This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.04 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3
71.21563 26.77416 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.326+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 03 31.18 +44 14 31.3 12.0 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.32 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6
70.07067 26.08976 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx777870 | 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 05 54.16 +43 05 13.6 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx777870,2461274.8740,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx777870 20260822.3740 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.45 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3
75.45967 27.46257 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.729+/-0.028 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 04 07.45 +48 04 48.3 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.61 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7
74.06577 26.92773 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F9 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.381+/-0.035 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 05 46.13 +46 45 31.7 12.6 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.50 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8
74.81480 23.14683 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx854121 | 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8 (user input) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.283+/-0.037 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx854121,2461274.8740,12.50,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx854121 20260822.3740 12.50CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.45 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7
74.87706 28.33630 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 17 58 26.09 +47 44 03.7 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.46 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3
78.48309 29.78055 galactic Dra Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 2.3 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" ZTF J175236.97+510411.6
Type: BY
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.019 g Y 0.042 g 2458284.79970 15.695642600000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J175236.97+510411.6,2461274.8740,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J175236.97+510411.6 20260822.3740 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.42 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8
76.47623 27.85082 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G3 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.367+/-0.032 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 02 49.22 +49 02 11.8 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.46 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9
77.80608 28.63625 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.1" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.322+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 17 59 14.47 +50 19 21.9 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.45 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3
72.56273 27.24808 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F2 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.327+/-0.028 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 02 21.64 +45 30 57.3 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.35 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1
77.20657 29.91863 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.429+/-0.033 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 17 50 50.87 +49 59 24.1 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.46 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9
76.37219 28.22712 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.743+/-0.032 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 00 27.74 +49 00 42.9 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.36 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9
72.78525 26.80034 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.354+/-0.037 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 05 06.01 +45 36 54.9 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.40 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4
73.21887 27.62783 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.553+/-0.026 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 00 54.22 +46 09 47.4 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.36 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8
73.31759 27.18337 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.309+/-0.031 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 03 31.19 +46 09 33.8 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.40 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2
74.57544 27.60293 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J270.6001+47.3380 | 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 02 24.86 +47 20 14.2 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J270.6001+47.3380,2461274.8740,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J270.6001+47.3380 20260822.3740 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.44 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6
76.57296 28.48431 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.0" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.727+/-0.034 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 17 59 05.67 +49 13 45.6 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.35 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1
75.77724 28.38779 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J269.7398+48.5236 | 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 17 58 57.44 +48 31 24.1 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J269.7398+48.5236,2461274.8740,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J269.7398+48.5236 20260822.3740 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.34 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3
73.99165 27.71826 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 01 09.91 +46 51 07.3 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.29 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2
72.83820 26.96510 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx1712236 | 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2 (user input) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 04 14.18 +45 41 47.2 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx1712236,2461274.8740,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx1712236 20260822.3740 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.39 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8
75.75680 27.91933 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: F5 (LAMOST DR5)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 01 43.24 +48 25 23.8 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.36 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5
73.49527 26.90647 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.354+/-0.030 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 05 16.51 +46 15 24.5 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.40 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8
76.29733 27.80330 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.285+/-0.029 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 02 55.96 +48 52 20.8 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.38 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3
74.33479 27.04964 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 2.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.242+/-0.031 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 05 21.46 +47 01 06.3 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.32 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4
76.00388 28.01828 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.584+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 01 22.09 +48 39 20.4 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.25 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2
75.05432 27.61804 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.367+/-0.029 (G)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 02 48.35 +47 45 24.2 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.29 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0
70.42560 25.92380 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.617+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 07 12.23 +43 21 27.0 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.29,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.29CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.19 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3
74.97692 27.48352 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.603+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 03 30.78 +47 39 49.3 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.06 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3
69.68373 19.63670 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 2110579059908299264 | 18:38:39.64 +40:54:14.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.741+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 2110579059908299264,2461274.8740,12.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 2110579059908299264 20260822.3740 12.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.15 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3
73.18955 26.91881 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.772+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 04 52.52 +45 59 34.3 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.15,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.15CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.11 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7
73.85682 27.60532 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 01 40.62 +46 42 46.7 12.1 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 11.88 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0
69.65523 19.55377 galactic Lyr Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 2.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J279.7570+40.8505 | 18:39:01.68 +40:51:01.9 (Gaia DR3) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.548+/-0.027 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J279.7570+40.8505,2461274.8740,11.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J279.7570+40.8505 20260822.3740 11.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 11.97 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2
69.88295 25.54271 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 2.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.304+/-0.031 (F)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 08 34.79 +42 47 27.2 12.0 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,11.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 11.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3740 2461274.8740 12.62 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9
71.90196 26.83373 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.6" and 3.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.598+/-0.030 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3740* 18 03 56.90 +44 51 09.9 12.6 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8740,12.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3740 12.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461202.85845161 11.06.2026 08:36:00.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461202.85845161 11.06.2026 08:36:00.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461274.87420594 22.08.2026 08:58:41.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 1
