FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last  image: 2461270.93022635 18.08.2026 10:19:21.557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.92
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  4399
Objects passed selection criteria:  4397
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 4111.75
Average stars matched: 4017.5 (97.7078 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230912 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 05:21:08 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last  image: 2461270.93022635 18.08.2026 10:19:21.557   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 149
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  23043
Objects passed selection criteria:  22975
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 21521
Average stars matched: 20938.8 (97.2945 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   248024 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 05:21:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-10-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 306414 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 306414 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits_preview.png'

Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits


renamed 'Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits_preview.png'

Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1455.4574
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 478.4221
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1452.7385
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 478.5435
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.24972
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T05:18:38.6026458' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T10:18:38.6026458' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4296134491 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T10:18:48.5075569' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61270.4297280903 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     13.3300676991472 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9997998276957 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.0933333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     187.163055555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.61836657576557 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29543 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29543 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 48.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 21.7 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 49.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =               5.0004 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits :)

Spent 0.508135 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T05:19:21.5575089' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T10:19:21.5575089' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4301106133 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T10:19:31.4593565' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =       61270.43022522 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     13.3300676523772 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9997998322308 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.0738888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     187.383888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.61906414842632 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29543 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29543 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.1 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               905.01 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.3 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 34.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             7.200576 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits :)

Spent 0.497661 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/d_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits



fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.92972919
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0099 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00372 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YMnODP2zJV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QjNeKbtkAj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RgQqr6WkVO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gQlGmmQq8a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886450
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886450
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.92
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.97

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
 2.6 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.0 mag.  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 14.8 mag.  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.8 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.YMnODP2zJV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=0, passed=4470
Got 4470 stars (including 4148 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4067 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4069 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4067 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4470 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4067 stars left (next iteration limit 4473)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4067 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.257 n_q1=970 n_q2=1070 n_q3=960 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.242
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QjNeKbtkAj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=1, passed=4144
Got 4144 stars (including 3880 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3804 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3800 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3805 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4144 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 3803 stars left (next iteration limit 4180)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=3803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.267 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.279 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=909 n_q2=1014 n_q3=908 n_q4=972 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.079
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RgQqr6WkVO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=282, bad_region=0, passed=4013
Got 4013 stars (including 3728 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4013 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3654 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3651 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3654 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3651 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4013 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 3651 stars left (next iteration limit 4016)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3651 robust_rms=11.011 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.564 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3651 robust_rms=0.437 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.450 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3651 robust_rms=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.303 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3651 robust_rms_before=1.136 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.305 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.298 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.312 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.303
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.312 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=3651 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.312 n_q1=943 n_q2=922 n_q3=899 n_q4=887 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.088
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gQlGmmQq8a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=246, bad_region=0, passed=3949
Got 3949 stars (including 3696 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3949 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3631 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3629 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 390 (Dec -23.5 to -12.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3631 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3629 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3949 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 3629 stars left (next iteration limit 3991)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3629 robust_rms=10.957 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.425 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3629 robust_rms=0.460 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.472 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3629 robust_rms=0.319 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3629 robust_rms_before=1.134 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.328 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.319 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.344 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.344 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=3629 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=934 n_q2=927 n_q3=888 n_q4=880 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.083
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.276 worst_q_ratio=1.242
ref2=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.289 worst_q_ratio=1.079
new1=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits sigma_overall=0.310 worst_q_ratio=1.088
new2=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits sigma_overall=0.345 worst_q_ratio=1.083
reference average sigma_overall=0.2825 worst_q_ratio=1.1605
