This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 30.3815 2461282.8815 12.67 04:29:50.58 +24:50:29.1
173.25669 -16.03796 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales 0 -1 1 12.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:50.58 +24:50:29.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:50.58 +24:50:29.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 30.3815* 04 29 50.58 +24 50 29.1 12.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461282.8815,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260830.3815 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 30.3815 2461282.8815 13.83 03:29:40.17 +33:54:33.1
156.77420 -18.36564 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 6.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.762 Pulcova 0 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:29:40.17 +33:54:33.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:29:40.17 +33:54:33.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 30.3815* 03 29 40.17 +33 54 33.1 13.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461282.8815,13.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260830.3815 13.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461282.88177660 30.08.2026 09:09:35.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 12653
Objects passed selection criteria: 12616
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9976.5
Average stars matched: 9733 (97.5593 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 238460 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 30 04:15:01 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
First image: 2461049.68555112 09.01.2026 04:27:01.617 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Last image: 2461282.88177660 30.08.2026 09:09:35.498 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 70
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90476
Objects passed selection criteria: 90270
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 69820.2
Average stars matched: 67543.8 (96.7395 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 480868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 30 04:16:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461282.88118986
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:50.204 +29:55:29.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:50.204 +29:55:29.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0815 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:49.612 +29:56:09.27 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:49.612 +29:56:09.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0726 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:50.204 +29:55:29.22
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:49.612 +29:56:09.27
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01133 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uR9X0OQg8d
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g8zMhmkehb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YPH3PkxmqD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d9nP8t2sdl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.967300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.967300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3062 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5833 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3062 deg
Loaded 7255 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5544 out of 6056 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6056 out of 13390 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3107 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5733 to 69.6293 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3107 deg
Loaded 7269 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5557 out of 6071 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6071 out of 13513 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
2.0 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.uR9X0OQg8d (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13390
Got 13390 stars (including 12252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13390 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13390 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1524 n_q2=1103 n_q3=892 n_q4=1376 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g8zMhmkehb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1130, bad_region=0, passed=13513
Got 13513 stars (including 12361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13513 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13513 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.261 n_q1=1523 n_q2=1108 n_q3=895 n_q4=1373 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YPH3PkxmqD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, bad_region=0, passed=6582
Got 6582 stars (including 6163 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6582 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4876 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=8.962 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4876 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.329 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4876 robust_rms_before=0.915 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.309 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.378 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.329
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:50.230 +29:55:28.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6582 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky125896.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.915 -> 0.284 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=4876 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=1367 n_q2=860 n_q3=1157 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.d9nP8t2sdl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=410, bad_region=0, passed=6631
Got 6631 stars (including 6214 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4874 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5361)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=8.988 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.281 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4874 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4874 robust_rms_before=0.901 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.298 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.364 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.316
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:49.634 +29:56:08.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6631 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky125953.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.901 -> 0.266 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.247 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1359 n_q2=861 n_q3=1160 n_q4=1494 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.212
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.233
ref2=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits sigma_overall=0.337 worst_q_ratio=1.288
new1=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new2=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.212
reference average sigma_overall=0.338 worst_q_ratio=1.2605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156_astrometric_residuals.png (4899 matched stars from wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4876 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.22 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.9: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.9: 10.97 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.99 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.33 +25:16:25.9: ref_mag=10.99 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2992 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 20879_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20880_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 20880_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:43.84 +25:42:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 20942_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:11.16 +31:27:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 01673_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.00 +34:15:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 03432_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:44.73 +33:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:50.230 +29:55:28.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:50.230 +29:55:28.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0817 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 03:59:49.634 +29:56:08.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:59:59.673 +29:59:55.48
Second-epoch image center 03:59:49.634 +29:56:08.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0728 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 03:59:50.230 +29:55:28.32
Second-epoch second image center 03:59:49.634 +29:56:08.33
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01132 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Ezw3o40iLF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8KQ2iqHCMV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A6Rryqqz54
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SnOh8TdCh3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits and wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.833900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.833900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.18
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99190 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3527 to +35.3061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5578 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3527 to 35.3061 deg
Loaded 7277 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4826 out of 6103 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6103 out of 99190 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 98825 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec +24.3528 to +35.3112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 50.5581 to 69.6814 deg, Dec 24.3528 to 35.3112 deg
