NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-09-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    11.56    23:53:28.97 -16:28:07.0   5733 2266   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    11.52    23:53:28.94 -16:28:07.3   5728 2274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 19.4251  2461271.9251  11.54  23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1
 68.42064 -72.86241 galactic  Aqr  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
23 Thalia                  -0     -0       0  11.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1:  14.89 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-09-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    12.54    23:59:28.35 -16:32:13.8   4865 2305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    12.52    23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.9   4859 2313   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 19.4251  2461271.9251  12.53  23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8
 71.62516 -73.97187 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 9.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
259 Aletheia                -0     -0       0  12.6     0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8:  14.93 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8:  14.92 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?)   Cet-09-Q2b1x1 field processing log
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 2

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits
Field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 287298 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 287298 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits

renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1419.8979 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.5619 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1419.0790 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 511.2383 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.617202 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001 INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:11:33.5515787' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:11:33.5515787' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.4246938773 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:11:43.4515926' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.4248084608 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997122150363 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998007313908 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.4877777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 201.712777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.71933222417945 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.9699993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits :) Spent 0.522582 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 21.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T05:12:22.1745659' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T10:12:22.1745659' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61271.4252566434 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T10:12:32.0748262' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61271.4253712269 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 359.997122103592 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -17.9998007374908 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 35.4252777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 201.935555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.72195296619343 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20440 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 21.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 21.9500007629395 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0 Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0 Record 57: "PRESSURE= 900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0 Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0 Record 59: "WINDDIR = 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0 Record 60: "WINDGUST= 7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0 Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0 Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits :) Spent 0.506822 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits


fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.92480962 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt '../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01571 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K1pXbAJDrA Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WjDrZ8Yd2p Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xLUQG1zPPc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FujnFRwFuw Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 2.6 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 14.7 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.7 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory ############ /tmp/tmp.K1pXbAJDrA (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460 Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.WjDrZ8Yd2p (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454 Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.xLUQG1zPPc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=283, bad_region=856, passed=4347 Got 4347 stars (including 3292 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4347 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5942 through 0 to 8.4399, gap 8.4399 to 351.5942 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3200 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3198 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5947 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5947 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3201 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3198 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3670 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 3198 stars left (next iteration limit 3517) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=6.817 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.463 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.369 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3198 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.361 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3198 robust_rms_before=1.259 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.321 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.341 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.354 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.369 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.354 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits N_match=3198 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.352 n_q1=1015 n_q2=587 n_q3=1037 n_q4=559 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.076 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FujnFRwFuw (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=281, bad_region=870, passed=4354 Got 4354 stars (including 3284 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4354 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5950 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5950 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3196 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3194 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3194 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3194 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5953 through 0 to 8.4408, gap 8.4408 to 351.5953 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 3197 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3193 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3193 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3667 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 3193 stars left (next iteration limit 3513) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3193 robust_rms=6.699 