This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 12.87 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0
150.11226 2.80111 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 275650146362579072 | 04:17:49.49 +54:23:40.6 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.592+/-0.033 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 275650146362579072,2461277.7671,12.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 275650146362579072 20260825.2671 12.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 12.43 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6
154.25765 2.37066 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 270961863141935616 | 04:34:50.06 +51:07:11.8 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE SpType: M0 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=1.695+/-0.029 (Very red! L if it's a dwarf)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.2671* 04 34 50.18 +51 07 11.6 12.4 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 270961863141935616,2461277.7671,12.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 270961863141935616 20260825.2671 12.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 12.12 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1
155.97674 3.05217 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.9" and 3.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J044515.28+501711.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.331 g Y 0.539 g 2458211.77480 196.642505900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.2671* 04 45 15.03 +50 17 11.1 12.1 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J044515.28+501711.5,2461277.7671,12.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J044515.28+501711.5 20260825.2671 12.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 11.83 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2
153.34993 1.98272 galactic Per Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J042903.61+513103.3
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.120 V 13.390 V 2457701.85900 39.680000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 25.2671* 04 29 03.52 +51 31 04.2 11.8 U Per 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J042903.61+513103.3,2461277.7671,11.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J042903.61+513103.3 20260825.2671 11.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 11.79 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1
153.83925 6.42565 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.6 pix
The object was found in VSX 3" ASASSN-V J045318.63+540450.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.120 g Y 0.180 g 2458800.95500 66.700000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J045318.63+540450.6,2461277.7671,11.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J045318.63+540450.6 20260825.2671 11.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 25.2671 2461277.7671 11.47 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7
153.43012 9.64198 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 2.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 5" ASASSN-V J050935.18+562044.2
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.850 V 13.580 V 2458351.15060 111.503797000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J050935.18+562044.2,2461277.7671,11.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J050935.18+562044.2 20260825.2671 11.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461277.76735532 25.08.2026 06:24:49.500 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16160
Objects passed selection criteria: 16071
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11034
Average stars matched: 10746.5 (97.3944 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 241636 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 01:27:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
First image: 2461093.61077987 22.02.2026 02:39:21.381 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Last image: 2461277.76735532 25.08.2026 06:24:49.500 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 133
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 126641
Objects passed selection criteria: 126242
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 86141
Average stars matched: 82848.5 (96.1778 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 595484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Mon Aug 24 15:05:05 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-195-gae6eb4b1
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-24)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 25 01:29:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461277.76684603
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0131 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AIlsn95vec
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1ivFsc1aTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PaWRZdtHb8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BxdZaJ88BH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.947200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.947200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.7116 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0355 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.7116 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11453 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7219 out of 8021 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8021 out of 17373 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec +47.7027 to +59.3642 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 49.0352 to 78.9610 deg, Dec 47.7027 to 59.3642 deg
Loaded 11464 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7230 out of 8036 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8036 out of 17364 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
2.1 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
3.2 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.3 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.3 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.AIlsn95vec (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1702, bad_region=1, passed=17373
Got 17373 stars (including 15651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17373 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17373 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.564 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.430 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.363 n_q1=1096 n_q2=1175 n_q3=1219 n_q4=1403 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.288
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.1ivFsc1aTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1704, bad_region=0, passed=17364
Got 17364 stars (including 15626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 17364 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4900 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17364 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4900 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4900 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.416 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.432 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1225 n_q4=1409 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.292
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.PaWRZdtHb8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=0, passed=4827
Got 4827 stars (including 4572 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4827 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4486 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4455 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4456 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4455 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4486 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4456 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4456 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4456 stars left (next iteration limit 4900)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4456 robust_rms=9.735 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.041 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4456 robust_rms=0.528 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.630 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4456 robust_rms=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.564 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4456 robust_rms_before=0.858 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.449 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.564 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.564
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.564 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=4456 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.542 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.445 n_q1=1425 n_q2=872 n_q3=1182 n_q4=977 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.218
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.BxdZaJ88BH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=248, bad_region=0, passed=4891
Got 4891 stars (including 4636 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4891 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4551 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4518 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4518 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.9 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4550 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4516 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4516 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4516 stars left (next iteration limit 4969)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4516 robust_rms=9.822 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.312 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4516 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4516 robust_rms=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4516 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.448 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.425 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.571 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.534
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.571 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=4516 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.492 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.552 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.361 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1423 n_q2=881 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1003 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits sigma_overall=0.438 worst_q_ratio=1.288
ref2=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits sigma_overall=0.425 worst_q_ratio=1.292
new1=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits sigma_overall=0.445 worst_q_ratio=1.218
new2=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits sigma_overall=0.449 worst_q_ratio=1.228
reference average sigma_overall=0.4315 worst_q_ratio=1.29
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047_astrometric_residuals.png (4900 matched stars from wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076_astrometric_residuals.png (4456 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077_astrometric_residuals.png (4516 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0168 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:14:08.869 +53:59:58.47
Second-epoch image center 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0131 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:14:07.919 +53:58:58.55
Second-epoch second image center 04:14:08.736 +53:59:11.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00411 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q3nvCw8Wsf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7P9xLkH3S1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pnRS3WOtCM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OqjZZgtZg2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits and wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.799000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.799000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 140708 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3756 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9404 to 78.9609 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3756 deg
Loaded 11511 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5993 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140708 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 140191 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec +47.6949 to +59.3671 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 48.9776 to 78.9637 deg, Dec 47.6949 to 59.3671 deg
