This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,6.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 6.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 9.04 06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1
188.06033 1.02062 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 0 1 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,9.04,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 9.04CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 11.03 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7
189.71821 4.85297 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe -0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,11.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 11.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J061837.76+235112.4,2461270.9074,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J061837.76+235112.4 20260818.4074 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 11.99 06:31:19.22 +24:32:34.2
188.79502 6.80152 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.30 Urania -0 0 0 12.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:19.22 +24:32:34.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:19.22 +24:32:34.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,11.99,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 11.99CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 13.03 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6
189.32066 10.44298 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate -1 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6: 15.70 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.70 +/- 0.36
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 13.64 05:55:30.05 +23:25:43.0
185.86507 -0.91891 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.6" and 4.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra -1 -0 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:30.05 +23:25:43.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:30.05 +23:25:43.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4074* 05 55 30.05 +23 25 43.0 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461270.9074,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260818.4074 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461270.9074,13.73,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260818.4074 13.73CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 13.65 06:35:44.81 +19:36:32.6
193.68877 5.49010 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 4.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.308 Polyxo 2 1 2 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:44.81 +19:36:32.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:44.81 +19:36:32.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4074 2461270.9074 13.09 06:18:18.49 +19:27:11.9
191.92330 1.77494 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -1 0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:18.49 +19:27:11.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:18.49 +19:27:11.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4074* 06 18 18.49 +19 27 11.9 13.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,13.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 13.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9074,7.54,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4074 7.54CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461270.90766902 18.08.2026 09:46:52.603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 6 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27933
Objects passed selection criteria: 27892
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 23076.2
Average stars matched: 21913.2 (94.9602 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 255436 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 04:50:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461270.90766902 18.08.2026 09:46:52.603 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 288
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 60 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 179210
Objects passed selection criteria: 178863
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 148506
Average stars matched: 143998 (96.9639 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 577216 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 04:52:19 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.90710494
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0331 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00674 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.99gba1EZz6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AChOj4XQvE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yIAAAljlek
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.w8INwBjHrF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.99gba1EZz6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=0, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 26023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4877 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4818 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4876 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4819 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 29338 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4819 stars left (next iteration limit 5298)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4819 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.370 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.320 n_q1=1143 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1197 n_q4=1239 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AChOj4XQvE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=0, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 28473 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4874 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4816 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4815 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4872 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4817 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4816 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 31529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4816 stars left (next iteration limit 5296)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4816 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.530 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.684 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.485 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.619 n_q1=1184 n_q2=1326 n_q3=1090 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.289
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.yIAAAljlek (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=927, bad_region=0, passed=15922
Got 15922 stars (including 14978 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15922 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4852 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4856 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4792 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 15922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4792 stars left (next iteration limit 5266)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=7.921 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.177 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.585 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.804 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4792 robust_rms=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.740 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4792 robust_rms_before=1.548 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.485 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.486 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.645 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.740
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.645 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=4792 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.625 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.399 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=1362 n_q2=898 n_q3=1495 n_q4=1037 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.298
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.w8INwBjHrF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=945, bad_region=0, passed=16069
Got 16069 stars (including 15108 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16069 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4790 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4793 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4857 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 16069 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5267)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=7.778 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.075 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.562 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.854 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.695 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=1.466 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.486 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.472 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.621 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.695
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.621 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.467 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.617 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.397 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.523 n_q1=1352 n_q2=901 n_q3=1484 n_q4=1052 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.370 worst_q_ratio=1.175
ref2=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.530 worst_q_ratio=1.289
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.298
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits sigma_overall=0.467 worst_q_ratio=1.322
reference average sigma_overall=0.45 worst_q_ratio=1.232
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4819 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4816 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.51 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430_astrometric_residuals.png (4792 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.44 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431_astrometric_residuals.png (4789 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.43 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7: 13.78 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1: 15.73 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1: 15.70 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=11.0230 delta=2.68 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34183.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out34369.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 34168_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:38.04 +17:59:10.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34171_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 34171_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 34183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34363_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 34363_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.68 +24:02:08.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 34369_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 34472_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 34472_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.77 +20:02:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 33107_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.79 +18:15:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 11s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:07:32.51 +22:28:52.1
06:25:34.30 +22:50:14.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0379 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Image size: 944.9'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0331 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:37.902 +21:58:16.63
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:39.317 +21:58:30.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00674 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jDFwBU44bU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1oNiAEdmmW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits &> /tmp/tmp.aoTLjlbqfM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits &> /tmp/tmp.H9dyopeRnU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736100
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736100
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 264 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
2.7 pix fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.2 mag. Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.2 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jDFwBU44bU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=47, blended=31903, bad_region=2, passed=206245
