This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,7.25,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 7.25CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4711 2461271.9711 9.06 06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1
188.22186 1.36967 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 0 -0 0 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,9.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 9.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,7.72,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 7.72CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4711 2461271.9711 13.08 06:20:28.67 +19:21:37.4
192.24669 2.18227 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana 0 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:28.67 +19:21:37.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:28.67 +19:21:37.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,13.08,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 13.08CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4711 2461271.9711 11.20 06:28:04.73 +22:49:03.6
190.00211 5.35713 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.73 +22:49:03.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:04.73 +22:49:03.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,11.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 11.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4711 2461271.9711 12.02 06:33:34.00 +24:30:42.6
189.05396 7.24417 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 6.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania 0 -1 1 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:34.00 +24:30:42.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:34.00 +24:30:42.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9711,12.02,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4711 12.02CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461271.97142650 19.08.2026 11:18:41.250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17949
Objects passed selection criteria: 17884
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15455.8
Average stars matched: 13297 (86.0327 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248308 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 06:37:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461271.97142650 19.08.2026 11:18:41.250 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 36 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 130759
Objects passed selection criteria: 130466
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 113684
Average stars matched: 102286 (89.9744 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 622932 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 06:39:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.97084943
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:05.253 +22:01:53.22 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:28:05.253 +22:01:53.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0999 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:03.397 +22:01:24.51 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:28:03.397 +22:01:24.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0913 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:28:05.253 +22:01:53.22
Second-epoch second image center 06:28:03.397 +22:01:24.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01072 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BT4jJXQmi0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8H6eW7woEB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oszE15v0cM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zpkeru2dFc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
13.7 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.7 (SNR ) 10.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.BT4jJXQmi0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=6704, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 19960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1455 n_q2=895 n_q3=1550 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8H6eW7woEB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=7092, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 22011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1428 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oszE15v0cM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=785, bad_region=1899, passed=9714
Got 9714 stars (including 7140 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9714 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8197 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4796 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=6.300 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.668 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.512 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.605 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4796 robust_rms=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.482 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4796 robust_rms_before=0.823 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.506 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.435 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.541 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.482
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:05.241 +22:01:52.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9714 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4070095.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.823 -> 0.435 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits N_match=4796 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.459 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.500 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.440 n_q1=1537 n_q2=856 n_q3=1536 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.105
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zpkeru2dFc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=813, bad_region=1806, passed=9081
Got 9081 stars (including 6592 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4793 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7639 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4793 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=6.217 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.697 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.560 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4793 robust_rms=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.460 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4793 robust_rms_before=0.780 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.502 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.424 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.537 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.460
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:03.383 +22:01:23.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 9081 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky4069998.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.780 -> 0.424 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits N_match=4793 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.457 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.473 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.448 n_q1=1545 n_q2=859 n_q3=1518 n_q4=871 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.062
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.117
ref2=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits sigma_overall=0.459 worst_q_ratio=1.105
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits sigma_overall=0.457 worst_q_ratio=1.062
reference average sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.118
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4827 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552_astrometric_residuals.png (4796 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553_astrometric_residuals.png (4793 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.36 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 38607_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38612_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 38612_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:09:12.15 +22:30:33.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Image size: 937.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:05.241 +22:01:52.47 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:28:05.241 +22:01:52.47
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0998 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:28:03.383 +22:01:23.90 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:28:03.383 +22:01:23.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0912 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:28:05.241 +22:01:52.47
Second-epoch second image center 06:28:03.383 +22:01:23.90
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01070 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VOf5O9VrgR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KkcIoIeonH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4kC82343VG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kaw5hoPCDI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.723200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.723200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 133 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VOf5O9VrgR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=31903, bad_region=37736, passed=206254
Got 206254 stars (including 141027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1462 n_q2=892 n_q3=1535 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KkcIoIeonH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=29566, bad_region=30361, passed=188602
Got 188602 stars (including 132646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1389 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4kC82343VG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=4925, bad_region=9420, passed=75047
Got 75047 stars (including 61274 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013026 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010421 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 68141 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=6.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.260 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.511 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.600 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=0.436 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.436 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.486 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.487
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.486 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.478 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.480 n_q1=1552 n_q2=836 n_q3=1521 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.021
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kaw5hoPCDI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4584, bad_region=9215, passed=73935
Got 73935 stars (including 60724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 73935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67180 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=6.270 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.491 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.535 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=0.420 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.421 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.451 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.450
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.451 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.487 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.468 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.524 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.496 n_q1=1558 n_q2=840 n_q3=1504 n_q4=901 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.077
