Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.4086  2461270.9086  13.76  00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0
125.08167 -70.43212 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
906 Repsolda                -1      0       1  13.8     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -crosshair 5166.68555 4649.37988 image    wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -crosshair 5168.17236 4652.12305 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40864 00 54 20.56 -07 34 21.0          13.8 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40837 00 54 20.59 -07 34 20.9          13.8 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40890 00 54 20.53 -07 34 21.1          13.7 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 18.4086*  00 54 20.56 -07 34 21.0  13.8 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9086,13.76,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4086 13.76CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.4086  2461270.9086  13.97  00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0
128.40614 -69.98737 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
893 Leopoldina              -0     -0       0  13.9     0    0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -crosshair 5846.49609 4915.64209 image    wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -crosshair 5848.03613 4918.41797 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40864 00 58 58.86 -07 11 45.0          14.0 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40837 00 58 58.88 -07 11 44.9          14.0 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40890 00 58 58.84 -07 11 45.0          14.0 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 18.4086*  00 58 58.86 -07 11 45.0  14.0 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9086,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4086 13.97CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 08 18.4086  2461270.9086  14.34  00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5
102.05290 -70.69487 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 3.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
1133 Lugduna                 -1     -0       1  14.2    -0   -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5:  15.62 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.                         Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits  wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -crosshair 692.21332 3520.72241 image    wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -crosshair 693.62189 3523.39722 image   

./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40864 00 24 02.23 -08 56 31.5          14.3 R      V36

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40837 00 24 02.29 -08 56 31.1          14.3 R      V36
     TAU0008  C2026 08 18.40890 00 24 02.17 -08 56 31.9          14.4 R      V36

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 08 18.4086*  00 24 02.23 -08 56 31.5  14.3 U             Cet       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9086,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4086 14.34CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

FITS images used in this processing run:

Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 reference image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 second-epoch image: Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last  image: 2461270.90890237 18.08.2026 09:48:39.165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 4
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  5414
Objects passed selection criteria:  5411
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.7    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5107.25
Average stars matched: 4922 (96.3728 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   231708 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 04:52:25 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
First image: 2461032.61603037 23.12.2025 02:46:55.024   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Last  image: 2461270.90890237 18.08.2026 09:48:39.165   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 204
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  25950
Objects passed selection criteria:  25887
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.6    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 23990.8
Average stars matched: 23195.8 (96.6862 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   248784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on  Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Tue Aug 18 04:53:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.5
FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK= yes
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= V36
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 10000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 8000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 3
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319418 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 319418 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits_preview.png'

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits


renamed 'Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits_preview.png'

Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 888.8278
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 475.8528
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1271.6829
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 487.8488
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1270.5238
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 487.7967
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.43074
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
INFO: the new-to-reference mean image value ratio check is disabled (DISABLE_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_RATIO_CHECK=yes) - expected with a background-subtracted reference image
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_DIR_OR_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:47:53.4018095' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:47:53.4018095' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4082569559 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:48:03.3034974' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61270.4083715626 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     12.8542666399277 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99957175901636 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     46.3827777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     178.114166666667 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.38004160516215 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits :)

Spent 0.533451 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature
AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Header: 74 keys total, 33 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-08-18T04:48:39.1652154' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-08-18T09:48:39.1652154' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61270.4087866321 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-08-18T09:48:49.0686669' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =       61270.40890125 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                  0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                 -0.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     12.8542665917807 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =    -9.99957176880388 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =              46.3875 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     178.388611111111 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.37993361122143 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1015.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =     33.7480555555556 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=    -101.958333333333 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-06'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '00 51 26'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-10 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser'        / Focusing equipment name" status=0
Record 50: "FOCPOS  =                29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 51: "FOCUSPOS=                29506 / [step] Focuser position" status=0
Record 52: "FOCUSSZ =                  0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0
Record 53: "FOCTEMP =     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 54: "FOCUSTEM=     23.2900009155273 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0
Record 55: "DEWPOINT=                 10.2 / [degC] Dew point" status=0
Record 56: "HUMIDITY=                 46.0 / [percent] Relative humidity" status=0
Record 57: "PRESSURE=               904.91 / [hPa] Air pressure" status=0
Record 58: "AMBTEMP =                 22.4 / [degC] Ambient air temperature" status=0
Record 59: "WINDDIR =                 47.0 / [deg] Wind direction: 0=N, 180=S, 90=E, 270=W" status=0
Record 60: "WINDGUST=             7.200576 / [kph] Wind gust" status=0
Record 61: "WINDSPD =             6.100488 / [kph] Wind speed" status=0
Record 62: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 63: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 64: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 65: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 66: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 67: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 68: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 69: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 70: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 71: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 72: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 73: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 74: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
SET-TEMP= 0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
CCD-TEMP= -0.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits :)

Spent 0.491138 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_0C_20s_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
try_to_calibrate_the_input_frame(): selected flat field /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit from directory /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/d_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 36313.440328
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23343.0, right_median=27331.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-08-12_multinight.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits



fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.90837270
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0737 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00535 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZQJJHQWRiF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zGLRI2GHJE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.69evwkmjSo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cuEa9sVMv9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.898500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.898500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.07

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8432 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3223 to -4.5646 deg
Loaded 3952 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3142 out of 3267 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3267 out of 5092 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=6.3)
Read 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8433 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3261 to -4.5647 deg
Loaded 3953 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3150 out of 3266 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3266 out of 5085 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=6.3)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 3.1 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
 3.0 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.1 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 15.1 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  12.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.ZQJJHQWRiF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=365, bad_region=0, passed=5092
Got 5092 stars (including 4723 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5092 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4636 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5092 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.311 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.240 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1035 n_q2=1250 n_q3=1126 n_q4=1222 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.170
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zGLRI2GHJE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=357, bad_region=0, passed=5085
Got 5085 stars (including 4722 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5085 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4633 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4635 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4633 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5085 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4633 stars left (next iteration limit 5096)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4633 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.252 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.225 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.229 n_q1=1046 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1120 n_q4=1208 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.229
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.69evwkmjSo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=241, bad_region=0, passed=5209
Got 5209 stars (including 4963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5209 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5209 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=10.957 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.485 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.390 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4864 robust_rms=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.330 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4864 robust_rms_before=0.942 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.274 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.282 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.339 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.330
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.339 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.317 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.234 n_q1=1238 n_q2=1174 n_q3=1317 n_q4=1135 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.180
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cuEa9sVMv9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=243, bad_region=0, passed=5212
Got 5212 stars (including 4964 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5212 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4865 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5212 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 4865 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=10.980 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.016 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.376 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4865 robust_rms=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.349 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4865 robust_rms_before=0.925 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.278 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.289 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.349
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=4865 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.230 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1237 n_q2=1173 n_q3=1304 n_q4=1151 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.170
ref2=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits sigma_overall=0.252 worst_q_ratio=1.229
new1=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits sigma_overall=0.269 worst_q_ratio=1.180
new2=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits sigma_overall=0.273 worst_q_ratio=1.221
reference average sigma_overall=0.259 worst_q_ratio=1.1995
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################

Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):

plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070_astrometric_residuals.png (4633 matched stars from wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432_astrometric_residuals.png (4864 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433_astrometric_residuals.png (4865 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.25 arcsec)


Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.3:  12.40 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:47.0:  12.12 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:47.0:  12.15 +/- 0.01  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.3:  12.42 +/- 0.02  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:54:41.46 -09:31:47.0: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1193 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1374 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20257_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20257_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    9.12    00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.4   1198 6074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    9.09    00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2   1200 6076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20403_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20403_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    12.12    00:54:41.46 -09:31:47.0   5285 3475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.12    00:54:41.46 -09:31:46.9   5287 3478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20404_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 20404_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    12.14    00:57:31.67 -07:35:30.3   5642 4665   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.14    00:57:31.68 -07:35:30.3   5644 4668   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02190_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 02190_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    10.32    00:24:03.75 -09:19:41.1   0716 3290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:24:03.75 -09:19:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1'  15.7(deg)x10.5(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0753 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Image size: 940.9'x626.7'  15.7(deg)x10.4(deg)  9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28 J2000 4789.000 3195.000 
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:51:25.673 -10:00:21.48
Second-epoch image center 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0737 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  00:51:14.363 -09:56:48.16
Second-epoch second image center 00:51:13.650 -09:57:04.28
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00535 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a2Zf7G3N33
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kK8KT72wEZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits &> /tmp/tmp.y2skMu0V9X
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4I50hfbJgL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits and wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.789500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.789500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.58
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.21

Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:


Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 26253 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8317 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3222 to -4.5543 deg
Loaded 3954 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3110 out of 3352 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3352 out of 26253 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (aperture=5.0)
Read 25987 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 4.8346 to 21.0419 deg, Dec -15.3332 to -4.5616 deg
Loaded 3957 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3129 out of 3354 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3354 out of 25987 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits via Tycho-2

Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits:


Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 187 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
 2.9 pix  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.2 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
 15.2 mag.  Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
 14.9 mag.  fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.9 (SNR )  14.3 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.a2Zf7G3N33 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1010, bad_region=3, passed=26243
Got 26243 stars (including 25198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26243 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4896 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4898 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4896 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26243 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4896 stars left (next iteration limit 5385)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits N_match=4896 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.303 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.233 n_q1=1164 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1215 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.155
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kK8KT72wEZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=998, bad_region=3, passed=25977
Got 25977 stars (including 24935 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4898 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 429 (Dec -15.3 to -4.6)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4900 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4898 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 25977 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 4898 stars left (next iteration limit 5387)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits N_match=4898 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.253 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.301 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.255 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.235 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.226 n_q1=1165 n_q2=1283 n_q3=1216 n_q4=1234 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.186
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits -region wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.y2skMu0V9X (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=722, bad_region=41, passed=22267
Got 22267 stars (including 21475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22267 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4887 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4887 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4893 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4886 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4886 stars left (next iteration limit 5375)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=10.496 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.894 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.374 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.382 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4886 robust_rms=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.326 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4886 robust_rms_before=0.941 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.270 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.280 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.331 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.326
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.331 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits N_match=4886 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.268 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.232 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.243 n_q1=1192 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1340 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.208
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4I50hfbJgL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat 
Excluding image region:   190.0  1039.0   192.0  1041.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   226.0  1548.0   228.0  1550.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   351.0  1875.0   353.0  1877.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   501.0  5912.0   503.0  5914.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   638.0  5545.0   640.0  5547.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   724.0  2731.0   726.0  2733.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   883.0  1376.0   885.0  1378.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:   901.0  3972.0   903.0  3974.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1151.0   918.0  1153.0   920.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region:  1157.0   135.0  1159.0   137.0  (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions  (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=747, bad_region=43, passed=22359
Got 22359 stars (including 21536 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4891 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.5 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4895 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4891 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22359 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 4891 stars left (next iteration limit 5380)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=10.634 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.830 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.370 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.384 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4891 robust_rms=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.343 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4891 robust_rms_before=0.927 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.275 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.284 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.347 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.343
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.347 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits N_match=4891 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.273 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.332 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.307 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.234 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.244 n_q1=1193 n_q2=1156 n_q3=1344 n_q4=1198 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.216
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/wcs_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:20:37.09 -09:14:09.3:  14.51 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:20:37.09 -09:14:09.3:  14.16 +/- 0.10  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3:  99.00 +/- 99.00  edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.28 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:20:37.09 -09:14:09.3: ref_mag=14.28 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4251 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0:  15.99 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0:  15.91 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0:  15.88 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5:  15.69 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:05:04.54 -06:12:49.1:  14.56 +/- 0.11  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:21:06.07 -10:00:41.6:  14.79 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5:  15.62 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:52.95 -06:55:56.5:  14.94 +/- 0.18  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:05:04.54 -06:12:49.1:  14.69 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:21:06.07 -10:00:41.6:  14.57 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.61 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:05:04.54 -06:12:49.1: ref_mag=14.61 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4204 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:21:06.07 -10:00:41.6: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2309 delta=0.43 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:52.95 -06:55:56.5:  14.83 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:52.95 -06:55:56.5: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5645 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:19:15.56 -06:11:11.0:  14.75 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:34:44.42 -05:49:06.0:  14.66 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:10:30.55 -11:26:52.0:  15.19 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:19:15.56 -06:11:11.0:  14.75 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:19:15.56 -06:11:11.0: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5580 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:34:44.42 -05:49:06.0:  14.45 +/- 0.12  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.6:  14.69 +/- 0.14  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.54 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:10:30.55 -11:26:52.0:  15.18 +/- 0.21  detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:34:44.42 -05:49:06.0: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.6160 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:27:48.74 -05:46:05.8:  15.57 +/- 0.34  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.19 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:10:30.55 -11:26:52.0: ref_mag=15.19 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.4327 delta=0.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.6:  14.84 +/- 0.16  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:27:48.74 -05:46:05.8:  15.61 +/- 99.00  upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.75 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 01:17:08.16 -07:19:05.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.6636 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  15.57 +/- 0.34
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:48.74 -05:46:05.8: ref_mag=15.57 +/- 0.34 new_mean_mag=14.6849 delta=0.88 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-46-55_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0069.fits at 00:35:55.55 -10:57:27.7:  14.68 +/- 0.13  detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_20-47-52_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0070.fits at 00:35:55.55 -10:57:27.7:  14.78 +/- 0.15  detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average:  14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:35:55.55 -10:57:27.7: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5871 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32213.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32475.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31598_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31598_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.50    00:20:37.05 -09:14:09.8   0189 3302   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.40    00:20:37.12 -09:14:08.8   0191 3305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.18    00:40:21.27 -05:00:07.8   2976 6079   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:40:21.25 -05:00:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    9.23    00:28:41.29 -04:49:14.3   1198 6074   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    9.21    00:28:41.30 -04:49:14.2   1200 6076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31662_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31662_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    11.03    00:44:32.67 -08:00:57.4   3725 4297   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31709_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31709_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    11.48    00:47:06.47 -12:08:43.2   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31719_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31719_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    11.57    00:31:36.82 -13:15:27.2   2026 1004   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31757_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31757_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    11.96    01:16:15.33 -12:40:48.5   8582 1727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31764_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31764_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    11.99    00:56:59.54 -12:30:16.9   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31778_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31778_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.29    00:48:51.83 -05:26:56.4   4273 5886   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31791_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31791_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.15    00:55:01.36 -14:53:34.6   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31805_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31805_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.25    00:20:47.82 -14:28:33.8   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31810_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31810_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.39    00:26:19.35 -12:16:20.1   1196 1536   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31832_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31832_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.39    00:50:02.02 -15:02:56.3   4798 0111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31845_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31845_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.62    00:55:47.46 -06:19:01.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31859_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31859_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.71    00:50:28.48 -04:52:40.5   4494 6247   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31864_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31864_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.54    00:43:47.41 -12:02:36.6   3770 1869   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:43:47.42 -12:02:36.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31871_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31871_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.66    01:08:53.57 -09:59:01.2   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31891_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31891_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.71    00:25:07.98 -10:38:37.6   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31895_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31895_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.81    00:45:20.83 -06:53:22.7   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31897_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31897_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.60    00:42:26.88 -13:50:49.7   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31937_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31937_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.96    01:13:06.61 -09:12:53.0   8022 3807   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31953_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31953_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.66    01:19:36.57 -14:03:27.3   9118 0903   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31964_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31964_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.20    00:22:14.38 -07:20:03.0   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31974_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31974_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.10    00:21:00.91 -07:39:47.