Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 22.4217  2461274.9217  11.49  23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3
 66.63687 -72.72487 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 4.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  11.7     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3:  14.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3:  14.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -crosshair 5999.78271 2452.25220 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -crosshair 6004.38721 2451.19727 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42171 23 51 37.44 -16 47 00.3          11.5 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42147 23 51 37.45 -16 47 00.2          11.5 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42194 23 51 37.43 -16 47 00.4          11.5 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 22.4217*  23 51 37.44 -16 47 00.3  11.5 U             Aqr       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.9217,11.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.4217 11.49CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 22.4217  2461274.9217  12.36  23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1
 69.85717 -73.91751 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 4.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -0      0       0  12.5     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1:  14.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -crosshair 5088.33203 2493.22705 image    wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -crosshair 5092.86719 2492.18286 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42171 23 57 55.17 -16 51 33.1          12.4 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42147 23 57 55.16 -16 51 33.0          12.4 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 22.42194 23 57 55.17 -16 51 33.2          12.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 22.4217*  23 57 55.17 -16 51 33.1  12.4 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.9217,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.4217 12.36CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461274.92194154 22.08.2026 10:07:25.749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.29
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  2546
Objects passed selection criteria:  2537
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.0    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 2003.25
Average stars matched: 1786.5 (89.1801 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   229352 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Aug 22 05:13:54 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
First image: 2461233.94143410 12.07.2026 10:35:29.906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Last  image: 2461274.92194154 22.08.2026 10:07:25.749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 74
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.02
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  15894
Objects passed selection criteria:  15855
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.1    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 12817
Average stars matched: 11439.2 (89.2506 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   239640 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Sat Aug 22 05:14:31 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.nao.ac.jp
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.nao.ac.jp)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 651270 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 651270 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits


renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits_preview.png'

Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1853.4757
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 491.5044
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1839.2230
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 488.9982
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.80567
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.005
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     21.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:06:45.4255997' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:06:45.4255997' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61274.4213590855 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:06:55.3264272' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61274.4214736805 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.996836215913 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998453387582 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     34.9255555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     203.636111111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.74327189079541 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     21.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     21.9200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 72.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits :)

Spent 0.491275 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     22.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T05:07:25.7491422' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T10:07:25.7491422' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61274.4218257987 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T10:07:35.6508987' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61274.4219403937 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     359.996836168428 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9998453465419 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     34.8697222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =             203.8175 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.74569478038937 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20465 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     22.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     22.1000003814697 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.5 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 45.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               903.69 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 23.1 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 72.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =              4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits :)

Spent 0.528914 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits



fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.92147483
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00766 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UtBTIqZwCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FjaG7wDmbW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.q2RbQGl0l7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HaUHIcvngR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.09

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.2 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.1 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.1 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
 14.2 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.1 (SNR )  11.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.UtBTIqZwCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FjaG7wDmbW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.q2RbQGl0l7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=168, bad_region=593, passed=2677
Got 2677 stars (including 1932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2677 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5955 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5955
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5958 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5958
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1859 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2190 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 1859 stars left (next iteration limit 2046)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1859 robust_rms=7.111 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.514 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1859 robust_rms=0.333 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.365 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1859 robust_rms=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.302 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1859 robust_rms_before=0.998 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.290 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.304 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.302
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.304 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=1859 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=604 n_q2=370 n_q3=545 n_q4=340 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.028
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.HaUHIcvngR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=180, bad_region=608, passed=2686
Got 2686 stars (including 1925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5935 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5935
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5938 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5938
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2191 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 1855 stars left (next iteration limit 2040)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1855 robust_rms=7.178 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.034 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1855 robust_rms=0.361 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.387 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1855 robust_rms=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1855 robust_rms_before=1.019 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.329 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.307 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.331 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=1855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=589 n_q2=374 n_q3=549 n_q4=343 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.019
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits sigma_overall=0.308 worst_q_ratio=1.028
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits sigma_overall=0.339 worst_q_ratio=1.019
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194_astrometric_residuals.png (1859 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195_astrometric_residuals.png (1855 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.2:  10.81 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.2:  10.85 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.83 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.2: ref_mag=10.83 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9339 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    10.94    23:55:48.60 -17:47:26.2   5391 3057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    10.93    23:55:48.61 -17:47:26.2   5395 3056   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20438_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 20438_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    11.06    00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.4   4480 1171   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    8.06    23:43:49.87 -15:17:08.2   7156 1558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.88 -15:17:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0189 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Image size: 937.0'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0215 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  23:59:59.539 -18:01:14.34
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:01.418 -18:01:20.86
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00766 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.deat6FmgLc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SQKo0WuctO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8FrDLAe4yA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l3DKZULQKz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.22