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-17-51_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0552.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_063526_TTUQ2b1x1_4033210_RDxaJo4l/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:17.91 +25:01:12.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:54.59 +22:32:10.5: 13.55 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:01.49 +23:36:01.0: 13.63 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:12:19.61 +24:55:41.3: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:17.47 +22:34:22.8: 12.53 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:17.91 +25:01:12.4: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:54.59 +22:32:10.5: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:12:19.61 +24:55:41.3: 12.54 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:01.49 +23:36:01.0: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.66 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:17.91 +25:01:12.4: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4073 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:01.49 +23:36:01.0: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6528 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:12:19.61 +24:55:41.3: ref_mag=12.66 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0944 delta=-0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:54.59 +22:32:10.5: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4485 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:43.27 +23:42:34.6: 12.64 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.45 +23:46:05.6: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:17.47 +22:34:22.8: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.30 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:17.47 +22:34:22.8: ref_mag=12.30 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8817 delta=-0.58 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:22.0: 12.64 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:43.27 +23:42:34.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.45 +23:46:05.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.64 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:43.27 +23:42:34.6: ref_mag=12.64 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8604 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.45 +23:46:05.6: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8943 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:32.76 +21:37:59.9: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:05.48 +26:15:19.4: 12.24 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:22.0: 12.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.32 +24:18:22.0: ref_mag=12.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8247 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.1: 12.16 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:22.46 +25:34:51.3: 11.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:32.76 +21:37:59.9: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:32.76 +21:37:59.9: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5133 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:05.48 +26:15:19.4: 12.21 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.22 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:05.48 +26:15:19.4: ref_mag=12.22 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4219 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:22.46 +25:34:51.3: 11.71 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.1: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.74 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:22.46 +25:34:51.3: ref_mag=11.74 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9275 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.13 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.47 +23:55:56.1: ref_mag=12.13 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3597 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.9: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:30:41.34 +20:24:36.4: 11.87 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.2: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:15.66 +18:46:38.6: 11.89 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.9: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.62 +20:16:16.9: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.5925 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:49.15 +24:25:33.4: 12.02 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:30:41.34 +20:24:36.4: 11.86 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.86 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:30:41.34 +20:24:36.4: ref_mag=11.86 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0206 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:54.40 +21:19:13.2: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1997 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:15.66 +18:46:38.6: 11.72 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:15.66 +18:46:38.6: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1949 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:49.15 +24:25:33.4: 12.20 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.09 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:49.15 +24:25:33.4: ref_mag=12.09 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3043 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:56.77 +20:32:38.0: 12.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:21.66 +18:14:28.5: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:06.59 +25:22:51.8: 12.95 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:56.77 +20:32:38.0: 12.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.15 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:56.77 +20:32:38.0: ref_mag=12.15 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7568 delta=-0.60 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:10.97 +25:24:58.6: 12.78 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:47.82 +22:44:55.7: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:21.66 +18:14:28.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:21.66 +18:14:28.5: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7867 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:06.59 +25:22:51.8: 12.72 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.81 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:06.59 +25:22:51.8: ref_mag=12.81 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8073 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:10.97 +25:24:58.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.78 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:47.82 +22:44:55.7: 12.65 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.97 +25:24:58.6: ref_mag=12.78 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8433 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.70 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:47.82 +22:44:55.7: ref_mag=12.70 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8583 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:46.35 +22:44:45.6: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:10.77 +25:28:04.2: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:20:28.67 +19:21:37.4: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:24.10 +24:06:35.5: 13.26 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.55 +19:26:21.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:46.35 +22:44:45.6: 12.90 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:46.35 +22:44:45.6: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0099 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:10.77 +25:28:04.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:10.77 +25:28:04.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.1348 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:20:28.67 +19:21:37.4: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.55 +19:26:21.1: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:24.10 +24:06:35.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.26 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.55 +19:26:21.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2191 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:24.10 +24:06:35.5: ref_mag=13.26 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.1575 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:45.18 +21:11:42.3: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.09 +20:15:38.4: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:45.18 +21:11:42.3: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:45.18 +21:11:42.3: ref_mag=13.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1760 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:03.94 +25:33:22.3: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:32.36 +24:02:33.9: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:49.34 +22:53:05.7: 13.67 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.09 +20:15:38.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.09 +20:15:38.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3074 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:03.94 +25:33:22.3: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:32.36 +24:02:33.9: 13.57 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:03.94 +25:33:22.3: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4580 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:32.36 +24:02:33.9: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5891 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:49.34 +22:53:05.7: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:49.34 +22:53:05.7: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7226 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.73 +22:49:03.6: 15.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:33:34.00 +24:30:42.6: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:04.73 +22:49:03.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:33:34.00 +24:30:42.6: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out120095.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out152119.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261446.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261039_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:06.10 +23:38:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261043_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261043_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:49.14 +25:37:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261045_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261051_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261051_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.79 +20:11:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261084_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261084_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261086_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261086_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.33 +19:57:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261099_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261099_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261103_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261103_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:08.29 +24:04:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261105_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261105_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:31.15 +19:38:15.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:22.65 +23:23:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261112_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261112_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:38.01 +21:00:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:48.69 +23:32:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261118_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261118_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.73 +20:31:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261121_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261121_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261124_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261124_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:43.95 +23:55:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261126_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261126_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.67 +23:57:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261129_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261129_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:16.79 +24:29:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261134_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261134_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261135_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261135_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261137_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261137_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261138_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261138_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:45.85 +22:01:38.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261139_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261139_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:15.15 +20:38:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.59 +18:39:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261145_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261145_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:10.23 +24:28:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261146_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261146_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261148_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261148_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.23 +17:48:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:57.77 +23:16:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261153_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261153_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261154_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261154_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.23 +17:47:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261160_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261160_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261164_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261164_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:32.95 +21:26:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261166_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261166_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.60 +18:25:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:28.56 +21:32:37.