This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1640 2461270.6640 12.53 16:16:51.07 -11:57:17.0
1.72067 26.69913 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.28 Bellona -0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:51.07 -11:57:17.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:51.07 -11:57:17.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6640,12.53,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1640 12.53CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1640 2461270.6640 12.78 16:22:18.38 -14:12:55.4
0.70005 24.24431 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 0 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:18.38 -14:12:55.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:18.38 -14:12:55.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6640,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1640 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1640 2461270.6640 12.81 16:34:38.21 -06:11:24.1
9.82893 26.62616 galactic Oph Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.258 Tyche -0 -0 0 12.9 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:38.21 -06:11:24.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:38.21 -06:11:24.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6640,12.81,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1640 12.81CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1640 2461270.6640 13.78 15:47:13.09 -13:44:17.6
354.74230 30.94225 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 8.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.269 Justitia -1 0 1 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:47:13.09 -13:44:17.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:47:13.09 -13:44:17.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6640,13.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1640 13.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1640 2461270.6640 13.86 16:00:01.63 -07:45:19.3
2.46112 32.56298 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 8.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.97 Klotho 1 0 1 13.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:01.63 -07:45:19.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:01.63 -07:45:19.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6640,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1640 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461270.66430844 18.08.2026 03:56:26.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 5
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7801
Objects passed selection criteria: 7794
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7207.75
Average stars matched: 7068.5 (98.0681 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234060 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 23:17:55 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
First image: 2461174.84044517 14.05.2026 08:10:04.463 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Last image: 2461270.66430844 18.08.2026 03:56:26.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 96
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 69 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 64002
Objects passed selection criteria: 63849
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 60931
Average stars matched: 58928.5 (96.7135 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 286388 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 23:20:23 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.66368256
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21
Second-epoch second image center 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01397 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QuDnREbSjD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hpbWVmhqaO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zmaDjKpcZU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jSzYYLUqA6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Loaded 5209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4209 out of 8279 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.855250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.855250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.77
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8992 to 252.4575 deg, Dec -15.6003 to -4.3252 deg
Loaded 5209 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4038 out of 4209 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4209 out of 8279 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8990 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6005 to -4.3251 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8990 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6005 to -4.3251 deg
Loaded 5223 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4035 out of 4212 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4212 out of 8296 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
2.2 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
2.1 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.1 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.QuDnREbSjD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=513, bad_region=0, passed=8279
Got 8279 stars (including 7758 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8279 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4907 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4920 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4907 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8279 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4907 stars left (next iteration limit 5397)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=4907 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.337 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.368 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.271 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1253 n_q2=1184 n_q3=1109 n_q4=1361 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.156
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.hpbWVmhqaO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=538, bad_region=0, passed=8296
Got 8296 stars (including 7747 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8296 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8296 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.351 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.354 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.257 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.295 n_q1=1257 n_q2=1189 n_q3=1108 n_q4=1358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.112
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zmaDjKpcZU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=374, bad_region=0, passed=6208
Got 6208 stars (including 5829 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6208 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4911 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4924 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6208 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4910 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=10.167 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.142 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.556 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.621 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4910 robust_rms=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.441 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4910 robust_rms_before=0.909 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.388 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.394 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.447 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.441
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.447 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=4910 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.398 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.442 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.372 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.344 n_q1=1235 n_q2=1176 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1368 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.111
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jSzYYLUqA6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=360, bad_region=0, passed=6268
Got 6268 stars (including 5894 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6268 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4912 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 430 (Dec -15.6 to -4.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4911 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6268 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 4911 stars left (next iteration limit 5403)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=9.997 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.521 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.516 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.586 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4911 robust_rms=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.432 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4911 robust_rms_before=0.882 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.369 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.423 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.432
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.423 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=4911 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.377 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.417 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.428 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.335 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.333 n_q1=1248 n_q2=1177 n_q3=1131 n_q4=1355 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.135
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.156
ref2=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.112
new1=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits sigma_overall=0.398 worst_q_ratio=1.111
