######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.nao.ac.jp
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.nao.ac.jp)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Aur-03-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Aur-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Aur-03-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 708839 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 708839 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits_preview.png'
Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits

renamed 'Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.png' -> 'transient_report/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits_preview.png'
Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 589.4561
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 820.9163
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1660.9142
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 396.1897
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1659.4115
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 397.0410
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.81771
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.002
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T03:13:04.0416679' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T08:13:04.0416679' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.3424078817 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T08:13:13.9458120' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.3425225117 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 81.8145225918967 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002147488625 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 19.8544444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 56.8830555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.92222196432203 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 27 16' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/d_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits :)
Spent 0.510237 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/d_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-22T03:14:07.4381873' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-22T08:14:07.4381873' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61274.3431416433 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-22T08:14:17.3405698' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61274.34325625 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 81.8145224556397 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 38.0002147485534 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 20.04 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 56.9872222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 2.89671096914957 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Aur-03' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '05 27 16' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+38 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 29504 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.8 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 41.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 903.49 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 25.0 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 5.400432 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 4.00032 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/d_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits :)
Spent 0.515312 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/d_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits

fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461274.84252362
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:16.998 +37:59:58.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:33.815 +37:56:38.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:16.998 +37:59:58.58
Second-epoch image center 05:27:33.815 +37:56:38.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:35.148 +37:57:11.58 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:16.998 +37:59:58.58
Second-epoch image center 05:27:35.148 +37:57:11.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0755 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:27:33.815 +37:56:38.41
Second-epoch second image center 05:27:35.148 +37:57:11.58
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01020 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EJUGinvltk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5EiHsudqvK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.J7f9HicJpn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xYHxK3LvVY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits and wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8756 to 92.1259 deg, Dec +31.9880 to +43.3913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8756 to 92.1259 deg, Dec 31.9880 to 43.3913 deg
Loaded 16034 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11109 out of 12457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12457 out of 27843 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.927300
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.927300
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.70
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 70.8756 to 92.1259 deg, Dec +31.9880 to +43.3913 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 70.8756 to 92.1259 deg, Dec 31.9880 to 43.3913 deg
Loaded 16034 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11109 out of 12457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12457 out of 27843 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 27116 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.3491 to 92.6948 deg, Dec +32.1392 to +43.3190 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.3491 to 92.6948 deg, Dec 32.1392 to 43.3190 deg
Loaded 16026 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11083 out of 12589 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12589 out of 27116 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
2.1 pix Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
2.8 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
2.7 pix fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
15.2 mag. Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
12.7 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
12.6 mag. fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.6 (SNR ) 10.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.EJUGinvltk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2982, bad_region=0, passed=27843
Got 27843 stars (including 24835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27843 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4823 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 609 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4884 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4821 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits N_match=4821 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.289 n_q1=919 n_q2=1327 n_q3=1362 n_q4=1213 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.287
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5EiHsudqvK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3147, bad_region=0, passed=27116
Got 27116 stars (including 23937 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27116 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4823 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4889 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 27116 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5305)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.624 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.442 n_q1=1116 n_q2=1448 n_q3=1299 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits -region wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.J7f9HicJpn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=92, bad_region=0, passed=3829
Got 3829 stars (including 3733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3596 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3824 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3657 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3595 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3595 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 3595 stars left (next iteration limit 3955)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3595 robust_rms=5.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.374 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3595 robust_rms=0.473 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.609 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3595 robust_rms=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.562 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3595 robust_rms_before=0.874 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.453 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.401 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.607 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.562