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.380 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3193 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3193 robust_rms=0.326 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3193 robust_rms_before=0.988 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.319 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.364 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.381 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.364 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits N_match=3193 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.361 n_q1=1018 n_q2=584 n_q3=1028 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits' ################################### # Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above) ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041 ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054 new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits sigma_overall=0.328 worst_q_ratio=1.076 new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.141 reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475 warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference ###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482_astrometric_residuals.png (3198 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483_astrometric_residuals.png (3193 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:14.6: 10.80 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.3: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.3: 10.82 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:14.6: 10.74 +/- 0.01 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.01 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.3: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9593 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:14.6: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0000 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90) make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20091_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    11.01    23:55:48.55 -17:47:26.3   5392 3064   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    10.92    23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.3   5386 3071   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    10.96    00:05:56.40 -20:39:14.2   3949 4799   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    11.04    00:05:56.36 -20:39:15.0   3944 4806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20419_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20419_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    10.93    00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.6   4471 1187   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20478_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20478_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    11.19    23:49:36.82 -15:51:00.1   6295 1904   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits **** FOUND 23:49:36.82 -15:51:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    7.99    23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.6   7147 1574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits exists and is non-empty ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image) verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits (1st new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0079 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits (2nd new image) verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Image size: 936.9'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis Image center: 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 Second-epoch image center 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.932 -18:00:35.03 Second-epoch second image center 23:59:57.556 -17:59:49.76 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01571 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for a parallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8Bw4rSYNP7 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bORSBM86w6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits &> /tmp/tmp.csh1IgFTtF Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FBGfKkdlCE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race) Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8) The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max) Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero). Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches. Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars. util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7) ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 18 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 2.5 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 14.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.8Bw4rSYNP7 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965 Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.bORSBM86w6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162 Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway) WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069 The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.csh1IgFTtF (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1221, bad_region=3369, passed=20293 Got 20293 stars (including 16366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20293 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5199 through 0 to 8.4399, gap 8.4399 to 351.5199 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17739 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5204 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5204 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17739 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17739 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5303) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=6.569 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.460 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.418 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4822 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.400 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4822 robust_rms_before=1.254 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.348 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.377 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.397 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.418 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.397 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.397 n_q1=1576 n_q2=874 n_q3=1556 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.127 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.FBGfKkdlCE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all) Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst). SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=3, blended=1255, bad_region=3388, passed=20408 Got 20408 stars (including 16437 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20408 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5157 through 0 to 8.4657, gap 8.4657 to 351.5157 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5160 through 0 to 8.4665, gap 8.4665 to 351.5160 UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6) Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 4835 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17847 with non-zero local correction accuracy Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 4826 stars left (next iteration limit 5308) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=6.599 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.512 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.423 arcsec SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4826 robust_rms=0.358 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.409 arcsec SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3 SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4826 robust_rms_before=0.992 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.349 