This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 11.94 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0
173.86716 -15.60426 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 1 1 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 32 58.74 +24 40 46.0 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 12.76 04:23:16.68 +24:34:03.4
172.44057 -17.33682 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:16.68 +24:34:03.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:16.68 +24:34:03.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 23 16.68 +24 34 03.4 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,12.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 12.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 13.69 04:35:50.25 +23:49:04.4
174.98721 -15.66260 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -0 0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:50.25 +23:49:04.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:50.25 +23:49:04.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 35 50.25 +23 49 04.4 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,13.69,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 13.69CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 14.20 04:25:04.22 +20:48:39.9
175.70235 -19.50645 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -1 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:04.22 +20:48:39.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:04.22 +20:48:39.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 25 04.22 +20 48 39.9 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 14.36 04:22:03.47 +24:49:06.0
172.05104 -17.37482 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.418 Alemannia -1 -0 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:03.47 +24:49:06.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:03.47 +24:49:06.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 22 03.47 +24 49 06.0 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,14.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 14.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 14.59 04:48:10.96 +25:18:07.1
175.62970 -12.54925 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.422 Berolina -1 0 1 14.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:10.96 +25:18:07.1: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:10.96 +25:18:07.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 48 10.96 +25 18 07.1 14.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,14.59,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 14.59CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.4300 2461277.9300 14.88 04:31:53.68 +20:05:16.8
177.37802 -18.75021 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.940 Kordula -2 0 2 15.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:53.68 +20:05:16.8: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:53.68 +20:05:16.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.4300* 04 31 53.68 +20 05 16.8 14.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.9300,14.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.4300 14.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461277.93027328 25.08.2026 10:19:25.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9992
Objects passed selection criteria: 9956
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7456
Average stars matched: 6938.25 (93.0559 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 235504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:27:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461277.93027328 25.08.2026 10:19:25.611 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 163
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 32 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 74009
Objects passed selection criteria: 73825
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 57167.8
Average stars matched: 53193.2 (93.0477 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 288920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 05:28:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.92980034
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0123 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00648 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KudiqLywgp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OVpMmrMpPn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ib0P7qUdof
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6Zpzibcj2p
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.KudiqLywgp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=2517, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 8622 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4820 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5302)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.247 n_q1=1641 n_q2=611 n_q3=1816 n_q4=752 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OVpMmrMpPn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=2444, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 7922 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4817 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4818 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9127 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4818 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4818 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.291 n_q1=1645 n_q2=622 n_q3=1785 n_q4=766 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.ib0P7qUdof (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=570, bad_region=2694, passed=8660
Got 8660 stars (including 5540 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8660 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4882 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4866 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4866 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=7.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.383 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.515 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.706 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4866 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.462 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4866 robust_rms_before=1.113 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.438 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.485 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.462
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.485 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits N_match=4866 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.483 n_q1=1427 n_q2=1155 n_q3=1468 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.129
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.6Zpzibcj2p (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=560, bad_region=2707, passed=8677
Got 8677 stars (including 5556 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4865 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6497 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5351)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=7.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.372 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.492 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.684 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=1.090 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.383 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.487 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.458
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.487 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.447 n_q1=1417 n_q2=1161 n_q3=1477 n_q4=810 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.311 worst_q_ratio=1.284
ref2=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.366 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits sigma_overall=0.470 worst_q_ratio=1.129
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.172
reference average sigma_overall=0.3385 worst_q_ratio=1.2645
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4818 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375_astrometric_residuals.png (4866 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0: 16.20 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21352.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 20267_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:06.09 +22:54:23.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21352_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 21352_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.61 +20:16:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0078 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0123 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:57.421 +21:59:57.87
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:59.046 +21:59:52.05
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00648 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Jso5bjB8Uz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zqpUDsoC7z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pyQmsmrYRu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zTCXAbSaOF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.845600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.845600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.17
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.68
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.4)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 124 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Jso5bjB8Uz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=6242, bad_region=13891, passed=86324
Got 86324 stars (including 66886 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4848 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4848 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75480 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4848 stars left (next iteration limit 5332)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4848 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.248 n_q1=1602 n_q2=612 n_q3=1848 n_q4=786 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zqpUDsoC7z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=5759, bad_region=13221, passed=80633
Got 80633 stars (including 62313 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80633 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 70302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1583 n_q2=633 n_q3=1821 n_q4=807 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pyQmsmrYRu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3401, bad_region=14576, passed=59787