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15384
Objects passed selection criteria: 15296
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9144.5
Average stars matched: 8886.5 (97.1786 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 240820 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:01:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461202.85845161 11.06.2026 08:36:00.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
First image: 2461202.85845161 11.06.2026 08:36:00.219 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Last image: 2461274.87420594 22.08.2026 08:58:41.393 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 174
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 90352
Objects passed selection criteria: 90005
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 58500.2
Average stars matched: 56022.2 (95.7641 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 473064 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 04:02:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.87370484
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.258 +46:00:04.75 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.258 +46:00:04.75
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0281 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 942.0'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.158 +45:59:49.92 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.158 +45:59:49.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0285 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:09.258 +46:00:04.75
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:09.158 +45:59:49.92
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00413 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QHzcELabWf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4jkG31x2xW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KB5dHEnPh1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NexxJxkMr1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16316 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.8561 to 282.3860 deg, Dec +40.2652 to +51.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.8561 to 282.3860 deg, Dec 40.2652 to 51.2658 deg
Loaded 10677 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7778 out of 8223 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8223 out of 16316 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.717650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.717650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16316 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.8561 to 282.3860 deg, Dec +40.2652 to +51.2658 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.8561 to 282.3860 deg, Dec 40.2652 to 51.2658 deg
Loaded 10677 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7778 out of 8223 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8223 out of 16316 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=6.4)
Read 16412 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.8561 to 282.3861 deg, Dec +40.2652 to +51.2597 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.8561 to 282.3861 deg, Dec 40.2652 to 51.2597 deg
Loaded 10672 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7752 out of 8227 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8227 out of 16412 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=6.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.3 pix Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.1 pix fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.1 pix fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.3 mag. Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
12.1 mag. fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.1 (SNR ) 10.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QHzcELabWf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1090, bad_region=1, passed=16316
Got 16316 stars (including 15205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16316 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4894 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4894 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4902 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16316 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 4895 stars left (next iteration limit 5383)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4895 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.451 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.505 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=1338 n_q2=1103 n_q3=1276 n_q4=1178 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4jkG31x2xW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1171, bad_region=0, passed=16412
Got 16412 stars (including 15225 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16412 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4904 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16412 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.502 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1341 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1289 n_q4=1164 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.132
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KB5dHEnPh1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=60, bad_region=0, passed=2004
Got 2004 stars (including 1942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2004 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1990 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 1885 stars left (next iteration limit 2073)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1885 robust_rms=6.766 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1885 robust_rms=0.397 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1885 robust_rms=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.360 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1885 robust_rms_before=0.625 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.417 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.331 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.477 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.360
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.223 +46:00:04.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2004 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky669056.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.625 -> 0.331 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=1885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.385 n_q1=545 n_q2=405 n_q3=639 n_q4=296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.061
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NexxJxkMr1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=54, bad_region=0, passed=2060
Got 2060 stars (including 2004 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2060 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1934 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2049 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2052 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 1944 stars left (next iteration limit 2138)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=1944 robust_rms=6.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.752 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=1944 robust_rms=0.413 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.452 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=1944 robust_rms=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.376 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=1944 robust_rms_before=0.599 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.346 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.495 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.376
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.122 +45:59:49.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 2060 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky668879.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.599 -> 0.346 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=1944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.405 n_q1=571 n_q2=402 n_q3=671 n_q4=300 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.451 worst_q_ratio=1.120
ref2=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.461 worst_q_ratio=1.132
new1=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits sigma_overall=0.363 worst_q_ratio=1.061
new2=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits sigma_overall=0.352 worst_q_ratio=1.149
reference average sigma_overall=0.456 worst_q_ratio=1.126
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4895 matched stars from wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098_astrometric_residuals.png (1885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099_astrometric_residuals.png (1944 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21004_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 21004_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:00.42 +42:52:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Her-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Image size: 937.4'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.223 +46:00:04.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.223 +46:00:04.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0280 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Image size: 942.1'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:00:09.122 +45:59:49.97 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 17:59:59.602 +46:00:14.17
Second-epoch image center 18:00:09.122 +45:59:49.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0284 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:00:09.223 +46:00:04.83
Second-epoch second image center 18:00:09.122 +45:59:49.97
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00414 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1ir9PgfSY6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lav2jb6Yc4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits &> /tmp/tmp.styuvl5UL8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yGri3POKt1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 98455 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.6955 to 282.3968 deg, Dec +40.2518 to +51.2702 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.6955 to 282.3968 deg, Dec 40.2518 to 51.2702 deg
Loaded 10772 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6818 out of 8301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8301 out of 98455 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.594100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.594100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.10
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.49
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 98455 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.6955 to 282.3968 deg, Dec +40.2518 to +51.2702 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.6955 to 282.3968 deg, Dec 40.2518 to 51.2702 deg
Loaded 10772 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6818 out of 8301 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8301 out of 98455 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (aperture=4.9)