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.607 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits N_match=3595 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.435 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.479 n_q1=749 n_q2=447 n_q3=1753 n_q4=646 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.384
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xYHxK3LvVY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=104, bad_region=0, passed=3826
Got 3826 stars (including 3718 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3826 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 943.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 943.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013097 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010478 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3641 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3584 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3582 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3584 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3640 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3583 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Excluding outliers - 3583 stars left (next iteration limit 3942)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3583 robust_rms=5.597 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.311 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3583 robust_rms=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.548 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3583 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3583 robust_rms_before=0.819 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.431 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.439 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.574 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.548
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.574 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits N_match=3583 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.413 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.456 n_q1=757 n_q2=478 n_q3=1699 n_q4=649 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.239
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits sigma_overall=0.359 worst_q_ratio=1.287
ref2=Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits sigma_overall=0.496 worst_q_ratio=1.258
new1=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits sigma_overall=0.435 worst_q_ratio=1.384
new2=fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits sigma_overall=0.413 worst_q_ratio=1.239
reference average sigma_overall=0.4275 worst_q_ratio=1.2725
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049_astrometric_residuals.png (4821 matched stars from wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054_astrometric_residuals.png (4822 matched stars from wcs_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062_astrometric_residuals.png (3595 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063_astrometric_residuals.png (3583 matched stars from wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.41 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33143_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 33143_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 9.87 | 05:07:56.93 +37:48:57.3 | 2459 3042 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:07:56.91 +37:48:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02306_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 02306_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.25 | 04:56:59.88 +33:09:59.3 | 1064 0228 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 04:56:59.88 +33:09:59.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14476_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14476_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 9.81 | 05:41:55.88 +38:56:01.0 | 6430 3912 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:41:55.88 +38:56:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03860_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 03860_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 8.82 | 05:27:07.49 +34:08:58.6 | 4858 0903 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:27:07.50 +34:08:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11121_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 11121_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.62 | 05:24:39.21 +37:23:05.9 | 4458 2835 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:24:39.20 +37:23:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04473_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 04473_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.27 | 05:27:38.91 +34:28:32.7 | 4912 1103 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:27:38.91 +34:28:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14902_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14902_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.20 | 05:49:10.22 +39:10:49.5 | 7259 4151 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:49:10.21 +39:10:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01895_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 01895_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.19 | 05:18:10.72 +33:22:15.0 | 3757 0380 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:18:10.69 +33:22:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10519_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10519_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.15 | 05:51:02.40 +37:18:18.5 | 7610 3052 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:51:02.41 +37:18:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14800_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 14800_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 6.08 | 05:51:29.18 +39:08:53.3 | 7531 4164 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:51:29.22 +39:08:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10151_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063
The candidate 10151_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 22.34326 | 2461274.84326 | 5.69 | 05:59:43.18 +37:12:42.2 | 8660 3133 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits |
**** FOUND 05:59:43.19 +37:12:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Last image: 2461274.84252362 22.08.2026 08:13:04.041 UTC
WARNING: VaST exited with code 1 on the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 as too few input images were matched to the reference image - wrong pointing? clouds? very bad focus?
Blind plate solve of the unmatched second-epoch image fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits to check the telescope pointing
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Field of view for the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits was not set. Trying to guess...
The guess is 605 arcmin.
No image with WCS calibration found for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits .... Determining astrometry method...
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net software...
Choosing aperture...
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/lib/make_outxyls_for_astrometric_calibration found 4009 high-SNR stars for plate solving
This service uses tools provided by Astrometry.net.
For more information visit http://astrometry.net/
######### Trying to solve plate assuming 605' field of view #########
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Using the local copy of Astrometry.net code
IMAGE_SIZE= --width 9576 --height 6388 SCALE_LOW=544.5 SCALE_HIGH=3025.0
Using solve-field binary
/usr/local/astrometry/bin/solve-field
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1073592.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1073592.axy"...
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4119.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4118.fits, field objects 1-10).
Field 1 did not solve (index index-4117.fits, field objects 1-10).
log-odds ratio 70.2809 (3.33112e+30), 10 match, 0 conflict, 27 distractors, 27 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8825,37.9424), pixel scale 5.98553 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-----++-+-----+-+---+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1073592.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1073592.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (81.892084, 37.945148) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:27:34.100, +37:56:42.534).
Field size: 15.8083 x 10.5768 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.19669 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Inserting WCS header... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits' -> 'fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 22 03:22 fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 22 03:22 out1073592.wcs
Inserting WCS header (1st iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
done
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits (fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits)
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration01' / astrometry.net run
Reading input file 1 of 1: "out1073592.xyls"...
Reading sort column "FLUX_APER"
Sorting sort column
mmapping input file
Copying table header.
Writing row 0
Done
Solving...
Reading file "./out1073592.axy"...
