Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SU UMa,2461280.8561,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SU UMa 20260828.3561 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-02-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-02-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1057552 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1057552 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits

renamed 'UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits_preview.png'
UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 521.0909
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.9001
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 9776.3711
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 2413.0286
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 9739.6140
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 2401.6926
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 18.7614
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T03:32:03.5898879' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T08:32:03.5898879' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.3555970951 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T08:32:13.4912781' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.3557117013 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 128.569995737098 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9995912878468 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 14.9352777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.0963888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.82618974342382 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29528 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29528 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 333.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits :)
Spent 0.490926 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T03:33:01.9592427' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T08:33:01.9592427' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.3562726737 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T08:33:11.8601894' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.3563872683 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 128.569995655781 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 61.9995913269843 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.015 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 23.1819444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.80693058428005 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-02' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '08 34 17' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29528 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29528 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 63.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 333.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 1.800144 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits :)
Spent 0.485369 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/d_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits

fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.85571284
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00454 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4xLkM9EUIa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ewsEVCmde7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LIRTXSmlpe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YEKcanTUXi
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.868000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.868000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4100 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5418 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4100 deg
Loaded 8849 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5401 out of 5701 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5701 out of 9619 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec +55.4555 to +67.4099 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5413 deg, Dec 55.4555 to 67.4099 deg
Loaded 8848 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5383 out of 5695 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5695 out of 9596 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.2 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.3 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
13.0 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
13.0 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.0 (SNR ) 10.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.4xLkM9EUIa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, bad_region=0, passed=9619
Got 9619 stars (including 8917 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9619 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9619 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1045 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1046 n_q4=1382 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.433
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ewsEVCmde7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=696, bad_region=0, passed=9596
Got 9596 stars (including 8884 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9596 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 789 (Dec 55.5 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9596 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1037 n_q2=1434 n_q3=1042 n_q4=1388 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.387
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.LIRTXSmlpe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=205, bad_region=0, passed=1740
Got 1740 stars (including 1533 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1740 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1500 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1494 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1498 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1498 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1732 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 1498 stars left (next iteration limit 1647)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1498 robust_rms=7.103 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.337 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1498 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.834 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1498 robust_rms=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.531 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1498 robust_rms_before=1.609 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.410 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.386 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.511 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.531
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits N_match=1498 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.446 n_q1=441 n_q2=232 n_q3=485 n_q4=340 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.274
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.YEKcanTUXi (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=200, bad_region=0, passed=1737
Got 1737 stars (including 1536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1503 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 729 to 788 (Dec 56.0 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1502 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1501 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1501 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 1501 stars left (next iteration limit 1652)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1501 robust_rms=7.625 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.131 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1501 robust_rms=0.495 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.953 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1501 robust_rms=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1501 robust_rms_before=1.481 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.394 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.391 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.569 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.659
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.569 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=1501 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.416 n_q1=450 n_q2=240 n_q3=471 n_q4=340 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.523
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits sigma_overall=0.353 worst_q_ratio=1.433
ref2=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.387
new1=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.274
new2=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.409 worst_q_ratio=1.523
reference average sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.41
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294_astrometric_residuals.png (1498 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (1501 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20567_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 20567_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 10.56 | 07:54:26.90 +65:18:53.6 | 2178 5253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 07:54:26.88 +65:18:53.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 09362_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 9.62 | 07:55:50.90 +57:11:54.9 | 1792 0353 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 07:55:50.94 +57:11:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Image size: 944.3'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0049 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 944.2'x627.3' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 08:34:18.663 +61:59:38.81
Second-epoch image center 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0084 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 08:34:17.419 +61:59:54.12
