NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-09-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
Field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits
Field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 914986 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 914986 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits_preview.png'
Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits

renamed 'Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits_preview.png'
Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 499.4349 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 678.1268 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6630.6642 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 1509.2677 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 6605.2494 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 1501.0845 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 13.2763 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T02:11:17.4841194' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T07:11:17.4841194' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.2995079164 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T07:11:27.3901950' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.2996225692 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 77.1393087650327 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999203910073 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.0516666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 31.6261111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.19068971647025 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 285.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits :) Spent 0.967667 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-28T02:12:10.8548989' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T07:12:10.8548989' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61280.300125625 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T07:12:20.7578686' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61280.3002402429 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 77.1393086357346 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 61.9999203876682 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 27.15 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 31.6697222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.18342495047686 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 08 34' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29533 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 13.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 60.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 905.38 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 285.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits :) Spent 1.093527 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/d_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits


fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.79962366 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 Second-epoch image center 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0928 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 Second-epoch image center 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 Second-epoch second image center 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00647 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1DZrm2fGOn Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6IIeJ0KXb2 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wDdjvauXof Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bz6EATErie Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0210 to 95.6707 deg, Dec +55.2642 to +67.4910 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0210 to 95.6707 deg, Dec 55.2642 to 67.4910 deg Loaded 14050 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8127 out of 8888 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8888 out of 18409 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0210 to 95.6707 deg, Dec +55.2642 to +67.4910 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0210 to 95.6707 deg, Dec 55.2642 to 67.4910 deg Loaded 14050 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8127 out of 8888 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8888 out of 18409 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=6.0) Read 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 57.0213 to 95.6704 deg, Dec +55.2642 to +67.5028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 57.0213 to 95.6704 deg, Dec 55.2642 to 67.5028 deg Loaded 14060 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8137 out of 8891 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8891 out of 18487 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 2.0 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 2.2 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 15.5 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.1DZrm2fGOn (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1604, bad_region=0, passed=18409 Got 18409 stars (including 16782 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18409 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18409 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18409 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18409 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5372) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1217 n_q2=1178 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.307 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.6IIeJ0KXb2 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1596, bad_region=0, passed=18487 Got 18487 stars (including 16865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18487 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 4887 stars left (next iteration limit 5376) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=4887 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.270 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1261 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.271 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.wDdjvauXof (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=431, bad_region=0, passed=4256 Got 4256 stars (including 3821 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4256 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3729 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3711 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4256 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3725 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4256 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4256 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 3709 stars left (next iteration limit 4082) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3709 robust_rms=12.336 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.668 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3709 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.493 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3709 robust_rms=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.388 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3709 robust_rms_before=0.997 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.355 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.348 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.380 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.388 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.380 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=3709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.357 n_q1=953 n_q2=908 n_q3=929 n_q4=919 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.bz6EATErie (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=4210 Got 4210 stars (including 3773 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4210 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3684 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3669 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3668 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3683 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3667 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4210 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 3667 stars left (next iteration limit 4034) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=12.