NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cam-01-Q1b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits
Field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.nao.ac.jp
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.nao.ac.jp)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 648280 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 648280 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits

renamed 'Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits_preview.png'
Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 661.6740 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 620.8029 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1334.1561 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 394.5557 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1335.2331 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 390.6440 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.01633 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.010 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:15:49.9245992' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:15:49.9245992' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.4276611572 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:15:59.8284819' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.4277757872 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.8558858657027 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0670625790093 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.3833333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 5.65833333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.72371738922671 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 64.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits :) Spent 0.474032 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:16:42.8374714' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:16:42.8374714' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.4282735763 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:16:52.7404139' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.4283881946 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 89.8558850618868 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 85.0670626042447 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.4016666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 5.65111111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.72294562843096 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '06 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+85 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29507 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 24.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.3 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.79 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 22.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 64.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 3.600288 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits :) Spent 0.483767 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/d_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits


fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.92777690 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0234 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00954 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uQySG1x9ba Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HhgQDSmYsP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QkceZGKkrG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9dQiN8K9rD Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.843350 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.843350 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.21
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec +75.8491 to +89.8984 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 181.3580 to 179.5073 deg, Dec 75.8491 to 89.8984 deg Loaded 33013 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7262 out of 7632 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7632 out of 12096 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=6.0) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec +75.8292 to +89.9114 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0696 to 179.5067 deg, Dec 75.8292 to 89.9114 deg Loaded 33178 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7284 out of 7665 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7665 out of 12185 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=6.0) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.1 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 2.1 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.2 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 13.6 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.uQySG1x9ba (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=848, bad_region=0, passed=12096 Got 12096 stars (including 11236 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12096 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3580 through 0 to 179.5073, gap 179.5073 to 181.3580 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 181.3577 through 0 to 179.5070, gap 179.5070 to 181.3577 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4923 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12096 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.230 n_q1=1173 n_q2=1016 n_q3=1274 n_q4=1455 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.278 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.HhgQDSmYsP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=862, bad_region=0, passed=12185 Got 12185 stars (including 11310 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12185 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0696 through 0 to 179.5067, gap 179.5067 to 180.0696 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0710 through 0 to 179.5079, gap 179.5079 to 180.0710 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 829 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4927 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 12185 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5413) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.244 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.225 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1019 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1464 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.306 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.QkceZGKkrG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=212, bad_region=0, passed=4300 Got 4300 stars (including 4081 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4300 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0335 through 0 to 179.9688, gap 179.9688 to 180.0335 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4003 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3994 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3994 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3994 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0281 through 0 to 179.9661, gap 179.9661 to 180.0281 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4003 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3994 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3994 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4300 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 3994 stars left (next iteration limit 4393) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3994 robust_rms=9.212 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=22.743 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3994 robust_rms=0.432 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.456 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3994 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.340 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3994 robust_rms_before=0.