Loaded 7286 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4805 out of 6109 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 6109 out of 98825 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.8 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
1.9 pix Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
2.7 pix fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
15.7 mag. Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Ezw3o40iLF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=32, blended=7855, bad_region=9, passed=99158
Got 99158 stars (including 91129 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99158 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4908 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99158 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.262 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1120 n_q3=933 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.244
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.8KQ2iqHCMV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=25, blended=7957, bad_region=10, passed=98800
Got 98800 stars (including 90683 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98800 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4904 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 571 to 628 (Dec 24.4 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5394)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=1460 n_q2=1117 n_q3=937 n_q4=1390 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits -region wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.A6Rryqqz54 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1766, bad_region=4, passed=41665
Got 41665 stars (including 39846 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41665 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41664 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=9.155 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.558 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.285 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.283 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.330 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.330 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1374 n_q2=837 n_q3=1182 n_q4=1497 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.SnOh8TdCh3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1679, bad_region=4, passed=41346
Got 41346 stars (including 39602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41346 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 570 to 628 (Dec 24.1 to 35.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41346 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=9.174 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.557 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.325 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.344 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.267 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.297 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.266 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.319 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.319
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.319 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1380 n_q2=846 n_q3=1173 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.195
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-08-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0302.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-30_CI_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_041239_TTUQ1b1x1_87977_CV576jsm/wcs_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.7: 12.48 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:05:43.40 +34:26:03.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:40:07.63 +26:36:34.2: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:32:17.88 +33:35:12.4: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:26:44.41 +35:03:24.7: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:27:00.25 +29:11:00.2: 13.15 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: 11.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:34:42.47 +34:03:43.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:32.39 +32:08:42.0: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:27:00.25 +29:11:00.2: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.7: 12.44 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: 11.21 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:32:17.88 +33:35:12.4: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:05:43.40 +34:26:03.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:26:44.41 +35:03:24.7: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:40:07.63 +26:36:34.2: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:34:42.47 +34:03:43.7: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.21 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:27:00.25 +29:11:00.2: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2328 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:42:42.31 +26:53:57.7: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6558 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:43:52.31 +25:16:25.5: ref_mag=11.21 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4037 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:32:17.88 +33:35:12.4: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3813 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:05:43.40 +34:26:03.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7226 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:26:44.41 +35:03:24.7: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6253 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:07.63 +26:36:34.2: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=12.0560 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:34:42.47 +34:03:43.7: ref_mag=12.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8620 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:19:29.33 +30:51:26.8: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:32.39 +32:08:42.0: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:32.39 +32:08:42.0: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5939 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:19:29.33 +30:51:26.8: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:29.33 +30:51:26.8: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6983 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:30:55.12 +28:57:41.4: 13.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:23.92 +32:10:59.5: 13.35 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:29:50.58 +24:50:29.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:55:53.12 +32:10:13.6: 13.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:44:35.56 +27:52:30.7: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:45.25 +31:32:26.7: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:30:55.12 +28:57:41.4: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:30:55.12 +28:57:41.4: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1154 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:35.56 +27:52:30.7: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:35.56 +27:52:30.7: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1392 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:44:23.92 +32:10:59.5: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:44:23.92 +32:10:59.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1732 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:29:50.58 +24:50:29.1: 15.98 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:55:53.12 +32:10:13.6: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:55:53.12 +32:10:13.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1628 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:04:23.02 +32:58:02.6: 13.54 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.80 +33:39:11.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:45.25 +31:32:26.7: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:45.25 +31:32:26.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2847 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:49.4: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:04:23.02 +32:58:02.6: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:04:23.02 +32:58:02.6: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4420 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.80 +33:39:11.8: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.80 +33:39:11.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3585 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:03:19.61 +34:13:54.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:11:38.79 +29:48:37.9: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:41:13.52 +28:42:39.5: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:07:46.14 +33:41:32.1: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:49.4: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:28:40.93 +30:22:49.4: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4329 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:45:19.77 +26:53:24.3: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:21:11.61 +30:56:19.8: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:03:19.61 +34:13:54.8: 13.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:03:19.61 +34:13:54.8: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4961 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:11:38.79 +29:48:37.9: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:41:13.52 +28:42:39.5: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:07:46.14 +33:41:32.1: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:11:38.79 +29:48:37.9: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4060 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:46.14 +33:41:32.1: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4619 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:41:13.52 +28:42:39.5: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6154 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:45:19.77 +26:53:24.