Second-epoch second image center 08:34:15.114 +61:59:56.03
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00454 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xPOpYqoLq5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mk2b66UuV6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.78FdVFCmu6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1M989RqLDm
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits and wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg
Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 56661 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec +55.3287 to +67.4112 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5794 deg, Dec 55.3287 to 67.4112 deg
Loaded 8955 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5034 out of 5776 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5776 out of 56661 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 56645 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec +55.3459 to +67.4186 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 109.7385 to 148.5789 deg, Dec 55.3459 to 67.4186 deg
Loaded 8948 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5045 out of 5770 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5770 out of 56645 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 28 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
2.0 pix UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
13.1 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
13.2 mag. fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.xPOpYqoLq5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2986, bad_region=5, passed=56640
Got 56640 stars (including 53549 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56640 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56640 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.313 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.281 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1417 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1400 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.408
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.mk2b66UuV6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2922, bad_region=5, passed=56624
Got 56624 stars (including 53603 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56624 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56624 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1040 n_q2=1423 n_q3=1040 n_q4=1391 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.345
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.78FdVFCmu6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=301, bad_region=1, passed=12345
Got 12345 stars (including 12019 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12345 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12345 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4884 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=6.815 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.579 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.986 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4884 robust_rms=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4884 robust_rms_before=1.612 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.468 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.485 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.591 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.648
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.591 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits N_match=4884 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.575 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=1451 n_q2=774 n_q3=1646 n_q4=1013 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1M989RqLDm (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=294, bad_region=1, passed=12425
Got 12425 stars (including 12111 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12425 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.7 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12425 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=6.727 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=20.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.571 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.993 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.475 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.462 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.503 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.641 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.729
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.641 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1435 n_q2=783 n_q3=1662 n_q4=1002 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.367
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/wcs_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:37:13.04 +61:49:44.5: 11.02 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 07:43:31.60 +62:32:08.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-17-21_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0302.fits at 08:09:30.80 +65:41:20.6: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:37:13.04 +61:49:44.5: 11.00 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.01 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:37:13.04 +61:49:44.5: ref_mag=11.01 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2402 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 07:43:31.60 +62:32:08.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:43:31.60 +62:32:08.4: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5262 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-18-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0303.fits at 08:09:30.80 +65:41:20.6: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:09:30.80 +65:41:20.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8726 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70709_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70709_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.14 | 08:05:58.14 +58:12:49.5 | 2660 0914 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 08:05:58.21 +58:12:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70710_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70710_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.18 | 07:50:55.17 +60:42:21.6 | 1636 2508 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 07:50:55.13 +60:42:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70711_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70711_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 28.35571 | 2461280.85571 | 11.18 | 07:37:13.12 +61:49:44.3 | 0735 3319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.31 | 07:37:12.97 +61:49:44.6 | 0737 3319 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70731_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70731_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 10.44 | 07:29:07.84 +61:31:54.0 | 0124 3246 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70752_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70752_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 10.80 | 08:19:03.66 +63:52:30.3 | 3725 4297 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70761_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70761_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 10.78 | 08:30:26.70 +60:41:08.1 | 4550 2394 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 08:30:26.69 +60:41:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70777_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70777_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.06 | 08:40:22.66 +58:55:36.4 | 5358 1382 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70788_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70788_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.21 | 08:30:06.30 +60:40:34.5 | 4525 2387 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 08:30:06.33 +60:40:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70802_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70802_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.75 | 08:28:00.47 +66:29:41.5 | 4273 5886 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70813_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70813_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.81 | 08:44:59.43 +65:37:04.3 | 5342 5422 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70819_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70819_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.81 | 08:43:43.52 +65:52:27.2 | 5250 5569 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70823_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70823_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.61 | 09:31:19.84 +63:02:36.0 | 8607 4470 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 09:31:19.89 +63:02:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70834_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70834_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.73 | 09:10:57.37 +63:32:52.9 | 7183 4437 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 09:10:57.39 +63:32:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70862_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70862_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.00 | 08:18:21.49 +58:00:51.9 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70879_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70879_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.28 | 08:50:47.44 +61:13:03.1 | 6005 2830 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70882_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70882_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 28.35571 | 2461280.85571 | 12.51 | 07:43:31.55 +62:32:07.2 | 1246 3673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.55 | 07:43:31.64 +62:32:09.6 | 1249 3673 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70901_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70901_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.30 | 09:22:32.38 +57:32:47.0 | 8801 1083 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70923_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70923_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.35 | 07:57:57.56 +58:17:43.9 | 2026 1004 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70949_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70949_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.77 | 08:35:12.64 +66:16:45.6 | 4713 5774 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 08:35:12.62 +66:16:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70951_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70951_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.36 | 09:29:40.77 +59:10:00.9 | 9112 2176 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70957_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70957_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 28.35571 | 2461280.85571 | 12.86 | 08:09:30.42 +65:41:20.9 | 3136 5408 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-32-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0294.