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.358 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.340 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.358 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=3994 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.309 n_q1=1361 n_q2=806 n_q3=1087 n_q4=740 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.051 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.9dQiN8K9rD (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=193, bad_region=0, passed=4211 Got 4211 stars (including 4012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4211 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0340 through 0 to 179.9697, gap 179.9697 to 180.0340 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3930 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0284 through 0 to 179.9667, gap 179.9667 to 180.0284 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.8) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3939 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3930 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4211 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 3930 stars left (next iteration limit 4323) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=8.996 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=23.269 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=0.429 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3930 robust_rms=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.343 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3930 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.321 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.364 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.343 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=3930 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1302 n_q2=810 n_q3=1085 n_q4=733 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits sigma_overall=0.272 worst_q_ratio=1.278 ref2=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits sigma_overall=0.255 worst_q_ratio=1.306 new1=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.051 new2=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits sigma_overall=0.358 worst_q_ratio=1.043 reference average sigma_overall=0.2635 worst_q_ratio=1.292 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250_astrometric_residuals.png (4918 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251_astrometric_residuals.png (4922 matched stars from wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168_astrometric_residuals.png (3994 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169_astrometric_residuals.png (3930 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 21653_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    11.21    06:23:25.75 +80:04:16.7   5525 0266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.71 +80:04:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01819_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 01819_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.17    02:32:18.79 +89:15:46.6   4383 5921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:32:19.14 +89:15:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 11786_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    9.52    02:43:15.89 +81:08:12.8   0785 2567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:43:15.83 +81:08:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 02438_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 02438_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.46    07:40:26.42 +87:01:09.7   5538 4600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 07:40:26.44 +87:01:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 04594_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 04594_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.41    07:31:03.58 +82:24:42.5   6624 2041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 07:31:03.54 +82:24:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 00627_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    5.94    09:37:04.22 +81:19:37.0   9081 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 09:37:04.24 +81:19:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Image size: 942.0'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Image size: 941.5'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0314 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Image size: 941.6'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 05:58:09.354 +85:01:41.35 Second-epoch image center 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0234 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 05:57:35.684 +84:59:57.37 Second-epoch second image center 05:57:33.086 +85:00:31.53 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00954 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits &> /tmp/tmp.I2zq8dAqXd Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits &> /tmp/tmp.immM6YPWnA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.A4pL81opQk Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6TypESejeu Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits and wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.714550 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.714550 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.34 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.37
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75571 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec +75.7296 to +89.9628 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0704 to 179.9879 deg, Dec 75.7296 to 89.9628 deg Loaded 33692 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6762 out of 7807 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7807 out of 75571 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (aperture=4.6) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 75116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec +75.7501 to +89.9630 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 180.0694 to 179.9961 deg, Dec 75.7501 to 89.9630 deg Loaded 33600 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6759 out of 7815 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 7815 out of 75116 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 53 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 2.0 pix Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 2.0 pix fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 15.4 mag. Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 13.9 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 13.8 mag. fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 13.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.I2zq8dAqXd (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=4540, bad_region=2, passed=75560 Got 75560 stars (including 70879 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75560 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0704 through 0 to 179.9879, gap 179.9879 to 180.0704 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0705 through 0 to 179.9881, gap 179.9881 to 180.0705 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.7 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75560 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.227 n_q1=1150 n_q2=1043 n_q3=1285 n_q4=1444 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.immM6YPWnA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4531, bad_region=0, passed=75103 Got 75103 stars (including 70436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75103 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0694 through 0 to 179.9961, gap 179.9961 to 180.0694 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0711 through 0 to 179.9966, gap 179.9966 to 180.0711 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 828 to 900 (Dec 75.8 to 90.0) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 75103 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" Excluding outliers - 4922 stars left (next iteration limit 5414) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits N_match=4922 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.249 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.218 n_q1=1153 n_q2=1048 n_q3=1273 n_q4=1448 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.270 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits -region wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.A4pL81opQk (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1287, bad_region=34, passed=33326 Got 33326 stars (including 31930 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33326 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0043 through 0 to 179.9901, gap 179.9901 to 180.0043 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4902 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33326 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0258 through 0 to 179.9916, gap 179.9916 to 180.0258 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4909 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33326 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4902 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 33326 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4902 stars left (next iteration limit 5392) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=7.846 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=34.788 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.428 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4902 robust_rms=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.338 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4902 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.341 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.322 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.357 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.338 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.357 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits N_match=4902 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.308 n_q1=1748 n_q2=995 n_q3=1336 n_q4=823 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.058 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.6TypESejeu (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=911, bad_region=31, passed=32487 Got 32487 stars (including 31488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32487 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0303 through 0 to 179.9897, gap 179.9897 to 180.0303 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4911 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 180.0269 through 0 to 179.9807, gap 179.9807 to 180.0269 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 835 to 900 (Dec 77.2 to 89.9) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4910 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 32487 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 4905 stars left (next iteration limit 5396) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=7.955 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=32.465 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.453 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4905 robust_rms=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.345 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5 SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4905 robust_rms_before=0.859 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.343 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.324 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.353 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.345 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.353 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits N_match=4905 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.307 n_q1=1727 n_q2=1000 n_q3=1326 n_q4=852 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.049 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/wcs_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:29:03.50 +84:16:45.4: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:33:27.62 +82:13:43.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:50:33.38 +81:43:20.6: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:54:46.03 +81:38:29.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:13:04.01 +83:59:02.8: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:29:27.88 +81:41:10.6: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:09:38.65 +83:34:31.1: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:30.2: 12.19 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 01:08:33.68 +83:24:16.2: 12.39 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:13:04.01 +83:59:02.8: 12.94 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:09:38.65 +83:34:31.1: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:29:03.50 +84:16:45.4: 12.43 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:33:27.62 +82:13:43.3: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:50:33.38 +81:43:20.6: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:54:46.03 +81:38:29.7: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:29:27.88 +81:41:10.6: 13.53 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:13:04.01 +83:59:02.8: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1840 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:09:38.65 +83:34:31.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6853 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:03.50 +84:16:45.4: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6692 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:54:46.03 +81:38:29.7: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1086 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:50:33.38 +81:43:20.6: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3080 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:29:27.88 +81:41:10.6: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5818 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:33:27.62 +82:13:43.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9532 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:30.2: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 01:08:33.68 +83:24:16.2: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.18 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:56:31.60 +80:59:30.2: ref_mag=12.18 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3893 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.39 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:08:33.68 +83:24:16.2: ref_mag=12.39 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4031 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 09:37:05.38 +82:56:29.1: 12.30 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 00:16:01.59 +86:41:21.1: 12.76 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:11:10.69 +83:35:20.6: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:49:36.44 +83:21:43.2: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:01:29.53 +84:21:55.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:13:28.05 +84:02:25.3: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 07:09:20.32 +85:35:58.3: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:48:15.90 +81:52:40.9: 13.46 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:05:17.68 +83:28:01.3: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 00:16:01.59 +86:41:21.1: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 09:37:05.38 +82:56:29.1: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:01:29.53 +84:21:55.6: 12.71 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:11:10.69 +83:35:20.6: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:49:36.44 +83:21:43.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:13:28.05 +84:02:25.3: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.28 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.71 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:16:01.59 +86:41:21.1: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7378 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:01:29.53 +84:21:55.6: ref_mag=12.71 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8910 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:37:05.38 +82:56:29.1: ref_mag=12.28 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3063 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:49:36.44 +83:21:43.2: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8425 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:11:10.69 +83:35:20.6: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9085 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:13:28.05 +84:02:25.3: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5033 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 07:09:20.32 +85:35:58.3: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:09:20.32 +85:35:58.3: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7062 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:05:17.68 +83:28:01.3: 13.13 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:48:15.90 +81:52:40.9: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:17.68 +83:28:01.3: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0489 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:48:15.90 +81:52:40.