This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.10 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7
46.69885 18.01193 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J272.3102+20.0340 | 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: K1 1985ApJS...59..197B LTT 15367
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 09 14.60 +20 01 25.7 12.1 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J272.3102+20.0340,2461274.8631,12.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J272.3102+20.0340 20260822.3631 12.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.35 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8
47.41513 18.49305 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 08 28.97 +20 50 15.8 12.3 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8631,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3631 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.47 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5
47.70591 19.51845 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) SpType: G5 (LAMOST DR5) J-Ks=0.627+/-0.029 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 04 52.44 +21 29 06.5 12.5 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8631,12.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3631 12.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.41 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3
47.18482 17.12497 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx3848240 | 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3 (user input) | (GCVS) | (GCVS) | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.739+/-0.033 (K)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 13 29.52 +20 06 02.3 12.4 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx3848240,2461274.8631,12.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx3848240 20260822.3631 12.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.18 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7
54.66439 9.39486 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASAS J185646+2333.0
Type: ED
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.241 V Y 0.645 V 2452727.66000 1.940700000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 56 45.73 +23 33 00.7 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASAS J185646+2333.0,2461274.8631,12.18,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASAS J185646+2333.0 20260822.3631 12.18CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.21 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0
53.79833 10.87865 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J184919.39+232449.6
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.620 r Y 0.455 r 2458285.00990 62.171112100000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 49 19.37 +23 24 49.0 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J184919.39+232449.6,2461274.8631,12.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J184919.39+232449.6 20260822.3631 12.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.16 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5
45.87914 17.19615 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.9" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 11 06.81 +18 59 01.5 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461274.8631,12.16,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260822.3631 12.16CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.20 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2
46.23436 17.45096 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | DocumentRef: VOTx4014338 | 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2 (user input) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (VSX @ VizieR) | (position from user input)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 10 41.61 +19 23 46.2 12.2 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
DocumentRef: VOTx4014338,2461274.8631,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
DocumentRef: VOTx4014338 20260822.3631 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 12.00 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7
46.23363 17.65238 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 4527434118883435648 | 18:09:54.77 +19:29:03.4 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 09 54.46 +19 28 30.7 12.0 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 4527434118883435648,2461274.8631,12.00,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 4527434118883435648 20260822.3631 12.00CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 22.3631 2461274.8631 11.75 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3
49.31422 13.07698 galactic Her Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" GH Her
Type: M
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
11.733 V Y 1.384 V 231.645715000000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 22.3631* 18 32 49.03 +20 20 43.3 11.8 U Her 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
GH Her,2461274.8631,11.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
GH Her 20260822.3631 11.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.88061436 12.06.2026 09:07:55.081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461203.88061436 12.06.2026 09:07:55.081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461274.86354660 22.08.2026 08:43:20.426 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 24443
Objects passed selection criteria: 24279
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.3 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14913.5
Average stars matched: 14430 (96.758 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248908 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 03:49:58 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461203.88061436 12.06.2026 09:07:55.081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
First image: 2461203.88061436 12.06.2026 09:07:55.081 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Last image: 2461274.86354660 22.08.2026 08:43:20.426 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 81
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 175210
Objects passed selection criteria: 174637
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.4 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 116396
Average stars matched: 111802 (96.0531 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 572968 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Thu Aug 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-192-g23359006
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Aug 22 03:51:50 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.86262400
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63
Second-epoch image center 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63
Second-epoch image center 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80
Second-epoch second image center 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ygKrEZABlu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2cPrDKe5GP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Dl536T41Ni
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Boh8NUFZ1h
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1929 to 285.6819 deg, Dec +16.6039 to +27.2662 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1929 to 285.6819 deg, Dec 16.6039 to 27.2662 deg
Loaded 17314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12962 out of 14003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14003 out of 26092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.734600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.734600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.55
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.18
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1929 to 285.6819 deg, Dec +16.6039 to +27.2662 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1929 to 285.6819 deg, Dec 16.6039 to 27.2662 deg
Loaded 17314 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 12962 out of 14003 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14003 out of 26092 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 26305 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1933 to 285.6671 deg, Dec +16.6125 to +27.2750 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1933 to 285.6671 deg, Dec 16.6125 to 27.2750 deg
Loaded 17301 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 13018 out of 14034 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14034 out of 26305 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.2 pix Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.2 pix fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.2 pix fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
15.2 mag. Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ygKrEZABlu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2085, bad_region=0, passed=26092
Got 26092 stars (including 23976 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4942 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4942 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4942 stars left (next iteration limit 5436)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4942 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.443 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.655 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.527 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.634 n_q1=1335 n_q2=1073 n_q3=1259 n_q4=1275 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.176
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2cPrDKe5GP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2119, bad_region=1, passed=26305
Got 26305 stars (including 24169 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26305 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4944 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4944 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26305 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4944 stars left (next iteration limit 5438)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4944 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.658 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.637 n_q1=1339 n_q2=1062 n_q3=1279 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.233
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Dl536T41Ni (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=125, bad_region=0, passed=3771
Got 3771 stars (including 3641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3771 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3602 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3603 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3585 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3769 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 3585 stars left (next iteration limit 3943)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3585 robust_rms=9.713 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.624 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3585 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.661 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3585 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3585 robust_rms_before=0.751 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.423 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.474 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.517
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.474 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=3585 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.448 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.457 n_q1=1251 n_q2=863 n_q3=706 n_q4=765 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.084
