FITS images used in this processing run:

Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last  image: 2461277.95642490 25.08.2026 10:57:05.111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8015
Objects passed selection criteria:  7974
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5553.5
Average stars matched: 5434.25 (97.8527 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   234328 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 25 05:59:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last  image: 2461277.95642490 25.08.2026 10:57:05.111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 76
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  40317
Objects passed selection criteria:  40177
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    2.7    2.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 28671.5
Average stars matched: 27741.8 (96.7572 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   263148 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 25 05:59:53 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 123604 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 123604 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits_preview.png'

UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits


renamed 'UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits_preview.png'

UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 440.8971
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.6277
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1871.3793
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 527.9097
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1898.9824
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 547.8800
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.24448
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.036
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-25T05:56:16.5697658' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-25T10:56:16.5697658' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61277.4557473264 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-25T10:56:26.4814148' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61277.4558620485 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     148.234233793697 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9995897390159 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =               15.015 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     34.2538888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.80693058428005 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  6.9 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 34.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.51 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                183.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             9.400752 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits :)

Spent 0.492349 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-25T05:57:05.1116419' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-25T10:57:05.1116419' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61277.4563091551 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-25T10:57:15.0125878' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61277.4564237501 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     148.234233743476 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9995897805525 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     15.1127777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     34.3319444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     3.78357854341928 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'UMa-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 52 56'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29496 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 35.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               902.81 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.6 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                183.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=            18.401472 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =            13.701096 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits :)

Spent 0.483874 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/d_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits



fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.95586307
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0069 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mi6kDfDBID
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RYShniIUg2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nljfKvfSCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QnuWTX9eOM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.46

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.46

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3304 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3304 deg
Loaded 6199 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4177 out of 4398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4398 out of 8505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
 2.2 pix  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
 15.5 mag.  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
 13.5 mag.  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
 13.5 mag.  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.5 (SNR )  11.2 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.mi6kDfDBID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=8427
Got 8427 stars (including 7865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1117 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1122 n_q4=1342 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.RYShniIUg2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=8505
Got 8505 stars (including 7931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.nljfKvfSCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=139, bad_region=0, passed=2743
Got 2743 stars (including 2602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2743 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.5 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2557 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2553 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2551 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2553 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.5 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2558 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2554 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2554 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 2554 stars left (next iteration limit 2808)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2554 robust_rms=5.782 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.109 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2554 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.818 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2554 robust_rms=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.648 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2554 robust_rms_before=1.062 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.411 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.444 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.523 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.648
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits N_match=2554 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.568 n_q1=848 n_q2=248 n_q3=901 n_q4=557 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.379
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.QnuWTX9eOM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=130, bad_region=0, passed=2666
Got 2666 stars (including 2535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2666 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.5 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2490 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2485 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2486 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 692 to 748 (Dec 48.5 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2488 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2484 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2665 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 2484 stars left (next iteration limit 2734)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2484 robust_rms=5.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.829 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2484 robust_rms=0.514 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.792 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2484 robust_rms=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2484 robust_rms_before=1.052 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.400 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.478 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.526 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.658
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.526 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits N_match=2484 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.500 n_q1=828 n_q2=206 n_q3=900 n_q4=550 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.365
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.322
ref2=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.248
new1=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits sigma_overall=0.412 worst_q_ratio=1.379
new2=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits sigma_overall=0.394 worst_q_ratio=1.365
reference average sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342_astrometric_residuals.png (2554 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343_astrometric_residuals.png (2484 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0069 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0038 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  09:53:01.885 +53:58:59.65
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:00.700 +53:58:34.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00769 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZKJF1gQdGC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.glQSOBxq6i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wskfSJfFNt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KWgHrI4wmZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.812300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.812300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.61

