This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.2174 2461284.7174 12.89 20:57:34.65 -12:37:56.9
35.55327 -33.63730 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda -0 0 0 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:57:34.65 -12:37:56.9: 15.48 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:57:34.65 -12:37:56.9: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.7174,12.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.2174 12.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.2174 2461284.7174 13.30 20:36:30.89 -09:44:57.8
36.05299 -27.73783 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 -0 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:30.89 -09:44:57.8: 15.87 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:30.89 -09:44:57.8: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.2174* 20 36 30.89 -09 44 57.8 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.7174,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.2174 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.2174 2461284.7174 13.38 20:04:41.09 -07:17:50.1
34.69951 -19.58929 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos -1 0 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:04:41.09 -07:17:50.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:04:41.09 -07:17:50.1: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.7174,13.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.2174 13.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.2174 2461284.7174 13.71 20:44:45.88 -05:23:24.7
41.48759 -27.60237 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.582 Olympia -1 -0 1 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:44:45.88 -05:23:24.7: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:44:45.88 -05:23:24.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.7174,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.2174 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.2174 2461284.7174 13.69 20:07:20.55 -12:37:07.3
29.84692 -22.45924 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -3 -1 3 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:07:20.55 -12:37:07.3: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:07:20.55 -12:37:07.3: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 09 01.2174* 20 07 20.55 -12 37 07.3 13.7 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.7174,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.2174 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461284.71765311 01.09.2026 05:13:15.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13594
Objects passed selection criteria: 13549
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11269
Average stars matched: 11037 (97.9413 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 00:17:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461284.71765311 01.09.2026 05:13:15.229 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 122
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 46 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 88976
Objects passed selection criteria: 88853
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81749.8
Average stars matched: 79452 (97.1893 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 585100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Sep 1 00:19:40 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461284.71707513
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:26.252 -10:00:41.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:26.252 -10:00:41.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0539 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:23.743 -10:00:19.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:23.743 -10:00:19.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0423 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:26.252 -10:00:41.26
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:23.743 -10:00:19.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01192 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t3I7qRAd75
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VN5cIw4SdZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cUpbzqDqJV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LOarBS39vh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.t3I7qRAd75 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.VN5cIw4SdZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cUpbzqDqJV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=496, bad_region=0, passed=8200
Got 8200 stars (including 7691 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8200 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8200 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=10.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.219 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.851 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.309 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.342 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.350
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.342 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1412 n_q3=1003 n_q4=1262 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LOarBS39vh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, bad_region=0, passed=8224
Got 8224 stars (including 7708 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8224 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8224 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=9.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.755 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.545 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.356 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.832 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.323 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.343 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.356
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.343 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.327 n_q1=1053 n_q2=1413 n_q3=1133 n_q4=1277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits sigma_overall=0.316 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits sigma_overall=0.330 worst_q_ratio=1.047
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184_astrometric_residuals.png (4880 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-12-25_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0184.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-09-01_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_001406_TTUQ1b1x1_3694113_7bjjXED5/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.8: 10.20 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.8: 10.18 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.19 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.91 -07:47:31.8: ref_mag=10.19 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.5112 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 20865_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 20883_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.07 -06:09:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 20891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.51 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 20445_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.26 -13:18:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.68 -06:36:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 00299_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:49:56.35 -05:08:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113603_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113603_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113613_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113619_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113621_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113625_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113636_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113636_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113639_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113642_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113648_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113649_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113651_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113651_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113652_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113654_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113658_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113659_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113659_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113664_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113665_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:40.25 -06:34:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113666_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:09.43 -06:24:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113667_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113669_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113677_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113678_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113679_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113684_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113685_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113687_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113688_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113688_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113691_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113691_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113692_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113695_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113695_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:21.38 -05:49:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113700_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113701_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113701_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:30.66 -09:43:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113702_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113702_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113704_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113704_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113706_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113708_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:09:42.09 -05:24:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113710_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113711_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113714_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113714_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113717_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113720_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113723_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113723_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113725_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:51.06 -08:29:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113726_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113726_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113728_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113729_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113730_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:46.27 -11:16:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113732_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113733_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:57.78 -10:22:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113734_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113739_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113740_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113741_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113794_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.65 -08:56:56.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113813_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113813_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.65 -12:35:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113814_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113814_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113817_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113817_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113828_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113828_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113850_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113850_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113854_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 113854_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113867_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.39 -09:28:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113890_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113898_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113898_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.19 -07:01:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113907_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 113909_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113911_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113911_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 113924_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113925_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113928_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:14:28.13 -06:01:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113933_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113937_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113937_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:53.97 -07:43:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113940_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113940_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113946_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113946_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113948_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113955_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 113955_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113957_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
Preparing report for the candidate 113957_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113968_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113968_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113974_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113974_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:20:26.66 -06:23:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113977_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113977_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113979_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113979_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113985_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113985_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 113986_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:14.25 -06:29:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114006_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114006_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114026_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114026_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114033_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114033_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114036_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114036_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114037_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114037_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:15.42 -05:43:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114054_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114054_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:06:24.73 -07:54:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114068_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114068_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114069_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114069_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114087_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114087_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114093_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114093_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114101_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114101_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114103_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114103_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114127_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114127_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114146_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 114146_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 67884_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:51:28.77 -14:39:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.08 -06:09:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.52 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:32:28.21 -05:17:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.86 -12:46:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.30 -13:18:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.58 -14:47:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.33 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.63 -06:36:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185
The candidate 01709_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-09-01_00-13-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0185 did not pass the final checks