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31980_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31980_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.98    00:23:57.96 -13:06:38.8   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31982_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31982_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.17    00:25:34.82 -05:48:32.3   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31983_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31983_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.12    00:22:37.26 -05:26:30.9   0303 5635   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31984_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31984_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.03    00:21:48.12 -06:51:26.5   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31994_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31994_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    12.98    00:29:35.36 -13:10:51.0   1723 1026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31995_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 31995_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.02    00:24:31.28 -14:25:36.4   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32002_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32002_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.19    00:21:54.08 -08:30:55.4   0349 3757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32014_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32014_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.28    00:28:20.07 -10:11:54.8   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32026_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32026_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.22    00:32:31.03 -10:03:58.8   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32034_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32034_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.33    00:33:29.47 -06:43:51.7   2016 4964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:33:29.48 -06:43:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32042_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32042_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.22    00:26:05.40 -11:04:34.8   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32069_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32069_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.23    01:20:22.73 -09:48:16.0   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32070_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32070_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.31    00:24:09.30 -09:21:41.5   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32075_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32075_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.18    00:20:36.67 -11:07:21.7   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32076_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32076_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.43    00:39:22.34 -13:50:37.2   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32087_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32087_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.38    01:19:41.56 -05:31:07.1   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32093_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32093_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.26    00:25:41.45 -11:27:06.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32099_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32099_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.51    01:21:17.98 -05:43:11.3   9185 5990   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32112_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32112_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.36    01:08:36.30 -12:54:22.7   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32113_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32113_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.51    00:55:48.51 -12:26:39.2   5551 1735   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32115_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32115_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.42    00:24:04.92 -12:36:04.7   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32118_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32118_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.49    00:41:22.03 -05:45:02.9   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32125_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32125_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.37    00:19:36.22 -12:15:40.3   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32127_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32127_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.51    00:51:41.13 -12:46:13.0   4957 1504   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32128_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32128_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.73    01:15:06.90 -05:53:34.3   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32130_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32130_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.44    00:23:00.48 -12:29:15.1   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32134_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32134_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.37    00:56:04.25 -12:36:19.4   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32138_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32138_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.47    00:30:30.00 -14:24:58.8   1913 0287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32139_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32139_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.74    00:32:51.26 -05:38:46.7   1871 5615   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32149_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32149_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.77    00:31:54.18 -06:46:47.3   1779 4918   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32151_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32151_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.69    00:25:57.06 -13:00:36.1   1175 1084   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32152_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32152_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.71    00:30:51.69 -05:25:46.0   1559 5727   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32157_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32157_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.65    01:14:11.35 -08:26:48.7   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32159_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32159_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.56    01:20:11.05 -08:48:18.1   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32180_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32180_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.71    01:22:24.67 -05:34:02.1   9353 6092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32181_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32181_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.56    00:59:09.81 -07:18:36.4   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32186_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32186_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.57    01:20:10.94 -10:03:28.1   9109 3340   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32188_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32188_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.67    00:20:12.84 -12:29:12.8   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32191_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32191_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.67    01:04:37.09 -10:58:51.3   6804 2683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32202_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32202_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.50    01:12:42.87 -12:40:07.6   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32206_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32206_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.73    00:25:25.43 -07:12:28.2   0819 4590   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32207_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32207_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.16    00:33:14.93 -06:26:56.6   1967 5132   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32208_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32208_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.05    00:19:37.22 -11:22:23.3   0147 1995   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32213_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 32213_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32217_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32217_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.37    01:20:15.63 -11:45:07.6   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32227_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32227_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.88    00:41:54.07 -09:00:35.1   3371 3674   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32232_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32232_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.83    01:14:18.55 -05:32:53.3   8112 6041   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32233_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32233_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.85    00:39:25.27 -04:54:47.4   2831 6124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32244_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32244_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.86    00:42:25.48 -05:21:29.0   3302 5882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32247_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32247_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.35    00:56:05.90 -14:51:50.9   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32248_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32248_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.75    01:10:24.34 -12:37:54.6   7710 1724   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32251_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32251_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.93    00:25:31.88 -05:24:52.3   0747 5682   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32252_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32252_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.73    01:08:28.23 -12:31:11.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32254_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32254_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.93    01:02:03.73 -05:09:23.3   6247 6179   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32264_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32264_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.99    00:29:17.72 -08:42:27.0   1475 3725   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32286_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32286_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.83    00:42:06.96 -14:43:15.8   3630 0234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32291_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32291_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.87    01:14:34.50 -08:50:27.0   8233 4043   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32299_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 32299_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32301_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32301_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.02    01:10:21.50 -13:56:31.5   7740 0929   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32312_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32312_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.87    00:33:16.26 -08:52:48.3   2079 3664   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32313_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32313_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.15    00:41:00.69 -11:34:17.4   3342 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32314_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32314_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.82    00:44:54.85 -10:47:02.2   3887 2637   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32316_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32316_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.22    01:09:26.44 -06:36:11.5   7401 5361   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32320_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32320_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.00    01:18:52.60 -09:12:59.5   8892 3843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32337_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32337_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.33    00:26:38.39 -06:01:27.2   0946 5322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32341_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32341_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.75    01:14:13.48 -13:32:35.9   8302 1192   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32342_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32342_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.16    00:33:24.55 -06:43:53.5   2004 4963   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:33:24.62 -06:43:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32343_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32343_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.90    01:13:27.14 -08:48:18.9   8063 4057   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32344_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32344_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.08    00:55:32.35 -07:06:36.1   5331 4941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32345_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.12    00:37:41.55 -05:33:51.7   2598 5712   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32352_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32352_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.34    01:21:40.94 -07:21:25.7   9278 4992   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32355_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32355_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.96    00:25:55.47 -11:13:12.4   1087 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32359_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32359_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.27    01:13:33.00 -05:31:36.4   7996 6048   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32379_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32379_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.14    01:14:12.18 -06:34:45.9   8121 5412   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32386_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32386_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.11    01:12:08.65 -08:54:45.9   7869 3983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32387_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32387_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.11    00:37:39.16 -08:35:19.5   2721 3885   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32394_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32394_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.17    00:28:20.27 -06:11:23.4   1212 5239   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32406_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32406_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.98    00:21:37.32 -11:04:29.8   0434 2202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32407_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32407_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.87    01:14:08.44 -08:58:41.4   8171 3957   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32410_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32410_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.98    00:33:43.26 -07:47:18.9   2098 4327   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32412_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32412_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.15    01:07:26.91 -13:31:06.8   7298 1169   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32415_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32415_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.41    01:14:46.32 -07:01:02.7   8218 5150   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32417_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32417_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.12    00:47:35.63 -13:37:56.7   4389 0947   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32419_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32419_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.10    00:48:11.46 -08:39:45.1   4292 3942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32420_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32420_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.06    00:28:30.11 -08:45:21.3   1358 3687   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32429_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32429_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.02    00:34:23.92 -07:00:13.3   2165 4808   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32432_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32432_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.30    00:57:35.49 -05:00:05.7   5569 6235   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:57:35.29 -05:00:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32443_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32443_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.21    01:16:04.48 -05:19:37.8   8376 6190   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32454_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32454_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.34    00:26:16.63 -07:52:54.4   0981 4191   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32459_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32459_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.26    00:45:38.30 -07:48:31.2   3880 4432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32462_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32462_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.19    00:45:01.54 -09:59:36.5   3873 3113   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32467_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32467_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.35    00:51:36.43 -11:00:56.6   4883 2559   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32474_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32474_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.12    00:40:54.11 -07:13:48.9   3150 4736   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:40:54.08 -07:13:48.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32475_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