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.61

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 43456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3417 deg
Loaded 6244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3916 out of 4420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4420 out of 43456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
 2.1 pix  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
 15.6 mag.  UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
 13.8 mag.  fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  13.8 (SNR )  13.4 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZKJF1gQdGC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2121, bad_region=10, passed=43375
Got 43375 stars (including 41171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1125 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.glQSOBxq6i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2172, bad_region=13, passed=43430
Got 43430 stars (including 41162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43430 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1334 n_q3=1128 n_q4=1344 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.wskfSJfFNt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=443, bad_region=19, passed=14496
Got 14496 stars (including 14010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14496 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14483 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=5.688 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.781 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.622 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4880 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.658 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4880 robust_rms_before=1.089 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.475 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.519 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.592 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.658
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.592 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.590 n_q1=1583 n_q2=454 n_q3=1756 n_q4=1087 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.KWgHrI4wmZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=452, bad_region=20, passed=14295
Got 14295 stars (including 13807 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.0 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14278 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44" 
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5371)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=5.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.590 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.783 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4883 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.689 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4883 robust_rms_before=1.084 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.473 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.644 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.689
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.644 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.608 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.572 n_q1=1599 n_q2=396 n_q3=1808 n_q4=1080 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.309
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:19:02.51 +55:07:37.5:  12.62 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:40.7:  13.00 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:53:33.34 +58:02:26.0:  12.97 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:19:02.51 +55:07:37.5:  12.61 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:19:02.51 +55:07:37.5: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6857 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:53:33.34 +58:02:26.0:  12.96 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:40.7:  13.01 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:53:33.34 +58:02:26.0: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8508 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:59:37.70 +56:47:40.7: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6846 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:29:44.61 +55:04:21.3:  13.58 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:29:44.61 +55:04:21.3:  13.59 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.59 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:29:44.61 +55:04:21.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2031 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:21.2:  13.23 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:21.2:  13.25 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:47:19.18 +51:10:21.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8207 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 52987_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 25.45586    2461277.95586    12.80    09:19:02.47 +55:07:37.4   1823 3893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.62    09:19:02.56 +55:07:37.6   1824 3897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 52993_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.27    09:00:43.19 +53:47:19.4   0124 3246   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52995_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 52995_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.35    09:41:07.81 +55:52:13.9   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53000_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.96    10:00:22.50 +57:51:06.7   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53002_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53002_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.84    09:53:48.86 +51:09:14.2   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53004_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53004_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.77    10:31:56.98 +50:46:02.4   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53009_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    10.98    10:27:27.76 +50:28:41.0   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53010_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.19    10:02:08.21 +51:23:44.7   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53015_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.63    10:01:21.86 +57:35:47.9   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53016_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.42    09:46:51.15 +50:48:51.5   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53017_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53017_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.73    09:14:05.87 +51:09:55.0   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53021_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53021_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.55    09:51:24.91 +48:52:15.9   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53023_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53023_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.82    09:08:12.44 +48:45:48.2   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53028_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.76    09:39:49.95 +50:00:57.3   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53029_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.99    09:51:22.51 +59:03:05.7   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53034_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.72    10:22:31.18 +53:41:35.3   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53043_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53043_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    11.90    10:06:17.59 +53:12:23.2   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53058_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.35    09:10:28.22 +52:43:28.9   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53068_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.67    09:01:21.62 +55:50:30.4   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53069_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.81    08:59:08.14 +57:42:44.4   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53074_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53074_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.63    08:59:53.02 +56:17:08.3   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53081_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.71    08:59:44.51 +55:27:23.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53082_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53082_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.36    09:29:07.24 +50:00:39.5   2604 0768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:07.19 +50:00:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53086_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.41    09:11:23.15 +50:14:37.3   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53087_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53087_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.42    09:42:10.18 +57:00:19.3   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53091_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.56    09:19:56.46 +50:22:57.7   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53092_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 25.45586    2461277.95586    12.61    09:59:37.70 +56:47:40.6   5239 4922   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.79    09:59:37.71 +56:47:40.8   5240 4927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53126_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53126_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 25.45586    2461277.95586    12.80    09:53:33.37 +58:02:25.7   4697 5639   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.92    09:53:33.31 +58:02:26.2   4698 5644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53128_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53128_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.86    09:07:20.85 +53:56:39.2   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53143_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.79    09:03:47.84 +50:53:01.3   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53144_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53144_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.84    09:15:09.46 +53:17:28.0   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53152_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53152_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.85    09:12:28.66 +52:20:13.6   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53171_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53171_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.66    09:13:33.92 +48:58:02.3   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53179_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53179_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.79    09:03:53.63 +52:02:55.5   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53187_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53187_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.78    09:02:28.65 +54:40:04.2   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53242_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53242_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.48    09:07:45.64 +58:37:25.9   1064 6098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53244_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53244_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.24    09:18:15.95 +57:57:32.8   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53249_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53249_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.06    09:36:47.60 +56:59:20.7   3360 4970   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

