This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 21 07.64 +23 38 19.9 9.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461270.8687,9.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260818.3687 9.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 21 07.65 +23 38 19.9 9.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461270.8687,9.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260818.3687 9.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3687 2461270.8687 11.91 05:52:30.28 +24:09:35.4
184.88733 -1.13966 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.22 Kalliope 0 0 0 12.3 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:30.28 +24:09:35.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:30.28 +24:09:35.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 52 30.28 +24 09 35.4 11.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8687,11.91,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3687 11.91CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3687 2461270.8687 13.12 05:10:08.66 +23:05:10.5
180.49764 -9.86849 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 -0 1 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:08.66 +23:05:10.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:08.66 +23:05:10.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 10 08.66 +23 05 10.5 13.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8687,13.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3687 13.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3687 2461270.8687 13.30 05:55:26.84 +23:25:45.4
185.85831 -0.92918 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.7" and 10.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.179 Klytaemnestra 0 -1 1 14.0 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:26.84 +23:25:45.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:26.84 +23:25:45.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 55 26.84 +23 25 45.4 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8687,13.30,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3687 13.30CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3687 2461270.8687 12.20 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3
188.50228 -1.11337 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 10.4 pix
The object was found in VSX 2" ZTF J060028.38+210252.5
Type: SR
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.988 g Y 0.177 g 2458373.65270 44.962411900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 06 00 28.26 +21 02 52.3 12.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J060028.38+210252.5,2461270.8687,12.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J060028.38+210252.5 20260818.3687 12.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3687 2461270.8687 13.32 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0
185.76330 -5.89212 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.8 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" ASASSN-V J053653.25+205631.4
Type: L
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
14.210 V 15.080 V
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3687* 05 36 53.27 +20 56 31.0 13.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ASASSN-V J053653.25+205631.4,2461270.8687,13.32,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ASASSN-V J053653.25+205631.4 20260818.3687 13.32CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461270.86913535 18.08.2026 08:51:23.294 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 11
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 20360
Objects passed selection criteria: 20289
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16212.5
Average stars matched: 15983.8 (98.5891 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 245516 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 03:56:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461270.86913535 18.08.2026 08:51:23.294 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 135
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 48 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 150862
Objects passed selection criteria: 150481
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 113487
Average stars matched: 109854 (96.7992 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 616228 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 03:57:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.86827909
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G8nCeh9lLM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.66lk53izmR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MDk5bOBPsp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PhBsFSD4pD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 11 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
13.9 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.G8nCeh9lLM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=0, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 20487 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4713 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 22997 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4713 stars left (next iteration limit 5184)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4713 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.344 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.276 n_q1=1531 n_q2=718 n_q3=1554 n_q4=910 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.235
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.66lk53izmR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=0, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 18570 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4782 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4717 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4783 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.482 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.603 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.387 n_q1=1527 n_q2=718 n_q3=1564 n_q4=905 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.MDk5bOBPsp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=416, bad_region=0, passed=10638
Got 10638 stars (including 10215 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10638 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4734 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4730 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10638 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 4730 stars left (next iteration limit 5203)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=7.692 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=0.938 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.530 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4730 robust_rms=0.658 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.729 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4730 robust_rms_before=1.914 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.604 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.658 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.716 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.729
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.716 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits N_match=4730 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.590 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.701 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.491 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.585 n_q1=1013 n_q2=1320 n_q3=882 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PhBsFSD4pD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=409, bad_region=0, passed=10686
Got 10686 stars (including 10270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10686 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4724 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4787 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4725 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10686 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4725 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=7.694 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.897 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.761 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.186 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4725 robust_rms=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.709 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4725 robust_rms_before=1.640 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.591 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.658 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.709
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.658 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits N_match=4725 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.601 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.565 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.681 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.450 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.609 n_q1=1016 n_q2=1318 n_q3=870 n_q4=1521 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.235
ref2=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.482 worst_q_ratio=1.251
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits sigma_overall=0.604 worst_q_ratio=1.161
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits sigma_overall=0.601 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.4295 worst_q_ratio=1.243
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4713 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4714 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.45 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376_astrometric_residuals.png (4730 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.55 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377_astrometric_residuals.png (4725 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 11s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 30680_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 30834_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:09.63 +19:28:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 20839_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.14 +17:53:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 15128_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.91 +20:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 11829_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.89 +21:13:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.45 +17:54:31.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 03444_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 14186_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.94 +20:10:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 14300_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.43 +20:22:53.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 14002_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.38 +20:16:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 07308_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.07 +23:15:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Image size: 945.2'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0500 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Image size: 945.0'x626.9' 15.8(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.92"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0378 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:21.510 +21:56:59.68
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:18.944 +21:57:42.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01538 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.liYVcheQo4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rImhMycQYp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AnhGzsO4Lp
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits &> /tmp/tmp.s7hnb7yThN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.32
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.51
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 129 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
3.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
14.2 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.liYVcheQo4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=13, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 145983 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 167940 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.356 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.278 n_q1=1463 n_q2=774 n_q3=1520 n_q4=959 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.232
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rImhMycQYp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=51, blended=20219, bad_region=0, passed=162962
