Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J100127.57+663803.5,2461274.9460,11.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J100127.57+663803.5 20260822.4460 11.76CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
UMa-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 636392 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 636392 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 533.1221
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 561.4736
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1515.2278
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 369.0107
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1511.4710
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 370.9170
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.84218
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:41:38.4000034' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:41:38.4000034' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.4455833333 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:41:48.3034772' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.4456979516 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.998747005521 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0001378589734 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.5469444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 19.8333333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.49033608560507 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits :)
Spent 0.522870 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:42:38.3098465' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:42:38.3098465' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.4462767243 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:42:48.2148190' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.446391366 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 143.998746912733 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.0001379272708 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 23.6177777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 19.8869444444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.48338143154599 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.59 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 39.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 3.600288 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits :)
Spent 0.509370 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/d_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits

fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.94569907
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0920 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00899 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JVgmjcagEL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XaTOiQHdoz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qON1Ldi1i4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZaJhvHXa4r
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.870000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.870000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.34
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0324 to 171.9972 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5117 out of 5413 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5413 out of 8779 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec +62.9079 to +75.4793 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 117.0326 to 171.9963 deg, Dec 62.9079 to 75.4793 deg
Loaded 9306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5133 out of 5416 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5416 out of 8894 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
2.1 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
13.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
13.1 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 10.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.JVgmjcagEL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8779
Got 8779 stars (including 8092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8779 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.300 n_q1=1067 n_q2=1443 n_q3=1095 n_q4=1281 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.381
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XaTOiQHdoz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=664, bad_region=0, passed=8894
Got 8894 stars (including 8220 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8894 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4886 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.9 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5374)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1066 n_q2=1431 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.353
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qON1Ldi1i4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=120, bad_region=0, passed=2538
Got 2538 stars (including 2415 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2340 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2331 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2337 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2339 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2336 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2530 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2336 stars left (next iteration limit 2570)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2336 robust_rms=7.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=25.397 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2336 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2336 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.402 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2336 robust_rms_before=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.366 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.402
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.366 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=2336 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.355 n_q1=771 n_q2=341 n_q3=812 n_q4=412 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.177
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZaJhvHXa4r (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=119, bad_region=0, passed=2595
Got 2595 stars (including 2471 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2393 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2588 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 767 to 828 (Dec 63.5 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2393 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2391 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2587 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 2391 stars left (next iteration limit 2630)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=2391 robust_rms=7.301 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.551 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=2391 robust_rms=0.536 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.616 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=2391 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=2391 robust_rms_before=1.033 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.371 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.411
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.371 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=2391 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=795 n_q2=348 n_q3=832 n_q4=416 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits sigma_overall=0.367 worst_q_ratio=1.381
ref2=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits sigma_overall=0.368 worst_q_ratio=1.353
new1=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.177
new2=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.164
reference average sigma_overall=0.3675 worst_q_ratio=1.367
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293_astrometric_residuals.png (4886 matched stars from wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (2336 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (2391 matched stars from wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0920 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Image size: 942.2'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 09:36:20.346 +69:59:16.26
Second-epoch image center 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0917 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 09:35:15.818 +69:59:12.55
Second-epoch second image center 09:35:16.248 +69:59:44.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00899 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f6WychfWuA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9042kQ7Zo3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ioaBAK5k8O
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GHJWaoQrqs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.754400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.754400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.25
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51532 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec +62.8119 to +75.4848 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.7731 to 172.6868 deg, Dec 62.8119 to 75.4848 deg
Loaded 9545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4865 out of 5490 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5490 out of 51532 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 51887 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec +62.8124 to +75.4915 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 116.6991 to 172.5281 deg, Dec 62.8124 to 75.4915 deg
Loaded 9544 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4853 out of 5491 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5491 out of 51887 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
