NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMi-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.98    12:57:04.70 +80:04:20.4   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.98    12:57:01.56 +80:04:21.0   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 31.2932  2461283.7932  13.98  12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7
122.62875  37.05253 galactic  Cam  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7:  15.62 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7:  15.54 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   UMi-01-Q1b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 1

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits
Field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMi-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMi-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMi-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 223182 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 223182 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits

renamed 'UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.png' -> 'transient_report/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits_preview.png'
UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 499.2566 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 584.8745 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2397.9468 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 687.0868 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2398.6940 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 686.8866 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.80303 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-31T02:01:38.4911763' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-31T07:01:38.4911763' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61283.2928066086 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-31T07:01:48.3958998' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61283.2929212386 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.997537509376 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998060890525 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.0488888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 345.832222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99134160858382 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29552 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29552 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 40.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits :) Spent 0.518116 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-31T02:02:23.3504635' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-31T07:02:23.3504635' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61283.2933258102 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-31T07:02:33.2529830' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61283.2934404165 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 239.997537749721 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 77.4998060925237 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 30.0094444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 345.849722222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.99369621312309 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMi-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '16 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29552 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29552 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 28.2999992370605 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 12.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 40.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.41 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 26.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 23.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 13.00104 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 8.600688 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits :) Spent 0.499944 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/d_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits


fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461283.79292235 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0409 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00190 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0NqTbntbCa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qX58IigO1t Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tfIkdYzYOR Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oV1iiRPvkp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.810800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.810800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 10691 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5714 to 286.0278 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12699 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6329 out of 6676 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6676 out of 10691 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=6.3) Read 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec +70.5002 to +82.8178 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.5610 to 286.6212 deg, Dec 70.5002 to 82.8178 deg Loaded 12465 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6292 out of 6524 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6524 out of 10169 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=6.4) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.3 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.1 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.2 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 14.4 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.0NqTbntbCa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=761, bad_region=0, passed=10690 Got 10690 stars (including 9914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.283 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1085 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1393 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.169 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.qX58IigO1t (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=585, bad_region=0, passed=10169 Got 10169 stars (including 9572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10169 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10169 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.390 n_q1=1430 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1213 n_q4=1088 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.tfIkdYzYOR (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=361, bad_region=0, passed=5574 Got 5574 stars (including 5199 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5574 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4908 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4908 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4914 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5574 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5398) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=10.063 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.777 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4907 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.352 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4907 robust_rms_before=0.819 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.302 