This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4489 2461269.9489 13.06 07:11:25.33 +17:39:01.3
199.19804 12.24637 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.8" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.202 Chryseis 1 -0 1 13.4 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:25.33 +17:39:01.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:25.33 +17:39:01.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9489,13.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4489 13.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4489 2461269.9489 13.10 07:27:32.64 +24:56:07.5
193.81871 18.59380 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.7" and 9.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.145 Adeona 1 0 1 13.5 0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:32.64 +24:56:07.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:32.64 +24:56:07.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9489,13.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4489 13.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4489 2461269.9489 13.96 07:12:26.03 +19:22:00.9
197.70154 13.18077 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.6" and 9.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.405 Thia 1 -0 1 14.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:26.03 +19:22:00.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:26.03 +19:22:00.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9489,13.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4489 13.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4489 2461269.9489 12.88 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2
194.83332 14.40447 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.4" and 9.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.521 Brixia 1 0 1 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.13
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9489,12.88,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4489 12.88CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461269.94918628 17.08.2026 10:46:39.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 17105
Objects passed selection criteria: 17013
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.5 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 11178.8
Average stars matched: 10241.8 (91.618 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 242284 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:02:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
First image: 2461093.68545435 22.02.2026 04:26:53.256 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Last image: 2461269.94918628 17.08.2026 10:46:39.695 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 75
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 30 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 117236
Objects passed selection criteria: 116860
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.6 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 81997.5
Average stars matched: 74438 (90.7808 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 509416 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:04:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.94859212
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0398 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.skBdt2q6JR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5FcWSOmBYE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cQSBVFyxaX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.obin5WXwMs
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.922900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.922900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4797 to +27.2941 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0337 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4797 to 27.2941 deg
Loaded 13974 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10666 out of 11758 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11758 out of 23656 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec +16.4801 to +27.2943 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0336 to 119.5911 deg, Dec 16.4801 to 27.2943 deg
Loaded 13972 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 10626 out of 11736 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 11736 out of 23398 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=6.2)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 6 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.5 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.4 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
13.8 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.8 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.skBdt2q6JR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2265, bad_region=7924, passed=23656
Got 23656 stars (including 14270 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23656 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4866 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4839 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4839 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17358 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4839 stars left (next iteration limit 5322)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4839 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.379 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.464 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.376 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.340 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.321 n_q1=1308 n_q2=959 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1064 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.224
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5FcWSOmBYE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=2268, bad_region=7854, passed=23398
Got 23398 stars (including 14073 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4834 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4862 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4834 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 17156 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4834 stars left (next iteration limit 5317)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4834 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.433 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.554 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.380 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.381 n_q1=1295 n_q2=958 n_q3=1508 n_q4=1073 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.281
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cQSBVFyxaX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=555, bad_region=995, passed=7912
Got 7912 stars (including 6421 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7912 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4830 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4832 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7131 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5263)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=5.405 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=15.004 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.701 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.784 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.587 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.423 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.527 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.540 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.592 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.587
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.592 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.503 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.571 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.422 n_q1=1813 n_q2=671 n_q3=1665 n_q4=636 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.113
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.obin5WXwMs (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=590, bad_region=1029, passed=7885
Got 7885 stars (including 6352 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4787 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4827 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 7068 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=6.043 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.032 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.708 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.787 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4784 robust_rms=0.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.591 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4784 robust_rms_before=1.458 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.524 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.539 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.597 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.591
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.597 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.521 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.513 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.589 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1801 n_q2=676 n_q3=1667 n_q4=640 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.130
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits sigma_overall=0.379 worst_q_ratio=1.224
ref2=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits sigma_overall=0.433 worst_q_ratio=1.281
new1=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits sigma_overall=0.513 worst_q_ratio=1.113
new2=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits sigma_overall=0.521 worst_q_ratio=1.130
reference average sigma_overall=0.406 worst_q_ratio=1.2525
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153_astrometric_residuals.png (4839 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.33 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154_astrometric_residuals.png (4834 matched stars from wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.38 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530_astrometric_residuals.png (4785 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531_astrometric_residuals.png (4784 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.46 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:32.37 +23:01:31.1: 11.22 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7: 9.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.1: 10.85 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.3: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:35.40 +22:51:40.0: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7: 9.24 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.3: 10.05 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.1: 10.83 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:32.37 +23:01:31.1: 11.23 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.84 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.05 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.22 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:09.78 +22:47:45.1: ref_mag=10.84 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=11.1236 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:32.37 +23:01:31.1: ref_mag=11.22 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=11.3125 delta=-0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:42.84 +22:54:43.3: ref_mag=10.05 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=10.6415 delta=-0.59 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out33215.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 43s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 31130_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31683_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 31683_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.18 +25:59:40.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 31940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 31940_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 32650_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 32907_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 32907_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 33215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 33215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.7 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=11.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.42)
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 43s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Image size: 941.7'x627.1' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0398 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.5' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.87"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 07:23:03.854 +21:59:59.41
Second-epoch image center 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0537 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 07:23:13.929 +21:59:29.67
Second-epoch second image center 07:23:16.864 +21:58:50.96
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01563 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pWHTh5qp0M
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PMJAK3d2Bj
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nmpd43JHOE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits &> /tmp/tmp.By63Mmh3m5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits and wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.772750
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.772750
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.24
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.53
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 151496 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec +16.4740 to +27.2968 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0323 to 119.6245 deg, Dec 16.4740 to 27.2968 deg
Loaded 14006 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8794 out of 12008 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12008 out of 151496 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 153605 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec +16.4748 to +27.3045 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 102.0325 to 119.6247 deg, Dec 16.4748 to 27.3045 deg
Loaded 14009 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 8793 out of 12010 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 12010 out of 153605 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (aperture=4.6)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 66 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.1 pix Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.5 mag. Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
14.0 mag. fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pWHTh5qp0M (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=17705, bad_region=41121, passed=151473
Got 151473 stars (including 98315 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 151473 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4865 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 118837 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.439 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.310 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.313 n_q1=1345 n_q2=911 n_q3=1579 n_q4=1018 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.254
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PMJAK3d2Bj (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=43, blended=17785, bad_region=41723, passed=153562
Got 153562 stars (including 99663 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 153562 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4853 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4864 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4853 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 120523 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4853 stars left (next iteration limit 5338)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits N_match=4853 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.402 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.515 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.404 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.352 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.365 n_q1=1334 n_q2=911 n_q3=1578 n_q4=1030 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.280
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nmpd43JHOE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=19, blended=3557, bad_region=6181, passed=59953
Got 59953 stars (including 50375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 59953 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4820 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4821 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55336 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=5.505 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=13.316 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.694 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.754 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.590 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=1.451 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.508 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.538 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.605 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.590
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.605 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.496 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.484 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.476 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.549 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.392 n_q1=1811 n_q2=721 n_q3=1577 n_q4=667 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.107
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.By63Mmh3m5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=2, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=1, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=18, blended=3308, bad_region=6207, passed=60502
Got 60502 stars (including 51128 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60502 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4818 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4779 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4778 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4819 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4775 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 55884 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Excluding outliers - 4775 stars left (next iteration limit 5255)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=6.146 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.759 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.698 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.767 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4775 robust_rms=0.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.588 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4775 robust_rms_before=1.497 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.496 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.532 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.599 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.588
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.599 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits N_match=4775 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.494 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.481 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.452 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.573 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.423 n_q1=1806 n_q2=726 n_q3=1553 n_q4=690 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.161
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-45-48_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0530.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_055832_TTUQ2b1x1_770791_g5GBnA24/wcs_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:31:39.01 +24:33:38.4: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:30:51.07 +21:40:08.3: 13.76 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:00.7: 12.83 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.6: 10.49 +/- 0.15 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:07:25.88 +20:54:36.8: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:38:24.14 +21:34:51.9: 13.51 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:41:40.14 +23:05:34.1: 12.34 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:31:39.01 +24:33:38.4: 13.58 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:30:51.07 +21:40:08.3: 13.86 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.6: 10.50 +/- 0.14 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:00.7: 12.87 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:07:25.88 +20:54:36.8: 13.28 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 saturated
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:13.82 +22:54:53.5: the source is saturated (present but too bright to measure) on at least one reference image -- likely a star-matching failure rather than a new transient
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:38:24.14 +21:34:51.9: 13.42 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.49 +/- 0.10
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.60 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.30 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:49.90 +22:56:14.6: ref_mag=10.49 +/- 0.10 new_mean_mag=11.4838 delta=-0.99 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.81 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:31:39.01 +24:33:38.4: ref_mag=13.60 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.6018 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.85 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:07:25.88 +20:54:36.8: ref_mag=13.30 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1180 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.46 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:30:51.07 +21:40:08.3: ref_mag=13.81 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.5388 delta=0.27 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:14.95 +18:59:00.7: ref_mag=12.85 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.8609 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:38:24.14 +21:34:51.9: ref_mag=13.46 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3977 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.1: 12.61 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:41:40.14 +23:05:34.1: 12.35 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.34 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:41:40.14 +23:05:34.1: ref_mag=12.34 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.3404 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:54.79 +22:50:51.1: 10.82 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.1: 12.55 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.58 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:35.09 +19:24:26.1: ref_mag=12.58 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4614 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:40:46.71 +23:15:29.4: 12.54 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.5: 12.40 +/- 0.35 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:28:31.06 +20:04:44.3: 12.55 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:54.79 +22:50:51.1: 10.83 +/- 0.11 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 10.82 +/- 0.08
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:54.79 +22:50:51.1: ref_mag=10.82 +/- 0.08 new_mean_mag=12.5759 delta=-1.75 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.5: 12.33 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.40 +/- 0.35
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:40:46.71 +23:15:29.4: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:40.85 +22:57:36.5: ref_mag=12.40 +/- 0.35 new_mean_mag=12.7894 delta=-0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:40:46.71 +23:15:29.4: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5212 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:28:31.06 +20:04:44.3: 12.56 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.55 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:28:31.06 +20:04:44.3: ref_mag=12.55 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.4672 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:11:25.33 +17:39:01.3: 15.94 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:27:32.64 +24:56:07.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:11:25.33 +17:39:01.3: 15.92 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:32:11.86 +22:12:50.6: 13.41 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:27:32.64 +24:56:07.5: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:20:00.98 +20:13:25.6: 13.45 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:39.63 +22:49:42.5: 12.90 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:05:29.14 +22:51:12.8: 13.70 +/- 0.33 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:32:11.86 +22:12:50.6: 13.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.40 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:32:11.86 +22:12:50.6: ref_mag=13.40 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.1998 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:20:00.98 +20:13:25.6: 13.40 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.42 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:20:00.98 +20:13:25.6: ref_mag=13.42 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.3060 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:06:18.88 +22:52:12.9: 11.04 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:39.63 +22:49:42.5: 12.98 +/- 0.28 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:39.63 +22:49:42.5: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=13.5751 delta=-0.63 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:05:29.14 +22:51:12.8: 13.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.70 +/- 0.33
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:05:29.14 +22:51:12.8: ref_mag=13.70 +/- 0.33 new_mean_mag=13.5545 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:26.03 +19:22:00.9: 16.06 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:06:18.88 +22:52:12.9: 11.06 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.04 +/- 0.11
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 07:06:18.88 +22:52:12.9: ref_mag=11.04 +/- 0.11 new_mean_mag=13.9697 delta=-2.92 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:26.03 +19:22:00.9: 16.05 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-26-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0153.fits at 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2: 15.22 +/- 0.17 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-21_22-27-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits at 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2: 15.43 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.31 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 07:12:20.40 +22:24:33.2: ref_mag=15.31 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=12.8731 delta=2.44 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182230.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out182866.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out189551.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64874.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 12s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171763_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171767_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171771_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171780_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171780_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:13:49.34 +19:58:21.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171784_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 171794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 171794_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 174143_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 174512_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 174512_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:04.58 +22:51:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 175695_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 176069_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:12.51 +22:52:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 176951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 176951_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:57.35 +22:56:37.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 177974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 177974_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178364_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:02.91 +23:03:00.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178489_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178489_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178644_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:41:43.08 +18:04:11.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178672_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178882_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:46.94 +22:42:06.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178942_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:25.33 +25:56:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 178964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 178964_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 179202_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 179332_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:42.14 +22:10:16.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 179871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 179871_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 180052_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:21:48.47 +20:26:14.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180192_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 180192_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:15.23 +21:47:42.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 180429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:17:42.43 +21:18:41.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180589_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 180589_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:04:06.40 +18:39:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 180854_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 180854_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:15:07.96 +21:35:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 181086_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:22.50 +20:30:19.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 181879_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:09:50.82 +18:51:18.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
Preparing report for the candidate 182230_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182239_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:32:08.77 +23:56:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182274_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:35:49.55 +24:54:15.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182417_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:23.09 +22:43:57.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182668_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:45.91 +23:15:01.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
Preparing report for the candidate 182866_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182895_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182895_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:10.16 +22:52:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 182902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 182902_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:31:54.32 +24:32:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 183429_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.05 +20:06:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 183732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 183732_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:00.22 +22:57:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184067_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 184067_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:19:45.59 +20:26:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 184833_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:26:55.36 +21:31:08.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 184853_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:29:20.31 +24:26:16.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 184936_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 184936_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:11.07 +24:39:05.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185215_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:24.60 +22:49:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185399_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185399_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:26.00 +22:50:03.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185593_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185593_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:03.50 +19:28:24.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185766_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.05 +22:57:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185779_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 185939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 185939_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186212_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:14:40.64 +20:31:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186488_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:22:30.23 +22:57:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186510_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186739_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:05:43.86 +22:49:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186891_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186891_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:20:30.44 +20:05:39.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 186904_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 186904_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:06:11.13 +22:51:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 187160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 187160_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 188011_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:10:01.60 +21:27:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 188729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 188729_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:25:02.70 +19:56:33.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 189227_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:34:29.80 +22:47:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189401_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 189401_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189507_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 189507_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:27:03.73 +20:16:02.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 189551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
Preparing report for the candidate 189551_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 15633_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:16:34.18 +25:59:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 163170_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 07:07:34.74 +24:13:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
Preparing report for the candidate 64874_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531
The candidate 120103_fd_Gem-04-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_05-46-39_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0531 did not pass the final checks