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261168_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261168_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:08.61 +25:14:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261170_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 261170_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261175_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:12.14 +22:30:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261187_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261187_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:36.52 +22:29:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:39.81 +22:30:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261200_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261200_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.66 +24:02:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261203_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261203_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.21 +22:21:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261205_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261210_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261210_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.53 +20:10:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261236_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261236_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.27 +22:32:08.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261251_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261251_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.90 +25:55:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:16.97 +22:20:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261261_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261261_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261268_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261268_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261274_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261274_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.51 +21:37:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261276_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261276_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:45.98 +21:04:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261285_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.12 +22:53:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261289_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261289_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.21 +21:52:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261299_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261299_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.40 +19:19:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261300_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261300_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.99 +24:26:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261314_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261314_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261317_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261317_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.66 +22:33:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261323_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261323_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:10.82 +21:04:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261330_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261330_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.48 +20:55:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261338_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261338_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:58.95 +20:11:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261342_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261342_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261343_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261344_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261344_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.47 +23:37:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261347_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261347_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.18 +20:55:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261348_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261348_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:35.45 +20:29:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261355_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261355_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.99 +18:02:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:36.55 +25:30:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261358_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261358_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.48 +24:26:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261359_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261359_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.49 +24:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261362_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:16.68 +22:09:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261363_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261363_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.53 +19:58:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:27.04 +23:25:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261372_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261372_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:23.52 +25:04:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261378_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:56.75 +25:01:33.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261380_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261380_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:12.36 +24:17:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261382_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261382_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:41.04 +18:02:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261383_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261383_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:31.29 +25:20:07.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261384_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261384_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.97 +21:10:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261391_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261391_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.08 +23:15:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:35.31 +25:11:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.69 +23:08:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261404_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.31 +26:08:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261408_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261408_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:28.92 +23:10:30.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261409_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261409_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.23 +25:47:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261414_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261414_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.99 +22:43:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261415_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261415_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.61 +21:05:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:48.51 +21:26:58.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261420_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:14.64 +22:51:03.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261428_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261428_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.60 +22:41:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261437_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261437_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:59.27 +23:51:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261438_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261438_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.55 +20:35:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261440_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261440_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261445_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261445_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:10.07 +25:47:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261446_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 261446_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261450_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261450_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:21.43 +24:30:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261452_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261452_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.75 +25:58:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261458_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261458_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261465_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:20.99 +18:34:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261468_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261468_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261476_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261476_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.55 +20:55:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261492_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261492_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:51.64 +17:49:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261497_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261497_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.14 +18:42:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261501_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261501_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.46 +22:44:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261510_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261510_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:44:27.16 +20:42:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.72 +22:43:41.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.24 +22:10:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261526_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261526_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.86 +17:48:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261528_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261528_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.06 +25:01:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261551_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261551_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261552_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261552_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:55.56 +23:58:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261572_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261572_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261575_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261575_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.38 +20:26:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261589_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261589_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261595_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261595_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.20 +23:17:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261597_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261597_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.41 +22:12:14.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.32 +19:25:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261632_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261632_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261650_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261650_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261653_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261653_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:00.95 +23:37:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261668_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261668_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:11.76 +24:36:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261669_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261669_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261673_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261673_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:25.20 +23:49:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261688_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 261688_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:10.14 +22:08:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.69 +18:15:20.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120095_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 120095_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 152119_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
Preparing report for the candidate 152119_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_06-18-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0553 did not pass the final checks