Got 206245 stars (including 174023 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206245 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4833 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4792 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4791 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 206245 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4791 stars left (next iteration limit 5270)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4791 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.296 n_q1=1106 n_q2=1277 n_q3=1178 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.183
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1oNiAEdmmW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=44, blended=29566, bad_region=0, passed=188594
Got 188594 stars (including 158851 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188594 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4841 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4797 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4796 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4797 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 188594 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 4797 stars left (next iteration limit 5275)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4797 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.514 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.647 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.512 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.569 n_q1=1146 n_q2=1371 n_q3=1051 n_q4=1229 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.aoTLjlbqfM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=8147, bad_region=27, passed=100692
Got 100692 stars (including 92391 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 100692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4840 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4783 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4782 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 100692 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5260)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=8.086 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.575 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.600 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.825 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.747 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.540 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.514 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.494 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.642 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.747
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.642 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.507 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.466 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.641 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.549 n_q1=1341 n_q2=868 n_q3=1499 n_q4=1079 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.263
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.H9dyopeRnU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=8175, bad_region=29, passed=101882
Got 101882 stars (including 93543 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 101882 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 944.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 944.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013124 (47.2 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010499 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4842 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4788 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4844 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4789 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 101882 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4789 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=8.211 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.183 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.575 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.882 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4789 robust_rms=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.711 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4789 robust_rms_before=1.459 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.503 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.475 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.652 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.711
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.652 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits N_match=4789 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.621 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.539 n_q1=1341 n_q2=877 n_q3=1487 n_q4=1084 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.264
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0430.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_044814_TTUQ1b1x1_1618653_8UHUXC5j/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:06.11 +23:38:45.0: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:56.27 +19:44:56.4: 14.47 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:39.83 +24:14:23.3: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:20.41 +22:13:13.5: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:58.57 +26:17:32.9: 13.93 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:48:29.20 +19:47:17.3: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:39.83 +24:14:23.3: 13.91 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:20.41 +22:13:13.5: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:56.27 +19:44:56.4: 14.41 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:06.11 +23:38:45.0: 13.37 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:39.83 +24:14:23.3: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7435 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.44 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:20.41 +22:13:13.5: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7374 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.27 +19:44:56.4: ref_mag=14.44 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=13.9407 delta=0.50 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:06.11 +23:38:45.0: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5033 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:25.70 +24:33:07.4: 13.61 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:58.57 +26:17:32.9: 14.24 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:48:29.20 +19:47:17.3: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:58.57 +26:17:32.9: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9849 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:48:29.20 +19:47:17.3: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1709 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:25.70 +24:33:07.4: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.61 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:25.70 +24:33:07.4: ref_mag=13.61 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7436 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:40:02.74 +20:31:08.6: 12.84 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:54:27.48 +21:47:59.4: 13.34 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.6: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:50:26.08 +24:22:22.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:58.33 +25:30:22.4: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:40:02.74 +20:31:08.6: 12.80 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.82 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.6: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:40:02.74 +20:31:08.6: ref_mag=12.82 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7783 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:59:24.60 +23:10:37.6: 12.49 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:59.40 +20:16:21.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1070 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:54:27.48 +21:47:59.4: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:54:27.48 +21:47:59.4: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4566 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:14.92 +17:30:16.4: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:50:26.08 +24:22:22.6: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:50:26.08 +24:22:22.6: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6699 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:58.33 +25:30:22.4: 12.97 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:16:58.33 +25:30:22.4: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0416 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:59:24.60 +23:10:37.6: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.46 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:59:24.60 +23:10:37.6: ref_mag=12.46 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4259 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:14.92 +17:30:16.4: 12.59 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.62 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:14.92 +17:30:16.4: ref_mag=12.62 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6369 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.36 +23:46:07.0: 12.84 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.36 +23:46:07.0: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.36 +23:46:07.0: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1012 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.8: 11.88 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:02.07 +21:22:52.4: 11.60 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.8: 11.73 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.79 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:02.07 +21:22:52.4: 11.53 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:47:49.59 +23:20:54.8: ref_mag=11.79 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.6464 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.56 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:02.07 +21:22:52.4: ref_mag=11.56 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6640 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.7: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.7: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.60 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.64 +20:16:16.7: ref_mag=11.60 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4203 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:31:19.22 +24:32:34.2: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:55:24.12 +20:11:39.9: 11.75 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:31:19.22 +24:32:34.2: 15.89 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:55:24.12 +20:11:39.9: 11.69 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.72 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:55:24.12 +20:11:39.9: ref_mag=11.72 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8852 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:07.10 +19:23:01.8: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:07.10 +19:23:01.8: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.07 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:07.10 +19:23:01.8: ref_mag=13.07 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9487 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:23.49 +26:08:48.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:44.9: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:23.49 +26:08:48.3: 12.88 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:23.49 +26:08:48.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8708 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:56.74 +17:52:42.3: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:44.9: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:44.9: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3225 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:56.74 +17:52:42.3: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:56.74 +17:52:42.3: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2033 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:01.60 +25:48:15.9: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:48.07 +24:59:23.8: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:01.60 +25:48:15.9: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:01.60 +25:48:15.9: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3809 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:24.2: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.0: 13.52 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:48.07 +24:59:23.8: 13.29 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:48.07 +24:59:23.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2144 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:24.2: 13.30 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.29 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.61 +19:26:24.2: ref_mag=13.29 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1823 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:29:16.20 +17:30:35.0: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:29.35 +24:06:35.0: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6: 15.70 +/- 0.36 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.70 +/- 0.36
