FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last  image: 2461280.69682271 28.08.2026 04:43:15.482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  7232
Objects passed selection criteria:  7211
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.9    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5368.25
Average stars matched: 5215 (97.1453 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   233268 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Fri Aug 28 00:52:37 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
First image: 2461093.77304396 22.02.2026 06:33:00.998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Last  image: 2461280.69682271 28.08.2026 04:43:15.482   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 117
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  36191
Objects passed selection criteria:  36088
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    3.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28848.2
Average stars matched: 27762.5 (96.2363 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   260484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Fri Aug 28 00:53:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-04-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-04-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 346220 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 346220 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits


renamed 'UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits_preview.png'

UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 482.7200
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 528.8252
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1413.7747
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 446.1070
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1417.8436
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 443.3058
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.92877
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.006
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-27T23:42:29.5620593' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T04:42:29.5620593' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61280.1961754863 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T04:42:39.4669695' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61280.1962901158 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.995830626363 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     62.0000218464951 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.4122222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     336.321388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.71385219773252 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29497 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29497 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 24.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 12.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =               5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits :)

Spent 0.908848 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-27T23:43:15.4821592' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-28T04:43:15.4821592' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61280.1967069674 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-28T04:43:25.3868222' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61280.1968215974 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.995830651143 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     62.0000218850975 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.3480555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     336.387777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.72857111855733 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-04'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+62 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29497 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29497 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 13.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 51.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 24.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             5.800464 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :)

Spent 0.897643 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/d_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits



fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461280.69629123
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.4'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.4'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00545 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7F6Yu58R2b
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WqlaJ9PAv0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jSAUQOF3PQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QEFVxTa1Z9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.896950
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.896950
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.51
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.39

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.2640 to +67.4533 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.2640 to 67.4533 deg
Loaded 6574 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3976 out of 4190 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4190 out of 7332 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec +55.3313 to +67.4947 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9723 to 198.4317 deg, Dec 55.3313 to 67.4947 deg
Loaded 6542 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3979 out of 4176 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4176 out of 7282 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
 2.3 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 15.4 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.2 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.7F6Yu58R2b (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=506, bad_region=0, passed=7332
Got 7332 stars (including 6822 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7332 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7332 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1138 n_q2=1153 n_q3=1306 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.205
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WqlaJ9PAv0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, bad_region=0, passed=7282
Got 7282 stars (including 6779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4913 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7282 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.343 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1305 n_q4=1295 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.252
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.jSAUQOF3PQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=178, bad_region=0, passed=3498
Got 3498 stars (including 3316 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3498 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3250 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3244 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3244 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3244 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3249 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3243 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3498 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 3243 stars left (next iteration limit 3568)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3243 robust_rms=10.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.540 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3243 robust_rms=0.620 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.928 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3243 robust_rms=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.615 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3243 robust_rms_before=1.340 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.392 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.503 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.615
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.503 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=3243 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.511 n_q1=869 n_q2=860 n_q3=822 n_q4=692 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QEFVxTa1Z9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=184, bad_region=0, passed=3462
Got 3462 stars (including 3275 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3462 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3211 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3204 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3205 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3204 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3210 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3203 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3203 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3462 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 3203 stars left (next iteration limit 3524)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3203 robust_rms=10.612 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.352 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3203 robust_rms=0.597 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.204 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3203 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3203 robust_rms_before=1.365 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.393 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.520 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.587
