######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cet-09-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-09-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310982 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 310982 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits

renamed 'Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits_preview.png'
Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits

Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2300.5383
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 471.8181
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1367.1240
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 515.3522
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1364.5331
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 515.1177
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 0.594263
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:52:36.1931778' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:52:36.1931778' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61270.4115300118 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:52:46.0984636' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61270.411644653 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.997202672677 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9997915361282 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.9988888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 195.206666666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.6588859317825 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.2600002288818 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits :)
Spent 0.497492 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:53:38.5393650' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:53:38.5393650' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61270.4122516089 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:53:48.4391034' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61270.4123661923 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= 0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 359.997202619054 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = -17.9997915412358 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 36.9419444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 195.506944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.66106624968913 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cet-09' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 00 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-18 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS = 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 20428 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 20.0 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT= 10.6 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY= 50.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE= 904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP = 21.5 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR = 50.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST= 9.400752 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD = 6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits :)
Spent 0.494637 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/d_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 37096.658242
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=24199.0, right_median=29433.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits

fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits

Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.91164575
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0017 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01421 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dDOC50iuOB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.D8dY0D3DYg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jH3LzCdUvC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2vDpTlSTdv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.377200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.377200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.29
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5854 to 8.4425 deg, Dec -23.2540 to -12.6292 deg
Loaded 4133 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1989 out of 2020 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2020 out of 2460 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=6.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5961 to 8.4401 deg, Dec -23.2424 to -12.6281 deg
Loaded 4123 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 1992 out of 2014 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 2014 out of 2454 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=6.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
2.2 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
2.9 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
14.1 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dDOC50iuOB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=208, bad_region=499, passed=2460
Got 2460 stars (including 1784 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2460 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5854 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5854
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1723 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5853 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5853
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1726 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2032 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 1723 stars left (next iteration limit 1895)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=1723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=568 n_q2=322 n_q3=534 n_q4=299 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.041
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.D8dY0D3DYg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=201, bad_region=492, passed=2454
Got 2454 stars (including 1791 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2454 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4401, gap 8.4401 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 1729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5952 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5952
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.2 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 1733 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 1729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 2031 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 1729 stars left (next iteration limit 1901)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=1729 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.328 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.329 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=569 n_q2=319 n_q3=549 n_q4=292 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.054
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jH3LzCdUvC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=334, bad_region=893, passed=4571
Got 4571 stars (including 3496 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4571 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5961 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5961
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3398 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3396 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3396 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3396 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5966 through 0 to 8.4410, gap 8.4410 to 351.5966
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3396 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3396 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3861 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 3396 stars left (next iteration limit 3735)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3396 robust_rms=6.748 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=9.015 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3396 robust_rms=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.389 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3396 robust_rms=0.339 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.391 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=3396 robust_rms_before=1.293 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.347 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.360 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.389 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.389