new2=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits sigma_overall=0.377 worst_q_ratio=1.135
reference average sigma_overall=0.319 worst_q_ratio=1.134
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162_astrometric_residuals.png (4907 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163_astrometric_residuals.png (4912 matched stars from wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.28 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100_astrometric_residuals.png (4910 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101_astrometric_residuals.png (4911 matched stars from wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.4: 11.92 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.4: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:59.45 -08:07:31.4: ref_mag=11.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8685 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 2s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 20525_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:10.71 -14:10:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 20531_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 20532_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.25 -09:46:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 02078_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:21:24.47 -07:42:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 3s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.0' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0576 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.8' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:17:07.919 -09:59:23.60
Second-epoch image center 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0551 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:16:56.245 -09:57:28.21
Second-epoch second image center 16:16:58.896 -09:56:56.66
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01397 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits &> /tmp/tmp.p5j30oqFci
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PBCfLfCTkb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9eVwhgsPAG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WoYxo9vuXe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits and wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits) and catalog (wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Loaded 5306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3762 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66506 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.698250
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.698250
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.29
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 66506 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8513 to 252.4891 deg, Dec -15.6160 to -4.1921 deg
Loaded 5306 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3762 out of 4283 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4283 out of 66506 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 66556 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 235.8740 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6083 to -4.1791 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 235.8740 to 252.4990 deg, Dec -15.6083 to -4.1791 deg
Loaded 5298 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 3780 out of 4279 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4279 out of 66556 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 90 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
1.9 pix Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
1.8 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
1.9 pix fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
15.3 mag. Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.p5j30oqFci (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66487
Got 66487 stars (including 63074 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66487 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4918 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4918 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66487 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 4918 stars left (next iteration limit 5409)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits N_match=4918 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.309 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.319 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.266 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.285 n_q1=1250 n_q2=1191 n_q3=1117 n_q4=1360 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PBCfLfCTkb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits' -> 'wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=3301, bad_region=1, passed=66529
Got 66529 stars (including 63096 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4922 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4922 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 371 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 66529 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 4921 stars left (next iteration limit 5414)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits N_match=4921 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.314 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.333 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.259 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.290 n_q1=1255 n_q2=1190 n_q3=1119 n_q4=1357 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.094
The image catalog is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits -region wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9eVwhgsPAG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2194, bad_region=11, passed=56459
Got 56459 stars (including 54162 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 56459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4916 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 56459 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=10.017 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.519 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.553 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.608 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.438 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4916 robust_rms_before=0.900 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.384 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.389 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.445 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.438
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.445 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.396 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.440 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.341 n_q1=1244 n_q2=1198 n_q3=1106 n_q4=1368 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.109
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WoYxo9vuXe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=2136, bad_region=16, passed=55832
Got 55832 stars (including 53586 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55832 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4921 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4921 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 372 to 431 (Dec -15.6 to -4.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4933 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4920 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55832 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4920 stars left (next iteration limit 5413)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=9.850 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.415 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.518 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.583 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4920 robust_rms=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.422 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4920 robust_rms_before=0.872 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.367 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.367 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.427 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.422
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.427 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits N_match=4920 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.375 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.414 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.420 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.330 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.322 n_q1=1241 n_q2=1206 n_q3=1113 n_q4=1360 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.120