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.520 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=3203 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.525 n_q1=875 n_q2=831 n_q3=821 n_q4=676 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.293
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.205
ref2=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.252
new1=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits sigma_overall=0.391 worst_q_ratio=1.308
new2=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.293
reference average sigma_overall=0.3745 worst_q_ratio=1.2285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066_astrometric_residuals.png (3243 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3203 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.4'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0456 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Image size: 942.2'x627.4'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:03.636 +62:00:23.32
Second-epoch image center 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0510 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  11:59:46.379 +61:58:32.78
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:44.049 +61:58:22.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00545 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits &> /tmp/tmp.r5iHuI8jyu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xbtcAnTFvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WARLSML1aS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h0OQOvF5NO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits and wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.792800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.792800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.52

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 37333 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec +55.2253 to +67.4860 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9729 to 198.6786 deg, Dec 55.2253 to 67.4860 deg
Loaded 6642 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4194 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4194 out of 37333 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 37494 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec +55.2649 to +67.4946 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 159.9724 to 198.6777 deg, Dec 55.2649 to 67.4946 deg
Loaded 6625 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3749 out of 4189 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4189 out of 37494 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 106 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  13.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.r5iHuI8jyu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1765, bad_region=9, passed=37315
Got 37315 stars (including 35474 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37315 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4909 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.2 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4912 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4909 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37315 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4909 stars left (next iteration limit 5399)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits N_match=4909 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1318 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.xbtcAnTFvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=1739, bad_region=9, passed=37476
Got 37476 stars (including 35663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 726 to 789 (Dec 55.3 to 67.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1133 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1311 n_q4=1298 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits -region wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.WARLSML1aS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=487, bad_region=22, passed=20680
Got 20680 stars (including 20135 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=9.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.634 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.610 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.911 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.610 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.331 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.519 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.610
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.519 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.536 n_q1=1413 n_q2=1297 n_q3=1234 n_q4=944 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.351
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.h0OQOvF5NO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=481, bad_region=25, passed=20741
Got 20741 stars (including 20211 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20741 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 727 to 788 (Dec 55.6 to 67.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=9.213 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.207 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.580 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.180 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.594 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=1.362 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.449 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.511 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.594
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.511 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.510 n_q1=1424 n_q2=1278 n_q3=1229 n_q4=955 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/wcs_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:18:06.00 +60:45:32.7:  13.34 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:18:06.00 +60:45:32.7:  13.30 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:18:06.00 +60:45:32.7: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8073 delta=-0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:31:12.40 +66:18:18.4:  13.10 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:35:53.49 +61:33:07.8:  13.32 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:31:12.40 +66:18:18.4:  13.13 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.12 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:31:12.40 +66:18:18.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0970 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:35:53.49 +61:33:07.8:  13.32 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:35:53.49 +61:33:07.8: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2591 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 12:45:44.43 +61:47:31.5:  14.01 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 12:45:44.43 +61:47:31.5:  13.96 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.99 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:45:44.43 +61:47:31.5: ref_mag=13.99 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8040 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-33-00_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0278.fits at 11:56:12.86 +61:00:05.3:  13.89 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-34-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0279.fits at 11:56:12.86 +61:00:05.3:  13.91 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:56:12.86 +61:00:05.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9053 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52572_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52572_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.37    12:09:30.26 +64:19:04.2   4243 1736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:09:30.11 +64:19:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52573_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52573_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 28.19629    2461280.69629    13.81    12:18:05.92 +60:45:32.9   3403 3796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.80    12:18:06.09 +60:45:32.6   3400 3794   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52574_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52574_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.74    12:18:38.52 +63:15:52.3   3565 2295   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:18:38.46 +63:15:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52656_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    10.36    13:02:38.74 +60:29:18.7   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52672_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    10.37    12:12:55.57 +59:59:41.1   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52689_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    10.65    11:52:35.92 +65:01:36.3   5358 1382   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52730_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.05    12:09:03.69 +64:09:05.6   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52743_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.06    12:20:49.49 +59:23:59.1   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52753_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    10.94    11:52:03.15 +58:04:02.8   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52757_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52757_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.21    11:58:46.97 +64:47:42.