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.719 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=0.443 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.467 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3667 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3667 robust_rms_before=0.983 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.358 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.385 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.385 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=3667 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.336 n_q1=942 n_q2=904 n_q3=917 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.142 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.307 ref2=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.271 new1=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits sigma_overall=0.369 worst_q_ratio=1.084 new2=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.142 reference average sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.289 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172_astrometric_residuals.png (4887 matched stars from wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214_astrometric_residuals.png (3709 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215_astrometric_residuals.png (3667 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21328_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 21328_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    10.85    04:40:17.04 +66:08:05.8   2887 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:40:17.03 +66:08:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 Second-epoch image center 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0928 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Image size: 942.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:08:28.129 +61:59:49.31 Second-epoch image center 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0972 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:09:14.588 +62:00:57.01 Second-epoch second image center 05:09:17.228 +62:00:42.97 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00647 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Fk1J8A2xMz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LmskuVzU9V Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fNikh5x8Cu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pm8pXWsSUQ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits and wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9449 to 95.6878 deg, Dec +55.1944 to +67.5009 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9449 to 95.6878 deg, Dec 55.1944 to 67.5009 deg Loaded 14168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6814 out of 8995 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8995 out of 131449 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815000 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815000 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.62
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) Read 131449 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9449 to 95.6878 deg, Dec +55.1944 to +67.5009 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9449 to 95.6878 deg, Dec 55.1944 to 67.5009 deg Loaded 14168 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6814 out of 8995 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 8995 out of 131449 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (aperture=4.5) Read 130560 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 56.9451 to 95.7119 deg, Dec +55.1941 to +67.5039 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 56.9451 to 95.7119 deg, Dec 55.1941 to 67.5039 deg Loaded 14179 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6852 out of 9001 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 9001 out of 130560 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (aperture=4.6) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 70 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 1.9 pix Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 15.6 mag. Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Fk1J8A2xMz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=12667, bad_region=6, passed=131418 Got 131418 stars (including 118525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 131418 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131418 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131418 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 131418 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5384) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1174 n_q2=1193 n_q3=1251 n_q4=1277 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.LmskuVzU9V (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=12449, bad_region=5, passed=130527 Got 130527 stars (including 117842 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 130527 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4899 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 725 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4899 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 130527 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 4899 stars left (next iteration limit 5388) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits N_match=4899 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.266 n_q1=1189 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1244 n_q4=1275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.302 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits -region wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.fNikh5x8Cu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1210, bad_region=0, passed=36690 Got 36690 stars (including 35428 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36690 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4881 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4881 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36690 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5369) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=11.085 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.626 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.453 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.483 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.386 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.982 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.350 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.347 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.377 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.386 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.377 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.339 n_q1=1377 n_q2=1068 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1176 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry ############ /tmp/tmp.pm8pXWsSUQ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1256, bad_region=0, passed=37038 Got 37038 stars (including 35718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37038 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37038 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 728 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37038 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37038 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=11.060 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.510 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.458 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.378 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=0.966 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.378 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1386 n_q2=1083 n_q3=1253 n_q4=1158 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.099 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/wcs_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:50:30.71 +59:43:04.5: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 06:11:15.37 +60:28:34.6: 11.94 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:42:40.56 +58:26:17.6: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:07:27.06 +62:19:46.0: 12.74 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 06:11:15.37 +60:28:34.6: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:42:40.56 +58:26:17.6: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.91 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:15.37 +60:28:34.6: ref_mag=11.91 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1505 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:50:30.71 +59:43:04.5: 12.13 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:40.56 +58:26:17.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7086 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:30.71 +59:43:04.5: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2208 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:17:37.29 +60:10:16.2: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:18:56.78 +59:46:07.2: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:07:27.06 +62:19:46.0: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:07:27.06 +62:19:46.0: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8886 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:17:37.29 +60:10:16.2: 12.73 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:37.29 +60:10:16.2: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7320 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:18:56.78 +59:46:07.2: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:18:56.78 +59:46:07.2: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8751 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:49:57.96 +66:32:51.