**** FOUND  09:36:47.47 +56:59:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53251_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53251_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.85    09:22:19.21 +49:11:08.7   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53252_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53252_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.02    09:01:23.79 +53:53:21.1   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53257_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53257_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.50    09:11:17.87 +54:22:25.9   1110 3496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53261_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53261_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.81    10:46:18.39 +57:40:39.4   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53301_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53301_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.36    09:37:36.45 +57:54:49.4   3426 5530   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

**** FOUND  09:37:36.65 +57:54:49.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53310_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53310_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.59    09:09:15.00 +50:49:02.9   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53321_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53321_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 25.45586    2461277.95586    13.29    09:29:44.70 +55:04:21.5   2748 3818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.14    09:29:44.52 +55:04:21.1   2749 3822   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53328_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53328_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.95    09:11:00.68 +50:45:02.9   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53330_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53330_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.39    09:29:59.30 +55:45:11.3   2781 4232   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

**** FOUND  09:29:59.24 +55:45:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53347_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53347_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.16    09:14:18.82 +58:06:03.9   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53354_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53354_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.73    09:04:25.44 +57:53:08.7   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53367_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53367_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.45    09:06:43.56 +56:07:09.4   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53370_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53370_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.35    09:17:43.00 +56:48:13.0   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53374_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53374_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.47    09:02:41.14 +51:45:18.0   0148 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53375_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53375_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.91    10:00:40.50 +51:18:07.9   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53381_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53381_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.21    10:37:24.96 +57:31:35.2   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53384_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53384_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.28    10:36:21.93 +57:54:03.6   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53388_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53388_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.59    09:23:00.17 +58:58:47.6   2283 6211   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53397_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53397_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.88    09:07:18.41 +57:20:19.8   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53405_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53405_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.32    10:07:14.42 +56:34:03.0   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53406_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53406_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.74    09:36:03.09 +58:29:37.0   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53409_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53409_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.59    09:22:06.97 +54:45:58.5   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53417_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53417_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.79    09:15:11.72 +54:48:05.4   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53420_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53420_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.84    09:13:54.20 +54:43:24.4   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53422_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 53422_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    13.95    09:36:57.03 +54:50:26.0   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 08161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.73    09:19:31.36 +57:17:29.1   1947 5203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