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.389 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits N_match=3396 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.341 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.375 n_q1=1097 n_q2=607 n_q3=1104 n_q4=588 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.097
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2vDpTlSTdv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, bad_region=870, passed=4548
Got 4548 stars (including 3497 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4548 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5957 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5957
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3400 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3398 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3398 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5960 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5960
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3401 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3397 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3397 stars left (next iteration limit 3737)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=3397 robust_rms=6.816 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.860 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=3397 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.405 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=3397 robust_rms=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.385 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=3397 robust_rms_before=1.048 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.340 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.335 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.388 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.385
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.388 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits N_match=3397 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.383 n_q1=1092 n_q2=608 n_q3=1115 n_q4=582 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.327 worst_q_ratio=1.041
ref2=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.335 worst_q_ratio=1.054
new1=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits sigma_overall=0.341 worst_q_ratio=1.097
new2=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits sigma_overall=0.346 worst_q_ratio=1.107
reference average sigma_overall=0.331 worst_q_ratio=1.0475
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (1723 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (1729 matched stars from wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.29 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476_astrometric_residuals.png (3396 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.30 arcsec)

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477_astrometric_residuals.png (3397 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)

Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:50.31 -17:58:43.8: 11.35 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.5: 10.77 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:15.0: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:50.31 -17:58:43.8: 11.32 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.5: 10.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:15.0: 10.76 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:50.31 -17:58:43.8: ref_mag=11.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.2172 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:48.54 -17:47:26.5: ref_mag=10.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=10.9121 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:56.38 -20:39:15.0: ref_mag=10.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.0952 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20092_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 11.08 | 00:05:56.36 -20:39:15.3 | 3948 4804 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 11.11 | 00:05:56.41 -20:39:14.7 | 3954 4798 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20093_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 10.87 | 23:55:48.50 -17:47:26.7 | 5391 3069 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 10.96 | 23:55:48.59 -17:47:26.3 | 5397 3064 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20404_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 10.90 | 00:02:07.39 -14:40:37.9 | 4483 1178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
**** FOUND 00:02:07.39 -14:40:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20476_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20476_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 11.16 | 23:49:36.82 -15:51:00.2 | 6307 1897 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
**** FOUND 23:49:36.82 -15:51:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20495_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20495_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 11.20 | 00:12:50.31 -17:58:43.9 | 2941 3199 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 11.23 | 00:12:50.31 -17:58:43.7 | 2947 3193 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 01803_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 7.93 | 23:43:49.94 -15:17:08.6 | 7159 1567 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
**** FOUND 23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 937.3'x624.3' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0017 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Image size: 936.8'x624.1' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 23:59:59.944 -18:00:06.42
Second-epoch image center 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0125 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 23:59:59.619 -18:00:02.48
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:02.287 -18:00:36.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01421 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LWmndXPNCR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VkpgSrRz9k
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Lv4jFawoUF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits &> /tmp/tmp.l05KWerqGt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits and wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.243850
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.243850
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -8.02
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.22
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:

Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 14972 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5847 to 8.4424 deg, Dec -23.2610 to -12.6028 deg
Loaded 4152 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3358 out of 3457 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3457 out of 14972 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (aperture=4.8)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 15163 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.5857 to 8.4400 deg, Dec -23.2549 to -12.6016 deg
Loaded 4148 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3365 out of 3470 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3470 out of 15163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits:

Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (aperture=4.7)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 24 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
2.1 pix Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
2.8 pix fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
14.2 mag. Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 13.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.LWmndXPNCR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=477, bad_region=2343, passed=14965
Got 14965 stars (including 12255 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14965 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5847 through 0 to 8.4424, gap 8.4424 to 351.5847
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4850 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4850 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5844 through 0 to 8.4425, gap 8.4425 to 351.5844