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.352 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1418 n_q2=1142 n_q3=1330 n_q4=1017 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.021 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.oV1iiRPvkp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5612 Got 5612 stars (including 5244 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5612 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5612 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=9.872 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.745 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.524 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.356 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.836 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.303 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.342 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.332 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.356 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.332 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.282 n_q1=1426 n_q2=1133 n_q3=1330 n_q4=1017 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.169 ref2=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.134 new1=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.021 new2=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits sigma_overall=0.307 worst_q_ratio=1.078 reference average sigma_overall=0.35 worst_q_ratio=1.1515 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0425 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 16:00:02.579 +77:29:59.05 Second-epoch image center 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0409 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 16:00:44.409 +77:31:09.45 Second-epoch second image center 16:00:42.312 +77:31:10.05 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00190 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ipAg8tMTjp Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bNKUPD7ewK Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nsOxxbg1f3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q7t9t8bLuG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.685800 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.685800 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.22 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 63033 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec +70.2810 to +82.8119 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.0727 to 286.1546 deg, Dec 70.2810 to 82.8119 deg Loaded 12774 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5842 out of 6790 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6790 out of 63033 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (aperture=4.8) Read 56082 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec +70.4438 to +82.8301 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2817 to 286.6211 deg, Dec 70.4438 to 82.8301 deg Loaded 12608 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 6691 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6691 out of 56082 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (aperture=5.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 2.2 pix UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 2.0 pix fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 14.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.ipAg8tMTjp (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3819, bad_region=47, passed=63015 Got 63015 stars (including 59032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63015 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63015 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.316 n_q1=1127 n_q2=1256 n_q3=1180 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.162 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.bNKUPD7ewK (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=29, blended=3064, bad_region=0, passed=56053 Got 56053 stars (including 52907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56053 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56053 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1399 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1125 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119 The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.nsOxxbg1f3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1250, bad_region=3, passed=36698 Got 36698 stars (including 35365 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36698 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36698 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36698 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36698 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=9.636 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.294 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.345 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.803 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.308 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.345 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.308 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1449 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1299 n_q4=1023 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.022 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.Q7t9t8bLuG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1238, bad_region=2, passed=36651 Got 36651 stars (including 35331 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36651 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.3 to 82.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36651 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=9.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.587 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.347 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.819 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.300 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.337 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.318 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.347 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.318 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.284 n_q1=1443 n_q2=1138 n_q3=1309 n_q4=1016 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.072 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:49:25.18 +77:00:18.6: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:53:30.05 +75:33:08.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:59:56.06 +78:51:38.9: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:54:30.04 +75:23:54.5: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 16:37:48.82 +81:55:14.1: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 15:29:15.15 +78:38:55.4: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:37:48.82 +81:55:14.1: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:49:25.18 +77:00:18.6: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:53:30.05 +75:33:08.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 16:59:56.06 +78:51:38.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:54:30.04 +75:23:54.5: 13.97 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:48.82 +81:55:14.1: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9867 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:53:30.05 +75:33:08.