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:21:11.61 +30:56:19.8: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:45:19.77 +26:53:24.3: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6083 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:11.61 +30:56:19.8: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5068 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:22:27.48 +32:03:55.9: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:29:40.17 +33:54:33.1: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:48:55.54 +28:04:47.8: 13.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:17:41.31 +31:26:06.2: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:22:27.48 +32:03:55.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:22:27.48 +32:03:55.9: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7128 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:57:07.90 +32:01:51.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:46:03.12 +28:51:33.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 03:59:36.50 +31:21:50.3: 14.00 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:29:40.17 +33:54:33.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:17:41.31 +31:26:06.2: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:48:55.54 +28:04:47.8: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:41.31 +31:26:06.2: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6638 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:55.54 +28:04:47.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8677 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-01_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0155.fits at 04:12:18.74 +33:14:21.0: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:46:03.12 +28:51:33.5: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:46:03.12 +28:51:33.5: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7411 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:57:07.90 +32:01:51.4: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 03:59:36.50 +31:21:50.3: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:07.90 +32:01:51.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2921 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:59:36.50 +31:21:50.3: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9954 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-27-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0156.fits at 04:12:18.74 +33:14:21.0: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:12:18.74 +33:14:21.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6730 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117765.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out118089.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117538_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117541_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117541_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:29:49.13 +29:06:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117548_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117550_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117552_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117552_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117553_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117553_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117555_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117555_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117556_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117556_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117635_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117635_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:49.10 +33:34:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117704_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117704_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117720_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117738_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:04.44 +25:32:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117754_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117754_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117765_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 117765_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117770_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:33.17 +34:09:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117796_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:36.05 +34:06:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117811_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117811_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117816_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117816_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:31.75 +33:49:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117827_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117827_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117832_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117832_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117834_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117834_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117857_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:35.49 +34:07:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117858_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117858_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117866_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117866_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:23.22 +33:51:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117868_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117868_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:24.93 +32:27:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117874_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117874_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:45.49 +34:21:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117883_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117894_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:02.56 +29:01:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117897_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117898_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117898_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117905_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:06.74 +33:36:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117908_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:29.76 +33:27:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117917_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117921_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117921_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117941_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117942_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117942_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117950_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117954_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117967_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117967_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:11.20 +25:53:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117993_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 117993_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:48.27 +27:33:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118030_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:17.96 +33:49:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118040_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118040_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:37:56.96 +34:56:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118053_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118056_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118056_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:06.17 +32:33:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118089_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
Preparing report for the candidate 118089_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118101_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118101_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:21.32 +33:28:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118102_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118112_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118112_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:28.20 +33:18:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118130_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118139_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118139_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:03:08.88 +34:51:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118148_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118179_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 118179_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 110522_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:51:16.23 +33:02:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 110352_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 52535_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:56.04 +30:22:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 81784_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:07:01.15 +28:53:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 84145_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:01.71 +27:15:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 11217_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:15.28 +33:48:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 11025_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:38.01 +34:15:54.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 23744_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:44.72 +33:15:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303
The candidate 54567_fd_Tau-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-30_04-09-35_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0303 did not pass the final checks