This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 23.4792 2461275.9792 9.06 06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5
188.82252 2.67382 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 -0 1 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,9.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 9.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,7.79,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 7.79CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 23.4792 2461275.9792 11.13 06:37:29.08 +22:43:16.5
191.07296 7.24856 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:29.08 +22:43:16.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:29.08 +22:43:16.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,11.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 11.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 23.4792 2461275.9792 12.10 06:00:35.39 +24:26:36.1
185.56788 0.59553 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -0 -0 0 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:35.39 +24:26:36.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:35.39 +24:26:36.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 23.4792* 06 00 35.39 +24 26 36.1 12.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 23.4792 2461275.9792 13.18 06:28:33.72 +18:59:23.2
193.46506 3.69911 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 8.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 1 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:33.72 +18:59:23.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:33.72 +18:59:23.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,13.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 13.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 23.4792 2461275.9792 11.87 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4
190.02466 8.89853 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 9.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -1 0 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461275.9792,11.87,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260823.4792 11.87CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461275.97947096 23.08.2026 11:30:16.291 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27449
Objects passed selection criteria: 27367
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 18508.2
Average stars matched: 17419.5 (94.1175 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 252236 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 23 06:42:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461275.97947096 23.08.2026 11:30:16.291 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 78
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 45 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 175570
Objects passed selection criteria: 175155
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 125475
Average stars matched: 121452 (96.794 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 577220 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Aug 23 06:45:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461275.97888192
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.857 +21:57:34.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.857 +21:57:34.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0536 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.397 +21:56:52.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.397 +21:56:52.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0616 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:45.857 +21:57:34.31
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:43.397 +21:56:52.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6BTkJJXT6q
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sTi9r7E5X5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vcTQjsEek0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2D7ZNXJe2l
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.3 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
13.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 (SNR ) 10.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.6BTkJJXT6q (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sTi9r7E5X5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vcTQjsEek0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=669, bad_region=0, passed=7088
Got 7088 stars (including 6413 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7088 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4869 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7088 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4808 stars left (next iteration limit 5287)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=9.433 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4808 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4808 robust_rms_before=0.841 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.481 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.401
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.857 +21:57:33.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 7088 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2547498.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.841 -> 0.317 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=4808 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.418 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1103 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.246
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2D7ZNXJe2l (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=698, bad_region=0, passed=6517
Got 6517 stars (including 5811 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6517 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4871 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6517 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=9.506 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.553 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.401 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=0.853 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.387 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.317 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.482 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.401
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.400 +21:56:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 6517 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2547481.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.853 -> 0.317 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.334 n_q1=1279 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1297 n_q4=1112 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits sigma_overall=0.336 worst_q_ratio=1.246
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.251
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295_astrometric_residuals.png (4808 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296_astrometric_residuals.png (4807 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34184.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 85s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 34167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34184_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 34184_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 87s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:15:24.38 +22:36:27.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.857 +21:57:33.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.857 +21:57:33.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0538 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.400 +21:56:51.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.400 +21:56:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0618 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:45.857 +21:57:33.55
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:43.400 +21:56:51.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01497 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DzCQfkZHdM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hlkq0eQxqb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lHPmtDQoVo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A2w8JEYiE5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 72 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.5 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
13.4 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 12.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DzCQfkZHdM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hlkq0eQxqb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lHPmtDQoVo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=2649, bad_region=0, passed=56334
Got 56334 stars (including 53607 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56334 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56334 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=9.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.905 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4816 robust_rms=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4816 robust_rms_before=0.318 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.383 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.318 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.394 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.394 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.379 n_q1=1274 n_q2=1090 n_q3=1321 n_q4=1131 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.A2w8JEYiE5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=2350, bad_region=0, passed=53213
Got 53213 stars (including 50804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53213 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 53213 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4807 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=9.248 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4807 robust_rms=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.406 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4807 robust_rms_before=0.316 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.395 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.316 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.400 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.406
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.400 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits N_match=4807 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1084 n_q3=1312 n_q4=1136 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-29-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0295.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-23_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_063143_TTUQ1b1x1_934879_XaknbcKa/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:29.53 +24:04:26.5: 12.65 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:49.53 +23:57:21.5: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:16.30 +21:11:01.1: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:59.49 +22:21:52.0: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.48 +23:55:55.7: 12.15 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:48.16 +25:13:33.2: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:49:02.99 +25:11:39.5: 12.20 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:59.27 +17:48:23.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:49.53 +23:57:21.5: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.48 +23:55:55.7: 12.09 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:45.17 +24:10:00.1: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:16.30 +21:11:01.1: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:48.16 +25:13:33.2: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.48 +23:55:55.7: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3404 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:49.53 +23:57:21.5: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9327 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:29.53 +24:04:26.5: 12.47 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:16.30 +21:11:01.1: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3135 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:48.16 +25:13:33.2: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7113 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:29.53 +24:04:26.5: ref_mag=12.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.7995 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:59.49 +22:21:52.0: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:59.49 +22:21:52.0: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1581 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:49:02.99 +25:11:39.5: 12.05 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.12 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:49:02.99 +25:11:39.5: ref_mag=12.12 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2979 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:59.27 +17:48:23.8: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:59.27 +17:48:23.8: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3317 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:45.17 +24:10:00.1: 12.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:45.17 +24:10:00.1: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2599 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.9: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:51:52.70 +22:42:48.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:03.57 +23:20:13.5: 10.