This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 11.46 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5
41.50393 -33.45719 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 10.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.389 Industria -0 0 0 11.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5: 15.23 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7203,11.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2203 11.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 12.82 20:40:43.27 -08:59:00.2
37.34638 -28.33789 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 10.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.490 Veritas -1 -0 1 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:43.27 -08:59:00.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:43.27 -08:59:00.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7203,12.82,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2203 12.82CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 12.93 21:03:38.28 -12:20:37.0
36.61273 -34.86403 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.38 Leda 0 -0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:38.28 -12:20:37.0: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:38.28 -12:20:37.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7203,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2203 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 13.18 20:06:11.46 -04:54:09.9
37.14397 -18.85028 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 10.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.273 Atropos -1 1 2 13.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:06:11.46 -04:54:09.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:06:11.46 -04:54:09.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7203,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2203 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 13.35 20:08:32.18 -12:06:34.1
30.47925 -22.51348 galactic Cap Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.7" and 10.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1058 Grubba -2 0 2 13.6 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:08:32.18 -12:06:34.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:08:32.18 -12:06:34.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 24.2203* 20 08 32.18 -12 06 34.1 13.3 U Cap 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461276.7203,13.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260824.2203 13.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 13.09 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0
40.00461 -24.84451 galactic Aql Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 10.2 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" V0837 Aql
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
10.400 V < 15.500 V 2452058.00000 196.700000000000 Me
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0837 Aql,2461276.7203,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0837 Aql 20260824.2203 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 24.2203 2461276.7203 13.13 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3
33.07127 -29.99479 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.7 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" WZ Aqr
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.100 V 14.300 V 2453511.85400 0.494267700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
WZ Aqr,2461276.7203,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
WZ Aqr 20260824.2203 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461276.72075613 24.08.2026 05:17:43.330 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13599
Objects passed selection criteria: 13530
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9866.25
Average stars matched: 9631 (97.6156 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 239224 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 00:51:03 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
First image: 2461241.82588149 20.07.2026 07:49:06.161 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Last image: 2461276.72075613 24.08.2026 05:17:43.330 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 47
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 87508
Objects passed selection criteria: 87364
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 70304.8
Average stars matched: 68129 (96.9053 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 573720 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 24 00:52:17 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461276.71979075
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0919 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01640 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.L7TXJM9F7m
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.TbdGjqHKmk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eXAchF4Kcb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nsbpCs2gOH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.97
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2012 to 316.7417 deg, Dec -15.5581 to -4.2220 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7857 out of 8140 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8140 out of 14476 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.2013 to 316.7416 deg, Dec -15.5578 to -4.2219 deg
Loaded 10223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7839 out of 8130 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8130 out of 14495 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.6 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.4 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.0 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.L7TXJM9F7m (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=755, bad_region=0, passed=14476
Got 14476 stars (including 13702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14476 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14476 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.220 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.277 n_q1=1163 n_q2=1365 n_q3=1107 n_q4=1240 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.TbdGjqHKmk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=763, bad_region=0, passed=14495
Got 14495 stars (including 13716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4874 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14495 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4874 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4874 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1171 n_q2=1357 n_q3=1105 n_q4=1241 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eXAchF4Kcb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=402, bad_region=0, passed=5393
Got 5393 stars (including 4985 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5393 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4862 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4862 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5393 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4862 stars left (next iteration limit 5348)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=10.932 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.860 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.364 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4862 robust_rms=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4862 robust_rms_before=0.762 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.294 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.275 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.314 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.314 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4862 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1343 n_q3=1112 n_q4=1267 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.098
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nsbpCs2gOH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=406, bad_region=0, passed=5367
Got 5367 stars (including 4953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4829 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4830 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5367 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4830 stars left (next iteration limit 5311)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=10.744 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.242 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.382 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.403 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4830 robust_rms=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.305 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4830 robust_rms_before=0.773 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.295 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.279 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.311 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.305
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.311 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4830 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.250 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1130 n_q2=1347 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1256 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.137
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.134
ref2=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits sigma_overall=0.287 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.098
new2=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.137
reference average sigma_overall=0.281 worst_q_ratio=1.1375
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234_astrometric_residuals.png (4875 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235_astrometric_residuals.png (4874 matched stars from wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.26 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188_astrometric_residuals.png (4862 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189_astrometric_residuals.png (4830 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20912_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.55 -13:15:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20917_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 20917_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.06 -06:09:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 02172_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 21:02:32.63 -06:36:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 04121_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.34 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Image size: 941.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Image size: 941.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Image size: 941.1'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 20:34:16.286 -09:58:34.63
Second-epoch image center 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0919 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 20:34:27.782 -10:03:17.57
Second-epoch second image center 20:34:31.047 -10:02:43.52
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01640 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZBUOYPHfA2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mSboVIp8XC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VA5yk60auI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZIaLmnUU1y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits and wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.648000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.648000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.13
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 95426 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1405 to 316.7614 deg, Dec -15.5975 to -4.1906 deg
Loaded 10309 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7294 out of 8388 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8388 out of 95426 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (aperture=5.1)
Read 95800 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 300.1479 to 316.7695 deg, Dec -15.5883 to -4.1862 deg
Loaded 10308 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7289 out of 8389 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8389 out of 95800 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 46 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
2.5 pix Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
2.3 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
15.1 mag. Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ZBUOYPHfA2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=6181, bad_region=13, passed=95412
Got 95412 stars (including 89061 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.299 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.223 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.287 n_q1=1203 n_q2=1306 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1242 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mSboVIp8XC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits 572.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits' -> 'wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=6280, bad_region=13, passed=95780
Got 95780 stars (including 89335 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 95780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 95780 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.296 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.226 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1213 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1245 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits -region wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VA5yk60auI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1534, bad_region=0, passed=45433
Got 45433 stars (including 43829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 45433 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4901 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4878 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 45433 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4878 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=10.431 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.319 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4878 robust_rms=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.294 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4878 robust_rms_before=0.762 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.280 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.269 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.302 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.294
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.302 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits N_match=4878 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1193 n_q2=1370 n_q3=1112 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZIaLmnUU1y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1581, bad_region=0, passed=46420
Got 46420 stars (including 44763 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46420 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013071 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010457 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4877 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4877 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.7 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4879 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 46420 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4879 stars left (next iteration limit 5364)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=10.294 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.447 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.394 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4879 robust_rms=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.299 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4879 robust_rms_before=0.769 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.286 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.273 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.313 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.299
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.313 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits N_match=4879 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.241 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1373 n_q3=1102 n_q4=1205 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-16-19_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0188.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-24_CI_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_004538_TTUQ1b1x1_2425788_UeG8Zow2/wcs_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cap-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:11:59.48 -05:25:30.9: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:43:24.40 -06:22:29.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:19.96 -14:23:09.4: 12.70 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:17:00.81 -12:35:13.6: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:36:17.55 -14:34:15.1: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:24:07.36 -05:18:44.1: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:12.52 -08:35:30.2: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:20:45.81 -07:45:59.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.9: 10.42 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:36:17.55 -14:34:15.1: 12.08 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:43:24.40 -06:22:29.1: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:11:59.48 -05:25:30.9: 13.37 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:17:00.81 -12:35:13.6: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.50 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:11:59.48 -05:25:30.9: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6561 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:36:17.55 -14:34:15.1: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1321 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:43:24.40 -06:22:29.1: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9531 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:17:00.81 -12:35:13.6: ref_mag=12.50 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7627 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:12.52 -08:35:30.2: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:40:12.52 -08:35:30.2: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4803 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:19.96 -14:23:09.4: 12.73 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:24:07.36 -05:18:44.1: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.21 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:19.96 -14:23:09.4: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7989 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:20:45.81 -07:45:59.3: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:24:07.36 -05:18:44.1: ref_mag=12.21 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5309 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:20:45.81 -07:45:59.3: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9874 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5: 15.23 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.9: 10.36 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.39 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.23 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:53:47.89 -07:47:31.9: ref_mag=10.39 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.6001 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 21:05:41.62 -08:05:21.5: ref_mag=15.23 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=11.4625 delta=3.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:35.4: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 21:03:38.28 -12:20:37.0: 15.