Preparing report for the candidate 32475_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32476_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32476_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.28    00:40:23.10 -07:28:59.7   3083 4578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32483_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32483_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.14    00:55:12.33 -10:08:35.4   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32492_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32492_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.30    00:38:41.92 -07:55:07.8   2849 4299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32494_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32494_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.25    01:20:30.86 -08:17:54.8   9120 4411   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32497_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32497_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.45    00:31:10.85 -06:29:48.5   1657 5082   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32501_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32501_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.38    00:45:55.59 -05:33:06.5   3836 5797   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32508_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32508_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.19    01:20:59.83 -11:29:17.9   9265 2475   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32512_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32512_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.19    01:18:55.27 -10:18:04.7   8924 3185   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32513_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32513_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.61    00:54:40.27 -06:50:03.3   5192 5100   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32517_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32517_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.41    01:05:04.76 -06:12:48.7   6731 5560   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.43    01:05:04.31 -06:12:49.4   6732 5562   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32519_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32519_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.34    00:21:06.06 -10:00:42.6   0301 2837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.16    00:21:06.08 -10:00:40.5   0303 2840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32520_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32520_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.14    00:25:11.18 -14:00:24.2   1108 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32522_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32522_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.45    01:06:46.93 -07:58:33.3   7039 4510   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32525_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32525_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.44    01:08:17.37 -06:11:09.7   7216 5605   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32527_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32527_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.26    00:28:43.32 -10:31:26.5   1473 2622   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32529_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32529_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.42    01:10:47.48 -09:39:49.6   7686 3520   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32538_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32538_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.46    00:27:52.99 -06:55:55.7   1177 4781   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.78    00:27:52.91 -06:55:57.2   1178 4783   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32539_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32539_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.37    01:02:31.72 -13:18:42.2   6567 1262   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32540_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.38    01:10:53.19 -06:44:37.2   7623 5287   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32546_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32546_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.27    00:22:13.48 -12:06:11.6   0575 1586   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32548_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32548_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.68    01:09:56.36 -09:31:59.7   7555 3593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32551_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32551_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.62    00:22:52.80 -05:18:38.1   0336 5718   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32552_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32552_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.18    00:52:01.12 -08:56:02.8   4870 3813   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32554_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32554_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.31    00:30:46.13 -12:29:38.6   1867 1456   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32555_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32555_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.89    00:44:22.18 -05:54:10.8   3616 5570   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32557_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32557_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.44    00:33:34.23 -12:24:21.1   2278 1542   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32558_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32558_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.15    00:36:09.69 -12:17:29.3   2656 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32561_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32561_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.31    01:05:32.15 -13:56:44.7   7029 0898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32562_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32562_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.09    01:09:38.32 -08:19:08.7   7477 4324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32565_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32565_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.74    00:44:10.30 -07:22:02.5   3644 4684   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32566_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32566_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.22    01:07:22.68 -10:36:41.0   7203 2925   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32567_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32567_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.12    00:40:00.37 -11:43:38.0   3200 2021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32571_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.55    01:19:15.58 -06:11:11.3   8881 5686   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.57    01:19:15.53 -06:11:10.7   8882 5689   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32572_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32572_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.57    00:34:44.40 -05:49:06.9   2162 5526   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.68    00:34:44.45 -05:49:05.1   2164 5529   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32574_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32574_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.48    00:26:30.87 -14:01:38.7   1306 0473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32575_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32575_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.62    00:40:15.90 -04:57:09.3   2960 6108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32576_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32576_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.43    01:10:30.53 -11:26:52.8   7691 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.44    01:10:30.57 -11:26:51.3   7693 2441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32583_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32583_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.02    01:18:07.41 -14:29:21.6   8907 0633   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32584_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32584_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.48    01:19:39.08 -08:07:59.3   8985 4506   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32587_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32587_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.77    01:18:21.68 -08:42:01.3   8802 4153   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32588_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32588_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.27    01:04:05.64 -08:01:27.9   6638 4460   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32590_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32590_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.47    00:28:14.65 -13:00:47.8   1516 1111   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32594_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32594_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.65    00:27:48.73 -05:46:06.1   1110 5487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.75    00:27:48.76 -05:46:05.6   1112 5490   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32596_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32596_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.67    00:38:25.20 -06:43:20.5   2757 5018   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32601_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32601_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.66    01:17:08.15 -07:19:05.5   8582 4981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.68    01:17:08.17 -07:19:05.7   8584 4984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32602_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32602_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.37    01:19:20.41 -11:03:16.9   9005 2730   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32603_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32603_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.60    00:47:04.34 -06:20:22.0   4038 5331   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32606_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.42    00:52:24.10 -13:48:39.2   5099 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32608_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32608_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.41    00:37:56.93 -09:56:35.9   2822 3073   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32609_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32609_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.73    00:35:42.98 -05:01:27.8   2276 6021   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32612_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.47    00:41:53.34 -13:53:44.0   3564 0732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32614_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32614_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.54    01:21:34.40 -06:08:58.4   9236 5729   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32615_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32615_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.36    00:19:46.49 -11:52:00.9   0195 1697   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32620_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.25    00:40:43.34 -08:03:35.1   3157 4234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32621_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32621_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.35    00:54:15.14 -09:42:18.8   5228 3369   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32622_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32622_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.53    00:52:25.56 -09:44:44.8   4959 3329   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32629_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32629_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.57    00:51:49.05 -10:10:11.3   4884 3069   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32639_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32639_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.53    01:16:04.39 -14:10:42.4   8594 0814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32644_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32644_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.42    01:01:35.78 -14:07:42.3   6456 0761   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32651_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.48    01:01:42.76 -14:03:49.5   6471 0801   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32653_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.55    00:43:13.85 -14:37:22.6   3789 0305   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32654_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32654_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.32    00:40:25.70 -11:52:08.3   3268 1940   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32655_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32655_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.47    00:47:10.69 -13:05:45.4   4308 1267   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32656_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32656_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.72    00:44:35.79 -09:24:44.9   3787 3458   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32660_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32660_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 1     2026 08 18.40837    2461270.90837    14.62    00:35:55.52 -10:57:28.6   2563 2438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-47-53_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0432.fits
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.55    00:35:55.58 -10:57:26.9   2565 2441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32665_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32665_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.36    00:21:52.03 -08:23:57.6   0338 3827   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32687_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 32687_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    14.61    00:56:06.05 -11:54:42.4   5576 2058   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 17817_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    13.51    00:53:29.49 -14:30:34.1   5283 0468   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:53:29.48 -14:30:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11277_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433
The candidate 11277_fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 08 18.40890    2461270.90890    10.44    00:24:03.75 -09:19:41.1   0716 3290   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_045009_TTUQ1b1x1_1687719_K0lMycul/fd_Cet-06-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-48-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0433.fits