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:51:52.70 +22:42:48.9: 11.64 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:52.70 +22:42:48.9: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9027 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:29.08 +22:43:16.5: 15.62 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.9: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.76 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.55 +23:20:54.9: ref_mag=11.76 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8840 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:03.57 +23:20:13.5: 10.83 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:03.57 +23:20:13.5: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9767 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:16.8: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:29.08 +22:43:16.5: 15.61 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:35.39 +24:26:36.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:01.52 +20:10:36.6: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:16.8: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.63 +20:16:16.8: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5186 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:02.95 +23:18:02.6: 12.02 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:35.39 +24:26:36.1: 15.66 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.11 +20:11:42.6: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:01.52 +20:10:36.6: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.68 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:01.52 +20:10:36.6: ref_mag=11.68 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6526 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:02.95 +23:18:02.6: 12.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:02.95 +23:18:02.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1023 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.11 +20:11:42.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:59.61 +26:00:21.4: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.11 +20:11:42.6: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8316 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:51.10 +20:48:17.7: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:10:59.61 +26:00:21.4: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.35 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:59.61 +26:00:21.4: ref_mag=12.35 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4041 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:51.10 +20:48:17.7: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.24 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:51.10 +20:48:17.7: ref_mag=12.24 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4000 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:57.77 +23:16:59.4: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:15.86 +18:41:46.9: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:50.84 +23:31:39.0: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:48.07 +24:04:00.4: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:26.61 +20:55:18.8: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.6: 12.41 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:57.77 +23:16:59.4: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:57.77 +23:16:59.4: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5319 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:15.86 +18:41:46.9: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:50.84 +23:31:39.0: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:15.86 +18:41:46.9: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6637 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:50.84 +23:31:39.0: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7965 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:48.07 +24:04:00.4: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:48.07 +24:04:00.4: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8064 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:49.45 +19:19:42.6: 12.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:26.61 +20:55:18.8: 12.68 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:26.61 +20:55:18.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7781 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:56.74 +25:01:33.1: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.6: 12.27 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:38:49.40 +21:52:44.6: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5519 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:13:49.45 +19:19:42.6: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:13:49.45 +19:19:42.6: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7782 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:56.74 +25:01:33.1: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.67 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:56.74 +25:01:33.1: ref_mag=12.67 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7409 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:26.16 +20:55:46.2: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:26.16 +20:55:46.2: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:11:40.19 +25:01:56.1: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:18.48 +22:44:29.3: 13.10 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:26.16 +20:55:46.2: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8329 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:46.07 +22:43:14.6: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:33.72 +18:59:23.2: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:11:40.19 +25:01:56.1: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:18.48 +22:44:29.3: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.11 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:11:40.19 +25:01:56.1: ref_mag=13.11 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9985 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:18.48 +22:44:29.3: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1269 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:46.07 +22:43:14.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:46.07 +22:43:14.6: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1110 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:33.72 +18:59:23.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4: 14.38 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4: 14.30 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:41:57.20 +24:22:47.4: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=11.8646 delta=2.47 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out149122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231044.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 87s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230758_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230758_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:49.85 +23:53:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.62 +18:39:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230788_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:18.31 +22:18:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230792_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230794_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:17.83 +18:59:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230799_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230800_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230800_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230801_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230801_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:24.67 +22:16:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230807_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.20 +23:55:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230811_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.23 +17:47:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.51 +25:34:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230816_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.49 +26:33:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.51 +18:25:29.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 230825_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230840_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:24.39 +22:36:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230984_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230984_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230996_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 230996_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.54 +22:29:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231007_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.83 +22:30:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231044_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 231044_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231112_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231112_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.67 +24:02:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231145_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231145_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.17 +22:21:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231170_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231170_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231207_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231207_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231299_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 231299_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231307_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231307_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.28 +22:32:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231317_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231317_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.91 +25:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231371_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231371_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231376_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231376_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231381_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231381_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:42:18.72 +17:38:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231395_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231395_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.34 +23:18:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231416_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231416_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:04.51 +16:56:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231474_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231512_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231512_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.52 +21:37:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231514_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231514_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:15.99 +21:51:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231611_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231611_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.66 +23:13:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231626_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231626_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:46.03 +21:04:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231654_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231654_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.16 +25:00:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231656_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231656_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231663_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231663_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231704_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.25 +21:52:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231721_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231721_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231751_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231751_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231772_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231772_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.95 +24:26:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231804_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231804_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231883_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231883_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231906_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231906_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.37 +16:57:22.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231917_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231917_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.50 +23:37:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.44 +22:41:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231957_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 231957_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:21.72 +18:14:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232105_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 232105_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 232135_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232148_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 232148_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.54 +24:36:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232151_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
Preparing report for the candidate 232151_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.61 +20:02:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.67 +18:15:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-23_06-30-16_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0296 did not pass the final checks
