This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,6.75,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 6.75CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4095 2461269.9095 9.03 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5
187.90781 0.69173 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.1 Ceres 1 0 1 8.9 -0 -0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5: 15.52 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.31
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,9.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 9.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4095 2461269.9095 11.10 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4
189.45175 4.37953 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.27 Euterpe 0 -0 0 11.5 0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,11.10,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 11.10CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
EPIC 202095314,2461269.9095,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
EPIC 202095314 20260817.4095 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,7.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 7.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4095 2461269.9095 13.03 06:16:15.98 +19:32:17.9
191.62021 1.39157 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.712 Boliviana -0 0 0 13.3 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:15.98 +19:32:17.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:15.98 +19:32:17.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 08 17.4095* 06 16 15.98 +19 32 17.9 13.0 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,13.03,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 13.03CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 08 17.4095 2461269.9095 13.22 06:44:48.28 +25:42:49.3
189.08816 10.05741 galactic Gem Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.6" and 7.5 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.111 Ate 0 1 1 13.4 -0 0
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:48.28 +25:42:49.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:48.28 +25:42:49.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Check this position in TNS.Manually check the ASAS-SN list of transients!Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc90 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461269.9095,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260817.4095 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461269.90976956 17.08.2026 09:49:54.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 19209
Objects passed selection criteria: 19152
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 16774.8
Average stars matched: 14613.2 (87.1146 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 248304 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:00:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
First image: 2461058.61760534 18.01.2026 02:49:11.101 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Last image: 2461269.90976956 17.08.2026 09:49:54.090 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 244
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 3
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
VAST_SKIP_INDEX_VS_MAG is set - skipping the lib/index_vs_mag variability-index fitting
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 137532
Objects passed selection criteria: 137255
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 121130
Average stars matched: 109674 (90.5418 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 622936 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc90 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20260214 p5) 15.2.1 20260214
VaST compiled on Fri Aug 14 19:27:11 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc89-191-g1c132b07
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-08-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Mon Aug 17 06:01:34 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461269.90928182
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tns_transients_list.txt
'../tns_transients_list.txt' -> 'tns_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2jahFtgwBS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.QAjSIH6sXy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EJI0Zdwkys
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WAzrPfNLEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881900
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881900
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.79
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.09
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec +16.3282 to +27.3630 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9455 to 105.5063 deg, Dec 16.3282 to 27.3630 deg
Loaded 19945 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14221 out of 15960 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15960 out of 29338 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=6.2)
Read 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec +16.5172 to +27.2358 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2224 to 105.7491 deg, Dec 16.5172 to 27.2358 deg
Loaded 19341 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 14457 out of 15956 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 15956 out of 31529 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=6.5)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.5 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.1 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
cp: cannot create regular file 'local_wcs_cache/': Not a directory
############ /tmp/tmp.2jahFtgwBS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3278, bad_region=6704, passed=29338
Got 29338 stars (including 19960 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29338 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4803 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4802 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4863 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4804 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 24050 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 4804 stars left (next iteration limit 5282)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4804 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.382 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.427 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.343 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.389 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.324 n_q1=1455 n_q2=895 n_q3=1550 n_q4=904 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.117
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.QAjSIH6sXy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=3030, bad_region=7092, passed=31529
Got 31529 stars (including 22011 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 31529 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4881 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4825 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4824 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4879 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4827 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 26103 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 4827 stars left (next iteration limit 5306)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4827 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.384 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.436 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.486 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.427 n_q1=1500 n_q2=1011 n_q3=1428 n_q4=888 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.EJI0Zdwkys (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=703, bad_region=1682, passed=11847
Got 11847 stars (including 9509 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11847 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4784 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4853 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4785 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10536 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Excluding outliers - 4785 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=5.588 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.625 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.721 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.763 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4785 robust_rms=0.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.666 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4785 robust_rms_before=1.668 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.606 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.632 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.644 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.666
