars (1.2mag)
09:05:41.29 +17:11:38.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:52:37.78 +02:45:03.4 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:36.49 +21:01:47.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:07.33 -00:00:41.0 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:25:52.98 -23:38:38.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
03:33:58.84 +23:58:26.7 Moon (-10.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Sep 3 03:36 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461286.75143307:
09:05:47.72 +17:11:08.7 Io (6.2mag)
09:05:45.29 +17:11:20.3 Europa (6.3mag)
09:05:29.85 +17:12:36.9 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:05:31.14 +17:12:26.7 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:03:20.39 +17:26:15.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:05:45.75 +17:11:18.6 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:02:59.50 +17:20:31.5 Elara (17.7mag)
09:09:40.03 +16:40:30.0 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:07:03.84 +17:28:19.5 Carme (19.0mag)
00:52:49.56 +02:44:55.7 Titan (8.3mag)
00:52:33.58 +02:44:48.7 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:53:02.64 +02:47:45.8 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:52:37.87 +02:44:19.9 Hyperion (14.3mag)
00:51:28.88 +02:35:11.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Sep 3 03:36 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461286.75143307:
21:33:20.14 -03:09:28.3 JWST
11:13:39.78 +46:25:32.9 Chandra
10:17:03.83 -56:58:50.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Sep 3 03:36 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461286.75143307 -observatory V36
03:37:49.68 +19:08:31.1 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:39.52 -34:17:04.0 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:16:20.65 -70:04:56.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:15:10.75 +33:35:48.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:45:04.07 +44:50:24.2 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:45:04.11 +44:50:24.1 15.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:16:45.57 +29:08:53.4 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:07:01.65 +26:03:19.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:45:45.59 +27:22:32.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:46:04.85 +05:15:14.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:30:47.93 -15:17:35.4 14.8mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:34:45.81 +32:39:03.7 15.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:06:09.46 +15:22:13.7 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:36:22.96 +43:18:42.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:31:49.65 +49:29:12.0 17.4mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:33:21.26 -12:58:38.1 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:10:07.50 +19:20:36.1 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:11:32.08 +19:04:52.0 16.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:16:21.33 +00:26:22.4 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:31:31.25 +74:40:13.0 16.2mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:07:31.91 +46:14:23.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:09:32.78 +10:56:59.2 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:22:38.99 -34:39:26.7 13.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:45:28.58 -05:10:03.7 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
12:00:25.22 -03:48:31.8 17.6mag 63P/Wild
00:46:47.36 -06:48:42.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:31:22.61 +19:32:44.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:44.44 +14:55:46.9 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:24:56.23 +27:04:21.9 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:19:38.92 +25:48:41.5 17.9mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:18:48.77 +21:42:56.2 14.8mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:37:46.09 -19:54:56.8 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:12:24.95 +20:45:27.0 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:54:24.06 +02:35:02.1 17.3mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
02:45:46.10 -17:59:48.4 15.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:47:38.42 +16:39:05.1 11.9mag 169P/NEAT
03:20:41.43 +08:46:53.2 14.4mag 220P/McNaught
04:36:59.99 +35:01:07.9 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:20:53.27 +36:06:38.0 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:22:41.90 +00:12:24.8 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:24:16.09 +17:03:28.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.0K Sep 3 03:36 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
19:45:06.20 +18:22:48.80 V488 2026-08-30.13 9.37
18:25:12.74 -22:25:28.60 V8055 2026-08-30.22 10.89
17:17:45.96 +64:31:40.10 ASASSN-26ez 2026-08-25.13 10.87
19:02:47.09 +58:08:21.00 AT2026zwo 2026-08-24.16 15.78
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.89 +49:28:51.30 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.24 17.09
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Sep 3 03:36 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Sep 3 03:36 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
02:37:50.952 -34:56:23.02 AT 2026yei 2026-08-07.75 20.24
00:49:13.568 +35:33:39.77 AT 2026yeh 2026-08-07.46 18.6935
00:51:29.158 +58:43:46.50 AT 2026yeg 2026-06-27.59 18.302
23:39:55.450 +21:19:37.52 SN 2026yef 2026-08-07.52 18.408
02:33:45.113 +13:18:25.70 SN 2026yee 2026-08-07.60 19.123
23:58:58.059 +31:26:23.87 AT 2026yed 2026-08-07.54 19.075
00:30:10.856 +35:23:23.27 SN 2026yec 2026-08-07.55 18.551
21:31:13.865 -31:52:55.42 AT 2026yeb 2026-08-06.61 20.01
22:05:14.663 -13:18:47.83 AT 2026yea 2026-08-04.51 20.14
20:28:43.809 -29:28:49.69 AT 2026ydz 2026-08-03.55 19.71
22:22:26.994 -02:53:12.42 SN 2026ydy 2026-08-06.36 20.1587
01:08:44.199 +44:24:53.07 AT 2026ydx 2026-08-03.37 19.6807
00:16:28.015 +46:52:44.67 AT 2026ydw 2026-08-03.38 19.8888
01:57:01.783 +28:37:00.66 AT 2026ydv 2026-08-03.43 20.3644
07:03:59.165 +50:34:37.94 AT 2026ydu 2026-08-05.50 19.1479
14:59:48.320 +41:11:10.54 AT 2026ydt 2026-08-03.62 19.92
15:30:50.100 +44:50:29.55 AT 2026yds 2026-08-03.62 20.66
21:51:45.360 +12:57:42.97 AT 2026ydr 2026-08-02.66 19.56
15:18:51.860 +43:23:37.95 AT 2026ydq 2026-07-22.66 21.65
22:00:26.940 +23:38:48.49 AT 2026ydp 2026-07-18.74 21.04
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Sep 3 03:36 tns_transients_list.txt