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.387 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.423 SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.387 arcsec) - keeping the original WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits N_match=4826 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.392 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=1586 n_q2=873 n_q3=1558 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130 The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL) Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:19.03 -21:29:11.4: 13.89 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:25.32 -21:26:41.2: 13.75 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.46 -21:53:48.0: 14.01 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8: 14.93 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.70 -22:12:02.2: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:35.49 -17:15:09.1: 13.16 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:01.19 -21:52:16.1: 14.09 +/- 0.21 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.28 -21:12:35.0: 13.62 +/- 0.13 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:59.00 -14:06:24.8: 13.42 +/- 0.10 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:01.19 -21:52:16.1: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:25.32 -21:26:41.2: 13.83 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:19.03 -21:29:11.4: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.70 -22:12:02.2: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.46 -21:53:48.0: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.28 -21:12:35.0: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:59.00 -14:06:24.8: 13.25 +/- 0.08 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:35.49 -17:15:09.1: 13.08 +/- 0.07 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.14 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.06 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.12 +/- 0.05 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:25.32 -21:26:41.2: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5692 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:19.03 -21:29:11.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7240 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:59.00 -14:06:24.8: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2618 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.46 -21:53:48.0: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7070 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:01.19 -21:52:16.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7455 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:35.49 -17:15:09.1: ref_mag=13.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3897 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.28 -21:12:35.0: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.6861 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.70 -22:12:02.2: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4983 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:50.18 -22:00:50.4: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.52 -22:09:33.0: 13.70 +/- 0.14 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:30.09 -21:22:44.5: 13.81 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3: 13.89 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:14:09.01 -20:39:52.5: 14.28 +/- 0.22 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:16.56 -16:28:37.5: 13.62 +/- 0.11 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:50.18 -22:00:50.4: 13.75 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.11 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:50.18 -22:00:50.4: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.7385 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.52 -22:09:33.0: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:30.09 -21:22:44.5: 14.07 +/- 0.19 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:16.56 -16:28:37.5: 14.02 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:14:09.01 -20:39:52.5: 13.93 +/- 0.16 detection Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10 Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.51 -21:18:39.3: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6881 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.52 -22:09:33.0: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7736 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.09 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:30.09 -21:22:44.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6768 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.05 +/- 0.13 Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:16.56 -16:28:37.5: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7863 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90) Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:09.01 -20:39:52.5: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.8780 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90) Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21545.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22131.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20953_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.30    23:47:59.02 -14:06:24.7   6556 0841   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.23    23:47:58.98 -14:06:24.8   6550 0848   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20954_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 20954_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.46    00:12:35.53 -17:15:09.5   2970 2754   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.34    00:12:35.46 -17:15:08.8   2964 2762   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 21545_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 Preparing report for the candidate 21545_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 Preparing report for the candidate 22131_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 22904_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 22904_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.49    00:18:28.74 -22:12:02.1   2191 5778   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.51    00:18:28.66 -22:12:02.4   2185 5786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23094_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.57    00:15:25.29 -21:26:41.1   2613 5304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.57    00:15:25.36 -21:26:41.3   2607 5312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23179_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23179_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.65    00:18:21.29 -21:12:35.8   2194 5173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.73    00:18:21.28 -21:12:34.3   2188 5181   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23239_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23239_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.69    00:18:01.20 -21:52:15.6   2251 5574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.82    00:18:01.17 -21:52:16.6   2245 5582   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23272_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23272_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.71    00:17:09.45 -21:53:47.4   2373 5586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.71    00:17:09.48 -21:53:48.6   2368 5594   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23280_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23280_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.69    00:15:19.03 -21:29:12.1   2628 5329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.77    00:15:19.03 -21:29:10.8   2623 5337   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23284_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23284_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.66    00:13:19.52 -21:18:39.9   2909 5215   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.72    00:13:19.50 -21:18:38.6   2903 5223   