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3180 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:58:12.54 +84:50:40.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:05:23.58 +81:29:34.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 03:48:00.47 +80:54:23.6: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 05:17:37.32 +84:13:32.4: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 04:39:25.71 +82:29:55.3: 13.16 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:58:12.54 +84:50:40.1: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:58:12.54 +84:50:40.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0248 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 02:45:37.08 +83:37:54.3: 13.80 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-02-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0250.fits at 06:10:55.58 +81:06:47.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 03:48:00.47 +80:54:23.6: 13.70 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 05:17:37.32 +84:13:32.4: 13.14 +/- 0.03 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 04:39:25.71 +82:29:55.3: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 03:48:00.47 +80:54:23.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5583 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:37.32 +84:13:32.4: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1317 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:39:25.71 +82:29:55.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0396 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:05:23.58 +81:29:34.3: 13.19 +/- 0.04 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.02 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:23.58 +81:29:34.3: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0454 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 02:45:37.08 +83:37:54.3: 13.84 +/- 0.06 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 02:45:37.08 +83:37:54.3: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5966 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_00-03-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0251.fits at 06:10:55.58 +81:06:47.7: 13.77 +/- 0.05 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.04 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:55.58 +81:06:47.7: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8122 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91173_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.54    04:29:27.90 +81:41:09.8   2950 1520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.67    04:29:27.85 +81:41:11.5   2950 1515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91175_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.45    03:09:48.42 +83:29:02.8   2165 3221   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 03:09:48.15 +83:29:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91176_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91176_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.42    01:13:03.73 +83:59:01.4   1304 4960   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.07    01:13:04.30 +83:59:04.2   1305 4955   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91181_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.33    01:50:33.43 +81:43:21.2   0358 3741   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.29    01:50:33.33 +81:43:19.9   0359 3735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91186_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.04    03:54:45.94 +81:38:30.6   2249 1815   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.24    03:54:46.13 +81:38:28.8   2250 1809   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91188_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.92    02:09:37.65 +83:34:31.7   1517 4023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.57    02:09:39.64 +83:34:30.5   1518 4017   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91189_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91189_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.84    04:57:00.58 +81:33:36.0   3506 1263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 04:57:00.58 +81:33:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91190_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.78    04:33:14.46 +85:56:18.8   3895 3899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 04:33:14.47 +85:56:18.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91191_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91191_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.94    01:33:27.67 +82:13:42.6   0462 4205   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.97    01:33:27.58 +82:13:44.1   0463 4200   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91192_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.65    04:29:03.65 +84:16:45.6   3498 2986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.69    04:29:03.36 +84:16:45.1   3499 2981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 91193_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 91193_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.39    01:08:33.34 +83:24:16.3   0945 4913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.41    01:08:34.03 +83:24:16.0   0945 4907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 93607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.42    04:56:31.51 +80:59:30.3   3412 0937   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.36    04:56:31.68 +80:59:30.1   3412 0932   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93859_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 93859_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.18    00:27:19.51 +86:54:59.4   2881 5928   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 00:27:19.80 +86:54:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 93909_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 93909_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.88    04:10:45.78 +80:41:31.9   2315 1128   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 04:10:45.78 +80:41:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94052_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.71    02:46:17.03 +82:48:51.3   1576 3218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:46:17.04 +82:48:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94069_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94069_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.60    03:13:28.27 +84:02:25.3   2427 3444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.43    03:13:27.84 +84:02:25.2   2428 3439   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94714_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.88    02:01:29.59 +84:21:56.5   1846 4394   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.90    02:01:29.46 +84:21:54.8   1846 4389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94849_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94849_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.73    00:16:00.95 +86:41:20.3   2730 6011   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.74    00:16:02.23 +86:41:21.8   2731 6006   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94885_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94885_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.94    03:49:36.25 +83:21:43.1   2682 2767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.77    03:49:36.63 +83:21:43.4   2683 2761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94905_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94905_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.97    03:11:10.92 +83:35:21.1   2223 3259   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.85    03:11:10.46 +83:35:20.0   2224 3254   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 94988_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 94988_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.31    09:37:05.31 +82:56:30.2   8263 3827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.31    09:37:05.46 +82:56:28.1   8264 3821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95032_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95032_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.24    04:27:23.73 +80:51:10.8   2725 1060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 04:27:23.54 +80:51:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95137_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95137_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.15    04:03:04.69 +81:13:03.8   2293 1495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 04:03:04.82 +81:13:03.