######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Lyn-05-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Lyn-05-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 140635 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 140635 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.png' -> 'transient_report/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits_preview.png'
Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits

renamed 'Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.png' -> 'transient_report/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits_preview.png'
Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 490.7508
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 624.0215
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1891.9512
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 488.3573
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1894.8269
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 493.4425
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.85522
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.010
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 22.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-25T04:45:42.3402431' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-25T09:45:42.3402431' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61277.4067400461 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-25T09:45:52.2407890' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61277.4068546295 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 114.542406704233 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000278035794 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.3308333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 54.3 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.73254202610013 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lyn-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 38 11' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20454 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20454 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 22.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 22.9799995422363 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 34.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 59.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/d_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits :)
Spent 0.625162 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/d_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 23.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-25T04:46:24.4156305' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-25T09:46:24.4156305' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61277.4072270254 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-25T09:46:34.3158405' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61277.4073416088 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 114.542406639308 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0000278152173 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 15.4486111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 54.3733333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 3.70555790793375 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Lyn-05' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '07 38 11' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20454 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20454 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 23.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 23.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 34.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 901.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 24.8 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 59.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.700376 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/d_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits :)
Spent 0.861078 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/d_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits

fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Last image: 2461277.90685579 25.08.2026 09:45:42.340 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus?
Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits to check the telescope pointing
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 1877 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out863020.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out863020.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4115.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4114.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 66.9293 (1.16692e+29), 22 match, 0 conflict, 78 distractors, 189 index.
RA,Dec = (114.376,38.0189), pixel scale 5.92727 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ----+-----+----+--+---+---++----++-+-------++--++--------+------------+--+--------+---+-----+--+---+(best)
Field 1: solved with index index-4113.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out863020.solved to indicate this.
Field: out863020.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (114.344303, 37.996150) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:37:22.633, +37:59:46.141).
Field size: 15.4955 x 10.5485 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -0.93075 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits' -> 'fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 25 05:15 fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 25 05:15 out863020.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits (fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out863020.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out863020.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.21 degrees of RA,Dec (114.345,37.997)
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4116.fits, field objects 1-100).
log-odds ratio 22.8443 (8.33953e+09), 6 match, 0 conflict, 21 distractors, 38 index.
RA,Dec = (114.434,37.9859), pixel scale 5.93334 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+--+--+--+-----------+(best)-----------+------------------------------+------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4115.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out863020.solved to indicate this.
Field: out863020.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (114.423092, 37.992788) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:37:41.542, +37:59:34.037).
Field size: 15.5222 x 10.5195 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -1.5499 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 25 05:15 fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 25 05:15 out863020.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 10455 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.2547, 948.226] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 36.9041 (1.06473e+16), 6 match, 0 conflict, 31 distractors, 17 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++------------+---------+-------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (3 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (3 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
--> log-odds 36.9041
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 80.8451 (1.28993e+35), 11 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 37 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-----++-----++-+-----++-------+(best)---------------------------------------+-----------------------
--> log-odds 80.8451
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 109.311 (2.97391e+47), 20 match, 0 conflict, 57 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-----+++----++++-----+++-----++------+--+------------+-------+--------+(best)-----------------------
--> log-odds 109.311
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 145.619 (1.74321e+63), 28 match, 0 conflict, 49 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-+---+++----++++-----+++-----++------++-+----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++(best)----------------------+
--> log-odds 145.619
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 215.251 (3.03486e+93), 48 match, 0 conflict, 102 distractors, 364 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++------++-+----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++-------+------+-------+
--> log-odds 215.251
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 365.923 (8.28644e+158), 99 match, 1 conflict, 233 distractors, 721 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++------++-+----++------+-++----+-+-+---++------++------+-++----+
--> log-odds 365.923
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 599.611 (2.55779e+260), 220 match, 0 conflict, 602 distractors, 1432 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++-+----++-+----++------+-++----+-+-+---++------+++-----+-++----+
--> log-odds 599.611
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.2547, 948.226] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
--> log-odds 0
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 36.9041 (1.06473e+16), 6 match, 0 conflict, 31 distractors, 17 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++------------+---------+-------+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (6 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (3 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (4 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (3 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
fit-wcs.c:118:fit_sip_wcs: Too few correspondences for the SIP order specified (2 < 10)
--> log-odds 36.9041
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 80.8451 (1.28993e+35), 11 match, 0 conflict, 26 distractors, 37 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-----++-----++-+-----++-------+(best)---------------------------------------+-----------------------
--> log-odds 80.8451
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 109.311 (2.97391e+47), 20 match, 0 conflict, 57 distractors, 91 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-----+++----++++-----+++-----++------+--+------------+-------+--------+(best)-----------------------
--> log-odds 109.311
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 145.619 (1.74321e+63), 28 match, 0 conflict, 49 distractors, 188 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++-+---+++----++++-----+++-----++------++-+----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++(best)----------------------+
--> log-odds 145.619
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 215.251 (3.03486e+93), 48 match, 0 conflict, 102 distractors, 364 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++------++-+----++------+-+-----+-+-+---++-------+------+-------+
--> log-odds 215.251
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 365.923 (8.28644e+158), 99 match, 1 conflict, 233 distractors, 721 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++------++-+----++------+-++----+-+-+---++------++------+-++----+
--> log-odds 365.923
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 599.611 (2.55779e+260), 220 match, 0 conflict, 602 distractors, 1432 index.
