This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,8.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 8.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 11.57 23:34:05.07 +02:47:33.3
87.97419 -54.74205 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.236 Honoria -0 -0 0 11.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:05.07 +02:47:33.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:05.07 +02:47:33.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,11.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 11.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 11.98 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.4
99.08487 -66.58846 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -1 -0 1 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.4: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,11.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 11.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,8.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 8.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 12.54 00:07:21.56 -00:01:41.2
99.78592 -60.90349 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.317 Roxane 0 -1 1 12.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:07:21.56 -00:01:41.2: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:07:21.56 -00:01:41.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,12.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 12.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 12.73 00:19:50.49 +00:38:54.5
106.35685 -61.20234 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.217 Eudora -0 0 0 12.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:19:50.49 +00:38:54.5: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:19:50.49 +00:38:54.5: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,12.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 12.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 13.51 23:45:28.21 +02:00:15.9
91.71186 -56.81449 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.788 Hohensteina -1 1 1 13.9 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:45:28.21 +02:00:15.9: 14.75 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:45:28.21 +02:00:15.9: 14.53 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.10
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,13.51,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 13.51CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 13.65 23:49:52.83 +01:12:04.3
92.85884 -58.03047 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.570 Kythera -0 -0 0 13.7 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:52.83 +01:12:04.3: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:52.83 +01:12:04.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 13.77 23:58:34.70 -01:19:24.2
94.56334 -61.24929 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.328 Gudrun -1 0 1 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:58:34.70 -01:19:24.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:58:34.70 -01:19:24.2: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,13.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 13.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 14.20 23:55:47.55 -00:40:26.2
93.84262 -60.36434 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 2.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.799 Gudula -0 -1 1 14.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:55:47.55 -00:40:26.2: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:55:47.55 -00:40:26.2: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 14.56 23:48:24.27 +02:42:02.4
93.47328 -56.52245 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 2.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.673 Edda -0 1 1 14.5 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:48:24.27 +02:42:02.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:48:24.27 +02:42:02.4: 15.71 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 19.4029 2461271.9029 14.56 23:49:38.92 -04:17:36.2
87.37995 -62.81892 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 2.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.981 Martina -0 -0 0 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:49:38.92 -04:17:36.2: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:49:38.92 -04:17:36.2: 15.72 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461271.9029,14.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260819.4029 14.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461271.90315755 19.08.2026 09:40:22.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5803
Objects passed selection criteria: 5803
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5491.75
Average stars matched: 5293.75 (96.3946 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 232472 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:43:27 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
First image: 2461242.92203095 21.07.2026 10:07:33.474 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Last image: 2461271.90315755 19.08.2026 09:40:22.812 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 261
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 32518
Objects passed selection criteria: 32428
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 30687.5
Average stars matched: 28727 (93.6114 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 256276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Aug 19 04:44:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.90265058
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:07.006 -01:58:30.62 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:07.006 -01:58:30.62
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0404 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Image size: 941.4'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:06.126 -01:58:30.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.424 -02:00:17.62
Second-epoch image center 00:00:06.126 -01:58:30.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0380 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:07.006 -01:58:30.62
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:06.126 -01:58:30.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00366 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fFBUD0s2Se
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RvTUsIkowV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZhZ2ch8MZL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WiwM8Tsy1k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits and wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits) and catalog (wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.638200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.638200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.01
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to +3.2742 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1391 to 7.8851 deg, Dec -7.2685 to 3.2742 deg
Loaded 113496 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 5537 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (aperture=6.4)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 5464 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to +3.2771 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 352.1355 to 7.8705 deg, Dec -7.2684 to 3.2771 deg
Loaded 113493 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3322 out of 3420 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3420 out of 5464 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
2.2 pix Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
2.1 pix fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.0 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
15.0 mag. Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.fFBUD0s2Se (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=342, bad_region=0, passed=5537
Got 5537 stars (including 5189 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1391 through 0 to 7.8851, gap 7.8851 to 352.1391
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1393 through 0 to 7.8849, gap 7.8849 to 352.1393
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.349 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.323 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1170 n_q3=1280 n_q4=1203 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.085
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RvTUsIkowV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=354, bad_region=0, passed=5461
Got 5461 stars (including 5101 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5461 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1355 through 0 to 7.8705, gap 7.8705 to 352.1355
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4884 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 352.1357 through 0 to 7.8704, gap 7.8704 to 352.1357
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 413 to 468 (Dec -7.3 to 3.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4883 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5461 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4883 stars left (next iteration limit 5372)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits N_match=4883 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.407 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.354 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1180 n_q3=1267 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits -region wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZhZ2ch8MZL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=389, bad_region=0, passed=5548
Got 5548 stars (including 5154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1691, gap 8.1691 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4890 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8564 through 0 to 8.1696, gap 8.1696 to 351.8564
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5548 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=10.753 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.113 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.544 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.381 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=0.996 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.320 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.314 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.381
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.306 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1199 n_q2=1219 n_q3=1203 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.173
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WiwM8Tsy1k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=391, bad_region=0, passed=5583
Got 5583 stars (including 5190 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8568 through 0 to 8.1422, gap 8.1422 to 351.8568
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.8564 through 0 to 8.1428, gap 8.1428 to 351.8564
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 411 to 470 (Dec -7.6 to 3.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5583 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4888 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=10.749 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.489 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.589 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4888 robust_rms=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.375 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4888 robust_rms_before=1.009 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.310 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.305 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.367 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.375
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.367 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits N_match=4888 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1201 n_q2=1229 n_q3=1194 n_q4=1264 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.140
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits -region wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.085
ref2=Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits sigma_overall=0.364 worst_q_ratio=1.116
new1=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits sigma_overall=0.329 worst_q_ratio=1.173
new2=fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits sigma_overall=0.324 worst_q_ratio=1.140
reference average sigma_overall=0.343 worst_q_ratio=1.1005
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000_astrometric_residuals.png (4883 matched stars from wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404_astrometric_residuals.png (4885 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405_astrometric_residuals.png (4888 matched stars from wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-39-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0404.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_044109_TTUQ1b1x1_2746511_2wJivlvX/wcs_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Psc-08-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:06:43.96 -03:54:29.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 23:34:05.07 +02:47:33.3: 15.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:26:53.05 -05:30:59.1: 9.99 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-07-33_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0999.fits at 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.4: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.4: 15.59 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:06:43.96 -03:54:29.8: 11.70 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 00:26:53.05 -05:30:59.1: 10.05 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-08-38_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1000.fits at 23:34:05.07 +02:47:33.3: 15.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.70 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.02 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:43.96 -03:54:29.8: ref_mag=11.70 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6841 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:53.05 -05:30:59.1: ref_mag=10.02 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.1901 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20401.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20445.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20271_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20272_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:41:11.96 +00:47:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20273_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 20280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20401_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 20401_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 20445_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20461_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 20461_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:58:44.40 -01:12:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 03946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32832_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32834_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:34:54.65 +01:50:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32835_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32836_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32836_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32837_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32838_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32838_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32844_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32845_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32845_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32846_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32847_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32847_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32848_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32849_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32850_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32851_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:54.03 -06:17:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32854_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32854_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 32861_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32983_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32983_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:34:05.06 +02:47:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33011_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33011_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:14:17.53 -05:27:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33029_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33029_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33073_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33107_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33117_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33126_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33128_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33128_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33130_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33130_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33139_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33149_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33149_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33196_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33196_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33220_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33266_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33266_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33280_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33287_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33291_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33291_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33293_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33293_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33316_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33316_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33323_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33323_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33338_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33354_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33354_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33363_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33387_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33387_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33394_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33394_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33400_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33402_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33402_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33408_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33408_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33409_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33409_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33410_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33410_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33411_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33411_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33434_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33441_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33449_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33452_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33452_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33461_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33461_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33462_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33462_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33472_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33472_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33479_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33479_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33485_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33485_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33488_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33488_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33503_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33503_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33511_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33511_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33513_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33513_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33515_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33515_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33521_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33521_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33534_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33534_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33542_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33542_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33549_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33549_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33563_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33563_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33573_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33573_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33585_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33585_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33593_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33593_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33596_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33596_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33604_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33604_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33612_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33612_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33617_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33617_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33619_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33619_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33630_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33630_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33631_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33631_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33632_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33632_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33635_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33635_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33646_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33646_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33650_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33650_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33651_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33651_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33655_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33665_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33665_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33677_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33683_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33683_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33687_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33687_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33688_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33689_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33689_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33692_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33692_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33702_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33702_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33703_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33703_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33705_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33705_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33710_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33710_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33711_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33711_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33713_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33713_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33716_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33716_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33723_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33723_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33725_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33727_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33727_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33731_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33731_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33736_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33736_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 23:47:45.28 +02:34:07.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33740_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33740_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33744_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33744_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33746_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 33746_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33752_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33752_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33757_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33757_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33760_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33766_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33766_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33772_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33774_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33774_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33788_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33789_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33790_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33808_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33808_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33815_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33819_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33820_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33821_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33821_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33822_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33822_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33823_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33824_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33824_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33828_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33828_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33831_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33833_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33833_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33855_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33855_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33870_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33872_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33872_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33873_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33873_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33878_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33878_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33879_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33879_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33882_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33882_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33886_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33887_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33887_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33889_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33893_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33899_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33900_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33907_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33907_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33908_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33913_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33913_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33914_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33914_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33917_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33918_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33918_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33919_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33919_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33921_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33921_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33929_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33929_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33930_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33931_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33931_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33932_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33932_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33937_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33937_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33940_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33940_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33941_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33941_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33942_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33946_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33949_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33949_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33954_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33957_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33959_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33959_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33965_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33965_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33966_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33966_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33968_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33976_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33976_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33977_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33977_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33978_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33978_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33979_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33985_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33986_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33989_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33991_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33993_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33994_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33995_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33995_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33999_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 33999_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34001_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34005_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34005_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34006_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34006_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34013_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34020_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34020_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34021_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34021_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34022_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34024_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34025_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34025_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34026_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34028_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34031_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34035_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34037_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34039_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34048_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34049_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34050_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34050_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34053_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34053_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34055_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34055_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34060_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34063_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34064_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34066_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34066_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34068_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 34068_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34072_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34075_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34078_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34079_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34079_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34086_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34086_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34090_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34099_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34102_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34102_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34108_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34108_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34114_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34114_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34116_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34116_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34120_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34120_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34125_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34128_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34128_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:57.49 -06:36:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34129_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34131_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34131_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34133_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34134_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34138_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34138_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34142_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34142_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34153_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34155_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34155_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34163_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34163_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34170_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34173_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34173_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34175_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34175_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34184_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34184_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34185_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
Preparing report for the candidate 34185_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34187_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34187_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34199_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 34216_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 32557_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14352_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 14352_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405
The candidate 26990_fd_Psc-08-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_04-40-22_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0405 did not pass the final checks