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-55-32_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_230051_TTUQ1b1x1_3722914_HGqbSJun/wcs_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Sco-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:34.63 -09:55:44.5: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:18.28 -07:44:19.3: 14.78 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:09.22 -07:24:44.8: 14.40 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:30.15 -10:25:55.1: 14.26 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:38:52.92 -07:40:12.9: 14.40 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:13.09 -06:52:08.0: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:33:31.50 -09:20:07.1: 14.49 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:32.51 -10:40:57.5: 14.73 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.4: 15.08 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:34.63 -09:55:44.5: 14.52 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:30.15 -10:25:55.1: 14.36 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:18.28 -07:44:19.3: 14.69 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:44.94 -04:57:25.9: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:34.63 -09:55:44.5: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6010 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.73 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:18.28 -07:44:19.3: ref_mag=14.73 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8493 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:30.15 -10:25:55.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5826 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:13.09 -06:52:08.0: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.54 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:13.09 -06:52:08.0: ref_mag=14.54 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.6212 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:38:52.92 -07:40:12.9: 14.42 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:32.51 -10:40:57.5: 14.49 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:09.22 -07:24:44.8: 14.27 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:38:52.92 -07:40:12.9: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.4717 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:32.51 -10:40:57.5: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5145 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:09.22 -07:24:44.8: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.5819 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.4: 14.90 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:33:31.50 -09:20:07.1: 14.24 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:44.94 -04:57:25.9: 14.17 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:44.94 -04:57:25.9: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.4898 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:29.86 -06:05:37.4: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.6475 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.33 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:33:31.50 -09:20:07.1: ref_mag=14.33 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.6262 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:36:33.52 -14:26:52.5: 13.92 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:46.48 -11:20:38.7: 14.19 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:57.64 -09:11:01.5: 14.21 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:54.51 -07:32:29.7: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:14.03 -13:17:14.2: 14.08 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:24.79 -10:31:06.5: 13.72 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:44:08.39 -11:03:25.0: 13.21 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:54.63 -09:40:09.9: 14.03 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:46.48 -11:20:38.7: 14.20 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:36:33.52 -14:26:52.5: 13.89 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:34:46.48 -11:20:38.7: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3172 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:13.76 -15:14:51.9: 13.92 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:36:33.52 -14:26:52.5: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1568 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:57.64 -09:11:01.5: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.22 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:57.64 -09:11:01.5: ref_mag=14.22 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3063 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:54.51 -07:32:29.7: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:54.51 -07:32:29.7: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0612 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:14.03 -13:17:14.2: 14.17 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:24.79 -10:31:06.5: 13.74 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.12 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:14.03 -13:17:14.2: ref_mag=14.12 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2262 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:44:08.39 -11:03:25.0: 13.20 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:24.79 -10:31:06.5: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9740 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.21 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:44:08.39 -11:03:25.0: ref_mag=13.21 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2622 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:54.63 -09:40:09.9: 14.04 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.04 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:13.76 -15:14:51.9: 13.89 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:54.63 -09:40:09.9: ref_mag=14.04 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.1693 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:13.76 -15:14:51.9: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.1728 delta=0.73 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:06:54.88 -07:42:02.6: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:32.60 -10:27:10.3: 11.13 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:46.21 -07:38:25.6: 10.49 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:06.81 -10:54:13.6: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:18:38.60 -13:45:10.3: 12.43 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:16:51.07 -11:57:17.0: 15.96 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:22:18.38 -14:12:55.4: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:32.60 -10:27:10.3: 11.12 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.13 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:32.60 -10:27:10.3: ref_mag=11.13 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.4291 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:06:54.88 -07:42:02.6: 11.90 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.90 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:54.88 -07:42:02.6: ref_mag=11.90 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0660 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:34:38.21 -06:11:24.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:18:38.60 -13:45:10.3: 12.40 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.41 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:38.60 -13:45:10.3: ref_mag=12.41 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.6599 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:16:51.07 -11:57:17.0: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:46.21 -07:38:25.6: 10.45 +/- 0.00 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:22:18.38 -14:12:55.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:46.21 -07:38:25.6: ref_mag=10.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=10.8236 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:06.81 -10:54:13.6: 12.38 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.37 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:06.81 -10:54:13.6: ref_mag=12.37 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3806 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:34:38.21 -06:11:24.1: 15.79 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:43:42.36 -15:14:29.5: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:59.27 -14:38:20.0: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:43:42.36 -15:14:29.5: 13.16 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:43:42.36 -15:14:29.5: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2143 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:28:58.27 -10:15:08.8: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:45:31.54 -10:54:59.1: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:59.27 -14:38:20.0: 13.36 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:59.27 -14:38:20.0: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4999 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.9: 13.66 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:45:31.54 -10:54:59.1: 13.64 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:45:31.54 -10:54:59.1: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5871 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:28:58.27 -10:15:08.8: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:58.27 -10:15:08.8: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6727 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.64 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:51.95 -07:08:16.9: ref_mag=13.64 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6277 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:47:13.09 -13:44:17.6: 15.58 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:47:13.09 -13:44:17.6: 15.63 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:00:01.63 -07:45:19.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:23.4: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:59:59.14 -07:06:46.2: 14.11 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:00:01.63 -07:45:19.3: 15.95 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:38.43 -12:27:34.2: 13.91 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:23.4: 13.87 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:54:52.39 -14:36:31.4: 13.99 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.91 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.46 -12:08:23.4: ref_mag=13.91 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8196 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:48:58.81 -07:55:53.1: 14.40 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:59:59.14 -07:06:46.2: 14.