FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last  image: 2461271.80357065 19.08.2026 07:16:58.504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  8379
Objects passed selection criteria:  8375
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 7697.75
Average stars matched: 7167.5 (93.1116 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   234772 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug 19 02:19:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
First image: 2461082.79122913 11.02.2026 06:59:12.197   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Last  image: 2461271.80357065 19.08.2026 07:16:58.504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 63
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 58 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  45886
Objects passed selection criteria:  45810
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.4    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 43194
Average stars matched: 40869.8 (94.619 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   268620 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Wed Aug 19 02:21:47 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cam-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 137779 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 137779 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits


renamed 'Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits_preview.png'

Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 575.4353
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 517.8945
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1199.0398
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 461.3737
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1198.5688
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 461.8325
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.08371
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T02:16:05.2477421' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T07:16:05.2477421' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61271.3028385071 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T07:16:15.1530157' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61271.3029531599 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.997196350752 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000287835684 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.1972222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     354.152777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.63144419978236 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits :)

Spent 0.805109 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-19T02:16:58.5044154' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-19T07:16:58.5044154' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61271.3034549076 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-19T07:17:08.4086314' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61271.3035695371 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     179.997196495931 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     77.5000288387176 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     22.1783333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     354.201944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.63354204428903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cam-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '12 00 00'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+77 30 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29520 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     26.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                  7.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 23.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               900.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 31.2 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 16.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits :)

Spent 0.893290 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/d_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits



fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461271.80295425
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00859 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d4A7X7ojPC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tJOvwgpxCg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RuPNQiqgjS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.bdf7Tg4IFV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2203 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 137.2520 to 228.8003 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2203 deg
Loaded 11837 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5410 out of 5718 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5718 out of 8935 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec +70.5552 to +82.7628 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.7167 to 226.3162 deg, Dec 70.5552 to 82.7628 deg
Loaded 10553 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3703 out of 3846 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3846 out of 9444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 2.3 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.2 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.d4A7X7ojPC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=680, bad_region=0, passed=8935
Got 8935 stars (including 8237 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8935 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4903 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8935 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.462 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.305 n_q1=1059 n_q2=1199 n_q3=1313 n_q4=1330 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.299
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tJOvwgpxCg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=593, bad_region=0, passed=9444
Got 9444 stars (including 8840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9444 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4899 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4895 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4895 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.6 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4897 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 9444 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5384)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.320 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.318 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.311 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1167 n_q3=1319 n_q4=1270 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RuPNQiqgjS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=326, bad_region=0, passed=6352
Got 6352 stars (including 6014 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6352 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6352 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=11.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.469 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.480 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.371 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.833 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.296 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.323 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.334 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.371
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.334 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1326 n_q2=1384 n_q3=1142 n_q4=1038 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.bdf7Tg4IFV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=332, bad_region=0, passed=6293
Got 6293 stars (including 5955 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6293 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4893 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4893 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4893 stars left (next iteration limit 5382)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=11.657 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.832 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.458 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4893 robust_rms=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4893 robust_rms_before=0.812 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.292 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.303 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.326 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.342
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.326 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4893 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1317 n_q2=1401 n_q3=1151 n_q4=1024 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.123
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits sigma_overall=0.355 worst_q_ratio=1.299
ref2=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits sigma_overall=0.320 worst_q_ratio=1.150
new1=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits sigma_overall=0.301 worst_q_ratio=1.146
new2=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits sigma_overall=0.288 worst_q_ratio=1.123
reference average sigma_overall=0.3375 worst_q_ratio=1.2245
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280_astrometric_residuals.png (4896 matched stars from wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266_astrometric_residuals.png (4890 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267_astrometric_residuals.png (4893 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Image size: 941.9'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0162 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Image size: 941.3'x627.3'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:59:58.925 +77:29:59.77
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0247 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  12:00:00.207 +77:30:58.01
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.680 +77:31:27.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00859 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FNi1WSjzp2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ItYgYH6AXf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MdRQxOC8HG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits &> /tmp/tmp.U6ZBKDK2Id
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.749000
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.749000
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.44

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.44

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 51561 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec +69.4278 to +83.2318 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 136.5617 to 229.0190 deg, Dec 69.4278 to 83.2318 deg
Loaded 12006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 5102 out of 5807 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5807 out of 51561 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 48477 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec +70.4537 to +82.7794 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 132.3942 to 226.7803 deg, Dec 70.4537 to 82.7794 deg
Loaded 10790 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3498 out of 3909 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3909 out of 48477 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 59 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 2.2 pix  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
 15.4 mag.  Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FNi1WSjzp2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=2563, bad_region=1, passed=51537
Got 51537 stars (including 48894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 51537 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 797 to 868 (Dec 69.4 to 83.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 51537 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1055 n_q2=1197 n_q3=1288 n_q4=1356 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.284
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ItYgYH6AXf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=2481, bad_region=0, passed=48460
Got 48460 stars (including 45910 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4888 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4888 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 865 (Dec 70.5 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4891 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 48460 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5376)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1139 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1281 n_q4=1272 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MdRQxOC8HG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1209, bad_region=29, passed=36712
Got 36712 stars (including 35420 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36712 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 801 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 36712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 4892 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=11.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.508 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.479 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4892 robust_rms=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.368 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4892 robust_rms_before=0.833 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.293 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.335 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.368
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.335 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits N_match=4892 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.294 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.340 n_q1=1309 n_q2=1391 n_q3=1143 n_q4=1049 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.146
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.U6ZBKDK2Id (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1223, bad_region=31, passed=37312
Got 37312 stars (including 35987 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4890 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 802 to 866 (Dec 70.4 to 82.8)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4892 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4890 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 37312 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4890 stars left (next iteration limit 5379)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=11.675 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.020 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.473 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4890 robust_rms=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.342 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4890 robust_rms_before=0.811 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.288 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.302 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.322 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.342
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.322 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits N_match=4890 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.286 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1314 n_q2=1383 n_q3=1147 n_q4=1046 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:48:44.82 +76:55:10.5:  14.13 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 14:17:04.61 +79:43:01.5:  14.90 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:59:24.05 +81:12:58.4:  14.59 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:35:52.76 +75:04:13.8:  13.88 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:27:02.44 +79:37:53.6:  10.52 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 09:33:38.45 +78:12:47.4:  13.35 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.0:  13.49 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 14:17:04.61 +79:43:01.5:  14.37 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:27:02.44 +79:37:53.6:  10.44 +/- 0.00  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:35:52.76 +75:04:13.8:  13.64 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:48:44.82 +76:55:10.5:  13.93 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.51 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:59:24.05 +81:12:58.4:  14.34 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 14:17:04.61 +79:43:01.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6137 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  10.48 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:35:52.76 +75:04:13.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9858 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:27:02.44 +79:37:53.6: ref_mag=10.48 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.7901 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.44 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:48:44.82 +76:55:10.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0752 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:59:24.05 +81:12:58.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.7287 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 09:33:38.45 +78:12:47.4:  13.28 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 09:33:38.45 +78:12:47.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3255 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.0:  13.26 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.36 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:32:00.55 +74:50:11.0: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4958 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:12:28.65 +77:49:29.2:  13.71 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:12:28.65 +77:49:29.2:  13.63 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:10:33.81 +80:57:27.2:  13.96 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:12:28.65 +77:49:29.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7883 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:49:29.45 +78:59:05.6:  14.11 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:10:33.81 +80:57:27.2:  13.91 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 12:36:28.14 +79:13:30.8:  14.11 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.94 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:10:33.81 +80:57:27.2: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8982 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:49:29.45 +78:59:05.6:  14.12 +/- 0.08  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.11 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:49:29.45 +78:59:05.6: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0221 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 12:36:28.14 +79:13:30.8:  13.99 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.05 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 12:36:28.14 +79:13:30.8: ref_mag=14.05 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1174 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 11:22:00.18 +82:18:03.2:  15.37 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_00-59-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits at 13:04:06.23 +78:12:17.1:  15.22 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 11:22:00.18 +82:18:03.2:  15.64 +/- 0.29  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_01-39-13_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0280.fits at 13:04:06.23 +78:12:17.1:  15.01 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.47 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.10 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 11:22:00.18 +82:18:03.2: ref_mag=15.47 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.9942 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 13:04:06.23 +78:12:17.1: ref_mag=15.10 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=15.0162 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 3s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69540_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69540_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.80    12:28:47.38 +78:22:11.1   3957 2580   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  12:28:47.55 +78:22:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69541_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.71    11:59:24.25 +81:12:57.8   4944 0972   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.74    11:59:23.86 +81:12:59.0   4945 0977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69549_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69549_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.52    14:17:04.21 +79:43:01.2   1450 0593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.76    14:17:05.01 +79:43:01.8   1450 0598   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69558_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.09    13:48:44.96 +76:55:10.7   1238 2485   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.06    13:48:44.67 +76:55:10.4   1239 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69560_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    13.98    13:35:52.71 +75:04:13.8   1115 3693   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.99    13:35:52.81 +75:04:13.8   1116 3699   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69577_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69577_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    10.82    11:27:02.35 +79:37:53.9   5762 1918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    10.76    11:27:02.52 +79:37:53.3   5763 1923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69647_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69647_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    11.52    09:50:04.77 +78:36:05.0   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69710_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69710_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    12.39    11:27:47.36 +79:59:31.0   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69737_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69737_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    12.66    14:33:05.28 +79:38:44.1   1081 0353   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  14:33:05.25 +79:38:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69754_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    12.88    11:21:31.64 +78:05:38.3   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69757_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69757_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    12.63    10:29:45.28 +75:47:47.5   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69772_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69772_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    12.85    09:58:04.18 +79:16:02.1   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69845_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.10    09:59:22.22 +75:35:33.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69849_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69849_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    13.26    09:33:38.49 +78:12:47.1   9140 1671   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.41    09:33:38.41 +78:12:47.7   9141 1676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69867_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.43    10:59:45.96 +79:39:33.3   6493 1805   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:59:45.91 +79:39:33.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69894_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69894_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.54    09:43:13.52 +77:17:57.3   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69910_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69910_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.42    10:40:36.44 +74:52:58.1   7786 4456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:40:36.42 +74:53:00.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69915_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    13.50    12:32:00.76 +74:50:09.4   3436 4641   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.49    12:32:00.34 +74:50:12.6   3438 4646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.67    10:28:32.20 +81:12:21.4   7013 0698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:28:32.10 +81:12:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.63    11:25:05.38 +82:21:41.6   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69935_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69935_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.40    10:57:14.86 +74:22:21.1   7209 4912   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:57:15.02 +74:22:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69945_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.60    10:23:48.07 +78:20:00.3   7708 2294   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:23:48.06 +78:20:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69955_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69955_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    13.80    13:12:28.57 +77:49:30.3   2561 2515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.78    13:12:28.73 +77:49:28.1   2561 2521   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69959_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.76    12:49:00.36 +79:11:59.6   3493 1959   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  12:49:00.30 +79:11:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69963_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69963_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.60    10:05:49.12 +79:00:18.0   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69968_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.64    11:39:18.18 +75:02:01.8   5500 4705   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  11:39:18.32 +75:02:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69969_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69969_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.54    09:58:07.69 +75:50:21.8   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69988_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 69988_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.70    11:32:41.09 +80:07:07.9   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70002_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70002_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    13.88    11:10:33.96 +80:57:27.1   6090 1075   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.92    11:10:33.66 +80:57:27.2   6090 1080   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70019_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70019_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.72    12:34:34.84 +76:02:08.8   3490 3919   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  12:34:34.85 +76:02:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70025_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.51    10:39:16.72 +72:29:40.7   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70029_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.65    10:27:11.61 +79:17:40.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70056_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70056_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.79    10:30:07.64 +74:58:57.2   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70061_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70061_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.85    09:49:49.68 +79:35:50.5   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70064_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70064_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.06    13:49:29.45 +78:59:05.1   1850 1395   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.00    13:49:29.46 +78:59:06.0   1851 1400   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70075_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70075_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.78    10:55:47.74 +77:05:46.1   6922 3293   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:55:47.12 +77:05:45.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70077_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70077_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.84    10:43:14.42 +77:23:45.6   7287 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  10:43:14.29 +77:23:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70082_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70082_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.07    12:36:28.66 +79:13:30.2   3839 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.18    12:36:27.61 +79:13:31.3   3840 2030   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70084_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70084_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.23    10:27:18.28 +75:29:00.9   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70108_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70108_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.13    13:03:06.36 +76:29:41.9   2580 3381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  13:03:06.32 +76:29:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70109_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70109_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.20    11:15:45.54 +78:15:58.5   6170 2707   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  11:15:45.65 +78:15:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70114_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70114_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.86    10:16:55.62 +79:12:50.0   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70115_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.26    10:44:58.93 +77:34:57.0   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.99    10:43:12.12 +72:13:42.7   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.24    12:23:48.27 +75:51:19.4   3857 4098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

**** FOUND  12:23:48.59 +75:51:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70201_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70201_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.37    10:35:04.40 +75:35:45.3   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70220_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70220_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.08    10:30:48.81 +75:22:58.5   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70234_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70234_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.43    10:23:53.94 +80:18:53.3   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70237_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70237_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.55    10:52:20.15 +81:17:30.0   6471 0801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70259_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70259_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.44    10:47:21.11 +75:13:26.0   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70274_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70274_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.47    10:52:41.89 +80:30:47.1   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70289_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70289_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.65    11:35:31.56 +77:27:17.0   5587 3245   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70303_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70303_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.34    09:42:58.52 +76:58:46.7   9265 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70310_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70310_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.60    10:30:34.50 +80:53:04.9   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70345_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70345_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.20    10:08:50.05 +75:14:02.6   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (26.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70416_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70416_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    14.79    11:13:52.74 +78:11:16.5   6234 2746   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (29.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70418_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70418_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.97    11:21:59.90 +82:18:04.6   5741 0300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    15.03    11:22:00.47 +82:18:01.8   5741 0305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70420_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 70420_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 19.30295    2461271.80295    14.98    13:04:06.03 +78:12:16.9   2887 2392   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-05_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0266.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    15.07    13:04:06.43 +78:12:17.3   2888 2397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40543_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267
The candidate 40543_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 19.30357    2461271.80357    13.47    10:23:20.27 +79:38:26.1   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-19_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_021736_TTUQ1b1x1_810527_TDrHnjMT/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-19_02-16-58_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0267.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.9") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cam-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.80295425 -observatory V36
09:20:44.63 +17:04:51.9 Mercury (-1.6mag)
12:40:23.67 -06:21:44.3 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:21:12.11 +23:41:36.0 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:49.32 +18:03:36.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:15.87 +03:05:06.2 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:48.72 +20:59:44.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:21.99 +00:07:54.3 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:06.75 -23:34:11.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:48:20.26 -22:10:39.7 Moon (-10.1mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 363 Aug 19 02:19 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.80295425:
08:52:44.63 +18:03:59.0 Io (6.1mag)
08:53:00.43 +18:02:46.9 Europa (6.3mag)
08:52:35.09 +18:04:43.6 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:52:25.58 +18:05:23.6 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:50:17.14 +18:09:46.9 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:52:52.50 +18:03:23.2 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:49:55.31 +18:06:11.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:56:57.78 +17:38:07.9 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:55:15.17 +18:16:26.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:25.64 +03:05:11.6 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:11.92 +03:05:13.3 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:48.86 +03:06:12.6 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:31.46 +03:04:55.2 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:24.35 +02:56:53.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 19 02:19 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461271.80295425:
19:54:35.09 -16:21:57.6 JWST
16:49:58.22 +43:43:35.5 Chandra
05:19:55.78 +43:05:22.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 19 02:19 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461271.80295425 -observatory V36
03:25:22.70 +18:13:58.5 17.5mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:56.78 -34:31:05.9 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:50.56 -69:21:06.1 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:30.24 +33:14:12.7 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:13:49.89 +41:35:52.7 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:29:19.68 +30:38:49.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:54:08.01 +26:20:28.1 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:51.77 +27:58:53.9 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:36:16.51 +05:18:21.7 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:49.69 -12:44:35.4 18.0mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:56:52.36 +64:33:18.0 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:38:28.35 -13:57:24.9 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:20:06.91 +31:51:43.4 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:48.03 +15:32:03.9 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:50:03.64 +43:28:03.3 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:54:02.78 +49:39:09.9 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:23:36.18 -12:53:52.3 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:02:57.42 +22:10:11.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:48:44.48 +20:10:19.6 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:05:15.51 +01:34:44.4 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:07:10.31 +76:39:26.9 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:53.09 +46:20:16.5 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:56:10.72 +09:38:57.7 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:09:36.41 -31:24:19.8 7.1mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:46.74 -04:06:46.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:30:13.46 +01:01:05.3 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:29.62 -05:56:24.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
06:00:12.09 +20:22:40.8 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:15.11 -24:42:52.7 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:10:03.62 +14:23:24.3 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:23:18.36 +26:03:36.0 16.4mag 93P/Lovas
04:38:22.42 +21:12:33.4 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:32:45.47 +28:49:23.2 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:44:33.72 +24:40:25.8 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:06:11.29 -14:28:12.2 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:52:31.30 +21:04:43.8 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:47:02.13 +18:17:36.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:41.32 +03:11:48.8 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:13:07.61 -18:44:38.5 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:53:38.82 +38:07:23.6 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:42:30.31 +34:16:16.3 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:01:41.03 +09:28:42.2 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:48:27.80 -10:54:45.7 18.0mag 235P/LINEAR
20:16:59.43 -52:09:54.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:54:25.70 +29:39:56.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:38:24.16 +37:16:37.4 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:45.30 +01:54:02.2 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:10:57.77 +17:49:23.7 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 19 02:19 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
21:28:47.85 +20:31:03.60  SN 2026sfn  2026-08-16.3 17.09
23:01:28.67 -61:00:39.00  SN 2026yib  2026-08-14.85 17.36
00:22:23.20 -32:16:02.70  SN 2026whu  2026-08-14.96 16.5
19:56:21.71 -37:24:19.90  ASASSN-26ew  2026-08-13.82 14.73
13:53:14.21 +00:26:52.00  SN 2026wkv  2026-08-10.12 15.83
05:21:07.61 +23:38:20.10  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-10.59 9.34
01:28:20.49 +40:13:27.10  SN2026wpd  2026-08-9.34 16.37
23:47:50.87 +49:28:49.80  SN2026wjs  2026-08-9.35 17.12
16:03:20.92 +17:43:23.70  AT2026xau  2026-08-9.3 17.71
01:10:22.05 -09:34:08.50  SN2026weo  2026-08-7.46 15.76
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.72 -58:37:47.60  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.64
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 19 02:19 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
18:25:12.76 -22:25:29.3  TCP J18251276-2225293  2026-08-19.1062  9.4mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 19 02:19 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
15:31:24.622 +04:06:01.15  AT 2026xaj  2026-08-02.18 20.5636
14:35:58.114 +53:44:16.90  AT 2026xai  2026-08-02.20 20.1016
18:19:05.698 +53:11:07.41  AT 2026xah  2026-08-02.19 20.0688
20:55:20.373 -00:21:55.35  AT 2026xag  2026-08-03.47 20.94
14:15:21.615 +05:15:37.35  AT 2026xaf  2026-08-03.30 20.31
14:14:04.946 +13:34:28.62  AT 2026xae  2026-08-03.27 20.15
21:25:11.950 -47:08:43.45  AT 2026xad  2026-06-19.54 20.42
00:02:18.948 +29:04:39.95  AT 2026xac  2026-07-29.51 19.76
21:35:48.554 -26:40:57.79  AT 2026xab  2026-06-16.55 20.65
20:00:04.333 -34:58:06.08  AT 2026xaa  2026-06-16.49 20.62
14:56:06.142 +19:59:52.91  AT 2026wzz  2026-04-20.54 21.17
15:43:22.735 -12:32:40.12  AT 2026wzy  2026-01-29.65 20.48
13:01:31.563 -05:17:30.42  AT 2026wzx  2026-01-20.63 21.3
09:35:39.129 +00:09:39.43  AT 2026wzw  2026-02-14.42 20.88
12:44:03.003 +34:52:48.24  AT 2026wzv  2026-06-15.27 20.69
23:42:29.807 -07:26:38.21  AT 2026wzu  2026-07-25.58 21.31
00:32:59.618 -20:06:29.77  AT 2026wzt  2026-07-20.58 20.4
15:05:16.769 +01:50:59.23  AT 2026wzs  2026-05-14.37 21.11
12:05:52.531 -28:18:31.37  AT 2026wzr  2026-04-21.37 20.31
03:21:56.606 -28:39:02.78  AT 2026wzq  2026-01-09.24 20.45
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 19 02:19 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Wed Aug 19 02:18:41 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 4 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 6s (0.10 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 40s (0.67 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 3s (0.05 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 1s (0.02 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 25s (0.42 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 12s (0.20 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 87s (1.45 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 37 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 5 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 5 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 6 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 62s (1.03 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 2s (0.03 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 41s (0.68 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 5s (0.08 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 6s (0.10 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 5s (0.08 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 118s (1.97 min)
FIELD_Cam-05-Q1b1x1: 226s (3.77 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 242s (4.03 min)
Finished: Wed Aug 19 02:22:43 CDT 2026