This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.87 06:32:21.91 +18:48:08.4
194.04587 4.41232 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -1 2 2 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:32:21.91 +18:48:08.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:32:21.91 +18:48:08.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461277.8912,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260825.3912 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.16 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0
195.86479 -0.28871 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J061830+1500.4
Type: MISC
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.700 V Y 0.870 V 2452889.90000 85.942805000000 M7
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 18 30.44 +15 00 18.0 12.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J061830+1500.4,2461277.8912,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J061830+1500.4 20260825.3912 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.77 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7
197.35947 -4.29814 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ASASSN-V J060657.96+114630.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.500 V 14.840 V 2457413.78400 44.280000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 06 58.00 +11 46 31.7 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J060657.96+114630.3,2461277.8912,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J060657.96+114630.3 20260825.3912 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.40 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8
200.67446 1.43967 galactic Mon Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.1" and 10.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J063400.70+113325.1
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.267 r Y 0.807 r 2458279.51970 365.889460700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J063400.70+113325.1,2461277.8912,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J063400.70+113325.1 20260825.3912 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 13.03 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6
195.21924 0.40090 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" Gaia DR3 3369086283876745728
Type: SR|M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.240 G 12.400 G 311.800000000000 M
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 19 45.75 +15 53 59.6 13.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 3369086283876745728,2461277.8912,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 3369086283876745728 20260825.3912 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 11.09 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9
197.36017 3.14912 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0381 Gem
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.300 V 13.500 V 2452891.70000 107.000000000000 M10
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0381 Gem,2461277.8912,11.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0381 Gem 20260825.3912 11.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.92 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4
193.97463 -3.93471 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" NSVS J0601303+145408
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.057 r Y 0.620 r 2458432.11440 119.143395100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 01 30.75 +14 54 04.4 12.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J0601303+145408,2461277.8912,12.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J0601303+145408 20260825.3912 12.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.57 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5
199.75873 2.12934 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J063447.75+124112.3
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.880 V 14.540 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J063447.75+124112.3,2461277.8912,12.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J063447.75+124112.3 20260825.3912 12.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.81 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5
198.50722 -0.51598 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 9.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J062248.64+123402.2
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.080 V 14.340 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 22 48.66 +12 34 02.5 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062248.64+123402.2,2461277.8912,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062248.64+123402.2 20260825.3912 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.3912 2461277.8912 12.80 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7
197.10356 -2.17078 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 9.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 4" ASASSN-V J061406.61+130111.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.210 V 14.420 V 2458206.75000 44.430000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.3912* 06 14 06.47 +13 01 14.7 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J061406.61+130111.2,2461277.8912,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J061406.61+130111.2 20260825.3912 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
First image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Last image: 2461277.89154706 25.08.2026 09:23:39.666 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28278
Objects passed selection criteria: 28157
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 20387.2
Average stars matched: 19503.2 (95.664 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 253100 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 04:27:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
First image: 2461032.81662337 23.12.2025 07:35:46.259 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Last image: 2461277.89154706 25.08.2026 09:23:39.666 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 163
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 54 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 204471
Objects passed selection criteria: 203971
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 147147
Average stars matched: 139880 (95.0619 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 667748 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 04:29:00 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.89086583
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:44.384 +14:00:26.56 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:44.384 +14:00:26.56
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0711 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:41.639 +13:59:48.43 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:41.639 +13:59:48.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0583 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:13:44.384 +14:00:26.56
Second-epoch second image center 06:13:41.639 +13:59:48.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01534 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SlXaxFOWvG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TWK4rJfnlb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.drwV7TaHYk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fQueus8Dm4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec +8.6286 to +19.2777 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec 8.6286 to 19.2777 deg
Loaded 17819 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13015 out of 14781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14781 out of 31404 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.949600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.949600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.75
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.20
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec +8.6286 to +19.2777 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6789 deg, Dec 8.6286 to 19.2777 deg
Loaded 17819 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13015 out of 14781 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14781 out of 31404 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 31324 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.9118 to 101.4962 deg, Dec +8.4421 to +19.3403 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.9118 to 101.4962 deg, Dec 8.4421 to 19.3403 deg
Loaded 18085 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12980 out of 14663 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14663 out of 31324 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
2.1 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.9 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
15.2 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.5 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SlXaxFOWvG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3718, bad_region=0, passed=31404
Got 31404 stars (including 27641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31404 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31404 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4783 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=4783 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1170 n_q2=1223 n_q3=1237 n_q4=1153 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.TWK4rJfnlb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3619, bad_region=0, passed=31324
Got 31324 stars (including 27657 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31324 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31324 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.408 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=1017 n_q2=1324 n_q3=1130 n_q4=1316 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.226
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.drwV7TaHYk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, bad_region=0, passed=9559
Got 9559 stars (including 9083 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4750 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4749 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4748 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9557 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4748 stars left (next iteration limit 5223)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4748 robust_rms=7.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.859 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4748 robust_rms=0.567 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.193 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4748 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4748 robust_rms_before=1.686 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.494 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.626 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.548
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 945.5'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:44.504 +14:00:24.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9559 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4027089.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.686 -> 0.432 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4748 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.594 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.533 n_q1=1331 n_q2=825 n_q3=1577 n_q4=1015 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.303
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.fQueus8Dm4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=466, bad_region=0, passed=9780