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:43.27 -08:59:00.2: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:06:11.46 -04:54:09.9: 15.54 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:15:20.48 -05:31:11.9: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:35.4: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:09.5: 12.92 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:27:53.62 -05:39:35.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5077 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 21:03:38.28 -12:20:37.0: 15.38 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:43.27 -08:59:00.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:08:32.18 -12:06:34.1: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:19.7: 13.61 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:35:28.06 -12:56:35.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:06:11.46 -04:54:09.9: 15.57 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:15:20.48 -05:31:11.9: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:15:20.48 -05:31:11.9: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2539 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:09.5: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:14:59.56 -04:36:09.5: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0218 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:08:32.18 -12:06:34.1: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:35:28.06 -12:56:35.8: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:19.7: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:35:28.06 -12:56:35.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3860 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:28.60 -06:46:19.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4468 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:16:00.18 -07:35:44.9: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:16:00.18 -07:35:44.9: 13.49 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:38:46.46 -12:45:34.4: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:16:00.18 -07:35:44.9: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4710 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:34:29.05 -05:51:00.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:37:33.66 -06:24:36.1: 13.74 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.0: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:38:46.46 -12:45:34.4: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:38:46.46 -12:45:34.4: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4700 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:34:29.05 -05:51:00.0: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.0: 13.90 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:37:33.66 -06:24:36.1: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:34:29.05 -05:51:00.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5872 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:37:33.66 -06:24:36.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7098 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:23:58.15 -06:06:23.0: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8176 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:41:50.32 -10:57:27.5: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:41:50.32 -10:57:27.5: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 20:41:50.32 -10:57:27.5: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7276 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0: 14.16 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-06_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0234.fits at 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3: 14.08 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0: 14.03 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:32:28.25 -05:17:13.0: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.0829 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-07-20_02-49-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0235.fits at 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3: 14.16 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 20:40:24.14 -13:03:59.3: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.1187 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out06265.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113681.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113802.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113820.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113846.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out113888.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out80289.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113584_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113584_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113589_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113593_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113593_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113594_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113594_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113596_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:51.00 -08:29:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113599_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113599_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:10:46.30 -11:16:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113600_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113607_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113607_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113609_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113611_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113612_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113612_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 113681_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113697_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:52:40.65 -08:56:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113731_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:03.66 -12:35:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113760_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113780_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113780_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:12:19.96 -12:37:02.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113788_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113788_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:06.13 -12:35:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113800_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:18:09.58 -12:35:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113802_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 113802_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113820_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 113820_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113834_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113834_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:17:46.96 -12:30:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113838_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113838_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:47:47.42 -09:28:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113846_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 113846_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113854_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113854_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113857_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113857_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:39.16 -07:01:34.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113882_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 113888_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113910_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113916_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113916_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113927_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113952_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113952_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:44:54.00 -07:43:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113954_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113954_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113957_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113957_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113967_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113967_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113979_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113979_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113984_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 113984_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 17844_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:15:11.08 -06:09:04.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 25145_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:59:00.64 -07:32:30.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 06265_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 71630_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:07:16.55 -13:15:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80289_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
Preparing report for the candidate 80289_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 76713_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:08:01.84 -12:46:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 71908_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:11:03.30 -13:18:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 66789_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:48:08.55 -14:47:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 28791_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 20:22:13.34 -07:21:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189
The candidate 14891_fd_Cap-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-24_00-17-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0189 did not pass the final checks
