This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4216 2461271.9216 13.92 07:42:08.77 +41:25:24.5
177.85036 26.62448 galactic Lyn Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 5.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.705 Erminia 1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:08.77 +41:25:24.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:42:08.77 +41:25:24.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9216,13.92,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4216 13.92CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4216 2461271.9216 13.70 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9
178.00159 21.45581 galactic Aur Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.1 pix
The object was found in VSX 0" NSVS 4698677
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.503 CV Y 1.080 CV 2453479.72300 0.536804700000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.07
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 4698677,2461271.9216,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 4698677 20260819.4216 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.75319547 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461082.75319547 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461271.92190279 19.08.2026 10:07:22.401 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15323
Objects passed selection criteria: 15268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11715
Average stars matched: 11452 (97.755 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245580 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 05:11:57 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461082.75319547 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
First image: 2461082.75319547 11.02.2026 06:04:26.089 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Last image: 2461271.92190279 19.08.2026 10:07:22.401 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 25 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 91718
Objects passed selection criteria: 91525
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 72789.8
Average stars matched: 70580.2 (96.9645 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 546756 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 05:13:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.92128358
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23
Second-epoch image center 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23
Second-epoch image center 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87
Second-epoch second image center 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01014 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Iiebo5mgs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ocl7xl1XtW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ve0ry2rXxz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uWRhjM675I
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 16318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0695 to 125.3802 deg, Dec +32.1947 to +43.3174 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0695 to 125.3802 deg, Dec 32.1947 to 43.3174 deg
Loaded 9693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7021 out of 7662 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7662 out of 16318 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.902900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.902900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 16318 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0695 to 125.3802 deg, Dec +32.1947 to +43.3174 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0695 to 125.3802 deg, Dec 32.1947 to 43.3174 deg
Loaded 9693 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7021 out of 7662 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7662 out of 16318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 16231 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0696 to 125.3801 deg, Dec +32.1948 to +43.3244 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0696 to 125.3801 deg, Dec 32.1948 to 43.3244 deg
Loaded 9696 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7035 out of 7655 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7655 out of 16231 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.2 pix Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
2.4 pix fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.4 mag. Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.0Iiebo5mgs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1382, bad_region=0, passed=16318
Got 16318 stars (including 14910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4821 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4821 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4820 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4820 stars left (next iteration limit 5303)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4820 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.534 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=979 n_q2=1334 n_q3=1027 n_q4=1480 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.442
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ocl7xl1XtW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1358, bad_region=0, passed=16231
Got 16231 stars (including 14843 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16231 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4826 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4826 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.2 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4848 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16231 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4824 stars left (next iteration limit 5308)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits N_match=4824 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.529 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=978 n_q2=1336 n_q3=1035 n_q4=1475 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.413
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ve0ry2rXxz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, bad_region=0, passed=7300
Got 7300 stars (including 6860 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7300 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4834 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7300 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4805 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=7.705 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.507 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.527 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.880 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4805 robust_rms=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.505 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4805 robust_rms_before=1.497 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.366 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.387 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.471 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.505
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.471 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=4805 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.483 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1563 n_q2=791 n_q3=1514 n_q4=937 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uWRhjM675I (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=446, bad_region=0, passed=7403
Got 7403 stars (including 6950 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7403 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4799 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7403 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4800 stars left (next iteration limit 5278)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=7.375 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.191 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.529 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.962 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4800 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.565 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4800 robust_rms_before=1.427 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.364 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.476 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.565
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.476 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=4800 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.334 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1557 n_q2=804 n_q3=1505 n_q4=934 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.237
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits sigma_overall=0.371 worst_q_ratio=1.442
ref2=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits sigma_overall=0.375 worst_q_ratio=1.413
new1=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits sigma_overall=0.378 worst_q_ratio=1.280
new2=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.376 worst_q_ratio=1.237
reference average sigma_overall=0.373 worst_q_ratio=1.4275
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229_astrometric_residuals.png (4820 matched stars from wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230_astrometric_residuals.png (4824 matched stars from wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432_astrometric_residuals.png (4805 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (4800 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20945_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20945_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:28.29 +33:26:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20959_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20959_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:46.57 +40:07:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15978_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 15978_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:47:51.89 +33:03:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13733_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 13733_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.58 +33:22:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lyn-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 945.3'x627.0' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23
Second-epoch image center 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0152 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:38:12.034 +37:59:53.23
Second-epoch image center 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0198 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:38:15.873 +38:00:23.87
Second-epoch second image center 07:38:14.641 +38:00:57.34
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01014 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h1ML6KqCH8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ff5vi38HPL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cfn4zVrSCL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gcYziRoeaN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits and wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 99584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0641 to 125.4282 deg, Dec +32.1471 to +43.3237 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0641 to 125.4282 deg, Dec 32.1471 to 43.3237 deg