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.644 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4785 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.602 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.656 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.581 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.582 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=1584 n_q2=654 n_q3=1745 n_q4=802 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.102
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WAzrPfNLEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=706, bad_region=1702, passed=11938
Got 11938 stars (including 9582 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11938 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4849 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4786 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4786 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4855 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.61"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4788 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 10613 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 4788 stars left (next iteration limit 5264)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=5.786 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.195 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.720 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.078 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4788 robust_rms=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.686 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4788 robust_rms_before=1.699 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.616 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.618 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.629 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.686
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.629 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4788 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.659 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.604 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.598 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.664 n_q1=1573 n_q2=671 n_q3=1748 n_q4=796 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.100
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving the final (post-refit) wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
###################################
# Pre-local-correction WCS quality summary (see WCS_QUALITY_DIAG lines above)
ref1=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits sigma_overall=0.382 worst_q_ratio=1.117
ref2=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits sigma_overall=0.434 worst_q_ratio=1.119
new1=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits sigma_overall=0.602 worst_q_ratio=1.102
new2=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits sigma_overall=0.604 worst_q_ratio=1.100
reference average sigma_overall=0.408 worst_q_ratio=1.118
warn-on-ratio threshold: 2.0x reference
###################################
Astrometric residual vector field (catalog-matched stars):
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057_astrometric_residuals.png (4804 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.37 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041_astrometric_residuals.png (4827 matched stars from wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.40 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472_astrometric_residuals.png (4785 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.56 arcsec)
plot_astrometric_residuals_xy.py: wrote wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473_astrometric_residuals.png (4788 matched stars from wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals, image 9576x6388, median residual 0.57 arcsec)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4: 15.77 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5: 15.52 +/- 0.31 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4: 15.76 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.52 +/- 0.31
Forced photometry filter KEPT candidate at 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5: ref_mag=15.52 +/- 0.31 new_mean_mag=9.0275 delta=6.49 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38613.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out38625.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 38609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:38.06 +17:59:10.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 38610_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:07:23.78 +18:34:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 38611_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38613_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 38613_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 38625_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 38625_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.5
06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --noflagimage --starmatchraius 5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits exists and is non-empty
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (1st reference image)
verification OK: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Image size: 941.8'x627.2' 15.7(deg)x10.5(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.89"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits (1st new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Image size: 941.0'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0297 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh output for wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits (2nd new image)
verification OK: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Image size: 940.9'x624.4' 15.7(deg)x10.4(deg) 9576x6388 pix
Image scale: 5.90"/pix along the X axis and 5.86"/pix along the Y axis
Image center: 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23 J2000 4789.000 3195.000
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 06:27:40.095 +22:00:29.68
Second-epoch image center 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.0193 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 06:27:42.273 +21:58:47.19
Second-epoch second image center 06:27:42.691 +21:59:30.23
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01206 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for a parallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits &> /tmp/tmp.F9VxYvklMz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Mm00ywoLtB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RDrgH6Zdp2
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qx8T3v61zE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
wait (drain background util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 jobs before Tycho-2 calibration -- avoids wcs_.fits write race)
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Found non-empty wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits and wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
The reference image (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits) and catalog (wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat) found
'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.723200
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.723200
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Lightcurve magnitude calibration plot:
Preparing per-reference-image forced-photometry calibration (method=tycho2 band=V)
Read 206292 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec +16.3091 to +27.3656 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 87.9318 to 105.5265 deg, Dec 16.3091 to 27.3656 deg
Loaded 20018 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11191 out of 16872 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16872 out of 206292 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00001.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (aperture=4.6)
Read 188638 stars from the SExtractor catalog wcsmag.cat
Detected star coordinate range: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec +16.4980 to +27.2397 deg
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Tycho-2 catalog search boundaries: RA 88.2221 to 105.7490 deg, Dec 16.4980 to 27.2397 deg
Loaded 19379 Tycho-2 stars within the image boundaries (VT and BT non-zero).
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Stars used for magnitude calibration (good matches): 11515 out of 16583 total matches.
Matched with Tycho-2 16583 out of 188638 detected stars.
util/calibrate_single_image_with_tycho2.sh: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits via Tycho-2
Single-image forced-photometry magnitude calibration plot for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits:
Forced-photometry filter: reusing the VaST-run aperture from image00002.cat.aperture for wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Forced-photometry filter: calibrated wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -> calib.txt_param_ref_wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (aperture=5.1)
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 186 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 10000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
2.4 pix Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
2.3 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
2.2 pix fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
15.3 mag. Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.F9VxYvklMz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=38, blended=31903, bad_region=37736, passed=206254
Got 206254 stars (including 141027 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 206254 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4785 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 531 to 588 (Dec 16.3 to 27.4)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4828 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4784 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 177293 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 4784 stars left (next iteration limit 5262)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits N_match=4784 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.424 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.350 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.393 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.299 n_q1=1462 n_q2=892 n_q3=1535 n_q4=895 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.133
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Mm00ywoLtB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits' -> 'wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits'
This WCS solution (astrometrynet) will be kept as is, not refit by util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=29566, bad_region=30361, passed=188602
Got 188602 stars (including 132646 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 188602 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4847 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4804 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.5 to 27.2)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4845 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4803 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 166604 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.47"
Excluding outliers - 4803 stars left (next iteration limit 5283)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: util/identify.sh trusts the WCS of wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits (astrometrynet) - keeping it, no refit (set VAST_FORCE_SIP_REFIT=1 to refit anyway)
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits N_match=4803 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.438 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.374 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.434 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.497 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.399 n_q1=1499 n_q2=1022 n_q3=1389 n_q4=893 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.134
The image catalog is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits -region wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RDrgH6Zdp2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=6291, bad_region=9348, passed=88614
Got 88614 stars (including 73481 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013069 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010456 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4836 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4771 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4837 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81800 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4776 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 81801 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4776 stars left (next iteration limit 5248)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=5.753 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=11.154 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.725 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.770 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4776 robust_rms=0.633 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.678 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4776 robust_rms_before=1.676 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.606 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.633 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.643 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.678
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.643 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits N_match=4776 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.592 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.653 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.557 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.652 n_q1=1622 n_q2=648 n_q3=1686 n_q4=820 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.103
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qx8T3v61zE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1122.0 1550.0 1124.0 1552.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1637.0 2824.0 1639.0 2826.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1831.0 2839.0 1833.0 2841.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 1905.0 4570.0 1907.0 4572.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2012.0 4693.0 2014.0 4695.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2397.0 4241.0 2399.0 4243.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding image region: 2679.0 2807.0 2681.0 2809.0 (defined in bad_region.lst)
Excluding more image regions!.. (will not print them all)
Excluded a total of 31 image regions (defined in bad_region.lst).
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=6553, bad_region=9489, passed=90543
Got 90543 stars (including 75055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 90543 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 940.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 940.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013068 (47.0 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010454 (37.6 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4829 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 4773 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4772 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
UCAC5 local query limit 5000: matching up to 5000 detected stars, deepening the UCAC5 window to mag 15.50
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Searching UCAC5 zones 532 to 588 (Dec 16.4 to 27.3)
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 4831 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Accuracy estimation diagnostic: 4773 matched stars entering correct_measured_positions(), 83616 with non-zero local correction accuracy
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.59"
Excluding outliers - 4773 stars left (next iteration limit 5249)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
SIP_REFIT: wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits is a symbolic link - will not rewrite the WCS of whatever it points to, but will still refit the output catalog positions
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 2 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=5.863 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=10.191 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 3 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.718 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=1.067 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: SIP order 5 trial: matched=4773 robust_rms=0.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms=0.667 arcsec
SIP_REFIT: selected SIP order 5
SIP_REFIT: order=5 matched=4773 robust_rms_before=1.697 arcsec robust_rms_before_corrected=0.595 arcsec robust_rms_after=0.611 arcsec worst_quadrant_rms_before=0.619 worst_quadrant_rms_after=0.667
SIP_REFIT: refit does not sufficiently improve on the solution it would replace (best worst-quadrant baseline 0.619 arcsec) - keeping the original
WCS_QUALITY_DIAG: file=fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits N_match=4773 sigma_overall_arcsec=0.580 sigma_q1_arcsec=0.649 sigma_q2_arcsec=0.541 sigma_q3_arcsec=0.600 sigma_q4_arcsec=0.650 n_q1=1610 n_q2=648 n_q3=1699 n_q4=816 worst_quadrant_to_overall_ratio=1.119
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits -region wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits.wcscat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Skipping WCS quality comparison: not the first SExtractor pass (default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL)