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6237 delta=-0.45 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:49:25.18 +77:00:18.6: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4320 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:59:56.06 +78:51:38.9: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9269 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:30.04 +75:23:54.5: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1123 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 15:29:15.15 +78:38:55.4: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.40 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:15.15 +78:38:55.4: ref_mag=11.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0056 delta=-0.61 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 13:50:59.32 +80:47:17.4: 13.15 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:16:27.67 +71:36:42.3: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 17:10:32.88 +75:06:29.2: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 13:50:59.32 +80:47:17.4: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-04-16_04-06-17_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0293.fits at 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:50:59.32 +80:47:17.4: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3741 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:16:27.67 +71:36:42.3: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:16:27.67 +71:36:42.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4425 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 17:10:32.88 +75:06:29.2: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:10:32.88 +75:06:29.2: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7032 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-06-17_02-08-44_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0274.fits at 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out75977.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75758_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75758_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    14.15    17:54:29.92 +75:23:54.1   0606 3133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    14.08    17:54:30.16 +75:23:54.9   0604 3132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75762_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75762_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.98    16:37:48.65 +81:55:12.0   4214 0425   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.99    16:37:48.99 +81:55:16.3   4214 0424   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75763_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75763_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    14.25    16:45:49.79 +81:38:18.6   4004 0547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 16:45:49.55 +81:38:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75765_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75765_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.86    16:59:56.09 +78:51:37.6   3168 2044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    14.03    16:59:56.03 +78:51:40.2   3167 2044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75769_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75769_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.71    17:53:30.09 +75:33:08.2   0688 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.56    17:53:30.00 +75:33:08.5   0687 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75775_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75775_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    12.40    17:49:25.14 +77:00:18.5   1277 2398   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.48    17:49:25.22 +77:00:18.7   1275 2397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75776_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75776_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    10.88    17:53:21.71 +78:54:40.9   1772 1347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 17:53:21.70 +78:54:40.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75781_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75781_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    10.63    18:03:05.07 +74:48:56.8   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75784_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75784_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    10.82    16:26:38.38 +75:28:19.2   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75789_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75789_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    11.05    15:43:17.14 +80:33:52.7   5358 1382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75796_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75796_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    11.44    16:23:58.87 +79:38:49.4   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75804_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75804_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    11.56    13:50:33.22 +78:40:41.2   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75815_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75815_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.05    17:52:06.36 +79:36:50.4   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75817_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75817_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    11.88    15:43:29.63 +73:51:44.7   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75822_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75822_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    12.02    15:29:15.17 +78:38:55.5   5772 2525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    11.99    15:29:15.12 +78:38:55.3   5771 2525   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75827_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75827_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.18    15:29:08.04 +80:00:22.8   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75829_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75829_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.15    13:13:03.19 +80:28:26.9   8886 0250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 13:13:03.28 +80:28:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75835_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75835_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.36    16:26:11.00 +80:35:34.3   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75843_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75843_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.44    15:59:09.34 +80:20:23.6   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75844_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75844_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.58    16:12:17.29 +82:36:11.2   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75849_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75849_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.59    15:44:28.49 +80:57:35.8   5330 1143   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 15:44:28.41 +80:57:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75850_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75850_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.68    16:56:12.59 +74:15:34.9   2415 4721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 16:56:12.49 +74:15:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75855_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75855_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.71    14:50:25.49 +74:12:39.7   7508 4977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 14:50:25.43 +74:12:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75857_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75857_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.69    15:22:17.18 +78:06:53.3   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75868_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75868_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.96    15:35:16.32 +82:25:52.9   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75871_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75871_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.79    13:33:05.84 +79:25:17.1   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75875_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75875_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.24    17:01:59.26 +82:10:36.5   3773 0131   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 17:01:59.14 +82:10:36.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75881_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75881_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    12.85    13:42:36.90 +77:36:47.6   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75883_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75883_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.07    14:58:45.10 +76:30:28.7   6910 3681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 14:58:45.05 +76:30:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75887_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75887_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.36    18:54:12.01 +79:07:18.2   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75893_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75893_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.43    17:39:42.14 +72:54:26.7   0368 4751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 17:39:42.09 +72:54:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75900_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75900_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.45    17:03:24.19 +74:56:44.4   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75909_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75909_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.35    13:50:59.41 +80:47:17.2   7981 0596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.41    13:50:59.23 +80:47:17.7   7980 0597   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75918_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75918_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.52    17:16:27.66 +71:36:41.6   1002 5926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.39    17:16:27.69 +71:36:43.0   1001 5925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75924_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75924_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.37    14:01:06.90 +76:44:53.4   8792 2928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 14:01:06.73 +76:44:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75929_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75929_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.72    16:49:59.61 +80:32:53.0   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75942_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75942_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.72    16:49:08.06 +71:51:16.5   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75945_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75945_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.71    16:09:54.28 +82:03:48.8   4806 0442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 16:09:54.66 +82:03:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75949_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75949_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 31.29292    2461283.79292    13.84    17:10:32.74 +75:06:29.0   2049 4047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.62    17:10:33.01 +75:06:29.4   2047 4047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75950_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75950_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.77    17:33:48.70 +80:32:45.4   2720 0749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 17:33:48.60 +80:32:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75952_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75952_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.84    17:23:22.62 +73:37:31.9   1210 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 17:23:22.70 +73:37:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75953_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75953_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.59    14:17:27.10 +79:51:17.7   7592 1393   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 14:17:27.37 +79:51:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75970_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75970_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    13.93    15:50:24.77 +82:10:08.7   5214 0408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 15:50:24.86 +82:10:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75973_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 75973_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    14.10    16:30:11.57 +77:27:50.9   3834 3095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits **** FOUND 16:30:11.75 +77:27:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 75977_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 Preparing report for the candidate 75977_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 45094_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 The candidate 45094_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 31.29344    2461283.79344    14.03    17:55:53.91 +76:33:46.9   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 17s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-31_CI_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_020308_TTUQ1b1x1_121036_mHO15oB4/monitoring_positions.txt Read 36704 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2586 to 286.6081 deg, Dec +70.3368 to +82.8408 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2586 to 286.6081 deg, Dec 70.3368 to 82.8408 deg Loaded 12767 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6397 out of 6804 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6804 out of 36704 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461283.79292 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 240.18917 deg Dec= +77.52006 deg Frame center: alt= +30.177 deg az= 343.180 deg airmass= 1.9813 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 30.049 deg (difference +0.128 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 1.9913 (we compute 1.9813) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.2040 +/- 0.0095 mag/airmass N= 4612 airmass span 1.5739-2.7859 scatter 0.1710 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-01-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0284.fits: OK +0.410078 -0.203965 1.9813 +0.2040 4612 1.2120 0.1710 1.5739 2.7859 Read 36661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 192.2586 to 286.6094 deg, Dec +70.3368 to +82.8413 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 