This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 11.39 16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1
352.90783 20.66622 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.21 Lutetia 0 0 0 11.6 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,11.39,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 11.39CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 12.67 16:22:18.21 -14:12:54.0
0.69990 24.24509 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.48 Doris 1 1 1 13.0 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:18.21 -14:12:54.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:18.21 -14:12:54.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,12.67,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 12.67CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 12.93 15:39:33.36 -16:58:54.0
350.57206 29.93925 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 4.7 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.346 Hermentaria 0 0 0 12.8 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:39:33.36 -16:58:54.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:39:33.36 -16:58:54.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,12.93,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 12.93CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 13.03 16:09:48.24 -21:37:31.6
352.51561 21.60863 galactic Sco Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.24 Themis 0 1 1 13.1 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:48.24 -21:37:31.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:48.24 -21:37:31.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 13.64 15:47:12.50 -13:44:13.7
354.74127 30.94472 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.9" and 4.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.269 Justitia 0 0 0 13.7 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:47:12.50 -13:44:13.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:47:12.50 -13:44:13.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,13.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 13.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 14.24 15:51:16.41 -14:50:55.6
354.60308 29.46441 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.8" and 5.0 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.559 Nanon 1 1 1 14.4 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:16.41 -14:50:55.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:51:16.41 -14:50:55.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461270.6560,14.24,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260818.1560 14.24CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 18.1560 2461270.6560 12.64 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4
347.50591 26.94013 galactic Lib Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.3" and 4.5 pix
The object was found in VSX 1" VV Lib
Type: RRAB
# Max. Min./Amp. JD0 Period
12.541 V 13.615 V 2426093.53300 0.478119900000
The object was not found in astcheck.
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VV Lib,2461270.6560,12.64,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VV Lib 20260818.1560 12.64CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461270.65632666 18.08.2026 03:44:56.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 12
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8219
Objects passed selection criteria: 8208
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7358.25
Average stars matched: 7237.5 (98.359 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 234548 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 00:13:59 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
First image: 2461153.90329036 23.04.2026 09:40:34.287 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Last image: 2461270.65632666 18.08.2026 03:44:56.623 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 28 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 65358
Objects passed selection criteria: 65215
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 61749
Average stars matched: 59565 (96.4631 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 287360 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Aug 18 00:15:13 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461270.65576841
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0708 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dTs16QyQe6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.CPGKI6R4RS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sJm7pW8uMQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jgOOWDHquZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.739600
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.739600
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.83
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.91
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3723 deg, Dec -23.5486 to -12.1236 deg
Loaded 6480 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4833 out of 4992 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4992 out of 8924 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=6.1)
Read 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1932 to 248.3722 deg, Dec -23.5485 to -12.1237 deg
Loaded 6479 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4774 out of 4948 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 4948 out of 8615 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=6.0)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 9 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.2 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
2.1 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
14.9 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.dTs16QyQe6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=501, bad_region=0, passed=8924
Got 8924 stars (including 8411 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8924 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8924 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.254 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.277 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.238 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.286 n_q1=1183 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1144 n_q4=1354 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.089
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.CPGKI6R4RS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=529, bad_region=0, passed=8615
Got 8615 stars (including 8079 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8615 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4906 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8615 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5396)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.298 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.300 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.342 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.301 n_q1=1180 n_q2=1209 n_q3=1165 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sJm7pW8uMQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, bad_region=0, passed=6065
Got 6065 stars (including 5670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6065 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4905 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4905 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4926 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4906 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 6065 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4906 stars left (next iteration limit 5395)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=9.250 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.543 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4906 robust_rms=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.420 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4906 robust_rms_before=0.932 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.374 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.384 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.416 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.420
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.416 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits N_match=4906 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.385 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.412 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.421 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.359 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.348 n_q1=1189 n_q2=1225 n_q3=1171 n_q4=1321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.jgOOWDHquZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=395, bad_region=0, passed=5970