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.22

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 32 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
 14.2 mag.  Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
 14.3 mag.  fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.3 (SNR )  13.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.deat6FmgLc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965
Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SQKo0WuctO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162
Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8FrDLAe4yA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=503, bad_region=2629, passed=15617
Got 15617 stars (including 12619 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15617 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5178 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5178
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4822 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4813 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5181 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5181
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13667 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 4810 stars left (next iteration limit 5294)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=6.719 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.626 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.410 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.392 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4810 robust_rms_before=1.014 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.369 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.373 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.392
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits N_match=4810 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1616 n_q2=908 n_q3=1456 n_q4=830 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.023
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l3DKZULQKz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=2, blended=510, bad_region=2654, passed=15996
Got 15996 stars (including 12984 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15996 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013014 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010411 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5836 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5836
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5839 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5839
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4817 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 14019 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5287)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=6.684 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.644 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.427 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.443 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4804 robust_rms=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4804 robust_rms_before=1.029 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.385 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.396
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.390 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.406 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.394 n_q1=1616 n_q2=905 n_q3=1462 n_q4=821 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.060
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:47.17 -19:25:07.1:  12.89 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3:  14.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:25.90 -22:13:33.0:  13.88 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3:  13.77 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:55.32 -21:10:29.6:  14.13 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:58.29 -20:05:37.7:  13.89 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:47.5:  14.00 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:19:07.40 -21:07:53.6:  13.89 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:41.13 -18:24:02.9:  13.77 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1:  14.94 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3:  14.87 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:47.17 -19:25:07.1:  12.95 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.92 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:47.17 -19:25:07.1: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.0372 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:25.90 -22:13:33.0:  13.70 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3:  13.72 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.77 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:25.90 -22:13:33.0: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4880 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.74 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.3: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4006 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:19:07.40 -21:07:53.6:  13.86 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:41.13 -18:24:02.9:  13.92 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.87 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:07.40 -21:07:53.6: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7198 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:58.29 -20:05:37.7:  14.07 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.83 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:41.13 -18:24:02.9: ref_mag=13.83 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6880 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:47.5:  13.84 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:55.32 -21:10:29.6:  14.15 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.96 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:58.29 -20:05:37.7: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7687 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.91 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.14 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:47.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6131 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:55.32 -21:10:29.6: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7835 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:54.37 -22:05:47.1:  14.20 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:52:41.75 -22:07:16.6:  14.07 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.6:  13.91 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:02.52 -18:35:52.9:  14.52 +/- 0.29  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.47 -22:09:34.1:  13.69 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:51:42.93 -21:59:25.7:  13.75 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:03.31 -22:13:14.9:  13.95 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:54.37 -22:05:47.1:  14.01 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.09 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:54.37 -22:05:47.1: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.5729 delta=0.52 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:52:41.75 -22:07:16.6:  14.22 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.6:  13.89 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.13 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:41.75 -22:07:16.6: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7147 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:19.00 -21:29:12.6: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7160 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:02.52 -18:35:52.9:  14.09 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:51:42.93 -21:59:25.7:  13.74 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.20 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:02.52 -18:35:52.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7241 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.75 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.47 -22:09:34.1:  13.69 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:42.93 -21:59:25.7: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7644 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:03.31 -22:13:14.9:  14.10 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.02 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.47 -22:09:34.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.8417 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:03.31 -22:13:14.9: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7706 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21472.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20934_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 20934_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.01    00:05:47.15 -19:25:07.2   3964 4044   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.07    00:05:47.19 -19:25:07.0   3968 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21308_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 21308_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    11.16    00:10:08.74 -17:33:12.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21472_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 21472_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21966_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