**** FOUND  00:24:03.75 -09:19:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0
00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0
00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5
########### Completed Cet-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0
00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0
00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5
###################################################################################
00:54:20.56 -07:34:21.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:58:58.86 -07:11:45.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
00:24:02.23 -08:56:31.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO  ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Nothing to add to the exclusion list ####
The observatory MPC code is V36
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.90837270 -observatory V36
09:13:32.08 +17:32:16.5 Mercury (-1.5mag)
12:37:28.72 -05:56:32.9 Venus (-4.5mag)
06:18:39.11 +23:42:03.4 Mars (1.3mag)
08:52:02.06 +18:06:41.9 Jupiter (-1.8mag)
00:55:23.05 +03:06:05.5 Saturn (0.5mag)
04:12:44.40 +20:59:33.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:15:25.94 +00:08:22.2 Neptune (7.7mag)
20:27:11.54 -23:33:53.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
14:06:20.31 -18:17:29.8 Moon (-9.9mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Aug 18 04:52 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.90837270:
08:52:09.43 +18:06:09.4 Io (6.1mag)
08:52:03.20 +18:06:37.7 Europa (6.3mag)
08:51:50.93 +18:07:32.0 Ganymede (5.6mag)
08:51:43.50 +18:08:04.1 Callisto (6.8mag)
08:49:29.92 +18:12:19.2 Himalia (15.7mag)
08:52:00.11 +18:06:51.1 Thebe (16.6mag)
08:49:07.71 +18:08:53.3 Elara (17.7mag)
08:56:10.65 +17:41:35.6 Pasiphae (17.9mag)
08:54:31.59 +18:19:18.7 Carme (19.0mag)
00:55:34.72 +03:06:00.5 Titan (8.4mag)
00:55:25.56 +03:06:07.0 Rhea (9.7mag)
00:55:54.92 +03:07:00.9 Iapetus (11.1mag)
00:55:38.81 +03:05:46.0 Hyperion (14.4mag)
00:54:32.62 +02:57:59.0 Phoebe (16.4mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 568 Aug 18 04:52 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461270.90837270:
19:49:22.15 -16:57:47.8 JWST
12:00:47.66 +48:21:57.1 Chandra
11:34:39.13 -60:49:35.0 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Aug 18 04:52 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461270.90837270 -observatory V36
03:24:30.27 +18:10:11.5 17.6mag P/1996 R2 (Lagerkvist)
17:59:59.67 -34:31:46.2 14.1mag P/2010 H2 (Vales)
07:03:03.21 -69:18:44.3 17.3mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
06:12:18.49 +33:12:59.5 17.7mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS)
04:11:36.59 +41:20:39.9 17.3mag P/2021 N1 (ZTF)
22:30:05.24 +30:43:19.2 17.3mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS)
06:53:18.41 +26:21:28.7 16.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS)
10:31:01.87 +28:01:12.2 17.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
09:35:40.82 +05:18:26.3 18.0mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS)
15:14:35.90 -12:42:15.2 17.9mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS)
20:57:54.75 +64:41:24.9 17.9mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
15:39:06.08 -13:52:32.1 14.5mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
08:19:10.88 +31:49:08.2 15.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
15:05:50.79 +15:32:33.5 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
18:51:02.05 +43:27:16.7 13.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
20:55:24.25 +49:38:06.3 17.5mag C/2024 R4 (PANSTARRS)
05:22:57.35 -12:53:56.8 15.3mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
07:02:27.36 +22:20:00.5 17.9mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
10:47:25.77 +20:14:02.3 17.1mag C/2025 V2 (Rankin)
13:04:38.81 +01:38:38.1 16.9mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS)
16:06:22.46 +76:45:40.2 16.6mag C/2026 A2 (Bok)
03:09:49.24 +46:19:55.3 17.2mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
11:55:24.19 +09:33:57.8 17.4mag A/2026 E1
22:08:45.04 -31:07:15.3 7.0mag 10P/Tempel
11:35:12.92 -04:03:10.3 16.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann
11:28:24.75 +01:18:35.4 17.4mag 63P/Wild
00:52:42.85 -05:53:40.3 15.4mag 65P/Gunn
05:58:15.37 +20:24:50.9 13.7mag 78P/Gehrels
20:28:59.16 -24:37:36.9 17.5mag 84P/Giclas
03:09:26.31 +14:20:36.9 16.9mag 88P/Howell
08:21:10.25 +26:11:47.6 16.3mag 93P/Lovas
04:35:42.60 +20:51:26.6 17.3mag 112P/Urata-Niijima
06:29:52.14 +28:58:05.3 16.1mag 114P/Wiseman-Skiff
09:42:28.79 +24:50:27.5 14.9mag 123P/West-Hartley
12:04:20.88 -14:08:08.2 17.2mag 124P/Mrkos
05:51:16.09 +21:05:30.6 16.0mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt
06:45:34.84 +18:20:52.7 17.9mag 131P/Mueller
00:00:58.41 +03:13:19.6 17.5mag 139P/Vaisala-Oterma
03:14:00.08 -18:46:41.4 13.1mag 161P/Hartley-IRAS
07:50:41.91 +38:07:02.1 16.0mag 162P/Siding Spring
11:55:49.24 +35:30:16.5 12.0mag 169P/NEAT
03:00:18.57 +09:29:50.1 17.6mag 220P/McNaught
16:47:49.43 -10:50:42.8 17.9mag 235P/LINEAR