Got 162962 stars (including 142457 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4758 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4712 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4759 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 162962 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5183)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.470 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.591 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.454 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.378 n_q1=1445 n_q2=753 n_q3=1535 n_q4=978 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.258
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.AnhGzsO4Lp (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=3630, bad_region=35, passed=62775
Got 62775 stars (including 59032 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62775 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013128 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010502 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4735 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4729 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4784 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4728 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 62775 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4728 stars left (next iteration limit 5201)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=8.072 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.655 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.941 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.546 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4728 robust_rms=0.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.726 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4728 robust_rms_before=1.891 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.585 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.656 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.701 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.726
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.701 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits N_match=4728 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.688 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.463 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.576 n_q1=1038 n_q2=1264 n_q3=911 n_q4=1515 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.167
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.s7hnb7yThN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=3717, bad_region=37, passed=63206
Got 63206 stars (including 59377 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 63206 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 945.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 945.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013125 (47.3 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010500 (37.8 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4728 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4722 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4781 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4723 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 63206 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4723 stars left (next iteration limit 5194)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=8.022 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.925 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.761 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.168 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4723 robust_rms=0.594 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.713 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4723 robust_rms_before=1.623 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.583 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.594 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.659 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.713
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.659 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits N_match=4723 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.595 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.685 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.447 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.612 n_q1=1036 n_q2=1276 n_q3=888 n_q4=1523 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.150
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-50-09_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0376.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_035256_TTUQ1b1x1_1948422_uidn30lO/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:03:51.96 +25:52:33.3: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:50.90 +24:48:21.1: 14.26 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:41:47.77 +17:49:42.9: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:51:28.09 +18:35:04.6: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:03:36.72 +20:20:16.4: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:52:30.28 +24:09:35.4: 15.83 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:03:51.96 +25:52:33.3: 13.02 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:50.90 +24:48:21.1: 14.18 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:51:28.09 +18:35:04.6: 12.88 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.89 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:50.90 +24:48:21.1: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0551 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.00 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:51:28.09 +18:35:04.6: ref_mag=12.89 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7763 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:03:51.96 +25:52:33.3: ref_mag=13.00 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9547 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:07:15.62 +25:16:12.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:52:30.28 +24:09:35.4: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:03:36.72 +20:20:16.4: 12.85 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:41:47.77 +17:49:42.9: 12.93 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:36.72 +20:20:16.4: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.0009 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:41:47.77 +17:49:42.9: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.6292 delta=0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:07:15.62 +25:16:12.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 edge
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:15.62 +25:16:12.3: at least one reference image reported edge (off-image or aperture/annulus past image boundary); cannot perform the forced-photometry cross-check
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:10:08.66 +23:05:10.5: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:10:08.66 +23:05:10.5: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:02:23.50 +26:25:53.2: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:02:23.50 +26:25:53.2: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.22 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:23.50 +26:25:53.2: ref_mag=13.22 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.7429 delta=0.48 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:28.6: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:28.6: 13.50 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.65 +25:20:28.6: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1786 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:33.1: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:39.56 +22:58:32.7: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:33.1: 13.17 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:59.76 +22:34:33.1: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0390 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:39.56 +22:58:32.7: 13.65 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:39.56 +22:58:32.7: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2948 delta=0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:26.84 +23:25:45.4: 16.09 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:26.84 +23:25:45.4: 15.99 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:55:56.09 +22:51:49.3: 13.34 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:20.8: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:20.8: 13.21 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:55:56.09 +22:51:49.3: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:15.27 +22:50:20.8: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9773 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:55:56.09 +22:51:49.3: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.8135 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3: 13.15 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.10 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:00:28.26 +21:02:52.3: ref_mag=13.10 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1829 delta=0.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:42:54.46 +21:13:24.4: 13.10 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:42:54.46 +21:13:24.4: 13.03 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:42:54.46 +21:13:24.4: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3002 delta=0.76 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0: 14.34 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:33.26 +22:49:45.4: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0: 14.58 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.43 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:36:53.27 +20:56:31.0: ref_mag=14.43 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.3245 delta=1.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:33.26 +22:49:45.4: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:33.26 +22:49:45.4: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.2300 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out190912.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191275.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out191861.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out94138.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out99311.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190568_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190571_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190580_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:54.26 +18:25:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190585_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190595_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:21.95 +23:00:57.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190599_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190611_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190611_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:29.69 +16:41:53.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 190614_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190662_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:58.91 +26:19:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190875_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.17 +22:38:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 190912_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190946_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.85 +23:48:51.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190950_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.87 +25:55:17.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190957_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 190957_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.69 +22:27:24.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191004_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:45.99 +26:25:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191049_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:41.74 +23:02:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191072_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:10.08 +18:33:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191073_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.79 +19:34:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191106_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191106_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.00 +25:05:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191110_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:01.76 +26:45:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191135_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191135_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.90 +26:10:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191203_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.20 +18:59:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191240_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 +20:10:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191250_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191250_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:08.61 +20:02:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191261_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191261_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.65 +22:40:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 191275_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191291_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:32.25 +22:45:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191301_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:08:24.73 +22:03:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191322_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:36.67 +22:27:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191324_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191324_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:21.49 +26:25:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191339_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:03.07 +18:34:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191341_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:48.64 +25:09:13.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191382_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191387_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:52.48 +24:25:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191392_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:40.45 +20:26:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191403_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191406_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.27 +20:53:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191418_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:10.85 +25:24:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191443_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191443_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:41.97 +23:00:07.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191503_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.29 +25:47:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191525_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.31 +20:56:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191554_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.75 +21:46:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191560_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.32 +25:09:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191578_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:37.08 +25:25:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191619_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191623_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:30.73 +18:25:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191627_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.82 +19:32:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191630_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.43 +26:44:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191689_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:02.43 +24:22:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191723_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191725_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191725_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.28 +23:07:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191734_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191734_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.64 +20:05:07.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191768_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.38 +21:24:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191787_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191787_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:46.64 +22:17:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191788_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191788_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.42 +20:09:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191789_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191789_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.09 +24:24:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191830_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.64 +25:22:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191836_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:15.08 +19:35:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.82 +23:11:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191846_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191846_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:42.89 +24:06:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 191861_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 191889_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:49.82 +25:55:21.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 58326_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:07.07 +23:15:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 120138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:10.18 +17:57:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 149124_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:48.54 +19:44:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 62770_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 58778_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:52.75 +23:22:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 62537_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 61658_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.91 +23:05:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 90391_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:56.44 +21:25:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 94138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 94138_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 87989_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:53.44 +21:35:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 82933_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:50.56 +21:45:09.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 145353_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:12.52 +19:30:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 110068_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:01.36 +20:16:26.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 98078_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:16.12 +20:53:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 32345_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:18.04 +24:59:39.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.37 +26:13:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 59493_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:36.81 +23:10:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 93856_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 45018_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:29.19 +24:10:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 158119_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:04.16 +17:07:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 19093_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:43.36 +25:40:38.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 81365_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:40.90 +21:49:48.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 167486_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:33.76 +17:49:53.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 142657_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.77 +19:21:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 114972_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:28.92 +20:02:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 123315_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:20.10 +17:59:47.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
Preparing report for the candidate 99311_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 65420_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:30.74 +22:47:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 66104_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 16522_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:36.11 +25:59:48.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 69780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 69780_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:27.57 +22:20:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:18.17 +20:22:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.51 +17:54:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 109495_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:26.46 +20:22:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 166509_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:44.12 +17:45:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 128442_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:37.90 +18:24:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 65120_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:25.81 +22:48:15.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 118951_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:41.13 +17:53:19.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 153854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:40.79 +16:57:36.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 80276_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:56:11.09 +21:51:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:48.83 +25:25:23.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 49183_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:53:41.40 +23:51:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 91223_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:00.88 +21:13:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 106761_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:15.50 +20:28:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 79132_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:35.88 +21:55:37.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 111854_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:55:48.95 +20:10:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 84793_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:38.23 +21:56:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 96330_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.63 +21:08:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 66296_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:07.26 +22:50:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 105095_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:39.27 +20:41:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 117978_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:12.77 +18:35:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 129379_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:31.59 +18:32:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 101378_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:22.24 +20:52:09.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 39648_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:00.79 +24:33:59.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 116845_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:52:23.32 +19:52:03.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 157917_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:01.70 +17:14:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 160317_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:26.05 +17:23:03.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 155021_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:14.33 +17:03:26.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 155271_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:03.64 +17:02:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 110647_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:22.39 +20:16:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 150783_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:54:56.58 +19:44:58.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 14039_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:57:59.60 +25:57:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 110624_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:55.06 +20:08:18.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 166587_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:26.06 +17:43:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377
The candidate 117642_fd_Tau-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-51-23_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0377 did not pass the final checks
