This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.0931 2461281.5931 11.88 17:39:04.99 -11:30:56.8
14.16972 10.35445 galactic Ser Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.51 Nemausa 1 0 1 12.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:04.99 -11:30:56.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:04.99 -11:30:56.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 29.0931* 17 39 04.99 -11 30 56.8 11.9 U Ser 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.5931,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.0931 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.0931 2461281.5931 12.02 17:33:21.49 -08:43:12.5
15.89253 12.99157 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.216 Kleopatra -0 1 1 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:33:21.49 -08:43:12.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:33:21.49 -08:43:12.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.5931,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.0931 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.0931 2461281.5931 13.09 16:41:52.82 -07:04:45.1
10.14239 24.63966 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -1 0 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:41:52.82 -07:04:45.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:41:52.82 -07:04:45.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.5931,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.0931 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 29.0931 2461281.5931 14.57 17:10:35.02 -06:28:47.8
14.85356 18.98053 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.780 Armenia 0 0 0 14.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:10:35.02 -06:28:47.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:10:35.02 -06:28:47.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461281.5931,14.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260829.0931 14.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461281.59346678 29.08.2026 02:14:25.530 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7126
Objects passed selection criteria: 7108
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5705
Average stars matched: 5513 (96.6345 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 233304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 21:17:04 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
First image: 2461234.73999438 13.07.2026 05:45:25.514 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Last image: 2461281.59346678 29.08.2026 02:14:25.530 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 19 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 68961
Objects passed selection criteria: 68849
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61000
Average stars matched: 58228.2 (95.4561 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 559420 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 21:18:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461281.59271765
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:58.220 -09:59:05.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:58.220 -09:59:05.42
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:01.082 -09:59:37.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:09:01.082 -09:59:37.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1080 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:58.220 -09:59:05.42
Second-epoch second image center 17:09:01.082 -09:59:37.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01470 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BhN264zrh8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vaxCzZbL67
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sF7bEBAsx5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iHbOGuBw2K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.683900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.683900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.71
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2330 deg, Dec -15.2610 to -4.7059 deg
Loaded 4092 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3407 out of 3536 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3536 out of 7326 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0927 to 265.2378 deg, Dec -15.2499 to -4.7061 deg
Loaded 4090 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3396 out of 3529 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3529 out of 7427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.2 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.2 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
2.1 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.0 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BhN264zrh8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=430, bad_region=0, passed=7326
Got 7326 stars (including 6888 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4798 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4751 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4797 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7326 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4749 stars left (next iteration limit 5225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4749 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.574 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.626 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.635 n_q1=934 n_q2=1126 n_q3=1731 n_q4=958 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.vaxCzZbL67 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=444, bad_region=0, passed=7427
Got 7427 stars (including 6977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.2 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4799 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4748 stars left (next iteration limit 5222)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4748 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.569 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.632 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.657 n_q1=940 n_q2=1118 n_q3=1731 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.154
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.sF7bEBAsx5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=295, bad_region=0, passed=4088
Got 4088 stars (including 3789 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3602 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3602 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3602 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3642 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3603 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 3603 stars left (next iteration limit 3962)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3603 robust_rms=12.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3603 robust_rms=0.481 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3603 robust_rms=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.347 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3603 robust_rms_before=0.776 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.379 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.313 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.429 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.347
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:58.216 -09:59:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4088 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3875144.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.776 -> 0.313 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits N_match=3603 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=634 n_q2=816 n_q3=1409 n_q4=744 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.194
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.iHbOGuBw2K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=294, bad_region=0, passed=4144
Got 4144 stars (including 3843 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3682 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3641 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3640 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3682 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3643 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3643 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 3643 stars left (next iteration limit 4004)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3643 robust_rms=12.203 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.270 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3643 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.566 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3643 robust_rms=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3643 robust_rms_before=0.801 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.441 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.365 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.533 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.413
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:01.076 -09:59:37.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 4144 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3875152.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.801 -> 0.365 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=3643 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.369 n_q1=639 n_q2=837 n_q3=1437 n_q4=730 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.574 worst_q_ratio=1.107
ref2=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.569 worst_q_ratio=1.154
new1=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.194
new2=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.5715 worst_q_ratio=1.1305
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (4749 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (4748 matched stars from wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012_astrometric_residuals.png (3603 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013_astrometric_residuals.png (3643 matched stars from wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.11 -06:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20528_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.47 -11:59:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20569_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20569_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:36.15 -05:27:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20648_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20648_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.45 -09:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20708_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20708_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.12 -14:05:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20280_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.61 -05:49:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 05492_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.61 -13:13:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 06265_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.94 -15:03:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Image size: 937.2'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:08:58.216 -09:59:05.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:08:58.216 -09:59:05.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0970 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:09:01.076 -09:59:37.61 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:08:34.764 -09:59:49.68
Second-epoch image center 17:09:01.076 -09:59:37.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1080 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 17:08:58.216 -09:59:05.83