1.9 pix UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
13.4 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
13.5 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.4 (SNR ) 13.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.f6WychfWuA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2624, bad_region=3, passed=51519
Got 51519 stars (including 48797 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51519 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51519 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4894 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits N_match=4894 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1073 n_q2=1412 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1294 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.422
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9042kQ7Zo3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2687, bad_region=5, passed=51863
Got 51863 stars (including 49074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51863 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 764 to 829 (Dec 62.8 to 75.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.469 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.303 n_q1=1092 n_q2=1397 n_q3=1115 n_q4=1292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.361
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ioaBAK5k8O (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=316, bad_region=27, passed=15325
Got 15325 stars (including 14956 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15325 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4845 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4845 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4851 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15325 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5329)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=7.184 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.520 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.569 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4844 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4844 robust_rms_before=1.038 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.451 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.472
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.386 n_q1=1565 n_q2=665 n_q3=1764 n_q4=850 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.GHJWaoQrqs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=316, bad_region=30, passed=15756
Got 15756 stars (including 15385 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15756 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013086 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010469 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 766 to 828 (Dec 63.4 to 75.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15756 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=7.129 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.373 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.605 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.477 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4843 robust_rms_before=1.054 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.377 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.440 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.477
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1588 n_q2=686 n_q3=1738 n_q4=831 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.047
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 08:45:37.61 +69:58:28.7: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:35:00.64 +74:11:35.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0292.fits at 10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 08:45:37.61 +69:58:28.7: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:35:00.64 +74:11:35.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:45:37.61 +69:58:28.7: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1346 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 10:35:00.64 +74:11:35.0: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6194 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_01-08-51_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0293.fits at 10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7: 12.70 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7255 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out44479.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65333_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 65333_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 22.44570 | 2461274.94570 | 12.64 | 10:35:00.48 +74:11:35.6 | 7076 6167 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.60 | 10:35:00.79 +74:11:34.4 | 7076 6162 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65335_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 65335_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.91 | 08:31:20.60 +66:19:29.5 | 1037 1275 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:31:20.57 +66:19:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 65705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.25 | 08:32:42.01 +69:20:07.6 | 1495 3048 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:32:41.75 +69:20:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65818_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 65818_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.79 | 08:34:25.01 +66:54:28.3 | 1293 1586 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:34:24.96 +66:54:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65925_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 65925_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 13.04 | 08:12:29.82 +68:27:37.2 | 0284 2800 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:12:29.74 +68:27:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66076_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 66076_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 22.44570 | 2461274.94570 | 13.13 | 08:45:37.79 +69:58:29.7 | 2236 3314 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 13.14 | 08:45:37.43 +69:58:27.8 | 2235 3308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37620_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 37620_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.77 | 08:34:09.85 +66:03:42.6 | 1175 1084 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 37336_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 11.58 | 09:14:35.14 +65:59:15.9 | 3644 0767 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 08003_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 11.27 | 08:04:00.05 +73:24:30.7 | 0787 5799 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:04:00.13 +73:24:30.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 07628_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 10.77 | 10:55:39.87 +71:52:09.4 | 8411 5145 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:55:39.93 +71:52:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44479_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 44479_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29568_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 29568_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.34 | 08:17:56.84 +69:24:14.2 | 0732 3271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49734_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 49734_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 11.17 | 10:07:00.70 +67:32:47.3 | 6677 1935 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:07:00.73 +67:32:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 36340_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 36340_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.60 | 09:17:56.10 +69:05:36.7 | 3887 2637 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25922_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 25922_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.83 | 08:52:15.11 +70:26:23.4 | 2610 3540 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:52:15.02 +70:26:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 23914_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 7.46 | 10:44:38.04 +68:46:32.5 | 8539 3191 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:44:38.03 +68:46:32.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08871_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 08871_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.66 | 08:29:07.19 +73:36:28.7 | 1871 5615 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27201_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 27201_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.92 | 09:34:28.49 +69:49:48.9 | 4753 3094 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 09:34:28.49 +69:49:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14707_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 14707_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.94 | 09:42:56.89 +72:15:05.4 | 5070 4575 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 09:42:56.89 +72:15:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27957_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 27957_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.77 | 10:21:02.63 +68:44:51.0 | 7298 2808 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:21:02.66 +68:44:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 45499_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.87 | 09:02:33.07 +67:37:48.2 | 2988 1798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 09:02:33.05 +67:37:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 44723_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 12.52 | 08:50:31.92 +67:26:23.7 | 2285 1755 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 08:50:31.76 +67:26:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46718_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 46718_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.57 | 10:41:55.72 +65:42:57.7 | 8995 1380 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:41:55.74 +65:42:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195