Got 9780 stars (including 9306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4825 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4749 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4747 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.3 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4744 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9778 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4744 stars left (next iteration limit 5221)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=7.498 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.627 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.922 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4744 robust_rms=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.578 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4744 robust_rms_before=1.520 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.495 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.417 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.646 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.578
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:41.747 +13:59:46.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9780 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4027329.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.520 -> 0.417 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4744 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.431 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1314 n_q2=827 n_q3=1562 n_q4=1041 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.501
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits sigma_overall=0.380 worst_q_ratio=1.257
ref2=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits sigma_overall=0.407 worst_q_ratio=1.226
new1=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.303
new2=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.431 worst_q_ratio=1.501
reference average sigma_overall=0.3935 worst_q_ratio=1.2415
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386_astrometric_residuals.png (4783 matched stars from wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4748 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4744 matched stars from wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53440_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 53440_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:57.41 +16:35:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 03932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.67 +17:54:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50700_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 50700_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:03.40 +12:39:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13737_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 13737_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:57.62 +14:36:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26612_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 26612_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:58.61 +09:53:43.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07431_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 07431_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:42.70 +16:23:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Image size: 945.5'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:44.504 +14:00:24.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:44.504 +14:00:24.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0715 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.8' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:13:41.747 +13:59:46.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:13:27.287 +13:59:26.52
Second-epoch image center 06:13:41.747 +13:59:46.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0587 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:13:44.504 +14:00:24.86
Second-epoch second image center 06:13:41.747 +13:59:46.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01535 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AkXbusZY8i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits &> /tmp/tmp.R2wLzI7JZt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V13aAyIpdP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7CRcF0gYZ2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits and wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 229058 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec +8.6174 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec 8.6174 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 17847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9852 out of 15551 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15551 out of 229058 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.805100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.805100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 229058 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec +8.6174 to +19.2791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 85.0776 to 101.6828 deg, Dec 8.6174 to 19.2791 deg
Loaded 17847 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 9852 out of 15551 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15551 out of 229058 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 230307 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 84.9070 to 101.4968 deg, Dec +8.4421 to +19.3422 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 84.9070 to 101.4968 deg, Dec 8.4421 to 19.3422 deg
Loaded 18095 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10167 out of 15481 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15481 out of 230307 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 156 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
1.9 pix Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
2.8 pix fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AkXbusZY8i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=66, blended=37651, bad_region=12, passed=228992
Got 228992 stars (including 190970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 228992 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 493 to 548 (Dec 8.6 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4770 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 228992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4770 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits N_match=4770 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.325 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1241 n_q4=1191 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.197
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.R2wLzI7JZt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=82, blended=35229, bad_region=4, passed=230225
Got 230225 stars (including 194609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 230225 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4781 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4781 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 492 to 548 (Dec 8.4 to 19.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 230225 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4778 stars left (next iteration limit 5259)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits N_match=4778 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.328 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1162 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits -region wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.V13aAyIpdP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3593, bad_region=4, passed=65763
Got 65763 stars (including 62080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013132 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010506 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 65754 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4752 stars left (next iteration limit 5228)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=7.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.197 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=0.572 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.218 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4752 robust_rms_before=0.432 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.547 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.553
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.547 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits N_match=4752 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.630 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=1321 n_q2=803 n_q3=1591 n_q4=1037 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.296
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7CRcF0gYZ2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3674, bad_region=3, passed=66858
Got 66858 stars (including 63109 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66858 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4752 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4751 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 491 to 549 (Dec 8.2 to 19.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4753 stars left (next iteration limit 5226)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=7.559 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.190 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.917 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4753 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.585 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4753 robust_rms_before=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.509 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.586 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.585
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.586 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits N_match=4753 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.493 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.502 n_q1=1312 n_q2=805 n_q3=1581 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-22-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0250.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_042420_TTUQ1b1x1_3811963_11UVfAPx/wcs_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:55:38.40 +12:29:16.8: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:45:02.66 +17:13:43.6: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:23:42.00 +09:35:44.8: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:40.45 +11:40:34.5: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:14:10.67 +14:28:22.8: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:49:48.34 +13:27:29.5: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:23:42.00 +09:35:44.8: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:55:38.40 +12:29:16.8: 12.81 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:45:02.66 +17:13:43.6: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:40.45 +11:40:34.5: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:49:48.34 +13:27:29.5: 13.49 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:14:10.67 +14:28:22.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:42.00 +09:35:44.8: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0130 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:38.40 +12:29:16.8: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7469 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:02.66 +17:13:43.