This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8956,6.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3956 6.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3956 2461274.8956 9.71 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3
188.66157 2.32312 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 4.7 pix
The object was found in VSX17" ZTF J061344.23+223438.6
Type: EA
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
17.727 r Y 0.556 r 2458457.77270 0.477039800000
NOTE: the measured brightness disagrees with the variable-star record above, but is consistent with the asteroid identification below - so this is likely the asteroid rather than an outburst of the variable.
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 -0 0 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J061344.23+223438.6,2461274.8956,9.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J061344.23+223438.6 20260822.3956 9.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3956 2461274.8956 11.24 05:58:53.23 +24:23:04.3
185.42608 0.23002 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 5.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope -3 0 3 12.2 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:53.23 +24:23:04.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:53.23 +24:23:04.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3956* 05 58 53.23 +24 23 04.3 11.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8956,11.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3956 11.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3956 2461274.8956 11.44 06:34:56.91 +22:45:01.7
190.78344 6.73843 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 4.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:56.91 +22:45:01.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:56.91 +22:45:01.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8956,11.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3956 11.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3956 2461274.8956 11.73 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9
194.36178 3.59735 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ASASSN-V J062955.21+180855.0
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
13.930 g Y 0.260 g 2458908.60300 36.490000000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J062955.21+180855.0,2461274.8956,11.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J062955.21+180855.0 20260822.3956 11.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461274.8956,6.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260822.3956 6.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461274.89580176 22.08.2026 09:29:47.272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16249
Objects passed selection criteria: 16148
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.2 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12512
Average stars matched: 10358.8 (82.7905 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248312 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:58:02 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461274.89580176 22.08.2026 09:29:47.272 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 124
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 23 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117237
Objects passed selection criteria: 116859
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 90629
Average stars matched: 79382 (87.5901 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 622932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:59:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.89534337
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.342 +21:57:58.50 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.342 +21:57:58.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0438 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 941.3'x624.6' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.456 +21:57:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.456 +21:57:57.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0470 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:43.342 +21:57:58.50
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:45.456 +21:57:57.74
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00817 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9yyVkXVyet
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ckVOzClUSa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gXDg0Ownlz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.atlePueZ2G
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
11.5 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
11.6 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 11.5 (SNR ) 9.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.9yyVkXVyet (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=6704, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 19960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1455 n_q2=895 n_q3=1550 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ckVOzClUSa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=7092, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 22011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1428 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gXDg0Ownlz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=65, bad_region=418, passed=2030
Got 2030 stars (including 1564 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2030 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 587 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1505 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1478 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1477 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1477 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.70"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 587 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1507 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1478 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.76"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1478 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1680 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.77"
Excluding outliers - 1478 stars left (next iteration limit 1624)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1478 robust_rms=6.217 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.571 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1478 robust_rms=0.751 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.932 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1478 robust_rms=0.630 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.810 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1478 robust_rms_before=1.820 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.749 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.630 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.958 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.810
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.375 +21:57:57.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2030 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3946693.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.820 -> 0.630 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits N_match=1478 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.623 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.906 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.620 n_q1=418 n_q2=388 n_q3=488 n_q4=184 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.atlePueZ2G (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=66, bad_region=425, passed=2067
Got 2067 stars (including 1589 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2067 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 587 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1530 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1503 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1499 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.71"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1502 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.72"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 587 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1530 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1503 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.79"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1503 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1713 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.81"
Excluding outliers - 1503 stars left (next iteration limit 1652)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1503 robust_rms=6.237 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.613 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1503 robust_rms=0.746 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.934 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1503 robust_rms=0.625 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.831 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1503 robust_rms_before=1.827 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.789 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.625 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=1.020 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.831
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.497 +21:57:56.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2067 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky3946702.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 1.827 -> 0.625 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=1503 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.645 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.555 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.892 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.586 n_q1=433 n_q2=379 n_q3=499 n_q4=192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.308
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.117
ref2=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits sigma_overall=0.655 worst_q_ratio=1.384
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits sigma_overall=0.683 worst_q_ratio=1.308
reference average sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.118
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4827 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158_astrometric_residuals.png (1478 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.52 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159_astrometric_residuals.png (1503 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3: 14.54 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=9.7082 delta=4.74 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38610.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 38607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15725_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 15725_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:57.94 +22:30:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 16070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:52.92 +22:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22718_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 22718_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:55.62 +25:07:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:13:44.31 +22:34:55.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:43.375 +21:57:57.45 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:43.375 +21:57:57.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0441 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Image size: 941.2'x624.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:45.497 +21:57:56.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:45.497 +21:57:56.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0474 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:43.375 +21:57:57.45
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:45.497 +21:57:56.64
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00820 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0qkcZhA9xP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6z8G6fKL4H
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mg7jsrw1OA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y6GvwJqccD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.723200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.723200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 48 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.0 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
2.1 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
12.4 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.4 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0qkcZhA9xP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=31903, bad_region=37736, passed=206254
Got 206254 stars (including 141027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1462 n_q2=892 n_q3=1535 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6z8G6fKL4H (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=29566, bad_region=30361, passed=188602