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4859 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4851 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4851 stars left (next iteration limit 5335)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4851 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.395 n_q1=1541 n_q2=825 n_q3=1604 n_q4=881 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.043
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VkpgSrRz9k (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=1, blended=621, bad_region=2493, passed=15162
Got 15162 stars (including 12248 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15162 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5857 through 0 to 8.4400, gap 8.4400 to 351.5857
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5846 through 0 to 8.4402, gap 8.4402 to 351.5846
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 13254 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.394 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.395 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.391 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.372 n_q1=1540 n_q2=830 n_q3=1606 n_q4=867 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.069
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Lv4jFawoUF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1504, bad_region=3486, passed=20220
Got 20220 stars (including 16154 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20220 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5177 through 0 to 8.4422, gap 8.4422 to 351.5177
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5182 through 0 to 8.4434, gap 8.4434 to 351.5182
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17543 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=6.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.620 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.451 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.440 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=1.301 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.370 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.392 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.444 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.451
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.366 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.324 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.401 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.369 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1590 n_q2=864 n_q3=1572 n_q4=801 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.095
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.l05KWerqGt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1454, bad_region=3466, passed=20295
Got 20295 stars (including 16231 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20295 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 936.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 936.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013011 (46.8 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010409 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5841 through 0 to 8.4403, gap 8.4403 to 351.5841
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5843 through 0 to 8.4409, gap 8.4409 to 351.5843
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 333 to 388 (Dec -23.3 to -12.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17657 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=6.659 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.437 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4827 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.424 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 3
SIP_REFIT: order=3 matched=4827 robust_rms_before=1.058 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.378 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.396 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.440 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.437
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.440 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.373 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.363 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.434 n_q1=1597 n_q2=857 n_q3=1560 n_q4=813 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.163
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/wcs_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:46.8: 13.97 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:17:09.97 -19:18:05.2: 14.17 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:54:04.32 -16:21:46.5: 14.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:01.4: 13.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:33.02 -21:23:30.4: 14.02 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.33 -21:12:35.6: 13.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:19.02 -21:29:12.1: 13.90 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:59:57.71 -16:25:42.8: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:15:25.36 -21:26:39.9: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:05:18.46 -16:21:35.1: 13.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:59:57.71 -16:25:42.8: 14.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.33 -21:12:35.6: 13.72 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:46.8: 13.84 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:01.4: 13.71 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:54:04.32 -16:21:46.5: 14.91 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:25.36 -21:26:39.9: 13.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:05:18.46 -16:21:35.1: 13.74 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:19.02 -21:29:12.1: 13.91 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:15:33.02 -21:23:30.4: 14.25 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:17:09.97 -19:18:05.2: 14.14 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.52 -21:53:46.8: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6904 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.33 -21:12:35.6: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.5178 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:28.71 -22:12:01.4: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.4917 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:25.36 -21:26:39.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.5651 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:05:18.46 -16:21:35.1: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.7198 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:33.02 -21:23:30.4: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.7144 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:15:19.02 -21:29:12.1: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6616 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:17:09.97 -19:18:05.2: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.6842 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:41.16 -18:24:03.9: 13.79 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:12:40.75 -20:42:24.2: 14.13 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:14:42.22 -16:57:09.0: 13.87 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:21.17 -21:06:41.1: 14.22 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:13:19.50 -21:18:39.8: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:34.67 -22:03:00.9: 14.23 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:34.4: 13.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 00:18:01.23 -21:52:16.1: 14.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:41.16 -18:24:03.9: 13.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:01.23 -21:52:16.1: 13.85 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:14:42.22 -16:57:09.0: 14.13 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:34.4: 13.69 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:34.67 -22:03:00.9: 14.18 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:18:21.17 -21:06:41.1: 14.05 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:12:40.75 -20:42:24.2: 14.35 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 00:13:19.50 -21:18:39.8: 13.91 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.94 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.13 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:41.16 -18:24:03.9: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7148 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:06:56.42 -22:09:34.4: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.6384 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:42.22 -16:57:09.0: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.7724 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:21.17 -21:06:41.1: ref_mag=14.13 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.7138 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:19.50 -21:18:39.8: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.6197 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:01.23 -21:52:16.1: ref_mag=13.94 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.6811 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:12:40.75 -20:42:24.