Second-epoch second image center 17:09:01.076 -09:59:37.61
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01469 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YKlYFH4UgJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TgyzCKmTpe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K0a6Pg2Woz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WGG2XVGwkG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits and wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits) and catalog (wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.498300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.498300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.11
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 74385 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0750 to 265.2431 deg, Dec -15.2614 to -4.6930 deg
Loaded 4106 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3164 out of 3624 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3624 out of 74385 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 74425 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 249.0774 to 265.2468 deg, Dec -15.2519 to -4.6849 deg
Loaded 4105 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3188 out of 3620 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3620 out of 74425 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 121 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
2.0 pix Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
2.0 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
1.9 pix fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
15.1 mag. Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.YKlYFH4UgJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=4056, bad_region=1, passed=74370
Got 74370 stars (including 70164 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74370 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4808 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4765 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4765 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74370 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5241)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.543 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.628 n_q1=994 n_q2=1121 n_q3=1676 n_q4=971 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TgyzCKmTpe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits' -> 'wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4093, bad_region=1, passed=74415
Got 74415 stars (including 70204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 74415 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4763 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4760 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 74415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4760 stars left (next iteration limit 5238)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits N_match=4760 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.561 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.642 n_q1=982 n_q2=1110 n_q3=1696 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.144
The image catalog is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits -region wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.K0a6Pg2Woz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1598, bad_region=0, passed=47269
Got 47269 stars (including 45573 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47269 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4811 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4767 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4767 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4810 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47269 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5243)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=11.151 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.484 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.329 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.357 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.329 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.356 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.357
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.356 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.441 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=928 n_q2=1134 n_q3=1764 n_q4=940 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.187
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WGG2XVGwkG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1579, bad_region=0, passed=49731
Got 49731 stars (including 48037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 49731 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4761 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4761 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4807 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4762 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 49731 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4762 stars left (next iteration limit 5237)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=11.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.554 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4762 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4762 robust_rms_before=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.421 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.417 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.415
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.417 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits N_match=4762 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.389 n_q1=912 n_q2=1154 n_q3=1765 n_q4=931 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.153
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits -region wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-13-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0012.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_211510_TTUQ1b1x1_3743599_k5LlZwjA/wcs_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Oph-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:04:35.85 -08:41:29.8: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:45:45.60 -05:55:40.1: 13.85 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:15:13.94 -04:59:05.1: 14.00 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:08:59.68 -10:05:15.6: 14.53 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:03:19.48 -06:55:01.9: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:19.40 -14:06:38.8: 13.84 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:08:58.66 -05:53:50.6: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:07:14.64 -05:11:18.6: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:57:42.06 -05:08:06.4: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:45:45.60 -05:55:40.1: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:08:59.68 -10:05:15.6: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:19.40 -14:06:38.8: 13.75 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:45.60 -05:55:40.1: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0236 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:59.68 -10:05:15.6: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5134 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:19.40 -14:06:38.8: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6760 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:07:14.64 -05:11:18.6: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:04:35.85 -08:41:29.8: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:15:13.94 -04:59:05.1: 13.92 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:03:19.48 -06:55:01.9: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:07:14.64 -05:11:18.6: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1012 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:04:35.85 -08:41:29.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0852 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:08:58.66 -05:53:50.6: 14.02 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:15:13.94 -04:59:05.1: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1498 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:03:19.48 -06:55:01.9: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5297 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:08:58.66 -05:53:50.6: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2047 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:09:31.31 -05:37:36.8: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:57:42.06 -05:08:06.4: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:42.06 -05:08:06.4: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1090 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:09:31.31 -05:37:36.8: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:09:31.31 -05:37:36.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9516 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:41:57.40 -12:10:23.7: 13.64 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:55:16.31 -06:22:10.9: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:12:51.42 -09:49:12.3: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:43:39.52 -05:13:25.6: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:22.06 -07:06:38.3: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:33.2: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:12.22 -08:46:01.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:41:57.40 -12:10:23.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:55:16.31 -06:22:10.9: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:12:51.42 -09:49:12.3: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:41:57.40 -12:10:23.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8735 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:55:16.31 -06:22:10.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5357 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:12:51.42 -09:49:12.3: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7891 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:45:34.81 -09:27:48.9: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:12.22 -08:46:01.3: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:22.06 -07:06:38.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:43:39.52 -05:13:25.6: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:33.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.55 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:12.22 -08:46:01.3: ref_mag=13.55 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4344 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:22.06 -07:06:38.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3157 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:39.52 -05:13:25.6: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5211 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:19.07 -08:04:33.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4396 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:45:34.81 -09:27:48.9: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:34.81 -09:27:48.9: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2991 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:47:06.60 -08:26:56.2: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:53:47.66 -04:47:06.6: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.87 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:58:27.26 -06:05:58.1: ref_mag=12.87 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0727 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:04.99 -11:30:56.8: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:33:21.49 -08:43:12.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:53:47.66 -04:47:06.