192.2586 to 286.6094 deg, Dec 70.3368 to 82.8413 deg Loaded 12767 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6395 out of 6802 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 6802 out of 36661 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits via Tycho-2 util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461283.79344 (FITS header) Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords) Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 240.18043 deg Dec= +77.52022 deg Frame center: alt= +30.137 deg az= 343.200 deg airmass= 1.9836 Header cross-check: CENTALT= 30.009 deg (difference +0.127 deg) Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 1.9937 (we compute 1.9836) Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.2012 +/- 0.0094 mag/airmass N= 4533 airmass span 1.5750-2.7912 scatter 0.1688 mag Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-31_02-02-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0285.fits: OK +0.408465 -0.201199 1.9836 +0.2012 4533 1.2162 0.1688 1.5750 2.7912 ########### Completed UMi-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 ################################################################################### 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 12:57:03.13 +80:04:20.7 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461283.79292235 -observatory V36 10:52:18.58 +08:56:10.7 Mercury (-1.5mag) 13:17:11.65 -11:42:52.2 Venus (-4.6mag) 06:54:51.30 +23:21:44.7 Mars (1.2mag) 09:03:11.64 +17:21:58.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:53:14.35 +02:49:30.8 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:30.77 +21:01:32.3 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:14:23.25 +00:01:07.6 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:26:06.45 -23:37:51.5 Pluto (14.5mag) 00:52:46.19 +09:11:09.2 Moon (-11.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 31 02:06 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461283.79292235: 09:03:13.50 +17:21:49.4 Io (6.2mag) 09:03:05.97 +17:22:26.6 Europa (6.3mag) 09:03:18.85 +17:21:22.2 Ganymede (5.6mag) 09:03:30.51 +17:20:27.8 Callisto (6.9mag) 09:00:46.63 +17:35:03.5 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:03:10.36 +17:22:04.5 Thebe (16.6mag) 09:00:26.50 +17:29:37.6 Elara (17.7mag) 09:07:13.43 +16:51:50.1 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:04:46.91 +17:37:51.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:53:21.43 +02:48:56.0 Titan (8.4mag) 00:53:18.96 +02:49:19.2 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:53:44.63 +02:52:10.8 Iapetus (11.0mag) 00:53:02.63 +02:49:04.7 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:52:08.72 +02:39:56.7 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 31 02:06 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461283.79292235: 21:11:19.05 -06:07:18.3 JWST 20:08:42.42 -25:04:07.6 Chandra 05:41:08.24 +36:55:40.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 31 02:06 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461283.79292235 -observatory V36 03:35:42.38 +18:59:02.7 17.4mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:57.02 -34:20:08.7 14.3mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:13:58.89 -69:55:39.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:44.62 +33:31:22.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:39:48.62 +44:19:19.2 15.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:19:12.05 +29:28:46.0 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:04:37.28 +26:06:43.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:43:01.04 +27:29:21.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:44:10.06 +05:16:05.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 20:44:33.91 +62:28:26.0 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:31:55.61 -15:01:53.3 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:32:00.97 +32:28:59.3 15.7mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:55.59 +15:24:18.9 17.9mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:38:40.35 +43:23:24.0 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:36:05.42 +49:35:09.5 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:31:35.72 -12:56:52.9 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:08:53.97 +19:55:05.8 17.8mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:06:53.80 +19:18:18.3 16.9mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:14:02.07 +00:40:20.6 16.8mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:25:08.86 +75:06:16.6 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:08:30.39 +46:17:35.0 17.4mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:06:50.95 +10:42:09.7 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:20:10.21 -34:14:38.6 13.2mag 10P/Tempel 11:43:31.33 -04:57:06.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:54:27.44 -02:51:43.5 17.5mag 63P/Wild 00:48:11.79 -06:37:36.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:25:25.25 +19:44:35.7 17.1mag 78P/Gehrels 03:15:59.42 +14:51:31.0 16.7mag 88P/Howell 08:50:41.87 +24:08:28.4 16.6mag 93P/Lovas 05:15:24.32 +25:55:19.0 17.6mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:10:36.22 +26:29:34.6 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:12:07.29 +22:19:26.6 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:31:23.54 -18:51:38.7 17.4mag 124P/Mrkos 06:08:38.87 +20:50:10.2 15.9mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 07:05:48.99 +17:29:01.1 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 23:55:50.75 +02:43:55.2 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 02:53:36.72 -18:12:03.8 15.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:31:44.22 +37:56:13.1 16.3mag 162P/Siding Spring 09:58:59.19 +19:14:41.8 11.9mag 169P/NEAT 03:17:33.02 +08:58:30.2 14.5mag 220P/McNaught 04:28:44.87 +34:01:39.3 15.2mag 260P/McNaught 08:12:42.29 +36:23:13.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:20:56.68 +00:32:29.4 17.9mag 391P/Kowalski 09:21:40.22 +17:12:35.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Aug 31 02:06 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 31 02:06 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 31 02:06 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 22:27:31.211 +22:15:48.66 AT 2026xxg 2026-06-14.55 20.88 14:21:34.365 +38:26:54.70 AT 2026xxf 2026-06-13.34 20.61 17:16:51.456 +37:04:07.35 AT 2026xxe 2026-06-13.48 20.93 14:10:23.884 +39:20:25.17 AT 2026xxd 2026-06-13.33 21.19 18:44:05.977 +45:41:48.41 AT 2026xxc 2026-05-08.56 20.8 13:07:52.625 +46:39:29.67 AT 2026xxb 2026-06-13.28 20.52 18:58:55.592 +53:25:33.54 AT 2026xxa 2026-06-13.53 21.05 14:12:40.222 +37:27:44.05 AT 2026xwz 2026-06-13.33 20.46 22:21:01.592 +09:02:16.86 AT 2026xwy 2026-06-12.53 21.06 20:39:19.399 +06:12:12.45 AT 2026xwx 2026-06-12.53 21.54 18:14:06.298 +37:31:14.40 AT 2026xww 2026-06-12.48 20.72 12:14:41.061 +27:36:47.29 AT 2026xwv 2026-06-12.27 20.43 17:23:21.283 +19:26:30.60 AT 2026xwu 2026-06-11.33 21.47 17:22:27.046 +15:27:08.47 AT 2026xwt 2026-06-11.33 21.28 18:46:10.631 +36:16:05.14 AT 2026xws 2026-06-06.57 20.31 16:48:36.995 +33:11:49.00 AT 2026xwr 2026-06-06.46 20.45 16:29:06.182 +11:43:15.24 AT 2026xwq 2026-05-25.50 21.15 17:29:19.349 +06:28:33.49 AT 2026xwp 2026-05-26.57 20.38 16:27:21.992 +05:35:48.19 AT 2026xwo 2026-05-24.38 21.07 16:18:40.092 +08:52:46.11 AT 2026xwn 2026-05-24.38 20.68 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 31 02:06 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 82 C