This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.4565 2461280.9565 11.98 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6
224.64097 -0.57268 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 8.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" GDS_J0710585-104014
Type: VAR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.480 r Y 0.450 r M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GDS_J0710585-104014,2461280.9565,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GDS_J0710585-104014 20260828.4565 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.4565 2461280.9565 11.06 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7
226.83276 -0.44369 galactic CMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J071535-1233.2
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.400 V Y 1.170 V 2452025.70000 68.200000000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J071535-1233.2,2461280.9565,11.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J071535-1233.2 20260828.4565 11.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 28.4565 2461280.9565 10.61 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9
223.26482 1.85720 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASAS J071706-0819.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.100 V Y 0.660 V 2452176.10000 128.000000000000 M5
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J071706-0819.4,2461280.9565,10.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J071706-0819.4 20260828.4565 10.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461280.95684300 28.08.2026 10:57:41.235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22292
Objects passed selection criteria: 22155
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14274.2
Average stars matched: 13829.2 (96.8825 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 05:59:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
First image: 2461139.59921253 09.04.2026 02:22:41.963 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Last image: 2461280.95684300 28.08.2026 10:57:41.235 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 106
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150078
Objects passed selection criteria: 149590
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 104766
Average stars matched: 100602 (96.0261 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 614232 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Aug 28 06:00:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.95618029
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iJqphU22LZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g2MTmMjsc0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7c60ebiy6p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ibmJqxZ6lB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.675200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.675200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.03
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8919 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5750 deg
Loaded 21843 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14945 out of 16014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16014 out of 23708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=6.6)
Read 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0361 deg, Dec -15.2871 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21874 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14942 out of 16020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16020 out of 23764 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.5 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.5 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.6 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.7 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
12.9 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.9 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.iJqphU22LZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2215, bad_region=0, passed=23708
Got 23708 stars (including 21478 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.489 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.697 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.720 n_q1=1581 n_q2=1059 n_q3=1271 n_q4=991 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.276
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.g2MTmMjsc0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2234, bad_region=0, passed=23764
Got 23764 stars (including 21517 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23764 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23764 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.715 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.687 n_q1=1575 n_q2=1063 n_q3=1264 n_q4=994 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.227
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7c60ebiy6p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, bad_region=0, passed=4966
Got 4966 stars (including 4532 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4966 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4459 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4424 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4426 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4424 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4460 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4425 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4425 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4966 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4425 stars left (next iteration limit 4866)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4425 robust_rms=7.854 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.137 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4425 robust_rms=0.621 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.215 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4425 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4425 robust_rms_before=1.665 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.458 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.552 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.551
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.552 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4425 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.466 n_q1=995 n_q2=967 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1343 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ibmJqxZ6lB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=424, bad_region=0, passed=5005
Got 5005 stars (including 4577 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5005 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4503 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4467 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4466 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4470 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4470 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5005 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4470 stars left (next iteration limit 4912)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4470 robust_rms=7.612 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.775 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4470 robust_rms=0.614 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4470 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4470 robust_rms_before=1.596 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.466 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.543 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.526
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.543 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4470 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.532 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=1003 n_q2=974 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1378 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.145
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits sigma_overall=0.564 worst_q_ratio=1.276
ref2=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits sigma_overall=0.582 worst_q_ratio=1.227
new1=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.462 worst_q_ratio=1.164
new2=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.465 worst_q_ratio=1.145
reference average sigma_overall=0.573 worst_q_ratio=1.2515
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023_astrometric_residuals.png (4902 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.50 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (4425 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4470 matched stars from wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31542_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31542_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:32.28 -05:16:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31543_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31543_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:44.58 -04:57:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31634_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31634_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:47.36 -10:39:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31737_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31737_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:48.48 -07:55:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08402_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 08402_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:48.11 -07:54:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 16235_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:43.08 -11:33:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 13267_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.77 -09:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 944.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0222 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 944.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:51:31.944 -09:59:40.78
Second-epoch image center 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0312 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:51:36.925 -09:59:09.26
Second-epoch second image center 06:51:39.535 -09:59:47.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01499 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CiN2aPMlAX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fORXSkKEJc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ghrf2fIXxX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cZ2QmmVcA0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits and wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits) and catalog (wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.507200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.507200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.77
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 163412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8860 to 111.0563 deg, Dec -15.2906 to -4.5674 deg
Loaded 21923 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14198 out of 18773 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18773 out of 163412 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 164110 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 94.8842 to 111.0510 deg, Dec -15.2898 to -4.5672 deg
Loaded 21912 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14201 out of 18779 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 18779 out of 164110 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 98 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
2.3 pix Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.4 pix fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
14.8 mag. Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.CiN2aPMlAX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=50, blended=21453, bad_region=1, passed=163362
Got 163362 stars (including 141685 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 163362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4903 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4925 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4903 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 163362 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4903 stars left (next iteration limit 5393)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits N_match=4903 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.562 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.709 n_q1=1497 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1249 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fORXSkKEJc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits' -> 'wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=21473, bad_region=0, passed=164043