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Boh8NUFZ1h (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=126, bad_region=0, passed=3798
Got 3798 stars (including 3669 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3798 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3634 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3616 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3612 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3616 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 589 (Dec 16.2 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3634 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3614 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3614 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3794 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 3614 stars left (next iteration limit 3977)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3614 robust_rms=9.166 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3614 robust_rms=0.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.659 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3614 robust_rms=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3614 robust_rms_before=0.724 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.429 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.448 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.489 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.489 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=3614 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.449 n_q1=1253 n_q2=797 n_q3=750 n_q4=814 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.160
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits sigma_overall=0.557 worst_q_ratio=1.176
ref2=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits sigma_overall=0.534 worst_q_ratio=1.233
new1=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits sigma_overall=0.422 worst_q_ratio=1.084
new2=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits sigma_overall=0.420 worst_q_ratio=1.160
reference average sigma_overall=0.5455 worst_q_ratio=1.2045
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224_astrometric_residuals.png (4942 matched stars from wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.49 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225_astrometric_residuals.png (4944 matched stars from wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084_astrometric_residuals.png (3585 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085_astrometric_residuals.png (3614 matched stars from wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.39 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31870_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 31870_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:58.60 +25:07:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16332_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 16332_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:54.01 +20:27:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Her-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63
Second-epoch image center 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0218 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Image size: 942.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 18:27:41.537 +22:00:15.63
Second-epoch image center 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0213 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 18:27:47.082 +22:00:30.80
Second-epoch second image center 18:27:46.724 +21:59:49.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01163 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KBN9XaXhmd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p2pPIKwSP8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qice2ONkbo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LZroa7n3Vf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits and wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits) and catalog (wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 194201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1742 to 285.6863 deg, Dec +16.5978 to +27.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1742 to 285.6863 deg, Dec 16.5978 to 27.2681 deg
Loaded 17340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10476 out of 14339 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14339 out of 194201 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.580500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.580500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.35
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 194201 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1742 to 285.6863 deg, Dec +16.5978 to +27.2681 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1742 to 285.6863 deg, Dec 16.5978 to 27.2681 deg
Loaded 17340 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10476 out of 14339 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14339 out of 194201 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 192027 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 268.1511 to 285.6799 deg, Dec +16.6052 to +27.2773 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 268.1511 to 285.6799 deg, Dec 16.6052 to 27.2773 deg
Loaded 17363 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10592 out of 14360 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 14360 out of 192027 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 78 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
2.1 pix Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
2.2 pix fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
2.1 pix fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
15.3 mag. Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
13.1 mag. fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.1 (SNR ) 12.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.KBN9XaXhmd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=55, blended=25798, bad_region=2, passed=194146
Got 194146 stars (including 168073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 194146 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 194146 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4935 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits N_match=4935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.556 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.699 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.623 n_q1=1289 n_q2=1114 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1316 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.257
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits -region wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.p2pPIKwSP8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits' -> 'wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=41, blended=25245, bad_region=2, passed=191986
Got 191986 stars (including 166509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 191986 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 191986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 533 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 191986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4933 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 191986 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4933 stars left (next iteration limit 5428)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits N_match=4933 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.522 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.601 n_q1=1305 n_q2=1102 n_q3=1217 n_q4=1309 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits -region wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qice2ONkbo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=1099, bad_region=25, passed=40495
Got 40495 stars (including 39308 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40495 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4917 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4917 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 40472 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4917 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=8.585 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.009 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.530 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.660 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4917 robust_rms=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.525 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4917 robust_rms_before=0.747 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.419 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.440 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.448 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.525
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.448 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits N_match=4917 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.444 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.454 n_q1=1832 n_q2=1119 n_q3=1010 n_q4=956 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.101
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LZroa7n3Vf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1120, bad_region=27, passed=41271
Got 41271 stars (including 40055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013088 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010470 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4926 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4929 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41247 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4929 stars left (next iteration limit 5421)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=8.106 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=14.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.642 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4929 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.501 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4929 robust_rms_before=0.713 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.416 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.465 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.501
