This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4647 2461274.9647 12.09 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9
154.69905 53.98560 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.5" and 0.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.4647* 10 42 42.90 +54 27 46.9 12.1 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.9647,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.4647 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4647 2461274.9647 12.40 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2
162.87807 52.90093 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 0.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.4647* 10 20 10.15 +50 49 41.2 12.4 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.9647,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.4647 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4647 2461274.9647 12.32 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8
155.81406 43.67368 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.3" and 1.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.691+/-0.025 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.4647* 09 34 11.37 +58 48 39.8 12.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.9647,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.4647 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.4647 2461274.9647 12.29 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2
163.67837 43.65929 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.400+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.4647* 09 22 05.73 +53 22 43.2 12.3 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.9647,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.4647 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461274.96489654 22.08.2026 11:09:17.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8005
Objects passed selection criteria: 7938
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4720.25
Average stars matched: 4604.5 (97.5478 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234324 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 06:12:14 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
First image: 2461093.77794983 22.02.2026 06:40:04.865 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Last image: 2461274.96489654 22.08.2026 11:09:17.061 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 55
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40227
Objects passed selection criteria: 40063
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 24733.5
Average stars matched: 23914 (96.6867 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 263152 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 06:12:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.96442706
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00173 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8rcqSNVfj0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d9z7PWoEaK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.URt8BTUXMl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.OTBOMLsOTq
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.923200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.923200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.46
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6702 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8942 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6702 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4181 out of 4402 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4402 out of 8427 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3304 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.8795 to 163.5542 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3304 deg
Loaded 6199 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4177 out of 4398 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4398 out of 8505 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.2 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.9 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
2.8 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
12.2 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
12.3 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.2 (SNR ) 10.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.8rcqSNVfj0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, bad_region=0, passed=8427
Got 8427 stars (including 7865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4918 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8427 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1117 n_q2=1329 n_q3=1122 n_q4=1342 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.d9z7PWoEaK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=566, bad_region=0, passed=8505
Got 8505 stars (including 7931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8505 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4917 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8505 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5402)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.342 n_q1=1122 n_q2=1340 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1336 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.248
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.URt8BTUXMl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=52, bad_region=0, passed=1023
Got 1023 stars (including 968 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1023 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 693 to 748 (Dec 48.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 913 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 940 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 992 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 693 to 748 (Dec 48.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 941 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 993 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 941 catalog matches do not cover the frame (390/40/340/171 per quadrant, need 58 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=941 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.449 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.577 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.481 n_q1=390 n_q2=40 n_q3=340 n_q4=171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.402
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.OTBOMLsOTq (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=55, bad_region=0, passed=1033
Got 1033 stars (including 976 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 1033 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 693 to 748 (Dec 48.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 925 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 948 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1007 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 693 to 748 (Dec 48.6 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 949 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1006 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1042)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: the 949 catalog matches do not cover the frame (389/40/351/169 per quadrant, need 59 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits N_match=949 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.548 n_q1=389 n_q2=40 n_q3=351 n_q4=169 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.420
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.322
ref2=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.248
new1=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits sigma_overall=0.411 worst_q_ratio=1.402
new2=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits sigma_overall=0.437 worst_q_ratio=1.420
reference average sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.285
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220_astrometric_residuals.png (941 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221_astrometric_residuals.png (949 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Image size: 944.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0411 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Image size: 944.2'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:52:59.679 +53:58:44.09
Second-epoch image center 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0403 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:53:08.044 +54:00:52.51
Second-epoch second image center 09:53:08.393 +54:00:47.08
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00173 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rivk3cBQZ4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LX9lsJmPM4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ogHSfPrzEW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2N37YQKkqK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits and wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.812300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.812300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.20
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 43398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec +47.6475 to +59.3560 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7292 to 163.6375 deg, Dec 47.6475 to 59.3560 deg
Loaded 6260 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3921 out of 4423 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4423 out of 43398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 43456 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec +47.6703 to +59.3417 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 133.7302 to 163.6373 deg, Dec 47.6703 to 59.3417 deg
Loaded 6244 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3916 out of 4420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4420 out of 43456 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (aperture=5.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 51 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
2.1 pix UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
2.7 pix fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
15.6 mag. UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
12.9 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
12.8 mag. fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.rivk3cBQZ4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=2121, bad_region=10, passed=43375
Got 43375 stars (including 41171 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43375 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.6 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4919 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43375 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.318 n_q1=1115 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1125 n_q4=1351 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.277
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LX9lsJmPM4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=2172, bad_region=13, passed=43430
Got 43430 stars (including 41162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 43430 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 688 to 748 (Dec 47.7 to 59.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4916 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 43430 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.319 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1334 n_q3=1128 n_q4=1344 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.290
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits -region wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ogHSfPrzEW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=265, bad_region=12, passed=6587
Got 6587 stars (including 6299 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6587 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013115 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010492 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4788 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6553 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4786 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.78"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4774 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6554 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Excluding outliers - 4774 stars left (next iteration limit 5251)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 4774 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1765/194/1996/819 per quadrant, need 298 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits N_match=4774 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.742 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.828 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.976 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.715 n_q1=1765 n_q2=194 n_q3=1996 n_q4=819 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.315
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2N37YQKkqK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=116, bad_region=12, passed=6343
Got 6343 stars (including 6204 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6343 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013114 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010491 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4837 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6306 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.73"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 690 to 748 (Dec 48.1 to 59.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6304 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.75"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4835 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6302 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Excluding outliers - 4835 stars left (next iteration limit 5320)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: the 4835 catalog matches do not cover the frame (1784/189/2027/835 per quadrant, need 302 in each) - keeping the original solution
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits N_match=4835 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.706 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.763 sigma_q2_arcsec=1.044 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.629 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.727 n_q1=1784 n_q2=189 n_q3=2027 n_q4=835 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.478
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-08-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0220.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_061000_TTUQ1b1x1_3501944_EfMmjeIU/wcs_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:14:18.34 +52:40:56.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:14:18.34 +52:40:56.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:14:18.34 +52:40:56.8: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2: 16.18 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2: 13.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-04_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0286.fits at 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 10:42:42.90 +54:27:46.9: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 10:20:10.15 +50:49:41.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-40-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0287.fits at 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:22:05.73 +53:22:43.2: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2524 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 09:34:11.37 +58:48:39.8: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3288 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24934.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53228.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53245.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 156s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52985_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52985_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52988_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52988_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52989_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52990_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52990_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52991_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52991_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52992_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52992_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52993_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52996_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52996_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52997_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 52999_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53002_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53002_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53005_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53006_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53008_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53009_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53009_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53010_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53011_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53011_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53014_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53016_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53018_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53019_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53027_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53029_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53031_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53048_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53062_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53064_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53066_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53079_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53085_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53122_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53122_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53131_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53131_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53137_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53137_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53143_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53143_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53148_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53148_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53151_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53151_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53161_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53163_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53163_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53165_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53165_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53172_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53172_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53176_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53176_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53220_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53220_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53225_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53225_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 53228_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53236_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53236_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53240_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53240_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53243_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 53243_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53245_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 53245_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02163_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 02163_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24934_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
Preparing report for the candidate 24934_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21053_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221
The candidate 21053_fd_UMa-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_06-09-17_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0221 did not pass the final checks