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:59:59.14 -07:06:46.2: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0552 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:54:52.39 -14:36:31.4: 14.04 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.02 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:52.39 -14:36:31.4: ref_mag=14.02 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.0852 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:38.43 -12:27:34.2: 13.95 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:48:58.81 -07:55:53.1: 14.34 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:58.81 -07:55:53.1: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.2343 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:38.43 -12:27:34.2: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9158 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:17.60 -10:21:36.6: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:19:55.51 -09:32:44.1: 14.28 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:17.60 -10:21:36.6: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:17.60 -10:21:36.6: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.0375 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:48.60 -09:50:40.4: 13.73 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.4: 14.27 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:19:55.51 -09:32:44.1: 14.33 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.30 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:55.51 -09:32:44.1: ref_mag=14.30 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2610 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:48.60 -09:50:40.4: 13.82 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.77 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:48.60 -09:50:40.4: ref_mag=13.77 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.2315 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.4: 14.07 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.16 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:16.26 -11:32:06.4: ref_mag=14.16 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3553 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:52.02 -14:44:37.3: 14.60 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:15:25.37 -11:01:28.7: 14.37 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:52.02 -14:44:37.3: 14.71 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:52.02 -14:44:37.3: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4136 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:31:21.91 -14:55:22.6: 14.75 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:15:25.37 -11:01:28.7: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:25.37 -11:01:28.7: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.3424 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:50.45 -12:18:11.2: 14.48 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:31:21.91 -14:55:22.6: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.82 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:21.91 -14:55:22.6: ref_mag=14.82 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5480 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:13:02.89 -14:53:36.0: 15.14 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:50.45 -12:18:11.2: 14.32 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:50.45 -12:18:11.2: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4576 delta=-0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:13:02.89 -14:53:36.0: 14.87 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:02.89 -14:53:36.0: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5704 delta=0.40 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:05:26.89 -10:10:04.6: 14.53 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:49:09.32 -06:43:01.4: 14.82 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:05:26.89 -10:10:04.6: 14.62 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.57 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:05:26.89 -10:10:04.6: ref_mag=14.57 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.5281 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:49:09.32 -06:43:01.4: 14.94 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:49:09.32 -06:43:01.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.5729 delta=0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:29:55.53 -11:07:36.7: 14.54 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:07:04.63 -14:34:11.2: 14.99 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:29:55.53 -11:07:36.7: 14.68 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:46.65 -08:18:56.0: 14.63 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:55.53 -11:07:36.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5815 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:57:42.18 -14:31:31.4: 14.97 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:07:04.63 -14:34:11.2: 14.92 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:04.63 -14:34:11.2: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7247 delta=0.23 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:57:42.18 -14:31:31.4: 15.04 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:46.65 -08:18:56.0: 14.68 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.01 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:42.18 -14:31:31.4: ref_mag=15.01 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.6259 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.65 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:46.65 -08:18:56.0: ref_mag=14.65 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.6706 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:23:44.06 -12:35:47.2: 15.10 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:23:44.06 -12:35:47.2: 15.34 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:26:51.56 -09:50:41.2: 13.26 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.20 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:23:44.06 -12:35:47.2: ref_mag=15.20 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7297 delta=0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:47:52.01 -05:31:24.8: 15.29 +/- 0.27 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:37.85 -12:49:54.7: 15.09 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:11:05.48 -14:09:02.8: 14.97 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:26:51.56 -09:50:41.2: 13.24 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:25:27.68 -12:00:42.8: 15.29 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:51.56 -09:50:41.2: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.7194 delta=-1.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:46:03.34 -05:41:35.3: 14.77 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:37.85 -12:49:54.7: 14.74 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:47:52.01 -05:31:24.8: 15.14 +/- 0.24 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:11:05.48 -14:09:02.8: 14.99 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:37.85 -12:49:54.7: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.7944 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.21 +/- 0.18
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:47:52.01 -05:31:24.8: ref_mag=15.21 +/- 0.18 new_mean_mag=14.7625 delta=0.44 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.98 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:05.48 -14:09:02.8: ref_mag=14.98 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7584 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:25:27.68 -12:00:42.8: 15.08 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.16 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:27.68 -12:00:42.8: ref_mag=15.16 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.8204 delta=0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:46:03.34 -05:41:35.3: 14.79 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:46:03.34 -05:41:35.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5049 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:40:19.76 -09:01:11.3: 14.88 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.6: 14.39 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:21:36.14 -05:34:00.7: 15.14 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:40:19.76 -09:01:11.3: 14.92 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.90 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:40:19.76 -09:01:11.3: ref_mag=14.90 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6562 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:51:08.82 -14:25:48.2: 14.63 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 15:46:05.00 -13:26:53.6: 15.00 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:21:36.14 -05:34:00.7: 15.33 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:25.37 -12:58:17.1: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:36.14 -05:34:00.7: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.8325 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.6: 14.81 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:42:36.66 -10:10:21.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.7425 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:39:30.26 -10:00:39.4: 14.83 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:51:08.82 -14:25:48.2: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-10-04_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0162.fits at 16:09:39.16 -06:43:34.6: 14.76 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.71 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:08.82 -14:25:48.2: ref_mag=14.71 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7437 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:25.37 -12:58:17.1: 15.18 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.97 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:25.37 -12:58:17.1: ref_mag=14.97 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7819 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 15:46:05.00 -13:26:53.6: 14.80 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:05.00 -13:26:53.6: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5193 delta=0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:39:30.26 -10:00:39.4: 14.95 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-05-14_03-11-00_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0163.fits at 16:09:39.16 -06:43:34.6: 14.86 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.81 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:39.16 -06:43:34.6: ref_mag=14.81 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.8502 delta=-0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.88 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:39:30.26 -10:00:39.4: ref_mag=14.88 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7880 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82662.