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.465 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits N_match=4929 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.443 n_q1=1835 n_q2=1057 n_q3=1021 n_q4=1016 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits -region wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-42-00_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0084.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Her-08-Q1b1x1_034400_TTUQ1b1x1_3134825_jvEiOl3b/wcs_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Her-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:58:29.19 +26:02:25.1: 12.33 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:49:26.74 +23:14:49.6: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 17:54:48.49 +26:14:49.9: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:32.4: 12.25 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:27:08.20 +21:36:40.8: 11.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 17:57:01.52 +26:27:23.8: 12.23 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:47:12.41 +24:28:06.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 19:00:12.33 +26:00:14.1: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:32:13.67 +25:09:05.5: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:22:00.41 +26:20:46.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 19:00:12.33 +26:00:14.1: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:49:26.74 +23:14:49.6: 12.14 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 17:54:48.49 +26:14:49.9: 12.77 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:32.4: 12.26 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 17:57:01.52 +26:27:23.8: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:58:29.19 +26:02:25.1: 12.36 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:22:00.41 +26:20:46.2: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:47:12.41 +24:28:06.1: 12.77 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:32:13.67 +25:09:05.5: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:27:08.20 +21:36:40.8: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.26 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 19:00:12.33 +26:00:14.1: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4355 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.10 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.75 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:49:26.74 +23:14:49.6: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9673 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:54:48.49 +26:14:49.9: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2554 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:57:01.52 +26:27:23.8: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0444 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:54:48.32 +24:06:32.4: ref_mag=12.26 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9848 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:58:29.19 +26:02:25.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1198 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:00.41 +26:20:46.2: ref_mag=12.10 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3021 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:12.41 +24:28:06.1: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6679 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:27:08.20 +21:36:40.8: ref_mag=11.75 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8058 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:32:13.67 +25:09:05.5: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6500 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:57:05.20 +24:07:25.9: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:04:28.15 +26:38:27.7: 12.37 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:03:46.14 +26:37:27.7: 11.74 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:42:15.54 +16:44:48.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:46:40.16 +16:42:26.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:22:02.91 +23:18:50.6: 12.28 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:25:06.01 +26:54:22.3: 11.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:52:31.80 +25:05:07.0: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:12:41.95 +22:43:45.6: 12.03 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:57:05.20 +24:07:25.9: 11.32 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.32 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:03:46.14 +26:37:27.7: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:22:02.91 +23:18:50.6: 12.30 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:57:05.20 +24:07:25.9: ref_mag=11.32 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.1733 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:04:28.15 +26:38:27.7: 12.39 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:12:41.95 +22:43:45.6: 11.99 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.29 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.38 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:03:46.14 +26:37:27.7: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9220 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:22:02.91 +23:18:50.6: ref_mag=12.29 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0450 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:04:28.15 +26:38:27.7: ref_mag=12.38 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3446 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.01 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:12:41.95 +22:43:45.6: ref_mag=12.01 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8230 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:52:31.80 +25:05:07.0: 12.62 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:42:15.54 +16:44:48.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:25:06.01 +26:54:22.3: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:42:15.54 +16:44:48.0: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:46:40.16 +16:42:26.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:40.16 +16:42:26.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.60 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:52:31.80 +25:05:07.0: ref_mag=12.60 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2551 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.54 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:25:06.01 +26:54:22.3: ref_mag=11.54 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.7785 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:59:26.59 +24:47:08.6: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:47:03.93 +23:18:25.6: 12.58 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:01:56.90 +22:13:10.1: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:46:47.76 +23:35:52.9: 12.78 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:31:28.16 +23:00:24.8: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:47:20.95 +26:17:32.0: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:56:36.71 +21:21:57.9: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:40:00.28 +24:42:11.3: 13.18 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:26:38.35 +24:23:18.3: 13.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:59:26.59 +24:47:08.6: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:59:26.59 +24:47:08.6: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3256 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:01:56.90 +22:13:10.1: 12.80 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:46:47.76 +23:35:52.9: 12.74 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:31:28.16 +23:00:24.8: 12.62 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:01:56.90 +22:13:10.1: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1476 delta=0.67 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:47:03.93 +23:18:25.6: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:46:47.76 +23:35:52.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.5237 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.63 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:47:20.95 +26:17:32.0: 13.10 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:31:28.16 +23:00:24.8: ref_mag=12.63 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4471 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:03.93 +23:18:25.6: ref_mag=12.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2585 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:47:20.95 +26:17:32.0: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7451 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:56:36.71 +21:21:57.9: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.96 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:56:36.71 +21:21:57.9: ref_mag=12.96 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4799 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:26:38.35 +24:23:18.3: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:40:00.28 +24:42:11.3: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:26:38.35 +24:23:18.3: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8220 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:40:00.28 +24:42:11.3: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8753 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:06:16.15 +20:55:24.6: 12.69 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5: 13.69 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:06:16.15 +20:55:24.6: 12.68 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.69 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 18:06:16.15 +20:55:24.6: ref_mag=12.69 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0402 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:09:14.60 +20:01:25.7: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0970 delta=0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8: 13.30 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5: 13.73 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:08:28.97 +20:50:15.8: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.3027 delta=0.97 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:04:52.44 +21:29:06.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.4897 delta=1.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7: 13.24 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:13:29.52 +20:06:02.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.4180 delta=0.90 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 17:55:01.89 +26:19:16.6: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 17:56:58.98 +25:50:09.3: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:56:45.73 +23:33:00.7: ref_mag=13.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1749 delta=1.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 17:55:01.89 +26:19:16.6: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.01 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:01.89 +26:19:16.6: ref_mag=13.01 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1516 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0: 13.29 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 17:56:58.98 +25:50:09.3: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:49:19.37 +23:24:49.0: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.2031 delta=1.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:56:58.98 +25:50:09.3: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.2126 delta=0.65 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2: 13.11 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:11:06.81 +18:59:01.5: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1000 delta=1.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:10:41.61 +19:23:46.2: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1870 delta=0.94 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7: 12.97 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:09:54.46 +19:28:30.7: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.9992 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3: 13.01 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 18:32:49.03 +20:20:43.3: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7428 delta=1.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-07-55_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0224.fits at 17:55:17.17 +25:48:13.0: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-06-12_04-08-42_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0225.fits at 17:55:17.17 +25:48:13.0: 12.44 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 17:55:17.17 +25:48:13.0: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8913 delta=0.57 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out100816.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out114465.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out125453.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out129718.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out130894.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out142088.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out143618.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out192391.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out59581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out63722.