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23366_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.71    00:15:30.11 -21:22:44.1   2601 5264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.65    00:15:30.07 -21:22:44.8   2596 5272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23450_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23450_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.78    00:14:08.96 -20:39:52.3   2784 4825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    14.12    00:14:09.06 -20:39:52.7   2779 4833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23506_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23506_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.77    00:06:56.61 -22:09:31.9   3816 5714   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.78    00:06:56.44 -22:09:34.1   3811 5722   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23592_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23592_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.72    00:05:16.62 -16:28:36.9   4023 2272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.87    00:05:16.51 -16:28:38.1   4018 2280   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 23945_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 23945_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 1   2026 08 19.42481    2461271.92481    13.74    23:47:50.31 -22:00:49.8   6501 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-11-33_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0482.fits Discovery image 2   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    13.74    23:47:50.06 -22:00:50.9   6496 5643   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    11.05    00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.7   4471 1187   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits **** FOUND 00:02:07.41 -14:40:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 08 19.42537    2461271.92537    7.92    23:43:49.92 -15:17:08.7   7147 1574   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_053722_TTUQ2b1x1_1027092_ECAxK89z/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-19_05-12-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0483.fits **** FOUND 23:43:49.92 -15:17:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 8s Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8 ########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8 ################################################################################### 23:53:28.96 -16:28:07.1 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 23:59:28.36 -16:32:13.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is V36 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.92480962 -observatory V36 09:21:43.83 +17:01:00.3 Mercury (-1.6mag) 12:40:48.01 -06:25:09.3 Venus (-4.5mag) 06:21:32.99 +23:41:32.9 Mars (1.3mag) 08:52:55.82 +18:03:11.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag) 00:55:14.83 +03:04:58.0 Saturn (0.5mag) 04:12:49.30 +20:59:46.1 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:15:21.44 +00:07:50.5 Neptune (7.7mag) 20:27:06.08 -23:34:14.2 Pluto (14.5mag) 14:55:58.55 -22:28:04.7 Moon (-10.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 19 05:39 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.92480962: 08:52:51.11 +18:03:34.5 Io (6.1mag) 08:53:06.68 +18:02:22.9 Europa (6.3mag) 08:52:41.88 +18:04:17.5 Ganymede (5.6mag) 08:52:31.57 +18:05:01.0 Callisto (6.8mag) 08:50:23.62 +18:09:26.3 Himalia (15.7mag) 08:53:00.32 +18:02:52.7 Thebe (16.6mag) 08:50:01.84 +18:05:49.4 Elara (17.7mag) 08:57:04.24 +17:37:39.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag) 08:55:21.14 +18:16:03.5 Carme (19.0mag) 00:55:24.23 +03:05:04.7 Titan (8.4mag) 00:55:10.14 +03:05:04.4 Rhea (9.7mag) 00:55:47.96 +03:06:05.9 Iapetus (11.1mag) 00:55:30.31 +03:04:48.2 Hyperion (14.4mag) 00:54:23.16 +02:56:44.2 Phoebe (16.4mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 19 05:39 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.92480962: 19:54:52.29 -16:14:28.9 JWST 17:05:58.35 +40:24:48.0 Chandra 06:37:10.75 +13:26:21.7 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 19 05:39 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.92480962 -observatory V36 03:25:29.68 +18:14:29.9 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist) 17:59:56.44 -34:30:59.2 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 07:03:57.02 -69:21:26.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 06:12:31.83 +33:14:23.0 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 04:14:07.45 +41:38:03.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF) 22:29:13.40 +30:38:11.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 06:54:14.77 +26:20:20.3 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 10:31:58.63 +27:58:35.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 09:36:21.42 +05:18:21.0 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 15:14:51.64 -12:44:54.4 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 20:56:43.78 +64:32:10.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 15:38:23.36 -13:58:04.4 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 08:20:14.59 +31:52:05.2 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 15:05:47.73 +15:31:59.6 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 18:49:55.70 +43:28:07.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 20:53:51.58 +49:39:17.1 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS) 05:23:41.43 -12:53:52.2 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 07:03:01.51 +22:08:51.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 10:48:55.33 +20:09:49.2 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin) 13:05:20.60 +01:34:12.4 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 16:07:17.47 +76:38:33.3 16.5mag C/2026 A2 (Bok) 03:09:53.40 +46:20:20.2 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 11:56:17.18 +09:39:38.3 17.4mag A/2026 E1 22:09:42.32 -31:26:34.0 7.1mag 10P/Tempel 11:35:51.42 -04:07:16.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 11:30:28.41 +00:58:42.3 17.4mag 63P/Wild 00:52:27.60 -05:56:47.0 15.4mag 65P/Gunn 06:00:27.97 +20:22:23.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels 20:28:08.93 -24:43:33.9 17.5mag 84P/Giclas 03:10:08.45 +14:23:47.4 16.9mag 88P/Howell 08:23:35.86 +26:02:29.5 16.4mag 93P/Lovas 04:38:44.18 +21:15:27.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima 06:33:09.10 +28:48:12.3 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff 09:44:50.84 +24:39:03.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley 12:06:26.53 -14:30:55.9 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos 05:52:41.52 +21:04:37.9 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 06:47:14.03 +18:17:09.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller 00:00:38.79 +03:11:36.1 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma 03:12:59.97 -18:44:23.0 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS 07:54:02.98 +38:07:26.9 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring 11:40:48.64 +34:06:00.7 12.1mag 169P/NEAT 03:01:51.93 +09:28:32.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught 16:48:33.13 -10:55:18.3 18.0mag 235P/LINEAR 20:16:57.02 -52:09:04.1 17.9mag 259P/Garradd 03:54:46.75 +29:42:48.2 15.3mag 260P/McNaught 07:38:45.66 +37:16:13.3 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR 15:14:48.66 +01:53:12.