This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.0847 2461284.5847 9.86 18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5
9.47433 -9.03595 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.8 Flora 0 -0 0 10.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5: 14.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.5847,9.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.0847 9.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.0847 2461284.5847 12.07 18:39:51.84 -28:41:19.1
5.87880 -10.33970 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.128 Nemesis -1 -1 2 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:39:51.84 -28:41:19.1: 13.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:39:51.84 -28:41:19.1: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.5847,12.07,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.0847 12.07CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 09 01.0847 2461284.5847 13.23 19:07:26.16 -23:22:02.4
13.45898 -13.75897 galactic Sgr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.182 Elsa 1 0 1 13.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:07:26.16 -23:22:02.4: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:26.16 -23:22:02.4: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461284.5847,13.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260901.0847 13.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461284.58509731 01.09.2026 02:02:22.408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 6651
Objects passed selection criteria: 6651
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7068.75
Average stars matched: 5893.75 (83.3775 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234000 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 21:04:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
First image: 2461147.90695453 17.04.2026 09:45:50.871 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Last image: 2461284.58509731 01.09.2026 02:02:22.408 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 100
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 82626
Objects passed selection criteria: 82488
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 76961.5
Average stars matched: 67070.5 (87.1481 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 545984 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 31 21:05:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461284.58429071
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:15.347 -25:58:46.95 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:15.347 -25:58:46.95
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0941 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.7'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.89"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:18.390 -25:59:17.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:18.390 -25:59:17.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1034 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:15.347 -25:58:46.95
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:18.390 -25:59:17.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01421 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dOMYP843aC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PxZTfd6RQb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V3VqzRHOFa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZLMB03J7ky
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.136550
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.136550
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.36
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.78
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.5158 to 296.7476 deg, Dec -31.5070 to -20.1279 deg
Loaded 14496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5080 out of 5188 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5188 out of 6297 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9550 to 297.0903 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5647 deg
Loaded 13345 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7818 out of 8091 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8091 out of 10687 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.3 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
3.2 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.8 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.1 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dOMYP843aC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=388, bad_region=0, passed=6297
Got 6297 stars (including 5895 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6297 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6297 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.332 n_q1=1422 n_q2=818 n_q3=1496 n_q4=1094 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PxZTfd6RQb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=726, bad_region=0, passed=10687
Got 10687 stars (including 9950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10687 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10687 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.637 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.636 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=1364 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1255 n_q4=1215 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V3VqzRHOFa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=381, bad_region=0, passed=5499
Got 5499 stars (including 5113 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5499 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=9.927 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.651 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4835 robust_rms=0.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4835 robust_rms_before=0.972 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.517 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.445 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.752 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.585
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:15.343 -25:58:47.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5499 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1270219.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.972 -> 0.445 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1299 n_q2=934 n_q3=1418 n_q4=1184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ZLMB03J7ky (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=4, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, bad_region=0, passed=5991
Got 5991 stars (including 5591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5991 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013065 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010452 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4831 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4831 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=9.711 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.053 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4831 robust_rms=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4831 robust_rms_before=0.948 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.456 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.715 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.553
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:18.391 -25:59:18.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 5995 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1270210.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.948 -> 0.456 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4831 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.495 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.509 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1296 n_q2=938 n_q3=1419 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.161
ref2=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.058
new1=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits sigma_overall=0.473 worst_q_ratio=1.272
new2=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits sigma_overall=0.495 worst_q_ratio=1.167
reference average sigma_overall=0.5065 worst_q_ratio=1.1095
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004_astrometric_residuals.png (4835 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005_astrometric_residuals.png (4831 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5: 14.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:39:47.22 -31:15:24.5: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:39:47.22 -31:15:24.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:47.22 -31:15:24.5: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5: 14.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24664.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24664_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 24664_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24668_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 24668_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.25 -22:42:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24670_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 24670_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.72 -28:06:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24672_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 24672_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
18:41:27.35 -24:55:44.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Image size: 942.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:15.343 -25:58:47.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:15.343 -25:58:47.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0940 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 19:12:18.391 -25:59:18.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 19:11:51.170 -26:00:19.21
Second-epoch image center 19:12:18.391 -25:59:18.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1033 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 19:12:15.343 -25:58:47.92
Second-epoch second image center 19:12:18.391 -25:59:18.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01422 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FpRkaDGWUJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qnZU5uD4yg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4G6VjTVLbG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bAjqpi1eCa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits and wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.872800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.872800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.85
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 84103 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.4864 to 296.7493 deg, Dec -31.5437 to -20.0386 deg
Loaded 14698 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10647 out of 11707 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11707 out of 84103 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 118893 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 278.9116 to 297.0918 deg, Dec -31.2648 to -20.5524 deg
Loaded 13402 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10008 out of 11606 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11606 out of 118893 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