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.88 | 08:09:31.18 +65:41:20.2 | 3139 5407 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70963_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70963_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 12.52 | 08:35:18.33 +59:10:29.0 | 4957 1504 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70981_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 70981_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 13.03 | 07:57:23.69 +63:39:29.7 | 2275 4236 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 10578_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 10.85 | 07:54:26.88 +65:18:53.4 | 2178 5253 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 07:54:26.89 +65:18:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 26033_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17230_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 17230_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.86 | 08:37:24.14 +63:58:51.2 | 4935 4398 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 08:37:24.16 +63:58:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17952_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 17952_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 11.08 | 09:36:44.31 +62:17:18.4 | 9100 4139 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 09:36:44.31 +62:17:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295
The candidate 36104_fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 28.35639 | 2461280.85639 | 9.68 | 07:55:50.92 +57:11:55.8 | 1792 0353 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_034128_TTUQ1b1x1_2422727_yRJH67lo/fd_UMa-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_03-33-01_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits |
**** FOUND 07:55:50.92 +57:11:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
08:12:28.32 +62:36:21.5
###################################################################################
08:12:28.32 +62:36:21.5 -- listed in neverexclude_list.txt (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.85571284 -observatory V36
10:31:12.38 +11:09:48.4 Mercury (-1.9mag)
13:08:38.57 -10:27:31.7 Venus (-4.6mag)
06:46:42.59 +23:28:56.9 Mars (1.3mag)
09:00:41.45 +17:32:12.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:53:48.20 +02:53:42.8 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:23.24 +21:01:13.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:38.55 +00:02:52.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:20.42 -23:37:02.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:31:51.27 -09:00:18.9 Moon (-12.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 28 03:43 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.85571284:
09:00:37.26 +17:32:34.0 Io (6.2mag)
09:00:33.14 +17:32:53.3 Europa (6.3mag)
09:00:45.71 +17:31:55.7 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:01:10.06 +17:29:59.7 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:58:13.28 +17:43:42.0 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:00:42.36 +17:32:09.7 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:57:53.40 +17:38:38.4 Elara (17.7mag)
09:04:45.70 +17:03:08.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:02:29.25 +17:47:19.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:53:40.77 +02:53:15.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:53:43.92 +02:53:49.0 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:54:22.15 +02:56:11.5 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:53:32.70 +02:53:47.3 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:52:45.90 +02:44:27.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 28 03:43 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.85571284:
20:50:24.20 -08:55:12.6 JWST
18:46:54.44 +12:26:25.1 Chandra
11:13:56.77 -59:59:26.3 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 28 03:43 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.85571284 -observatory V36
03:33:25.43 +18:48:59.8 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:25.42 -34:23:04.1 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:11:34.75 -69:46:43.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:14:15.85 +33:27:02.4 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:34:06.87 +43:45:25.8 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:21:39.34 +29:47:32.2 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:02:09.53 +26:10:07.2 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:40:17.39 +27:36:20.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:42:15.18 +05:16:49.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
20:47:16.40 +63:01:37.6 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:33:13.61 -14:46:13.6 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:29:12.76 +32:19:22.5 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:46.37 +15:26:21.0 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:41:09.43 +43:26:49.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:40:24.47 +49:39:10.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:29:45.70 -12:55:30.7 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:07:35.09 +20:28:51.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:02:21.27 +19:31:25.5 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:11:47.41 +00:54:00.9 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:19:33.04 +75:30:49.0 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:13.49 +46:19:41.5 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:04:11.72 +10:27:12.7 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:17:40.26 -33:43:13.7 7.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:41:35.87 -04:44:26.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:48:31.99 -01:55:03.1 17.5mag 63P/Wild
00:49:27.85 -06:26:51.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:19:23.93 +19:55:26.6 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:21:38.03 -25:29:35.1 17.3mag 84P/Giclas
03:14:57.60 +14:46:15.1 17.0mag 88P/Howell
08:44:12.07 +24:37:29.7 16.5mag 93P/Lovas
05:06:05.83 +24:46:21.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:01:30.06 +27:07:45.2 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:05:26.16 +22:55:03.3 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:25:07.63 -17:48:06.2 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
06:04:49.20 +20:54:26.3 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
07:01:20.70 +17:41:42.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:57:11.43 +02:52:00.2 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
02:59:59.98 -18:21:49.3 12.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:22:40.03 +38:01:29.5 16.2mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:14:27.98 +22:16:42.0 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
03:14:06.98 +09:08:27.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
04:20:27.06 +33:00:36.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:04:27.90 +36:38:26.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:19:17.39 +00:52:28.2 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:19:04.36 +17:21:38.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Aug 28 03:43 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 28 03:43 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 28 03:43 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
23:07:10.081 -46:29:32.67 AT 2026xss 2026-08-01.76 19.43
23:24:16.986 -39:54:38.19 AT 2026xsr 2026-08-01.59 19.34
14:05:54.276 -15:52:29.96 AT 2026xsq 2026-02-17.61 20.88
16:00:02.823 +12:57:02.46 AT 2026xsp 2026-02-13.59 21.18
13:18:25.859 +25:17:53.19 AT 2026xso 2026-02-17.52 21.43
14:46:41.619 +11:38:04.02 AT 2026xsn 2026-02-17.55 20.37
14:12:17.965 +35:36:02.21 AT 2026xsm 2026-02-17.60 20.93
00:28:22.210 -09:16:55.88 AT 2026xsl 2026-08-06.67 20.38
13:40:02.666 +27:45:49.66 AT 2026xsk 2026-02-17.50 21.05
13:18:58.760 +35:13:29.33 AT 2026xsj 2026-02-17.49 21.16
14:58:55.200 +08:49:53.06 AT 2026xsi 2026-02-13.58 21.13
12:22:18.795 +12:08:10.55 AT 2026xsh 2026-02-16.62 20.67
11:46:22.552 +13:15:39.41 AT 2026xsg 2026-02-16.57 20.7
08:55:07.272 +15:47:59.14 AT 2026xsf 2026-02-13.30 20.98
07:34:01.728 +10:29:15.79 AT 2026xse 2026-02-14.26 20.11
07:29:49.030 +19:09:23.06 AT 2026xsd 2026-02-13.26 20.62
07:42:52.595 +22:58:08.19 AT 2026xsc 2026-02-13.26 20.93
04:42:06.854 +06:56:13.00 AT 2026xsb 2026-02-06.24 21.16
05:10:23.116 -06:04:42.26 AT 2026xsa 2026-02-05.30 20.59
05:17:11.087 -07:32:29.20 AT 2026xrz 2026-02-02.30 20.34
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 28 03:43 tns_transients_list.txt