Loaded 9769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6205 out of 7746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7746 out of 99584 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.783100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.783100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.57
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 99584 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0641 to 125.4282 deg, Dec +32.1471 to +43.3237 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0641 to 125.4282 deg, Dec 32.1471 to 43.3237 deg
Loaded 9769 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6205 out of 7746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7746 out of 99584 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 99307 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 104.0644 to 125.3950 deg, Dec +32.1474 to +43.3272 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 104.0644 to 125.3950 deg, Dec 32.1474 to 43.3272 deg
Loaded 9763 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 6222 out of 7746 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 7746 out of 99307 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
2.0 pix Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
2.3 pix fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
15.6 mag. Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.h1ML6KqCH8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=39, blended=8077, bad_region=0, passed=99545
Got 99545 stars (including 91265 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99545 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4822 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4822 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4822 stars left (next iteration limit 5304)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits N_match=4822 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.306 n_q1=1007 n_q2=1293 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1471 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.383
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits -region wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ff5vi38HPL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits' -> 'wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=7987, bad_region=1, passed=99271
Got 99271 stars (including 91128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 99271 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4828 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4828 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.1 to 43.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 99271 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5310)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.506 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.360 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.302 n_q1=1005 n_q2=1305 n_q3=1063 n_q4=1454 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.412
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits -region wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cfn4zVrSCL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=2105, bad_region=25, passed=47136
Got 47136 stars (including 44941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47136 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 668 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4810 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47136 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4810 stars left (next iteration limit 5289)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=7.815 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.046 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.847 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4810 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4810 robust_rms_before=1.498 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.365 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.459 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.504
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.459 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=4810 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.398 n_q1=1571 n_q2=803 n_q3=1477 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.262
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gcYziRoeaN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2175, bad_region=28, passed=47254
Got 47254 stars (including 44979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 47254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4809 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 610 to 669 (Dec 32.0 to 43.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 47254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5288)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.598 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.226 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.543 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.919 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.563 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=1.425 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.361 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.393 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.461 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.563
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.461 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.380 n_q1=1573 n_q2=806 n_q3=1465 n_q4=965 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.283
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-06-28_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_050912_TTUQ1b1x1_3943707_IzeebdlG/wcs_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lyn-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:06:23.82 +37:05:53.4: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:32.21 +36:00:47.4: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:51.56 +33:09:17.5: 13.33 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:11:51.56 +33:09:17.5: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:10:32.21 +36:00:47.4: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:00:00.67 +34:51:37.5: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:06:23.82 +37:05:53.4: 14.12 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:47:54.42 +42:17:47.6: 13.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:51.56 +33:09:17.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2441 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:32.21 +36:00:47.4: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3772 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 08:11:11.69 +32:55:04.1: 10.39 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:23.82 +37:05:53.4: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0802 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:25:04.67 +37:13:30.2: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:01:00.32 +33:07:06.2: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:00:00.67 +34:51:37.5: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:47:54.42 +42:17:47.6: 13.00 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 08:11:11.69 +32:55:04.1: 10.37 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.38 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 08:11:11.69 +32:55:04.1: ref_mag=10.38 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7867 delta=-0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:47:54.42 +42:17:47.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0514 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:00.67 +34:51:37.5: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8732 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:25:04.67 +37:13:30.2: 12.96 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:25:04.67 +37:13:30.2: ref_mag=12.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8755 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:01:00.32 +33:07:06.2: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:00.32 +33:07:06.2: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8745 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:10:03.10 +35:51:53.6: 13.59 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:59:17.55 +34:40:47.2: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:10:03.10 +35:51:53.6: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:03.10 +35:51:53.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4201 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:18:01.76 +40:33:05.7: 13.80 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:59:17.55 +34:40:47.2: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:59:17.55 +34:40:47.2: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0679 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:41:35.77 +40:41:49.6: 14.28 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:35:34.31 +39:42:52.5: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:11:14.61 +35:38:49.5: 13.87 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:42:08.77 +41:25:24.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:18:01.76 +40:33:05.7: 13.72 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:41:35.77 +40:41:49.6: 14.12 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:35:34.31 +39:42:52.5: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:11:14.61 +35:38:49.5: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:42:08.77 +41:25:24.5: 16.22 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.71 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:34.31 +39:42:52.5: ref_mag=13.71 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5772 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:11:14.61 +35:38:49.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6458 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:01.76 +40:33:05.7: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5746 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:35.77 +40:41:49.6: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8334 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-04-26_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0229.fits at 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9: 14.77 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-05-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0230.fits at 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9: 14.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.76 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:16:08.17 +39:52:16.9: ref_mag=14.76 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6956 delta=1.06 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out117945.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out29758.