20:17:14.85 -52:15:19.0 17.9mag 259P/Garradd
03:51:49.73 +29:19:09.1 15.3mag 260P/McNaught
07:35:46.78 +37:19:38.5 17.3mag 295P/LINEAR
15:14:21.38 +02:00:05.9 17.8mag 391P/Kowalski
09:10:09.30 +17:52:07.0 17.9mag 450P/LONEOS
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.3K Aug 18 04:52 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
00:56:54.35 -35:55:29.40  AT2026wdy  2026-08-5.05 16.08
22:08:07.63 -53:03:58.90  AT2026wek  2026-08-3.82 17.17
14:51:51.34 +66:13:24.60  ASASSN-26ev  2026-08-2.15 14.02
12:06:50.79 -36:16:06.20  SN2026wgm  2026-08-1.73 15.61
16:56:36.90 -59:29:26.00  ASASSN-26er  2026-07-25.82 15.09
01:21:27.83 -10:37:05.00  SN2026vbh  2026-07-25.61 15.97
21:17:31.59 +22:25:50.90  ASASSN-26eq  2026-07-24.37 15.13
18:53:36.89 +16:56:43.60  ASASSN-26ep  2026-07-23.47 -4.06
12:18:47.98 -30:48:47.50  ASASSN-26et  2026-07-22.76 13.98
13:00:47.82 +15:42:17.60  SN2026uwk  2026-07-21.75 16.38
18:52:31.11 -32:28:00.90  ASASSN-26en  2026-07-21.77 14.63
14:42:58.01 -62:32:59.10  ASASSN-26es  2026-07-20.79 15.36
20:12:45.57 -32:53:13.00  ASASSN-26em  2026-07-20.94 16.83
18:54:24.33 -46:11:51.70  ASASSN-26eu  2026-07-20.93 14.86
03:18:56.99 -80:55:10.40  AT2026ugi  2026-07-20.03 17.12
18:43:58.40 +24:22:41.80  ASASSN-26eo  2026-07-19.36 16.16
04:50:01.03 -02:22:33.80  ASASSN-26ej  2026-07-16.17 17.02
18:34:55.28 -31:41:00.90  ASASSN-26ek  2026-07-16.24 15.73
17:07:43.61 -44:21:53.50  ASASSN-26el  2026-07-15.86 16.01
14:45:08.35 +24:13:12.30  ASASSN-26ei  2026-07-16.17 16.46
10:00:46.44 -32:36:31.10  AT 2023mhb  2026-07-14.73 16.67
14:39:37.45 -11:22:36.20  AT 2026unl  2026-07-15.27 17.11
10:49:42.57 -11:25:55.80  ASASSN-26eh  2026-07-14.72 16.58
19:33:53.06 -07:15:00.80  ASASSN-22le  2026-07-14.15 15.5
02:45:40.52 -27:55:30.30  ASASSN-26ef  2026-07-12.35 15.86
23:26:43.80 +04:42:39.70  SN 2026qtn  2026-07-12.22 16.47
02:19:17.26 +28:57:15.40  ASASSN-26ec  2026-07-11.53 2.78
18:31:15.56 -05:34:31.50  AT2026stb  2026-07-11.28 -1.29
13:36:08.24 +23:29:05.00  AT2026pjf  2026-07-10.18 -0.72
17:33:39.82 +04:22:36.70  SN2026pir  2026-07-9.86 -0.66
11:21:41.26 -50:33:36.30  ASASSN-26ed  2026-07-8.8 -1.3
23:41:42.11 +26:29:49.10  AT2026qil  2026-07-9.3 16.15
20:21:30.50 -32:03:40.10  ASASSN-26ee  2026-07-7.22 15.53
19:37:44.09 -05:35:42.80  AT2026ryu  2026-07-7.17 14.88
11:06:55.46 -04:07:04.50  AT2026qqg  2026-07-5.01 16.82
19:07:23.69 -74:13:37.30  AT2026qly  2026-07-5.02 17.31
17:57:43.80 +27:18:40.10  ASASSN-26ea  2026-07-5.07 16.67
19:59:01.43 -32:07:34.30  ASASSN-26eb  2026-07-4.97 15.52
18:46:50.35 -57:44:13.20  SN 2026qqp  2026-07-5.03 -0.92
19:17:31.69 -39:55:29.90  ASASSN-26dz  2026-07-5.14 15.91
19:14:31.37 +12:03:52.90  AT 2026rdg  2026-07-3.43 11.81
04:05:50.09 -70:24:34.40  AT 2026qpr  2026-06-30.4 15.96
13:45:37.49 -05:59:35.80  SN 2026pub  2026-06-30.09 16.01
16:41:15.63 +39:17:14.70  SN 2026pel  2026-06-26.38 16.07
10:14:40.19 -35:38:21.30  ASASSN-26dy  2026-06-25.99 15.63
14:47:21.56 -40:15:51.30  ASASSN-26dv  2026-06-23.03 14.62
13:38:49.79 -77:21:06.70  ASASSN-26dw  2026-06-23.04 16.09
00:59:27.90 +33:08:13.20  SN 2026mke  2026-06-22.39 17.13
11:10:44.73 -30:20:45.50  SN 2026nmv  2026-06-22.06 16.56
21:36:15.68 -21:19:12.50  AT2026oxh  2026-06-22.15 17.14
17:31:38.38 -56:05:51.90  ASASSN-26dx  2026-06-22.02 14.72
14:10:13.44 -38:46:46.10  AT2026pvk  2026-06-22.06 16.53
20:56:47.23 -18:31:05.20  AT2026plb  2026-06-21.31 16.4
15:44:29.68 +21:00:59.30  SN2026ore  2026-06-21.29 17.57
23:50:05.98 -14:01:41.30  AT2026oxl  2026-06-21.52 17.64
17:36:54.73 -18:10:04.20  AT2026ouj  2026-06-20.92 15.15
00:34:04.08 -30:22:09.20  AT2026ntk  2026-06-18.09 17.34
20:49:13.39 +25:17:59.20  ASASSN-26du  2026-06-15.39 15.93
23:09:30.84 +32:40:42.00  SN2026oxc  2026-06-14.35 16.83
02:02:26.67 +32:04:22.70  AT2026ovz  2026-06-14.6 15.52
21:26:28.11 -72:31:19.50  AT2026nwc  2026-06-11 17.05
17:54:57.33 +26:32:34.20  SN 2026odc  2026-06-11.23 17.62
13:55:59.94 +17:30:37.20  SN 2026nyq  2026-06-11.1 16.24
00:50:45.14 -71:38:36.90  ASASSN-26dt  2026-06-11.13 10.22
14:42:19.73 +19:11:35.60  SN2026nyp  2026-06-10.3 16.32
12:23:23.92 +12:56:43.50  SN2026mta  2026-06-8.29 16.69
12:30:18.51 +47:12:33.20  SN2026oao  2026-06-9.32 17.02
10:51:05.21 -42:28:56.60  AT2026nvf  2026-06-8.12 16.75
13:50:22.48 -07:35:00.00  SN2026npn  2026-06-8.02 17.58
00:56:07.17 +43:01:43.20  ASASSN-26dq  2026-06-7.43 13.58
01:07:49.46 +41:59:43.70  SN 2026obc  2026-06-7.43 15.15
21:11:25.22 +14:14:31.90  ASASSN-26dr  2026-06-7.24 16.24
06:21:27.06 -65:16:42.00  ASASSN-26ds  2026-06-2.97 15.02
20:07:38.15 -21:07:05.40  SN2026mho  2026-05-25.18 -1.12
11:29:42.55 +79:01:03.10  AT2026min  2026-05-24.21 16.63
11:44:33.11 -68:48:32.90  ASASSN-26no  2026-05-24.03 8.35
19:00:42.82 -48:31:01.60  ASASSN-26dp  2026-05-22.31 -3.28
14:23:56.59 -58:37:47.40  ASASSN-26dn  2026-05-20.01 14.59
11:24:54.06 +47:57:01.60  AT2026nma  2026-05-20.29 15.46
21:27:08.58 +33:24:38.10  AT2026lli  2026-05-19.34 15.86
00:31:01.41 -13:38:51.70  AT2026nad  2026-05-19.39 15.34
15:16:06.61 -79:16:32.40  ASASSN-26dm  2026-05-19.03 14.44