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 737s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221138_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221138_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221140_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221140_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221143_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221143_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221144_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221144_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221148_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221148_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221150_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221150_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221152_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221152_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221153_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221153_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221154_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221154_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221155_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221155_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221156_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221156_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221157_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221157_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221236_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221236_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221296_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221296_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221311_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221311_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221532_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221532_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:22:08.49 +23:19:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221584_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221584_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221701_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221701_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221724_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221724_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221726_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221726_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221742_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221742_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:38.96 +26:13:23.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221749_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221749_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:54:38.00 +22:40:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221787_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221787_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:57.58 +22:28:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221804_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221804_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221836_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221836_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221883_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221883_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221903_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221903_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:07.88 +16:55:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 221996_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 221996_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:49:15.75 +25:01:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222014_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222014_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222020_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222020_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:17:57.61 +17:56:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222032_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222032_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222077_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222077_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222128_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222128_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222139_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222139_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:29.97 +24:13:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222240_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222240_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222269_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222269_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 222283_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 222283_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:32:51.71 +23:35:35.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89478_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 89478_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:06:02.08 +22:13:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117542_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 117542_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:45.80 +20:48:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 130894_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 130894_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114465_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 114465_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 207639_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 207639_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100816_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 100816_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182523_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 182523_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06313_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 06313_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 17:55:09.41 +26:36:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 147225_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 147225_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (41.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95312_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 95312_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:17.10 +21:40:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 115351_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 115351_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:35:54.59 +20:51:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64469_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 64469_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:04:42.73 +23:22:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111977_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 111977_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:07:39.76 +20:57:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129718_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 129718_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30407_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 30407_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:58.60 +25:07:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59581_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 59581_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99938_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 99938_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:29.77 +21:25:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10752_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 10752_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63722_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 63722_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 18894_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 18894_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192391_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 192391_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 143618_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 143618_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160601_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 160601_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:28:25.59 +17:19:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50528_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 50528_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:56:59.43 +24:01:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105427_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 105427_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:31:56.81 +21:21:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142088_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 142088_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61810_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 61810_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:57:36.68 +23:26:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125453_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
Preparing report for the candidate 125453_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19025_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 19025_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113336_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 113336_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29634_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 29634_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:55.58 +25:10:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102635_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 102635_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:52:44.75 +21:24:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40000_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 40000_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:59:15.84 +24:34:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16731_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 16731_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:41:20.84 +26:09:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 125751_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 125751_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:20:29.52 +20:19:27.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145903_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 145903_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:09:40.24 +19:08:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 122515_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 122515_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:05:54.01 +20:27:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06772_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 06772_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:50:12.66 +26:41:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132437_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 132437_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:08:53.06 +20:02:43.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100383_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 100383_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 18:01:30.40 +21:35:46.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178005_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085
The candidate 178005_fd_Her-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-43-20_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0085 did not pass the final checks
