This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4059 2461270.9059 12.09 00:14:36.31 -05:23:53.0
99.31659 -66.56611 galactic Psc Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.106 Dione -0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:36.31 -05:23:53.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:36.31 -05:23:53.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9059,12.09,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4059 12.09CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4059 2461270.9059 12.37 23:47:56.69 -06:53:18.7
83.37101 -64.76439 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.113 Amalthea -0 0 0 12.3 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:56.69 -06:53:18.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:56.69 -06:53:18.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9059,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4059 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4059 2461270.9059 12.38 00:08:22.26 -11:13:55.4
88.37330 -71.15434 galactic Cet Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.118 Peitho -1 -0 1 12.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:22.26 -11:13:55.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:22.26 -11:13:55.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.4059* 00 08 22.26 -11 13 55.4 12.4 U Cet 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9059,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4059 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4059 2461270.9059 13.14 23:42:42.04 -09:55:34.7
76.38200 -66.36719 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.530 Turandot -0 0 0 13.0 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:42.04 -09:55:34.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:42.04 -09:55:34.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9059,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4059 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.4059 2461270.9059 13.39 23:31:26.76 -07:45:43.3
74.86256 -62.90441 galactic Aqr Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 6.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.442 Eichsfeldia -0 0 0 13.4 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:26.76 -07:45:43.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:26.76 -07:45:43.3: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.9059,13.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.4059 13.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461270.90621932 18.08.2026 09:44:47.349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5119
Objects passed selection criteria: 5116
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4770.5
Average stars matched: 4449.25 (93.2659 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 231856 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 04:50:20 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
First image: 2461242.93905227 21.07.2026 10:32:04.116 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Last image: 2461270.90621932 18.08.2026 09:44:47.349 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 56
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 10 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 27819
Objects passed selection criteria: 27738
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.5 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25663.8
Average stars matched: 23272.5 (90.6824 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 249812 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 04:51:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.90559937
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0022 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01118 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CQesyr8kpA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z2gc4hSwYJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dIPuiyrRP8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.N8FjzHgmBf
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.569700
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.569700
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.87
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.70
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0780 deg, Dec -15.2625 to -4.6835 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3165 out of 3236 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3236 out of 4374 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=7.1)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9535 to 8.0779 deg, Dec -15.2626 to -4.6837 deg
Loaded 4197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3202 out of 3251 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3251 out of 4358 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.6 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.3 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
14.7 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.CQesyr8kpA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=278, bad_region=0, passed=4374
Got 4374 stars (including 4092 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4374 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0780, gap 8.0780 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3991 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0777, gap 8.0777 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3993 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3991 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4374 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 3991 stars left (next iteration limit 4390)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=3991 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.348 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.331 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1080 n_q2=969 n_q3=999 n_q4=943 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z2gc4hSwYJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=264, bad_region=0, passed=4358
Got 4358 stars (including 4088 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9535 through 0 to 8.0779, gap 8.0779 to 351.9535
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 3988 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9539 through 0 to 8.0776, gap 8.0776 to 351.9539
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 3990 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 3988 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 3988 stars left (next iteration limit 4386)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=3988 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.291 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.274 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.312 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.280 n_q1=1022 n_q2=971 n_q3=1079 n_q4=916 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.078
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dIPuiyrRP8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=350, bad_region=0, passed=5251
Got 5251 stars (including 4892 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6386 through 0 to 8.1606, gap 8.1606 to 351.6386
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4772 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4768 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6377 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6377
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4769 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4766 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5251 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4766 stars left (next iteration limit 5244)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=11.708 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.045 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.419 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.471 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4766 robust_rms=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.283 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4766 robust_rms_before=1.392 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.259 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.261 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.276 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.283
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.276 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4766 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.272 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.290 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.269 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.245 n_q1=1102 n_q2=1228 n_q3=1184 n_q4=1252 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.N8FjzHgmBf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=344, bad_region=0, passed=5264
Got 5264 stars (including 4914 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6380 through 0 to 8.1601, gap 8.1601 to 351.6380
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.6376 through 0 to 8.1605, gap 8.1605 to 351.6376
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4791 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4787 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5264 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4787 stars left (next iteration limit 5265)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=12.176 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.026 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.368 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4787 robust_rms=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.276 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4787 robust_rms_before=1.069 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.254 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.252 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.270 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.276
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.270 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4787 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.281 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.237 n_q1=1114 n_q2=1237 n_q3=1183 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.071
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits sigma_overall=0.350 worst_q_ratio=1.109
ref2=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits sigma_overall=0.291 worst_q_ratio=1.078
new1=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits sigma_overall=0.266 worst_q_ratio=1.092
new2=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.071
reference average sigma_overall=0.3205 worst_q_ratio=1.0935
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021_astrometric_residuals.png (3991 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490_astrometric_residuals.png (3988 matched stars from wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428_astrometric_residuals.png (4766 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.24 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429_astrometric_residuals.png (4787 matched stars from wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: 11.90 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: 11.89 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.89 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:14:37.61 -07:49:21.0: ref_mag=11.89 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8885 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20259_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 20259_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.42 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 20332_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Image size: 937.6'x624.6' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0022 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 00:00:00.437 -10:00:06.37
Second-epoch image center 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0093 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 00:00:00.077 -10:00:00.66
Second-epoch second image center 00:00:00.839 -10:00:39.29
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01118 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UE8lPxOHh4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fsDpEabQDF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits &> /tmp/tmp.eRDmkRpBH9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0Vb5oABMfC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits and wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.388800
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.388800
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.83
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 22737 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9459 to 8.0985 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4214 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3418 out of 3629 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3629 out of 22737 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (aperture=5.3)
The field straddles RA=0: the RA boundaries wrap around (min > max)
Read 23415 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 351.9462 to 8.0901 deg, Dec -15.2699 to -4.6646 deg
Loaded 4212 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3459 out of 3633 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 3633 out of 23415 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 49 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.4 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
2.2 pix Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.8 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
14.9 mag. Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.UE8lPxOHh4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=913, bad_region=0, passed=22729
Got 22729 stars (including 21779 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22729 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9459 through 0 to 8.0985, gap 8.0985 to 351.9459
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9463 through 0 to 8.0982, gap 8.0982 to 351.9463
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4870 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22729 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4864 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits N_match=4864 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.353 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.355 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.325 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.415 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.337 n_q1=1269 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1176 n_q4=1179 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fsDpEabQDF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=831, bad_region=0, passed=23408
Got 23408 stars (including 22542 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23408 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9462 through 0 to 8.0901, gap 8.0901 to 351.9462
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4860 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.9465 through 0 to 8.0899, gap 8.0899 to 351.9465
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 373 to 428 (Dec -15.3 to -4.7)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4860 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 23408 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4860 stars left (next iteration limit 5346)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits N_match=4860 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.295 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.270 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.305 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.327 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1259 n_q2=1185 n_q3=1245 n_q4=1171 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits -region wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.eRDmkRpBH9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1077, bad_region=39, passed=28844
Got 28844 stars (including 27678 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28844 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5881 through 0 to 8.1745, gap 8.1745 to 351.5881
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4867 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4864 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4864 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5872 through 0 to 8.1744, gap 8.1744 to 351.5872
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5350)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=11.262 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.111 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.415 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.458 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.277 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=1.386 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.257 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.257 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.273 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.277
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.273 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.265 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.288 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1280 n_q3=1174 n_q4=1211 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.086
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0Vb5oABMfC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1041, bad_region=41, passed=28700
Got 28700 stars (including 27559 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5874 through 0 to 8.1973, gap 8.1973 to 351.5874
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4863 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
RA wraps around 0/360 boundary: field RA 351.5870 through 0 to 8.1976, gap 8.1976 to 351.5870
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4863 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 28700 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
Excluding outliers - 4863 stars left (next iteration limit 5349)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=11.589 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.215 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.363 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.396 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4863 robust_rms=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.271 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4863 robust_rms_before=1.073 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.247 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.263 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.271
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.263 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits N_match=4863 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.256 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.251 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.276 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.261 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.231 n_q1=1198 n_q2=1279 n_q3=1170 n_q4=1216 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.080
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-43-53_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0428.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_044608_TTUQ1b1x1_1567973_OFCKqzea/wcs_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:57:51.37 -07:49:34.6: 12.47 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:14:36.31 -05:23:53.0: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:18.6: 13.60 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:57.56 -14:40:51.2: 13.09 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:13:02.63 -05:59:51.9: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2: 12.86 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:55:28.10 -08:53:59.3: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:40.33 -06:46:25.6: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.5: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:47:56.69 -06:53:18.7: 15.42 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:57.56 -14:40:51.2: 13.32 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:18.6: 13.82 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:14:36.31 -05:23:53.0: 15.46 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2: 12.87 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:55:28.10 -08:53:59.3: 14.27 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:40.33 -06:46:25.6: 14.00 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.5: 13.79 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:57:51.37 -07:49:34.6: 12.69 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:13:02.63 -05:59:51.9: 13.99 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.86 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:57.56 -14:40:51.2: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2369 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:35.20 -07:43:44.2: ref_mag=12.86 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3778 delta=-0.51 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:55:28.10 -08:53:59.3: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4076 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:49.63 -08:31:18.6: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2214 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:40.33 -06:46:25.6: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.2915 delta=-0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:57:51.37 -07:49:34.6: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4252 delta=-0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:42:24.61 -06:00:20.5: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.3046 delta=-0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:13:02.63 -05:59:51.9: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2402 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:47:56.69 -06:53:18.7: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:36.26 -07:55:57.9: 11.81 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.3: 12.81 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:42:42.04 -09:55:34.7: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:08:22.26 -11:13:55.4: 15.52 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:26.76 -07:45:43.3: 15.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.9: 13.30 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.1: 12.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:58.28 -08:47:09.1: 13.37 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:42:42.04 -09:55:34.7: 15.41 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:36.26 -07:55:57.9: 12.12 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:26.76 -07:45:43.3: 15.17 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.9: 13.25 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.3: 12.98 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.1: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:08:22.26 -11:13:55.4: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:36.26 -07:55:57.9: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6981 delta=-0.77 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.88 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:52:48.92 -06:31:07.9: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4455 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.93 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:51:01.61 -05:38:20.3: ref_mag=12.88 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4192 delta=-0.53 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:48:06.70 -07:36:48.1: ref_mag=12.93 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3037 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:58.28 -08:47:09.1: 13.57 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:58.28 -08:47:09.1: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0403 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:10.8: 13.84 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:41:53.93 -05:33:11.2: 14.35 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:38:30.05 -13:43:06.4: 14.24 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.2: 13.73 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:40.32 -06:34:00.4: 14.42 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:41:53.93 -05:33:11.2: 14.33 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.2: 13.62 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:10.8: 13.78 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:38:30.05 -13:43:06.4: 14.15 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.34 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:41:53.93 -05:33:11.2: ref_mag=14.34 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2952 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:29:34.44 -05:21:35.2: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9898 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:56:18.90 -09:31:10.8: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0476 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:38:30.05 -13:43:06.4: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0257 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:40.32 -06:34:00.4: 14.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.46 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:40.32 -06:34:00.4: ref_mag=14.46 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3070 delta=0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:29.33 -07:57:25.2: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:26.0: 13.79 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:39:49.46 -04:46:36.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.3: 14.50 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.9: 13.70 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:39:49.46 -04:46:36.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:39:49.46 -04:46:36.6: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:29.33 -07:57:25.2: 13.81 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.3: 14.37 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:26.0: 14.02 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.66 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.88 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:29.33 -07:57:25.2: ref_mag=13.66 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2537 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:35:14.18 -04:49:06.3: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3644 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:10.28 -12:23:26.0: ref_mag=13.88 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.0165 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.9: 13.84 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.76 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:00:47.31 -09:01:10.9: ref_mag=13.76 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0943 delta=-0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:19:58.07 -11:38:24.2: 14.24 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:03.2: 13.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:28:38.54 -13:42:40.1: 14.14 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:52.61 -06:42:22.6: 14.61 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:19:58.07 -11:38:24.2: 14.47 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:52.61 -06:42:22.6: 14.46 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:03.2: 13.98 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:19:58.07 -11:38:24.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1076 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.96 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:52.61 -06:42:22.