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:46:47.16 +25:40:17.6: ref_mag=15.70 +/- 0.36 new_mean_mag=13.0251 delta=2.68 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.0: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:22.97 +24:17:46.0: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4046 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:29:16.20 +17:30:35.0: 13.08 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.08 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:29:16.20 +17:30:35.0: ref_mag=13.08 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0297 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:29.35 +24:06:35.0: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:29.35 +24:06:35.0: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0646 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:55:30.05 +23:25:43.0: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:30.32 +25:52:37.9: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:55:30.05 +23:25:43.0: 15.65 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:39.0: 13.47 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:30.32 +25:52:37.9: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:30.32 +25:52:37.9: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4906 delta=-0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:39.0: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:16.42 +23:32:39.0: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3979 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:27:55.37 +17:41:27.7: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:27:55.37 +17:41:27.7: 13.09 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.13 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:27:55.37 +17:41:27.7: ref_mag=13.13 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1779 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.21 +20:15:39.5: 13.41 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:02.25 +24:20:30.5: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:28.89 +23:25:07.2: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:04.13 +23:58:58.6: 13.73 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.21 +20:15:39.5: 13.24 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:02.25 +24:20:30.5: 13.57 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.31 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.21 +20:15:39.5: ref_mag=13.31 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2455 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:02.25 +24:20:30.5: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3631 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:25:31.40 +23:28:41.8: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:28.89 +23:25:07.2: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:28.89 +23:25:07.2: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3344 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:21.48 +26:07:12.8: 13.43 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:14:04.13 +23:58:58.6: 13.75 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:04.13 +23:58:58.6: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5390 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:25:31.40 +23:28:41.8: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.51 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:25:31.40 +23:28:41.8: ref_mag=13.51 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4718 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:21.48 +26:07:12.8: 13.33 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:21.48 +26:07:12.8: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.3456 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:36:13.21 +22:08:50.5: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:57.47 +23:22:22.4: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:36:13.21 +22:08:50.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:57.47 +23:22:22.4: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:36:13.21 +22:08:50.5: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3471 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:57.47 +23:22:22.4: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6413 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:02.09 +22:52:11.8: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:05.86 +21:04:21.5: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:02.09 +22:52:11.8: 13.75 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.78 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:02.09 +22:52:11.8: ref_mag=13.78 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6020 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.2: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:05.86 +21:04:21.5: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:05.86 +21:04:21.5: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6381 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.2: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:37:28.82 +18:57:32.2: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2110 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:44.81 +19:36:32.6: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:44.81 +19:36:32.6: 15.84 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:18.49 +19:27:11.9: 15.86 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:18.49 +19:27:11.9: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out229430.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out231457.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232650.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out232716.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230760_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230760_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230770_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230770_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230773_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230773_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230778_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:48.11 +19:27:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230785_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230786_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230786_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230795_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230803_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230803_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:56.78 +20:11:22.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230808_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230813_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:58.78 +20:56:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230815_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:58:55.76 +26:11:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 230817_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230818_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230818_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230829_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230838_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230838_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:17.07 +25:10:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230841_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:01.41 +24:25:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230842_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230842_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:52.84 +18:21:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230846_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:18.82 +21:54:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230852_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230853_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:23.40 +20:36:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230855_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230859_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:53:19.38 +22:46:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230861_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:27.67 +22:26:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230867_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230867_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230868_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230868_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230869_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230869_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.53 +18:39:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230870_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.90 +25:51:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230871_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230873_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.52 +23:57:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230877_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230877_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:07.50 +23:24:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230878_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230878_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:23.26 +22:16:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:03.08 +25:11:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230881_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230881_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:13.15 +23:55:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230884_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230884_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:52.70 +22:42:49.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230887_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230887_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:51.21 +17:27:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230888_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230888_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230890_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230890_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230892_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230892_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:22.43 +25:34:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230893_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230893_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:47:05.45 +26:33:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230896_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230896_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:59:22.65 +25:14:09.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 230910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 230910_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:32.55 +22:28:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231015_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231015_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231108_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231108_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.66 +24:02:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231127_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231127_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231176_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231176_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.21 +22:21:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231236_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231236_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231242_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231242_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231276_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231276_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231297_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231297_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231311_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231311_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.51 +20:10:37.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231321_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231321_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.90 +25:55:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231366_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231378_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231378_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.29 +22:32:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231379_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231379_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.31 +23:18:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231435_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231435_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231457_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 231457_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231468_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231468_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.52 +21:37:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231545_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231545_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231599_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231599_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231619_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231627_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231627_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231637_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231637_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231662_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231662_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231674_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231674_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:33.10 +22:53:16.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231687_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231687_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.24 +21:52:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231710_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231710_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231753_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231753_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:39.00 +24:26:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231800_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231800_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:40.28 +20:44:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231810_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:51.91 +25:58:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231819_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:11.70 +23:13:19.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231877_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231877_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.39 +19:19:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231880_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231996_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231996_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.60 +24:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 231998_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 231998_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232021_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232021_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:55:22.55 +25:23:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232029_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232029_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.10 +18:15:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232033_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232041_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232064_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232064_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232069_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232079_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232086_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232086_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232100_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232100_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232105_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232105_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:47.48 +25:09:52.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232108_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232108_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.37 +24:36:52.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232111_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232111_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:02.01 +19:21:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232131_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232131_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:18.67 +24:19:21.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232132_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232132_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.56 +23:37:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232133_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232133_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.01 +25:01:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232142_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232142_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.34 +20:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232156_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232156_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232178_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232178_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232183_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.92 +21:10:55.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232192_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232192_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:10.15 +25:47:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232199_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232199_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:51:54.17 +23:37:26.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232203_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232203_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.64 +21:05:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232205_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232230_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232230_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.91 +22:43:14.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232237_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232237_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232250_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232254_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232254_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:11.66 +25:12:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232265_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232265_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232266_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:01.49 +23:19:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232282_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.80 +25:58:47.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232298_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232298_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:02.31 +16:57:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232319_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232319_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:49:09.59 +22:19:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232320_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232320_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.49 +18:11:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232359_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232359_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.67 +23:08:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232364_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232364_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232380_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232380_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232381_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232381_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232390_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232390_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232392_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232392_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.74 +26:22:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232399_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232399_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:19.94 +25:43:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232451_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232451_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:21.00 +18:34:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232463_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232463_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:22.24 +24:13:28.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232470_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232470_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232477_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232477_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232482_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232482_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:33.99 +16:51:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232488_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232488_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:12.47 +23:50:34.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232492_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:27.72 +17:26:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232495_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232495_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232502_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232502_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232510_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232510_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232525_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232525_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:12.63 +17:39:10.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232536_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232536_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232538_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.59 +23:58:06.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232552_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232552_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.38 +22:10:39.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.06 +18:42:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232571_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232571_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232585_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232585_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232620_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232620_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232621_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.52 +20:55:42.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232623_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232623_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232643_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232643_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.33 +19:25:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232647_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232647_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 232650_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232652_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232652_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232659_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232659_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232669_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232669_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232672_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232672_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232678_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232695_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232695_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232700_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232700_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.41 +22:44:28.