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=13.8177 delta=0.41 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:18:34.67 -22:03:00.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=13.7808 delta=0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:49.9: 13.81 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:45:07.30 -20:41:33.6: 13.96 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:51:42.77 -21:59:25.8: 13.73 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-35-29_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0472.fits at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:46.8: 14.25 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:49.9: 13.77 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:51:42.77 -21:59:25.8: 13.72 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:46.8: 14.08 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:47:50.16 -22:00:49.9: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.8106 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-07-12_05-36-13_20.00sec_4.90C_LIGHT_0473.fits at 23:45:07.30 -20:41:33.6: 14.20 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:42.77 -21:59:25.8: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.7577 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:54.32 -22:05:46.8: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=13.6875 delta=0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:45:07.30 -20:41:33.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=13.8778 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out21539.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out22151.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20942_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 20942_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.72 | 00:05:18.46 -16:21:35.9 | 4018 2206 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.72 | 00:05:18.46 -16:21:34.3 | 4024 2200 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21539_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 21539_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22151_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
Preparing report for the candidate 22151_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23006_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23006_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.50 | 00:18:28.71 -22:12:01.4 | 2189 5782 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.49 | 00:18:28.72 -22:12:01.3 | 2195 5776 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23078_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23078_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.55 | 00:18:21.34 -21:12:36.0 | 2192 5177 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.49 | 00:18:21.32 -21:12:35.2 | 2198 5171 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23185_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23185_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.58 | 00:15:25.22 -21:26:39.1 | 2612 5308 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.55 | 00:15:25.50 -21:26:40.7 | 2618 5302 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23216_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23216_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.61 | 00:15:33.01 -21:23:30.8 | 2593 5277 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.91 | 00:15:33.03 -21:23:30.0 | 2599 5271 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23270_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23270_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.67 | 00:17:09.92 -19:18:04.3 | 2335 4013 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.71 | 00:17:10.02 -19:18:06.0 | 2341 4008 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23301_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23301_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.66 | 00:15:18.99 -21:29:11.8 | 2627 5333 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.67 | 00:15:19.05 -21:29:12.3 | 2633 5328 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23304_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23304_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.69 | 00:17:09.53 -21:53:47.0 | 2371 5591 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.69 | 00:17:09.51 -21:53:46.6 | 2378 5585 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23324_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23324_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.64 | 00:13:19.52 -21:18:38.8 | 2907 5220 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.60 | 00:13:19.48 -21:18:40.9 | 2914 5214 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23341_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23341_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.69 | 00:18:01.27 -21:52:16.0 | 2249 5579 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.67 | 00:18:01.19 -21:52:16.2 | 2255 5573 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23345_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23345_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.71 | 00:18:21.17 -21:06:41.0 | 2191 5117 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.71 | 00:18:21.18 -21:06:41.3 | 2197 5112 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23351_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23351_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.73 | 00:18:34.71 -22:03:00.2 | 2173 5691 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.84 | 00:18:34.63 -22:03:01.6 | 2179 5685 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23411_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23411_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.64 | 00:06:56.43 -22:09:34.5 | 3815 5720 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.64 | 00:06:56.40 -22:09:34.2 | 3821 5714 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23446_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23446_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.77 | 00:14:42.20 -16:57:08.9 | 2659 2582 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.77 | 00:14:42.24 -16:57:09.2 | 2665 2577 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23451_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23451_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.71 | 00:13:41.13 -18:24:03.9 | 2824 3457 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.72 | 00:13:41.18 -18:24:04.0 | 2830 3451 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23525_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23525_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.77 | 00:12:40.73 -20:42:24.1 | 2992 4851 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.89 | 00:12:40.77 -20:42:24.3 | 2999 4845 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23946_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 23946_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.73 | 23:51:42.82 -21:59:26.3 | 5954 5618 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.79 | 23:51:42.73 -21:59:25.2 | 5961 5612 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24036_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 24036_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.71 | 23:48:54.34 -22:05:47.4 | 6349 5689 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.67 | 23:48:54.30 -22:05:46.2 | 6355 5683 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 24121_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.75 | 23:47:50.23 -22:00:48.3 | 6500 5642 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 13.89 | 23:47:50.09 -22:00:51.4 | 6507 5636 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 24213_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 24213_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 1 | 2026 08 18.41165 | 2461270.91165 | 13.77 | 23:45:07.34 -20:41:32.9 | 6898 4847 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-52-36_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0476.fits |
| Discovery image 2 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 14.12 | 23:45:07.26 -20:41:34.4 | 6904 4841 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 12864_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 11.03 | 00:02:07.40 -14:40:38.0 | 4483 1178 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
**** FOUND 00:02:07.39 -14:40:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477
The candidate 13583_fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477 did not pass the final checks
| Discovery image 3 | 2026 08 18.41237 | 2461270.91237 | 7.83 | 23:43:49.94 -15:17:08.7 | 7159 1567 | /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_050653_TTUQ2b1x1_2521027_TswBHfoa/fd_Cet-09-Q2b1x1_2026-08-18_04-53-38_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0477.fits |
**** FOUND 23:43:49.93 -15:17:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-09-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
23:54:04.32 -16:21:46.5
23:59:57.71 -16:25:42.8
########### Completed Cet-09-Q2b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
23:54:04.32 -16:21:46.5
23:59:57.71 -16:25:42.8
###################################################################################
23:54:04.32 -16:21:46.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
23:59:57.71 -16:25:42.8 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.91164575 -observatory V36
09:13:33.67 +17:32:10.7 Mercury (-1.5mag)
12:37:29.38 -05:56:38.5 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:18:39.67 +23:42:03.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:02.23 +18:06:41.2 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:23.02 +03:06:05.2 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:44.42 +20:59:33.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:25.92 +00:08:22.1 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:11.52 -23:33:53.6 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:06:33.39 -18:18:17.0 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 18 05:09 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.91164575:
08:52:09.62 +18:06:08.6 Io (6.1mag)
08:52:03.43 +18:06:36.8 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:51.08 +18:07:31.5 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:51:43.65 +18:08:03.5 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:49:30.09 +18:12:18.6 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:52:00.29 +18:06:50.4 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:49:07.88 +18:08:52.7 Elara (17.7mag)
08:56:10.82 +17:41:34.8 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:54:31.75 +18:19:18.1 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:34.69 +03:06:00.3 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:25.51 +03:06:06.8 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:54.90 +03:07:00.7 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:38.78 +03:05:45.8 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:32.59 +02:57:58.8 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 05:09 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.91164575:
19:49:22.86 -16:57:35.2 JWST
12:04:17.47 +48:36:56.4 Chandra
11:37:07.46 -60:54:30.8 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 05:09 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.91164575 -observatory V36
03:24:30.46 +18:10:12.4 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:59.66 -34:31:46.1 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:03.38 -69:18:44.9 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:18.54 +33:12:59.8 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:11:37.06 +41:20:43.5 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:30:05.07 +30:43:18.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:53:18.60 +26:21:28.5 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:02.05 +28:01:11.7 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:35:40.95 +05:18:26.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:35.95 -12:42:15.7 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:57:54.51 +64:41:23.1 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:39:05.94 -13:52:33.2 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:19:11.09 +31:49:08.8 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:50.78 +15:32:33.4 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:51:01.84 +43:27:16.9 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:55:23.95 +49:38:06.6 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:57.49 -12:53:56.8 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:02:27.47 +22:19:58.4 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:47:26.06 +20:14:01.5 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:04:38.94 +01:38:37.3 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:06:22.64 +76:45:38.8 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:49.26 +46:19:55.4 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:55:24.36 +09:33:58.9 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:08:45.21 -31:07:19.0 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:13.04 -04:03:11.1 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:28:25.15 +01:18:31.5 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:42.80 -05:53:40.9 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:15.79 +20:24:50.4 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:59.00 -24:37:38.0 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:09:26.44 +14:20:37.5 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:21:10.72 +26:11:45.9 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:35:43.18 +20:51:31.3 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:29:52.78 +28:58:03.5 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:42:29.25 +24:50:25.3 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:04:21.29 -14:08:12.6 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:51:16.37 +21:05:30.4 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:45:35.16 +18:20:52.0 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:58.35 +03:13:19.3 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:13:59.89 -18:46:41.0 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:50:42.56 +38:07:02.2 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:55:46.28 +35:30:00.6 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:00:18.86 +09:29:49.9 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:49.57 -10:50:43.7 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:14.78 -52:15:17.7 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:51:50.29 +29:19:13.7 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:35:47.35 +37:19:37.9 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:21.47 +02:00:04.6 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:10:09.48 +17:52:06.4 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 05:09 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40 AT2026wdy 2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90 AT2026wek 2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60 ASASSN-26ev 2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20 SN2026wgm 2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00 ASASSN-26er 2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00 SN2026vbh 2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90 ASASSN-26eq 2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60 ASASSN-26ep 2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50 ASASSN-26et 2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60 SN2026uwk 2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90 ASASSN-26en 2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10 ASASSN-26es 2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00 ASASSN-26em 2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70 ASASSN-26eu 2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40 AT2026ugi 2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80 ASASSN-26eo 2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80 ASASSN-26ej 2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90 ASASSN-26ek 2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50 ASASSN-26el 2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30 ASASSN-26ei 2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10 AT 2023mhb 2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20 AT 2026unl 