######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 600900 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 600900 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits

renamed 'UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits_preview.png'
UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.9575
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 445.9569
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2184.9208
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 570.2136
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2135.0175
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 549.6892
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.95495
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.037
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-31T23:25:43.1767458' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-01T04:25:43.1767458' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61284.1845275001 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-01T04:25:53.0786507' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61284.1846421063 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.710794824169 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999954473686 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.3866666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 328.969722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.32249675530588 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 27.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 328.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits :)
Spent 1.004274 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-31T23:26:26.3327613' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-09-01T04:26:26.3327613' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61284.1850269907 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-09-01T04:26:36.2333733' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61284.1851415858 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 205.710794902877 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999954739863 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 25.3080555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 329.009722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.32915979944043 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29516 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 9.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 38.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 902.0 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 328.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits :)
Spent 1.064726 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/d_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits

fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461284.68464324
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0529 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.alBXQlps2y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3h0m6sMbvs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZSeii5pakz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EI3vxQLOmj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.660400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.660400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.48
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2617 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6060 to 224.9754 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2617 deg
Loaded 6074 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3959 out of 4068 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4068 out of 6503 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec +55.8887 to +67.2580 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.6066 to 224.9768 deg, Dec 55.8887 to 67.2580 deg
Loaded 6076 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3951 out of 4074 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4074 out of 6522 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.4 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.2 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.0 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
14.1 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.alBXQlps2y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=380, bad_region=0, passed=6503
Got 6503 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6503 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.366 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.3h0m6sMbvs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=400, bad_region=0, passed=6522
Got 6522 stars (including 6118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6522 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.364 n_q1=1276 n_q2=1286 n_q3=1172 n_q4=1150 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZSeii5pakz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=0, passed=3129
Got 3129 stars (including 2925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3129 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3128 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2854 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3129 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 2854 stars left (next iteration limit 3139)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2854 robust_rms=10.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2854 robust_rms=0.531 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.758 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2854 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2854 robust_rms_before=0.887 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.651
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=2854 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.425 n_q1=799 n_q2=562 n_q3=818 n_q4=675 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.181
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.EI3vxQLOmj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=214, bad_region=0, passed=3336
Got 3336 stars (including 3116 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3336 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3037 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3035 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3035 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3035 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3038 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3035 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3035 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 3035 stars left (next iteration limit 3338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3035 robust_rms=10.127 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.043 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3035 robust_rms=0.566 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.746 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3035 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3035 robust_rms_before=0.898 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.345 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.419 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.612
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.419 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=3035 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.424 n_q1=837 n_q2=662 n_q3=827 n_q4=709 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.153
ref2=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits sigma_overall=0.383 worst_q_ratio=1.123
new1=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits sigma_overall=0.360 worst_q_ratio=1.181