Preparing report for the candidate 21966_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22016_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    12.38    23:44:54.03 -14:38:52.7   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22412_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22412_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    12.89    23:48:19.93 -16:07:01.0   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22732_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22732_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    12.83    00:14:20.11 -21:55:50.4   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22735_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22735_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    12.85    23:44:43.07 -21:34:56.4   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22738_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22738_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    12.92    23:44:05.07 -15:15:59.3   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22913_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22913_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.24    23:45:23.28 -14:20:33.0   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22971_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 22971_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.37    00:18:28.76 -22:12:02.2   2190 5771   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.43    00:18:28.71 -22:12:02.4   2195 5770   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23156_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23156_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.33    23:55:13.69 -20:26:00.3   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23166_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23166_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.45    23:48:01.73 -14:07:07.5   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23216_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23216_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.53    00:18:25.89 -22:13:33.3   2198 5786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.46    00:18:25.90 -22:13:32.7   2202 5785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23261_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23261_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.66    00:13:51.34 -14:00:04.8   2750 0776   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23305_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23305_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.33    23:45:06.34 -17:34:23.5   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23308_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23308_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.92    00:06:23.88 -17:25:53.8   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23397_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23397_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.71    00:17:58.28 -20:05:38.0   2231 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.85    00:17:58.31 -20:05:37.5   2236 4485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23415_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23415_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.72    00:19:07.30 -21:07:53.8   2083 5123   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.72    00:19:07.50 -21:07:53.4   2087 5121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23430_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23430_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.70    00:18:55.28 -21:10:29.6   2112 5148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.91    00:18:55.36 -21:10:29.6   2116 5147   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23440_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23440_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.68    00:17:09.56 -21:53:46.9   2373 5580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.57    00:17:09.48 -21:53:48.0   2378 5579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23444_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23444_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.68    00:13:41.12 -18:24:02.9   2824 3446   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.69    00:13:41.14 -18:24:02.8   2828 3444   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23508_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23508_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.54    23:48:54.41 -22:05:47.1   6349 5675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.62    23:48:54.33 -22:05:47.1   6354 5674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23541_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23541_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.71    00:15:19.03 -21:29:11.4   2628 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.72    00:15:18.97 -21:29:13.9   2633 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23580_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23580_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.66    23:52:41.73 -22:07:15.4   5816 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.85    23:52:41.78 -22:07:17.8   5820 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23677_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23677_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.76    00:06:56.42 -22:09:34.5   3816 5708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    14.00    00:06:56.51 -22:09:33.6   3820 5707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23839_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23839_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.72    23:51:42.94 -21:59:25.4   5955 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.81    23:51:42.93 -21:59:26.0   5959 5604   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23845_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23845_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.73    23:48:02.51 -18:35:52.4   6502 3556   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.72    23:48:02.52 -18:35:53.5   6507 3555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23886_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23886_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 22.42147    2461274.92147    13.73    23:47:03.31 -22:13:15.1   6609 5756   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-06-45_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0194.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.82    23:47:03.31 -22:13:14.7   6613 5755   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23890_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 23890_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    13.73    23:50:22.65 -21:53:16.5   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    8.18    23:43:49.88 -15:17:08.3   7156 1558   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