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 05:13:43.76 +64:58:04.9: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:37:48.87 +59:19:41.4: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:39:14.32 +57:55:13.7: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:49:57.96 +66:32:51.3: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:57.96 +66:32:51.3: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8485 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 05:13:43.76 +64:58:04.9: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:43.76 +64:58:04.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8888 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:37:48.87 +59:19:41.4: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:48.87 +59:19:41.4: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0142 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0171.fits at 04:19:07.77 +60:59:29.3: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:39:14.32 +57:55:13.7: 13.08 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:14.32 +57:55:13.7: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.3085 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-44-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0172.fits at 04:19:07.77 +60:59:29.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:19:07.77 +60:59:29.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3732 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152305_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152305_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.80    05:14:58.23 +63:06:53.0   5140 3882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:14:58.39 +63:06:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152306_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152306_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.55    04:39:47.71 +59:25:05.0   2610 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:39:47.80 +59:25:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152315_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152315_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.83    05:48:36.36 +63:43:37.3   7335 4567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:48:36.45 +63:43:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152317_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152317_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.94    05:46:55.74 +58:48:26.9   7810 1628   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:46:55.80 +58:48:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152319_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152319_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.67    06:03:21.66 +59:35:24.3   8952 2375   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 06:03:21.75 +59:35:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152486_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152486_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    10.56    04:04:11.31 +61:32:04.1   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152584_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152584_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.03    04:40:16.96 +66:08:06.7   2887 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:40:16.97 +66:08:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152585_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152585_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    10.93    04:54:06.52 +63:53:01.0   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152688_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152688_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.23    05:06:21.17 +58:57:52.5   4658 1351   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:06:21.16 +58:57:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152697_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152697_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.21    05:15:22.93 +58:56:50.9   5358 1382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152793_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152793_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.50    04:44:15.54 +64:19:15.5   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152870_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152870_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.68    05:56:44.54 +58:42:07.6   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152936_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152936_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.83    05:18:46.78 +65:53:03.1   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 152958_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 152958_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.95    04:53:28.71 +61:27:00.1   3671 2832   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:53:28.67 +61:27:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153037_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.24    04:32:59.23 +58:18:19.5   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153065_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153065_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.05    05:20:02.62 +65:37:41.8   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153109_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.09    05:50:30.85 +64:55:01.4   7310 5299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:50:30.90 +64:55:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153134_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153134_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.14    05:01:23.77 +59:47:38.8   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153174_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153174_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.14    05:57:46.73 +66:05:16.3   7599 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:57:46.60 +66:05:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153262_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153262_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.17    06:11:15.40 +60:28:36.3   9391 3055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.13    06:11:15.34 +60:28:32.8   9388 3055   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153302_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153302_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.25    05:50:30.69 +59:43:04.5   7973 2222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.19    05:50:30.72 +59:43:04.6   7970 2224   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153425_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.57    04:35:34.88 +59:25:02.7   2286 1661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:35:34.85 +59:25:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153439_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153439_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.64    04:21:57.97 +60:45:35.8   1344 2572   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:21:58.02 +60:45:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153487_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153487_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.60    05:43:47.68 +66:36:43.0   6699 6222   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:43:47.55 +66:36:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153491_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153491_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.67    05:03:07.96 +66:49:07.8   4271 6078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:03:07.92 +66:49:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153494_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153494_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.61    05:06:32.70 +61:08:19.5   4618 2661   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:06:32.65 +61:08:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153525_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153525_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.71    04:42:40.65 +58:26:17.2   2804 1033   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.71    04:42:40.47 +58:26:17.9   2801 1036   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153534_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.11    04:14:51.56 +57:27:50.2   0499 0660   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:14:51.58 +57:27:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153546_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153546_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.72    05:13:17.20 +62:42:03.3   5042 3626   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:13:17.18 +62:42:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153558_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153558_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.64    05:25:48.90 +61:14:09.8   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153566_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153566_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.76    05:51:12.39 +58:26:21.5   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153574_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153574_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.66    04:50:06.05 +66:30:53.5   3492 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:50:06.11 +66:30:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153594_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153594_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.59    05:03:11.66 +60:28:13.8   4386 2250   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:03:11.62 +60:28:13.