Only searching for solutions within 15.7517 degrees of RA,Dec (81.8932,37.9459)
log-odds ratio 70.2809 (3.33112e+30), 10 match, 0 conflict, 27 distractors, 27 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8825,37.9424), pixel scale 5.98553 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-----++-+-----+-+---+-----+-----+(best)---------------------------------------------------------------
Field 1: solved with index index-4116.fits.
Field 1 solved: writing to file ./out1073592.solved to indicate this.
Field: out1073592.xyls
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (81.889455, 37.944292) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:27:33.469, +37:56:39.450).
Field size: 15.7937 x 10.5728 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.20432 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
WCS keywords and Astrometry.net provenance markers have been successfully stripped from all HDUs in the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 117M Aug 22 03:22 fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 12K Aug 22 03:22 out1073592.wcs
Inserting WCS header (2nd iteration local)... Opening FITS image file fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits for reading... done!
Creating new image file (wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits)... done!
done!
All done!
The WCS header appears to be added with no errors.
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST001 = 'wcs_image_calibration.sh' / VaST script name
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST002 = 'local ' / ASTROMETRYNET_LOCAL_OR_REMOTE
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST003 = 'local ' / PLATE_SOLVE_SERVER
Keyword does not exist
Keyword has been changed to:
VAST004 = 'iteration02' / astrometry.net run
The field of view is large: we'll try to run Astromety.net code on the image itself rather than a star list
Reading input file "wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits"...
Found an existing WCS header, will try to verify it.
Extracting sources...
simplexy: found 23111 sources.
Solving...
Reading file "./wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.axy"...
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7745, 956.018] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 148.244 (2.40794e+64), 15 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 15 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+-+-----++------------+-----+------------+--+-------+-------+--------------+-------++-------+(best)--
--> log-odds 148.244
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 297.328 (1.34204e+129), 27 match, 0 conflict, 96 distractors, 27 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+-+----++++---+-+-++--+--+--+------------+--+-+-----+-------++-------+-----+-------++-------+--
--> log-odds 297.328
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 519.718 (5.13775e+225), 47 match, 0 conflict, 87 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++-++---++++-+-++++++-++--+--+-++------+--+--+-+--+--+----+--++-+--++++-----+------+++-------+--
--> log-odds 519.718
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1004.65 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 326 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++--++++-++++-+++++++-+--+-++-++-+--++-+--++++++--++++-++-+++--+----++-
--> log-odds 1004.65
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1828.5 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 748 distractors, 185 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--++++-+++++++++++++++++-+++++-++++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++-++-+++++
--> log-odds 1828.5
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3415.67 (inf), 369 match, 0 conflict, 1212 distractors, 372 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3415.67
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6144.38 (inf), 718 match, 0 conflict, 3535 distractors, 725 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6144.38
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11486.4 (inf), 1452 match, 0 conflict, 4760 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11486.4
Verifying WCS using indices with quads of size [63.7745, 956.018] arcmin
Verifying WCS with index 87 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4117.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 148.244 (2.40794e+64), 15 match, 0 conflict, 83 distractors, 15 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+---+-+-----++------------+-----+------------+--+-------+-------+--------------+-------++-------+(best)--
--> log-odds 148.244
Verifying WCS with index 88 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4116.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 297.328 (1.34204e+129), 27 match, 0 conflict, 96 distractors, 27 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: -+-+-+-+----++++---+-+-++--+--+--+------------+--+-+-----+-------++-------+-----+-------++-------+--
--> log-odds 297.328
Verifying WCS with index 89 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4115.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 519.718 (5.13775e+225), 47 match, 0 conflict, 87 distractors, 47 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++-+++-++---++++-+-++++++-++--+--+-++------+--+--+-+--+--+----+--++-+--++++-----+------+++-------+--
--> log-odds 519.718
Verifying WCS with index 90 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4114.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1004.65 (inf), 96 match, 0 conflict, 326 distractors, 97 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: ++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++--++++-++++-+++++++-+--+-++-++-+--++-+--++++++--++++-++-+++--+----++-
--> log-odds 1004.65
Verifying WCS with index 91 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4113.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 1828.5 (inf), 184 match, 0 conflict, 748 distractors, 185 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--++++-+++++++++++++++++-+++++-++++++++++++++++-++++-+++++++-++-+++++
--> log-odds 1828.5
Verifying WCS with index 92 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4112.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 3415.67 (inf), 369 match, 0 conflict, 1212 distractors, 372 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++-+++++
--> log-odds 3415.67
Verifying WCS with index 93 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4111.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 6144.38 (inf), 718 match, 0 conflict, 3535 distractors, 725 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 6144.38
Verifying WCS with index 94 of 109 (/usr/local/astrometry/data/index-4110.fits)
Verifying WCS of field 1.
log-odds ratio 11486.4 (inf), 1452 match, 0 conflict, 4760 distractors, 1464 index.