**** FOUND  23:43:49.88 -15:17:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 22.42194    2461274.92194    11.36    00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.8   4480 1172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_051016_TTUQ2b1x1_624681_caOGNp0m/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_05-07-25_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0195.fits

**** FOUND  00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3
23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3
23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1
###################################################################################
23:51:37.44 -16:47:00.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:57:55.17 -16:51:33.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.92147483 -observatory V36
09:45:44.23 +15:16:28.4 Mercury (-1.7mag)
12:50:25.24 -07:48:24.7 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:30:03.26 +23:38:55.5 Mars (1.3mag)
08:55:33.45 +17:52:50.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:48.61 +03:01:27.6 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:02.52 +21:00:20.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:07.70 +00:06:14.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:50.27 -23:35:13.3 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:30:51.82 -28:22:39.4 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 05:13 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.92147483:
08:55:35.72 +17:52:40.0 Io (6.1mag)
08:55:41.69 +17:52:13.2 Europa (6.3mag)
08:55:49.85 +17:51:35.7 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:55:14.50 +17:54:19.6 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:53:01.69 +18:00:53.3 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:55:31.51 +17:53:00.0 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:52:40.95 +17:56:44.8 Elara (17.7mag)
08:59:41.01 +17:26:04.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:57:46.29 +18:06:26.6 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:44.68 +03:01:53.0 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:53.14 +03:01:19.7 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:24.08 +03:03:09.2 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:56.19 +03:01:44.8 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:53.30 +02:52:52.5 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 05:14 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.92147483:
20:12:07.19 -13:59:33.4 JWST
17:41:05.91 +33:26:54.5 Chandra
11:52:20.59 -61:21:48.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 05:13 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.92147483 -observatory V36
03:28:18.81 +18:26:44.3 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:54.70 -34:28:31.3 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:06:33.69 -69:29:36.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:09.40 +33:18:32.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:21:15.62 +42:25:31.1 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:26:40.54 +30:22:18.7 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:56:58.21 +26:16:56.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:46.11 +27:50:57.6 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:38:20.78 +05:17:58.9 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:15:41.04 -12:52:52.0 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:53:21.70 +64:03:37.2 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:36:26.56 -14:14:19.9 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:23:19.55 +32:00:57.2 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:42.18 +15:30:13.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:46:47.44 +43:29:22.8 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:49:18.69 +49:41:19.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:25:48.40 -12:53:58.1 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:04:38.72 +21:35:43.9 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:53:21.93 +19:57:12.0 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:07:26.50 +01:20:58.2 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:34.56 +76:16:53.6 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:55.40 +46:20:59.9 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:58:54.67 +09:56:01.5 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:12:27.40 -32:19:10.8 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:37:45.77 -04:19:30.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:36:32.54 +00:00:11.7 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:36.28 -06:06:22.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:06:55.09 +20:14:24.3 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:25:46.86 -25:00:18.3 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:12:01.93 +14:32:24.5 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:30:39.29 +25:34:35.4 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:47:45.69 +22:26:17.9 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:42:46.05 +28:17:11.6 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:51:47.92 +24:04:55.4 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:12:39.19 -15:37:43.7 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:56:50.36 +21:01:41.8 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:52:03.12 +18:05:48.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:59:36.06 +03:05:54.1 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:09:32.47 -18:37:26.8 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:03:49.23 +38:07:17.8 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:03:31.26 +29:50:38.0 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:06:16.07 +09:23:33.0 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:19.93 -51:48:04.9 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:03:27.05 +30:51:11.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:47:29.29 +37:05:03.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:16:13.10 +01:32:51.5 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:13:46.35 +17:39:52.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 05:13 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 05:13 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0  TCP J18030904+1218140  2026-08-19.5199  14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 05:13 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
11:27:30.457 +02:47:32.36  AT 2026xfu  2026-01-14.53 21.69
17:59:19.284 +29:24:54.02  AT 2026xft  2026-07-18.43 20.84
19:54:12.936 -24:01:35.76  AT 2026xfs  2026-05-17.56 19.77
08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05  AT 2026xfr  2026-01-14.38 20.4
23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71  AT 2026xfq  2026-07-19.57 21.15
20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98  AT 2026xfp  2026-07-14.44 20
13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50  AT 2026xfo  2026-06-23.28 20.85
23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94  AT 2026xfn  2026-07-25.52 21.28
10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73  AT 2026xfm  2026-01-27.58 21
21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98  AT 2026xfl  2026-07-16.55 21.68
14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18  AT 2026xfk  2026-06-13.34 20.9
02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80  AT 2026xfj  2026-01-17.24 21.98
20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94  AT 2026xfi  2026-05-20.56 20.93
21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85  AT 2026xfh  2026-06-19.58 20.9
20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34  AT 2026xfg  2026-07-19.45 20.74
14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07  AT 2026xff  2026-06-13.34 21.62
22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49  AT 2026xfe  2026-06-21.53 20.23
13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19  AT 2026xfd  2026-04-24.32 20.92
13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93  AT 2026xfc  2026-04-20.32 21.07
13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71  AT 2026xfb  2026-05-24.29 20.6
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 05:13 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Sat Aug 22 05:12:12 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 33s (0.55 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 1s (0.02 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 8s (0.13 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 26s (0.43 min)
FIELD_Cet-09-Q2b1x1: 71s (1.18 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 158s (2.63 min)
Finished: Sat Aug 22 05:14:50 CDT 2026