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95149_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95149_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    12.68    07:09:20.42 +85:35:58.1   5593 3702   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.74    07:09:20.23 +85:35:58.5   5593 3696   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95200_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95200_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.95    05:19:00.59 +81:13:19.4   3954 0968   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 05:19:00.62 +81:13:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95276_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95276_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.23    02:48:15.33 +81:52:40.6   1191 2802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.48    02:48:16.48 +81:52:41.2   1192 2796   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95338_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95338_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.02    05:05:17.81 +83:28:01.0   3919 2355   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.10    05:05:17.55 +83:28:01.7   3920 2350   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95388_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95388_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.12    02:36:38.10 +81:39:19.3   0919 2890   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:36:37.76 +81:39:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95494_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95494_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.03    03:58:12.89 +84:50:39.9   3239 3478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.02    03:58:12.19 +84:50:40.3   3240 3473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95582_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95582_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.02    06:05:23.53 +81:29:34.5   5009 1089   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.08    06:05:23.62 +81:29:34.1   5009 1083   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95602_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.54    08:56:11.77 +86:42:42.8   6147 4821   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 08:56:11.24 +86:42:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95607_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.12    04:39:25.35 +82:29:55.3   3309 1915   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.99    04:39:26.07 +82:29:55.4   3310 1909   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 95922_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 95922_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.10    05:17:37.11 +84:13:31.9   4196 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.17    05:17:37.52 +84:13:32.9   4197 2764   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96415_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 96415_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.51    02:55:08.64 +82:23:40.4   1517 2917   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:55:07.89 +82:23:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 96488_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.56    03:48:00.54 +80:54:24.0   1889 1507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.56    03:48:00.41 +80:54:23.2   1890 1501   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 96649_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 96649_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.81    07:29:48.41 +82:24:04.4   6604 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 07:29:48.54 +82:24:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97270_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 97270_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.63    02:59:24.76 +85:11:50.1   2740 4093   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:59:24.82 +85:11:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 97574_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 97574_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.72    02:45:37.72 +83:37:55.9   1927 3573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.51    02:45:36.45 +83:37:52.8   1928 3567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 98218_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 98218_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 22.42778    2461274.92778    13.84    06:10:54.69 +81:06:47.6   5150 0868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-15-49_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0168.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    13.79    06:10:56.46 +81:06:47.7   5151 0862   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 03297_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.15    09:37:04.21 +81:19:37.1   9081 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 09:37:04.23 +81:19:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 27033_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 27033_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.67    01:08:51.40 +86:15:26.5   2586 5468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 01:08:51.40 +86:15:26.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 10656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 10656_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.52    02:32:19.49 +89:15:46.5   4383 5921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:32:19.69 +89:15:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 28902_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.65    07:31:03.54 +82:24:42.6   6624 2041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 07:31:03.49 +82:24:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22998_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 22998_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.48    07:55:15.38 +83:13:09.0   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22331_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 22331_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    12.36    01:13:01.57 +87:14:26.5   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 66646_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    11.38    06:23:25.71 +80:04:17.1   5525 0266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 06:23:25.66 +80:04:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 44223_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    9.79    02:43:15.87 +81:08:12.9   0785 2567   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 02:43:15.83 +81:08:12.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 70945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 70945_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    10.46    05:28:19.97 +82:43:01.1   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (34.