RA,Dec = (114.422,37.9919), pixel scale 5.94127 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ---+++++---++++---++++-+---+++-----++-+----++-+----++------+-++----+-+-+---++------+++-----+-++----+
--> log-odds 599.611
Got 14 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (114.419990, 37.995624) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (07:37:40.798, +37:59:44.246).
Field size: 15.5147 x 10.5442 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is -1.52583 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Image size: 927.6'x623.7' 15.5(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.81"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:37:41.042 +37:59:47.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2012 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky879783.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23
Second-epoch image center 07:37:41.042 +37:59:47.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.1018 deg.
###################################
The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.1018 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
The gain value (GAIN=0.370) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.9,6.9,6.2,7.6,8.2,8.9 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 6.9,6.9,6.2,7.6,8.3,9.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T06:04:26.0896492
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T06:04:26.0896492
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-11T06:04:26.089
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461082.75319547 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8005.192 16.069 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7536.071 17.016 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8277.890 15.120 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8757.764 12.764 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8761.756 6.821 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8597.384 14.109 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7995.168 12.822 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7733.734 9.885 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8497.367 7.711 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8674.383 7.301 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 11157, (11156 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 5097
* rejected close to frame edge: 62
* rejected as being too small (<1.5 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.1 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 2
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.49
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.5 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -9.7
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -10.5
Selected detection limit= -10.5
Final detection limit= -10.5 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.06.1 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 2
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
11104 * detected, using 497/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.008694, number_of_ambiguous_matches=97
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=10489 inliers=10489 rms 0.25 -> 0.24 pix, max corner correction 0.3 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.004481, number_of_ambiguous_matches=50
10487 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=10487 inliers=10487 rms 0.16 -> 0.16 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.002689, number_of_ambiguous_matches=30
10486 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=10486 inliers=10486 rms 0.14 -> 0.14 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000986, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11
10485 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 0.006
11104 stars detected, 10485 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 9543, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 9543 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 9543 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix +0.00066
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 9542 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.49
11776 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 203672 kB used, 237896 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:45:42.3402431
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:45:42.3402431
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-25T09:45:42.340
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
The star 7671.186 469.265 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7792.654 629.604 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7803.269 716.783 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7609.533 736.330 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7951.256 743.470 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8012.748 792.318 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8077.184 836.855 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7777.939 865.425 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7518.411 926.683 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8076.132 957.934 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 1661
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 329
* rejected close to frame edge: 12
* rejected as being too small (<1.7 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 10
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
1661 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000934, number_of_ambiguous_matches=11
the annealed match radius failed on this field, retrying with the strict radius... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
Too few * matched: 28 < 332 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = 0.006
1661 stars detected, 28 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (28 < 332) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:46:24.4156305
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:46:24.4156305
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-25T09:46:24.415
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
The star 7580.099 48.755 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7625.318 137.277 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8776.470 468.071 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7666.828 474.389 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7939.129 562.591 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7788.415 634.698 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7799.081 721.896 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7605.248 741.419 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7946.984 748.584 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8008.502 797.453 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 1598
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 0
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 340
* rejected close to frame edge: 15
* rejected as being too small (<1.7 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>6.9 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 12
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
1598 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000764, number_of_ambiguous_matches=9
the annealed match radius failed on this field, retrying with the strict radius... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000000, number_of_ambiguous_matches=0
Too few * matched: 29 < 319 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = 167.995
1598 stars detected, 29 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (29 < 319) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 22261 (22261 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2642 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3120 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1304 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 1282 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 2137 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found?
Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list
ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
.......................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 10359 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
ERROR running VaST on the field Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.75319547 ap= 6.1 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 11157 *matched= 11157 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
exp_start= 11.02.2026 06:05:10.512 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.75370963 ap= 6.1 rotation= 0.006 *detected= 11104 *matched= 10485 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
exp_start= 25.08.2026 09:45:42.340 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461277.90685579 ap= 6.9 rotation= 0.006 *detected= 1661 *matched= 28 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
exp_start= 25.08.2026 09:46:24.415 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461277.90734277 ap= 6.9 rotation= 167.995 *detected= 1598 *matched= 29 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Last image: 2461277.90685579 25.08.2026 09:45:42.340 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus?