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:47:06.60 -08:26:56.2: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.31 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:53:47.66 -04:47:06.6: ref_mag=12.31 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4577 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:06.60 -08:26:56.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8562 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:41:52.82 -07:04:45.1: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:04.99 -11:30:56.8: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:33:21.49 -08:43:12.5: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.7: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:41:52.82 -07:04:45.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:02:58.67 -06:22:16.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1740 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:00.85 -15:05:23.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:39:38.88 -13:53:15.5: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:00.85 -15:05:23.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:00.85 -15:05:23.7: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:25:54.32 -07:59:35.7: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:39:38.88 -13:53:15.5: 13.96 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:39:38.88 -13:53:15.5: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.6411 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:20:00.58 -08:00:26.8: 13.88 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:40:56.07 -04:53:28.8: 14.54 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:37:45.60 -13:06:34.8: 14.62 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:25:54.32 -07:59:35.7: 14.04 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:25:54.32 -07:59:35.7: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9220 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:20:00.58 -08:00:26.8: 13.89 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:20:00.58 -08:00:26.8: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9090 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:35.20 -13:37:45.1: 14.44 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:40:56.07 -04:53:28.8: 14.55 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:56.07 -04:53:28.8: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0967 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:22.03 -13:19:23.2: 14.71 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:37:45.60 -13:06:34.8: 14.49 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:52.17 -14:28:20.1: 14.53 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:37:45.60 -13:06:34.8: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1246 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:35.20 -13:37:45.1: 14.33 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:35.20 -13:37:45.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0018 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:22.03 -13:19:23.2: 14.52 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:22.03 -13:19:23.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.1499 delta=0.45 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:40:22.41 -07:27:47.8: 14.62 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:52.17 -14:28:20.1: 14.43 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.17 -14:28:20.1: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.0976 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:30:26.13 -05:19:06.8: 15.01 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:39:06.31 -07:03:02.2: 14.66 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:40:22.41 -07:27:47.8: 14.55 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:22.41 -07:27:47.8: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1881 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:30:26.13 -05:19:06.8: 14.84 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:30:26.13 -05:19:06.8: ref_mag=14.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.1589 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:45:47.42 -12:54:43.9: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:39:06.31 -07:03:02.2: 14.68 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:06.31 -07:03:02.2: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2517 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:24:57.70 -06:02:14.0: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:45:47.42 -12:54:43.9: 14.22 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:47.42 -12:54:43.9: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0658 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:40:11.07 -05:21:40.3: 14.38 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:38:01.71 -10:33:47.5: 14.31 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:47:22.78 -06:23:45.9: 14.60 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:24:57.70 -06:02:14.0: 14.05 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:44:00.95 -04:57:10.5: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:24:57.70 -06:02:14.0: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9870 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:40:11.07 -05:21:40.3: 14.40 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:11.07 -05:21:40.3: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2905 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:38:01.71 -10:33:47.5: 14.48 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:01.71 -10:33:47.5: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3477 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:47:22.78 -06:23:45.9: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:22.78 -06:23:45.9: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3350 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:44:00.95 -04:57:10.5: 14.78 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.63 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:00.95 -04:57:10.5: ref_mag=14.63 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2629 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:42:17.23 -07:03:40.4: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:57:40.81 -05:26:45.7: 14.66 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 17:10:35.02 -06:28:47.8: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-45-25_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0012.fits at 16:39:17.08 -06:31:18.4: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:42:17.23 -07:03:40.4: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:17.23 -07:03:40.4: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.4045 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:57:40.81 -05:26:45.7: 14.69 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.67 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:57:40.81 -05:26:45.7: ref_mag=14.67 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5581 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 17:10:35.02 -06:28:47.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-13_00-46-05_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0013.fits at 16:39:17.08 -06:31:18.4: 14.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:17.08 -06:31:18.4: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5544 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92764.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92794.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out93304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94754.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92417_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92420_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92420_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92426_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92426_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:27.50 -09:06:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92429_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92429_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92431_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:10:10.70 -10:17:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92437_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92437_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92440_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92440_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92444_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92444_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92446_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92446_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92447_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:06:00.66 -06:06:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92448_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92450_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92452_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:22.19 -08:36:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92453_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92457_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:20.98 -06:19:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92458_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:47.18 -08:43:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92462_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92462_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:10.65 -13:30:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92467_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92467_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:26.45 -05:25:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92469_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:04.79 -11:22:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92473_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92473_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92474_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92474_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:12.06 -11:23:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92476_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92478_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92478_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92480_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92480_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92481_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:22.56 -05:35:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92482_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92483_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:45.17 -05:17:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92484_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92484_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92486_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92486_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:24.80 -07:56:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92488_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92489_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92489_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92490_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92490_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:27.11 -06:23:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92561_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92561_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:38.41 -15:11:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 92764_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92789_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.84 -06:04:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92794_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 92794_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92928_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 92928_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:17.65 -12:14:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93182_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93182_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:53.43 -14:47:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93187_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:11.68 -11:22:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93206_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:38.50 -14:39:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93279_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:21.13 -08:49:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:15.88 -05:51:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 93304_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93318_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93318_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:37:15.48 -13:14:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93397_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93419_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93419_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:33.36 -14:03:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93436_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:46.70 -14:40:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93477_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93477_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:45.60 -08:23:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93534_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93534_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:56.73 -06:46:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93551_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93551_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:47.89 -14:37:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93566_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93566_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:25.82 -14:10:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93574_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93574_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:20:16.10 -12:32:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93575_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:35:32.59 -11:06:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93591_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:27:18.82 -14:01:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93646_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93646_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:47.54 -08:10:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93668_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:44.73 -05:37:39.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93720_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93720_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:41:00.31 -13:47:29.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93805_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:01.73 -14:05:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93816_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93816_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:45.96 -11:46:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93881_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93881_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:23.95 -05:15:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93970_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 93970_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:57:37.39 -08:12:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94006_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94006_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94013_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94013_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:32:24.19 -14:23:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94025_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94025_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:28:55.45 -13:02:47.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94099_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94099_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94105_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94105_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:08:36.96 -07:37:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94158_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94158_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:56.24 -08:21:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94167_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94167_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:02.31 -11:26:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94174_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94174_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:00.93 -07:59:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94253_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:29:49.17 -10:07:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94294_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94294_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:54:44.55 -11:48:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94297_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94297_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94345_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94345_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:55:05.17 -10:41:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94352_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94352_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94383_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94383_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94414_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94414_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:22:34.26 -05:40:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94428_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94428_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94433_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94459_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94466_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94466_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94471_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94471_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94472_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94509_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:35.84 -08:00:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94514_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:36:03.31 -10:13:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94546_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94546_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94558_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94558_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:09.74 -13:23:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94570_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94570_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:49.82 -05:37:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94588_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94588_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94609_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94609_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94622_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94622_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94639_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94639_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94648_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94648_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94660_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94660_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:42:06.72 -08:08:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94678_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94678_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:52:03.44 -04:53:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94687_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94687_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:04:45.83 -07:44:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94698_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94698_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94745_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94745_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94754_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
Preparing report for the candidate 94754_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94756_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 94756_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 53752_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:23:33.80 -13:59:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 05943_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:15.65 -05:47:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 90510_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:01:00.47 -09:02:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 09091_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:38:35.95 -06:16:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 33802_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:21:15.56 -10:25:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 46293_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:31:41.09 -14:05:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 54778_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:50.49 -11:59:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 20910_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:33:26.89 -08:19:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 25532_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.45 -09:06:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 05876_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:21.69 -05:49:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07292_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 07292_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:25:43.39 -06:00:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 06381_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:48.69 -05:50:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 33350_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:30:19.90 -10:18:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63461_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 63461_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:37.63 -13:13:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 60969_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:34:22.77 -13:42:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 39620_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:15:00.95 -15:03:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47173_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 47173_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:19:12.94 -13:41:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013
The candidate 03935_fd_Oph-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_21-14-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0013 did not pass the final checks