Got 5970 stars (including 5571 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4901 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4922 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4901 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 5970 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4901 stars left (next iteration limit 5391)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=9.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=12.751 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.521 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.550 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4901 robust_rms=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.442 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4901 robust_rms_before=0.912 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.385 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.411 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.444 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.442
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.444 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits N_match=4901 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.419 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.446 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.345 n_q1=1160 n_q2=1221 n_q3=1187 n_q4=1333 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits sigma_overall=0.263 worst_q_ratio=1.089
ref2=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits sigma_overall=0.298 worst_q_ratio=1.149
new1=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits sigma_overall=0.385 worst_q_ratio=1.092
new2=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits sigma_overall=0.393 worst_q_ratio=1.133
reference average sigma_overall=0.2805 worst_q_ratio=1.119
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.23 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.27 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088_astrometric_residuals.png (4906 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.34 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089_astrometric_residuals.png (4901 matched stars from wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1: 15.28 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:46:23.14 -19:26:51.7: 11.84 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:46:23.14 -19:26:51.7: 11.91 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1: 15.32 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.87 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:46:23.14 -19:26:51.7: ref_mag=11.87 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.0612 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20449.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20424_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20424_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20427_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:53.71 -20:53:54.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20444_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20444_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.07 -19:20:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20449_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 20449_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20454_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20454_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20459_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.78 -20:08:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20463_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.92 -18:30:17.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20465_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 20465_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.11 -18:41:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 04477_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.71 -18:18:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
16:13:51.00 -21:59:59.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Image size: 941.5'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0638 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Image size: 941.3'x626.9' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 16:00:00.244 -18:00:10.68
Second-epoch image center 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0708 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 15:59:45.732 -17:58:31.25
Second-epoch second image center 15:59:44.558 -17:58:08.57
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00783 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XXIeuhmHyh
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DFBVSmyEKD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5m9k4Ia84i
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7d8aW5zFjt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits and wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.610200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.610200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.08
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 67289 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1619 to 248.4183 deg, Dec -23.6142 to -12.1028 deg
Loaded 6545 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4699 out of 5213 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5213 out of 67289 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (aperture=4.7)
Read 69473 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 231.1615 to 248.4178 deg, Dec -23.6068 to -12.1031 deg
Loaded 6543 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 4678 out of 5218 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 5218 out of 69473 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (aperture=4.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 131 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
2.0 pix Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
1.9 pix fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
15.1 mag. Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
14.8 mag. fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 14.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XXIeuhmHyh (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3233, bad_region=14, passed=67276
Got 67276 stars (including 63934 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67276 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4914 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4914 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 67267 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 4914 stars left (next iteration limit 5405)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits N_match=4914 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.264 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.243 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.263 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.245 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.288 n_q1=1144 n_q2=1259 n_q3=1159 n_q4=1352 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.092
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DFBVSmyEKD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits 574.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3361, bad_region=20, passed=69459
Got 69459 stars (including 65977 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 69459 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 331 to 391 (Dec -23.6 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4932 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69451 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 4915 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits N_match=4915 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.292 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.285 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.323 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.258 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.292 n_q1=1159 n_q2=1234 n_q3=1164 n_q4=1358 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.106
The image catalog is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits -region wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5m9k4Ia84i (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2143, bad_region=3, passed=55885
Got 55885 stars (including 53653 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4915 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4915 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4931 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4916 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 4916 stars left (next iteration limit 5406)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=8.965 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.034 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.501 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.536 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4916 robust_rms=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.413 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4916 robust_rms_before=0.928 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.371 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.380 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.406 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.413