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2487 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:40.45 +11:40:34.5: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3832 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:48.34 +13:27:29.5: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2317 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:10.67 +14:28:22.8: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2191 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:47:26.33 +12:16:40.9: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:20:58.82 +11:37:35.2: 12.21 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:54:42.48 +13:52:02.9: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:47:26.33 +12:16:40.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:47:26.33 +12:16:40.9: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4962 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:44:15.25 +18:50:57.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:20:58.82 +11:37:35.2: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:21:01.03 +11:37:04.8: 12.34 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:58.82 +11:37:35.2: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1451 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:54:42.48 +13:52:02.9: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:42.48 +13:52:02.9: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7194 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:44:15.25 +18:50:57.9: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:44:15.25 +18:50:57.9: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9695 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:21:01.03 +11:37:04.8: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:01.03 +11:37:04.8: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2566 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:08:41.23 +17:23:31.5: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:08:41.23 +17:23:31.5: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:24:33.18 +13:00:12.8: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:41.23 +17:23:31.5: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8175 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:20:41.05 +18:02:26.7: 12.92 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:45:12.31 +12:10:24.1: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 05:55:41.57 +14:12:54.3: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:23.88 +12:58:03.8: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:24:33.18 +13:00:12.8: 12.63 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:33.18 +13:00:12.8: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4073 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:20:41.05 +18:02:26.7: 12.96 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:20:41.05 +18:02:26.7: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6888 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:45:12.31 +12:10:24.1: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:12.31 +12:10:24.1: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8701 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 05:55:41.57 +14:12:54.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:41.57 +14:12:54.3: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9491 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:23.88 +12:58:03.8: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:23.88 +12:58:03.8: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4750 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:17:15.92 +18:41:48.1: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:03:33.46 +18:11:15.8: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:17:15.92 +18:41:48.1: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:42.24 +15:59:21.7: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:03:33.46 +18:11:15.8: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:15.92 +18:41:48.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7699 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:33.46 +18:11:15.8: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0570 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:07:20.16 +16:45:30.5: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:05:08.74 +16:14:35.3: 13.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:32:21.91 +18:48:08.4: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:42.24 +15:59:21.7: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:42.24 +15:59:21.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7019 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:12:28.02 +15:19:57.8: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:07:20.16 +16:45:30.5: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:20.16 +16:45:30.5: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9654 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:05:08.74 +16:14:35.3: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:08.74 +16:14:35.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9234 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:08:14.32 +13:57:02.3: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:06:12.34 +16:29:16.2: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:32:21.91 +18:48:08.4: 15.88 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:12:28.02 +15:19:57.8: 13.46 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:28.02 +15:19:57.8: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9561 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:08:14.32 +13:57:02.3: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:14.32 +13:57:02.3: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9579 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:06:12.34 +16:29:16.2: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:12.34 +16:29:16.2: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0946 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:18:30.44 +15:00:18.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1648 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:13:48.91 +11:33:50.2: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7: 14.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:06:58.00 +11:46:31.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7473 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:13:48.91 +11:33:50.2: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:48.91 +11:33:50.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6219 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:34:00.79 +11:33:25.8: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4231 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6: 14.13 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:19:45.75 +15:53:59.6: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0256 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4: 14.00 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:33:59.93 +15:17:01.9: ref_mag=11.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0841 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.83 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:01:30.75 +14:54:04.4: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.9204 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:34:47.79 +12:41:13.5: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5734 delta=1.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5: 13.86 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-35-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0386.fits at 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:22:48.66 +12:34:02.5: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7866 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_20-37-12_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0042.fits at 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7: 13.81 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:14:06.47 +13:01:14.7: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8107 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out138721.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out144946.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out148908.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out166811.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out170626.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out267564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out70834.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84586.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out92362.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94500.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266158_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266158_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:27.13 +16:09:17.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266167_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266167_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266170_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266170_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266181_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266181_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:21.44 +09:43:24.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266183_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266183_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266184_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266184_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:46.49 +13:18:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266185_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266185_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.59 +11:18:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266188_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266188_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266190_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266190_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266292_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266292_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:55.94 +08:43:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266305_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266305_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:20.20 +08:42:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266327_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266327_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:02.32 +19:13:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266328_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266328_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.70 +19:07:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266399_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266399_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:57.38 +16:35:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266643_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266643_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.78 +17:37:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266654_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266654_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:03.43 +13:50:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266725_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266725_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:34.72 +14:02:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266736_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266736_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:23.64 +14:19:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266751_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266751_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.54 +16:56:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266796_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266796_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:38.84 +15:48:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266830_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266830_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:34.04 +13:46:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266833_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266833_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:53.02 +16:26:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266834_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266834_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:47.78 +16:12:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266896_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266896_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:38.36 +16:26:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266898_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266898_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:24.09 +10:29:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266922_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266922_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.30 +18:40:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266927_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266927_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:23.40 +13:50:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266931_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266931_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:20.10 +11:40:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266938_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266938_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.88 +18:25:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266968_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266968_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266973_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266973_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:54.94 +17:06:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 266987_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 266987_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:31.34 +11:41:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267004_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267004_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:18.71 +17:43:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267036_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267036_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:16.55 +10:33:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267065_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267065_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267071_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267071_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:01.64 +14:10:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267096_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267096_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:51.22 +13:51:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267103_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267103_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267108_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267108_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267110_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267110_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:08.37 +10:34:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267112_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267112_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.04 +18:15:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267121_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267121_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:09.20 +13:52:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267122_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267122_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:43.01 +18:02:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267143_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267143_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.34 +16:57:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267144_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267144_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267150_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267150_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:38.06 +12:33:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267196_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267196_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267212_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267212_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:55.76 +11:31:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267232_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267232_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:04.87 +11:01:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267235_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267235_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267243_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267243_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:39.73 +16:36:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267251_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267251_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:23.14 +10:45:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267270_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267270_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:24.86 +17:53:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267278_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267278_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267279_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267279_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267281_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267281_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267299_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267299_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267315_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267315_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:27.95 +09:37:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267355_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267355_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267361_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267361_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.98 +16:27:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267367_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267367_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:53.08 +14:11:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267370_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267370_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:34.18 +15:33:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267372_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267372_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:20.89 +14:01:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267387_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267387_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267394_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267394_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267404_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267404_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.39 +11:58:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267409_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267409_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:45.56 +16:35:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267425_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267425_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:55.51 +17:12:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267428_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267428_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267443_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267443_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267449_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267449_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:44.08 +12:53:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267466_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267466_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267469_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267469_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:17.85 +14:29:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267484_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267484_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.14 +18:42:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267553_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267553_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:58.53 +10:14:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267564_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 267564_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267580_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267580_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267588_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267588_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267595_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267595_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267607_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267607_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:51.01 +13:03:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 267720_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 267720_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:57.13 +12:23:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158801_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 158801_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:26.66 +12:16:24.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114333_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 114333_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:56.44 +14:12:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21573_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 21573_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:43.78 +18:14:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107835_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 107835_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:16.99 +14:20:27.