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-11_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0472.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-08-17_CI_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_055632_TTUQ2b1x1_682039_XYzOunBn/wcs_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Gem-03-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:04.87 +22:53:29.3: 13.94 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:58:25.71 +24:33:06.1: 13.69 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:15.06 +24:32:09.2: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:15:21.35 +24:15:34.0: 13.89 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:16.48 +25:14:20.9: 13.62 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:21:28.81 +19:16:39.6: 13.89 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:51.07 +21:27:38.2: 13.52 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:56.47 +20:58:27.1: 13.64 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:58:25.71 +24:33:06.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:51.07 +21:27:38.2: 13.37 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:15.06 +24:32:09.2: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:15:21.35 +24:15:34.0: 13.90 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:04.87 +22:53:29.3: 14.02 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:21:28.81 +19:16:39.6: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:16.48 +25:14:20.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.44 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:58:25.71 +24:33:06.1: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.9056 delta=-0.21 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.97 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.89 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.73 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:44:51.07 +21:27:38.2: ref_mag=13.44 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4143 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:04.87 +22:53:29.3: ref_mag=13.97 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.6635 delta=0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:15.06 +24:32:09.2: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8033 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:21:28.81 +19:16:39.6: ref_mag=13.73 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.8694 delta=-0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:15:21.35 +24:15:34.0: ref_mag=13.89 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9515 delta=-0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:16.48 +25:14:20.9: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8035 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:56.47 +20:58:27.1: 13.61 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:56.47 +20:58:27.1: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.4187 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:14:37.91 +20:09:01.2: 13.39 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:22.40 +20:10:55.7: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:22:43.10 +19:05:52.9: 13.06 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:14:37.91 +20:09:01.2: 13.40 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:22.40 +20:10:55.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:23:36.10 +19:32:40.8: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.36 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.39 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:22.40 +20:10:55.7: ref_mag=13.36 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2226 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:14:37.91 +20:09:01.2: ref_mag=13.39 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3789 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:17.83 +25:01:12.3: 13.31 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:22:43.10 +19:05:52.9: 12.99 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.02 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:22:43.10 +19:05:52.9: ref_mag=13.02 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0546 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:23:36.10 +19:32:40.8: 13.07 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:02:00.44 +20:16:30.8: 13.19 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:23:36.10 +19:32:40.8: ref_mag=13.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0981 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:17.83 +25:01:12.3: 13.36 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:17.83 +25:01:12.3: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3029 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:02:00.44 +20:16:30.8: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.19 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:02:00.44 +20:16:30.8: ref_mag=13.19 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0739 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:45.47 +23:46:05.9: 12.76 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:37.31 +24:18:22.2: 12.65 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.0: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:52.46 +23:55:56.1: 12.17 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:17.35 +22:34:22.1: 12.46 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:00:53.06 +23:20:23.9: 12.57 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:37.31 +24:18:22.2: 12.38 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:27.62 +24:05:46.4: 12.54 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.49 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:37.31 +24:18:22.2: ref_mag=12.49 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7980 delta=-0.31 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:45.47 +23:46:05.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.76 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:45.47 +23:46:05.9: ref_mag=12.76 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.9302 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.98 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:19.32 +24:25:09.0: ref_mag=12.98 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.9490 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:52.46 +23:55:56.1: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.14 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:52.46 +23:55:56.1: ref_mag=12.14 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.2364 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:17.35 +22:34:22.1: 12.10 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.23 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:17.35 +22:34:22.1: ref_mag=12.23 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.5196 delta=-0.29 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:00:53.06 +23:20:23.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.57 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:00:53.06 +23:20:23.9: ref_mag=12.57 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.7580 delta=-0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:27.62 +24:05:46.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.54 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:27.62 +24:05:46.4: ref_mag=12.54 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=12.3657 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:04.80 +24:48:39.3: 11.78 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:04.80 +24:48:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.78 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:04.80 +24:48:39.3: ref_mag=11.78 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.9609 delta=-0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:55.65 +20:16:17.1: 11.62 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:02.84 +23:18:02.9: 12.04 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:55.65 +20:16:17.1: 11.57 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:54.38 +21:19:13.2: 12.19 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:14.33 +23:18:09.0: 12.16 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.59 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:02.84 +23:18:02.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:55.65 +20:16:17.1: ref_mag=11.59 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.4521 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.04 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:02.84 +23:18:02.9: ref_mag=12.04 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.0335 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:42:14.85 +25:21:39.5: 11.85 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:04:11.00 +25:24:58.3: 12.79 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:49.19 +24:25:33.7: 12.00 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:14.33 +23:18:09.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:54.38 +21:19:13.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.16 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.19 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:14.33 +23:18:09.0: ref_mag=12.16 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1377 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:54.38 +21:19:13.2: ref_mag=12.19 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.1018 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:42:14.85 +25:21:39.5: 11.82 +/- 0.01 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:49.19 +24:25:33.7: 12.17 +/- 0.02 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:04:11.00 +25:24:58.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 11.84 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:42:14.85 +25:21:39.5: ref_mag=11.84 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=11.8835 delta=-0.05 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.79 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.07 +/- 0.01