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (4067 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (3803 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456_astrometric_residuals.png (3651 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457_astrometric_residuals.png (3629 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.5:  11.95 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:47.1:  12.06 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:46.22 -14:44:04.6:  12.09 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6:  12.20 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6:  12.11 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:53:46.22 -14:44:04.6:  12.00 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.5:  11.94 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:47.1:  12.02 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.16 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.6: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0271 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:46.22 -14:44:04.6: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9992 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.92 -16:02:34.5: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9804 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:17.33 -16:28:47.1: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0082 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20113_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20113_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    12.00    00:53:46.23 -14:44:04.7   4849 1228   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.00    00:53:46.22 -14:44:04.5   4851 1227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20272_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20272_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    11.97    00:58:18.93 -16:02:34.2   4143 1976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.99    00:58:18.91 -16:02:34.8   4145 1975   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20276_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20276_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    12.00    00:51:17.33 -16:28:46.8   5140 2301   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.01    00:51:17.33 -16:28:47.4   5142 2300   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20278_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 20278_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    12.03    01:20:10.94 -15:47:41.4   0964 1683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.03    01:20:10.93 -15:47:41.7   0966 1682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0105 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0099 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:53:19.502 -18:00:01.12
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:20.271 -18:00:08.79
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00372 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ARzVCj9Xfb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NnynWTt3wx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9HKci54gXr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Piyq0PfrVZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.67
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.11

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.11

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.8)
Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 131 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
 2.4 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 14.9 mag.  Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
 14.7 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.7 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.ARzVCj9Xfb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=893, bad_region=1, passed=24280
Got 24280 stars (including 23344 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24280 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4897 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4897 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24280 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4897 stars left (next iteration limit 5386)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4897 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.282 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1223 n_q2=1268 n_q3=1181 n_q4=1225 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.234
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NnynWTt3wx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=669, bad_region=24, passed=21674
Got 21674 stars (including 20941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21674 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4892 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4892 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4894 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 21674 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5381)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1274 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1177 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.096
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9HKci54gXr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=874, bad_region=33, passed=20424
Got 20424 stars (including 19483 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20424 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4885 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4888 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4885 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20424 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 4885 stars left (next iteration limit 5373)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=10.459 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.143 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.450 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4885 robust_rms=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.325 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4885 robust_rms_before=1.147 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.317 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.312 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.328 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.325
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.328 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits N_match=4885 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.315 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.321 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.317 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1251 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1192 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.018
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Piyq0PfrVZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=887, bad_region=30, passed=20631
Got 20631 stars (including 19669 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4882 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 4882 stars left (next iteration limit 5370)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=10.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.942 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.470 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.487 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4882 robust_rms=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.332 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4882 robust_rms_before=1.150 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.333 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.330 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.340 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.332
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.340 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits N_match=4882 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.347 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1243 n_q2=1263 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1189 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.056
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:12:45.99 -14:19:21.9:  14.30 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:29:05.70 -18:17:24.6:  12.89 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:23:43.50 -15:17:10.9:  13.26 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:26:36.12 -19:23:43.3:  12.49 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:53:05.60 -22:28:40.5:  14.52 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:23:43.50 -15:17:10.9:  13.20 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:26:36.12 -19:23:43.3:  12.63 +/- 0.03  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:12:45.99 -14:19:21.9:  14.36 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:53:05.60 -22:28:40.5:  14.51 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:29:05.70 -18:17:24.6:  12.91 +/- 0.04  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.54 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:23:43.50 -15:17:10.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5211 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.32 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.90 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:53:05.60 -22:28:40.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4750 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.12 -19:23:43.3: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6835 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:12:45.99 -14:19:21.9: ref_mag=14.32 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2029 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:05.70 -18:17:24.6: ref_mag=12.90 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0993 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:31:05.66 -18:34:24.0:  14.57 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:55.30 -21:19:15.8:  14.99 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:03.97 -21:26:55.5:  14.54 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:24:31.90 -13:57:20.0:  15.09 +/- 0.26  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:31:05.66 -18:34:24.0:  14.69 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.61 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:31:05.66 -18:34:24.0: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3398 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:24:16.32 -14:38:22.7:  14.76 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:55.30 -21:19:15.8:  14.78 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:55.30 -21:19:15.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3891 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:25:10.99 -14:06:32.0:  14.53 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:03.97 -21:26:55.5:  14.55 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:03.97 -21:26:55.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3768 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:22:25.73 -19:58:20.8:  14.89 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:24:31.90 -13:57:20.0:  15.04 +/- 0.28  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:34:31.83 -22:31:42.8:  14.93 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.07 +/- 0.19
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:24:31.90 -13:57:20.0: ref_mag=15.07 +/- 0.19 new_mean_mag=14.4055 delta=0.66 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:24:16.32 -14:38:22.7:  14.63 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.70 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:24:16.32 -14:38:22.7: ref_mag=14.70 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3444 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:01.45 -21:53:57.1:  14.70 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:25:10.99 -14:06:32.0:  14.67 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.58 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:10.99 -14:06:32.0: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5227 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:22:25.73 -19:58:20.8:  15.14 +/- 0.34  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.96 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:22:25.73 -19:58:20.8: ref_mag=14.96 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.3218 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.24 -19:45:40.3:  14.78 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:34:31.83 -22:31:42.8:  14.81 +/- 0.23  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.88 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:31.83 -22:31:42.8: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.3364 delta=0.54 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:01.45 -21:53:57.1:  14.83 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.75 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:01.45 -21:53:57.1: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5077 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:33:10.75 -19:59:02.0:  14.87 +/- 0.19  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:26.81 -15:53:55.3:  15.12 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:59.6:  14.53 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.24 -19:45:40.3:  14.68 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.24 -19:45:40.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4803 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:33:10.75 -19:59:02.0:  14.84 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:26.81 -15:53:55.3:  15.03 +/- 0.22  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.86 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:33:10.75 -19:59:02.0: ref_mag=14.86 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5925 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.08 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:26.81 -15:53:55.3: ref_mag=15.08 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.5935 delta=0.49 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:59.6:  14.66 +/- 0.20  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.57 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:30.87 -19:20:59.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5187 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.51    00:53:05.56 -22:28:40.9   4651 5892   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.44    00:53:05.63 -22:28:40.2   4653 5891   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30812_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30812_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.20    01:12:46.03 -14:19:20.1   2084 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.21    01:12:45.95 -14:19:23.7   2086 0830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30815_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30815_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    13.54    00:23:43.48 -15:17:11.1   9211 1908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.51    00:23:43.51 -15:17:10.7   9212 1907   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30816_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30816_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    13.13    00:29:05.65 -18:17:24.1   8244 3646   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.08    00:29:05.75 -18:17:25.1   8246 3645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30818_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30818_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    12.66    00:26:36.14 -19:23:43.3   8538 4348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.71    00:26:36.10 -19:23:43.4   8540 4347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30883_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30883_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    10.81    01:00:20.96 -19:56:00.7   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30912_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30912_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.51    01:19:27.87 -16:21:16.6   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30921_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30921_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.79    01:13:08.03 -14:36:47.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30922_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30922_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.54    01:04:46.56 -20:27:02.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30958_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30958_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.76    00:28:04.95 -15:05:18.1   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30979_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 30979_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    11.92    00:47:32.27 -15:26:02.3   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31016_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31016_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.26    00:54:36.12 -12:54:07.9   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31021_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31021_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.27    01:18:39.11 -15:32:31.7   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31033_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31033_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.28    01:23:42.38 -13:15:59.2   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31080_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31080_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.65    01:02:11.67 -14:05:32.5   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31124_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31124_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.72    01:20:12.51 -17:09:18.4   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31134_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31134_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.63    00:54:04.16 -23:04:44.6   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31152_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31152_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.04    01:23:59.94 -20:25:19.6   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31154_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31154_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.83    00:45:03.24 -17:15:31.4   6005 2830   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31160_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31160_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.84    00:50:58.07 -20:50:32.8   5014 4923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31164_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31164_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.17    01:24:35.08 -20:53:30.6   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31170_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31170_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.88    00:30:54.13 -14:44:02.7   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31176_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31176_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.92    01:20:51.31 -14:40:28.4   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31178_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31178_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.95    00:59:32.76 -21:03:43.8   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31179_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31179_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    12.99    00:23:08.14 -17:53:54.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31183_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31183_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.11    01:20:00.80 -13:21:59.5   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31187_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31187_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.26    01:25:12.44 -20:04:29.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31202_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31202_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.04    01:15:11.01 -14:40:12.4   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31234_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31234_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.08    01:25:27.80 -15:27:40.0   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31242_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31242_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.25    01:12:42.11 -17:48:45.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31245_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31245_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.41    01:05:16.52 -14:04:56.8   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31247_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31247_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.19    01:20:48.47 -21:59:31.8   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31249_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31249_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.28    01:24:43.92 -16:36:48.8   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31255_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31255_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.29    01:24:03.46 -19:14:13.9   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31256_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31256_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.33    00:48:44.03 -15:29:55.3   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31264_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31264_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.18    01:17:00.05 -17:38:17.8   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31278_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31278_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.34    00:35:50.79 -14:57:09.4   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31283_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31283_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.34    01:19:08.07 -16:44:05.0   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31290_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31290_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.64    00:31:39.28 -15:08:43.2   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31300_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31300_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.29    00:22:38.88 -22:11:17.2   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31304_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31304_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.34    01:21:30.28 -18:25:25.1   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31307_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31307_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.23    01:24:04.39 -22:19:04.6   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31308_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31308_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.27    00:23:47.50 -15:57:20.2   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31312_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31312_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.38    01:14:03.87 -13:26:37.4   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31314_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31314_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.57    01:25:11.69 -18:29:20.5   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31320_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31320_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.38    00:52:55.24 -15:10:52.9   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31330_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31330_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.41    00:23:03.55 -18:53:57.4   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31343_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31343_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.64    01:24:47.27 -15:14:41.8   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31347_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31347_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.35    00:48:23.89 -21:37:43.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31349_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31349_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.56    00:23:24.52 -17:38:55.1   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31354_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31354_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.55    00:48:28.64 -15:20:11.8   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31358_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31358_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.54    00:27:39.18 -21:53:03.0   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31364_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31364_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.52    00:48:58.84 -21:52:54.5   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31375_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31375_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.39    00:48:34.82 -13:04:34.7   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31380_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31380_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.60    01:21:57.73 -15:17:04.5   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31390_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31390_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.73    01:13:51.90 -21:05:34.7   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31396_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31396_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.45    00:29:13.98 -19:20:43.9   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31397_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31397_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.62    00:44:53.00 -20:37:14.3   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31423_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31423_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.49    01:20:51.07 -15:11:07.4   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31426_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31426_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.66    00:39:36.62 -16:54:47.8   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31429_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31429_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.67    00:33:58.84 -15:12:30.1   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31438_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31438_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.63    01:03:52.06 -22:11:17.5   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31466_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31466_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.57    00:30:19.10 -14:15:09.8   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31471_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31471_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.06    00:26:38.74 -13:15:16.6   8907 0633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31480_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31480_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.77    00:29:09.70 -14:04:53.4   8483 1103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31501_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31501_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.72    01:18:52.70 -14:48:01.0   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31503_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31503_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.57    00:20:59.11 -21:57:36.3   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31521_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31521_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.83    00:37:06.51 -14:21:05.3   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31532_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31532_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.85    00:29:24.20 -18:48:55.0   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31533_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31533_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.04    00:59:50.81 -17:09:53.4   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31552_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31552_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.94    00:34:15.97 -13:53:57.2   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31571_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31571_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.09    01:20:57.00 -22:23:07.8   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31577_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31577_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.06    01:03:48.11 -16:21:49.1   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31578_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31578_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.86    01:25:40.75 -16:20:54.1   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31599_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31599_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.79    00:24:31.95 -18:30:33.4   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31601_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31601_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.90    01:02:45.45 -22:35:08.0   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31604_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31604_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.00    01:12:05.73 -19:00:19.4   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31610_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31610_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.14    00:28:55.18 -18:56:48.0   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31612_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31612_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.93    00:28:26.05 -22:14:23.3   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31624_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31624_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.87    01:02:28.34 -13:13:00.3   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31627_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31627_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.22    01:04:48.93 -16:12:11.3   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31633_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31633_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.91    00:30:04.99 -18:59:49.1   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31635_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31635_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.08    00:28:47.39 -21:12:39.2   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31639_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31639_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.99    00:21:04.15 -20:19:09.2   9278 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31648_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31648_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.31    01:16:05.73 -20:24:29.1   1476 4494   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31651_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31651_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.96    01:03:03.94 -18:55:49.1   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31657_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31657_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.30    01:11:17.02 -15:28:55.1   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31659_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31659_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.89    01:06:02.33 -23:00:59.3   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31661_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31661_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.92    01:15:12.62 -22:25:58.0   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31662_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31662_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.19    00:28:36.60 -13:35:38.1   8594 0814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31677_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31677_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.08    00:49:13.65 -17:48:11.4   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31685_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31685_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.32    00:42:01.39 -14:35:50.2   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31686_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31686_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.26    01:08:40.23 -15:36:57.3   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31690_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31690_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.25    00:33:58.57 -19:31:39.6   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31699_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31699_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.16    00:31:28.29 -18:54:20.6   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31706_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31706_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.12    01:11:47.01 -20:06:02.8   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31709_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31709_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.05    01:19:26.36 -13:47:40.8   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31713_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31713_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.35    00:58:55.36 -21:19:15.1   3878 5145   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.46    00:58:55.25 -21:19:16.5   3880 5144   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31714_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31714_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.42    01:12:28.98 -21:26:09.6   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31721_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31721_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.28    00:31:05.72 -18:34:24.3   7940 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.43    00:31:05.60 -18:34:23.6   7942 3788   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31729_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31729_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.24    00:57:02.65 -14:19:08.7   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31730_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31730_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.45    00:29:09.07 -13:47:22.6   8502 0926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31733_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31733_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.37    00:22:58.16 -16:12:25.3   9265 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31734_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31734_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    13.91    00:41:33.24 -22:45:25.5   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31737_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31737_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.38    00:33:03.98 -21:26:55.4   7501 5496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.38    00:33:03.95 -21:26:55.7   7503 5495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31740_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31740_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.51    00:36:55.14 -19:53:58.1   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31745_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31745_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.52    00:49:05.46 -19:44:48.0   5323 4282   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31746_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31746_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.21    01:23:42.59 -16:40:34.3   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31750_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31750_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.38    00:27:24.64 -13:04:37.0   8804 0515   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31753_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31753_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.38    00:42:55.39 -13:51:01.1   6471 0801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31759_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31759_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.42    01:24:32.10 -13:57:20.1   0343 0540   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.40    01:24:31.70 -13:57:20.0   0346 0539   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31767_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31767_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.79    01:02:45.12 -14:02:30.5   3564 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31768_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31768_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.20    00:56:29.98 -19:17:33.6   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31769_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31769_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.33    00:24:16.29 -14:38:22.1   9171 1508   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.35    00:24:16.35 -14:38:23.2   9173 1507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31776_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31776_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.41    01:16:33.97 -14:49:24.4   1516 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31778_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31778_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.23    01:11:10.66 -20:53:28.1   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31784_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31784_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.52    00:25:11.01 -14:06:33.0   9069 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.52    00:25:10.96 -14:06:31.1   9071 1172   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31785_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31785_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.53    01:01:22.19 -13:19:06.7   3789 0305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31786_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31786_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.37    01:17:06.07 -19:04:56.1   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31788_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31788_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.37    00:22:25.70 -19:58:20.7   9103 4761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.29    00:22:25.75 -19:58:20.8   9104 4760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31797_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31797_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.33    00:34:31.76 -22:31:42.7   7238 6130   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.34    00:34:31.90 -22:31:42.9   7239 6129   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31799_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31799_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.32    00:43:02.78 -13:47:10.7   6456 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31805_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31805_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.48    00:37:01.55 -21:53:57.5   6920 5716   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.55    00:37:01.36 -21:53:56.7   6923 5715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31820_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31820_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.34    00:52:29.74 -19:01:10.9   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31828_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31828_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.49    00:43:42.16 -19:45:41.2   6082 4348   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.47    00:43:42.32 -19:45:39.4   6084 4347   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31836_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.52    00:33:51.90 -21:14:40.3   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31840_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31840_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.27    00:24:46.45 -17:25:31.0   8924 3185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31841_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31841_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.25    00:36:43.22 -17:15:31.8   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31845_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.56    00:33:10.80 -19:59:01.7   7564 4610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.63    00:33:10.70 -19:59:02.4   7566 4609   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31861_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31861_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.60    00:37:26.90 -15:53:54.7   7166 2099   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.59    00:37:26.71 -15:53:56.0   7168 2098   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31878_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457
The candidate 31878_fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.42973    2461270.92973    14.54    00:27:30.87 -19:21:00.2   8409 4308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-18-38_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0456.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.43023    2461270.93023    14.50    00:27:30.87 -19:20:59.0   8411 4306   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_052003_TTUQ1b1x1_2868451_Bj1SPYIK/fd_Cet-10-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_05-19-21_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0457.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-10-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.92972919 -observatory V36
09:13:42.45 +17:31:38.7 Mercury (-1.5mag)
12:37:33.02 -05:57:09.1 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:18:42.76 +23:42:03.1 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:03.20 +18:06:37.5 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:22.87 +03:06:04.1 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:44.50 +20:59:33.8 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:25.84 +00:08:21.5 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:11.42 -23:33:54.0 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:07:46.16 -18:22:43.0 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 18 05:21 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.92972919:
08:52:10.66 +18:06:04.5 Io (6.1mag)
08:52:04.71 +18:06:31.6 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:51.89 +18:07:28.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:51:44.48 +18:08:00.4 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:49:31.05 +18:12:15.6 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:52:01.38 +18:06:46.1 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:49:08.85 +18:08:49.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:56:11.78 +17:41:30.7 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:54:32.64 +18:19:14.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:34.52 +03:05:59.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:25.25 +03:06:05.9 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:54.77 +03:06:59.8 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:38.64 +03:05:44.8 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:32.42 +02:57:57.4 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 05:21 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.92972919:
19:49:27.21 -16:56:25.2 JWST
12:22:58.75 +49:48:59.3 Chandra
11:51:04.09 -61:19:57.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 05:21 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.92972919 -observatory V36
03:24:31.51 +18:10:17.1 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:59.59 -34:31:45.1 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:04.34 -69:18:47.8 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:18.77 +33:13:01.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:11:39.66 +41:21:03.3 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:30:04.14 +30:43:12.8 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:53:19.60 +26:21:27.4 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:03.07 +28:01:09.0 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:35:41.68 +05:18:26.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:36.23 -12:42:18.5 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:57:53.23 +64:41:13.2 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:39:05.18 -13:52:39.1 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:19:12.23 +31:49:12.0 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:50.73 +15:32:32.8 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:51:00.65 +43:27:17.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:55:22.29 +49:38:07.8 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:58.28 -12:53:56.7 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:02:28.08 +22:19:46.6 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:47:27.66 +20:13:57.0 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:04:39.69 +01:38:32.6 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:06:23.63 +76:45:31.0 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:49.32 +46:19:56.0 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:55:25.31 +09:34:05.0 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:08:46.12 -31:07:39.4 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:13.73 -04:03:15.5 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:28:27.37 +01:18:10.3 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:42.51 -05:53:44.2 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:18.15 +20:24:48.0 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:58.08 -24:37:44.2 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:09:27.18 +14:20:41.0 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:21:13.33 +26:11:36.1 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:35:46.38 +20:51:57.1 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:29:56.28 +28:57:53.3 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:42:31.80 +24:50:13.3 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:04:23.55 -14:08:37.0 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:51:17.89 +21:05:29.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:45:36.93 +18:20:48.2 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:57.99 +03:13:17.5 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:13:58.82 -18:46:38.7 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:50:46.15 +38:07:03.0 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:55:29.96 +35:28:33.0 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:00:20.50 +09:29:48.6 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:50.35 -10:50:48.6 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:14.40 -52:15:10.6 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:51:53.41 +29:19:39.4 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:35:50.55 +37:19:34.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:21.96 +01:59:57.2 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:10:10.46 +17:52:03.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 05:21 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 05:21 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 05:21 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:42:19.872 +11:23:33.24  AT 2026wyg  2026-07-27.36 20.362
22:23:18.161 -03:42:46.81  AT 2026wyf  2026-08-02.43 19.8981
23:01:54.687 -22:43:32.99  SN 2026wye  2026-08-02.38 19.1478
21:53:38.707 -07:26:43.02  AT 2026wyd  2026-08-02.36 19.6168
22:49:50.870 -46:36:08.90  AT 2026wyc  2026-08-03.35 17.2
21:36:41.623 +15:19:50.35  AT 2026wyb  2026-07-18.75 20.3
21:50:57.870 +21:21:44.04  AT 2026wya  2026-07-18.75 20.78
14:05:12.660 -00:47:11.60  AT 2026wxz  2026-08-01.61 20.44
04:58:05.316 +09:12:46.13  AT 2026wxy  2026-07-29.49 17.3027
19:55:18.916 +04:09:22.19  AT 2026wxx  2026-07-23.35 20.806
16:04:20.254 -02:01:58.81  AT 2026wxw  2026-07-05.20 20.2659
18:46:54.548 +16:48:18.74  AT 2026wxv  2026-06-24.31 19.7189
23:46:24.941 +43:49:43.79  AT 2026wxu  2026-07-03.43 19.6427
18:51:17.703 +37:10:07.59  AT 2026wxt  2026-07-04.30 20.0164
01:01:55.949 +41:41:30.57  AT 2026wxs  2026-07-01.41 19.2645
14:20:50.231 +61:16:12.38  AT 2026wxr  2026-07-12.22 19.9923
19:31:40.957 -26:44:38.76  AT 2026wxq  2026-07-24.28 19.6734
13:18:44.218 -20:30:38.57  AT 2026wxp  2026-04-17.43 20.98
12:55:43.929 +27:34:40.69  AT 2026wxo  2026-04-21.42 21.19
10:15:49.208 -16:52:33.53  AT 2026wxn  2026-04-22.26 20.69
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 05:21 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug 18 05:20:49 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 21s (0.35 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 34s (0.57 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 9s (0.15 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 0s (0.00 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 1s (0.02 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 2s (0.03 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 22s (0.37 min)
FIELD_Cet-10-Q1b1x1: 69s (1.15 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 73s (1.22 min)
Finished: Tue Aug 18 05:22:02 CDT 2026