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52850_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52850_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.90    12:45:08.49 +64:53:24.1   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52854_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.58    12:15:42.39 +57:00:11.0   3290 6068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:42.40 +57:00:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52886_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52886_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.01    12:02:53.38 +67:04:27.3   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52958_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.25    12:20:42.94 +65:47:24.3   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52961_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 52961_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.88    11:22:48.65 +61:43:34.9   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53003_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.92    12:00:56.39 +56:53:22.9   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53062_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.36    11:45:01.43 +64:47:36.5   5839 1531   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:45:01.42 +64:47:36.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53097_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.31    10:58:30.33 +65:05:12.1   8801 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53138_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53138_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.41    11:42:29.10 +62:38:04.6   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53167_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53167_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.23    11:01:49.90 +59:34:58.2   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53174_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53174_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.73    12:18:29.86 +65:10:29.8   3730 1155   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.77    12:54:55.90 +62:02:04.1   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53192_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53192_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.44    12:15:28.46 +56:59:08.2   3308 6081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:15:28.46 +56:59:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53208_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53208_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.29    11:00:21.95 +59:16:06.0   9264 4581   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.99    12:49:35.26 +64:43:51.9   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53252_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.13    12:47:08.25 +57:17:38.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53263_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53263_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.47    10:56:47.39 +63:13:16.2   9112 2176   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53268_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53268_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.15    13:01:58.01 +64:23:27.6   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53281_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53281_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.68    11:03:22.37 +64:06:08.7   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53292_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.72    11:08:43.47 +64:36:38.3   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53304_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53304_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.47    10:58:27.03 +60:38:45.8   9268 3733   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53306_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53306_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.60    11:04:04.10 +61:47:50.9   8746 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:04:04.21 +61:47:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53316_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53316_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.90    12:55:23.07 +58:38:50.2   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53318_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53318_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.26    13:03:30.88 +65:42:17.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53319_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.05    12:31:59.07 +59:44:42.0   2275 4236   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53353_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53353_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.82    12:13:52.69 +57:09:45.5   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53370_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.12    12:38:52.81 +61:45:55.5   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53386_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53386_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.86    12:10:56.72 +58:52:35.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53396_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53396_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.93    12:55:29.37 +58:09:30.0   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53409_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.30    12:57:52.20 +59:47:22.1   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53413_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53413_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 28.19629    2461280.69629    13.06    11:31:12.40 +66:18:17.7   6687 0596   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.15    11:31:12.40 +66:18:19.2   6684 0594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53417_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.15    12:58:11.51 +58:54:36.5   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53418_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53418_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.43    12:27:57.94 +65:43:12.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53453_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53453_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.33    12:47:39.66 +61:44:18.9   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53457_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.54    13:05:06.46 +62:16:08.0   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53458_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53458_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.20    12:29:45.49 +58:23:50.1   2296 5068   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:29:45.49 +58:23:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53460_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53460_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.87    11:40:23.19 +57:57:10.2   6181 5647   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:40:23.22 +57:57:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53467_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53467_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.27    12:54:49.34 +60:43:44.5   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53474_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53474_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.49    12:43:29.33 +65:57:24.5   2278 0399   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:43:29.22 +65:57:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53481_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53481_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.30    12:53:39.90 +62:30:15.3   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53493_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53493_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.79    10:59:41.19 +61:04:15.5   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53506_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53506_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.74    13:00:41.63 +63:53:58.5   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53522_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53522_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 28.19629    2461280.69629    13.38    12:35:53.56 +61:33:07.7   2205 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.18    12:35:53.42 +61:33:07.9   2203 3111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53551_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53551_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.90    11:07:13.82 +56:52:34.0   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53554_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53554_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.32    12:49:10.04 +60:31:47.7   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53558_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53558_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.50    12:50:42.23 +62:58:08.4   1379 