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:04:11.00 +25:24:58.3: ref_mag=12.79 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=12.6141 delta=0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:49.19 +24:25:33.7: ref_mag=12.07 +/- 0.01 new_mean_mag=12.1642 delta=-0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:45.0: 13.38 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:07:24.23 +24:06:38.1: 13.17 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:45.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:07:24.23 +24:06:38.1: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:57:43.74 +24:45:45.0: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2094 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.17 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:07:24.23 +24:06:38.1: ref_mag=13.17 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=12.9862 delta=0.18 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:03:09.97 +24:16:42.9: 13.38 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:16:15.98 +19:32:17.9: 15.85 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:46.44 +22:44:45.3: 13.00 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:02.94 +24:04:17.4: 13.27 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:03:09.97 +24:16:42.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.38 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:03:09.97 +24:16:42.9: ref_mag=13.38 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.2598 delta=0.12 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:01.53 +23:19:31.2: 13.35 +/- 0.13 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:16:15.98 +19:32:17.9: 15.81 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:46.44 +22:44:45.3: 12.89 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.94 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:46.44 +22:44:45.3: ref_mag=12.94 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=12.8737 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:02.94 +24:04:17.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.27 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:02.94 +24:04:17.4: ref_mag=13.27 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2500 delta=0.02 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:10:27.70 +17:41:52.2: 13.14 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:01.53 +23:19:31.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.13
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:01.53 +23:19:31.2: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.13 new_mean_mag=13.2812 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:07.70 +24:37:17.4: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:10:27.70 +17:41:52.2: 13.16 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.15 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:10:27.70 +17:41:52.2: ref_mag=13.15 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1471 delta=0.00 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:07.70 +24:37:17.4: 13.17 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.23 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:07.70 +24:37:17.4: ref_mag=13.23 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.0466 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:29.73 +22:33:46.9: 13.69 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:59.36 +19:27:01.4: 13.35 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:12.57 +23:50:37.2: 13.50 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:01:25.99 +23:43:28.0: 13.62 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:17:53.63 +19:26:20.7: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:29.73 +22:33:46.9: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.69 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:29.73 +22:33:46.9: ref_mag=13.69 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4899 delta=0.20 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:59.36 +19:27:01.4: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.35 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:59.36 +19:27:01.4: ref_mag=13.35 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.2898 delta=0.06 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:01:25.99 +23:43:28.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:12.57 +23:50:37.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.62 +/- 0.07
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:01:25.99 +23:43:28.0: ref_mag=13.62 +/- 0.07 new_mean_mag=13.6087 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:12.57 +23:50:37.2: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.2790 delta=0.22 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:17:53.63 +19:26:20.7: 13.34 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.33 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:17:53.63 +19:26:20.7: ref_mag=13.33 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1837 delta=0.14 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:09:22.95 +24:17:47.3: 13.51 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:41:45.22 +21:11:43.2: 13.03 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:09:22.95 +24:17:47.3: 13.41 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.45 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:09:22.95 +24:17:47.3: ref_mag=13.45 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.3597 delta=0.09 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:44.72 +19:53:32.2: 13.48 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:39:28.47 +22:07:59.9: 12.98 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:43:31.02 +22:39:20.7: 13.12 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:41:45.22 +21:11:43.2: 13.04 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.03 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:41:45.22 +21:11:43.2: ref_mag=13.03 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0645 delta=-0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:44.72 +19:53:32.2: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.48 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:44.72 +19:53:32.2: ref_mag=13.48 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4037 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:28:54.06 +20:15:39.4: 13.42 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:43:31.02 +22:39:20.7: 13.01 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:39:28.47 +22:07:59.9: 12.85 +/- 0.03 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.06 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:43:31.02 +22:39:20.7: ref_mag=13.06 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0665 delta=-0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 12.91 +/- 0.02
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:39:28.47 +22:07:59.9: ref_mag=12.91 +/- 0.02 new_mean_mag=13.0778 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:28:54.06 +20:15:39.4: 13.25 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.32 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:08:16.35 +23:32:39.3: 13.50 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:28:54.06 +20:15:39.4: ref_mag=13.32 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.1565 delta=0.16 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:24:18.89 +17:52:08.9: 13.32 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:44:48.28 +25:42:49.3: 15.82 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:08:16.35 +23:32:39.3: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.50 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:08:16.35 +23:32:39.3: ref_mag=13.50 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.4650 delta=0.03 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:24:18.89 +17:52:08.9: 13.18 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.24 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:24:18.89 +17:52:08.9: ref_mag=13.24 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.2241 delta=0.01 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:06:32.53 +23:45:26.7: 13.79 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:44:48.28 +25:42:49.3: 15.74 +/- 99.00 upperlimit
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:06:32.53 +23:45:26.7: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.79 +/- 0.06
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:06:32.53 +23:45:26.7: ref_mag=13.79 +/- 0.06 new_mean_mag=13.7196 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:19:18.89 +19:47:58.3: 13.63 +/- 0.05 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:18:57.36 +23:22:23.7: 14.05 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:19:18.89 +19:47:58.3: 13.41 +/- 0.04 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:18:57.36 +23:22:23.7: 13.93 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.49 +/- 0.03
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.98 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:19:18.89 +19:47:58.3: ref_mag=13.49 +/- 0.03 new_mean_mag=13.3933 delta=0.10 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:18:57.36 +23:22:23.7: ref_mag=13.98 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.5917 delta=0.39 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:05:21.82 +21:53:50.0: 14.06 +/- 0.09 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:26:02.83 +25:35:10.5: 13.95 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 05:59:13.19 +23:58:50.6: 15.09 +/- 0.20 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-01-17_20-49-11_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0057.fits at 06:35:41.36 +26:15:30.2: 13.94 +/- 0.07 detection
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:05:21.82 +21:53:50.0: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:26:02.83 +25:35:10.5: 13.87 +/- 0.08 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 14.06 +/- 0.09