Got 188602 stars (including 132646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1389 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Mg7jsrw1OA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=595, bad_region=4683, passed=23458
Got 23458 stars (including 18273 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23458 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4753 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4753 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4750 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4752 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20090 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.65"
Excluding outliers - 4752 stars left (next iteration limit 5225)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=6.103 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=7.996 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=0.831 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.057 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4752 robust_rms=0.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.989 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4752 robust_rms_before=0.711 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.711 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.996 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.989
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.996 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits N_match=4752 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.721 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.693 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.599 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.014 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.678 n_q1=1325 n_q2=1401 n_q3=1356 n_q4=670 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.406
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y6GvwJqccD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=583, bad_region=4662, passed=23357
Got 23357 stars (including 18170 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23357 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013072 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010458 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4758 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.66"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4755 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.63"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4756 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20008 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.67"
Excluding outliers - 4756 stars left (next iteration limit 5230)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=6.205 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.379 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=0.829 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.052 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4756 robust_rms=0.723 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.000 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4756 robust_rms_before=0.731 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.716 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.829 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=1.018 worst_quadrant_rms_after=1.052
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 1.018 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits N_match=4756 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.705 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.718 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.545 sigma_q3_arcsec=1.030 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.567 n_q1=1316 n_q2=1400 n_q3=1354 n_q4=686 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.461
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-07_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0158.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_045417_TTUQ2b1x1_3861513_P0dkKrU3/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.54 +23:55:56.9: 12.12 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:36.50 +25:48:48.8: 10.41 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:17.0: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:45:11.30 +22:06:09.2: 11.45 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:15.57 +18:46:39.8: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:41.36 +20:24:35.5: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:53.23 +24:23:04.3: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.54 +23:55:56.9: 12.04 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:36.50 +25:48:48.8: 10.22 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.08 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.30 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.54 +23:55:56.9: ref_mag=12.08 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0246 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:33:36.50 +25:48:48.8: ref_mag=10.30 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4911 delta=-1.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:17.0: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:45:11.30 +22:06:09.2: 11.29 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:17.0: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4110 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.36 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:45:11.30 +22:06:09.2: ref_mag=11.36 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.2143 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:15.57 +18:46:39.8: 11.61 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:15.57 +18:46:39.8: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8827 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:41.36 +20:24:35.5: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:41.36 +20:24:35.5: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6307 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:53.23 +24:23:04.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:34:56.91 +22:45:01.7: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9: 12.66 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:22.17 +25:40:34.6: 11.67 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:34:56.91 +22:45:01.7: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.61 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:29:55.21 +18:08:54.9: ref_mag=12.61 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6983 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:22.17 +25:40:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.67 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:22.17 +25:40:34.6: ref_mag=11.67 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.8085 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117991.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25930.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261159.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261037_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261037_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:30.28 +24:19:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261040_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261040_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261053_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261053_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261056_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261056_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:32.93 +22:20:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.37 +17:47:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:04.20 +23:52:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261061_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261061_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:36.46 +19:26:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261068_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261068_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261070_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261085_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261085_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261092_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261092_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261101_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261101_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261118_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261118_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261131_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261132_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261132_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.51 +20:10:37.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261137_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261137_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261151_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261151_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261152_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261152_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261162_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261162_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261163_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261163_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261180_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261180_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261186_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261186_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261194_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 261194_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 64478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:27.42 +19:41:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 138130_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 138130_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.66 +23:15:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 188185_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:55.63 +25:07:46.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117991_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 117991_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25930_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 25930_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118694_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 118694_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:44.32 +22:34:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136082_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
Preparing report for the candidate 136082_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.77 +18:15:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29540_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 29540_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46667_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 46667_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 172480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 172480_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121764_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 121764_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:57.94 +22:30:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72726_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 72726_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:57.77 +20:12:45.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123712_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 123712_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:52.92 +22:30:22.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 52412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:50.80 +19:09:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114829_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 114829_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:32.61 +22:11:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 200488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:32.48 +24:25:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 169600_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 169600_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:52.87 +25:46:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 132395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:44.07 +23:06:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120938_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 120938_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:41.60 +22:24:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74316_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159
The candidate 74316_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-22_04-29-47_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0159 did not pass the final checks