Got 164043 stars (including 142348 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 164043 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 164043 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.584 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.516 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.667 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.701 n_q1=1485 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1262 n_q4=1040 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.201
The image catalog is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits -region wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ghrf2fIXxX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1694, bad_region=1, passed=46975
Got 46975 stars (including 45218 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46975 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013121 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010497 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46975 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5369)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=7.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.345 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.961 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.541 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.631 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.467 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.516 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.541
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.516 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.444 n_q1=1107 n_q2=982 n_q3=1310 n_q4=1483 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.159
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.cZ2QmmVcA0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1670, bad_region=1, passed=47712
Got 47712 stars (including 45957 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013118 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010494 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4921 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=7.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.215 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.882 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.551 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.443 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.468 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.500 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1107 n_q2=976 n_q3=1332 n_q4=1469 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-56-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_055816_TTUQ1b1x1_2742624_KNwZOqBp/wcs_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Mon-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:34:00.64 -11:32:35.3: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:39:13.46 -07:37:10.9: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:43:06.18 -09:29:31.8: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:37:10.78 -07:35:33.7: 12.57 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:54:00.10 -09:20:50.6: 11.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:20:20.15 -12:14:27.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:43:06.18 -09:29:31.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:34:00.64 -11:32:35.3: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:39:13.46 -07:37:10.9: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:37:10.78 -07:35:33.7: 12.61 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:06.18 -09:29:31.8: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9918 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:13.46 -07:37:10.9: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8616 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:10.78 -07:35:33.7: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7387 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:00.64 -11:32:35.3: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5302 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:52:09.24 -07:40:13.9: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:08:15.41 -11:35:24.3: 11.27 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:54:00.10 -09:20:50.6: 11.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:20:20.15 -12:14:27.3: 11.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:54:00.10 -09:20:50.6: ref_mag=11.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1257 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:20.15 -12:14:27.3: ref_mag=11.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8164 delta=-0.62 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:25:03.29 -09:07:10.6: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:52:09.24 -07:40:13.9: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.88 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:09.24 -07:40:13.9: ref_mag=11.88 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1111 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:08:15.41 -11:35:24.3: 11.28 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.28 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:08:15.41 -11:35:24.3: ref_mag=11.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7659 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:25:03.29 -09:07:10.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:03.29 -09:07:10.6: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3233 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:07:10.67 -12:11:34.5: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:16:49.64 -09:44:29.7: 11.51 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:09:13.63 -07:04:53.6: 11.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:07:10.67 -12:11:34.5: 11.38 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:16:49.64 -09:44:29.7: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:10.67 -12:11:34.5: ref_mag=11.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4483 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:49.64 -09:44:29.7: ref_mag=11.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6085 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:34:14.49 -04:53:32.2: 12.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:34.8: 12.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:09:13.63 -07:04:53.6: 11.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:13.63 -07:04:53.6: ref_mag=11.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9346 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:42:33.70 -10:45:26.3: 12.93 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:34:14.49 -04:53:32.2: 12.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:31:59.75 -14:20:02.9: 12.50 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:34:14.49 -04:53:32.2: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6092 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:48:16.01 -07:45:24.1: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:34.8: 12.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:52:20.15 -05:11:34.8: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4275 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:42:33.70 -10:45:26.3: 12.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:33.70 -10:45:26.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9535 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:31:59.75 -14:20:02.9: 12.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:48:16.01 -07:45:24.1: 13.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:31:59.75 -14:20:02.9: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5158 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:20:43.07 -11:34:36.1: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:16.01 -07:45:24.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1791 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6: 12.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:20:43.07 -11:34:36.1: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:43.07 -11:34:36.1: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2597 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6: 13.01 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:10:58.04 -10:40:14.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.9555 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 06:22:59.19 -05:54:11.7: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7: 12.22 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 06:22:59.19 -05:54:11.7: 12.74 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.68 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:59.19 -05:54:11.7: ref_mag=12.68 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5804 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:15:35.08 -12:33:09.7: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.0647 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9: 11.66 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:17:06.39 -08:19:26.9: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.5964 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-22-41_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0023.fits at 07:00:40.12 -14:20:57.9: 9.59 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-04-08_21-23-15_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHT_0024.fits at 07:00:40.12 -14:20:57.9: 9.55 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 9.57 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:40.12 -14:20:57.9: ref_mag=9.57 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=8.6716 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100558.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133637.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64833.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187968_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187968_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187970_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187970_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187973_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187973_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:17.43 -04:52:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187974_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187974_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.23 -07:15:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187979_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187979_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:06.64 -07:12:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187989_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187989_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187991_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187991_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:28.40 -04:49:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187995_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187995_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:37.80 -05:05:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187997_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187997_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 187998_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:34.58 -08:08:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188005_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188005_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:16.55 -05:08:25.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188007_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188007_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:26.31 -05:01:49.