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:05:21.82 +21:53:50.0: ref_mag=14.06 +/- 0.09 new_mean_mag=13.8745 delta=0.19 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.92 +/- 0.05
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:26:02.83 +25:35:10.5: ref_mag=13.92 +/- 0.05 new_mean_mag=13.8451 delta=0.07 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 05:59:13.19 +23:58:50.6: 99.00 +/- 99.00 bad_region
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 15.09 +/- 0.20
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 05:59:13.19 +23:58:50.6: ref_mag=15.09 +/- 0.20 new_mean_mag=14.3057 delta=0.78 (need > 0.90)
Forced photometry on wcs_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_23-25-36_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0041.fits at 06:35:41.36 +26:15:30.2: 13.73 +/- 0.06 detection
Forced photometry reference-image weighted average: 13.82 +/- 0.04
Forced photometry filter REJECTED candidate at 06:35:41.36 +26:15:30.2: ref_mag=13.82 +/- 0.04 new_mean_mag=13.9954 delta=-0.17 (need > 0.90)
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261416.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out261614.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 23s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261036_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261036_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:55.31 +24:26:50.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261037_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261037_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:39.95 +24:14:24.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261038_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261038_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261043_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261043_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261057_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261059_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261059_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:06.03 +23:38:45.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261060_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261066_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261066_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261071_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261071_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261073_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261073_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261077_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261077_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:55.77 +24:04:27.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261078_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 261078_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261080_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261080_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261083_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261083_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:26.01 +24:59:36.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261096_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261096_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:20.47 +22:13:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261097_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261097_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:48.07 +22:38:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261098_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261098_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:19.45 +25:57:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261107_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261107_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:39.96 +22:50:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261108_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261108_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261110_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:06.36 +23:11:34.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261115_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261115_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261117_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:27.66 +22:26:29.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261123_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261123_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:01.42 +24:25:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261125_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261125_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261126_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261126_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261127_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261127_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261128_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261128_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:52.95 +18:21:04.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261133_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261133_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:40:02.74 +20:31:09.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261134_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261134_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261140_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261140_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:14.84 +22:47:16.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261141_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:26.86 +20:08:58.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261142_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.42 +19:57:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261144_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261148_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261148_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:31.10 +26:13:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261150_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:49.92 +21:47:15.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261151_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261151_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.85 +25:51:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261155_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261155_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:48.60 +23:32:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261159_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:43:40.60 +18:39:49.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261162_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261162_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:49.54 +23:57:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261165_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261165_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.38 +25:09:01.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261167_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:18.97 +20:13:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261169_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:56.11 +22:35:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261171_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261172_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:59.31 +17:48:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261174_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261174_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:15.15 +20:38:19.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261177_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261181_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261181_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261182_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261184_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261184_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261188_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:17.81 +18:59:20.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261189_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261189_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261191_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:01.80 +20:18:50.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261192_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261192_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261193_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261193_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:53.33 +17:47:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261196_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261196_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:51.60 +18:25:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261197_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261197_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261198_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261198_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:08.69 +25:14:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261199_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261199_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:27:45.95 +20:46:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261201_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 261201_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261203_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261203_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:58.62 +22:27:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261220_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261220_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:12.99 +22:51:14.