This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461270.9447,10.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260818.4447 10.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 13.73 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6
192.76348 15.16071 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.779 Nina 1 1 1 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 12.88 07:14:31.89 +22:23:37.6
195.05845 14.86203 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 0 -1 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:31.89 +22:23:37.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:31.89 +22:23:37.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 12.98 07:29:38.85 +24:54:59.3
194.02514 19.02924 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 7.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona 1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:38.85 +24:54:59.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:38.85 +24:54:59.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,12.98,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 12.98CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 13.36 07:27:58.66 +26:27:26.4
192.36221 19.24761 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.423 Diotima 1 -0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:58.66 +26:27:26.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:58.66 +26:27:26.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,13.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 13.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 13.99 06:55:14.33 +24:02:28.8
191.65054 11.49280 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.3" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.579 Sidonia 1 0 1 14.2 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:14.33 +24:02:28.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:14.33 +24:02:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,13.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 13.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 13.88 07:13:10.09 +19:12:30.1
197.92350 13.27286 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.4" and 6.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.305 Gordonia 0 0 1 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:10.09 +19:12:30.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:10.09 +19:12:30.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,13.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 13.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 13.95 07:15:28.37 +20:08:52.4
197.27156 14.15371 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.50 Virginia 0 -1 1 14.5 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:28.37 +20:08:52.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:28.37 +20:08:52.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,13.95,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 13.95CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4447 2461270.9447 12.96 07:13:01.42 +17:36:41.8
199.39813 12.57638 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 7.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 1 -1 2 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.42 +17:36:41.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:01.42 +17:36:41.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9447,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4447 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
U Gem,2461270.9447,10.11,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
U Gem 20260818.4447 10.11CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461270.94503848 18.08.2026 10:40:41.325 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 14
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 22131
Objects passed selection criteria: 22045
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16956.8
Average stars matched: 16549.8 (97.5998 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 250304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:47:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461270.94503848 18.08.2026 10:40:41.325 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 182
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 49 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 140358
Objects passed selection criteria: 139947
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110605
Average stars matched: 106575 (96.3564 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 605276 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 05:49:22 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.94431343
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01170 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dVS6FxCzsO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.S7K9q4GbZV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits &> /tmp/tmp.8ZZJ8GCmEO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C0OVs16FgR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.929600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.929600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.64
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 13 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dVS6FxCzsO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=1, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 21361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4812 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23656 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4811 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4811 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.458 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.409 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=904 n_q2=1356 n_q3=1059 n_q4=1492 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.S7K9q4GbZV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=1, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 21095 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4806 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4805 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5285)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.426 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.544 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.377 n_q1=895 n_q2=1351 n_q3=1061 n_q4=1499 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.8ZZJ8GCmEO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=652, bad_region=0, passed=10655
Got 10655 stars (including 9992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10655 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4850 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4811 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4811 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4813 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10649 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4813 stars left (next iteration limit 5292)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=7.087 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=19.388 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.537 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.944 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4813 robust_rms=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.489 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4813 robust_rms_before=1.557 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.402 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.402 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.543 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.489
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.543 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits N_match=4813 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.499 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.401 n_q1=1600 n_q2=842 n_q3=1544 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.245
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C0OVs16FgR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=711, bad_region=2, passed=10690
Got 10690 stars (including 9970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10690 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4807 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4846 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4807 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4806 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10688 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4806 stars left (next iteration limit 5286)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=6.941 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=21.350 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.508 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.893 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4806 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.504 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4806 robust_rms_before=1.423 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.492 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.504
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.492 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits N_match=4806 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.381 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.477 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.376 n_q1=1597 n_q2=853 n_q3=1529 n_q4=827 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.250
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.387 worst_q_ratio=1.183
ref2=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.426 worst_q_ratio=1.279
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits sigma_overall=0.401 worst_q_ratio=1.245
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits sigma_overall=0.381 worst_q_ratio=1.250
reference average sigma_overall=0.4065 worst_q_ratio=1.231
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4811 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476_astrometric_residuals.png (4813 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477_astrometric_residuals.png (4806 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:43.0: 10.77 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: 11.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: 10.83 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.6: 11.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: 10.82 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:43.0: 10.78 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.39 +22:51:40.1: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.1: 10.03 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.77 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.80 +22:47:45.1: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1045 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.39 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.2434 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:50.62 +20:58:43.0: ref_mag=10.77 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.9461 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.03 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.82 +22:54:43.1: ref_mag=10.03 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.5557 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.6: 11.52 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.53 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:24.09 +22:16:49.6: ref_mag=11.53 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.7609 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31370_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31370_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31391_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31414_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 31419_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31467_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31484_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.04 +20:02:07.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31485_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31514_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31534_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.43 +24:13:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31535_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.56 +22:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 31565_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 20555_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:40.99 +17:29:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Image size: 945.3'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Image size: 945.1'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0472 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:08.432 +21:56:41.96
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:08.770 +21:57:23.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01170 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uo3uvQces6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tSzia3hjp8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f8KBbweFAp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fqs3T2jqi1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.796750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.796750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.35
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.45
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 177 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.4 mag. Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.uo3uvQces6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=46, blended=17705, bad_region=3, passed=151450
Got 151450 stars (including 133484 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151450 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4826 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 151450 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=951 n_q2=1322 n_q3=1097 n_q4=1434 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.231
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tSzia3hjp8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=67, blended=17785, bad_region=5, passed=153538
Got 153538 stars (including 135488 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153538 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4823 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 153538 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.508 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.411 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.358 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.371 n_q1=940 n_q2=1323 n_q3=1093 n_q4=1447 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.259
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f8KBbweFAp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=5, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=3786, bad_region=25, passed=69190
Got 69190 stars (including 65282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69190 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013129 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010503 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4808 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4808 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69173 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4839 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4809 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69174 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4809 stars left (next iteration limit 5288)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=7.320 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=16.945 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.535 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.936 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4809 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4809 robust_rms_before=1.565 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.390 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.523 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.486
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.523 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits N_match=4809 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.339 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1569 n_q2=841 n_q3=1541 n_q4=858 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.272
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fqs3T2jqi1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=4099, bad_region=28, passed=71214
Got 71214 stars (including 66963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 71214 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013126 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010501 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 71211 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=7.200 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=17.950 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.517 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.904 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4803 robust_rms=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.510 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4803 robust_rms_before=1.429 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.373 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.399 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.500 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.510
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.500 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.479 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1557 n_q2=863 n_q3=1524 n_q4=859 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-39-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0476.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_054155_TTUQ1b1x1_324728_VEYR3ZGP/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:06.24 +24:26:56.4: 13.56 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:35:07.97 +26:42:18.5: 13.98 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6: 15.67 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.41 +21:34:52.0: 13.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:16.5: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:24.41 +21:34:52.0: 13.35 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:06.24 +24:26:56.4: 13.65 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:35:07.97 +26:42:18.5: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6: 15.39 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.01 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:24.41 +21:34:52.0: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2665 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.50 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:06.24 +24:26:56.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6519 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:35:07.97 +26:42:18.5: ref_mag=14.01 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7144 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:11:52.59 +24:32:45.6: ref_mag=15.50 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.7233 delta=1.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.4: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:16.5: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:21:28.54 +23:40:16.5: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2631 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: 13.26 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.4: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.94 +20:54:37.7: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1616 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:56:48.77 +21:43:42.4: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3189 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:01.20 +19:41:48.4: 12.52 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:01.20 +19:41:48.4: 12.51 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.52 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:01.20 +19:41:48.4: ref_mag=12.52 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4814 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.2: 10.72 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:31.3: 12.18 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.87 +22:54:53.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.0: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.2: 10.74 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:31.3: 12.22 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.73 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.83 +22:50:51.2: ref_mag=10.73 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=12.4846 delta=-1.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.20 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:57:57.53 +22:31:31.3: ref_mag=12.20 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4188 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.0: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.08 +19:24:26.0: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4263 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:59:35.38 +25:22:47.0: 13.11 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:14:31.89 +22:23:37.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:01:37.34 +21:43:09.4: 13.09 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:59:35.38 +25:22:47.0: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:35.38 +25:22:47.0: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1003 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:14:31.89 +22:23:37.6: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:01:37.34 +21:43:09.4: 13.08 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.09 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:01:37.34 +21:43:09.4: ref_mag=13.09 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0296 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:29:38.85 +24:54:59.3: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:30.13 +26:40:19.1: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:24.65 +22:49:53.8: 12.74 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:29:38.85 +24:54:59.3: 16.10 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:30.13 +26:40:19.1: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:30.13 +26:40:19.1: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4991 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:24.65 +22:49:53.8: 12.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.74 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:24.65 +22:49:53.8: ref_mag=12.74 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.2388 delta=-0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:52.23 +23:32:21.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:53:42.46 +20:44:43.8: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:42.46 +20:44:43.8: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:53:52.23 +23:32:21.1: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:42.46 +20:44:43.8: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3897 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:53:52.23 +23:32:21.1: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4846 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:58.66 +26:27:26.4: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:58.66 +26:27:26.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:51:27.19 +20:50:35.5: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:01.01 +20:13:25.6: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.9: 12.85 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:51:27.19 +20:50:35.5: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:01.01 +20:13:25.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.41 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:51:27.19 +20:50:35.5: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4851 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:01.01 +20:13:25.6: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2716 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.9: 12.94 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.57 +22:49:42.9: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.4395 delta=-0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: 13.67 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: 13.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.30 +22:51:11.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.5299 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:00:13.24 +25:45:28.0: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:10:00.14 +23:41:58.3: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:46.13 +22:54:26.6: 11.33 +/- 0.34 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:00:13.24 +25:45:28.0: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:10:00.14 +23:41:58.3: 14.09 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:00:13.24 +25:45:28.0: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7290 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:10:00.14 +23:41:58.3: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.7286 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 06:55:14.33 +24:02:28.8: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:46.13 +22:54:26.6: 11.33 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:18:25.98 +21:22:41.9: 14.12 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 06:55:14.33 +24:02:28.8: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:16:43.25 +23:28:22.7: 14.21 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.33 +/- 0.23
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:46.13 +22:54:26.6: ref_mag=11.33 +/- 0.23 new_mean_mag=13.7202 delta=-2.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:16:43.25 +23:28:22.7: 14.30 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:18:25.98 +21:22:41.9: 14.07 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:18:25.98 +21:22:41.9: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7869 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:16:43.25 +23:28:22.7: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8383 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:41.40 +22:55:54.6: 13.57 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:41.40 +22:55:54.6: 13.67 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:41.40 +22:55:54.6: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.8804 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:10.09 +19:12:30.1: 16.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:38.12 +22:55:41.4: 12.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.75 +22:47:37.9: 13.08 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:00.71 +23:01:53.6: 13.02 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:10.09 +19:12:30.1: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:38.12 +22:55:41.4: 12.11 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.75 +22:47:37.9: 13.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:00.71 +23:01:53.6: 12.96 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:00.71 +23:01:53.6: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.1554 delta=-1.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:05.21 +22:57:29.0: 9.25 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:15:28.37 +20:08:52.4: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:05.21 +22:57:29.0: 9.26 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:15:28.37 +20:08:52.4: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:13:01.42 +17:36:41.8: 15.90 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:13:01.42 +17:36:41.8: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177043.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177049.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out177064.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out112860.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out175444.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176206.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176400.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176560.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out176913.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177022.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out177071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 175444_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175445_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.30 +19:58:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175448_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175452_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:40:39.20 +18:49:38.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:00.38 +23:33:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175459_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:32.42 +18:21:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175460_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:32.92 +22:54:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175463_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175466_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.26 +18:47:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175468_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.69 +18:14:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175469_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175470_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:52:56.09 +18:43:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175471_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:25.12 +20:16:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:42.84 +18:23:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175476_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:44.55 +20:07:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175477_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175479_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:34.76 +20:54:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175480_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175482_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:51.44 +17:19:47.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175483_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:51.40 +18:23:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175486_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:31.04 +20:09:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:08.27 +18:48:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.84 +26:11:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175491_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:14.93 +18:59:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175494_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:28.54 +21:02:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175496_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:12.79 +21:35:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175497_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:44.25 +19:19:32.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175498_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:06.90 +20:04:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175500_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:11.50 +22:11:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175501_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:17.19 +19:25:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175504_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.25 +22:46:53.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175506_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:27.78 +19:32:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175507_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.14 +23:55:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175508_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:38.68 +19:12:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.92 +22:56:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175670_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175670_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.57 +22:51:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175711_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175711_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:49.33 +19:28:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175717_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175736_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175736_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.54 +22:52:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175740_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175740_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:19.22 +24:07:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175770_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:25.16 +22:38:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175842_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:40.95 +19:13:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175843_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175843_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.37 +22:56:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175859_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:57.75 +25:46:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175871_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175871_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:52.11 +26:07:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175892_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175954_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175966_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175966_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:37.36 +26:03:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175967_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175967_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.30 +23:37:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175976_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 175976_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:48.82 +19:51:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176005_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.93 +23:02:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176010_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.34 +25:56:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:17.88 +24:27:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176023_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:53.90 +20:58:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176029_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:43:14.52 +22:23:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176030_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176030_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:33.09 +22:42:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176037_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:36:01.17 +26:51:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176060_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176076_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.24 +24:16:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176077_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:02.99 +23:25:47.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176079_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176079_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:49.58 +25:29:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176084_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176084_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:08.02 +21:35:22.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176104_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:19.04 +25:55:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176115_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:37.03 +17:45:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176147_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176147_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.47 +21:18:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176150_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.15 +22:43:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176157_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.12 +22:10:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176175_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.80 +18:51:17.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176182_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176182_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.71 +24:40:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176185_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176185_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:00:45.93 +23:26:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176204_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 176206_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176208_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176232_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.37 +21:47:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176266_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.45 +20:30:18.