RA,Dec = (81.8883,37.9435), pixel scale 5.99009 arcsec/pix.
Hit/miss: Hit/miss: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++++-++++++++++++++++++++++-+++++++++++++++++++++
--> log-odds 11486.4
Got 16 solutions.
Field: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Field center: (RA,Dec) = (81.889784, 37.943220) deg.
Field center: (RA H:M:S, Dec D:M:S) = (05:27:33.548, +37:56:35.593).
Field size: 15.795 x 10.5744 degrees
Field rotation angle: up is 3.2044 degrees E of N
Field parity: neg
Creating new FITS file "./wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.new"...
renamed 'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.new' -> 'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits'
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits was not found.
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Generating wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat from image00003.cat
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits created.
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Image size: 943.0'x626.7' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:27:33.815 +37:56:38.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 31437 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky1086786.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the blindly solved unmatched second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:27:16.998 +37:59:58.58
Second-epoch image center 05:27:33.815 +37:56:38.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0784 deg.
###################################
The second-epoch image center is consistent with the reference image center (offset 0.0784 deg.) - the star matching failure is probably not a pointing problem
____ VaST output ____
--==VaST 1.0rc90==--
Parsing command line arguments...
opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor
opt '5': 5.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius!
opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching!
opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source!
opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted!
opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope)
opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag!
WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars.
opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done!
opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually!
opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored!
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images
INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images
Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ...
Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found.
This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file.
Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h)... OK
Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor
Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files.
Done with cleaning!
VaST was started with the following command line:
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Preparing to process 4 input FITS images...
######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ########
transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search!
transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search!
transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit
transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!!
transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3
transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars
transient search mode: not discarding large sources
################
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
Setting the fixed star match radius of 5.00 pix
We have 4 images to process.
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits catalog from cache
SExtractor catalog cache: restored Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits catalog from cache
Running SExtractor in 3 parallel threads...
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Using the catalog image00002.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Parent process says: we are done fork()ing.
Waiting for thread 2 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
The above guess is baExcluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
sed on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size
sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.2,5.2,4.7,5.8,6.3,6.8 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run
sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.2,5.2,4.7,5.7,6.2,6.8 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Waiting for thread 1 to finish...
autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Done with SExtractor!
TIMING SExtractor: 11 seconds
Matching stars between images!
No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine.
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T02:41:07.3186602
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-01-18T02:41:07.3186602
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-01-18T02:41:07.318
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
Exposure 20 sec, 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461058.61200600 mid. exp.
The reference image star 8500.386 870.656 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 9441.752 4280.150 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 2317.999 4331.999 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1543.303 5510.395 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The reference image star 1505.036 5323.224 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 201264, (201263 good for image matching)
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 55
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 5
* rejected close to frame edge: 979
* rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>4.7 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 12
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied.
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.38
Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.4 (5.0 sigma detection)
The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6
80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.9
Selected detection limit= -7.9
Final detection limit= -7.9 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0)
Parameter box for transient search: 10.04.5 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 9
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
211154 * detected, using 524/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.025124, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5305
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=2 pairs=177834 inliers=177834 rms 1.32 -> 0.38 pix, max corner correction 5.1 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.023296, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4919
178250 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=1 pairs=178250 inliers=178250 rms 0.31 -> 0.31 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.023267, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4913
178250 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=178250 inliers=178250 rms 0.32 -> 0.32 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.023267, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4913
178250 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = 174.730
211154 stars detected, 178250 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 145257, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 145257 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 145245 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = -0.00001*X_pix -0.00001*Y_pix +0.10588
Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)...
Computing robust linear magnitude calibration.
Used 133070 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.37
234168 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
Magnitude calibration is performed successfully!