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.4,5.4,4.8,5.9,6.5,7.0 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.2,5.2,4.7,5.7,6.2,6.7 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 7 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T06:04:26.0896492
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-11T06:04:26.0896492
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-02-11T06:04:26.089
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461082.75319547 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8249.066 19.189 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7536.063 17.021 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9157.079 16.465 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8277.868 15.141 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8005.188 16.073 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 7995.164 12.825 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8757.760 12.765 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8761.757 6.820 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8818.830 15.041 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 8597.401 14.097 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 74091, (74090 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 31
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 25088
* rejected close to frame edge: 326
* rejected as being too small (<1.1 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 48
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.14
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.1 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.5
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.6
Selected detection limit= -7.6
Final detection limit= -7.6 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.6 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 57
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
73889 * detected, using 498/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015683, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1162
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=68247 inliers=68247 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015670, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1161
68247 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=68247 inliers=68247 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.015670, number_of_ambiguous_matches=1161
68247 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=68247 inliers=68247 rms 0.35 -> 0.35 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.007126, number_of_ambiguous_matches=528
68180 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 0.006
73889 stars detected, 68180 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 62173, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 62173 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 62171 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix +0.00000*Y_pix -0.00288
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 59198 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.14
79800 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 260152 kB used, 295444 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:45:42.3402431
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:45:42.3402431
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-25T09:45:42.340
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
The star 7584.318 43.626 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7508.798 45.661 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7520.593 96.685 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7560.549 110.338 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7629.468 131.825 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7583.222 157.952 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7501.507 204.827 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7603.524 205.072 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7513.468 215.674 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 9343.037 218.007 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 12317
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 2
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1786
* rejected close to frame edge: 91
* rejected as being too small (<1.4 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.4 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 92
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
12317 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001429, number_of_ambiguous_matches=114
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=1 pairs=2800 inliers=2800 rms 4.78 -> 4.77 pix, max corner correction 0.8 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001391, number_of_ambiguous_matches=111
2795 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=2795 inliers=2795 rms 4.76 -> 4.76 pix, max corner correction 1.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001441, number_of_ambiguous_matches=115
2795 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=2795 inliers=2795 rms 4.76 -> 4.75 pix, max corner correction 0.9 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000326, number_of_ambiguous_matches=26
1634 * matched (3rd iteration). Too few * matched: 1634 < 2463 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = 179.896
12317 stars detected, 1634 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (1634 < 2463) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:46:24.4156305
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-25T09:46:24.4156305
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-25T09:46:24.415
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
The star 7506.765 1.914 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7580.097 48.755 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7504.690 50.489 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8920.106 54.991 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7598.444 70.191 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7516.314 101.783 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7556.090 115.553 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7625.316 137.278 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7578.835 163.033 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 7647.985 182.255 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 12283
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 7
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 1882
* rejected close to frame edge: 102
* rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 78
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
12283 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000739, number_of_ambiguous_matches=59
the annealed match radius failed on this field, retrying with the strict radius... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000188, number_of_ambiguous_matches=15
Too few * matched: 1265 < 2456 ! Retrying...
rotation [degrees] = 120.095
12283 stars detected, 1265 stars matched
ERROR! Too few stars matched (1265 < 2456) . Wrong match? Skipping file...
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 5 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 147980 (147980 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 3 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 11707 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 19782 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 10098 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 9400 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 17193 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 6 seconds
WARNING: Can't open candidates-transients.lst for reading! -- No candidates found?
Non-zero exit code of lib/transient_list
ERROR running lib/create_list_of_candidate_transients.sh
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 67850 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
ERROR running VaST on the field Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.75319547 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 74091 *matched= 74091 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
exp_start= 11.02.2026 06:05:10.512 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461082.75370963 ap= 4.6 rotation= 0.006 *detected= 73889 *matched= 68180 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
exp_start= 25.08.2026 09:45:42.340 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461277.90685579 ap= 5.4 rotation= 179.896 *detected= 12317 *matched= 1634 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-45-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0339.fits
exp_start= 25.08.2026 09:46:24.415 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461277.90734277 ap= 5.2 rotation= 120.095 *detected= 12283 *matched= 1265 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_045234_TTUQ2b1x1_1902874_UcggpFmf/fd_Lyn-05-Q2b1x1_2026-08-25_04-46-24_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0340.fits
########### Completed Lyn-05-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
ls: cannot access 'planets.txt': No such file or directory
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT):
ls: cannot access 'moons.txt': No such file or directory
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT):
ls: cannot access 'spacecraft.txt': No such file or directory
############################################################
ls: cannot access 'comets.txt': No such file or directory
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
ls: cannot access 'asassn_transients_list.txt': No such file or directory
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
ls: cannot access 'tocp_transients_list.txt': No such file or directory