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.406 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits N_match=4916 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.378 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.403 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.422 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.357 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.351 n_q1=1215 n_q2=1248 n_q3=1136 n_q4=1317 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.116
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7d8aW5zFjt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: 190.0 1039.0 192.0 1041.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 226.0 1548.0 228.0 1550.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 351.0 1875.0 353.0 1877.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 501.0 5912.0 503.0 5914.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 638.0 5545.0 640.0 5547.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 724.0 2731.0 726.0 2733.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 883.0 1376.0 885.0 1378.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 901.0 3972.0 903.0 3974.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1151.0 918.0 1153.0 920.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1157.0 135.0 1159.0 137.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 50 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=2201, bad_region=4, passed=55742
Got 55742 stars (including 53444 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 55742 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4928 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4910 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4910 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 332 to 391 (Dec -23.5 to -12.1)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4929 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4912 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55740 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 4912 stars left (next iteration limit 5401)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=8.937 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.920 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.506 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.533 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4912 robust_rms=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.434 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4912 robust_rms_before=0.903 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.382 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.404 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.430 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.434
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.430 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits N_match=4912 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.387 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.400 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.338 n_q1=1208 n_q2=1246 n_q3=1137 n_q4=1321 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.149
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits -region wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-08_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0088.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_224658_TTUQ1b1x1_964433_kJrrVQ1s/wcs_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Lib-04-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:40.57 -13:34:25.4: 13.71 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:00:58.66 -16:33:24.2: 14.23 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:52:05.85 -18:01:39.0: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:08:16.36 -18:56:43.6: 14.46 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:03:37.80 -19:12:51.2: 14.18 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:46.46 -14:52:36.3: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:24.02 -15:36:29.2: 14.09 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:43.12 -14:16:07.4: 13.83 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:07:32.29 -14:06:20.1: 13.87 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:30:52.14 -13:54:00.3: 14.04 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:08:16.36 -18:56:43.6: 14.45 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:46.46 -14:52:36.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:00:58.66 -16:33:24.2: 14.44 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:24.02 -15:36:29.2: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:03:37.80 -19:12:51.2: 14.29 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:43.12 -14:16:07.4: 13.82 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:07:32.29 -14:06:20.1: 14.01 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:40.57 -13:34:25.4: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.31 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.45 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.93 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:46.46 -14:52:36.3: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1974 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:24.02 -15:36:29.2: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1086 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.23 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:08:16.36 -18:56:43.6: ref_mag=14.45 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.5658 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:00:58.66 -16:33:24.2: ref_mag=14.31 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.4555 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:32.29 -14:06:20.1: ref_mag=13.93 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1081 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:43.12 -14:16:07.4: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0647 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:03:37.80 -19:12:51.2: ref_mag=14.23 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3445 delta=-0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.75 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:40.57 -13:34:25.4: ref_mag=13.75 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0251 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:30:52.14 -13:54:00.3: 14.28 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.14 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:30:52.14 -13:54:00.3: ref_mag=14.14 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=14.2294 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:52:05.85 -18:01:39.0: 13.92 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.87 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:52:05.85 -18:01:39.0: ref_mag=13.87 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.2334 delta=-0.36 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:03.39 -16:05:40.7: 13.66 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:35.1: 13.55 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:50:03.01 -13:57:54.3: 13.64 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:36:36.32 -18:02:23.3: 13.77 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:12.48 -19:38:01.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:26.47 -19:01:40.9: 13.53 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:10:33.49 -16:19:59.6: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:40:51.06 -14:54:07.3: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:41:55.88 -15:09:42.1: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:50:03.01 -13:57:54.3: 13.81 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:36:36.32 -18:02:23.3: 13.70 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:03.39 -16:05:40.7: 13.72 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:20:26.47 -19:01:40.9: 13.54 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.72 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:12.48 -19:38:01.0: 13.52 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:50:03.01 -13:57:54.3: ref_mag=13.72 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9872 delta=-0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:36:36.32 -18:02:23.3: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9793 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:03.39 -16:05:40.7: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0124 delta=-0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.52 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:40:51.06 -14:54:07.3: 13.68 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:26.47 -19:01:40.9: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8836 delta=-0.35 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:10:33.49 -16:19:59.6: 13.48 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:12.48 -19:38:01.0: ref_mag=13.52 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7149 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:51.06 -14:54:07.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.0796 delta=-0.46 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:33.49 -16:19:59.6: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.9318 delta=-0.47 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:41:55.88 -15:09:42.1: 13.56 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:35.1: 13.60 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:41:55.88 -15:09:42.1: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.8014 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.58 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:09:30.28 -19:32:35.1: ref_mag=13.58 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7051 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:06:42.77 -22:48:30.1: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:39.35 -19:28:01.8: 13.22 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:06.76 -20:31:24.3: 13.56 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:56:11.04 -21:51:11.7: 13.45 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:03.33 -17:24:25.6: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:14.36 -19:47:30.5: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:11:10.17 -20:26:10.7: 13.51 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:06:42.77 -22:48:30.1: 13.58 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:06.76 -20:31:24.3: 13.62 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:06:42.77 -22:48:30.1: ref_mag=13.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.5940 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:03.33 -17:24:25.6: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:39.35 -19:28:01.8: 13.27 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:56:11.04 -21:51:11.7: 13.54 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:06.76 -20:31:24.3: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.7046 delta=-0.11 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.37 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:03.33 -17:24:25.6: ref_mag=13.37 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6042 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:39.35 -19:28:01.8: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4713 delta=-0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:56:11.04 -21:51:11.7: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6781 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:11:10.17 -20:26:10.7: 13.44 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.47 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:11:10.17 -20:26:10.7: ref_mag=13.47 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.4506 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:44:25.41 -21:19:00.1: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:07:10.56 -20:42:46.4: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:14.36 -19:47:30.5: 13.33 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.28 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:14.36 -19:47:30.5: ref_mag=13.28 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5240 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:16:49.60 -22:17:06.3: 13.13 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:44:25.41 -21:19:00.1: 13.23 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.18 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:25.41 -21:19:00.1: ref_mag=13.18 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3358 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:07:10.56 -20:42:46.4: 13.05 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:10.56 -20:42:46.4: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3026 delta=-0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:16:49.60 -22:17:06.3: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.14 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:16:49.60 -22:17:06.3: ref_mag=13.14 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3442 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:34:50.46 -14:42:43.2: 12.42 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:02:33.93 -16:23:35.2: 12.86 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:14:52.20 -14:51:50.5: 12.56 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:51.56 -13:45:22.9: 12.31 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:34:50.46 -14:42:43.2: 12.45 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:02:33.93 -16:23:35.2: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.44 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:34:50.46 -14:42:43.2: ref_mag=12.44 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.7342 delta=-0.30 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:02:33.93 -16:23:35.2: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0882 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:04.13 -19:01:51.8: 12.06 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:14:52.20 -14:51:50.5: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.56 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:14:52.20 -14:51:50.5: ref_mag=12.56 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9015 delta=-0.34 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:20:51.56 -13:45:22.9: 12.37 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:20:37.29 -16:14:41.0: 11.65 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:51.56 -13:45:22.9: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5881 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:57:58.17 -14:59:06.2: 11.46 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:04.13 -19:01:51.8: 12.01 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.03 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:04.13 -19:01:51.8: ref_mag=12.03 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2330 delta=-0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:20:37.29 -16:14:41.0: 11.68 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.66 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:20:37.29 -16:14:41.0: ref_mag=11.66 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8137 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:57:58.17 -14:59:06.2: 11.49 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.47 +/- 0.00
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:57:58.17 -14:59:06.2: ref_mag=11.47 +/- 0.00 new_mean_mag=11.6654 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:18.21 -14:12:54.0: 15.51 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:39:33.36 -16:58:54.0: 15.69 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:09:48.24 -21:37:31.6: 15.49 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:17:54.32 -13:26:51.3: 13.04 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:39:33.36 -16:58:54.0: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:09:48.24 -21:37:31.6: 15.53 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:18.21 -14:12:54.0: 15.60 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:17:54.32 -13:26:51.3: 13.06 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.05 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:17:54.32 -13:26:51.3: ref_mag=13.05 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1019 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:50.47 -22:18:15.8: 13.64 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:22:29.37 -21:03:14.2: 13.49 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:47:12.50 -13:44:13.7: 15.75 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:40.59 -15:24:42.2: 13.53 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:50.47 -22:18:15.8: 13.67 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.65 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:50.47 -22:18:15.8: ref_mag=13.65 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6082 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:42.13 -22:47:39.1: 13.72 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:22:29.37 -21:03:14.2: 13.56 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:47:12.50 -13:44:13.7: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.53 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:51:40.59 -15:24:42.2: 13.58 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:22:29.37 -21:03:14.2: ref_mag=13.53 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5487 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.56 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:51:40.59 -15:24:42.2: ref_mag=13.56 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6357 delta=-0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:40:02.55 -22:23:41.6: 13.99 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:42.13 -22:47:39.1: 13.77 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.74 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:42.13 -22:47:39.1: ref_mag=13.74 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.6388 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:40:02.55 -22:23:41.6: 14.08 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:43:40.04 -12:42:41.8: 13.76 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.03 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:40:02.55 -22:23:41.6: ref_mag=14.03 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.8305 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:39.57 -18:01:41.5: 13.81 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:43:40.04 -12:42:41.8: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.84 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:43:40.04 -12:42:41.8: ref_mag=13.84 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.9017 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:39.57 -18:01:41.5: 14.01 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:39.57 -18:01:41.5: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9208 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:33:17.52 -21:55:41.1: 14.37 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:42.34 -15:58:05.4: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:33:17.52 -21:55:41.1: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.38 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:33:17.52 -21:55:41.1: ref_mag=14.38 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.0444 delta=0.33 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:28:46.30 -18:11:01.6: 14.65 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:32:05.90 -17:55:41.8: 14.43 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:42.34 -15:58:05.4: 14.36 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:51:16.41 -14:50:55.6: 15.80 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:42.34 -15:58:05.4: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.1304 delta=0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:28:46.30 -18:11:01.6: 14.54 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.59 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:46.30 -18:11:01.6: ref_mag=14.59 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3420 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:32:05.90 -17:55:41.8: 14.39 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:29:47.38 -18:12:39.2: 14.68 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.41 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:32:05.90 -17:55:41.8: ref_mag=14.41 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.2919 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:51:16.41 -14:50:55.6: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:29:47.38 -18:12:39.2: 14.65 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.66 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:29:47.38 -18:12:39.2: ref_mag=14.66 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3880 delta=0.28 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:11.65 -22:24:59.5: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:26:20.01 -13:12:17.7: 14.61 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:26:20.01 -13:12:17.7: 14.60 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:26:20.01 -13:12:17.7: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.4123 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:11.65 -22:24:59.5: 14.50 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.55 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:11.65 -22:24:59.5: ref_mag=14.55 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.3514 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:19:46.75 -14:10:15.1: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:21:40.93 -18:01:33.9: 14.82 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:27:12.60 -13:46:45.1: 14.54 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:28:41.84 -17:19:01.3: 14.86 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:19:46.75 -14:10:15.1: 14.92 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.87 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:19:46.75 -14:10:15.1: ref_mag=14.87 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.4827 delta=0.38 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:21:40.93 -18:01:33.9: 15.20 +/- 0.25 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.15
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:21:40.93 -18:01:33.9: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.15 new_mean_mag=14.3228 delta=0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:27:12.60 -13:46:45.1: 14.27 +/- 0.12 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.37 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:27:12.60 -13:46:45.1: ref_mag=14.37 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.3122 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:28:41.84 -17:19:01.3: 15.06 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.94 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:28:41.84 -17:19:01.3: ref_mag=14.94 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.3979 delta=0.55 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:15:05.65 -14:57:04.6: 14.44 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:10:14.08 -18:09:55.3: 14.41 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:15:05.65 -14:57:04.6: 14.66 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.53 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:15:05.65 -14:57:04.6: ref_mag=14.53 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.5038 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:48:57.74 -16:12:03.4: 14.24 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:12:31.43 -16:03:23.2: 14.62 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:10:14.08 -18:09:55.3: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.51 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:14.08 -18:09:55.3: ref_mag=14.51 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4556 delta=0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:54:09.18 -12:57:50.3: 14.14 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:48:57.74 -16:12:03.4: 14.23 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.24 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:48:57.74 -16:12:03.4: ref_mag=14.24 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=14.3358 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:12:31.43 -16:03:23.2: 14.59 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.60 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:12:31.43 -16:03:23.2: ref_mag=14.60 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5206 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:54:09.18 -12:57:50.3: 14.28 +/- 0.10 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.20 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:54:09.18 -12:57:50.3: ref_mag=14.20 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=14.3518 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:07:03.28 -22:08:17.6: 14.54 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:25:54.17 -13:46:20.4: 14.44 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:07:03.28 -22:08:17.6: 14.51 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.52 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:07:03.28 -22:08:17.6: ref_mag=14.52 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.4377 delta=0.08 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:25:39.02 -16:59:01.3: 14.76 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:25:54.17 -13:46:20.4: 14.40 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:24:21.48 -15:02:59.3: 14.45 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:54.17 -13:46:20.4: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5174 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:24:21.48 -15:02:59.3: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.50 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:24:21.48 -15:02:59.3: ref_mag=14.50 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=14.5324 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:25:39.02 -16:59:01.3: 14.79 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:25:39.02 -16:59:01.3: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=14.5272 delta=0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:31:33.73 -15:54:01.4: 15.39 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:31:33.73 -15:54:01.4: 15.26 +/- 0.30 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:13:46.66 -20:01:34.7: 15.05 +/- 0.22 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.26 +/- 0.30
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:31:33.73 -15:54:01.4: ref_mag=15.26 +/- 0.30 new_mean_mag=14.6176 delta=0.64 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:29:27.70 -14:22:41.3: 14.57 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:04:21.04 -22:45:16.4: 14.57 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:13:46.66 -20:01:34.7: 14.66 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.78 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:13:46.66 -20:01:34.7: ref_mag=14.78 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.5757 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:42:56.85 -16:09:09.2: 15.24 +/- 0.23 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:29:27.70 -14:22:41.3: 14.68 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.62 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:29:27.70 -14:22:41.3: ref_mag=14.62 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.6021 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:18:30.64 -13:50:06.3: 14.38 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 16:10:25.88 -15:40:23.2: 14.76 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:44:28.48 -22:15:06.6: 14.65 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:04:21.04 -22:45:16.4: 14.58 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.58 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:04:21.04 -22:45:16.4: ref_mag=14.58 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=14.2536 delta=0.32 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:42:56.85 -16:09:09.2: 15.37 +/- 0.26 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.29 +/- 0.17
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:42:56.85 -16:09:09.2: ref_mag=15.29 +/- 0.17 new_mean_mag=14.4339 delta=0.86 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:18:30.64 -13:50:06.3: 14.45 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.42 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:18:30.64 -13:50:06.3: ref_mag=14.42 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=14.3122 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 16:10:25.88 -15:40:23.2: 14.91 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.83 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 16:10:25.88 -15:40:23.2: ref_mag=14.83 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.7335 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:45:40.08 -20:19:53.4: 14.88 +/- 0.18 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:44:28.48 -22:15:06.6: 14.90 +/- 0.19 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.75 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:44:28.48 -22:15:06.6: ref_mag=14.75 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=14.4790 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-40-34_20.00sec_-5.00C_LIGHTs_0264.fits at 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:45:40.08 -20:19:53.4: 15.07 +/- 0.21 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.95 +/- 0.14
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 15:45:40.08 -20:19:53.4: ref_mag=14.95 +/- 0.14 new_mean_mag=14.5657 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-04-23_04-42-27_20.00sec_-4.90C_LIGHTs_0265.fits at 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4: 13.59 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 15:39:46.86 -21:00:49.4: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=12.6421 delta=0.95 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out54874.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84630.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84643.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84717.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out84829.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 6s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84420_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84420_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84422_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84422_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84435_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84435_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84439_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84439_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84440_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84448_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84450_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84450_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84451_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84451_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84453_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84453_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84457_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84458_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84459_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84459_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84460_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84462_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84467_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84467_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84468_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84468_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84470_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:55.78 -21:48:23.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84474_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84474_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84475_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84478_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84478_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84479_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84479_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:45:44.89 -20:44:54.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84481_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:27.45 -21:38:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84483_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84483_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84485_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84485_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84488_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84488_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84491_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84492_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84493_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84494_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84494_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:06:42.46 -22:57:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84495_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84497_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:24.91 -21:56:51.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84498_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84498_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:15:26.38 -22:58:23.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84500_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84500_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84502_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84502_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84503_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84503_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84508_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84508_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84510_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84510_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:31:57.07 -22:05:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84511_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84511_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84512_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84512_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:35:05.54 -21:08:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84513_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84513_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84515_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:25:23.09 -20:25:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84518_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84518_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:23:01.58 -21:14:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84520_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84520_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84522_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84522_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84523_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84524_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84524_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:38:09.64 -16:32:41.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84526_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84526_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:04:53.71 -20:53:55.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84537_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84537_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84549_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84549_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:13:50.99 -21:59:59.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84552_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84552_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84557_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84557_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.77 -20:08:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84564_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84564_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:14:21.11 -18:41:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84566_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84566_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:53:58.94 -18:30:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84570_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84570_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84575_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84575_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84577_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84577_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84578_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84578_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84580_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84580_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:19:24.59 -22:21:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84596_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84596_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:59.82 -17:03:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84607_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 84607_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84625_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84625_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:07:56.20 -18:59:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84630_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 84630_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84633_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84633_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:26:46.50 -20:01:11.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84643_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 84643_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84644_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84644_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84647_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84647_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84651_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84651_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84653_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84653_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84666_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84666_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84683_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84683_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84687_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84687_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84689_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84689_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:16:58.86 -23:00:14.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84692_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84692_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84703_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84707_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84707_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:28:10.22 -16:41:39.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84716_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84716_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84717_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 84717_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84723_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84746_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84746_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84747_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84747_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84749_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84749_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84752_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84752_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84754_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84754_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:05:30.85 -19:50:31.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84763_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84763_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:45.34 -19:05:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84770_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84770_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84786_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84788_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84788_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84803_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84803_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:01:43.95 -22:15:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84807_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84807_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84817_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84817_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84829_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 84829_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84836_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84836_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84838_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84838_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84844_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84844_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84854_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84854_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (28.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84860_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84860_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84873_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84873_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84875_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84875_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84878_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84878_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84886_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84886_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84889_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84889_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84908_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84908_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:27:12.53 -20:25:13.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84913_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84913_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84918_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84918_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84919_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84919_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84920_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84920_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84925_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84925_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84934_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84934_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84948_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84948_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84949_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84949_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84964_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84964_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84967_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84967_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84978_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84978_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 84986_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 84986_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85001_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85001_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85008_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85008_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85024_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85024_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85029_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85029_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85034_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85034_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85043_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85043_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85063_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 85063_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
Preparing report for the candidate 54874_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 55365_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:08:31.96 -21:31:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 44712_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:58:15.63 -22:44:43.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 23970_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:10:44.96 -16:36:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 41514_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:29:26.05 -19:20:51.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 38348_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:11:31.35 -18:38:26.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 37373_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:56:23.71 -18:18:15.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089
The candidate 28887_fd_Lib-04-Q1b1x1_2026-08-17_22-44-56_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHTs_0089 did not pass the final checks