Loaded 11495 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6007 out of 8204 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8204 out of 140191 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 128 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
1.9 pix Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
3.0 pix fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.q3nvCw8Wsf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=49, blended=14794, bad_region=2, passed=140659
Got 140659 stars (including 125608 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140659 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140659 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.423 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.405 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.358 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1214 n_q4=1445 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.7P9xLkH3S1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=14593, bad_region=1, passed=140144
Got 140144 stars (including 125314 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 140144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4904 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 140144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4904 stars left (next iteration limit 5392)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits N_match=4904 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.410 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.347 n_q1=1087 n_q2=1183 n_q3=1200 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits -region wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.pnRS3WOtCM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=1169, bad_region=0, passed=32888
Got 32888 stars (including 31661 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32888 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 689 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4872 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4905 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=9.195 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.796 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.629 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.574 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.860 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.455 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.564 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.574
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.564 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.538 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.435 n_q1=1527 n_q2=943 n_q3=1362 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.184
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
############ /tmp/tmp.OqjZZgtZg2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1167, bad_region=1, passed=33367
Got 33367 stars (including 32139 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4907 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.8 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4906 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=9.258 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.370 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.510 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.576 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.528 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=0.883 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.457 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.569 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.528
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.569 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1520 n_q2=951 n_q3=1359 n_q4=1045 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.203
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
FORCED_PHOTOMETRY_CALIBRATION_METHOD=tycho2 - not using remote photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0076.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-25_CI_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_012535_TTUQ1b1x1_2925425_qWxHWsb1/wcs_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-11-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:36:05.86 +58:44:11.4: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:52:53.61 +53:55:52.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:35:13.27 +57:25:23.9: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:40:43.09 +58:13:28.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:52:53.61 +53:55:52.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:36:05.86 +58:44:11.4: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:52:53.61 +53:55:52.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5632 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:36:05.86 +58:44:11.4: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0070 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:49:18.41 +52:39:29.7: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:35:13.27 +57:25:23.9: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.32 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:35:13.27 +57:25:23.9: ref_mag=12.32 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2877 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 03:57:56.61 +52:06:44.4: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:26:53.21 +51:59:00.0: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:40:43.09 +58:13:28.7: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:40:43.09 +58:13:28.7: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7424 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:49:18.41 +52:39:29.7: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:18.41 +52:39:29.7: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7309 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 03:57:56.61 +52:06:44.4: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.73 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:57:56.61 +52:06:44.4: ref_mag=12.73 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5733 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:24:10.58 +53:30:24.8: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:26:53.21 +51:59:00.0: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:26:53.21 +51:59:00.0: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5261 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:24:10.58 +53:30:24.8: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.45 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:24:10.58 +53:30:24.8: ref_mag=12.45 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4983 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:17:49.60 +54:23:41.0: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8646 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:34:50.18 +51:07:11.6: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4184 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:45:15.03 +50:17:11.1: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0643 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:29:03.52 +51:31:04.2: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8281 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 04:37:06.57 +49:31:54.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-39-21_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0046.fits at 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 04:53:18.32 +54:04:50.1: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7924 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 04:37:06.57 +49:31:54.7: 11.79 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-40-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0047.fits at 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:37:06.57 +49:31:54.7: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4475 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:09:34.56 +56:20:43.7: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4752 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out119942.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20367.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out57132.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out62495.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97073.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out97578.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 47s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163544_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163546_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163546_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:05.41 +50:18:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163548_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163549_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163549_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163562_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163569_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163582_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163582_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163591_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163591_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163599_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163599_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:20.33 +53:27:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163600_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163601_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163601_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163640_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163640_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:03.34 +56:19:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163641_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163641_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163651_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163651_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:55.41 +58:31:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163652_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163652_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:44.15 +49:51:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163658_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163658_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163670_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163670_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:28:12.41 +49:03:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163682_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163682_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163689_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:19:05.44 +56:55:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163694_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163694_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:43.28 +50:40:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163696_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163696_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163698_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:45.37 +51:10:50.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163705_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163705_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:04.05 +52:35:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163714_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163714_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:23:48.04 +54:34:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163726_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163726_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:33.57 +51:41:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163727_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163727_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:02.03 +51:42:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163728_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163728_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163736_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163736_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163739_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163739_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:08.45 +57:55:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163741_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163741_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163742_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:25.12 +56:31:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163747_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163747_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:27.79 +51:12:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163750_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163750_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:46:12.90 +51:33:24.