The candidate 22705_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.44639 | 2461274.94639 | 6.48 | 10:43:03.84 +69:04:33.9 | 8398 3335 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits |
**** FOUND 10:43:03.78 +69:04:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7
Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-22_CI_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_054315_TTUQ1b1x1_1985811_ztYDtEJr/monitoring_positions.txt
Read 15328 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.9107 to 171.9369 deg, Dec +63.3842 to +75.2841 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.9107 to 171.9369 deg, Dec 63.3842 to 75.2841 deg
Loaded 8946 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5188 out of 5312 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5312 out of 15328 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461274.94570 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 143.81336 deg Dec= +69.98603 deg
Frame center: alt= +23.809 deg az= 23.516 deg airmass= 2.4602
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 23.547 deg (difference +0.262 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.4903 (we compute 2.4602)
Airmass zero-point fit: REJECT_K_RANGE k= +1.1169 +/- 0.0115 mag/airmass N= 3932 airmass span 1.8229-3.8631 scatter 0.2812 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-41-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0194.fits: REJECT_K_RANGE +2.663249 -1.116866 2.4602 +1.1169 3932 2.0402 0.2812 1.8229 3.8631
Read 15760 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 115.9116 to 171.9376 deg, Dec +63.3843 to +75.3069 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 115.9116 to 171.9376 deg, Dec 63.3843 to 75.3069 deg
Loaded 8962 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5190 out of 5308 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5308 out of 15760 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461274.94639 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 143.81515 deg Dec= +69.99500 deg
Frame center: alt= +23.885 deg az= 23.566 deg airmass= 2.4530
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 23.618 deg (difference +0.267 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.4834 (we compute 2.4530)
Airmass zero-point fit: REJECT_K_RANGE k= +1.1109 +/- 0.0121 mag/airmass N= 4004 airmass span 1.8195-3.8845 scatter 0.2982 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-42-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0195.fits: REJECT_K_RANGE +2.644303 -1.110882 2.4530 +1.1109 4004 2.0649 0.2982 1.8195 3.8845
########### Completed UMa-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7
###################################################################################
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7 -- a known variable star
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
10:01:27.66 +66:38:03.7
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.94569907 -observatory V36
09:45:55.79 +15:15:33.8 Mercury (-1.7mag)
12:50:29.96 -07:49:04.6 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:30:07.36 +23:38:54.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:55:34.72 +17:52:45.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:48.38 +03:01:25.8 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:02.62 +21:00:20.3 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:07.58 +00:06:13.6 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:50.14 -23:35:13.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:32:24.54 -28:19:59.9 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 05:45 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.94569907:
08:55:36.47 +17:52:37.5 Io (6.1mag)
08:55:43.25 +17:52:06.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:55:51.21 +17:51:30.2 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:55:15.95 +17:54:13.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:53:02.97 +18:00:49.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:55:32.71 +17:52:55.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:52:42.23 +17:56:40.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:59:42.28 +17:25:58.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:57:47.46 +18:06:22.0 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:44.33 +03:01:51.2 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:52.87 +03:01:18.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:23.86 +03:03:07.6 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:55.86 +03:01:43.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:53.04 +02:52:50.6 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 05:45 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.94569907:
20:12:14.31 -13:57:56.1 JWST
17:44:03.59 +32:45:02.9 Chandra
12:11:48.80 -61:50:19.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 05:45 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.94569907 -observatory V36
03:28:20.11 +18:26:50.2 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:54.75 -34:28:29.8 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:06:34.94 -69:29:40.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:09.69 +33:18:34.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:21:18.82 +42:25:53.9 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:26:39.29 +30:22:10.7 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:56:59.51 +26:16:54.8 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:47.47 +27:50:54.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:38:21.75 +05:17:58.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:15:41.46 -12:52:55.9 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:53:20.10 +64:03:22.7 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:36:25.69 -14:14:27.7 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:23:21.04 +32:01:01.7 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:42.17 +15:30:12.9 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:46:45.97 +43:29:22.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:49:16.48 +49:41:20.1 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:25:49.40 -12:53:58.3 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:04:39.48 +21:35:27.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:53:24.12 +19:57:05.9 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:07:27.54 +01:20:51.7 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:36.46 +76:16:42.6 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:55.32 +46:21:00.2 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:58:55.97 +09:56:09.3 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:12:28.58 -32:19:33.6 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:37:46.71 -04:19:36.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:36:35.50 -00:00:16.6 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:35.80 -06:06:27.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:06:58.18 +20:14:20.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:25:45.74 -25:00:25.8 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:12:02.74 +14:32:28.5 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:30:42.69 +25:34:21.8 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:47:50.07 +22:26:52.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:42:50.68 +28:16:56.2 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:51:51.30 +24:04:38.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:12:42.25 -15:38:16.0 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:56:52.34 +21:01:40.3 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:52:05.44 +18:05:43.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:59:35.50 +03:05:51.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:09:30.54 -18:37:23.4 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:03:53.93 +38:07:17.5 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:03:15.88 +29:48:37.1 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:06:18.08 +09:23:30.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:19.70 -51:47:52.9 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:03:31.18 +30:51:44.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:47:33.50 +37:04:57.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:16:13.82 +01:32:41.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:13:47.66 +17:39:48.2 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 05:45 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 05:45 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 05:45 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:27:30.457 +02:47:32.36 AT 2026xfu 2026-01-14.53 21.69
17:59:19.284 +29:24:54.02 AT 2026xft 2026-07-18.43 20.84
19:54:12.936 -24:01:35.76 AT 2026xfs 2026-05-17.56 19.77
08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4
23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15
20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20
13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85
23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28
10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21
21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68
14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9
02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98
20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93
21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9
20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74
14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62
22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23
13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92
13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07
13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 05:45 tns_transients_list.txt