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188008_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188008_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:39.11 -07:37:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188009_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188009_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188010_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188010_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:46.99 -05:48:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188011_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188011_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188012_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188012_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:56.98 -05:56:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188013_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188013_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188015_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188015_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188021_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188021_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:22.64 -08:27:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188022_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188022_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188023_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188023_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:00.94 -06:51:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188024_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188024_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:56.43 -06:01:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188025_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188025_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:42.26 -05:15:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188026_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188026_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:43.37 -05:34:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188027_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188027_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.21 -06:06:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188028_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188028_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:04.57 -13:23:01.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188029_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188029_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:14.02 -08:02:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188030_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188030_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:33.92 -13:50:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188031_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188031_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:39.57 -05:14:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188032_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188032_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:33.90 -06:18:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188034_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188034_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:37.94 -12:37:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188035_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188035_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:53.55 -06:35:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188037_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188037_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:32.24 -05:16:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188038_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188038_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:21.96 -12:25:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188064_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188064_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:38.33 -13:33:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188268_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188268_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:22.65 -12:39:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188301_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188301_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:54.45 -04:49:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188318_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188318_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:07.85 -05:33:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188376_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188376_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:33.33 -05:56:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188564_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188564_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:22.11 -14:20:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188667_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188667_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:11.46 -06:28:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188680_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188680_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:20.08 -07:30:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188712_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188712_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:33.46 -10:06:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188716_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188716_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:27.34 -06:21:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188775_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188775_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:20.46 -09:01:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188797_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188797_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188893_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188893_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:49.14 -08:18:11.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188918_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188918_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:36.25 -13:50:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188940_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188940_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188949_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188949_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:18.21 -05:51:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188993_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 188993_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:46.03 -05:15:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189006_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189006_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:18.90 -12:51:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189023_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189023_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189029_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189029_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:41.08 -08:57:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189125_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189125_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:03.05 -07:54:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189175_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189175_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:57.96 -14:46:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189184_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189184_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:47.61 -06:39:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:53.62 -09:27:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189217_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189217_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:11.18 -06:02:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189227_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189227_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.61 -10:39:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189255_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189255_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189282_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189282_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189357_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189357_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:09.72 -14:06:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189394_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189394_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:20.28 -06:31:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189401_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189401_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:44.58 -08:48:40.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189409_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189409_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:35.19 -09:12:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189420_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189420_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:41.10 -05:13:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189441_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189441_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:40.53 -06:03:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189491_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189491_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189765_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189765_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189787_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189787_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189799_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 189799_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:15.80 -08:46:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 74210_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:29.83 -08:57:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175682_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 175682_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100558_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 100558_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 83790_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:15.36 -09:39:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 92988_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:09.58 -10:17:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102199_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 102199_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:00.64 -10:57:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82823_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 82823_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:44.35 -09:35:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159356_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 159356_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:37.39 -14:22:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133637_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 133637_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149381_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 149381_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:20.01 -11:46:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18975_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 18975_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159504_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 159504_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:03.92 -14:20:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 133219_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:41.04 -12:45:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64833_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 64833_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55387_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 55387_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:48.12 -07:54:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 89187_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:25.73 -09:57:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 115211_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:40.89 -14:12:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97763_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 97763_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:50.04 -10:37:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 125996_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:24.26 -13:12:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125203_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 125203_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:49.42 -13:15:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115335_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 115335_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58385_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 58385_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:48.46 -07:55:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 112306_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:43.16 -11:33:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33359_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33359_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:41.73 -06:41:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 31528_fd_Mon-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_05-57-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks