This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 12 44.56 +20 59 33.1 7.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,7.21,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 7.21CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 11.96 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1
172.30540 -17.53383 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.230 Athamantis 0 0 0 12.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 22 15.28 +24 31 54.1 12.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,11.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 11.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 12 44.56 +20 59 33.1 7.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,7.42,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 7.42CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 12.77 04:13:19.61 +24:07:25.6
171.16786 -19.30521 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.49 Pales -0 0 0 12.9 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:13:19.61 +24:07:25.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:13:19.61 +24:07:25.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 13 19.61 +24 07 25.6 12.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,12.77,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 12.77CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 13.19 05:10:07.52 +23:05:08.4
180.49556 -9.87240 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 3.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.110 Lydia -0 -0 0 13.3 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:10:07.52 +23:05:08.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:10:07.52 +23:05:08.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 05 10 07.52 +23 05 08.4 13.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,13.19,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 13.19CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 13.61 04:20:40.25 +20:49:44.8
174.97030 -20.27022 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.344 Desiderata 0 -0 0 13.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:40.25 +20:49:44.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:40.25 +20:49:44.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 20 40.25 +20 49 44.8 13.6 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,13.61,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 13.61CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 13.81 04:26:11.08 +23:51:52.4
173.45220 -17.30815 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.714 Ulula -1 -0 1 14.1 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:11.08 +23:51:52.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:11.08 +23:51:52.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 26 11.08 +23 51 52.4 13.8 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,13.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 13.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 13.65 04:39:52.10 +17:06:04.5
181.09180 -19.13914 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 4.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.53 Kalypso 0 -0 0 13.6 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:52.10 +17:06:04.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:52.10 +17:06:04.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 39 52.10 +17 06 04.5 13.7 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,13.65,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 13.65CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 14.14 04:08:01.71 +25:34:35.9
169.17654 -19.16257 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 3.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.224 Oceana -1 -1 2 14.0 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:01.71 +25:34:35.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:01.71 +25:34:35.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 08 01.71 +25 34 35.9 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 14.14 04:27:37.96 +26:04:39.2
171.94911 -15.59725 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.359 Georgia -1 0 1 14.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:37.96 +26:04:39.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:37.96 +26:04:39.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 27 37.96 +26 04 39.2 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,14.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 14.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 14.20 04:17:29.72 +21:01:24.8
174.28951 -20.69558 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.2" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.631 Philippina -1 -1 1 14.1 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:29.72 +21:01:24.8: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:29.72 +21:01:24.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 17 29.72 +21 01 24.8 14.2 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.3547 2461270.8547 14.34 04:35:05.02 +24:35:07.5
174.26268 -15.30051 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.1" and 3.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.422 Berolina 1 -1 1 14.8 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:05.02 +24:35:07.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:05.02 +24:35:07.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 18.3547* 04 35 05.02 +24 35 07.5 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.8547,14.34,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.3547 14.34CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461270.85501286 18.08.2026 08:31:03.111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 10815
Objects passed selection criteria: 10791
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9297.5
Average stars matched: 9159.5 (98.5157 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 236888 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 03:39:56 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
First image: 2461049.68987713 09.01.2026 04:33:15.384 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Last image: 2461270.85501286 18.08.2026 08:31:03.111 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 205
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 53 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 76411
Objects passed selection criteria: 76270
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 62175.5
Average stars matched: 60640.5 (97.5312 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 563956 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 03:43:49 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.85448299
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00628 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.IBUY7wSKvH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CYh8taRXzG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iColHxmDEj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6L5rxo7knH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
'tns_transients_list.txt' -> '../tns_transients_list.txt'
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.997400
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.997400
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.50
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2829 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5112 to 78.0902 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2829 deg
Loaded 5180 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3947 out of 4318 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4318 out of 11927 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec +16.4856 to +27.2796 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5314 to 78.0905 deg, Dec 16.4856 to 27.2796 deg
Loaded 5169 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3956 out of 4300 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4300 out of 11076 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
2.1 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
3.0 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.IBUY7wSKvH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=967, bad_region=0, passed=11927
Got 11927 stars (including 10942 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11927 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11927 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.304 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.262 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.246 n_q1=1283 n_q2=1077 n_q3=1448 n_q4=1036 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.251
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CYh8taRXzG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=897, bad_region=0, passed=11076
Got 11076 stars (including 10166 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11076 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4844 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4844 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 11076 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4844 stars left (next iteration limit 5328)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4844 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.456 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.326 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1273 n_q2=1107 n_q3=1409 n_q4=1055 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.297
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iColHxmDEj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=368, bad_region=0, passed=7183
Got 7183 stars (including 6804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4827 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4829 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7183 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4829 stars left (next iteration limit 5309)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=12.619 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.366 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.517 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4829 robust_rms=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.417 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4829 robust_rms_before=1.091 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.360 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.353 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.418 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.417
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.418 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=4829 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.365 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.346 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.425 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.308 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1125 n_q2=1240 n_q3=1167 n_q4=1297 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.166
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.6L5rxo7knH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=351, bad_region=0, passed=7239
Got 7239 stars (including 6881 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7239 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4854 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7239 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=12.554 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.380 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.446 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.481 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4834 robust_rms=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.430 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4834 robust_rms_before=1.047 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.362 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.356 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.425 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.430
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.425 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.362 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.370 n_q1=1119 n_q2=1242 n_q3=1169 n_q4=1304 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.221
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits sigma_overall=0.304 worst_q_ratio=1.251
ref2=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits sigma_overall=0.351 worst_q_ratio=1.297
new1=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits sigma_overall=0.365 worst_q_ratio=1.166
new2=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits sigma_overall=0.362 worst_q_ratio=1.221
reference average sigma_overall=0.3275 worst_q_ratio=1.274
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202_astrometric_residuals.png (4844 matched stars from wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.31 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356_astrometric_residuals.png (4829 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.32 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1: 16.12 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20475.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 20365_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20367_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 20367_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20475_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 20475_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 00826_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 00826_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.09 +26:08:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 04887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:21.53 +22:50:08.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 07981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.47 +20:15:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 10554_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.24 +17:32:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 12s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0151 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Image size: 942.5'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.91"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:36:56.045 +21:59:37.33
Second-epoch image center 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0182 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:36:52.946 +21:59:04.01
Second-epoch second image center 04:36:53.460 +21:58:42.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00628 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AR5RS65Q16
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3o22kOYmSt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gEnDO1JLo9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits &> /tmp/tmp.leoW8bJALT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits and wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.857350
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.857350
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.21
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.65
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 86341 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec +16.4673 to +27.2853 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5065 to 78.1101 deg, Dec 16.4673 to 27.2853 deg
Loaded 5193 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3472 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 86341 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 80651 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec +16.4671 to +27.2945 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 60.5064 to 78.1103 deg, Dec 16.4671 to 27.2945 deg
Loaded 5197 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3489 out of 4349 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4349 out of 80651 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 193 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
1.9 pix Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
2.8 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
2.9 pix fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
15.5 mag. Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AR5RS65Q16 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=6242, bad_region=8, passed=86318
Got 86318 stars (including 79890 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 86318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4857 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4857 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 86318 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4857 stars left (next iteration limit 5342)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits N_match=4857 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.302 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.297 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.254 n_q1=1260 n_q2=1091 n_q3=1439 n_q4=1067 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.279
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3o22kOYmSt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=5759, bad_region=1, passed=80631
Got 80631 stars (including 74709 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 80631 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4855 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4868 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4855 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 80631 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4855 stars left (next iteration limit 5340)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits N_match=4855 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.336 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.338 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.316 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.269 n_q1=1222 n_q2=1136 n_q3=1399 n_q4=1098 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.273
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits -region wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.gEnDO1JLo9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1732, bad_region=33, passed=41768
Got 41768 stars (including 39941 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4860 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4843 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4858 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4843 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41766 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4843 stars left (next iteration limit 5327)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=12.693 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.324 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.480 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.522 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4843 robust_rms=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.419 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4843 robust_rms_before=1.085 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.356 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.352 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.421 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.419
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.421 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits N_match=4843 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.367 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.437 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.374 n_q1=1140 n_q2=1208 n_q3=1209 n_q4=1286 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.190
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.leoW8bJALT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=1723, bad_region=39, passed=41737
Got 41737 stars (including 39921 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41737 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4846 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 530 to 589 (Dec 16.1 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4861 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4846 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 41737 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4846 stars left (next iteration limit 5330)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=12.455 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.355 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=0.447 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.486 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4846 robust_rms=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.429 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4846 robust_rms_before=1.040 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.363 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.357 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.433 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.429
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.433 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits N_match=4846 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.364 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.289 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.382 n_q1=1136 n_q2=1202 n_q3=1212 n_q4=1296 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.209
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-30-17_20.00sec_0.00C_LIGHTs_0356.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-18_CI_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_033253_TTUQ1b1x1_2530447_F9uGoKkl/wcs_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-03-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:03.30 +22:25:16.3: 13.99 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:05:00.37 +17:55:02.8: 13.46 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:30:41.35 +25:10:25.3: 15.05 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:04.08 +22:13:51.1: 13.06 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:57.0: 12.48 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:03.30 +22:25:16.3: 13.91 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:05:00.37 +17:55:02.8: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:30:41.35 +25:10:25.3: 14.93 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:57.0: 12.50 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:04.08 +22:13:51.1: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.95 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:03.30 +22:25:16.3: ref_mag=13.95 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.2273 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.99 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:05:00.37 +17:55:02.8: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4355 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:30:41.35 +25:10:25.3: ref_mag=14.99 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.7084 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:09:08.03 +21:52:57.0: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5383 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:04.08 +22:13:51.1: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1647 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.6: 12.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:13:19.61 +24:07:25.6: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.6: 12.47 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.48 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:21:45.25 +19:28:44.6: ref_mag=12.48 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4066 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:13:19.61 +24:07:25.6: 16.04 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:10.03 +24:08:07.6: 13.05 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:10.03 +24:08:07.6: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:17:10.03 +24:08:07.6: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9662 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 05:10:07.52 +23:05:08.4: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 05:10:07.52 +23:05:08.4: 16.01 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:40.25 +20:49:44.8: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:38:35.50 +17:25:27.7: 13.48 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:40.25 +20:49:44.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:38:35.50 +17:25:27.7: 13.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:38:35.50 +17:25:27.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3931 delta=0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:26:11.08 +23:51:52.4: 16.36 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:41.35 +22:15:34.8: 14.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:26:11.08 +23:51:52.4: 16.21 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:41.35 +22:15:34.8: 13.95 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.00 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:08:41.35 +22:15:34.8: ref_mag=14.00 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0077 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:39:52.10 +17:06:04.5: 16.27 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:20:37.24 +19:15:33.8: 14.08 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:33:31.02 +24:17:43.5: 14.17 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:39:52.10 +17:06:04.5: 16.14 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:20:37.24 +19:15:33.8: 14.13 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.10 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:20:37.24 +19:15:33.8: ref_mag=14.10 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8956 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:33:31.02 +24:17:43.5: 14.11 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.15 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:33:31.02 +24:17:43.5: ref_mag=14.15 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0426 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:10:08.57 +24:06:27.6: 14.25 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:10:08.57 +24:06:27.6: 14.22 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:10:08.57 +24:06:27.6: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.1490 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:08:01.71 +25:34:35.9: 16.13 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:08:01.71 +25:34:35.9: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:27:37.96 +26:04:39.2: 16.29 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:27:37.96 +26:04:39.2: 16.19 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:17:29.72 +21:01:24.8: 16.34 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:17:29.72 +21:01:24.8: 16.15 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:35:05.02 +24:35:07.5: 16.35 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:35:05.02 +24:35:07.5: 16.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-08_22-33-15_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0161.fits at 04:28:58.70 +23:37:01.8: 14.41 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-01-17_23-15-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0202.fits at 04:28:58.70 +23:37:01.8: 14.57 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.47 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 04:28:58.70 +23:37:01.8: ref_mag=14.47 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.5372 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101455.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101778.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101829.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out101936.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102008.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102105.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102127.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102140.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out102218.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 19s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 12s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101177_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101177_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101185_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101186_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101186_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101205_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101205_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101206_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:06:31.38 +22:04:43.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101211_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:57.79 +24:18:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 101213_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101258_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101286_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101286_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:23.69 +19:10:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101291_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101300_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101300_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101319_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101319_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:22:15.28 +24:31:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101322_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101322_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101330_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101337_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101337_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101399_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101399_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101410_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101452_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101452_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:09.72 +22:55:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101455_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 101455_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101457_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101457_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.81 +26:55:00.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101468_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101468_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:29.18 +22:48:44.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101471_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101471_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:47.87 +18:26:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101483_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101488_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101488_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:06.83 +23:48:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101492_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101492_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101505_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101505_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101507_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101507_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101527_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101527_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:38.35 +22:42:09.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101528_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101531_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101533_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101533_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101546_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101546_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101551_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101553_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101562_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101570_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101571_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101579_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101582_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101583_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101586_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101586_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:57.00 +23:57:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101590_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101590_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101597_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101598_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101602_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101602_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101606_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101606_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101615_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101615_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101628_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101628_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101639_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101639_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101649_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101649_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:32.82 +21:00:57.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101663_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101663_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:30.04 +23:18:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101665_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101665_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:40.48 +23:44:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101673_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101673_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:25:20.85 +22:10:32.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101677_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101677_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101678_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101683_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101683_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101684_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:45.30 +19:58:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101687_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:19:30.08 +21:45:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101688_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101688_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101689_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101692_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:19.36 +24:25:49.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101706_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101706_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101707_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101707_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101710_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101727_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:24.64 +22:56:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101747_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101751_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101764_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101764_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101765_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:33.76 +25:48:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101778_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 101778_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101779_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101779_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101781_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101781_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:25.52 +18:42:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101784_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101792_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101792_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101794_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101794_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101801_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101801_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:07.92 +21:31:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101810_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101810_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101813_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:38.98 +23:58:25.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101818_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101818_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 101829_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101831_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101831_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101832_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101832_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101836_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101837_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101837_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101839_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101839_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:16.56 +21:52:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101846_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:52.89 +23:55:43.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101847_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101852_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101852_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101854_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101856_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:28:14.36 +24:06:07.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101858_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101866_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101866_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101887_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101893_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101893_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101919_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101927_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101927_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101930_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101930_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101935_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101935_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101936_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 101936_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101939_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101939_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101945_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101945_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:18.69 +21:23:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101954_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101954_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101957_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101957_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:23:58.64 +24:19:29.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101960_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101960_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101981_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101984_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101986_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101986_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101988_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101989_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101989_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101991_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101991_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101995_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 101995_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102005_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102005_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102008_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 102008_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102009_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102009_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:57.88 +21:03:41.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102013_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102013_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102017_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102017_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102023_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102023_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102027_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102027_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102032_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102032_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102034_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102034_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102042_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102042_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102043_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102045_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102045_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102048_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102048_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102050_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102050_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102056_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102061_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102063_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102063_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102066_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102075_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:34.95 +20:26:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102079_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102083_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102083_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102084_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102085_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102085_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102091_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102091_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102092_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102092_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102097_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102098_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102098_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102102_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 102105_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102110_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102115_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102117_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102117_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102127_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 102127_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102134_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102135_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102138_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102138_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 102140_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102141_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102141_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102144_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102156_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:53.26 +24:49:14.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102167_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102167_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102179_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102179_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102180_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102180_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102181_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102181_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102187_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102190_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102190_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102197_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:28.70 +20:33:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102200_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102208_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102209_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102218_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
Preparing report for the candidate 102218_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102221_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102222_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102223_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102231_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102234_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102234_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102241_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102246_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102247_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102250_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102259_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102261_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102266_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102268_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102268_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102269_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102272_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102277_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102277_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102281_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102281_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 102283_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 102283_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37500_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 37500_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:48.13 +22:39:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 58469_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:46.95 +17:16:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 53022_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:39.85 +20:57:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83878_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 83878_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 70750_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:17:46.05 +18:22:37.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 80328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 80328_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:18.23 +18:20:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 35380_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:21.51 +22:50:08.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 05458_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:07.08 +26:08:16.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 60271_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:25.47 +20:15:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 65103_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:02.23 +17:32:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357
The candidate 15632_fd_Tau-03-Q1b1x1_2026-08-18_03-31-03_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0357 did not pass the final checks