new2=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.228
reference average sigma_overall=0.3795 worst_q_ratio=1.138
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179_astrometric_residuals.png (4882 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180_astrometric_residuals.png (4884 matched stars from wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138_astrometric_residuals.png (2854 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139_astrometric_residuals.png (3035 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05035_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 05035_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 11.62 | 14:17:06.99 +58:57:32.7 | 2054 4703 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:06.94 +58:57:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00695_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 00695_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 9.85 | 12:37:46.08 +65:33:20.5 | 9024 0798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 12:37:46.06 +65:33:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0529 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Image size: 941.7'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 13:42:47.980 +62:00:28.61
Second-epoch image center 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0552 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 13:43:14.140 +62:01:16.69
Second-epoch second image center 13:43:14.615 +62:01:34.94
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00515 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gQYkMzVVB0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bHQnDXLziJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yiv1cSYfw3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hk0UkyjMws
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits and wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.540000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.540000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 33815 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec +55.8938 to +67.2697 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3029 to 225.2621 deg, Dec 55.8938 to 67.2697 deg
Loaded 6170 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3809 out of 4122 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4122 out of 33815 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 33636 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec +55.8888 to +67.2587 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 186.3037 to 225.2618 deg, Dec 55.8888 to 67.2587 deg
Loaded 6169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3802 out of 4121 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4121 out of 33636 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
2.2 pix UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
14.3 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
14.4 mag. fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gQYkMzVVB0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1409, bad_region=1, passed=33795
Got 33795 stars (including 32344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33795 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33795 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.360 n_q1=1267 n_q2=1311 n_q3=1124 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bHQnDXLziJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=1410, bad_region=0, passed=33603
Got 33603 stars (including 32157 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33603 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 55.9 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33603 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1271 n_q2=1315 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1168 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.125
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits -region wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.yiv1cSYfw3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=544, bad_region=2, passed=18044
Got 18044 stars (including 17476 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18044 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4872 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18044 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4872 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=8.775 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.676 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.789 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4872 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.674 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4872 robust_rms_before=0.907 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.444 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.674
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits N_match=4872 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1450 n_q2=942 n_q3=1417 n_q4=1063 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.hk0UkyjMws (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=578, bad_region=5, passed=18957
Got 18957 stars (including 18348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18957 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18957 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=8.727 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.702 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.582 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.737 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.920 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.454 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.615
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.454 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1405 n_q2=1074 n_q3=1350 n_q4=1045 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.204
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/wcs_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:39:22.40 +62:11:28.7: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:34:12.90 +56:31:09.4: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 12:43:40.58 +57:34:42.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:39:22.40 +62:11:28.7: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:39:22.40 +62:11:28.7: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7902 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:34:12.90 +56:31:09.4: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:34:12.90 +56:31:09.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7578 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-10-53_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0179.fits at 14:17:03.90 +63:48:03.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 12:43:40.58 +57:34:42.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:43:40.58 +57:34:42.8: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-06-08_01-11-46_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0180.fits at 14:17:03.90 +63:48:03.0: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:03.90 +63:48:03.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8738 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52248_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 01.18464 | 2461284.68464 | 13.03 | 12:39:22.23 +62:11:27.5 | 9291 2829 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.71 | 12:39:22.57 +62:11:29.9 | 9291 2832 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52249_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52249_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.84 | 14:40:33.92 +63:35:11.6 | 1060 1576 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:40:33.74 +63:35:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52250_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.90 | 14:30:48.18 +62:45:37.5 | 1576 2239 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:30:48.04 +62:45:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52251_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.86 | 14:09:08.04 +63:41:41.5 | 3139 1993 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:09:08.11 +63:41:41.