2039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:50:42.33 +62:58:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53568_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53568_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.30    11:42:45.21 +66:45:13.4   5983 0344   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:42:45.40 +66:45:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53643_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53643_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    12.89    10:56:27.58 +62:59:16.5   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53649_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.60    12:49:36.98 +65:59:13.1   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53679_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.60    11:58:21.10 +61:26:10.4   4867 3522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:58:21.13 +61:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53688_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53688_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.40    12:17:59.63 +57:41:10.4   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53697_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53697_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.36    13:01:34.09 +60:26:18.2   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53706_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53706_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.60    11:48:47.15 +64:36:31.8   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53733_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.13    13:02:47.32 +63:43:52.8   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53759_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53759_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.52    12:33:39.86 +57:23:19.2   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53777_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.61    12:37:06.32 +57:06:42.2   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53790_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53790_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.33    10:59:39.27 +61:19:47.8   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53810_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53810_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 28.19629    2461280.69629    13.80    12:45:44.39 +61:47:31.9   1545 2818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.80    12:45:44.48 +61:47:31.1   1542 2816   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53813_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53813_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.77    13:07:39.21 +62:27:21.7   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53816_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53816_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.68    12:36:30.76 +58:29:07.2   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53840_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53840_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.77    12:08:26.72 +65:20:01.8   4371 1133   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:08:26.78 +65:20:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53847_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.92    13:08:46.52 +63:34:22.1   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53879_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53879_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.35    11:52:54.89 +60:20:33.7   5233 4196   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:52:54.80 +60:20:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53893_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53893_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.76    11:30:51.65 +62:50:24.1   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53900_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53900_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.53    11:47:54.79 +66:52:07.5   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53918_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53918_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.84    12:18:42.97 +60:57:02.6   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53925_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53925_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.62    11:16:23.41 +64:18:12.2   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53934_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53934_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.45    11:11:12.27 +64:14:58.3   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53967_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53967_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.91    11:21:56.44 +65:17:07.5   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53969_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53969_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.76    11:06:23.50 +65:02:48.4   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53973_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53973_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.88    12:49:13.67 +58:40:02.1   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53991_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53991_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.17    12:36:01.27 +60:36:48.8   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53995_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 53995_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.98    12:22:12.73 +66:39:20.2   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54012_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54012_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.20    11:01:41.25 +60:05:53.2   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54020_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54020_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.72    11:20:51.05 +64:15:36.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54025_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54025_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.10    11:46:29.89 +61:30:36.5   5719 3505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  11:46:29.98 +61:30:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54065_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.00    11:14:55.24 +60:23:46.4   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54066_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54066_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 28.19629    2461280.69629    13.91    11:56:12.79 +61:00:06.7   5010 3793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-42-29_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0066.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.90    11:56:12.93 +61:00:03.9   5008 3791   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54067_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54067_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.66    11:12:39.11 +60:23:12.8   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54069_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54069_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.38    11:13:54.34 +60:00:42.8   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54073_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54073_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.13    12:24:39.58 +62:30:24.5   3089 2686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:24:39.68 +62:30:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54082_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54082_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.93    11:13:20.37 +60:32:25.4   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54097_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54097_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.35    12:54:15.28 +62:38:15.6   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54129_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54129_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.57    11:44:11.75 +59:16:28.8   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54141_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54141_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.18    12:33:38.93 +64:05:21.7   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54142_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.82    11:16:56.67 +57:07:45.6   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54144_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54144_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.28    13:01:05.52 +65:19:50.6   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54145_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54145_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.28    11:14:37.46 +65:36:11.6   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54146_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54146_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.36    11:15:06.51 +57:26:28.4   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54154_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54154_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.37    12:45:20.92 +60:19:16.8   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54160_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54160_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    13.96    11:39:38.88 +57:04:26.3   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54175_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54175_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.35    12:13:20.41 +62:46:02.0   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54183_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54183_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.34    12:08:13.42 +63:45:36.1   4294 2079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:08:13.39 +63:45:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 54184_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    14.01    11:51:17.00 +59:06:42.5   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22561_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 22561_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    11.68    11:50:33.24 +66:54:24.7   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067