**** FOUND  09:19:31.33 +57:17:29.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37629_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 37629_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 25.45586    2461277.95586    12.85    09:47:19.33 +51:10:21.8   4344 1481   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-56-16_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0342.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.80    09:47:19.03 +51:10:20.6   4345 1485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06690_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343
The candidate 06690_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 25.45642    2461277.95642    12.82    09:05:04.84 +57:30:03.5   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_055750_TTUQ1b1x1_213330_j0AjPimA/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_05-57-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0343.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.4") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed UMa-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461277.95586307 -observatory V36
10:09:25.65 +13:15:28.5 Mercury (-1.9mag)
12:59:53.43 -09:10:49.9 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:38:36.16 +23:34:36.7 Mars (1.3mag)
08:58:11.68 +17:42:18.7 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:19.07 +02:57:37.6 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:14.03 +21:00:49.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:14:53.09 +00:04:32.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:34.74 -23:36:10.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
20:10:14.29 -22:57:51.7 Moon (-11.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 25 05:59 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461277.95586307:
08:58:18.75 +17:41:46.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:58:11.56 +17:42:20.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:58:01.75 +17:43:04.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:58:21.29 +17:41:37.2 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:55:41.30 +17:52:08.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:58:16.13 +17:41:59.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:55:21.21 +17:47:30.6 Elara (17.7mag)
09:02:17.82 +17:14:20.3 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
09:00:11.76 +17:56:40.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:05.44 +02:57:44.1 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:16.67 +02:57:20.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:54:54.79 +02:59:47.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:12.16 +02:58:02.6 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:20.15 +02:48:41.7 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 25 05:59 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461277.95586307:
20:30:55.99 -11:29:09.7 JWST
18:18:41.10 +22:56:58.8 Chandra
06:51:07.40 +04:54:29.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 25 05:59 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461277.95586307 -observatory V36
03:31:00.36 +18:38:27.0 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
18:00:04.82 -34:25:48.6 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:09:09.21 -69:38:12.5 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:44.71 +33:22:50.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:28:02.70 +43:08:31.5 17.6mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:24:06.07 +30:05:03.8 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:59:39.51 +26:13:27.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:37:35.62 +27:43:24.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:40:21.01 +05:17:27.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:16:35.58 -13:01:07.5 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:50:08.86 +63:32:47.7 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:34:41.81 -14:30:41.2 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:26:22.37 +32:10:13.3 15.6mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:41.91 +15:28:17.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:43:48.66 +43:28:51.1 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:44:44.07 +49:41:14.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:27:52.16 -12:54:32.4 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:06:11.65 +21:01:45.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:57:55.89 +19:44:08.8 17.0mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:09:38.05 +01:07:18.2 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:14:46.16 +75:53:52.4 16.4mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:41.64 +46:20:47.2 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
12:01:36.03 +10:12:09.6 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:15:08.97 -33:05:32.1 7.2mag 10P/Tempel
11:39:42.88 -04:32:08.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:42:40.71 -00:58:50.8 17.5mag 63P/Wild
00:50:34.88 -06:16:37.4 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:13:21.02 +20:05:13.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:23:33.62 -25:15:55.8 17.4mag 84P/Giclas
03:13:39.95 +14:40:01.4 17.0mag 88P/Howell
08:37:39.17 +25:05:40.8 16.5mag 93P/Lovas
04:57:03.45 +23:38:00.0 17.1mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:52:24.05 +27:43:00.4 16.0mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:58:47.65 +23:29:33.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:19:00.17 -16:44:43.1 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
06:00:57.57 +20:58:13.5 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:56:50.78 +17:53:44.9 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:58:25.29 +02:59:13.0 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:05:09.55 -18:29:55.9 12.6mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:13:32.60 +38:05:12.1 16.2mag 162P/Siding Spring
10:34:57.87 +25:45:12.3 12.3mag 169P/NEAT
03:10:25.57 +09:16:40.8 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:06.47 -51:23:05.4 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:12:10.52 +31:58:23.8 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:56:13.33 +36:52:10.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:17:44.59 +01:12:12.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:16:29.47 +17:30:34.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 25 05:59 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 25 05:59 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
19:45:06.48 +18:22:42.2  PNV J19450648+1822422  2026-08-25.1278  9.0mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 25 05:59 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
00:05:07.921 +10:35:04.37  AT 2026xqe  2026-08-06.18 19.55
14:11:24.073 +09:49:49.83  AT 2026xqd  2026-08-02.77 19.013
19:40:31.924 -15:29:50.47  AT 2026xqc  2026-08-03.27 20.3348
23:42:32.703 +24:48:57.93  AT 2026xqb  2026-08-05.100 18.58
16:33:55.780 -21:38:59.14  AT 2026xqa  2026-08-03.18 18.0148
21:55:59.445 +07:05:12.88  AT 2026xpz  2026-08-05.35 19.863
16:45:38.067 +72:51:22.66  AT 2026xpy  2026-08-05.91 20.09
16:42:36.347 +57:19:39.63  AT 2026xpx  2026-08-05.92 19.14
11:49:41.968 +31:31:29.11  AT 2026xpw  2026-01-27.50 20.88
09:24:00.803 +39:35:33.95  AT 2026xpv  2026-01-19.40 20.33
12:49:17.559 +46:39:17.78  AT 2026xpu  2026-01-19.61 21.02
09:21:30.163 +36:17:37.77  AT 2026xpt  2026-01-19.40 20.66
07:49:07.955 +40:36:24.67  AT 2026xps  2026-01-18.38 20.96
13:27:11.570 +33:26:06.06  AT 2026xpr  2026-01-17.59 20.66
12:35:40.338 +14:59:49.24  AT 2026xpq  2026-01-17.53 20.38
13:05:21.770 +10:09:12.94  AT 2026xpp  2026-01-16.58 20.11
10:23:27.739 +49:29:35.53  AT 2026xpo  2026-01-14.60 21.05
01:23:04.564 +12:23:08.97  AT 2026xpn  2026-07-29.54 20.19
16:47:23.438 +66:28:39.91  AT 2026xpm  2026-08-05.89 19.92
23:34:35.589 +29:43:01.68  AT 2026xpl  2026-07-27.51 20.27
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 25 05:59 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug 25 05:58:56 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 5s (0.08 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 33s (0.55 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 21s (0.35 min)
FIELD_UMa-06-Q1b1x1: 66s (1.10 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 69s (1.15 min)
Finished: Tue Aug 25 06:00:05 CDT 2026