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153601_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153601_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.72    05:20:35.65 +62:38:12.4   5548 3629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:20:35.52 +62:38:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153609_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153609_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.65    04:53:50.75 +66:22:13.0   3717 5801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:53:50.71 +66:22:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153642_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153642_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.87    04:07:27.08 +62:19:45.7   0453 3673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.92    04:07:27.04 +62:19:46.3   0449 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153703_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153703_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.73    05:17:37.26 +60:10:15.7   5472 2129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.74    05:17:37.31 +60:10:16.7   5469 2132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153706_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153706_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.10    05:19:39.92 +58:06:53.0   5736 0908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:19:39.97 +58:06:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153736_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153736_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.94    04:08:02.11 +62:21:07.9   0493 3682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:08:02.14 +62:21:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153765_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153765_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.85    05:18:56.72 +59:46:07.1   5593 1896   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.91    05:18:56.83 +59:46:07.2   5590 1898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153778_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153778_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.72    05:57:29.38 +57:35:33.8   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153779_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153779_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.13    04:24:21.81 +56:51:53.2   1231 0196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:24:21.77 +56:51:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153818_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153818_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.97    04:54:09.49 +66:19:06.1   3736 5769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:54:09.72 +66:19:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153855_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153855_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.77    05:41:13.89 +58:04:57.8   7447 1114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:41:13.85 +58:04:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153876_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153876_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.94    05:20:30.66 +59:25:59.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153878_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153878_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.94    04:49:57.85 +66:32:51.9   3487 5910   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.78    04:49:58.08 +66:32:50.8   3485 5913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153880_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153880_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    12.92    05:13:43.81 +64:58:05.4   4981 4989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.87    05:13:43.71 +64:58:04.4   4978 4991   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 153961_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 153961_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.13    05:45:23.72 +56:58:16.4   7906 0508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:45:23.79 +56:58:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154025_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154025_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    13.09    04:37:48.74 +59:19:41.3   2457 1592   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.95    04:37:49.00 +59:19:41.5   2454 1595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154140_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154140_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    13.21    04:39:14.50 +57:55:14.2   2512 0734   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.48    04:39:14.14 +57:55:13.2   2508 0736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154156_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154156_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.37    05:14:52.34 +63:07:14.5   5133 3886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:14:52.41 +63:07:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154196_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154196_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.29    05:05:12.38 +64:37:26.0   4444 4754   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:05:12.30 +64:37:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154234_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154234_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.14    06:12:21.88 +61:35:54.8   9268 3733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154241_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.09    06:04:39.91 +59:12:27.0   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154260_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154260_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.34    05:01:49.58 +58:50:42.0   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154271_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154271_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.46    04:44:20.77 +60:48:26.2   2996 2461   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:44:20.91 +60:48:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154343_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154343_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 28.29962    2461280.79962    13.40    04:19:07.81 +60:59:28.1   1158 2735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-11-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0214.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.35    04:19:07.73 +60:59:30.4   1154 2739   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154352_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154352_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.44    04:15:37.57 +56:35:24.7   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154361_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154361_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.61    04:32:26.81 +63:39:49.6   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154364_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154364_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.15    05:47:06.22 +58:58:38.7   7803 1731   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:47:06.14 +58:58:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154393_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154393_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.28    04:59:01.96 +63:23:25.4   4055 4001   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:59:01.79 +63:23:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154406_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154406_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.40    05:10:18.97 +59:11:37.