The candidate 07651_fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 28.19682    2461280.69682    7.69    12:36:23.33 +59:29:12.8   1913 4326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-27_CI_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_235641_TTUQ1b1x1_2203279_qYlvczhO/fd_UMa-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-27_23-43-15_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0067.fits

**** FOUND  12:36:23.30 +59:29:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-04-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.69629123 -observatory V36
10:30:01.62 +11:16:54.5 Mercury (-1.9mag)
13:08:09.58 -10:23:23.8 Venus (-4.6mag)
06:46:15.75 +23:29:16.7 Mars (1.3mag)
09:00:33.17 +17:32:46.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:53:49.99 +02:53:56.0 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:22.76 +21:01:11.7 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:39.36 +00:02:58.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:21.22 -23:36:59.2 Pluto (14.5mag)
22:27:27.54 -09:55:27.8 Moon (-12.7mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 28 00:52 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.69629123:
09:00:28.29 +17:33:10.2 Io (6.1mag)
09:00:24.48 +17:33:28.4 Europa (6.3mag)
09:00:35.27 +17:32:39.3 Ganymede (5.7mag)
09:01:01.42 +17:30:34.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:58:04.86 +17:44:09.8 Himalia (15.7mag)
09:00:37.62 +17:32:26.5 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:57:44.98 +17:39:07.6 Elara (17.7mag)
09:04:37.54 +17:03:45.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:02:21.65 +17:47:50.6 Carme (19.0mag)
00:53:41.87 +02:53:30.4 Titan (8.4mag)
00:53:46.80 +02:54:02.7 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:54:24.10 +02:56:23.9 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:53:34.67 +02:54:02.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:52:47.89 +02:44:41.9 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 28 00:52 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461280.69629123:
20:50:10.44 -09:04:44.6 JWST
18:34:21.65 +20:52:07.5 Chandra
09:39:48.41 -54:16:00.4 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 28 00:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461280.69629123 -observatory V36
03:33:17.74 +18:48:25.0 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:24.10 -34:23:14.6 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:11:26.75 -69:46:15.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:14:14.18 +33:26:48.1 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:33:47.37 +43:43:19.6 17.7mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:21:47.47 +29:48:31.6 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
07:02:01.33 +26:10:17.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:40:08.42 +27:36:43.3 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:42:08.87 +05:16:51.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
20:47:25.77 +63:03:23.4 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:33:18.15 -14:45:23.0 14.7mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:29:03.39 +32:18:51.4 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:45.98 +15:26:27.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:41:17.99 +43:26:59.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:40:38.79 +49:39:21.0 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:29:39.54 -12:55:26.6 15.2mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:07:30.55 +20:30:40.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
11:02:06.46 +19:32:08.0 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:11:40.15 +00:54:45.1 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:19:16.14 +75:32:09.8 16.3mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:15.46 +46:19:45.0 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:04:03.02 +10:26:23.7 17.5mag A/2026 E1
22:17:33.30 -33:41:19.4 7.3mag 10P/Tempel
11:41:29.57 -04:43:45.4 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:48:12.54 -01:51:58.1 17.5mag 63P/Wild
00:49:31.88 -06:26:17.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:19:04.02 +19:55:59.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:21:44.42 -25:28:53.2 17.3mag 84P/Giclas
03:14:53.82 +14:45:55.0 17.0mag 88P/Howell
08:43:50.51 +24:39:03.0 16.5mag 93P/Lovas
05:05:35.68 +24:42:34.0 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
07:01:00.03 +27:09:44.1 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
10:05:04.15 +22:56:58.2 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:24:47.17 -17:44:38.6 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
06:04:36.51 +20:54:38.8 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
07:01:05.88 +17:42:22.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:57:15.80 +02:52:25.2 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:00:18.80 -18:22:16.0 12.4mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:22:09.96 +38:01:43.3 16.2mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:15:24.81 +22:27:25.3 12.5mag 169P/NEAT
03:13:55.36 +09:08:55.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
04:19:59.86 +32:57:10.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
08:04:00.68 +36:39:13.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:19:12.13 +00:53:33.3 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:18:55.79 +17:22:08.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.2K Aug 28 00:52 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
04:20:07.58 -42:26:59.90  AT2026zjy  2026-08-23.03 15.91
03:08:18.02 +11:54:46.50  SN2026ymb  2026-08-23.4 16.44
20:22:32.48 -50:45:14.30  SN2026yid  2026-08-22.82 15.13
04:24:28.39 -56:20:21.60  ASASSN-26ey  2026-08-20.02 15.55
16:46:37.81 -63:14:59.80  ASASSN-26ex  2026-08-18.78 3.63
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.78 +32:04:21.30  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.59 15.39
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:32.95 -68:48:30.00  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24 8.41
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 28 00:52 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
00:42:54.65 +41:22:59.3  PNV J00425465+4122593  2026-08-25.4712  18.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 28 00:52 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
16:00:02.823 +12:57:02.46  AT 2026xsp  2026-02-13.59 21.18
13:18:25.859 +25:17:53.19  AT 2026xso  2026-02-17.52 21.43
14:46:41.619 +11:38:04.02  AT 2026xsn  2026-02-17.55 20.37
14:12:17.965 +35:36:02.21  AT 2026xsm  2026-02-17.60 20.93
00:28:22.210 -09:16:55.88  AT 2026xsl  2026-08-06.67 20.38
13:40:02.666 +27:45:49.66  AT 2026xsk  2026-02-17.50 21.05
13:18:58.760 +35:13:29.33  AT 2026xsj  2026-02-17.49 21.16
14:58:55.200 +08:49:53.06  AT 2026xsi  2026-02-13.58 21.13
12:22:18.795 +12:08:10.55  AT 2026xsh  2026-02-16.62 20.67
11:46:22.552 +13:15:39.41  AT 2026xsg  2026-02-16.57 20.7
08:55:07.272 +15:47:59.14  AT 2026xsf  2026-02-13.30 20.98
07:34:01.728 +10:29:15.79  AT 2026xse  2026-02-14.26 20.11
07:29:49.030 +19:09:23.06  AT 2026xsd  2026-02-13.26 20.62
07:42:52.595 +22:58:08.19  AT 2026xsc  2026-02-13.26 20.93
04:42:06.854 +06:56:13.00  AT 2026xsb  2026-02-06.24 21.16
05:10:23.116 -06:04:42.26  AT 2026xsa  2026-02-05.30 20.59
05:17:11.087 -07:32:29.20  AT 2026xrz  2026-02-02.30 20.34
08:18:15.789 -07:48:37.88  AT 2026xry  2026-01-28.38 20.53
10:52:02.742 +09:20:43.23  AT 2026xrx  2026-01-28.44 21.19
10:51:22.547 +09:35:56.77  AT 2026xrw  2026-01-28.44 20.5
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 88K Aug 28 00:52 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Fri Aug 28 00:52:06 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 36s (0.60 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 11s (0.18 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 60s (1.00 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 2 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 2 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 8 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 26s (0.43 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 23s (0.38 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 2s (0.03 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 4s (0.07 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 5s (0.08 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 60s (1.00 min)
FIELD_UMa-04-Q1b1x1: 142s (2.37 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 144s (2.40 min)
Finished: Fri Aug 28 00:54:30 CDT 2026