2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80 ASASSN-26eh 2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80 ASASSN-22le 2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30 ASASSN-26ef 2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70 SN 2026qtn 2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40 ASASSN-26ec 2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50 AT2026stb 2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00 AT2026pjf 2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70 SN2026pir 2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30 ASASSN-26ed 2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10 AT2026qil 2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10 ASASSN-26ee 2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80 AT2026ryu 2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50 AT2026qqg 2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30 AT2026qly 2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10 ASASSN-26ea 2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30 ASASSN-26eb 2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20 SN 2026qqp 2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90 ASASSN-26dz 2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90 AT 2026rdg 2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40 AT 2026qpr 2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80 SN 2026pub 2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70 SN 2026pel 2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30 ASASSN-26dy 2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30 ASASSN-26dv 2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70 ASASSN-26dw 2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20 SN 2026mke 2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50 SN 2026nmv 2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50 AT2026oxh 2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90 ASASSN-26dx 2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10 AT2026pvk 2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20 AT2026plb 2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30 SN2026ore 2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30 AT2026oxl 2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20 AT2026ouj 2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20 AT2026ntk 2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20 ASASSN-26du 2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00 SN2026oxc 2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70 AT2026ovz 2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50 AT2026nwc 2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20 SN 2026odc 2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20 SN 2026nyq 2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90 ASASSN-26dt 2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60 SN2026nyp 2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50 SN2026mta 2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20 SN2026oao 2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60 AT2026nvf 2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00 SN2026npn 2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20 ASASSN-26dq 2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70 SN 2026obc 2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90 ASASSN-26dr 2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00 ASASSN-26ds 2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40 SN2026mho 2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10 AT2026min 2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90 ASASSN-26no 2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60 ASASSN-26dp 2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40 ASASSN-26dn 2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60 AT2026nma 2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10 AT2026lli 2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70 AT2026nad 2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40 ASASSN-26dm 2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10 ASASSN-26dl 2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00 ASASSN-26dk 2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60 ASASSN-26dh 2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90 ASASSN-26dj 2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10 ASASSN-26dg 2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40 AT2026mhn 2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00 ASASSN-26di 2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00 AT2026kwu 2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90 AT2026ktm 2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40 AT2026lkm 2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80 SN2026kep 2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90 AT2026lkd 2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60 SN2026kmo 2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40 AT2026lxf 2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30 ASASSN-26df 2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60 2026lda 2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30 ASASSN-26de 2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60 ASASSN-26dd 2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 05:09 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6 PNV J09552128+6902526 2026-06-13.933 18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0 TCP J19512142+3706400 2026-06-17.2942 16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4 TCP J19570387+3741464 2026-06-18.2638 17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3 PNV J00423204+4110283 2026-06-26.059 16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8 TCP J02191736+2857158 2026-07-12.3549 12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6 PNV J00445643+4157416 2026-07-13.8026 17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0 PNV J00425536+4117270 2026-07-20.1813 17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9 TCP J20354364+6131329 2026-07-20.5443 14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0 TCP J21173148+2225510 2026-07-23.5577 14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8 PNV J00412404+4049028 2026-07-25.0157 18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6 PNV J00430426+4102286 2026-07-26.1512 20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0 TCP J14515140+6613240 2026-07-29.2561 13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2 PNV J00430615+4122082 2026-07-30.0085 19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2 PNV J00413323+4110122 2026-08-02.8913 17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4 TCP J05210763+2338194 2026-08-06.4109 11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8 TCP J22571796+4707418 2026-08-09.3289 14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1 PSN J09133817+7628181 2026-08-09.8037 15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6 PNV J00431729+4126486 2026-08-14.0920 16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6 PNV J00425282+4110586 2026-08-17.7723 19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6 PNV J00425283+4110596 2026-08-18.6119 19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 05:09 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:42:19.872 +11:23:33.24 AT 2026wyg 2026-07-27.36 20.362
22:23:18.161 -03:42:46.81 AT 2026wyf 2026-08-02.43 19.8981
23:01:54.687 -22:43:32.99 SN 2026wye 2026-08-02.38 19.1478
21:53:38.707 -07:26:43.02 AT 2026wyd 2026-08-02.36 19.6168
22:49:50.870 -46:36:08.90 AT 2026wyc 2026-08-03.35 17.2
21:36:41.623 +15:19:50.35 AT 2026wyb 2026-07-18.75 20.3
21:50:57.870 +21:21:44.04 AT 2026wya 2026-07-18.75 20.78
14:05:12.660 -00:47:11.60 AT 2026wxz 2026-08-01.61 20.44
04:58:05.316 +09:12:46.13 AT 2026wxy 2026-07-29.49 17.3027
19:55:18.916 +04:09:22.19 AT 2026wxx 2026-07-23.35 20.806
16:04:20.254 -02:01:58.81 AT 2026wxw 2026-07-05.20 20.2659
18:46:54.548 +16:48:18.74 AT 2026wxv 2026-06-24.31 19.7189
23:46:24.941 +43:49:43.79 AT 2026wxu 2026-07-03.43 19.6427
18:51:17.703 +37:10:07.59 AT 2026wxt 2026-07-04.30 20.0164
01:01:55.949 +41:41:30.57 AT 2026wxs 2026-07-01.41 19.2645
14:20:50.231 +61:16:12.38 AT 2026wxr 2026-07-12.22 19.9923
19:31:40.957 -26:44:38.76 AT 2026wxq 2026-07-24.28 19.6734
13:18:44.218 -20:30:38.57 AT 2026wxp 2026-04-17.43 20.98
12:55:43.929 +27:34:40.69 AT 2026wxo 2026-04-21.42 21.19
10:15:49.208 -16:52:33.53 AT 2026wxn 2026-04-22.26 20.69
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 05:09 tns_transients_list.txt