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.4369 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:31:36.11 -10:20:03.2: ref_mag=13.96 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.1922 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:28:38.54 -13:42:40.1: 14.20 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:31.91 -10:47:03.9: 14.69 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.17 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:28:38.54 -13:42:40.1: ref_mag=14.17 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=13.9236 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:31.91 -10:47:03.9: 14.61 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.64 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:31.91 -10:47:03.9: ref_mag=14.64 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3536 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:30:42.95 -13:59:25.3: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:55.0: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.8: 14.41 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:59:51.15 -13:24:00.5: 13.85 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:30:42.95 -13:59:25.3: 14.47 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:55.0: 14.32 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.8: 14.32 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.29 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:30:42.95 -13:59:25.3: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.0315 delta=0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:37:57.92 -14:09:55.0: ref_mag=14.29 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2665 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:54:09.78 -09:18:47.8: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2573 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:59:51.15 -13:24:00.5: 13.88 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:59:51.15 -13:24:00.5: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1579 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.3: 14.34 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.3: 14.42 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:40:11.35 -13:04:09.3: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3219 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:37.9: 14.48 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:32:27.56 -10:44:47.2: 14.41 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:43:44.62 -14:42:50.0: 13.97 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 23:30:05.29 -13:36:23.0: 14.62 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:37.9: 14.21 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:32:27.56 -10:44:47.2: 14.26 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:43:44.62 -14:42:50.0: 14.36 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:33:35.64 -10:30:37.9: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3139 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:32:27.56 -10:44:47.2: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4282 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.11 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 23:30:05.29 -13:36:23.0: 14.24 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:43:44.62 -14:42:50.0: ref_mag=14.11 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.2297 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.36 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 23:30:05.29 -13:36:23.0: ref_mag=14.36 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.3177 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:58.14 -14:07:51.5: 14.51 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:58.14 -14:07:51.5: 14.50 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:58.14 -14:07:51.5: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.2490 delta=0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:27:30.93 -13:13:11.7: 14.63 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:25:50.88 -14:34:54.1: 14.73 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:36.91 -14:52:39.8: 14.11 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-21_05-32-04_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_1021.fits at 00:26:13.75 -14:48:59.4: 14.71 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:27:30.93 -13:13:11.7: 14.82 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:27:30.93 -13:13:11.7: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3411 delta=0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:25:50.88 -14:34:54.1: 14.61 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:36.91 -14:52:39.8: 14.30 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-07-22_05-26-37_20.00sec_5.00C_LIGHT_0490.fits at 00:26:13.75 -14:48:59.4: 14.27 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.16
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.19 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:25:50.88 -14:34:54.1: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.16 new_mean_mag=14.2575 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:36.91 -14:52:39.8: ref_mag=14.19 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.1096 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 00:26:13.75 -14:48:59.4: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.3001 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32540.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32581.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32604.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32731.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32753.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32402_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32402_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32406_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32407_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32408_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32410_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32416_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32417_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32418_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32454_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32454_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:19:24.43 -08:51:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32540_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32581_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32581_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32597_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32597_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 00:05:10.84 -05:41:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32604_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32604_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32651_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32651_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32731_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32742_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32742_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32753_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
Preparing report for the candidate 32753_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32764_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32764_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32781_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 32781_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33033_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33033_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33037_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33037_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33055_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33055_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33061_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33061_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33065_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33065_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33081_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33081_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33085_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33085_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33099_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33099_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33113_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33113_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33123_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33129_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33129_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33145_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33155_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33155_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33157_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33157_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33173_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33173_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33184_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33184_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33208_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33208_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33218_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33218_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33225_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33225_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33226_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33226_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33229_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33229_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33236_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33236_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33254_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33254_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33263_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33263_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33278_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33278_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33282_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33282_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33425_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33425_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33475_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33549_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33553_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429
The candidate 33553_fd_Cet-05-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_04-44-47_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0429 did not pass the final checks