Saving observations to the cache... OK
memory: 370484 kB used, 398864 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
Total number of measurements 412418 (412418 measurements stored in RAM)
sorting the measurements cached in memory,
writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-22T08:13:04.0416679
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-22T08:13:04.0416679
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-22T08:13:04.041
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
The star 8497.986 871.978 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1152.004 919.011 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 190.990 1040.074 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 4000.439 1318.994 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 883.982 1377.018 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3618.997 1437.025 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 352.014 1876.008 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8838.998 2029.991 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 2635.934 2108.010 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1895.871 2206.039 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 31233
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 21
* rejected close to frame edge: 139
* rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 43
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
31233 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000329, number_of_ambiguous_matches=77
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=30790 inliers=30790 rms 2.06 -> 0.54 pix, max corner correction 6.4 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=18
30883 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=2 pairs=30883 inliers=30883 rms 0.27 -> 0.26 pix, max corner correction 0.2 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=18
30883 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=30883 inliers=30883 rms 0.26 -> 0.26 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=18
30883 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -6.428
31233 stars detected, 30883 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 20176, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 20176 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 18811 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00015*X_pix -0.00009*Y_pix -0.11968
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 18811 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.77
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
234168 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 487028 kB used, 649020 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%)
Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)'
Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)'
The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown)
Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-22T08:14:07.4381873
Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-08-22T08:14:07.4381873
Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format:
DATE-OBS= 2026-08-22T08:14:07.438
EXPTIME = 20.000
Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
The star 8498.008 872.005 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1152.034 918.990 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 191.005 1039.984 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 884.026 1377.013 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 3618.993 1437.006 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 352.016 1875.980 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 8838.844 2029.979 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 1893.849 2200.413 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 4923.044 2428.022 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
The star 725.033 2732.036 is rejected, see bad_region.lst
Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all)
SExtractor output filtering results:
* passed selection: 31905
* rejected as having no flux measurement: 0
* rejected as having SNR<3.0: 1
* rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 22
* rejected close to frame edge: 151
* rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0
* rejected as being too large (>5.2 pix): 0
* rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0
* rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0
* rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 41
* rejected due to an external image flag: 0
* rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0
---
You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'.
31905 * detected, using 100/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000363, number_of_ambiguous_matches=85
refining the coordinate transformation... [CVPOLY iter 1: order=3 pairs=31449 inliers=31449 rms 2.02 -> 0.52 pix, max corner correction 5.6 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000077, number_of_ambiguous_matches=18
31533 * matched, [CVPOLY iter 2: order=3 pairs=31533 inliers=31533 rms 0.26 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.5 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000081, number_of_ambiguous_matches=19
31532 * matched (2nd iteration). [CVPOLY iter 3: order=1 pairs=31532 inliers=31532 rms 0.25 -> 0.25 pix, max corner correction 0.0 pix] fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000081, number_of_ambiguous_matches=19
31532 * matched (3rd iteration). Success!
rotation [degrees] = -6.427
31905 stars detected, 31532 stars matched
Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars
Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration
We have N_good_stars = 20620, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0
Using 20620 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering).
Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)...
After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 19218 stars for magnitude calibration.
Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction:
delta_m = 0.00014*X_pix -0.00009*Y_pix -0.12850
ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG
Used 19218 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering).
get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.77
[01;31m ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image. [33;00m
234168 objects stored in memory (1000000 max.)
memory: 487292 kB used, 649020 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM
processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%)
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 10 seconds
Done with measurements! =)
Total number of measurements 412418 (0 measurements stored in RAM)
Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory...
Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files...
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory...
Creating vast_image_details.log ...
Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK
Selecting the best aperture for each source
Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 40838 stars
Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars
Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 46261 stars
Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 25023 stars
Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 24929 stars
Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 41199 stars
done! =)
TIMING select_aperture: 10 seconds
Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve
You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make'
Computing, please wait a bit
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 177441 objects, the longest string is 386 bytes.
Allocating memory for resorting the file.
----***** VaST processing WARNING *****----
You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one.
Please investigate this!
**************************************************************
This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by
inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic
messages printed above (or the vast*.log files):
* How many of the input images are matched?
* Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable?
* Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 20 percent?