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski 09:11:04.42 +17:49:01.6 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 19 05:39 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60 SN 2026sfn 2026-08-16.3 17.09 23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00 SN 2026yib 2026-08-14.85 17.36 00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70 SN 2026whu 2026-08-14.96 16.5 19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90 ASASSN-26ew 2026-08-13.82 14.73 13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00 SN 2026wkv 2026-08-10.12 15.83 05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-10.59 9.34 01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10 SN2026wpd 2026-08-9.34 16.37 23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80 SN2026wjs 2026-08-9.35 17.12 16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70 AT2026xau 2026-08-9.3 17.71 01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50 SN2026weo 2026-08-7.46 15.76 00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08 22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17 14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02 12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61 16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09 01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97 21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13 18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06 12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98 13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38 18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63 14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36 20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83 18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86 03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12 18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16 04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02 18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73 17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01 14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46 10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67 14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11 10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58 19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5 02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86 23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47 02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78 18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29 13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72 17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66 11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3 23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15 20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53 19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88 11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82 19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31 17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67 19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52 18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92 19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91 19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81 04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96 13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01 16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07 10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63 14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62 13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09 00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13 11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56 21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14 17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72 14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53 20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4 15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57 23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64 17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15 00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34 20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93 23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83 02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52 21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05 17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62 13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24 00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22 14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32 12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69 12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02 10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75 13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58 00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58 01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15 21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24 06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02 20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12 11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63 11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35 19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28 14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.64 11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46 21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86 00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34 15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44 11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55 13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96 02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37 17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7 01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8 16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8 09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63 21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 19 05:39 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag 19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag 00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag 02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag 00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag 00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag 20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag 21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag 00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag 00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag 14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag 00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag 00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag 05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag 22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag 09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag 00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag 00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag 00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag 18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3 TCP J18251276-2225293 2026-08-19.1062 9.4mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 19 05:39 tocp_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ : 14:17:41.187 +58:11:22.15 AT 2026xar 2026-08-04.19 19.1338 20:23:39.247 +11:42:39.44 SN 2026xaq 2026-08-03.95 19.47 20:19:04.225 +25:37:48.81 AT 2026xap 2026-08-03.44 18.58 12:02:08.871 -33:06:45.84 AT 2026xao 2026-08-03.72 19.152 17:22:14.965 +09:02:31.04 AT 2026xan 2026-08-04.21 19.0651 16:26:48.114 +00:11:54.67 AT 2026xam 2026-08-02.17 20.0303 15:27:21.981 +32:14:38.20 AT 2026xal 2026-08-04.18 19.7982 14:23:54.444 +14:25:40.42 AT 2026xak 2026-07-14.22 20.7881 15:31:24.622 +04:06:01.15 AT 2026xaj 2026-08-02.18 20.5636 14:35:58.114 +53:44:16.90 AT 2026xai 2026-08-02.20 20.1016 18:19:05.698 +53:11:07.41 AT 2026xah 2026-08-02.19 20.0688 20:55:20.373 -00:21:55.35 AT 2026xag 2026-08-03.47 20.94 14:15:21.615 +05:15:37.35 AT 2026xaf 2026-08-03.30 20.31 14:14:04.946 +13:34:28.62 AT 2026xae 2026-08-03.27 20.15 21:25:11.950 -47:08:43.45 AT 2026xad 2026-06-19.54 20.42 00:02:18.948 +29:04:39.95 AT 2026xac 2026-07-29.51 19.76 21:35:48.554 -26:40:57.79 AT 2026xab 2026-06-16.55 20.65 20:00:04.333 -34:58:06.08 AT 2026xaa 2026-06-16.49 20.62 14:56:06.142 +19:59:52.91 AT 2026wzz 2026-04-20.54 21.17 15:43:22.735 -12:32:40.12 AT 2026wzy 2026-01-29.65 20.48 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 19 05:39 tns_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 104 C - WARNING