FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 reference image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last  image: 2461270.91902080 18.08.2026 10:03:13.397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.90
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  3527
Objects passed selection criteria:  3525
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.8    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 3375.75
Average stars matched: 3280.75 (97.1858 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   230492 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 05:11:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
First image: 2461032.58217368 23.12.2025 01:58:09.806   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Last  image: 2461270.91902080 18.08.2026 10:03:13.397   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 138
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 7 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  17756
Objects passed selection criteria:  17715
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 16890.8
Average stars matched: 16587 (98.2017 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   243868 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 05:11:44 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-10-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-10-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310249 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310249 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits_preview.png'

Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits


renamed 'Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits_preview.png'

Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1164.6233
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.0200
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1419.3171
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 463.6055
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1418.1072
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 463.3497
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.21869
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     20.9400005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T05:02:36.4077199' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T10:02:36.4077199' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4184769327 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T10:02:46.3091084' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61270.4185915394 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     13.3300687208715 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9997997287945 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.3688888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     182.306388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60856474104001 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     20.9400005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     20.9400005340576 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits :)

Spent 0.492938 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     20.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T05:03:13.3972947' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T10:03:13.3972947' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4189050579 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T10:03:23.2992120' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61270.4190196642 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     13.3300686805285 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -17.9997997326934 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     38.3636111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     182.499166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.60875101863405 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =           33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-10'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 53 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     20.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     20.8299999237061 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.7 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 52.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.71 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 20.9 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 19.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits :)

Spent 0.479051 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/d_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits



fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.91859267
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0032 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00333 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SA7012Vjlg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WXVfwHEo9X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z9rDx08HyJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.uq22ea6XSX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.879650
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.879650
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.90
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.98

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  14.98

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9614 to 21.9299 deg, Dec -23.3166 to -12.4519 deg
Loaded 4156 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3116 out of 3229 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3229 out of 4470 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=5.9)
Read 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 5.0060 to 21.9301 deg, Dec -23.3178 to -12.4337 deg
Loaded 4161 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2348 out of 2396 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2396 out of 4144 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=5.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.0 mag.  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 14.8 mag.  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  11.9 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.SA7012Vjlg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=318, bad_region=1038, passed=4470
Got 4470 stars (including 3173 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4470 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3118 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.5)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3120 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3118 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3645 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 3118 stars left (next iteration limit 3429)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=3118 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.280 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.236 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=970 n_q2=588 n_q3=960 n_q4=600 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.228
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WXVfwHEo9X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=259, bad_region=948, passed=4144
Got 4144 stars (including 2986 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4144 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2935 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2932 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2932 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 2937 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 2935 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3382 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 2935 stars left (next iteration limit 3225)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=2935 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.275 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.227 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.260 n_q1=910 n_q2=554 n_q3=908 n_q4=563 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.141
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z9rDx08HyJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=235, bad_region=820, passed=4284
Got 4284 stars (including 3311 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4284 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3258 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3255 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3255 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3255 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3259 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3644 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 3257 stars left (next iteration limit 3580)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3257 robust_rms=6.626 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.688 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3257 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3257 robust_rms=0.345 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.411 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3257 robust_rms_before=1.044 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.422 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.422 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits N_match=3257 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1085 n_q2=595 n_q3=1035 n_q4=542 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.172
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.uq22ea6XSX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=250, bad_region=832, passed=4309
Got 4309 stars (including 3322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4309 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3261 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3257 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3257 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3263 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3260 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3260 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3666 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 3260 stars left (next iteration limit 3582)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3260 robust_rms=6.630 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3260 robust_rms=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3260 robust_rms=0.340 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.395 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3260 robust_rms_before=1.027 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.324 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.355 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.404 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.405
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.404 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits N_match=3260 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.322 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1077 n_q2=600 n_q3=1031 n_q4=552 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.164
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits sigma_overall=0.280 worst_q_ratio=1.228
ref2=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits sigma_overall=0.275 worst_q_ratio=1.141
new1=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits sigma_overall=0.326 worst_q_ratio=1.172
new2=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits sigma_overall=0.322 worst_q_ratio=1.164
reference average sigma_overall=0.2775 worst_q_ratio=1.1845
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017_astrometric_residuals.png (3118 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067_astrometric_residuals.png (2935 matched stars from wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486_astrometric_residuals.png (3257 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487_astrometric_residuals.png (3260 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.2:  11.95 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:07:17.62 -16:51:00.6:  12.13 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:51:17.32 -16:28:46.8:  12.06 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2:  11.96 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:07:17.62 -16:51:00.6:  12.07 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2:  11.95 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:51:17.32 -16:28:46.8:  12.02 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.2:  11.94 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.05 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.11 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  11.95 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:51:17.32 -16:28:46.8: ref_mag=12.05 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9899 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:07:17.62 -16:51:00.6: ref_mag=12.11 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0454 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9437 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:58:18.90 -16:02:34.2: ref_mag=11.95 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9196 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20107_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 20107_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    11.91    00:58:18.91 -16:02:34.4   4065 2008   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    11.93    00:58:18.88 -16:02:34.1   4063 2009   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20109_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 20109_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    11.93    00:59:10.35 -18:44:46.2   3954 3644   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    11.96    00:59:10.34 -18:44:46.2   3953 3645   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20110_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 20110_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    12.01    00:51:17.33 -16:28:46.8   5085 2270   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    11.97    00:51:17.32 -16:28:46.7   5084 2271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20111_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 20111_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    12.03    01:07:17.62 -16:51:00.8   2767 2513   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.07    01:07:17.62 -16:51:00.3   2765 2514   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Image size: 941.4'x627.2'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.1'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0055 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Image size: 936.9'x624.2'  15.6(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:53:18.816 -18:00:37.64
Second-epoch image center 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0032 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:53:20.214 -18:00:37.72
Second-epoch second image center 00:53:19.503 -18:00:31.31
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00333 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LeJ7d9tdu1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sVgaIROLdC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits &> /tmp/tmp.votdaAUrTs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oTzk9kCJno
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits and wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.766400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.766400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.15

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.15

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 24286 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9472 to 21.9799 deg, Dec -23.3411 to -12.4232 deg
Loaded 4198 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3243 out of 3443 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3443 out of 24286 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 21682 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.9497 to 21.9802 deg, Dec -23.3291 to -12.4255 deg
Loaded 4192 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 2550 out of 2661 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2661 out of 21682 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (aperture=4.8)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 2.0 pix  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
 2.8 pix  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
 15.0 mag.  Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
 14.8 mag.  fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.8 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LeJ7d9tdu1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=893, bad_region=4833, passed=24282
Got 24282 stars (including 18732 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 24282 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4880 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4885 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4880 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20545 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4880 stars left (next iteration limit 5368)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits N_match=4880 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.293 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1559 n_q2=934 n_q3=1493 n_q4=894 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sVgaIROLdC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=669, bad_region=3901, passed=21676
Got 21676 stars (including 17202 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 21676 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4870 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4870 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 389 (Dec -23.3 to -12.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4873 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4868 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18628 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4868 stars left (next iteration limit 5357)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits N_match=4868 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.287 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1587 n_q2=945 n_q3=1469 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.074
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits -region wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.votdaAUrTs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1202, bad_region=3074, passed=18408
Got 18408 stars (including 14802 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4875 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4875 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16051 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4875 stars left (next iteration limit 5362)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=6.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.534 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.476 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4875 robust_rms=0.388 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.470 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4875 robust_rms_before=1.061 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.398 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.462 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.476
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.462 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits N_match=4875 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.436 n_q1=1636 n_q2=915 n_q3=1515 n_q4=809 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.215
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oTzk9kCJno (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:    -1.0    -1.0     1.0     1.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  7500.0     0.0  9576.0  6388.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1122.0  1550.0  1124.0  1552.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1637.0  2824.0  1639.0  2826.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1831.0  2839.0  1833.0  2841.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1905.0  4570.0  1907.0  4572.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2012.0  4693.0  2014.0  4695.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2397.0  4241.0  2399.0  4243.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  2679.0  2807.0  2681.0  2809.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=1214, bad_region=3163, passed=18606
Got 18606 stars (including 14931 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 18606 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013013 (46.8 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010410 (37.5 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4873 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4873 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16155 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Excluding outliers - 4873 stars left (next iteration limit 5360)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=6.406 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.296 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.455 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4873 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4873 robust_rms_before=1.043 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.390 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.438 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.455
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.438 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits N_match=4873 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.383 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.420 n_q1=1622 n_q2=918 n_q3=1520 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/wcs_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:37:46.15 -17:50:48.2:  13.84 +/- 0.06  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:00:30.01 -19:24:26.0:  13.44 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:37:46.15 -17:50:48.2:  14.01 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.90 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:37:46.15 -17:50:48.2: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9125 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:00:30.01 -19:24:26.0:  13.38 +/- 0.05  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.41 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:00:30.01 -19:24:26.0: ref_mag=13.41 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3914 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:47:05.02 -19:45:32.6:  13.91 +/- 0.07  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:10:24.59 -20:01:56.3:  14.64 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:40.2:  14.78 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:47:05.02 -19:45:32.6:  13.88 +/- 0.09  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:10:24.59 -20:01:56.3:  14.69 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:47:05.02 -19:45:32.6: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.8997 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:24.59 -20:01:56.3: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3391 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_19-58-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0017.fits at 01:20:39.99 -18:18:19.9:  15.02 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:40.2:  14.66 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:43:42.25 -19:45:40.2: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3905 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-01-20_20-29-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0067.fits at 01:20:39.99 -18:18:19.9:  14.63 +/- 0.17  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:20:39.99 -18:18:19.9: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.6196 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30733_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30733_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    13.84    00:37:46.23 -17:50:48.0   7032 3118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.02    00:37:46.07 -17:50:48.3   7031 3119   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30742_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30742_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    11.02    00:37:23.50 -15:15:05.8   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30748_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30748_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    11.91    01:19:19.72 -13:55:31.9   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30750_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30750_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.03    01:21:06.35 -15:25:40.7   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30759_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30759_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.28    00:58:37.33 -16:21:50.9   4020 2204   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30779_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30779_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.85    01:07:37.82 -21:55:04.9   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30788_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30788_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.99    01:18:34.67 -20:48:28.5   1201 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30789_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30789_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    12.96    01:12:25.59 -19:46:29.4   2065 4304   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30791_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30791_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.07    01:15:58.03 -21:43:08.7   1592 5505   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30793_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30793_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.13    01:03:26.66 -17:32:26.9   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30802_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30802_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.26    01:13:09.81 -14:15:16.0   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30805_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30805_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.12    00:38:12.50 -14:37:59.9   7007 1168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30806_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30806_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.33    01:19:33.79 -16:44:12.6   0970 2491   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30807_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.20    00:38:01.30 -21:33:59.3   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30808_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30808_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.15    00:41:38.28 -16:06:08.5   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30810_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30810_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.18    00:38:41.70 -14:19:40.0   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30814_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30814_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.23    01:14:39.45 -21:45:30.8   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30824_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30824_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.49    01:11:43.67 -14:08:41.9   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30825_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30825_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.46    01:14:40.26 -22:09:39.6   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30829_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30829_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.33    00:41:33.88 -18:31:27.6   6476 3519   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30830_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30830_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.46    00:41:20.14 -14:06:15.6   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30831_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30831_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    13.42    01:00:30.00 -19:24:26.0   3768 4045   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.36    01:00:30.01 -19:24:26.0   3767 4046   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30832_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30832_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.73    01:15:35.93 -16:12:54.2   1542 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30834_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30834_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.49    01:12:31.93 -19:50:53.6   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30841_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30841_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.64    00:49:15.98 -20:59:44.8   5364 5003   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30843_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30843_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.32    00:38:24.72 -17:33:28.8   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30855_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30855_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.49    00:43:40.79 -21:52:21.0   6148 5544   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30856_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30856_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.54    00:58:00.57 -22:04:45.5   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30857_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30857_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.75    01:17:47.99 -14:24:01.7   1179 1058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30858_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30858_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.69    01:11:04.92 -18:26:24.0   2238 3489   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30860_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30860_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.71    01:04:26.40 -13:52:05.7   3150 0697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30864_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30864_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.74    01:03:14.55 -14:13:39.6   3330 0914   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30867_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30867_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.52    00:48:31.78 -20:25:07.4   5470 4654   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30871_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30871_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.75    01:11:45.32 -20:13:03.0   2168 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30876_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30876_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.53    00:57:22.40 -15:14:23.5   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30882_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30882_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.95    01:17:25.06 -16:05:51.3   1272 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30885_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30885_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.82    01:19:05.20 -19:09:41.7   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30886_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30886_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.07    01:21:36.52 -17:22:16.4   0684 2888   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30891_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30891_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.71    01:18:31.58 -20:26:57.4   1201 4745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30899_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30899_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.88    01:09:47.54 -19:04:52.6   2433 3873   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30900_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30900_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.75    00:42:53.37 -18:58:30.9   6282 3789   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30906_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30906_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.34    01:18:10.26 -19:39:22.4   1236 4260   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30908_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30908_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.65    00:42:09.85 -17:42:05.5   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30910_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30910_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.99    01:20:09.59 -19:46:25.4   0951 4343   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30911_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30911_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.55    00:55:39.08 -21:58:05.2   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30918_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30918_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.17    00:36:10.42 -20:37:52.0   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30920_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30920_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.76    00:59:41.80 -17:25:07.5   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30924_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30924_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.14    00:43:58.74 -19:40:16.7   6121 4208   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30929_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30929_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.84    01:10:17.81 -16:00:47.8   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30931_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30931_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.12    01:04:31.37 -14:05:16.7   3140 0831   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30935_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30935_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.17    00:43:30.51 -17:42:14.8   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30936_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30936_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.03    01:12:12.26 -21:47:41.9   2128 5532   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30938_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30938_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    14.01    00:47:05.00 -19:45:33.5   5680 4255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.83    00:47:05.04 -19:45:31.7   5678 4256   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30939_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30939_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.07    00:58:24.88 -21:36:53.3   4074 5381   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30940_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30940_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.97    00:39:37.02 -20:13:36.3   6738 4555   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30948_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30948_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.05    01:15:53.54 -18:42:53.7   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30949_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30949_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.22    00:47:06.97 -15:00:52.8   5696 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30951_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30951_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    14.31    01:10:24.53 -20:01:56.6   2360 4451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.38    01:10:24.64 -20:01:55.9   2358 4452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30953_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30953_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    13.99    01:01:26.04 -22:07:50.7   3652 5700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30954_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30954_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.55    01:20:27.90 -20:08:35.3   0915 4570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30958_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30958_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.02    00:35:16.68 -20:23:48.2   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30961_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30961_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.28    01:03:56.10 -17:30:50.0   3259 2908   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

**** FOUND  01:03:56.13 -17:30:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30963_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30963_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.09    00:39:13.14 -20:23:46.2   6793 4659   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30965_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30965_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.49    01:21:07.12 -14:53:40.9   0696 1374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30967_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30967_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.43    01:09:56.58 -16:01:41.5   2368 2023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30970_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30970_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.17    01:16:07.44 -21:24:29.6   1564 5316   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30980_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30980_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.88    01:07:41.42 -16:57:14.5   2709 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30983_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30983_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.34    00:54:05.40 -20:40:27.7   4682 4807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30988_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30988_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.32    01:00:42.13 -18:30:47.9   3732 3506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30989_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30989_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.19    01:12:21.46 -18:01:22.6   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30991_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30991_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.46    01:04:07.33 -15:00:05.6   3208 1386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30992_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30992_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.43    01:16:10.92 -20:33:51.9   1540 4802   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30993_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30993_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    14.38    00:43:42.19 -19:45:40.4   6161 4262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.40    00:43:42.30 -19:45:39.9   6159 4263   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30996_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30996_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.44    00:34:51.80 -16:24:02.8   7473 2251   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30998_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 30998_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.52    01:11:12.85 -15:51:43.6   2179 1926   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31000_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 31000_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.87    00:45:31.05 -14:31:58.0   5933 1095   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31001_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 31001_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.41859    2461270.91859    14.62    01:20:39.88 -18:18:19.4   0846 3450   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-02-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0486.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.62    01:20:40.09 -18:18:20.4   0844 3452   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31004_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 31004_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.67    01:07:13.04 -21:38:10.5   2832 5415   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31007_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 31007_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.36    00:36:23.43 -13:52:24.9   7286 0709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31017_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487
The candidate 31017_fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.41902    2461270.91902    14.36    00:36:04.84 -17:06:57.5   7285 2681   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_050852_TTUQ2b1x1_2603691_DGrKDViK/fd_Cet-10-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_05-03-13_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHT_0487.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
########### Completed Cet-10-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
###################################################################################
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.91859267 -observatory V36
09:13:37.04 +17:31:58.4 Mercury (-1.5mag)
12:37:30.78 -05:56:50.2 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:18:40.86 +23:42:03.3 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:02.60 +18:06:39.8 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:22.97 +03:06:04.8 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:44.45 +20:59:33.6 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:25.89 +00:08:21.8 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:11.48 -23:33:53.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:07:01.26 -18:19:58.2 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 18 05:11 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.91859267:
08:52:10.02 +18:06:07.0 Io (6.1mag)
08:52:03.92 +18:06:34.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:51.39 +18:07:30.4 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:51:43.97 +18:08:02.3 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:49:30.46 +18:12:17.5 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:52:00.70 +18:06:48.8 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:49:08.25 +18:08:51.5 Elara (17.7mag)
08:56:11.19 +17:41:33.2 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:54:32.09 +18:19:16.8 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:34.63 +03:05:59.9 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:25.41 +03:06:06.4 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:54.85 +03:07:00.3 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:38.73 +03:05:45.4 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:32.53 +02:57:58.2 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 05:11 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.91859267:
19:49:24.45 -16:57:08.4 JWST
12:11:35.77 +49:06:40.9 Chandra
11:42:25.46 -61:04:39.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 05:11 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.91859267 -observatory V36
03:24:30.87 +18:10:14.2 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:59.63 -34:31:45.7 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:03.75 -69:18:46.0 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:18.63 +33:13:00.3 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:11:38.06 +41:20:51.1 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:30:04.71 +30:43:16.1 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:53:18.98 +26:21:28.1 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:02.45 +28:01:10.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:35:41.23 +05:18:26.2 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:36.06 -12:42:16.8 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:57:54.02 +64:41:19.3 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:39:05.65 -13:52:35.5 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:19:11.53 +31:49:10.0 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:50.76 +15:32:33.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:51:01.38 +43:27:17.2 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:55:23.31 +49:38:07.1 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:57.80 -12:53:56.8 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:02:27.71 +22:19:53.8 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:47:26.68 +20:13:59.8 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:04:39.23 +01:38:35.5 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:06:23.01 +76:45:35.8 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:49.28 +46:19:55.6 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:55:24.73 +09:34:01.2 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:08:45.56 -31:07:26.8 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:13.31 -04:03:12.8 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:28:26.00 +01:18:23.4 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:42.69 -05:53:42.1 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:16.70 +20:24:49.5 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:58.64 -24:37:40.4 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:09:26.73 +14:20:38.9 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:21:11.72 +26:11:42.1 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:35:44.41 +20:51:41.2 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:29:54.12 +28:57:59.6 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:42:30.23 +24:50:20.7 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:04:22.16 -14:08:21.9 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:51:16.95 +21:05:30.1 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:45:35.84 +18:20:50.6 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:58.21 +03:13:18.6 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:13:59.48 -18:46:40.1 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:50:43.94 +38:07:02.5 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:55:40.01 +35:29:26.9 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:00:19.49 +09:29:49.4 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:49.87 -10:50:45.6 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:14.63 -52:15:15.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:51:51.49 +29:19:23.6 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:35:48.58 +37:19:36.6 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:21.66 +02:00:01.7 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:10:09.86 +17:52:05.1 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 05:11 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 05:11 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 05:11 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:42:19.872 +11:23:33.24  AT 2026wyg  2026-07-27.36 20.362
22:23:18.161 -03:42:46.81  AT 2026wyf  2026-08-02.43 19.8981
23:01:54.687 -22:43:32.99  SN 2026wye  2026-08-02.38 19.1478
21:53:38.707 -07:26:43.02  AT 2026wyd  2026-08-02.36 19.6168
22:49:50.870 -46:36:08.90  AT 2026wyc  2026-08-03.35 17.2
21:36:41.623 +15:19:50.35  AT 2026wyb  2026-07-18.75 20.3
21:50:57.870 +21:21:44.04  AT 2026wya  2026-07-18.75 20.78
14:05:12.660 -00:47:11.60  AT 2026wxz  2026-08-01.61 20.44
04:58:05.316 +09:12:46.13  AT 2026wxy  2026-07-29.49 17.3027
19:55:18.916 +04:09:22.19  AT 2026wxx  2026-07-23.35 20.806
16:04:20.254 -02:01:58.81  AT 2026wxw  2026-07-05.20 20.2659
18:46:54.548 +16:48:18.74  AT 2026wxv  2026-06-24.31 19.7189
23:46:24.941 +43:49:43.79  AT 2026wxu  2026-07-03.43 19.6427
18:51:17.703 +37:10:07.59  AT 2026wxt  2026-07-04.30 20.0164
01:01:55.949 +41:41:30.57  AT 2026wxs  2026-07-01.41 19.2645
14:20:50.231 +61:16:12.38  AT 2026wxr  2026-07-12.22 19.9923
19:31:40.957 -26:44:38.76  AT 2026wxq  2026-07-24.28 19.6734
13:18:44.218 -20:30:38.57  AT 2026wxp  2026-04-17.43 20.98
12:55:43.929 +27:34:40.69  AT 2026wxo  2026-04-21.42 21.19
10:15:49.208 -16:52:33.53  AT 2026wxn  2026-04-22.26 20.69
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 05:11 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug 18 05:10:49 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 2s (0.03 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 6s (0.10 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 34s (0.57 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 5 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 8s (0.13 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 1s (0.02 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 19s (0.32 min)
FIELD_Cet-10-Q2b1x1: 65s (1.08 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 67s (1.12 min)
Finished: Tue Aug 18 05:11:56 CDT 2026