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52252_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52252_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.88 | 14:34:36.34 +56:20:14.9 | 0290 5948 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:34:36.34 +56:20:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52285_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 10.68 | 14:46:09.06 +60:30:39.4 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52342_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 11.42 | 13:42:21.57 +64:50:44.6 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52348_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 11.18 | 12:46:49.73 +64:10:51.1 | 8582 1727 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52363_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52363_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 11.79 | 13:34:24.14 +58:22:51.3 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52377_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52377_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.20 | 14:15:48.93 +56:40:25.2 | 1887 6088 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:15:48.86 +56:40:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52378_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52378_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 11.80 | 13:30:16.47 +64:33:20.0 | 5727 1708 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52408_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.44 | 14:38:48.38 +63:42:49.8 | 1196 1536 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52420_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.24 | 13:46:32.37 +67:07:14.3 | 4798 0111 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52422_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52422_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.68 | 14:17:02.68 +59:37:50.8 | 2139 4305 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:02.77 +59:37:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52460_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52460_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.47 | 12:41:58.07 +65:09:53.7 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52478_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52478_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.95 | 14:55:46.22 +65:33:04.5 | 0477 0121 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52513_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52513_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.60 | 12:40:12.85 +63:18:18.8 | 9112 2176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52517_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.84 | 13:43:11.16 +62:44:11.2 | 4821 2769 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52566_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.02 | 13:36:49.61 +59:43:14.8 | 5184 4606 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 13:36:49.61 +59:43:15.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52606_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52606_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 12.87 | 12:58:32.28 +60:53:49.2 | 8022 3807 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52613_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52613_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.50 | 14:27:41.48 +59:05:20.7 | 1261 4453 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:27:41.40 +59:05:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52625_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52625_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.57 | 14:13:31.49 +58:29:47.4 | 2278 5030 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:13:31.48 +58:29:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52633_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 01.18464 | 2461284.68464 | 13.76 | 14:34:12.90 +56:31:10.0 | 0352 5845 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.76 | 14:34:12.91 +56:31:08.8 | 0352 5849 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52645_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.56 | 14:17:06.08 +63:47:55.7 | 2627 1834 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:17:06.23 +63:47:56.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52648_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52648_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 01.18464 | 2461284.68464 | 12.98 | 12:43:40.67 +57:34:41.8 | 9453 5657 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.00 | 12:43:40.50 +57:34:43.9 | 9453 5659 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52664_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.59 | 14:38:28.45 +62:03:35.0 | 0941 2507 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52680_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52680_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.99 | 14:02:06.34 +65:12:56.7 | 3730 1155 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52683_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52683_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.87 | 14:10:53.30 +56:35:13.3 | 2283 6211 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52693_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52693_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.86 | 13:44:22.71 +56:57:08.4 | 4494 6247 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52696_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52696_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.95 | 14:38:51.23 +58:40:28.9 | 0341 4478 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52720_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.00 | 14:24:29.41 +60:16:21.5 | 1667 3809 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 14:24:29.36 +60:16:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52732_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.94 | 14:41:39.93 +58:56:09.1 | 0171 4264 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52743_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.05 | 14:35:26.50 +56:50:08.0 | 0303 5635 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52745_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52745_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.21 | 14:22:24.70 +61:47:56.5 | 2019 2941 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52756_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52756_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.20 | 14:30:34.90 +57:19:37.4 | 0774 5442 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52757_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 09 01.18464 | 2461284.68464 | 13.89 | 14:17:03.90 +63:48:03.5 | 2629 1830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-25-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0138.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.87 | 14:17:03.90 +63:48:02.6 | 2629 1834 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52758_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52758_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.98 | 14:47:09.98 +65:43:27.4 | 1029 0203 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52759_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 13.83 | 14:45:34.53 +64:24:41.9 | 0884 0997 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52772_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52772_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.01 | 14:33:12.18 +64:45:26.6 | 1723 1026 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52788_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.53 | 14:41:21.68 +59:48:53.2 | 0349 3757 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52800_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.52 | 14:48:39.41 +62:17:20.9 | 0284 2160 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52804_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52804_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.34 | 14:37:13.27 +62:31:47.8 | 1105 2257 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52805_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52805_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.48 | 14:38:20.08 +60:45:19.0 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 52807_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 14.32 | 13:54:24.81 +58:55:43.7 | 3801 4983 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139