Got 59787 stars (including 42947 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59787 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4876 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4876 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48748 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5363)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=7.366 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.519 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.466 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.096 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.426 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.409 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.480 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.466
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.480 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.531 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1459 n_q2=1150 n_q3=1433 n_q4=833 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.zTCXAbSaOF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3455, bad_region=14606, passed=59581
Got 59581 stars (including 42728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59581 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48417 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48415 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=7.349 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.670 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.446 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=1.072 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.406 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.476 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.446
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.476 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.439 n_q1=1471 n_q2=1135 n_q3=1448 n_q4=825 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-18-44_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0375.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_052436_TTUQ2b1x1_2566026_tW1PZZxn/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:20.42 +21:31:12.1: 13.74 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:13.61 +21:46:21.6: 14.42 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:35.37 +18:54:49.3: 14.13 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:16.29 +21:54:07.8: 13.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:19.25 +23:06:33.2: 14.48 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:43.64 +19:50:56.7: 14.74 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:53:26.68 +24:33:35.7: 15.03 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:50:59.42 +24:13:59.8: 15.07 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:11.12 +22:13:26.9: 14.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:28.73 +18:58:25.3: 15.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:43.64 +19:50:56.7: 14.74 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:35.37 +18:54:49.3: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:16.29 +21:54:07.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:53:26.68 +24:33:35.7: 15.65 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:19.25 +23:06:33.2: 14.47 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.74 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:43.64 +19:50:56.7: ref_mag=14.74 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.7214 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:53:26.68 +24:33:35.7: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.9075 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:48:35.37 +18:54:49.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2883 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:16.29 +21:54:07.8: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.8863 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:13.61 +21:46:21.6: 14.42 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:19.25 +23:06:33.2: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5460 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:13.61 +21:46:21.6: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.6324 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:11.12 +22:13:26.9: 14.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:23:11.12 +22:13:26.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7188 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:28.73 +18:58:25.3: 14.88 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:28.73 +18:58:25.3: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.8526 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:20.42 +21:31:12.1: 13.80 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:20.42 +21:31:12.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9161 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:50:59.42 +24:13:59.8: 15.06 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:50:59.42 +24:13:59.8: ref_mag=15.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.8594 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:42.94 +20:34:07.9: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:18:41.50 +23:57:27.5: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:17.51 +20:33:29.5: 13.75 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:13.89 +18:32:38.6: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:06.78 +22:05:05.1: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:13.77 +25:16:23.9: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:42.94 +20:34:07.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:17.51 +20:33:29.5: 13.71 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:13.89 +18:32:38.6: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:42.94 +20:34:07.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5314 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:17.51 +20:33:29.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7658 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:13.89 +18:32:38.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.6583 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:18:41.50 +23:57:27.5: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:18:41.50 +23:57:27.5: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7773 delta=-0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:23:16.68 +24:34:03.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:13.77 +25:16:23.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:06.78 +22:05:05.1: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:13.77 +25:16:23.9: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7480 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.97 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:06.78 +22:05:05.1: ref_mag=12.97 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.2642 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:23:16.68 +24:34:03.4: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:50.25 +23:49:04.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:07.8: 13.89 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:50.25 +23:49:04.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:51:02.14 +24:08:02.3: 14.14 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:55:47.14 +17:45:16.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:07.8: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:38.5: 14.17 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:47.26 +22:58:07.8: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9248 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:51:02.14 +24:08:02.3: 14.06 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:51:02.14 +24:08:02.3: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9733 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:55:47.14 +17:45:16.3: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:55:47.14 +17:45:16.3: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9527 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:38.5: 14.15 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:54.25 +26:03:38.5: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0764 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:04.22 +20:48:39.9: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:54:11.06 +23:04:45.5: 14.08 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:11.98 +18:28:57.6: 13.97 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:14.69 +20:33:17.3: 14.20 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:04.22 +20:48:39.9: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:08.2: 13.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:54:11.06 +23:04:45.5: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:54:11.06 +23:04:45.5: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1490 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:14.69 +20:33:17.3: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:11.98 +18:28:57.6: 13.91 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:14.69 +20:33:17.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2327 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:11.98 +18:28:57.6: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0665 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:26.77 +18:49:54.7: 14.33 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:08.2: 13.82 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:27.03 +23:15:08.2: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0874 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:47:45.44 +19:20:17.6: 14.14 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:26.77 +18:49:54.7: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.27 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:26.77 +18:49:54.7: ref_mag=14.27 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3225 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:47:45.44 +19:20:17.6: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:47:45.44 +19:20:17.6: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1842 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:52:58.11 +23:28:51.2: 14.46 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:03.47 +24:49:06.0: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:48:10.96 +25:18:07.1: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:16.5: 14.40 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:52:58.11 +23:28:51.2: 14.40 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:52:58.11 +23:28:51.2: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2983 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:03.47 +24:49:06.0: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:48:10.96 +25:18:07.1: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:03.57 +17:44:05.7: 14.