You may run
./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit
to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings
(star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration
file, see various examples in the VaST directory).
If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky
Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log
file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please
upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/
**************************************************************
Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1)
_____________________
ERROR running VaST on the field Aur-03-Q1b1x1 (less than 4 images processed)
exp_start= 18.01.2026 02:41:07.318 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461058.61200600 ap= 4.7 rotation= 0.000 *detected= 201264 *matched= 201264 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-41-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0049.fits
exp_start= 22.02.2026 02:50:53.978 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461093.61879604 ap= 4.5 rotation= 174.730 *detected= 211154 *matched= 178250 status=OK /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-50-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0054.fits
exp_start= 22.08.2026 08:13:04.041 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461274.84252362 ap= 5.2 rotation= -6.428 *detected= 31233 *matched= 30883 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
exp_start= 22.08.2026 08:14:07.438 exp= 20.000 JD= 2461274.84325738 ap= 5.2 rotation= -6.427 *detected= 31905 *matched= 31532 status=ERROR /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits
Source monitoring: measuring positions from /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-08-22_CI_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_031445_TTUQ1b1x1_165931_rOaoLx9h/monitoring_positions.txt
Read 31437 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 71.5200 to 92.8863 deg, Dec +32.0140 to +43.3264 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 71.5200 to 92.8863 deg, Dec 32.0140 to 43.3264 deg
Loaded 16297 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10343 out of 10747 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10747 out of 31437 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits via Tycho-2
util/pixel_flux_airmass_correction processing wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits
Observation time (mid-exposure, UTC): JD 2461274.84252 (FITS header)
Observing site: lat= +33.748056 deg lon= -101.958333 deg east-positive (SITELAT/SITELONG FITS header keywords)
Frame center (pixel 4788.5 3194.5): RA= 81.88978 deg Dec= +37.94322 deg
Frame center: alt= +20.054 deg az= 61.714 deg airmass= 2.8878
Header cross-check: CENTALT= 19.854 deg (difference +0.199 deg)
Header cross-check: AIRMASS= 2.9222 (we compute 2.8878)
Airmass zero-point fit: REJECT_K_RANGE k= +1.0724 +/- 0.0084 mag/airmass N= 5130 airmass span 2.0379-5.0154 scatter 0.2993 mag
Source monitoring: airmass zero-point for wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-13-04_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0062.fits: REJECT_K_RANGE +3.071451 -1.072354 2.8878 +1.0724 5130 2.9775 0.2993 2.0379 5.0154
Source monitoring: plate-solved image wcs_fd_Aur-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-22_03-14-07_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0063.fits not found - skipping this image
########### Completed Aur-03-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.84252362 -observatory V36
09:45:06.49 +15:19:25.9 Mercury (-1.7mag)
12:50:09.85 -07:46:14.5 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:29:49.84 +23:39:00.1 Mars (1.3mag)
08:55:29.28 +17:53:06.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:54:49.37 +03:01:33.4 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:13:02.20 +21:00:19.1 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:08.07 +00:06:16.9 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:26:50.70 -23:35:11.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
17:26:18.39 -28:32:06.3 Moon (-11.0mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 22 03:20 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.84252362:
08:55:33.22 +17:52:48.7 Io (6.1mag)
08:55:36.49 +17:52:34.3 Europa (6.3mag)
08:55:45.34 +17:51:53.8 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:55:09.80 +17:54:38.3 Callisto (6.9mag)
08:52:57.50 +18:01:06.7 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:55:28.59 +17:53:10.9 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:52:36.74 +17:56:59.1 Elara (17.7mag)
08:59:36.88 +17:26:22.4 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:57:42.45 +18:06:41.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:54:45.82 +03:01:58.7 Titan (8.4mag)
00:54:54.01 +03:01:24.0 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:24.81 +03:03:14.1 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:54:57.28 +03:01:50.0 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:53:54.16 +02:52:58.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 22 03:21 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461274.84252362:
20:11:52.15 -14:04:39.7 JWST
17:32:44.34 +35:44:35.1 Chandra
10:54:52.51 -59:11:36.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 22 03:20 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461274.84252362 -observatory V36
03:28:14.55 +18:26:25.1 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:54.59 -34:28:36.0 14.2mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:06:29.59 -69:29:22.6 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:13:08.45 +33:18:25.9 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:21:05.00 +42:24:15.5 17.5mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:26:44.61 +30:22:44.9 17.4mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:56:53.95 +26:17:01.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:34:41.66 +27:51:09.5 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:38:17.62 +05:17:59.6 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:15:39.65 -12:52:39.4 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:53:26.95 +64:04:24.3 18.0mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:36:29.42 -14:13:54.5 14.6mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:23:14.70 +32:00:42.6 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:42.23 +15:30:16.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:46:52.27 +43:29:22.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:49:25.91 +49:41:18.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:25:45.13 -12:53:57.4 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:04:36.21 +21:36:36.2 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:53:14.80 +19:57:32.1 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:07:23.09 +01:21:19.3 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:10:28.49 +76:17:29.9 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:55.62 +46:20:58.9 17.3mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:58:50.44 +09:55:35.9 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:12:23.68 -32:17:55.0 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:37:42.71 -04:19:10.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:36:22.87 +00:01:44.1 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:51:37.84 -06:06:06.6 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:06:44.97 +20:14:37.2 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:25:50.59 -24:59:53.8 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:11:59.26 +14:32:11.4 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:30:28.20 +25:35:19.5 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:47:31.38 +22:24:24.9 17.2mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:42:30.91 +28:18:01.9 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:51:36.90 +24:05:49.7 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:12:29.22 -15:35:58.6 17.3mag 124P/Mrkos
05:56:43.86 +21:01:46.4 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:51:55.56 +18:06:06.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
23:59:37.90 +03:06:03.8 17.4mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:09:38.71 -18:37:37.3 12.8mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
08:03:33.85 +38:07:18.7 16.1mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:04:21.46 +29:57:15.2 12.2mag 169P/NEAT
03:06:09.49 +09:23:41.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
20:16:20.82 -51:48:43.6 18.0mag 259P/Garradd
04:03:13.51 +30:49:23.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:47:15.53 +37:05:21.2 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:16:10.76 +01:33:23.7 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:13:42.07 +17:40:07.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 22 03:20 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 22 03:20 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag
18:03:09.04 +12:18:14.0 TCP J18030904+1218140 2026-08-19.5199 14.9mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 22 03:20 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
08:44:08.771 +29:07:45.05 AT 2026xfr 2026-01-14.38 20.4
23:28:59.311 -21:41:17.71 AT 2026xfq 2026-07-19.57 21.15
20:34:55.430 -31:12:10.98 AT 2026xfp 2026-07-14.44 20
13:01:30.092 +38:12:35.50 AT 2026xfo 2026-06-23.28 20.85
23:22:05.758 +18:57:29.94 AT 2026xfn 2026-07-25.52 21.28
10:13:35.246 -20:37:42.73 AT 2026xfm 2026-01-27.58 21
21:57:25.287 +03:48:20.98 AT 2026xfl 2026-07-16.55 21.68
14:26:07.382 +33:39:52.18 AT 2026xfk 2026-06-13.34 20.9
02:09:31.559 -03:10:04.80 AT 2026xfj 2026-01-17.24 21.98
20:17:01.562 -20:06:27.94 AT 2026xfi 2026-05-20.56 20.93
21:08:09.912 -21:12:24.85 AT 2026xfh 2026-06-19.58 20.9
20:08:20.135 -25:53:36.34 AT 2026xfg 2026-07-19.45 20.74
14:51:25.078 +41:07:07.07 AT 2026xff 2026-06-13.34 21.62
22:33:15.210 +12:04:33.49 AT 2026xfe 2026-06-21.53 20.23
13:52:05.795 +29:21:47.19 AT 2026xfd 2026-04-24.32 20.92
13:30:27.613 +10:38:39.93 AT 2026xfc 2026-04-20.32 21.07
13:40:18.442 +39:30:10.71 AT 2026xfb 2026-05-24.29 20.6
20:02:32.611 -29:31:03.47 AT 2026xfa 2026-06-16.52 19.85
21:35:00.881 +03:50:25.49 AT 2026xez 2026-07-16.55 21.5
08:33:56.550 +06:59:43.01 AT 2026xey 2026-01-24.36 22.17
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 22 03:20 tns_transients_list.txt