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 104176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 104176_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:05.74 +14:31:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174423_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 174423_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.09 +11:25:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165169_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 165169_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:46.21 +11:54:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112719_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 112719_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:28.30 +14:10:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178081_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 178081_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:53.76 +11:15:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29203_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 29203_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:57.91 +17:43:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192538_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 192538_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:36:17.10 +10:45:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184758_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 184758_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:52.73 +10:23:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174803_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 174803_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:21.10 +11:26:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119392_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 119392_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:53.38 +13:50:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92362_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 92362_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58839_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 58839_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:42.51 +16:28:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114977_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 114977_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:44.16 +14:01:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82516_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 82516_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.14 +15:24:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53477_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 53477_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:21.27 +16:43:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150105_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 150105_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:56.50 +12:30:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96807_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 96807_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:23.74 +14:45:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124118_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 124118_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:20.97 +13:38:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 209389_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 209389_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:14.65 +09:09:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166811_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 166811_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155639_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 155639_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:19.42 +12:15:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171471_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 171471_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 170626_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 170626_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107662_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 107662_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:05.69 +14:17:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24403_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 24403_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.40 +18:05:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 243979_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 243979_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:48.24 +12:20:28.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198614_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 198614_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:36.35 +11:09:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 164118_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 164118_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:28.03 +11:54:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 137851_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 137851_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:24.55 +13:02:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167402_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 167402_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:46.60 +11:40:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 205235_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 205235_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:34.91 +08:57:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21204_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 21204_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.71 +18:15:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186785_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 186785_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:03.73 +10:31:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87174_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 87174_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:04.94 +15:06:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78240_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 78240_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:25.66 +15:35:26.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185980_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 185980_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:36.69 +10:28:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33322_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 33322_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:18.08 +17:38:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145677_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 145677_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.23 +12:40:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28824_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 28824_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:33.63 +17:50:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217105_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 217105_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:49.69 +09:32:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26621_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 26621_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.68 +17:54:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173160_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 173160_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:59.19 +11:28:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70834_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 70834_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 165625_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 165625_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:20.11 +11:48:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116263_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 116263_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:35.05 +13:58:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40307_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 40307_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:16.13 +17:21:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147876_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 147876_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:03.39 +12:39:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94727_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 94727_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:16.06 +14:53:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 218653_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 218653_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:43.85 +09:35:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84586_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 84586_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21524_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 21524_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:38.98 +18:11:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102507_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 102507_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:57.62 +14:36:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94500_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 94500_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144946_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 144946_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 148908_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 148908_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138721_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
Preparing report for the candidate 138721_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 105146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:37.72 +14:23:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 144640_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 144640_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:35.52 +12:44:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176251_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 176251_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:58.42 +11:20:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105047_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 105047_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:04.10 +14:38:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152021_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 152021_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:44.89 +12:33:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 102755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:28.04 +14:43:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 213932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 213932_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:06.55 +09:56:33.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114108_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 114108_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:36.02 +14:09:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 173146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 173146_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:48.14 +11:32:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 197755_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:41:17.17 +11:00:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217685_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 217685_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:23.19 +09:38:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 225474_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 225474_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:58.59 +09:53:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32882_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 32882_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:24.29 +17:38:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62388_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251
The candidate 62388_fd_Ori-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_04-23-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0251 did not pass the final checks