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261224_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261224_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:11.18 +22:21:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261225_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261225_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:51.69 +24:02:06.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261237_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261237_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261240_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261240_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.50 +20:10:36.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261243_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261244_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261244_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:04.29 +22:32:08.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261247_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261247_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:01.91 +25:55:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261253_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261253_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:17.00 +22:20:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261254_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261258_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261260_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261260_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:59:37.49 +21:37:20.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261265_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261265_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261280_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261280_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261288_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261288_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:23.61 +25:13:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261292_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261292_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:12:01.23 +21:52:19.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261295_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261295_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:57.75 +23:16:59.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261299_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261299_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:04.28 +25:39:24.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261304_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261304_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:38.97 +24:26:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261309_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261309_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:49.40 +19:19:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261310_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261310_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:49.65 +22:33:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261319_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261319_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.19 +20:55:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261322_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261322_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:56.92 +18:21:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261326_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:16.76 +22:09:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261328_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261328_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:58.23 +23:15:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261334_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:27.64 +24:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261340_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261340_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:45.56 +22:41:57.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261341_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261341_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:58:48.23 +25:47:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261350_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261350_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:52.18 +18:15:09.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261353_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261353_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:12.45 +24:17:51.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261354_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261354_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261357_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:48.28 +22:42:25.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261364_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:45.96 +21:10:54.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261365_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261365_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261366_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261366_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:40.04 +25:01:55.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261374_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:28.69 +24:23:49.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261376_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261376_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:00:05.50 +19:58:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261377_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261377_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:37.47 +24:36:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261379_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261379_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:23.33 +26:08:51.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261383_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261383_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:21.49 +23:37:18.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261386_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261386_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:04.67 +24:51:55.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261390_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261390_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:03:33.46 +18:11:16.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261395_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:10:54.47 +20:35:47.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261398_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261398_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:32:39.67 +23:08:32.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261399_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261399_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:42.38 +20:26:16.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261401_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261401_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:42.96 +18:02:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261403_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261408_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261408_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:14.60 +22:51:02.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261412_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:54.20 +23:17:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261416_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 261416_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261417_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:45.93 +22:43:13.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261418_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261419_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261421_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261424_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261424_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:09:38.53 +23:06:04.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261428_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261428_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:18.06 +25:35:56.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261436_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261436_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:46.45 +22:32:09.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261439_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261439_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:20:55.65 +23:58:52.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261443_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261443_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:45.02 +25:04:16.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261449_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261449_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261454_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261454_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:13:32.31 +18:42:08.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261459_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261459_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261460_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261460_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:21.51 +20:55:43.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261461_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261461_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:18.42 +22:44:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261464_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261464_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:40.88 +18:32:11.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261472_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261472_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:54.33 +22:10:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261473_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261473_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:17:14.84 +18:55:36.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261475_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261475_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:06:54.08 +18:37:33.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261478_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261488_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:35:53.23 +22:57:35.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261491_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:24:58.07 +24:09:00.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261496_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261496_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261500_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261500_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261502_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261502_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261516_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261516_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:48.17 +24:59:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261520_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:12.36 +23:58:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261522_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:02:00.50 +19:46:03.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261523_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261523_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261527_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261527_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:26:12.74 +22:43:40.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261529_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261529_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261530_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261530_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:22:51.54 +17:49:02.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261535_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261535_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261537_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261537_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:15:39.43 +18:19:40.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261538_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261538_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261541_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261541_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:29:01.30 +21:34:31.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261543_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261543_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261549_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261549_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:05.60 +21:05:23.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261553_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261553_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261557_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261557_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:01.47 +25:48:16.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261558_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261558_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261561_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261561_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:08:00.32 +23:44:30.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261567_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261567_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:34:45.33 +19:25:52.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261569_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261569_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:11.61 +24:36:02.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261580_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261580_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261589_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261589_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261591_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261591_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:37:48.65 +21:26:58.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261609_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:16.92 +19:37:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
Preparing report for the candidate 261614_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261618_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261618_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261619_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261619_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:05:07.17 +24:21:41.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261621_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261621_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:48.84 +21:38:42.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261624_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261624_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:31:56.35 +22:12:13.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261630_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261630_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:18.81 +20:01:28.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261635_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261635_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:11:26.41 +22:59:59.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261636_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261636_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261639_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261639_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261651_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261651_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:18:25.26 +23:49:57.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261654_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261654_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:39:03.85 +25:33:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261658_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261658_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:25:31.44 +23:28:43.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261672_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261672_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:30:01.48 +23:29:45.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261675_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261675_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:16:26.28 +25:43:34.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261683_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261683_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:03.93 +23:40:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261695_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261695_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261707_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261707_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261721_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261721_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 261737_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 261737_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 70632_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:45:25.96 +20:28:13.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 43809_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:38:58.41 +19:09:05.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 29565_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:19:43.80 +18:15:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 26518_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:28:39.04 +18:11:04.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 95772_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 95772_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:04:01.45 +21:13:32.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 89257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 89257_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:14:40.92 +21:09:21.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 101327_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 06:23:10.84 +21:50:52.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 181671_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473
The candidate 181671_fd_Gem-03-Q2b1x1_2026-08-17_04-49-54_20.00sec_-0.00C_LIGHT_0473 did not pass the final checks