Read 99821 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 257.7124 to 282.3968 deg, Dec +40.2384 to +51.2598 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 257.7124 to 282.3968 deg, Dec 40.2384 to 51.2598 deg
Loaded 10773 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6764 out of 8294 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 8294 out of 99821 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 163 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
2.1 pix Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
2.1 pix fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
2.1 pix fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
15.5 mag. Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
12.8 mag. fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.8 (SNR ) 12.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.1ir9PgfSY6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=70, blended=7914, bad_region=2, passed=98385
Got 98385 stars (including 90333 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 98385 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.3 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4896 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 98385 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1321 n_q2=1164 n_q3=1208 n_q4=1197 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lav2jb6Yc4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=61, blended=8168, bad_region=0, passed=99760
Got 99760 stars (including 91442 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 651 to 708 (Dec 40.2 to 51.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99760 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.453 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.519 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.490 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.474 n_q1=1321 n_q2=1142 n_q3=1234 n_q4=1194 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.styuvl5UL8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=255, bad_region=26, passed=18852
Got 18852 stars (including 18546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18852 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4887 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4886 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18851 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4870 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=6.416 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.082 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.452 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.498 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4870 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.436 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4870 robust_rms_before=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.412 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.436 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.436
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.436 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits N_match=4870 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.429 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.471 n_q1=1570 n_q2=989 n_q3=1590 n_q4=721 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yGri3POKt1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=270, bad_region=26, passed=18743
Got 18743 stars (including 18426 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18743 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013085 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010468 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4868 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 649 to 708 (Dec 39.9 to 51.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4880 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18741 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5354)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=6.175 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.526 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.466 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4868 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.426 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4868 robust_rms_before=0.398 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.434 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.426
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.434 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.464 n_q1=1596 n_q2=966 n_q3=1613 n_q4=693 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:11.88 +50:30:08.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:59:34.34 +50:20:05.0: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:11.88 +50:30:08.3: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:59:34.34 +50:20:05.0: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.80 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:59:34.34 +50:20:05.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6727 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:05:11.88 +50:30:08.3: ref_mag=12.80 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4120 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:45:04.67 +46:07:11.1: 11.63 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:58:41.43 +45:30:00.3: 12.31 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:45:04.67 +46:07:11.1: 11.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:00:55.49 +47:24:20.5: 12.75 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:45:04.67 +46:07:11.1: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9985 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:58:41.43 +45:30:00.3: 12.36 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.33 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:58:41.43 +45:30:00.3: ref_mag=12.33 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8214 delta=0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:00:55.49 +47:24:20.5: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.77 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:00:55.49 +47:24:20.5: ref_mag=12.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9396 delta=0.83 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:07:20.22 +43:26:02.6: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:41.39 +41:22:46.7: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:07:20.22 +43:26:02.6: 12.93 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:07:20.22 +43:26:02.6: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1008 delta=0.84 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:41.39 +41:22:46.7: 12.67 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:41.39 +41:22:46.7: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3948 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3: 12.92 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7: 13.70 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3: 12.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9892 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8: 13.67 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7: 13.59 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3141 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.68 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7: ref_mag=13.68 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5802 delta=1.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4416 delta=0.98 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8: 13.53 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3: 13.49 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.63 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8: ref_mag=13.63 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.5002 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7: 13.55 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4378 delta=1.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4427 delta=1.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4103 delta=1.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4090 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4363 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3436 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9: 13.51 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4301 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9: 13.45 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3550 delta=1.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4075 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3620 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3937 delta=1.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6: 13.36 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4242 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3452 delta=1.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3283 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2866 delta=1.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8: 13.26 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3150 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5: 13.31 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3360 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3929 delta=0.91 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3: 13.29 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3699 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3168 delta=0.96 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2: 13.23 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2: 13.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2450 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0: 13.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2884 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3: 13.14 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3: 13.13 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1849 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0566 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1337 delta=0.93 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1056 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0: 12.79 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.8812 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2: 12.82 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8996 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-00_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits at 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9: 14.01 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-06-11_03-36-44_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0265.fits at 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6010 delta=1.38 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01564.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out07773.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out10492.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out17356.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19035.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19375.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22712.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out23968.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out24871.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out28107.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31336.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out31699.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32257.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out35585.