The candidate 03084_fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 09 01.18514 | 2461284.68514 | 9.44 | 12:37:46.08 +65:33:20.6 | 9024 0798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_232712_TTUQ1b1x1_774664_Fyhm0x8U/fd_UMa-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_23-26-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0139.fits |
**** FOUND 12:37:46.07 +65:33:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461284.68464324 -observatory V36
10:58:31.34 +08:14:48.4 Mercury (-1.4mag)
13:19:43.08 -12:05:15.2 Venus (-4.6mag)
06:57:18.72 +23:19:15.9 Mars (1.2mag)
09:03:56.88 +17:18:51.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:53:03.60 +02:48:11.6 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:32.67 +21:01:37.2 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:18.51 +00:00:35.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:02.34 -23:38:05.9 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:39:06.87 +14:18:45.7 Moon (-11.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 31 23:55 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461284.68464324:
09:03:57.75 +17:18:48.9 Io (6.2mag)
09:03:50.83 +17:19:21.5 Europa (6.3mag)
09:03:52.07 +17:19:13.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
09:04:07.72 +17:17:58.8 Callisto (6.9mag)
09:01:33.00 +17:32:25.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:04:01.11 +17:18:32.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
09:01:12.70 +17:26:53.1 Elara (17.7mag)
09:07:57.81 +16:48:24.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:05:28.32 +17:34:59.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:53:13.78 +02:47:42.3 Titan (8.3mag)
00:53:04.37 +02:48:14.8 Rhea (9.6mag)
00:53:32.42 +02:50:53.2 Iapetus (11.0mag)
00:52:54.99 +02:47:38.1 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:51:56.98 +02:38:31.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 31 23:55 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461284.68464324:
21:18:25.29 -05:14:27.2 JWST
15:53:41.77 +50:54:18.0 Chandra
09:39:14.65 -54:11:55.6 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 31 23:55 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461284.68464324 -observatory V36
03:36:21.87 +19:01:57.4 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:01:08.80 -34:19:14.5 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:14:41.94 -69:58:25.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:14:52.78 +33:32:41.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:41:26.53 +44:28:54.1 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
04:41:26.53 +44:28:54.1 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:18:27.72 +29:22:52.4 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:05:21.23 +26:05:42.0 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:43:50.63 +27:27:17.1 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:44:44.73 +05:15:50.6 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
20:43:47.21 +62:18:03.1 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:31:34.09 -15:06:38.0 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:32:51.04 +32:31:58.9 15.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:59.28 +15:23:41.3 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:37:57.66 +43:22:07.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:34:47.83 +49:33:33.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:32:08.07 -12:57:22.1 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:09:16.71 +19:44:44.9 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:08:17.20 +19:14:16.9 16.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:14:43.64 +00:36:09.2 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:26:59.68 +74:58:36.0 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:08:14.30 +46:16:43.5 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:07:39.52 +10:46:39.3 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:20:55.93 -34:22:48.3 13.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:44:06.56 -05:00:59.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:56:15.23 -03:08:52.8 17.5mag 63P/Wild
00:47:47.21 -06:40:55.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:27:13.56 +19:41:06.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels
03:16:14.86 +14:52:54.2 16.7mag 88P/Howell
05:18:15.58 +26:16:09.4 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:13:20.46 +26:17:29.9 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:14:08.47 +22:08:30.5 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:33:18.34 -19:10:48.4 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos
06:09:47.49 +20:48:47.1 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
23:55:25.25 +02:41:19.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
02:51:24.58 -18:08:39.7 15.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
09:55:08.66 +18:25:02.1 11.9mag 169P/NEAT
03:18:31.86 +08:55:09.5 14.4mag 220P/McNaught
04:31:14.72 +34:19:45.5 15.2mag 260P/McNaught
08:15:10.90 +36:18:20.8 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:21:27.84 +00:26:26.3 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski
09:22:27.26 +17:09:50.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.1K Aug 31 23:55 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 31 23:55 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 31 23:55 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:22:31.145 +09:33:33.30 AT 2026xzi 2026-08-05.29 20.61
17:12:21.291 +21:02:54.44 AT 2026xzh 2026-08-05.34 20.95
16:19:36.299 +11:57:03.80 AT 2026xzg 2026-08-05.29 20.16
16:33:56.913 +13:58:08.26 AT 2026xzf 2026-08-05.29 21.06
17:03:57.056 +04:27:02.47 AT 2026xze 2026-08-05.28 20.78
17:51:27.713 +19:57:36.91 AT 2026xzd 2026-08-05.34 20.73
16:58:34.750 +12:37:35.05 AT 2026xzc 2026-08-05.29 21.81
16:57:45.366 -04:44:07.55 AT 2026xzb 2026-08-06.80 18.89
01:01:40.818 +17:24:52.10 AT 2026xza 2026-08-07.04 19.13
02:48:31.834 +11:32:30.95 AT 2026xyz 2026-07-27.60 20.39
02:42:23.530 +11:34:23.14 AT 2026xyy 2026-07-27.60 20.66
00:37:50.285 +37:00:52.41 AT 2026xyx 2026-07-26.50 21.17
00:06:37.754 +38:47:58.50 AT 2026xyw 2026-07-25.56 20.91
23:33:38.449 -02:26:41.50 AT 2026xyv 2026-07-25.58 21.12
22:17:47.290 -01:22:05.26 AT 2026xyu 2026-07-24.49 21.05
22:16:54.038 -04:38:43.31 AT 2026xyt 2026-07-24.49 20.75
22:36:27.535 -04:34:29.60 AT 2026xys 2026-07-24.50 20.57
18:16:57.398 +41:46:52.10 AT 2026xyr 2026-07-20.45 20.64
22:13:09.171 +40:56:17.81 AT 2026xyq 2026-07-20.50 20.52
22:12:39.602 -31:11:47.46 AT 2026xyp 2026-07-20.53 20.52
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 31 23:55 tns_transients_list.txt