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154421_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154421_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.29    05:42:31.84 +61:17:09.3   7200 3039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:42:31.95 +61:17:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154434_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154434_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.37    05:12:03.38 +61:28:42.8   5004 2886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 05:12:03.42 +61:28:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154435_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154435_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.57    04:53:32.71 +61:26:26.6   3676 2826   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:53:32.64 +61:26:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 154537_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 154537_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.24    04:38:15.77 +63:22:47.8   2653 4034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 43617_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.30    04:14:55.88 +58:31:15.4   0608 1298   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:14:55.82 +58:31:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 81854_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    11.59    04:35:17.68 +62:16:23.9   2400 3383   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:35:17.70 +62:16:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 19139_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    12.44    04:36:33.72 +57:24:05.8   2269 0434   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:36:33.75 +57:24:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66919_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 The candidate 66919_fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 28.30024    2461280.80024    13.49    04:36:51.09 +61:08:52.4   2460 2697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-28_CI_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_021328_TTUQ1b1x1_2456301_WFK6SaER/fd_Cam-09-Q1b1x1_2026-08-28_02-12-10_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0215.fits **** FOUND 04:36:51.20 +61:08:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-09-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.79962366 -observatory V36 10:30:47.50 +11:12:18.4 Mercury (-1.9mag) 13:08:28.31 -10:26:04.4 Venus (-4.6mag) 06:46:33.17 +23:29:03.8 Mars (1.3mag) 09:00:38.54 +17:32:24.6 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:53:48.83 +02:53:47.5 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:23.08 +21:01:12.6 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:14:38.84 +00:02:54.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:26:20.70 -23:37:01.0 Pluto (14.5mag) 22:30:19.82 -09:20:38.2 Moon (-12.7mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 28 02:17 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.79962366: 09:00:33.89 +17:32:47.8 Io (6.2mag) 09:00:30.01 +17:33:06.0 Europa (6.3mag) 09:00:42.05 +17:32:11.0 Ganymede (5.7mag) 09:01:07.04 +17:30:12.0 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:58:10.32 +17:43:51.7 Himalia (15.7mag) 09:00:41.11 +17:32:13.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:57:50.44 +17:38:48.7 Elara (17.7mag) 09:04:42.83 +17:03:21.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 09:02:26.58 +17:47:30.6 Carme (19.0mag) 00:53:41.16 +02:53:20.9 Titan (8.4mag) 00:53:44.92 +02:53:53.9 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:54:22.84 +02:56:15.9 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:53:33.39 +02:53:52.6 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:52:46.61 +02:44:32.6 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 28 02:17 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.79962366: 20:50:17.02 -08:58:47.4 JWST 18:41:04.01 +15:46:01.8 Chandra 10:36:37.31 -58:10:49.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 28 02:17 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.79962366 -observatory V36 03:33:22.75 +18:48:47.6 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 18:00:24.94 -34:23:07.9 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:11:31.95 -69:46:33.7 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:14:15.27 +33:26:57.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:34:00.17 +43:44:41.4 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:21:42.20 +29:47:53.2 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 07:02:06.66 +26:10:10.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:40:14.23 +27:36:28.3 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:42:12.96 +05:16:50.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 20:47:19.68 +63:02:15.0 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:33:15.19 -14:45:55.8 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:29:09.47 +32:19:11.4 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:46.22 +15:26:23.4 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:41:12.42 +43:26:53.4 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:40:29.50 +49:39:14.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:29:43.54 -12:55:29.2 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:07:33.50 +20:29:29.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 11:02:16.05 +19:31:40.4 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:11:44.85 +00:54:16.5 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:19:26.99 +75:31:17.4 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:14.21 +46:19:42.8 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 12:04:08.65 +10:26:55.5 17.5mag A/2026 E1 22:17:37.81 -33:42:34.6 7.3mag 10P/Tempel 11:41:33.65 -04:44:11.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:48:25.14 -01:53:58.0 17.5mag 63P/Wild 00:49:29.28 -06:26:39.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:19:16.95 +19:55:38.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:21:40.25 -25:29:20.6 17.3mag 84P/Giclas 03:14:56.31 +14:46:08.1 17.0mag 88P/Howell 08:44:04.50 +24:38:02.4 16.5mag 93P/Lovas 05:05:55.27 +24:45:01.3 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 07:01:19.52 +27:08:26.9 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 10:05:18.42 +22:55:43.7 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:25:00.42 -17:46:53.1 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos 06:04:44.75 +20:54:30.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 07:01:15.50 +17:41:56.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 23:57:12.97 +02:52:09.0 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:00:06.68 -18:21:58.8 12.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:22:29.47 +38:01:34.2 16.2mag 162P/Siding Spring 10:14:47.87 +22:20:26.5 12.5mag 169P/NEAT 03:14:02.94 +09:08:37.3 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 04:20:17.55 +32:59:24.2 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 08:04:18.34 +36:38:42.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:19:15.52 +00:52:51.1 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:19:01.35 +17:21:49.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Aug 28 02:17 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90 AT2026zjy 2026-08-23.03 15.91 03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50 SN2026ymb 2026-08-23.4 16.44 20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30 SN2026yid 2026-08-22.82 15.13 04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60 ASASSN-26ey 2026-08-20.02 15.55 16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80 ASASSN-26ex 2026-08-18.78 3.63 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.59 15.39 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24 8.41 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 28 02:17 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag 19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2 PNV J19450648+1822422 2026-08-25.1278 9.0mag 00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3 PNV J00425465+4122593 2026-08-25.4712 18.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 28 02:17 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 23:24:16.986 -39:54:38.19 AT 2026xsr 2026-08-01.59 19.34 14:05:54.276 -15:52:29.96 AT 2026xsq 2026-02-17.61 20.88 16:00:02.823 +12:57:02.46 AT 2026xsp 2026-02-13.59 21.18 13:18:25.859 +25:17:53.19 AT 2026xso 2026-02-17.52 21.43 14:46:41.619 +11:38:04.02 AT 2026xsn 2026-02-17.55 20.37 14:12:17.965 +35:36:02.21 AT 2026xsm 2026-02-17.60 20.93 00:28:22.210 -09:16:55.88 AT 2026xsl 2026-08-06.67 20.38 13:40:02.666 +27:45:49.66 AT 2026xsk 2026-02-17.50 21.05 13:18:58.760 +35:13:29.33 AT 2026xsj 2026-02-17.49 21.16 14:58:55.200 +08:49:53.06 AT 2026xsi 2026-02-13.58 21.13 12:22:18.795 +12:08:10.55 AT 2026xsh 2026-02-16.62 20.67 11:46:22.552 +13:15:39.41 AT 2026xsg 2026-02-16.57 20.7 08:55:07.272 +15:47:59.14 AT 2026xsf 2026-02-13.30 20.98 07:34:01.728 +10:29:15.79 AT 2026xse 2026-02-14.26 20.11 07:29:49.030 +19:09:23.06 AT 2026xsd 2026-02-13.26 20.62 07:42:52.595 +22:58:08.19 AT 2026xsc 2026-02-13.26 20.93 04:42:06.854 +06:56:13.00 AT 2026xsb 2026-02-06.24 21.16 05:10:23.116 -06:04:42.26 AT 2026xsa 2026-02-05.30 20.59 05:17:11.087 -07:32:29.20 AT 2026xrz 2026-02-02.30 20.34 08:18:15.789 -07:48:37.88 AT 2026xry 2026-01-28.38 20.53 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 28 02:17 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C