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 14479_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 14479_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.70    07:40:26.47 +87:01:09.8   5538 4600   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 07:40:26.51 +87:01:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07911_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 07911_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.84    09:15:21.37 +84:10:52.2   7438 3975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 09:15:21.50 +84:10:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09211_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 09211_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.74    09:11:12.60 +80:49:43.7   8950 2604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 09:11:12.51 +80:49:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 00001_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 00001_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.64    10:08:33.85 +83:55:06.7   8027 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 10:08:33.99 +83:55:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 The candidate 29091_fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 22.42839    2461274.92839    6.64    08:04:46.88 +79:28:45.5   8187 0865   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_051730_TTUQ1b1x1_1034989_lxKvA25C/fd_Cam-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_05-16-42_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0169.fits **** FOUND 08:04:46.77 +79:28:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed Cam-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.92777690 -observatory V36 09:45:47.24 +15:16:14.2 Mercury (-1.7mag) 12:50:26.47 -07:48:35.1 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:30:04.32 +23:38:55.1 Mars (1.3mag) 08:55:33.78 +17:52:49.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:54:48.55 +03:01:27.2 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:13:02.55 +21:00:20.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:07.66 +00:06:14.1 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:26:50.24 -23:35:13.4 Pluto (14.5mag) 17:31:15.57 -28:21:56.9 Moon (-11.0mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 05:21 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.92777690: 08:55:35.92 +17:52:39.3 Io (6.1mag) 08:55:42.09 +17:52:11.5 Europa (6.3mag) 08:55:50.20 +17:51:34.3 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:55:14.88 +17:54:18.1 Callisto (6.9mag) 08:53:02.02 +18:00:52.2 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:55:31.81 +17:52:58.8 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:52:41.28 +17:56:43.7 Elara (17.7mag) 08:59:41.34 +17:26:02.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:57:46.59 +18:06:25.4 Carme (19.0mag) 00:54:44.59 +03:01:52.5 Titan (8.4mag) 00:54:53.07 +03:01:19.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:24.03 +03:03:08.8 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:54:56.10 +03:01:44.4 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:53:53.24 +02:52:52.0 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 05:21 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.92777690: 20:12:08.93 -13:59:08.2 JWST 17:41:51.13 +33:15:59.2 Chandra 11:57:19.87 -61:29:50.5 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 05:21 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.92777690 -observatory V36 03:28:19.15 +18:26:45.9 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:54.71 -34:28:30.9 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:06:34.01 -69:29:37.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:13:09.48 +33:18:33.2 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:21:16.45 +42:25:37.0 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:26:40.21 +30:22:16.6 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:56:58.55 +26:16:55.9 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:34:46.46 +27:50:56.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:38:21.03 +05:17:58.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:15:41.15 -12:52:53.0 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:53:21.28 +64:03:33.4 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:36:26.33 -14:14:21.9 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:23:19.94 +32:00:58.4 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:42.18 +15:30:13.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:46:47.06 +43:29:22.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:49:18.12 +49:41:19.9 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:25:48.66 -12:53:58.1 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:04:38.92 +21:35:39.7 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:53:22.50 +19:57:10.4 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:07:26.77 +01:20:56.5 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:10:35.05 +76:16:50.8 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:55.38 +46:21:00.0 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:58:55.01 +09:56:03.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:12:27.71 -32:19:16.7 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:37:46.02 -04:19:31.6 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:36:33.31 +00:00:04.4 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:51:36.15 -06:06:23.5 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:06:55.90 +20:14:23.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:25:46.57 -25:00:20.3 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:12:02.14 +14:32:25.6 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:30:40.18 +25:34:31.8 16.4mag 93P/Lovas 04:47:46.83 +22:26:26.9 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:42:47.26 +28:17:07.6 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:51:48.80 +24:04:51.1 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:12:39.98 -15:37:52.1 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos 05:56:50.87 +21:01:41.4 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:52:03.72 +18:05:47.3 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 23:59:35.92 +03:05:53.3 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:09:31.97 -18:37:25.9 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 08:03:50.45 +38:07:17.7 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:03:27.26 +29:50:06.5 12.2mag 169P/NEAT 03:06:16.59 +09:23:32.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 20:16:19.87 -51:48:01.8 18.0mag 259P/Garradd 04:03:28.12 +30:51:20.3 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:47:30.39 +37:05:01.7 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:16:13.28 +01:32:48.9 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:13:46.69 +17:39:51.5 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 05:21 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 05:21 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag 18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 05:21 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 11:27:30.457 +02:47:32.36 AT 2026xfu 2026-01-14.53 21.69 17:59:19.284 +29:24:54.02 AT 2026xft 2026-07-18.43 20.84 19:54:12.936 -24:01:35.76 AT 2026xfs 2026-05-17.56 19.77 08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4 23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15 20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20 13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85 23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28 10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21 21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68 14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9 02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98 20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93 21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9 20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74 14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62 22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23 13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92 13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07 13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 05:21 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 72 C