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117176_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117176_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117179_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117179_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:28:48.19 +34:02:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117182_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117182_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:31.53 +33:46:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117191_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117191_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:51.04 +41:03:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117196_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117196_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.51 +37:31:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117198_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117198_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117202_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117202_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:59.77 +37:45:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117203_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117203_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:22.71 +41:05:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117205_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117205_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117207_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117207_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.23 +34:46:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117208_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117208_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117212_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117212_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:23.62 +40:33:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117213_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117213_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117216_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117216_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:16.30 +34:04:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117217_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117217_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117412_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117412_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:18.00 +39:47:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117429_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117429_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:23.99 +39:48:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117488_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117488_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:49.69 +33:53:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117493_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117493_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:16.72 +37:10:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117517_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117517_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117523_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117523_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117570_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117570_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:24.99 +36:18:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117577_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117577_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:55.50 +33:43:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117592_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117592_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:50.23 +33:36:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117603_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117603_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:12.74 +36:09:05.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117607_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117607_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:12.16 +38:17:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117620_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117620_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:03:59.68 +33:03:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117639_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117639_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:33.87 +42:05:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117652_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117652_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:24:42.21 +41:58:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117660_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117660_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:20.44 +35:09:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117663_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117663_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:42:50.73 +34:00:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117673_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117673_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:31.52 +37:20:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117675_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117675_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:47.09 +34:14:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117687_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117687_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117694_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117694_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:07:53.34 +38:35:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117697_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117697_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:17.51 +39:18:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117699_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117699_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:39.07 +36:02:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117705_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117705_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:08:34.56 +40:49:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117715_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117715_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:50:02.87 +39:45:44.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117720_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117720_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:37.70 +39:17:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117722_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117722_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117732_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117732_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:56.07 +41:39:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117734_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117734_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:35.29 +35:26:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117740_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117740_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:59.84 +38:22:54.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117746_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117746_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:55:10.17 +41:56:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117754_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117754_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:18:09.72 +40:52:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117765_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117765_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:02.42 +39:18:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117768_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117768_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:52:02.10 +36:11:20.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117776_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117776_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:33:32.08 +37:10:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117787_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117787_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:37.94 +36:18:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117803_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117803_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:15.82 +35:10:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117811_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117811_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117839_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117839_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117840_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117840_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:42.98 +41:47:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117844_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117844_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117862_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117862_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:30:56.02 +40:21:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117896_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 117896_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117945_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 117945_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 50844_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 50844_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:10.93 +37:42:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89174_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 89174_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:01:19.43 +34:58:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29758_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 29758_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20862_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20862_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 08:16:46.52 +40:07:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63613_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 63613_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:13.58 +33:22:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32122_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32122_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:23:34.58 +39:34:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02686_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 02686_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (35.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62011_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 62011_fd_Lyn-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_05-07-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks