This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4662* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.8 9.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
N Tau,2461269.9662,9.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
N Tau 20260817.4662 9.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4662 2461269.9662 14.26 05:34:32.77 +22:24:08.3
184.23005 -5.57397 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.3" and 7.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.566 Stereoskopia -0 -0 0 14.2 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:32.77 +22:24:08.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:32.77 +22:24:08.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4662* 05 34 32.77 +22 24 08.3 14.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9662,14.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4662 14.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4662* 05 21 07.66 +23 38 19.8 9.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461269.9662,9.41,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260817.4662 9.41CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4662 2461269.9662 14.43 05:24:53.64 +20:08:05.1
184.92333 -8.69234 galactic Tau Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 8.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.377 Campania -0 -1 1 14.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:53.64 +20:08:05.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:53.64 +20:08:05.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4662* 05 24 53.64 +20 08 05.1 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9662,14.43,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4662 14.43CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4662 2461269.9662 13.49 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6
186.39988 -2.66428 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 8.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.76 Freia -0 -0 0 13.8 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4662* 05 50 09.36 +22 04 54.6 13.5 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9662,13.49,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4662 13.49CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461269.96658979 17.08.2026 11:11:43.358 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 18304
Objects passed selection criteria: 18204
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12746
Average stars matched: 12199 (95.7085 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 243536 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:46:07 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
First image: 2461032.81064075 23.12.2025 07:27:09.361 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Last image: 2461269.96658979 17.08.2026 11:11:43.358 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 140
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 38 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 139912
Objects passed selection criteria: 139463
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 103604
Average stars matched: 97572.5 (94.1779 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 538284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:47:42 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.96585867
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.395 +21:59:59.76 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.395 +21:59:59.76
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0046 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0174 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.395 +21:59:59.76
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01349 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.GR9AmW1h4w
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fgBwvMXJ82
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9T7D7FSbyK
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ebB4vw8AJr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.969200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.969200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec +16.4790 to +27.2884 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3514 to 91.9479 deg, Dec 16.4790 to 27.2884 deg
Loaded 12406 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8976 out of 10160 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10160 out of 22997 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=6.0)
Read 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec +16.4876 to +27.3008 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3773 to 91.9061 deg, Dec 16.4876 to 27.3008 deg
Loaded 12329 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8847 out of 10017 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10017 out of 20916 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=5.9)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
2.0 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
2.4 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.2 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.GR9AmW1h4w (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2479, bad_region=3694, passed=22997
Got 22997 stars (including 17090 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22997 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4775 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4774 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 20056 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4705 stars left (next iteration limit 5175)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4705 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.386 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.461 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.273 n_q1=1788 n_q2=376 n_q3=1844 n_q4=697 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.193
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fgBwvMXJ82 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2320, bad_region=3377, passed=20916
Got 20916 stars (including 15475 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 20916 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4776 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4708 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4777 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 18215 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4708 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4708 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.605 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.498 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.402 n_q1=1784 n_q2=371 n_q3=1863 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.175
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9T7D7FSbyK (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=850, bad_region=3725, passed=11125
Got 11125 stars (including 6818 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11125 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4710 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4710 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 8163 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 4712 stars left (next iteration limit 5181)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=7.083 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.253 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.607 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.904 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4712 robust_rms=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.633 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4712 robust_rms_before=0.970 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.573 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.500 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.706 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.633
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.332 +21:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
### Converting SExtractor-derived pixel positions to celestial coordinates using xy2sky from WCSTools ###
### Converted positions of 11125 stars ###
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_before_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/correct_sextractor_wcs_catalog_usingxy2sky2585425.tmp' -> 'vast_debug_catalog_after_xy2sky_correction.cat.log'
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution (order 5, robust RMS 0.970 -> 0.500 arcsec)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits N_match=4712 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.535 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.474 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.572 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.707 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.477 n_q1=1235 n_q2=1316 n_q3=908 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.322
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ebB4vw8AJr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=820, bad_region=3567, passed=10604
Got 10604 stars (including 6477 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10604 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4792 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4709 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4708 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.6 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4793 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4712 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4711 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7768 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 4711 stars left (next iteration limit 5178)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=7.153 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.423 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.619 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.927 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4711 robust_rms=0.499 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.637 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4711 robust_rms_before=0.984 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.563 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.499 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.674 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.637
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.674 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits N_match=4711 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.579 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.631 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.702 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.506 n_q1=1235 n_q2=1302 n_q3=921 n_q4=1253 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.213
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits sigma_overall=0.386 worst_q_ratio=1.193
ref2=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits sigma_overall=0.515 worst_q_ratio=1.175
new1=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits sigma_overall=0.535 worst_q_ratio=1.322
new2=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits sigma_overall=0.579 worst_q_ratio=1.213
reference average sigma_overall=0.4505 worst_q_ratio=1.184
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378_astrometric_residuals.png (4705 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.35 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035_astrometric_residuals.png (4708 matched stars from wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.47 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558_astrometric_residuals.png (4712 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.42 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559_astrometric_residuals.png (4711 matched stars from wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.53 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 17s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 30727_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 30727_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 19272_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.37 +17:54:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Image size: 941.6'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Image size: 937.8'x624.4' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.88"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:18.332 +21:59:59.36 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:18.332 +21:59:59.36
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0048 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Image size: 937.5'x624.2' 15.6(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.87"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:32:19.570 +21:59:57.74
Second-epoch image center 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0174 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:32:18.332 +21:59:59.36
Second-epoch second image center 05:32:15.876 +22:00:33.39
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01339 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lpm0TLM3HW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vgOzeA0BVx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits &> /tmp/tmp.t5B4eAqjvM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z2B11c5oEE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits and wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825500
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825500
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 167968 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec +16.4791 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3408 to 91.9478 deg, Dec 16.4791 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 12414 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7145 out of 10502 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10502 out of 167968 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (aperture=4.5)
Read 163013 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec +16.4845 to +27.3051 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 74.3370 to 91.9475 deg, Dec 16.4845 to 27.3051 deg
Loaded 12419 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 7184 out of 10475 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 10475 out of 163013 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (aperture=4.4)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 127 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
1.8 pix Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
2.1 pix fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lpm0TLM3HW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=21684, bad_region=23036, passed=167940
Got 167940 stars (including 124901 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 167940 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4762 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4714 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4763 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150202 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4714 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 150201 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4714 stars left (next iteration limit 5185)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits N_match=4714 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.388 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.472 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.371 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.345 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.297 n_q1=1719 n_q2=437 n_q3=1839 n_q4=719 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.214
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vgOzeA0BVx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=20219, bad_region=22244, passed=162977
Got 162977 stars (including 121992 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 162977 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4706 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4706 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4760 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4705 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4704 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 145759 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4704 stars left (next iteration limit 5176)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits N_match=4704 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.615 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.445 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.412 n_q1=1720 n_q2=418 n_q3=1843 n_q4=723 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.238
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits -region wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.t5B4eAqjvM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=5967, bad_region=20872, passed=87703
Got 87703 stars (including 62346 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87703 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013025 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010420 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4707 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4707 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4709 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 72386 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Excluding outliers - 4709 stars left (next iteration limit 5177)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=7.166 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.153 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.589 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.878 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4709 robust_rms=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.623 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4709 robust_rms_before=0.487 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.537 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.488 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.644 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.623
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.644 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits N_match=4709 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.546 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.465 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.567 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.729 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.505 n_q1=1275 n_q2=1316 n_q3=888 n_q4=1230 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.337
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.z2B11c5oEE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=5685, bad_region=20219, passed=84509
Got 84509 stars (including 60010 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 84509 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013021 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010417 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4779 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4716 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4778 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69568 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4716 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 69569 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Excluding outliers - 4716 stars left (next iteration limit 5187)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=7.203 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=8.275 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.593 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.892 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4716 robust_rms=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.612 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4716 robust_rms_before=0.963 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.532 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.482 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.682 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.612
SIP_REFIT: applied the refit solution to the output catalog positions only (order 5, robust RMS 0.963 -> 0.482 arcsec); the image header was NOT rewritten as wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits is a symbolic link
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits N_match=4716 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.510 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.518 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.683 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.460 n_q1=1265 n_q2=1308 n_q3=897 n_q4=1246 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.339
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-10-40_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0558.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_064035_TTUQ2b1x1_2532572_bJ5dc3Ft/wcs_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:32.77 +22:24:08.3: 16.07 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:11.76 +21:54:46.7: 14.56 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:27:52.85 +22:16:48.1: 13.95 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:17:20.29 +18:28:36.3: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:15:27.18 +18:46:17.4: 14.20 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:44.28 +21:19:04.2: 13.88 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:40:39.05 +19:11:33.8: 13.66 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:34.42 +19:37:48.4: 13.99 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:15:27.18 +18:46:17.4: 14.35 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:11.76 +21:54:46.7: 14.28 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:17:20.29 +18:28:36.3: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:32.77 +22:24:08.3: 16.02 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:27:52.85 +22:16:48.1: 13.86 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.25 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.90 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.40 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:15:27.18 +18:46:17.4: ref_mag=14.25 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.1839 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:52.85 +22:16:48.1: ref_mag=13.90 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0818 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:27:11.76 +21:54:46.7: ref_mag=14.40 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.2954 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:17:20.29 +18:28:36.3: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0210 delta=-0.42 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:44.28 +21:19:04.2: 13.85 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.86 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:44.28 +21:19:04.2: ref_mag=13.86 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9542 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:34.42 +19:37:48.4: 13.98 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:34.42 +19:37:48.4: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9670 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:40:39.05 +19:11:33.8: 13.68 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.67 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:40:39.05 +19:11:33.8: ref_mag=13.67 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.0337 delta=-0.37 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:32.75 +18:22:31.2: 13.78 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:16:49.05 +19:53:02.3: 13.56 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:39:11.38 +24:41:24.6: 13.60 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:34:17.60 +19:09:23.9: 13.52 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:32:24.14 +20:11:57.9: 13.58 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:13.92 +21:43:53.1: 13.28 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:16:49.05 +19:53:02.3: 13.71 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:32.75 +18:22:31.2: 13.83 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.80 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:32.75 +18:22:31.2: ref_mag=13.80 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6747 delta=0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:16:49.05 +19:53:02.3: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7773 delta=-0.15 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:35.52 +21:00:10.2: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:46.0: 13.42 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:39:11.38 +24:41:24.6: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:32:24.14 +20:11:57.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:39:11.38 +24:41:24.6: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.7399 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:34:17.60 +19:09:23.9: 13.62 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:32:24.14 +20:11:57.9: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6550 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:34:17.60 +19:09:23.9: ref_mag=13.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.7324 delta=-0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:13.92 +21:43:53.1: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:13.92 +21:43:53.1: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5790 delta=-0.25 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:46.0: 13.44 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:35.52 +21:00:10.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.43 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:07.08 +19:55:46.0: ref_mag=13.43 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4636 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:35.52 +21:00:10.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.5238 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:45.81 +20:59:07.9: 13.35 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:33:56.87 +22:41:46.0: 12.98 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:45.81 +20:59:07.9: 13.32 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:31.73 +24:29:03.4: 12.91 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.34 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:45.81 +20:59:07.9: ref_mag=13.34 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.4274 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:33:56.87 +22:41:46.0: 12.99 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.99 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:33:56.87 +22:41:46.0: ref_mag=12.99 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.9571 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:31.73 +24:29:03.4: 12.94 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.92 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:31.73 +24:29:03.4: ref_mag=12.92 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=13.1596 delta=-0.24 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:45:55.32 +19:03:03.6: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:28.9: 13.43 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:37:40.06 +22:58:28.8: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:49:14.99 +17:43:48.5: 13.43 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:45:55.32 +19:03:03.6: 13.44 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:45:55.32 +19:03:03.6: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5233 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:28.9: 13.51 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:30:21.62 +25:20:28.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3635 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:49:14.99 +17:43:48.5: 13.42 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:37:40.06 +22:58:28.8: 13.59 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:49:14.99 +17:43:48.5: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5944 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.59 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:37:40.06 +22:58:28.8: ref_mag=13.59 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5467 delta=0.04 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:29:24.38 +22:36:33.9: 13.92 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:29:24.38 +22:36:33.9: 14.04 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:33.41 +23:54:40.2: 14.10 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:31:17.17 +21:51:54.1: 14.36 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:29:24.38 +22:36:33.9: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=14.1006 delta=-0.13 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:24:53.64 +20:08:05.1: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:31:17.17 +21:51:54.1: 14.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:24:53.64 +20:08:05.1: 15.97 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:33.41 +23:54:40.2: 14.07 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.39 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:31:17.17 +21:51:54.1: ref_mag=14.39 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=14.4078 delta=-0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.09 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:50:33.41 +23:54:40.2: ref_mag=14.09 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=14.3532 delta=-0.26 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_01-27-09_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0378.fits at 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6: 15.26 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.1: 13.25 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.25 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:13:05.02 +20:18:42.1: ref_mag=13.25 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2327 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_20-27-39_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0035.fits at 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6: 15.18 +/- 0.16 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.22 +/- 0.12
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 05:50:09.36 +22:04:54.6: ref_mag=15.22 +/- 0.12 new_mean_mag=13.4755 delta=1.74 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189055.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out200817.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77274.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 88s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189051_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:28.40 +24:41:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189052_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 189055_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189059_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:17.93 +22:36:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189062_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189062_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:04.21 +22:41:05.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189063_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:39.86 +21:02:57.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189069_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189073_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189073_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:41.89 +20:11:12.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189075_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189078_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189078_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189082_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189082_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189087_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:57.98 +25:22:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189088_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189089_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:33.69 +17:46:12.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189090_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189090_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189094_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:33.80 +19:32:03.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189099_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:33.43 +22:05:11.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189102_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189108_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189110_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189111_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189112_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189112_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:46.08 +18:05:11.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189119_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189120_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:42.14 +20:52:52.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189121_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189125_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189130_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:07.12 +18:02:07.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189131_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189135_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189135_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:26.65 +25:17:06.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189137_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189137_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:06.27 +17:57:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189138_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189138_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:56.55 +25:28:06.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189139_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189139_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:56.28 +20:14:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189145_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189146_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189147_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189147_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:17.15 +18:20:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189153_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:45.62 +17:48:35.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189156_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 189156_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:16.92 +20:08:48.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189297_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 189297_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 190936_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:10.48 +23:20:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 191451_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:50.70 +22:27:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191470_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 191470_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.10 +22:38:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 191933_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 191933_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:00.28 +18:59:08.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192305_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192305_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:36.97 +25:05:44.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192310_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192310_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.63 +20:46:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192378_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192378_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:54.84 +23:41:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192393_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:11.71 +19:34:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192494_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192494_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:38.39 +18:33:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192680_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192680_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:11.00 +20:10:05.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192709_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:11.78 +22:40:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 192738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 192738_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:37.37 +18:52:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193027_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193027_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:54.29 +26:06:00.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193053_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:13.63 +21:51:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193532_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:27.17 +20:53:28.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193561_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193561_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:02.96 +18:33:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193601_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:42.29 +23:00:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193656_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193656_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:36.27 +18:33:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 193696_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 193696_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:11.21 +18:40:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194084_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:07.78 +19:32:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194314_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194314_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:10.54 +20:05:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:29.15 +18:44:56.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194480_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194480_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:03.89 +19:09:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194622_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:51.00 +20:15:58.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194750_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194750_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:41.22 +20:56:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194904_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194904_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:00.16 +24:57:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194910_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:47:05.78 +23:11:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194953_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194953_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:20.20 +24:24:52.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 194970_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 194970_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:29.64 +21:46:14.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195041_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195057_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:14.97 +19:35:44.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195170_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:17.34 +20:45:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195176_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:24.99 +18:03:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195520_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195520_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195698_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195698_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:44:13.68 +25:22:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195725_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195725_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195742_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195791_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:37.88 +18:57:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195903_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195903_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:20.19 +25:09:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195925_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195925_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:06.31 +24:25:28.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195963_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:56.57 +22:39:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 195992_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 195992_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:31.84 +20:45:41.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196019_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:30.42 +20:09:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196033_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196033_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:45.59 +21:24:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196254_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:27.37 +21:47:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196258_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:25.17 +23:07:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:43:23.01 +21:25:46.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196340_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:21.91 +24:21:26.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196347_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:50.22 +25:14:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196366_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196366_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:44.72 +21:12:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196414_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196414_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:30.06 +21:58:58.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196463_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196463_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:41:07.01 +24:22:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196536_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196536_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:18.96 +21:33:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196629_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196629_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:39.33 +20:14:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196683_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196683_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:04.51 +20:26:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196736_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196736_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:11.50 +25:41:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196815_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196815_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:31.19 +19:46:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196864_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196864_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:36.99 +25:18:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196905_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196905_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:49:12.11 +19:49:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 196954_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 196954_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:45:37.86 +19:23:17.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197054_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:50:27.53 +18:02:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197132_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197132_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:38.01 +22:58:42.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197209_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:56.41 +18:54:17.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197302_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197302_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:08.34 +22:06:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197486_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197486_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:40.11 +21:15:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197602_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197602_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:56.25 +22:27:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197604_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197604_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:43.87 +26:10:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197700_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:04.24 +21:09:55.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 197883_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 197883_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:26.48 +22:27:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198117_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:42:09.08 +18:54:28.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198249_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:58.90 +21:26:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198429_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198429_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198491_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198491_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:34.84 +22:41:44.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 198900_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 198900_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:51.59 +20:00:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199044_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:23.04 +21:26:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199213_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199213_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:30.70 +25:57:54.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199325_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:51:02.31 +24:55:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 199401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 199401_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:48.68 +20:25:39.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200371_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 200371_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200733_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 200733_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200817_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 200817_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 200820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 200820_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:48:31.25 +21:00:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 120168_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:46:56.37 +17:54:32.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 14597_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:00.37 +26:13:08.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 180008_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
Preparing report for the candidate 77274_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 108934_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:17.99 +20:22:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559
The candidate 25835_fd_Tau-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_06-11-43_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0559 did not pass the final checks