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38668.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40432.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41314.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41321.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out41850.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out46268.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47331.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out47348.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out48976.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51807.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52797.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53803.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64717.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out71527.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out83825.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out86067.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out88574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out95785.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1411s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 18s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117658_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117658_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117662_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117662_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:30:01.61 +49:18:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117665_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117665_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117666_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117666_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:40:51.95 +47:06:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117683_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117683_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117692_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117692_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117697_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117697_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117710_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117710_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117721_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117721_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117725_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117725_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117729_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117729_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117735_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117735_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117737_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117737_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:33:56.50 +41:21:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117754_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117754_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117760_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117760_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:17:07.56 +43:08:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117793_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117793_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117807_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117807_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:55.26 +41:13:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117813_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117813_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117819_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117819_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117823_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117823_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117838_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117838_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117848_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117848_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117851_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117851_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117853_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117853_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117860_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117860_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117862_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117862_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117863_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117863_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117867_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117867_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117871_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117871_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117874_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117874_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:36:49.18 +43:14:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117878_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117878_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117881_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117881_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117885_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117885_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117891_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117891_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117898_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117898_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117899_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117899_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117900_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117900_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117902_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117902_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117908_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117908_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117913_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117913_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117916_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117916_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117920_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117920_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117921_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117921_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:50.14 +42:14:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117924_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117924_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117926_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117926_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117928_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117928_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117937_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117937_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:39:36.35 +46:01:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117939_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117939_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:21:40.86 +49:05:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117944_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117944_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117945_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117945_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117954_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117954_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117963_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117963_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117970_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117970_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117975_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117975_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117980_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117980_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117981_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117981_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117982_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117982_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117991_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117991_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117992_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117992_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117997_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117997_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117998_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 117998_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118001_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118001_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118004_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118004_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118010_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118010_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118011_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118011_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118015_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118015_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118018_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118018_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118020_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118020_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118027_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118027_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118035_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118035_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118039_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118039_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118041_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118041_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118054_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118054_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118062_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118062_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118065_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118065_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118071_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118071_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118075_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118075_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118078_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118078_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118097_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118097_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118109_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118109_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118111_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118111_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118113_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118113_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118116_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118116_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118126_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118126_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118132_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118132_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118137_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118137_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118148_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118148_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118150_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118150_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118156_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118156_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118162_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118162_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118169_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118169_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118172_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118172_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118177_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118177_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118185_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118185_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118188_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118188_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118190_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118190_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:43:07.86 +44:06:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118203_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118203_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118208_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118208_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118210_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118210_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118218_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118218_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118226_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118226_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118235_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118235_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118236_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118236_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118246_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118246_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118247_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118247_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118256_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118256_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118259_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118259_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118261_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118261_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118263_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118263_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118264_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118264_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118268_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118268_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118270_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118270_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118273_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118273_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118278_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118278_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118279_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118279_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118283_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 118283_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95785_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 95785_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 86067_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 86067_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28107_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 28107_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41321_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 41321_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114277_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 114277_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85144_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 85144_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113870_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 113870_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113286_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 113286_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41314_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 41314_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31699_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 31699_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01564_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 01564_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19035_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 19035_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07773_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 07773_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 53803_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84148_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 84148_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:56:00.41 +42:52:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109808_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 109808_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10492_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 10492_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19375_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 19375_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52797_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 52797_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47348_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 47348_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47331_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 47331_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35585_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 35585_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65287_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 65287_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:58:09.25 +41:25:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17356_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 17356_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23968_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 23968_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40432_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 40432_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51807_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 51807_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24871_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 24871_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 46268_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 46268_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20604_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 20604_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38668_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 38668_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22712_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 22712_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31336_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 31336_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48450_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 48450_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 88574_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 88574_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32257_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 32257_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64717_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 64717_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 48976_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 48976_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41850_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 41850_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64303_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 64303_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83825_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 83825_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04587_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 04587_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:54.80 +50:31:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84791_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 84791_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:09.73 +42:33:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37043_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 37043_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21304_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 21304_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 71527_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
Preparing report for the candidate 71527_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65555_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099
The candidate 65555_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1432s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Her-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3
Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-02-Q1b1x1_035915_TTUQ1b1x1_567404_rPtuneVw/monitoring_positions.txt
Read 18853 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2854 to 282.7199 deg, Dec +39.8612 to +51.3911 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2854 to 282.7199 deg, Dec 39.8612 to 51.3911 deg
Loaded 11302 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7690 out of 7823 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7823 out of 18853 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461274.87370 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 270.03970 deg Dec= +46.00212 deg
Frame center: alt= +21.542 deg az= 306.617 deg airmass= 2.7005
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 21.611 deg (difference -0.068 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.6983 (we compute 2.7005)
Airmass zero-point fit: REJECT_K_RANGE k= +0.6133 +/- 0.0114 mag/airmass N= 5021 airmass span 1.9529-4.4162 scatter 0.3790 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-57-58_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0098.fits: REJECT_K_RANGE +1.629573 -0.613343 2.7005 +0.6133 5021 2.4633 0.3790 1.9529 4.4162
Read 18747 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 258.2855 to 282.7194 deg, Dec +39.8611 to +51.3904 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 258.2855 to 282.7194 deg, Dec 39.8611 to 51.3904 deg