11:24:25.21 -59:23:19.10  ASASSN-26dl  2026-05-18.02 13.55
13:45:51.52 -53:16:01.00  ASASSN-26dk  2026-05-18.16 12.96
02:05:49.69 -30:29:09.60  ASASSN-26dh  2026-05-18.43 15.37
17:50:22.87 -39:42:33.90  ASASSN-26dj  2026-05-17.05 15.7
01:13:11.60 -33:25:16.10  ASASSN-26dg  2026-05-13.41 16.8
16:44:31.77 -27:15:18.40  AT2026mhn  2026-05-12.33 15.8
09:46:31.08 -33:41:51.00  ASASSN-26di  2026-05-12.14 14.63
21:23:11.57 -19:09:45.00  AT2026kwu  2026-05-12.26 16.9
14:20:14.30 -30:20:51.90  AT2026ktm  2026-05-12.06 17.21
14:41:39.01 -37:13:46.40  AT2026lkm  2026-05-11.18 16.89
12:59:50.45 -10:58:38.80  SN2026kep  2026-05-9.06 17.5
13:37:29.61 -29:50:30.90  AT2026lkd  2026-05-9.09 17.23
09:46:42.01 -14:52:03.60  SN2026kmo  2026-05-8.99 17.51
15:03:05.28 +22:02:03.40  AT2026lxf  2026-05-8.07 13.88
10:23:49.41 -20:57:25.30  ASASSN-26df  2026-05-8.21 16.52
22:14:40.56 +05:04:51.60  2026lda  2026-05-7.56 16.2
21:35:33.81 -14:05:16.30  ASASSN-26de  2026-05-6.29 14.51
16:21:49.13 -61:36:14.60  ASASSN-26dd  2026-05-5.15 15.93
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Aug 18 04:52 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
09:55:21.28 +69:02:52.6  PNV J09552128+6902526  2026-06-13.933  18.9mag
19:51:21.42 +37:06:40.0  TCP J19512142+3706400  2026-06-17.2942  16.8mag
19:57:03.87 +37:41:46.4  TCP J19570387+3741464  2026-06-18.2638  17.5mag
00:42:32.04 +41:10:28.3  PNV J00423204+4110283  2026-06-26.059  16.6mag
02:19:17.36 +28:57:15.8  TCP J02191736+2857158  2026-07-12.3549  12.5mag
00:44:56.43 +41:57:41.6  PNV J00445643+4157416  2026-07-13.8026  17.98Cmag
00:42:55.36 +41:17:27.0  PNV J00425536+4117270  2026-07-20.1813  17.7mag
20:35:43.64 +61:31:32.9  TCP J20354364+6131329  2026-07-20.5443  14.4mag
21:17:31.48 +22:25:51.0  TCP J21173148+2225510  2026-07-23.5577  14.8mag
00:41:24.04 +40:49:02.8  PNV J00412404+4049028  2026-07-25.0157  18.7mag
00:43:04.26 +41:02:28.6  PNV J00430426+4102286  2026-07-26.1512  20mag
14:51:51.40 +66:13:24.0  TCP J14515140+6613240  2026-07-29.2561  13.5mag
00:43:06.15 +41:22:08.2  PNV J00430615+4122082  2026-07-30.0085  19.4mag
00:41:33.23 +41:10:12.2  PNV J00413323+4110122  2026-08-02.8913  17.1mag
05:21:07.63 +23:38:19.4  TCP J05210763+2338194  2026-08-06.4109  11.2mag
22:57:17.96 +47:07:41.8  TCP J22571796+4707418  2026-08-09.3289  14.3mag
09:13:38.17 +76:28:18.1  PSN J09133817+7628181  2026-08-09.8037  15.4mag
00:43:17.29 +41:26:48.6  PNV J00431729+4126486  2026-08-14.0920  16.8mag
00:42:52.82 +41:10:58.6  PNV J00425282+4110586  2026-08-17.7723  19.9mag
00:42:52.83 +41:10:59.6  PNV J00425283+4110596  2026-08-18.6119  19.3mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 190K Aug 18 04:52 tocp_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of recent TNS transients from https://www.wis-tns.org/ :
20:42:19.872 +11:23:33.24  AT 2026wyg  2026-07-27.36 20.362
22:23:18.161 -03:42:46.81  AT 2026wyf  2026-08-02.43 19.8981
23:01:54.687 -22:43:32.99  SN 2026wye  2026-08-02.38 19.1478
21:53:38.707 -07:26:43.02  AT 2026wyd  2026-08-02.36 19.6168
22:49:50.870 -46:36:08.90  AT 2026wyc  2026-08-03.35 17.2
21:36:41.623 +15:19:50.35  AT 2026wyb  2026-07-18.75 20.3
21:50:57.870 +21:21:44.04  AT 2026wya  2026-07-18.75 20.78
14:05:12.660 -00:47:11.60  AT 2026wxz  2026-08-01.61 20.44
04:58:05.316 +09:12:46.13  AT 2026wxy  2026-07-29.49 17.3027
19:55:18.916 +04:09:22.19  AT 2026wxx  2026-07-23.35 20.806
16:04:20.254 -02:01:58.81  AT 2026wxw  2026-07-05.20 20.2659
18:46:54.548 +16:48:18.74  AT 2026wxv  2026-06-24.31 19.7189
23:46:24.941 +43:49:43.79  AT 2026wxu  2026-07-03.43 19.6427
18:51:17.703 +37:10:07.59  AT 2026wxt  2026-07-04.30 20.0164
01:01:55.949 +41:41:30.57  AT 2026wxs  2026-07-01.41 19.2645
14:20:50.231 +61:16:12.38  AT 2026wxr  2026-07-12.22 19.9923
19:31:40.957 -26:44:38.76  AT 2026wxq  2026-07-24.28 19.6734
13:18:44.218 -20:30:38.57  AT 2026wxp  2026-04-17.43 20.98
12:55:43.929 +27:34:40.69  AT 2026wxo  2026-04-21.42 21.19
10:15:49.208 -16:52:33.53  AT 2026wxn  2026-04-22.26 20.69
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 87K Aug 18 04:52 tns_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Tue Aug 18 04:52:05 CDT 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 3 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 1 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 25s (0.42 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 7s (0.12 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 3s (0.05 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 1s (0.02 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 41s (0.68 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 8 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 11s (0.18 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 9s (0.15 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 1s (0.02 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 11s (0.18 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 36s (0.60 min)
FIELD_Cet-06-Q1b1x1: 90s (1.50 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 94s (1.57 min)
Finished: Tue Aug 18 04:53:39 CDT 2026