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:01.05 +19:10:17.2: 14.27 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:16.5: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:41:53.34 +24:49:16.5: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3841 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:03.57 +17:44:05.7: 14.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:03.57 +17:44:05.7: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4258 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:56:15.10 +24:15:04.8: 14.30 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:01.05 +19:10:17.2: 14.36 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:01.05 +19:10:17.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4607 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:56:15.10 +24:15:04.8: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:15.10 +24:15:04.8: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3759 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:03.3: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:10.29 +22:14:40.6: 14.46 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:03.3: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:17.74 +23:02:03.3: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4613 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:44:20.84 +22:55:31.8: 14.81 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:10.29 +22:14:40.6: 14.32 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:10.29 +22:14:40.6: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5490 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.4: 14.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:44:20.84 +22:55:31.8: 14.75 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:44:20.84 +22:55:31.8: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7121 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.4: 14.71 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.72 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:25:51.20 +22:09:14.4: ref_mag=14.72 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7038 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:21.27 +22:18:00.0: 15.15 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:36:40.12 +19:27:49.4: 15.19 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:21.27 +22:18:00.0: 15.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:21.27 +22:18:00.0: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8991 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:30.41 +20:35:37.9: 15.26 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:53.68 +20:05:16.8: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:45:33.48 +21:34:14.1: 14.94 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:36:40.12 +19:27:49.4: 15.21 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:36:40.12 +19:27:49.4: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.9798 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:30.41 +20:35:37.9: 15.28 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.27 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:30.41 +20:35:37.9: ref_mag=15.27 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8868 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:53.68 +20:05:16.8: 16.30 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:45:33.48 +21:34:14.1: 15.13 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:45:33.48 +21:34:14.1: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.9033 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:36.05 +21:41:42.7: 15.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:31:36.80 +21:08:32.8: 15.27 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:15.34 +19:11:26.7: 15.46 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:36.05 +21:41:42.7: 15.32 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:36.05 +21:41:42.7: ref_mag=15.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0502 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:31:36.80 +21:08:32.8: 15.09 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.18 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:31:36.80 +21:08:32.8: ref_mag=15.18 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.9022 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:58.14 +18:20:50.6: 15.54 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:15.34 +19:11:26.7: 15.75 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.55 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:27:15.34 +19:11:26.7: ref_mag=15.55 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=15.0403 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:58.14 +18:20:50.6: 16.03 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.65 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:58.14 +18:20:50.6: ref_mag=15.65 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=15.0952 delta=0.56 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: 15.26 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:49:51.67 +21:28:07.5: 15.12 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: 15.10 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:49:51.67 +21:28:07.5: 14.92 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:42:13.36 +22:52:34.6: ref_mag=15.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1927 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:49:51.67 +21:28:07.5: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=15.1577 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:46:48.07 +21:29:30.6: 15.31 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:40:48.51 +21:12:03.9: 15.30 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:46:48.07 +21:29:30.6: 15.33 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:40:48.51 +21:12:03.9: 15.76 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.42 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.32 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:40:48.51 +21:12:03.9: ref_mag=15.42 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=15.2502 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:46:48.07 +21:29:30.6: ref_mag=15.32 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=15.0707 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102513.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out104906.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out106433.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107453.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out107757.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out110276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100424_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100424_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100426_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100426_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100430_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100430_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100431_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100441_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100441_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100449_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100457_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100459_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100460_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100460_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:22.88 +20:41:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100462_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100462_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100463_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100464_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100467_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 100468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 101128_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.71 +19:10:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101415_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 101415_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 101489_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101517_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 101517_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:58.74 +24:40:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102058_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 102058_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:45.28 +19:28:44.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 102454_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:48.87 +21:18:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102513_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 102513_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 102644_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.14 +22:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102670_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 102670_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 103141_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103555_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 103555_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.25 +19:58:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103578_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 103578_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.70 +22:56:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103932_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 103932_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104065_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104065_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104131_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104131_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104149_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104149_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.86 +21:31:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104468_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.54 +18:42:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104472_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104702_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104702_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.04 +23:18:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104830_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104830_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104859_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104859_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.16 +21:45:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 104906_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104929_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.59 +21:52:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104930_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 104930_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.41 +24:06:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105041_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105041_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105332_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105353_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105420_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105420_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105434_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105455_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105455_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105509_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105647_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105647_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105700_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105773_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105773_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105840_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105840_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105858_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105858_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105890_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 105890_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106003_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106003_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.62 +24:19:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106020_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106020_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:38.41 +17:55:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106099_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106209_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106209_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106272_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106272_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106336_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106336_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106433_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 106433_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106437_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106473_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106556_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106661_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106661_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106742_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106742_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106785_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106785_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106840_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106840_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:59.07 +20:19:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106903_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 106903_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107019_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:37.21 +19:15:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107029_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107029_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.26 +23:36:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107138_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107138_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107158_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107158_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107195_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107195_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107252_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107252_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:37.49 +21:31:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107255_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107287_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107401_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107401_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.95 +21:03:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107453_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 107453_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107498_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107508_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107716_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107716_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:59.09 +18:07:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107757_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 107757_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107843_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107843_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107844_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107844_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 107959_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108090_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108110_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108110_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108338_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108338_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108364_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108364_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108601_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108683_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108683_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108770_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108770_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108862_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108862_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108922_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108922_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108932_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108932_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.92 +23:58:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108936_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 108936_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.75 +20:33:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109134_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109175_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109175_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109393_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109393_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109567_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109567_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109595_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109595_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:34.92 +20:26:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109768_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 109768_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110046_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110046_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110136_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110136_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110147_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110147_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110276_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
Preparing report for the candidate 110276_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110382_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110382_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110407_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110407_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110486_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110527_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110527_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110719_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110719_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110729_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110729_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110772_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110772_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:49.12 +22:53:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110819_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110819_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110831_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110833_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110833_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110837_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110837_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110869_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110869_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110877_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110877_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110880_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110881_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110881_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110919_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110919_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110939_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 110939_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_05-19-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0376 did not pass the final checks