Loaded 11301 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7679 out of 7804 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7804 out of 18747 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461274.87421 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 270.03928 deg Dec= +45.99799 deg
Frame center: alt= +21.428 deg az= 306.672 deg airmass= 2.7139
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 21.497 deg (difference -0.069 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.7117 (we compute 2.7139)
Airmass zero-point fit: OK k= +0.5934 +/- 0.0120 mag/airmass N= 5031 airmass span 1.9514-4.3994 scatter 0.3943 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_Her-02-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-58-41_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0099.fits: OK +1.578234 -0.593407 2.7139 +0.5934 5031 2.4480 0.3943 1.9514 4.3994
########### Completed Her-02-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9
###################################################################################
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1 -- not a known variable star
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3 -- a known variable star
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7 -- not a known variable star
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1 -- not a known variable star
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6 -- not a known variable star
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9 -- not a known variable star
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9 -- not a known variable star
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4 -- not a known variable star
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3 -- not a known variable star
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4 -- not a known variable star
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7 -- not a known variable star
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8 -- not a known variable star
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3 -- not a known variable star
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2 -- not a known variable star
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2 -- not a known variable star
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8 -- not a known variable star
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8 -- not a known variable star
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3 -- not a known variable star
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3 -- not a known variable star
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8 -- not a known variable star
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9 -- not a known variable star
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3 -- not a known variable star
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2 -- not a known variable star
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3 -- not a known variable star
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9 -- not a known variable star
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5 -- not a known variable star
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3 -- not a known variable star
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7 -- not a known variable star
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6 -- not a known variable star
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0 -- not a known variable star
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2 -- not a known variable star
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8 -- not a known variable star
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3 -- not a known variable star
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0 -- not a known variable star
Found 33 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
34 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
17:50:50.87 +49:59:24.1
17:52:36.97 +51:04:11.3
17:58:26.09 +47:44:03.7
17:58:57.44 +48:31:24.1
17:59:05.67 +49:13:45.6
17:59:14.47 +50:19:21.9
18:00:27.74 +49:00:42.9
18:00:54.22 +46:09:47.4
18:01:09.91 +46:51:07.3
18:01:22.09 +48:39:20.4
18:01:40.62 +46:42:46.7
18:01:43.24 +48:25:23.8
18:02:21.64 +45:30:57.3
18:02:24.86 +47:20:14.2
18:02:48.35 +47:45:24.2
18:02:49.22 +49:02:11.8
18:02:55.96 +48:52:20.8
18:03:30.78 +47:39:49.3
18:03:31.18 +44:14:31.3
18:03:31.19 +46:09:33.8
18:03:56.90 +44:51:09.9
18:04:07.45 +48:04:48.3
18:04:14.18 +45:41:47.2
18:04:52.52 +45:59:34.3
18:05:06.01 +45:36:54.9
18:05:16.51 +46:15:24.5
18:05:21.46 +47:01:06.3
18:05:46.13 +46:45:31.7
18:05:54.16 +43:05:13.6
18:07:12.23 +43:21:27.0
18:08:34.79 +42:47:27.2
18:28:06.45 +46:31:00.8
18:38:39.66 +40:54:13.3
18:39:01.66 +40:51:03.0
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.87370484 -observatory V36
09:45:21.40 +15:18:15.8 Mercury (-1.7mag)
12:50:15.93 -07:47:05.9 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:29:55.15 +23:38:58.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:55:30.92 +17:53:00.4 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:49.07 +03:01:31.1 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:02.33 +21:00:19.4 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:07.93 +00:06:15.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:50.53 -23:35:12.4 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:28:00.85 -28:28:18.6 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 04:01 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.87370484:
08:55:34.22 +17:52:45.1 Io (6.1mag)
08:55:38.56 +17:52:25.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:55:47.13 +17:51:46.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:55:11.66 +17:54:30.9 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:52:59.16 +18:01:01.4 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:55:29.57 +17:53:07.3 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:52:38.40 +17:56:53.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:59:38.51 +17:26:15.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:57:43.97 +18:06:35.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:45.37 +03:01:56.5 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:53.67 +03:01:22.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:24.52 +03:03:12.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:56.85 +03:01:47.9 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:53.82 +02:52:56.3 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 04:01 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.87370484:
20:11:56.70 -14:02:41.5 JWST
17:35:47.57 +34:50:09.9 Chandra
11:16:25.98 -60:08:50.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 04:01 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.87370484 -observatory V36
03:28:16.24 +18:26:32.7 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:54.63 -34:28:34.1 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:06:31.21 -69:29:27.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:08.82 +33:18:28.6 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:21:09.23 +42:24:45.5 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:26:43.00 +30:22:34.6 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:56:55.63 +26:16:59.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:43.42 +27:51:04.8 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:38:18.87 +05:17:59.4 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:15:40.20 -12:52:44.4 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:53:24.87 +64:04:05.7 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:36:28.28 -14:14:04.5 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:23:16.62 +32:00:48.4 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:42.21 +15:30:15.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:46:50.36 +43:29:22.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:49:23.05 +49:41:19.1 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:25:46.42 -12:53:57.7 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:04:37.20 +21:36:15.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:53:17.62 +19:57:24.2 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:07:24.43 +01:21:11.0 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:30.86 +76:17:15.6 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:55.54 +46:20:59.4 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:58:52.11 +09:55:46.0 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:12:25.13 -32:18:25.2 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:37:43.92 -04:19:18.2 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:36:26.69 +00:01:07.6 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:37.22 -06:06:12.8 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:06:48.97 +20:14:32.1 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:25:49.11 -25:00:03.5 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:12:00.32 +14:32:16.6 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:30:32.59 +25:35:02.1 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:47:37.04 +22:25:09.5 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:42:36.90 +28:17:42.1 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:51:41.26 +24:05:28.2 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:12:33.16 -15:36:40.1 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:56:46.43 +21:01:44.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:51:58.55 +18:05:59.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:59:37.17 +03:06:00.0 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:09:36.26 -18:37:33.2 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:03:39.93 +38:07:18.3 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:04:01.61 +29:54:37.8 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:06:12.10 +09:23:38.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:20.44 -51:48:28.4 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:03:18.87 +30:50:06.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:47:20.97 +37:05:14.1 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:16:11.68 +01:33:11.0 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:13:43.76 +17:40:01.3 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 04:01 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 04:01 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 04:01 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4
23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15
20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20
13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85
23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28
10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21
21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68
14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9
02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98
20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93
21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9
20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74
14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62
22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23
13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92
13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07
13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6
20:02:32.611 -29:31:03.47 AT 2026xfa 2026-06-16.52 19.85
21:35:00.881 +03:50:25.49 AT 2026xez 2026-07-16.55 21.5
08:33:56.550 +06:59:43.01 AT 2026xey 2026-01-24.36 22.17
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 04:01 tns_transients_list.txt