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176267_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.76 +23:56:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176270_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176270_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:54.05 +20:45:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176278_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176278_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:19.25 +22:04:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176295_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:45.79 +25:33:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176304_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.82 +22:49:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176321_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176321_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.82 +23:41:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176335_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176335_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.12 +22:57:32.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176343_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:00.30 +20:48:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176369_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.13 +22:52:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176376_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:46.09 +19:29:52.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176392_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176400_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 176400_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176403_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176403_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176418_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.12 +24:39:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176423_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:23.32 +18:07:03.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176431_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:54:21.52 +23:00:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176439_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:49.22 +25:18:25.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176443_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:48.51 +21:56:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176454_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:56:55.44 +20:35:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176473_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176488_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176495_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176499_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:33.08 +23:13:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176509_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.54 +19:28:25.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176515_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:41.48 +19:34:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176520_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:20.12 +24:08:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176522_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.10 +22:50:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176525_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.31 +24:32:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176531_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:38:17.08 +24:22:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176536_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.03 +20:06:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176538_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.24 +23:05:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176545_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.38 +21:31:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176554_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:49.69 +26:19:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176558_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:03:59.81 +25:32:35.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176560_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 176560_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176572_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.49 +24:54:15.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176583_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:48.08 +21:45:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176584_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176584_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:31.14 +19:14:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176585_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.65 +20:31:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176594_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176594_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:28.50 +25:50:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176600_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176600_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.44 +20:05:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176603_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176623_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176636_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176636_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:45:03.49 +18:03:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176647_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.54 +20:26:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176663_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.18 +22:57:51.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176664_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176664_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.18 +22:51:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176671_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:55.07 +24:28:12.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176675_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.69 +21:27:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176679_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:02:45.48 +21:44:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176689_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:26.30 +21:45:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176721_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:57.92 +26:41:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176733_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176746_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:01.09 +23:54:48.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176769_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:58.86 +24:10:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176771_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:12:15.58 +25:49:11.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176774_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:26.37 +21:00:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176778_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:28.74 +19:21:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176785_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:06.80 +21:00:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176790_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176790_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:22.61 +20:00:48.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176793_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:18.93 +22:52:12.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176797_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:01:42.03 +18:24:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176808_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176808_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:03.03 +20:26:57.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176809_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.28 +22:57:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176817_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176817_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176830_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176830_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:41.08 +22:08:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176839_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176847_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176847_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:26.80 +19:37:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176864_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.74 +19:56:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176869_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176906_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176906_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:28.54 +23:06:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 176913_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176918_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:11:39.88 +20:41:33.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176929_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176943_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176943_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176944_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.74 +22:50:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176946_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176946_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.65 +20:16:01.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176972_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 176972_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.68 +22:51:02.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177002_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:29.70 +22:53:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177003_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:43.77 +24:30:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177006_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:58.56 +23:31:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 177022_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177043_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.75 +22:47:37.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.442 3368228355568248704 106.50303928105 +22.79346843642 14.1144 13.6875 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.442#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177045_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:34.97 +22:52:01.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177049_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177049_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:38.12 +22:55:41.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.499 3368420636961607552 106.40889011415 +22.92775347786 14.0563 13.6357 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.499#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177053_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177053_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177057_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.67 +23:02:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 177064_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:05.21 +22:57:29.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.240 3368234986998044800 106.52169056875 +22.95799094722 14.1148 13.5974 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.240#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177071_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 177071_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 05956_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:12.41 +26:47:36.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.08 +25:59:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 163920_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.48 +24:13:19.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 112860_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 112860_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 66489_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:21.37 +18:06:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 100568_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:31.09 +20:02:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477
The candidate 111481_fd_Gem-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-40-41_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0477 did not pass the final checks