2.1 pix Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
2.9 pix fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
13.9 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
14.3 mag. Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FpRkaDGWUJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4218, bad_region=1, passed=84096
Got 84096 stars (including 79714 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84096 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4830 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.0)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 84096 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4828 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4828 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1423 n_q2=879 n_q3=1397 n_q4=1129 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.165
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.qnZU5uD4yg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits' -> 'wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=8799, bad_region=0, passed=118877
Got 118877 stars (including 109929 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 118877 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4838 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4838 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 293 to 349 (Dec -31.3 to -20.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4836 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4836 stars left (next iteration limit 5321)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits N_match=4836 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.666 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.619 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.599 n_q1=1388 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1175 n_q4=1251 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits -region wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.4G6VjTVLbG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=2341, bad_region=0, passed=51823
Got 51823 stars (including 49410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51823 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.4 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4841 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4841 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=9.665 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.526 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.640 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4841 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.577 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4841 robust_rms_before=0.440 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.490 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.577 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.577
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.577 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits N_match=4841 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1203 n_q2=908 n_q3=1483 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.346
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.bAjqpi1eCa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=2537, bad_region=0, passed=55387
Got 55387 stars (including 52761 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55387 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 292 to 351 (Dec -31.5 to -20.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4842 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55387 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4842 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=9.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.573 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4842 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.538 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4842 robust_rms_before=0.459 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.477 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.541 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.538
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.541 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits N_match=4842 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.643 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1218 n_q2=914 n_q3=1463 n_q4=1247 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.375
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits -region wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-01-12_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0004.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_210257_TTUQ1b1x1_1256348_lWhmvttA/wcs_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sgr-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:02:25.14 -30:22:26.1: 12.37 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:06:24.85 -23:14:52.0: 12.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:30:01.83 -21:21:24.0: 12.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:39:55.75 -30:55:28.8: 12.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:46:13.65 -22:07:26.6: 12.77 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:44:40.54 -20:26:54.2: 12.65 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:44:40.54 -20:26:54.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:44:40.54 -20:26:54.2: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.1: 12.11 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:03.59 -20:35:04.1: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:46:13.65 -22:07:26.6: 13.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:06:24.85 -23:14:52.0: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:02:25.14 -30:22:26.1: 12.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:30:01.83 -21:21:24.0: 13.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:39:55.75 -30:55:28.8: 12.76 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:13.65 -22:07:26.6: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=12.8636 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:02:25.14 -30:22:26.1: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.1541 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:06:24.85 -23:14:52.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.4986 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:30:01.83 -21:21:24.0: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2598 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:39:55.75 -30:55:28.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=12.8072 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:39:51.84 -28:41:19.1: 13.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:17:12.73 -21:03:27.5: 12.38 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:26:05.65 -21:31:57.0: 12.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:39:51.84 -28:41:19.1: 14.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:17:12.73 -21:03:27.5: 12.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:17:12.73 -21:03:27.5: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4373 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:26:05.65 -21:31:57.0: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:26:05.65 -21:31:57.0: ref_mag=12.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6259 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:46:04.56 -20:22:23.9: 12.70 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:50:16.10 -20:37:42.4: 13.40 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:46:04.56 -20:22:23.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:04.56 -20:22:23.9: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:50:16.10 -20:37:42.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:50:16.10 -20:37:42.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:54:47.56 -28:49:02.7: 13.39 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:00:20.03 -24:24:03.1: 12.75 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:54:47.56 -28:49:02.7: 13.70 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:54:47.56 -28:49:02.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=12.6660 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:46:13.48 -22:27:08.4: 13.44 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:00:20.03 -24:24:03.1: 12.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:46:13.48 -22:27:08.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:46:13.48 -22:27:08.4: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:20.03 -24:24:03.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.8679 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:42:16.19 -20:16:17.3: 13.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:42:16.19 -20:16:17.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:16.19 -20:16:17.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:15:46.34 -20:57:32.5: 13.29 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 18:47:13.77 -20:36:34.6: 13.43 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:07:26.16 -23:22:02.4: 14.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 18:47:13.77 -20:36:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:13.77 -20:36:34.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:15:46.34 -20:57:32.5: 13.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:15:46.34 -20:57:32.5: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.0430 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:07:26.16 -23:22:02.4: 15.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-17_04-45-50_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits at 19:01:35.92 -27:18:07.1: 13.89 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-08_01-16-29_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0055.fits at 19:01:35.92 -27:18:07.1: 13.80 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 19:01:35.92 -27:18:07.1: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=12.3301 delta=1.50 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out112071.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133337.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133422.