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82675.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82678.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82771.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82774.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 22s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82524_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82534_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82537_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82538_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82541_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82543_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82551_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82551_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82557_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82560_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82560_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82562_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82562_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82563_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82563_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82568_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82569_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82569_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82574_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82574_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82576_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82580_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82581_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82583_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82583_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82592_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82592_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:18.10 -06:32:32.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82600_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82600_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82603_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82603_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82605_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:50.79 -13:20:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82607_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82607_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82609_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82609_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82610_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82653_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82653_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82654_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82654_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:46:30.60 -12:31:24.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82662_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 82662_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82664_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82673_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82673_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:39:20.38 -08:32:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82675_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 82675_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82678_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 82678_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82704_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82708_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82708_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:16.65 -07:06:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82729_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82734_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82734_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82736_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82736_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:46:41.24 -11:02:39.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82737_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82740_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82740_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82746_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:51:51.08 -11:08:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82762_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82762_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82770_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:45.01 -08:22:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82771_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 82771_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82774_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 82774_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82795_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82795_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82814_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82819_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82826_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82841_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82841_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82843_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82868_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82868_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82874_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82874_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82915_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82916_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82916_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:44:29.89 -14:59:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82924_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82924_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82937_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82937_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82978_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82991_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82991_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:55:13.99 -13:19:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82997_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 82997_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83004_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83017_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83017_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83022_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83022_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83049_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83049_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:40:35.75 -10:42:11.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83051_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83051_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:50:36.87 -11:28:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83059_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83059_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83067_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83067_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83077_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83077_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83096_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83096_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83113_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83113_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83115_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83115_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83124_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83125_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83148_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83149_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83149_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83171_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83171_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83173_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83173_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83179_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83183_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83183_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83186_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83186_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83188_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:38:14.38 -11:20:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83208_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83208_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83228_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83248_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 83256_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 83256_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 32325_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:26:54.25 -09:46:06.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 09726_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:47:48.73 -06:46:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 05644_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:28:51.17 -05:51:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 45628_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 45628_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:59:10.71 -14:10:55.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 17622_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:45:23.15 -07:56:25.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101
The candidate 17754_fd_Sco-01-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-56-26_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0101 did not pass the final checks