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163751_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163751_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163788_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163788_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163793_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163793_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:11.48 +56:29:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163814_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 163814_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11923_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 11923_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:44:42.12 +58:23:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50424_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 50424_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:02.26 +55:26:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62495_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 62495_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 140170_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:11.05 +49:01:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 121139_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:55:51.61 +51:05:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16332_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 16332_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:46.05 +57:49:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76198_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76198_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:42.98 +53:20:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 48634_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:58:35.80 +55:41:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 126063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:54:21.70 +51:28:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 48666_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:52.41 +55:33:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 78328_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:47.23 +52:50:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 32063_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:10.29 +56:41:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79800_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:21.97 +53:06:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 77810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:20.59 +52:48:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44816_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 44816_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:50.30 +55:22:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 103927_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:35.23 +49:37:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152716_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 152716_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:47:15.58 +56:28:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 128522_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:28.67 +51:18:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 76132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:27.09 +52:56:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98215_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 98215_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:46.52 +51:24:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 114547_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:12.71 +50:34:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 126693_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 126693_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:33.62 +51:09:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134862_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 134862_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:06.80 +51:46:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 86416_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:45:47.92 +52:38:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 26662_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:57.63 +57:16:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 77935_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:17.02 +52:52:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07179_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 07179_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:58.23 +58:17:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 46274_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:49.04 +54:53:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 67230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:18.22 +54:02:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49067_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 49067_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 109018_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:26.16 +49:58:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 42501_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:46.55 +55:55:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 113147_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:35:33.51 +50:25:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24361_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 24361_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:37.45 +56:02:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 68775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 68775_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:44.08 +53:29:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97073_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 97073_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 116325_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:53:15.50 +50:43:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 112826_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:06.93 +50:17:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 49622_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:32.42 +54:40:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 48433_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:26.52 +54:36:49.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 113617_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:28.73 +50:14:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29989_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 29989_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:13.73 +56:08:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119942_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 119942_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 107066_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:05.22 +50:00:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 56527_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:49.16 +54:24:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10309_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 10309_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:01.91 +57:44:26.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 131821_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:31.56 +51:45:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 63553_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:44.50 +53:53:04.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97578_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 97578_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 31967_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:37.68 +56:40:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 25829_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:50.66 +56:10:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 57132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 57132_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 79941_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:47.26 +53:00:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 54762_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:25.14 +54:28:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 129439_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:08:03.22 +51:41:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
Preparing report for the candidate 20367_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 107197_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 107197_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 19552_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:33.77 +57:24:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64305_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64305_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:09.42 +54:14:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 83229_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:07.69 +52:24:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 110200_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:34.65 +50:15:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29939_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 29939_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:50:36.68 +57:02:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 100536_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:02:56.95 +49:18:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 64230_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:39.15 +54:08:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124113_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 124113_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:37.45 +51:05:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 130337_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:45.15 +51:43:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 14434_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:59:16.49 +58:13:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11332_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 11332_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:55.96 +57:48:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 22810_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.02 +57:20:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 95702_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123867_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 123867_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116019_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 116019_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:55.02 +50:22:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 124454_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:30:44.88 +51:13:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 135481_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:32.72 +51:45:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80326_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 80326_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:15:12.45 +52:55:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 85971_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:43:27.78 +52:39:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 118479_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:14.85 +49:54:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 116731_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:33.19 +50:37:35.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 94722_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:56.16 +49:53:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 117875_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:48:39.03 +50:50:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 31567_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:58.72 +56:41:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49794_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 49794_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:36.67 +55:25:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 86459_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:42:59.34 +52:37:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 67228_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:57.70 +53:28:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 111932_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:18:14.60 +50:17:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 71960_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:54.16 +53:04:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115129_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 115129_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:21.35 +49:58:25.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 56769_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:16.88 +53:45:05.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 92234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077
The candidate 92234_fd_Cam-11-Q1b1x1_2026-08-25_01-24-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0077 did not pass the final checks