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133136_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133136_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133149_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:29.28 -25:41:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133155_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133155_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:22:43.67 -22:52:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133156_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133159_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133161_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133172_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:23.26 -26:32:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133174_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.56 -30:09:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133177_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133180_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133180_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133182_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:51.16 -30:03:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133184_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:16.86 -23:01:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133188_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:43:06.26 -23:57:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133192_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133192_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:07:40.96 -28:19:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:27.34 -24:55:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133204_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:06.19 -22:42:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133213_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:18.10 -23:17:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133216_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133216_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:21:22.73 -29:30:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133223_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:43.45 -29:00:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133224_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133224_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:04:46.89 -22:16:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133233_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133233_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:48:48.88 -22:09:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133239_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133239_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:24.29 -21:28:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133240_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133240_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:57.59 -27:38:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133241_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:59.15 -22:22:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133242_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:24.70 -24:41:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133246_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:46:27.84 -22:23:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133251_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133251_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:21.09 -30:09:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133254_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:08.70 -29:11:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133257_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.00 -25:13:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133263_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133263_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:42.35 -20:32:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133274_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 133274_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133275_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133280_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:57.70 -26:01:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133291_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133291_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:23:21.06 -23:53:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133292_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:01.34 -30:01:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133293_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133293_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:09:09.30 -23:24:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133294_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133294_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:10:17.19 -21:11:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133299_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133299_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:59.93 -21:49:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133301_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133302_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133302_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:35.66 -22:18:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133304_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:13.79 -22:40:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133307_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133307_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:53:40.85 -27:41:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133308_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133308_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:01.36 -22:39:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133312_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:48.83 -26:20:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133315_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:08:29.96 -20:59:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133316_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133316_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:51:17.79 -25:10:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133321_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133321_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:02:06.44 -26:53:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133324_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133324_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133325_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133331_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133331_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:10.35 -21:06:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133332_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133332_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:24.58 -23:30:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133333_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:40.74 -24:55:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133335_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:25:29.79 -24:20:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133337_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133337_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:47.56 -28:49:02.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.350 6761910680196694784 283.69846414626 -28.81714714284 12.4942 11.1070 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.350#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133351_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133351_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:14.81 -28:33:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133356_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133356_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:55:08.72 -22:46:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133359_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133359_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:01.62 -21:00:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133370_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133370_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:45:18.32 -24:55:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133374_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:52.06 -22:16:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133378_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:58:36.57 -20:39:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133382_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:28.38 -24:15:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133384_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133384_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133385_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133392_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133392_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:03:36.36 -27:11:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133397_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133397_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133399_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133401_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
Preparing report for the candidate 133422_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133424_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 133424_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:01.95 -27:11:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 102277_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:13:49.85 -22:29:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 109929_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:37.86 -27:10:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21550_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 21550_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:54.16 -27:18:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 75796_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:15:58.74 -23:12:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 114965_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:39:37.38 -25:02:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 112071_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:01:35.92 -27:18:07.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.737 6763608845857394432 285.40028941794 -27.30249355149 12.5095 10.7930 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.737#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 111198_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:44:27.38 -24:05:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 36152_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:10.76 -25:29:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 26719_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:26.53 -27:02:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 104255_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:26:07.96 -23:28:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 34328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:41:32.99 -26:40:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 98946_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:42:01.36 -23:10:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 97737_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:47:33.59 -24:07:20.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 23744_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:38:10.63 -26:58:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 97175_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:42:57.74 -28:06:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 96991_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:55.26 -25:35:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 96372_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:20.92 -26:02:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 96328_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 19:45:38.21 -30:33:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005
The candidate 95610_fd_Sgr-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_21-02-22_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0005 did not pass the final checks