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232701_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232701_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:24.96 +25:54:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232706_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232706_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:28.45 +17:44:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232716_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 232716_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232720_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232720_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:15.17 +26:30:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232722_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232722_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:45.96 +17:35:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232723_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232723_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232744_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232744_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232773_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232773_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:46.44 +22:32:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232784_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232787_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:06.66 +25:18:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232798_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:17.94 +26:30:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232812_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.83 +18:55:34.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232823_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232823_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:16.85 +22:22:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232831_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:23.43 +19:13:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232836_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232836_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232848_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:12.82 +22:19:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232854_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232860_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:48:20.90 +23:14:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232901_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:16.04 +26:02:02.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232903_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232903_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:50:42.71 +23:41:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232904_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:25.63 +25:31:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232914_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232920_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232920_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:00.14 +26:35:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232923_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232923_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:01:14.23 +23:20:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232929_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232929_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232938_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232938_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232946_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232955_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232955_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 232962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 232962_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:48.87 +21:38:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233000_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 233000_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233024_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233024_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:55.21 +26:27:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233048_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233048_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233059_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233059_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233070_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233070_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:46:07.47 +23:20:57.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233138_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233145_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233145_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:48.30 +22:47:58.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233155_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:59.75 +17:41:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233163_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233163_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233167_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233182_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233182_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233186_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.35 +22:12:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233189_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233189_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233208_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233208_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233225_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233225_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:04.56 +24:56:45.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233239_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233239_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:39.48 +18:19:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233244_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233244_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 233264_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233284_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233284_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233358_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233358_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233367_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233367_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:42.27 +23:27:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233374_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233374_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233386_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233386_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:30.87 +17:27:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233429_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233429_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:16.90 +19:37:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233432_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233432_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:01.49 +23:29:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233434_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233434_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233444_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233444_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233457_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233457_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233470_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233470_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233485_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233485_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:49.84 +19:53:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233491_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233491_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233500_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233500_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233532_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233532_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233556_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233575_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233575_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:50.04 +22:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233578_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233578_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233599_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233599_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233603_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233603_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:54.10 +19:31:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233606_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233606_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233608_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233608_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233625_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233625_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233629_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233629_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233671_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233671_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233707_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233707_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233716_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233716_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233722_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233722_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233735_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233735_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233742_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233742_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233757_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233766_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233766_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233768_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233768_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233769_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233769_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233774_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233777_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233779_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 233790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 233790_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 121256_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:54.36 +22:43:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 47494_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:21:39.27 +19:11:06.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 97583_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:33.62 +21:37:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 161532_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 161532_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:39.02 +18:11:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 110234_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.18 +21:51:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 153572_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:09.77 +24:26:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.46 +19:09:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 229430_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 229430_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 121122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 121122_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:34.31 +22:50:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 25445_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:39.56 +18:05:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 217612_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 217612_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:29.66 +26:03:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 61063_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:57:30.71 +20:02:05.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177178_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 177178_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.80 +18:15:19.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 35533_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:49.23 +18:43:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 89941_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:26.48 +21:22:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 59661_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:33:58.45 +19:53:42.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 113548_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 113548_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:26.19 +20:28:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53517_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
Preparing report for the candidate 53517_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.78 +21:50:56.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431
The candidate 13793_fd_Gem-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-46-52_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0431 did not pass the final checks
